From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: ".GeneralAgencyServices.com" <gear2000@...>
Subject: CHRC meeting report, "Climate and Advanced Electromagnetics" paper
presented
Date: Sunday, October 15, 2000 11:22 AM

The first of three weekly Community Business Meeting in Tehachapi to explore
the Capital Hills Research Center project, proposed for the Capital Hills
Development to further the rapid development of new energy technologies to
replace nuclear and fossil fuel power (overview at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan ),
took place at the Denny's Restaurant meeting room at the Mill Street exit
of Hwy58 in Capital Hills last Wednesday evening October 11th at 7:30PM.

The next two such public meetings will take place at the same time and the
same
place on two more Wednesday evenings, October 18th and October 25th, to
acquaint community members with the status and potential of this project,
and to establish an exploratory committee to further the Research Center
development plans.

This first meeting was attended by four Tehachapi residents and two guests
from Los Angeles and San Jose, including Dr. Fred B. Wood, Sr., who at age
82 considered this meeting of such importance that he took an arduous train
ride to Tehachapi to deliver his message about this new science and its
various applications -- along with copies of a 4-page abridged version
(abstracted below) of his 20pp paper "Climate and Advanced Electromagnetics"
that he prepared for the July 18-21, 2000,
International Society of Systems Sciences in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Dr. Wood explained that he had started college at UC Berkeley studying
sociology until he changed to electronics to help with the war efforts, to
stop Hitler from taking over the world, by developing rocket-targeting RADAR
systems that helped England deter the Nazi rocket bombardment.  Wood went on
to have a long career with IBM in systems theory and electronics development
applying his doctorate of electrical engineering, and at the same time
lobbying the government and industry to take socially responsible actions
with scientific knowledge.   For over 15 years now Dr. Wood has been deeply
studying the peaceful and potentially covert military applications of this n
ew science, especially as to the potential of advanced electromagnetic
weapons to influence global climate change factors detrimentally.  He was a
featured presenter of this information at UCSB in 1997 during our briefing
for the science advisor to His Holiness Dalai Lama, and in 1999 at
UCBerkeley http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/fwood.html
during our Global Crisis Solutions Conference there
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gcsc2.html

Capital Hills owner John Guthrie explained at last Wednesday's meeting the
history of the development of Capital Hills and about the Mello-Roos bond
calculation error made by a City Contractor that has plagued sale of Capital
Hills Phase One lots which due in part to this error are now subject to
foreclosure procedings.  This initial small group committee meeting included
longtime local resident, and son of a former Tehachapi mayor, Gerald Valdez,
who has for years been promoting "grandiose" plans for Tehachapi and Capital
Hills developments.  Local photographer and technologist Ed Delvers, former
research assistant to new-energy pioneer the late Bruce DePalma
(http://www.depalma.pair.com), was one of the attendees with the technical
background to understand Dr. Wood's message about how the complex original
"quaternion" version of the equations of electromagnetism developed by James
Clerk Maxwell over 150 years ago were "rounded off" and only "first root"
values have been employed in contemporary electronics by most researchers
until the past few decades when the work of Nikola Tesla has been reexamined
in light of the "second and third roots" of Maxwell's equations which
explore "scalar electromagnetics" especially as relates to advanced
electromagnetic weaponry developments being tested, and "biological systems
applications of electromagnetism" such as understanding the "fifth
dimension" (beyond our three "dimensions" of distance -- ie, length, area,
volume -- and our one "dimension" of time) that evidence indicates is in the
same realm as "spiritual" disciplines and the "bioenergetics" of such
systems.

Copies of Dr. Wood's paper summarized below may be obtained directly from
him at address shown.

He provided anecdotal evidence that many serious aircraft/spacecraft
accidents in recent years may have been caused by testing of advanced
electromagnetic weapons by countries hostile to the United States.  He made
the point that with such strict secrecy restrictions on this knowledge by
the US authorities, it is impossible to know if such other countries are, as
he suspects, decades ahead of the US in development of these weapons whose
principles would be better applied to peaceful energy production
technologies to replace the dangers, costs, and pollutions of nuclear and
fossil fuel power.

Dr. Wood's talk included discussion of the overlooked second and third
"roots" of Maxwell's equations with evidence of their connections to
understanding both their biological implications (values in quantitative
analysis of biological systems) and their spiritual implications (uses of
the mathematical values of "imaginary" root of Maxwell's equations for
understanding the dynamics of "spiritual" and "ethical" systems).

