Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
starmaster_scopes · Special Interest Group for owners of Starmaster telescopes
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 17839 - 17869 of 17869   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
17839
Bob, Update - now there is an 18" F/4 and a 16.5" FX on the in-stock page. Yes, the 22" F/3.3 Super FX is just fantastically convenient to use. I need one...
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
3:41 pm
17840
That's really interesting, Bob. You'd think Rick would be content by now. That speaks volumes about the FX series. I'm sure you noticed the 24" FX that was on...
Linton
lintonius
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
6:13 pm
17841
Hi Starmaster Friends, After reading a post in another telescope group over designing a new focuser that has finer focusing than the current fine focusing on...
Peter
prnatscher
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
9:47 pm
17842
It's interesting that the well-known ATM, Mel Bartels, recommends offsetting the diagonal, but no scope maker actually does this to their scopes. I'm going to...
Peter
prnatscher
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
9:47 pm
17843
Thanks Jan, I want to use this calculator but could not complete the entering of my pertinent info for my 24" f/3.7 scope. The last entry asks for the...
Peter
prnatscher
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
9:47 pm
17844
Any volunteers to take over full moderation of this group?...
ngc1514
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
9:48 pm
17845
Mike, Thank you for your time and information. I look forward to learning more about your excellent fast mirrors in the Starmasters, both Pyrex and Quartz. I...
Gardner
ghflhri97
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2009
9:49 pm
17846
It is the distance from the secondary mirror to the focal plane. The focal plane is (about) at the position of the end of the focuser (the side in which you...
Jan van Gastel
janvangastel
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2009
7:10 am
17847
Hey all, I have the older white-faced model Sky Commander. I don't have the new Sky Commander with the black face, but I was wondering about the external...
stripe1966
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2009
4:50 pm
17848
... You can remove that variable- aim at the moon, then remove the EP and put a piece of scotch tape over the end of the drawtube. Then focus the image on the...
John Mahony
jmmahony
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2009
10:25 pm
17849
I am taking delivery from Rick at Chiefland in a few weeks. This should be a nice jump from my 12.5 EL f5 I've been using for 8 years. Allen Stuart FL...
acomocean
Offline Send Email
Oct 29, 2009
11:34 pm
17850
I'll do it. I just got yet another auto-reply from "simulh". -John...
John Mahony
jmmahony
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
1:18 am
17851
I'm going to set up and roll the 24" FX outside onto my driveway and point it at the `bright' gibbous moon. With the moon as a bright target, I will then...
Peter
prnatscher
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
2:50 am
17852
You've got it, John. You are now the owner of the group. Thanks! Eric da ex-moderator...
Eric Greene
ngc1514
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
2:52 am
17853
Yes, that's also possible, but only when the wheather is good enough. The way I do it, it's not necessary to assemble the telescope. Only the secondary cage is...
Jan van Gastel
janvangastel
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
7:01 am
17855
Allen, That should be a great telescope at a very convenient height. Look forward to seeing it and you at CAV. Bob Schilling...
gumbydad2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
11:08 am
17856
... Yes, 18" * 4 = 72", the same focal length as the 22" F/3.3. It is a VERY convenient height for someone about 6' tall, with lots of seated observing...
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
7:20 pm
17857
... Not true. Proper alignment procedures that use an autocollimator to close the optical path effectively introduce offset. Read on below. ... Well, if...
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
7:22 pm
17858
I set up the 24" FX last night outside on my driveway and pointed the scope at the bright gibbous moon. I put a strip of translucent frosty adhesive tape...
Peter
prnatscher
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
7:38 pm
17859
I hope to be stepping up from my 12.5" in the not too distant future, Being very vertically challenged ( I am just over 5'2") I am looking at the 16.5" FX....
jondannehy@...
darkenerg7
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
9:08 pm
17860
John: If you are talking about wanting more light collection, then here are important numbers. One magnitude fainter stars require a 2.5x increase in light...
Charlie Miller
millercharlie86
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
9:28 pm
17861
... Agreed. 75% more light also helps me personally see more detail as planetary magnifications get higher. Another major advantage of the 16.5" is the fast...
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
10:07 pm
17862
... Whatever - but easy there big fella - Vic Menard is friend of this group and used to own a StarMaster. I don't think anyone except, perhaps you, took...
Paul Leuba
ngc891_2003
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
11:22 pm
17863
I am on my second 20" Starmaster and owned a 16" Starmaster. The 16.5" is very sweet as Mike said because of the thinner, lighter, faster equilibrating mirror...
gumbydad2002
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2009
12:21 am
17864
Sorry guys (and Bob), I misread that paragraph and thought that Bob was suggesting contacting the telescope company, not Vic! Vic is a great resource and I...
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2009
3:08 am
17865
... That's exactly the term I made up for it here (and/or the bigdob group) when I heard about Vic's method several years ago. The optical differences between...
John Mahony
jmmahony
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2009
4:04 am
17866
Hi Jon, thought I would chime in on the 16.5". I actually purchased the very first 16.5 FX at F3.6 and it is unbelievable in its performance. I will have to...
John VeDepo
starmaster_2...
Offline Send Email
Oct 31, 2009
1:48 pm
17867
... I ran the calculator and to get a 0.37-inch offset requires a 6-inch minor axis secondary mirror! Is that correct? Regardless, a 0.37-inch offset will...
Vic
vmpte2001
Offline Send Email
Nov 3, 2009
2:00 am
17868
Well, if all went well Rick should be at Chiefland delivering a 28" and an 18" telescope. Please post here if you get a chance to observe with either of them....
parabola30
Offline Send Email
Nov 9, 2009
2:09 am
17869
Mike,   I observed with Rick and Carol last night.  We were using Gary Beyerstein's 20" f/3.7 SM.  Despite poor sky conditions, we all had a good time.   ...
Jack Huerkamp
jhuerkmp...
Offline Send Email
Nov 10, 2009
1:24 am
Messages 17839 - 17869 of 17869   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help