roger ceragioli wrote:
>
>
> I simply wanted to show what kind of spot sizes one could expect
> without tilting the eyepiece. So, yes, I let the optimization
> algorithm proceed without allowing for a focal plane tilt. One could
> add another coordinate break and let the program determine the
> optimum tilt. But unless one built as an accessory a holder to hold
> the eyepiece at the specified tilt, then one would not realize the
> calculated image quality, no?


That's what I thought, but, yes, I wanted to confirm it.