He discussed various plane crashes and other evidence pointing to years of
covert experimentation with advanced electromagnetic weaponry, eg, TWA Flt
800, Egypt Air Flt 990, Challenger Shuttle disaster, China Airlines Flight
006 Taipei to LA 19Feb85.   Also discussed was evidence that the mysterious
(nuclear or meteor-like) blast effecting a remote part of the Soviet Union
in the earlier part of the 20th century was a result of testing a Tesla
electromagnetic weapons application of this knowledge.

One of Dr. Wood's collaborator's, Army Lt. Col. (retired) Dr. Thomas Bearden
PhD, last week announced publication on a DOE website of his recent 69pp
paper evaluating a recent successful test of a solid state electromagnetic
device to produce such "overunity effects" in apparently extracting usable
electricity from the "Zero Point Energy" field produced by quantum vacuum
fluctuations in the same space in which matter resides.  This paper goes in
to a detailed analysis of these overlooked implications of the original form
of the Maxwell Equations. http://www.ott.doe.gov/pdfs/MEGpaper.pdf

Several of the meeting participants, including Dr. Wood, will be forwarding
the Capital Hills Research Center proposal and business plan to various
potential funding sources with a target of implementing an interim facility
in Tehachapi by the end of this year.

CHRC research is already happening in disparate locations.   We are
presently in preparations for verification experiments, by two independent
labs, on a recently released new energy device design and hope to have proof
or falsification report for next weekly meetings.


---begin abstraction of Dr. Wood's paper copied to CHRC meeting 11Oct---

4-page abridged version of 20-page paper opf Fred B. Wood, Sr.,
[University High School Class of 1936] with Andrea Bowe.
University High, Oakland Reunion, September 8, 2000
Little Hills Ranch, San Ramon CA

File No. A1960F Rev. 08/02/00
Prepared fopr the ISSS Conference in Toronto, Canada
D:\Scanner Files\USR\FRED\11960F.wpd   July 18-21, 2000 AD

Climate and Advanced Electromagnetics

A Start of a Proto-Encyclopedia of Systems Theory
Concepts Needed for Relating Climate Cycles to the
Survival of Human Civilization

Fred B. Wood, Sr., M.S., Ph.D. (Electrical Engineering)
Andrea Bowe, B.S. Liberal Studies (2Yr. Electrical Engineering,
1Yr. General Engineering, plus Yr. in Psych. and Nuclear Reactor Tech.)

Computer Social Impact Research Institute, Inc., (non-profit)
Earth Regeneration Society, Inc. (non-profit)
P.O. Box 5583, San Jose, CA 95150-5583
E-Mail:  csiri@...

Twenty-eight systems-component areas of science, electrical engineering,
bio-science, and spirituality are listed which require research to
facilitate the solution of our civilizations's problems with the glacial
cycle being distorted by the CO/2 added to our atmosphere by the burning of
fossil fuels.  A sampling of Fig. 1, Fig. 9A, Roots of Differential
Equations of Electricity and Magnetism, and Fig 11 are displayed below to
show the path of research used here.

Figure 1, Curves of Rise of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and
Global Surface Temperatures During Last 140 years (Karl, 1999)

[Figure 5, The Green Cube -- Template -- for Library of Evolution
Sytems/Indexing grid for levels of data integration, design by Dr. Wood]

Figure 9A, Woodpecker Signals Focussed over North Amercia to/from
Interfereometer RADAR System

Figure 11, N-1 Homopolar Generator, Bruce DePalma

Roots:  Mathematically real root for Physical Systems;  Zero-Sum complex
root for Biological Systems and Human Healing;  Pointer to mathematically
imaginary root for Ethical and Spiritual Systems (see Text & Figs. 13 thru
Fig. 28)


This report alsto constitutes a base of 28 component areas for monitoring
the uses of the energy available in the Quantum Vacuum for four purposes:

1)  Developing an understanding of "Consciousness" related to the Quantum
Vauum Holofield,

2)  Monitoring the Weapons being developed for World War III, to restrict
the STEALING of Quantum Vacuum Energy from the indigenous peoples healing
resources, and

3)  To develop a dialog between the major political forces on our planet on
the proper uses of the three classes of electromagnetic waves for the
benefit of humankind and the planet, and

4)  Establishing an unclassified Manhattan-type Project to design and
produce "over unity" electric generators so that every country in the world
could produce enough electricity for its own use, without having to go to
war for energy sources such as clear cutting of trees, coal mining, and
drilling for oil.  Development of legal protection for trees that may be
the carrier devices (like telephone poles holding wires) for maintaining the
integrity of the holofield.


