I'm trying to build a SOAP/Web Services client in a language probably nobody has heard of (DataFlex), and I've had some success - I can now connect to almost...
-- Background -- The SOAP 1.2 spec is now in a review period called "Last Call" which lasts until July 19. During this period, the XML Protocol Working Group...
FYI: The Axis Java2WSDL tool reports that http://www.whitemesa. com/interop/InteropTestC.wsdl is invalid as {http://soapinterop.org/} InteropTestPortType is...
... service? ... http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe? A2=ind0205a&L=dime&F=&S=&P=833 I'm in the process of writing up the attachments interop tests that...
... {http://soapinterop.org/} ... That doc is not designed to be used stand-alone, but rather in conjuction with the other docs, and a wrapper doc that imports...
Hi, At the moment the description is limited to the WSDL docs: http://www.whitemesa.net/wsdl/dime_test.wsdl (doc/literal) ...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 1, 2002 10:19 pm
8046
... I agree. But if we do, we should also include aspects that are unique to SOAP 1.2, not merely SOAP 1.1services recast to a SOAP 1.2 syntax. Mark Baker...
... Per Sanjiva Weerawarana (one of the authors of the WSDL spec), such an import does not make this WSDL legal. Sanjiva, can you verify this? - Sam Ruby...
SOAP Toolkit V3 endpoint supports similar interface and describes it in terms of WSDL-DIME spec[1] : http://mssoapinterop.org/stkv3/dime/dimeinterop.wsdl we'll...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Jul 1, 2002 11:08 pm
8049
... Are there similar WSDLs for attachment endpoints? - Sam Ruby...
There are currently no SwA tests. Simon's working on those, but they're not out yet. What Simon had been doing before he started these tests is using the...
... Just trying to get organized - retrofitting old tests to use the published WSDLs, planning to publish the status or results from all tests, etc. - Sam Ruby...
Hmmm, it's just another qname value, like "s:SOAPStruct" in the message elements above it, yet the tool doesn't complain about that? It's a similar situation,...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 2, 2002 1:14 am
8053
Hi, Bob, What do echoBase64, echoHexBinary, echoBase64Out methods take/return? Plain SOAP or SOAP-DIME? Thanks ... From: Bob Cunnings...
Kirill Gavrylyuk
kirillg@...
Jul 2, 2002 1:50 am
8054
Hi, echoBase64 and echoHexBinary were meant go either way... the input values could be sent as DIME attachments OR plain soap parameters. The response message...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 2, 2002 2:25 am
8055
... I agree that it is probably the biggest change. But I don't care. It's a political sop to a bunch of REST hoi polloi. Or, as commercial folks might call...
... Nice aphorism, but inappropriate. The difference then was that it was about a feature that was already used, had interop needs, etc. This is a brand-new...
I've put up some draft attachment tests docs/wsdl's at www.pocketsoap.com/interop/attachments.htm These cover DIME/WS-Attachments and MIME/SwA with RPC/Encoded...
Hi, I'm trying to get a handle on this implementation wise. So what would this "unique URI" look like? Is it possible to implement this new pattern without ...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 2, 2002 2:31 pm
8063
... would this ... pattern without ... GET, at ... That's why I suggested a "create" operation which returns a hypertext link to the new resource in the...
... From http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#RPConWeb "No standard means of representation of arguments or method names is provided by this...
Worse yet, from what I gather the use of SOAP headers is precluded by this scheme. I can scarce imagine a deployed service that wouldn't use header blocks to...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 2, 2002 3:33 pm
8067
Ok, I see. It's as much an exercise in application level interop as it is SOAP interop. So for conveying the link URL to the client, what do you consider best:...
Bob Cunnings
cunnings@...
Jul 2, 2002 3:43 pm
8068
I know, it was a rhetorical question. :) ... Given our complete failure to get an interoperable standard for map et al, I really think it is inappropriate for...