Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
stormwaterpro · The discussion group for stormwater management professionals
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
LA State Water Resource Control Board   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #169 of 520 |
Does anybody have any information on the controversy surrounding the
following article? I am interested in how this issue regarding the LA
SWRCB may affect other communities in California and the country.



SIGNAL HILL, CA - A coalition of cities in the state have urged Gov.
Gray Davis to modify or repeal stormwater regulations recently adopted
by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The regulations, the Coalition for Practical Regulation stated, are so
strict that the measures necessary to meet the mandates will cost
agencies and residents dearly.

An letter to the governor was delivered on Friday and copies were
published in the form of advertisements in some Southern California
newspapers, bearing the signatures of 76 elected officials, including 25
mayors, representing 39 cities in Los Angeles County.

The coalition said the letter highlights concerns of many cities that
the rules, which were adopted by the Regional Board without undergoing a
cost-benefit analysis, will devastate local government budgets while
failing to produce meaningful environmental benefits.

"A study commissioned by the California Department of Transportation
estimated that these stormwater regulations will cost $54 billion and
could trigger property tax increases of up to 70 percent for Southern
California homeowners - equivalent to a family budget busting tax of
$1,295 a year,'' the letter said.

"The staggering costs imposed by the board's ineffective stormwater
regulations will force cities, already suffering from thinly stretched
budgets, to pay for compliance by raising taxes or by cutting essential
public services such as law enforcement and fire protection," the group
said in the letter.



A decision is expected by late summer or early fall on the regulation
issue. Meanwhile, the cities and county have requested a stay of
implementation in the intervening months prior to publication of the
appeal decision.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Fri May 3, 2002 10:46 pm

mph@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #169 of 520 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Does anybody have any information on the controversy surrounding the following article? I am interested in how this issue regarding the LA SWRCB may affect...
Martyn Hoffmann
mph@...
Send Email
May 3, 2002
11:15 pm

To respond to you question I would like to know what specifically are the waters rules you are concerned about. Is this about stormwater pollution for drinking...
ecoboom@...
Send Email
May 4, 2002
3:44 pm

Good question. All I have read about the issue is the news article I forwarded. I have not been able to find anything else. ... From: ecoboom@......
Martyn Hoffmann
mph@...
Send Email
May 6, 2002
3:04 pm

I would suggest checking out the Coalition for Practical Reform's website for more information: http://www.citiessavejobs.com Molly ... From: Martyn Hoffmann...
Nichelson, Molly
mollynichelson
Offline Send Email
May 6, 2002
3:56 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help