Hypothesis A:  On Maxwell's Equations [see full 20pp report]

Hypothesis B:  It is estimated that by about 1952 (48 years ago) Joseph
Stalin asked the top Soviet scientists to organize a project of the order of
magnitude of the American Manhattan Project of World War II to explore the
corrections needed to the textbook versions of Maxwell's Equations and the
weapons designs of Nikola Tesla (1904-1910) that would made the Soviet Union
invincible in World War III.  There is evidence that the sectet Soviet
weapons developments have achieved considerable success.  Breshnev,
Krushchev, and Gromyko each in turn made public appeals for the United
Nations to establish a committee to supervise the development of new
weapons of mass destruction.  Our country, the United States, did not
cooperate, saying that we thought the Soviet proposals were a trick to get
us to reveal our future weapons.  It is important that we at least
belatedly take the initiatvie in negotiating for discussions of the new
weapons.  Futhermore, we are learning that part of our human being memory
system is outside the skull in the quantum vacuum holofield where both
American and Russian brains are sharing the same holofield with an
elementary security code provided by Galois field multiplier polynomials for
coding.

Hypothesis C:  There is a severe problem with capitalist economic systems in
that they try to prevent their citizens from understanding how the economic
system works, so that members of the power-elite can manipulate energy
policies to conceal national policies.  For example, overunity engines and
electric generators could be used to solve some energy problems.  The
suppression of the development of overunity engines has greatly increased
the pollution of the environment, and led a growing population to think it
is necessary to go to war to protect our oil deposits.  This means that, if
the United States supported the development of overunity engines, instead
of delaying it, people could get all the electric power they wanted, so
there would be no power drive for people to go to war for oil or their
energy deposits, because everyone could get the power he wanted.  They could
get it by making use of overunity engines and generators which do not
pollute
the environment.  The drive for more oil, gas, and coal may have stimulated
the drive for World War I and World War II, which led to 320,000 casualties
in WWI and 1, 078,000 casualties in WWII.  The speedy development and
distribution of overunity electric motors and generators is the simplest way
to move toward peace.

---------end abstract of paper, omitting many figures/drawings----------

David Crockett Williams, CLU
www.GeneralAgencyServices.com

Coordinator, Capital Hills Research Center project
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

For Immediate Release, October 9, 2000 (Yom Kippur, Yom Kabir)

Putting Tehachapi on the World Map with a New-Energy Technology Center

A just released technical paper posted to a DOE website describes what
appears to be a major breakthrough in proof of concept of new energy
technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, a breakthrough that
will be discussed this week -- at the first of three public weekly Wednesday
Community Business Meetings, at 7:30PM at Denny's Restaurant meeting room in
Capital Hills, about our proposal to develop such technologies globally via
a Capital Hills Research Center -- by retired IBM electronics engineer Dr.
Fred B. Wood, Sr., PhD, one of the "fathers of systems theory" who has a
long history of advanced/forefront electronics systems design since his
pioneering work on radar in the 1940's.

Dr. Wood is in agreement with another of our colleagues, the primary author
of this paper referenced below, US Army Lt. Col. (ret.) Dr. Thomas Bearden
PhD, that this new knowledge has been under development secretly by several
countries for at least a couple of decades for military purposes such as
advanced electromagnetic weaponry, and that it is time for these
technologies to be released and transferred to the public sector to help
resolve today's critical global environmental emergency situations including
climate change and dangerous ozone layer depletion.

This Capital Hills Research Center project is being coordinated by David
Crockett Williams who lectured about it thirteen months ago to the monthly
meeting of the Kern County Technology Transfer Group.  Six months ago DOE
extended their public comments deadline for Williams and some of his
colleagues to contribute recent research on this new-energy genre to the
DOE's year 2000 Strategic Plan (research archived for public review at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan )

This Wednesday's meeting will begin with about 10 minutes of video clips
introducing scientists and inventors in this field such as Bearden, Bruce
DePalma, John Hutchinson, Joseph Newman, and Dr. Brian O'Leary, the former
NASA scientist/astronaut and physics teacher who was science and energy
policy advisor and speechwriter for four US Presidential candidates and
whose initiative this local project is following after Williams' 1998
proposal to DOE for O'Leary's suggested budget of $108 million per year.

Also participating at this week's meeting will be Capital Hills owner John
Guthrie and local technologist Ed Delvers, the former research assistant to
world reknown new energy pioneer, the late Bruce DePalma
http://www.depalma.pair.com

For more information, contact David Crockett Williams, CLU 661-822-3309
www.GeneralAgencyServices.com
Capital Hills Research Center
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html


From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: ".GeneralAgencyServices.com" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Fw: Breakthrough in New Energy Sources
Date: Sunday, October 08, 2000 10:18 AM

This just-announced paper by US Army Lt. Col. (ret.) Dr. Thomas Bearden,
PhD.,
et al, presented recently in Russia and also posted in .pdf format on DOE
website http://www.ott.doe.gov/pdfs/MEGpaper.pdf discusses well referenced
theoretical considerations and experimental verifications on a solid state
"zero point energy generator" apparently now proven at 5:1 output/input
ratio (500% "efficiency") expected to increase to 30:1 with further
development and funding.


----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Craddock
To: webmaster@...
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 10:05 AM
Subject: New Breakthrough Overunity Device Announced


A scientific team headed by Dr. Tom Bearden announced yesterday that they
have developed and tested a new Overunity device that produces a Coefficient
of Performance of 5.

This means that it puts out five times as much power as is fed into it,
making up the difference by extracting free energy from the vacuum.
Essentially it can be considered as a battery that never runs down.

Later models of this breakthrough device are expected to produce COP's in
the region of 30.

The device is known as a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, has no moving
parts, and is based on magnetic principles that were only able to be
utilized when Honeywell produced a new nanocrystalline material which became
available last year.

A paper containing full details and diagrams about the device can be
downloaded from the CSETI Website under What's New (1.3Mb)

This paper is also being carried on the Department of Energy Website.

Regards

Tony Craddock
Web Administrator
CSETI
http://www.cseti.org

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: <.GeneralAgencyServices.com>
Subject: New Energy Technology Center & Global Peace Center (29Sept2000)
Date: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:01 AM

Below is a current article from the local edition of a national "eNews"
site.  http://www.streetmail.com

In it and following article are discussed plans for the New-Energy
Technology Center in Tehachapi to be sited as a new centerpiece for the1000
acre Capital Hills Development north of the Mill Street (middle of 3) exits
off of Hwy 58 (soon to be designated part of Interstate 40) in the Tehachapi
Valley, southernmost of High Sierra Range.

To rapidly finish the research and development of these new technologies to
replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, on a crash program (like a "New
Apollo Project") to implement these technologies to ameliorate global
climate change and ozone layer depletion, this project is being coordinated
by David Crockett Williams of www.GeneralAgencyServices.com following the
initiative for such a "New Apollo Project" by Dr. Brian O'Leary, PhD, a
former NASA scientist/astronaut, physics teacher, space-station design
pioneer, science and energy policy advisor and speechwriter for four US
Presidential candidates, and for over a decade now a globally recognized
speaker, author and authority on New Science applications to revolutionary
understandings of new-energy technologies, solutions to our global
environmental emergency including widespread hemp cultivation to save the
forests and heal the atmosphere, the physics and spirituality of human
consciousness, autonomic healing processes, psi phenomena, as well as the
need to relax government secrecy about ufo's and present dangerous military
applications of this new science with related energy/consciousness
applications for technology transfer from military to commercial uses.
O'Leary travels and speaks globally and is featured on numberous videos on
these topics.  He is the author of several books including "Exploring Inner
and Outer Space", "The Second Coming of Science", "Miracle in the Void", and
his upcoming "".

We need your help to pass this post on throughout your networks so those who
want to collaborate on this new facility, be a part of it from here or on
the net from anywhere, can find out about it and connect with whatever human
or financial resources they want to offer.

There is a very strong land-based financial opportunity described in the two
articles  below, the StreetMail article and the following article by Capital
Hills owner John Guthrie on the Status of Capital Hills.  Funding proposals
are being accepted from both public and private sources.

Interim website address for Capital Hills New Energy Technologies Research
and Development Center is at http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Updates list for collaborators on this project is at
http://www.egroups.com/group/capital-hills


From: "Streetmail, Tehachapi " <YourStreetmail@...>
To: <gear2000@...>
Subject: A hometown high-tech haven?
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:17 PM

http://www.streetmail.com/mostcurrent/catehachapi

____________S T R E E T M A I L______T E H A C H A P I________

Streetmail, Tehachapi
Sept. 29, 2000
Correspondent: Linda Matise
linda@... .

____________S T R E E T . T A L K

HIGH-TECH HAPPENINGS.

Capital Hills owners have spawned plans
for yet another high-tech facility on their rolling hills
north of Highway 58, the once-planned site for Technopolis.
John and Lyn Guthrie and Jim Crawford are donating several
acres for a "Global Peace Now!" theme park with walkways,
picnic tables and a garden for meditation and prayer.

A Global Peace Park Center and a New-Energy Technology Center
will become Capital Hills's pivot point for future development.

David Crockett Williams, a Tehachapi chemical physicist, has
proposed a $108 million budget to the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) for the project, with a 10 percent allocation to
the Capital Hills park. Williams has worked for over 20 years
with scientists and inventors on research for this center and
will conduct community business meetings on Oct. 11, 18 and
25 at 7:30 p.m. at Denny's Restaurant to discuss the project.

The Global Peace Park Center will house a video media
production and viewing room and a video teleconferencing room
to communicate with other countries toward global peace and
inter-cultural understanding. New-energy sources like ZPE
(Zero Point Energy -- an essentially inexhaustible and
ubiquitous resource) will be researched at the New-Energy
Technology Center as an antidote to the greenhouse effect.

DOE experiments reveal ZPE as an enormous energy field that
exists in the same space that matter resides. Williams quoted
the agency as saying: "Any device that could harness ZPE
would be 'the Holy Grail of energy research'."

DOE recognition for ZPE is posted at
http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980512.khan.htm .
Additional information is available at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan .

Williams recommends two books to anyone wishing to know more
about these topics: "The Coming Energy Revolution" by Jeane
Manning, and "Miracle in the Void" by Brian O Leary, Ph.D.,
initiator of this project.

** This project is food for thought, globally and locally. In
the realm of economic growth, do you perceive this center as
putting Tehachapi on the world map?

Enter the Think Tank and let us know how you feel
about Capital Hills and this project. Send your responses to
http://www.streetmail.com/survey/catehachapi/streettalk/20000929 .

Include your FULL NAME and any thoughts on this issue so we
can let City Hall, Mr. Williams and his colleagues know what
the voices of Tehachapi have to say. (Remember: If you vote a
straight Yes/No, your vote will be added to a tally. If you
comment, your name and comment will be printed in next week's
issue.)

____________S T R E E T . M A I L . I N F O

Tehachapi Streetmail is produced by Streetmail.com, Inc.

Correspondent: Linda Matise
(linda@...)

For more information about Streetmail, to see other editions
of Streetmail, or to sign up a friend, check out our Web
site at http://www.streetmail.com .





From: "John Guthrie" <jgu3@...>
Subject: Status of Capital Hills
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:48 PM

Status of Capital Hills

Attended by our local congressman, business people and celebrities, in
August 1989 groundbreaking ceremonies were held for Phase One (121 acres) of
the planned 2000 acre Capital Hills Development located in the City of
Tehachapi at the middle exit of Freeway 58 (soon to be Interstate 40) at the
Mill Street off-ramp in the center of the northern edge of the Tehachapi
Valley,  the southernmost such mountain valley of the High Sierra range.

In cooperation with one of its strategic partners, AT&T, this Phase One
property at Capital Hills has facilities for fiber optic cables along with
all underground utilities already in place.

The intent is to create a planned business, commercial, and residential
development in this quiet semi-rural area, with latest information-age high
technologies employed throughout a "Technopolis" of research parks, light
industry, office and commercial facilities, etc., where workers can live
nearby and walk, bike, or even ride horseback to work in modern facilities
out of the hectic hubub of city life such as the Los Angeles and San
Francisco Bay Area busy and distractive lifestyles that many creative
companies now are subject to.

After the groundbreaking, the 121 acres of improvements (eg. streets, curb
and sidewalks, street lights, underground utilities, etc.) were installed
for Phase One, but several factors combined to stall the development which
to date has just a few new buildings including the new Tehachapi U.S. Post
Office, an ARCO am/pm gas station and mini-mart, and a Denny's Restaurant.

The real estate market in general "went soft" after Phase One subdivision
and the city made a mistake that was discovered too late to correct in their
red tape process, where the "Mello-Roos" bond payments were structured
incorrectly in 1989 by an expert subcontracted by the City of Tehachapi
whose fees were paid by the landowners and who made a gross mathematical
error discovered by the landowners, a mistake which the city was unable or
unwilling to correct and instead insisted must be perpetuated even after the
bonds were later refinanced.  Therefore, the bond payments are much higher
(~200%) than they should be. This situation has made it harder to interest
companies to build on Phase One lands which are heading for foreclosure
procedings initiated by the City in near future to be sold off parcel by
parcel unless quickly an understanding investor comes forward to make a deal
with the owners of Capital Hills to refinance these bonds, pay back taxes,
and get Phase One back on proper economic track.  As a matter of information
over $7 million was spent on improvements on Phase One that was MAI
appraised at up to $30 million with only about $4 million total debt at this
time.

The owners of Capital Hills have offered to donate land for a new energy
technology development center as the new centerpiece to revive the vision of
the Capital Hills Technopolis. This land is just outside the Phase One area.
They have also offered to donate some of the allocated parkland to be
dedicated as a Global Peace Park and Center. The suggested location for this
is on the eastern edge of the phase one property but just outside the
boundary of the area impacted by pending foreclosure procedings. This site
is ready to go and an interim peace and new energy research facility can be
located there very quickly by placing for up to six months a non-permanent
structure (but fully wired and plumbed to the street underground utilities)
while plans are being made for permanent construction of appropriate
facilities.

Introductory information on the Capital Hills New-Energy Research and
Development Center is at http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html with
a link there to the Capital Hills Development website.

-------------end 29Sept2000 update-----------------

**
gear2000@...
David Crockett Williams, CLU
Chartered Life Underwriter
Scientist - Activist - Manager
GENERAL AGENCY SERVICES
http://www.GeneralAgencyServices.com
For your personal and financial independence

The Legal Revolution - Equal Justice for All
Free Legal Resource Center eService
http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/dcwilliams
Online legal content: FAQ, audio guides, legal forms, discussion boards.
Low-cost attorney telephone access, national prepaid legal protection plans.

Create a home-based business plan
to cut current wage income taxes by 1/3 to 1/2
with our IRS compliant Tax Relief System
http://ima.thetaxpeople.net/~dcwillms

Capital Hills New-Energy Research Center
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy list
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: ".GeneralAgencyServices.com" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Fw: Breakthrough in New Energy Sources
Date: Sunday, October 08, 2000 10:18 AM

This just-announced paper by US Army Lt. Col. (ret.) Dr. Thomas Bearden,
PhD.,
et al, presented recently in Russia and also posted in .pdf format on DOE
website http://www.ott.doe.gov/pdfs/MEGpaper.pdf discusses well referenced
theoretical considerations and experimental verifications on a solid state
"zero point energy generator" apparently now proven at 5:1 output/input
ratio (500% "efficiency") expected to increase to 30:1 with further
development and funding,
etc.  Under auspices of his Association of Distinguished American
Scientists, in 1998 Dr. Bearden provided a small grant to upgrade my 1994
level computer for better internet access.

One of Bearden's knowledgeable colleagues, Dr. Fred B. Wood, Sr., (radar
electronics pioneer, one of the "fathers of systems theory", and retired IBM
electronics engineer now in his mid-80's)
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/fwood.html will be attending our (first
of
three weekly) Wednesday
October 11th "Community Business Meeting" here in Tehachapi (7:30pm Denny's
Restaurant meeting room, Capital Hills) to further the Capital Hills Energy
Reseach Center proposal.

Dr. Wood will be visiting Tehachapi for a few days to investigate the
possibility of relocating his residence to Tehachapi soon from San Jose to
take an active part in the leadership of the local center's development.

At this meeting we will show video excerpts of various researchers and
inventors including Bearden, O'Leary, et. al, and Dr. Wood will give a brief
overview of the developmental history of this new energy science.  Former
MIT instructor and Polaroid senior scientist, and pioneering new energy
researcher, Bruce DePalma's http://www.depalma.pair.com former research
assistant (a Tehachapi resident, professional photographer and technologist)
Ed Delvers will also be present for comments.  Capital Hills Development
owner John Guthrie will also take part and will be joined by a few community
and business leaders to offer their reflections on what this proposed new
energy center might mean for the future of the Tehachapi community, local
businesses, and the world.

Members of the Kern County Technology Transfer Group are also invited to
this meeting and to meet privately with Dr. Wood while he is in town to
discuss his official lobbying efforts towards the Federal Government to
relax secrecy regulations on this new energy science for the transfer of new
energy related technologies to civilian use, technologies which are
apparently being
developed under government contracts for military purposes but which are
still too new to be eligible for release under present regulations.

David Crockett Williams 661-822-3309
www.GeneralAgencyServices.com
Tehachapi, California, interim coordinator,
  Capital Hills Research Center project
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@...>
[Internet Science Education Project http://www.stardrive.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 8:16 PM
Subject: Breakthrough in New Energy Sources


> Re:
> http://www.cseti.org/bearden/MEGpaper.pdf
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "EARTHCODE" <earthcode1@...>
> To: <EARTHCODE@...>
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 12:19 PM
> Subject: ** Another Breakthrough in New Energy Sources
>
>
> >
> >
> > <<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>
> >
> > NEW BREAKTHROUGH
> > IN OVERUNITY DEVICE
> >
> > <<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>
> >
> >
> > A scientific team headed by Dr. Tom Bearden announced yesterday that
they
> > have developed and tested a new Overunity device that produces a
> > Coefficient of Performance of 5.
> >
> > This means that it puts out five times as much power as is fed into it,
> > making up the difference by extracting free energy from the vacuum.
> > Essentially it can be considered as a battery that never runs down.
> >
> > Later models of this breakthrough device are expected to produce COP's
in
> > the region of 30.
> >
> > The device is known as a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, has no
> > moving parts, and is based on magnetic principles that were only able to
> be
> > utilized when Honeywell produced a new nanocrystalline material which
> > became available last year.
> >
> > A paper containing full details and diagrams about the device can be
> > downloaded from the CSETI Website under What's New (1.3Mb) [69pp .pdf
> file]
> http://www.cseti.org/bearden/MEGpaper.pdf
> >
> > This paper is also being carried on the Department of Energy Website.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tony Craddock
> > Web Administrator
> > CSETI
> > <http://www.cseti.org>http://www.cseti.org
> >
> > HAVE A GREAT DAY !!!!!
> >
> > <<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>>
> >
> > EARTHCODE & INNER LIGHT NETWORK
> > PO Box 3395
> > Santa Cruz, CA  95063 USA
> > 831-454-1440
> > earthcode@...
> >
> > <<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>><<:::>>

--------end forwarded post----------

**
gear2000@...
David Crockett Williams, CLU
Chartered Life Underwriter
Scientist - Activist - Manager
GENERAL AGENCY SERVICES
http://www.GeneralAgencyServices.com
For your personal and financial independence

The Legal Revolution - Equal Justice for All
Free Legal Resource Center eService
http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/dcwilliams
Online legal content: FAQ, audio guides, legal forms, discussion boards.
Low-cost attorney telephone access, national prepaid legal protection plans.

Create a home-based business plan
to cut current wage income taxes by 1/3 to 1/2
with our IRS compliant Tax Relief System
http://ima.thetaxpeople.net/~dcwillms

Capital Hills New-Energy Research Center
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy list
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org

Below is a current article from the local edition of a national "eNews"
site.  http://www.streetmail.com

In it and following article are discussed plans for the New-Energy
Technology Center in Tehachapi (to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power) to
be sited as a new centerpiece for the1000
acre Capital Hills Development north of the Mill Street (middle of 3) exits
off of Hwy 58 (soon to be designated part of Interstate 40) in the Tehachapi
Valley, southernmost of High Sierra Range.

To rapidly finish the research and development of these new technologies to
replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, on a crash program (like a "New
Apollo Project") to implement these technologies to ameliorate global
climate change and ozone layer depletion, this project is being coordinated
by David Crockett Williams of www.GeneralAgencyServices.com following the
initiative for such a "New Apollo Project" by Dr. Brian O'Leary, PhD, a
former NASA scientist/astronaut, physics teacher, space-station design
pioneer, science and energy policy advisor and speechwriter for four US
Presidential candidates, and for over a decade now a globally recognized
speaker, author and authority on New Science applications to revolutionary
understandings of new-energy technologies, solutions to our global
environmental emergency including widespread hemp cultivation to save the
forests and heal the atmosphere, the physics and spirituality of human
consciousness, autonomic healing processes, psi phenomena, as well as the
need to relax government secrecy about ufo's and present dangerous military
applications of this new science with related energy/consciousness
applications for technology transfer from military to commercial uses.
O'Leary travels and speaks globally and is featured on numberous videos on
these topics.  He is the author of several books including "Exploring Inner
and Outer Space", "The Second Coming of Science", "Miracle in the Void", and
his upcoming "".

We need your help to pass this post on throughout your networks so those who
want to collaborate on this new facility, be a part of it from here or on
the net from anywhere, can find out about it and connect with whatever human
or financial resources they want to offer.

There is a very strong land-based financial opportunity described in the two
articles  below, the StreetMail article and the following article by Capital
Hills owner John Guthrie on the Status of Capital Hills.  Funding proposals
are being accepted from both public and private sources.

Interim website address for Capital Hills New Energy Technologies Research
and Development Center is at http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Updates list for collaborators on this project is at
http://www.egroups.com/group/capital-hills


From: "Streetmail, Tehachapi " <YourStreetmail@...>
To: <gear2000@...>
Subject: A hometown high-tech haven?
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:17 PM

http://www.streetmail.com/mostcurrent/catehachapi

____________S T R E E T M A I L______T E H A C H A P I________

Streetmail, Tehachapi
Sept. 29, 2000
Correspondent: Linda Matise
linda@... .

____________S T R E E T . T A L K

HIGH-TECH HAPPENINGS.

Capital Hills owners have spawned plans
for yet another high-tech facility on their rolling hills
north of Highway 58, the once-planned site for Technopolis.
John and Lyn Guthrie and Jim Crawford are donating several
acres for a "Global Peace Now!" theme park with walkways,
picnic tables and a garden for meditation and prayer.

A Global Peace Park Center and a New-Energy Technology Center
will become Capital Hills's pivot point for future development.

David Crockett Williams, a Tehachapi chemical physicist, has
proposed a $108 million budget to the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) for the project, with a 10 percent allocation to
the Capital Hills park. Williams has worked for over 20 years
with scientists and inventors on research for this center and
will conduct community business meetings on Oct. 11, 18 and
25 at 7:30 p.m. at Denny's Restaurant to discuss the project.

The Global Peace Park Center will house a video media
production and viewing room and a video teleconferencing room
to communicate with other countries toward global peace and
inter-cultural understanding. New-energy sources like ZPE
(Zero Point Energy -- an essentially inexhaustible and
ubiquitous resource) will be researched at the New-Energy
Technology Center as an antidote to the greenhouse effect.

DOE experiments reveal ZPE as an enormous energy field that
exists in the same space that matter resides. Williams quoted
the agency as saying: "Any device that could harness ZPE
would be 'the Holy Grail of energy research'."

DOE recognition for ZPE is posted at
http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980512.khan.htm .
Additional information is available at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan .

Williams recommends two books to anyone wishing to know more
about these topics: "The Coming Energy Revolution" by Jeane
Manning, and "Miracle in the Void" by Brian O Leary, Ph.D.,
initiator of this project.

** This project is food for thought, globally and locally. In
the realm of economic growth, do you perceive this center as
putting Tehachapi on the world map?

Enter the Think Tank and let us know how you feel
about Capital Hills and this project. Send your responses to
http://www.streetmail.com/survey/catehachapi/streettalk/20000929 .

Include your FULL NAME and any thoughts on this issue so we
can let City Hall, Mr. Williams and his colleagues know what
the voices of Tehachapi have to say. (Remember: If you vote a
straight Yes/No, your vote will be added to a tally. If you
comment, your name and comment will be printed in next week's
issue.)

____________S T R E E T . M A I L . I N F O

Tehachapi Streetmail is produced by Streetmail.com, Inc.

Correspondent: Linda Matise
(linda@...)

For more information about Streetmail, to see other editions
of Streetmail, or to sign up a friend, check out our Web
site at http://www.streetmail.com .





From: "John Guthrie" <jgu3@...>
Subject: Status of Capital Hills
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:48 PM

Status of Capital Hills

Attended by our local congressman, business people and celebrities, in
August 1989 groundbreaking ceremonies were held for Phase One (121 acres) of
the planned 2000 acre Capital Hills Development located in the City of
Tehachapi at the middle exit of Freeway 58 (soon to be Interstate 40) at the
Mill Street off-ramp in the center of the northern edge of the Tehachapi
Valley,  the southernmost such mountain valley of the High Sierra range.

In cooperation with one of its strategic partners, AT&T, this Phase One
property at Capital Hills has facilities for fiber optic cables along with
all underground utilities already in place.

The intent is to create a planned business, commercial, and residential
development in this quiet semi-rural area, with latest information-age high
technologies employed throughout a "Technopolis" of research parks, light
industry, office and commercial facilities, etc., where workers can live
nearby and walk, bike, or even ride horseback to work in modern facilities
out of the hectic hubub of city life such as the Los Angeles and San
Francisco Bay Area busy and distractive lifestyles that many creative
companies now are subject to.

After the groundbreaking, the 121 acres of improvements (eg. streets, curb
and sidewalks, street lights, underground utilities, etc.) were installed
for Phase One, but several factors combined to stall the development which
to date has just a few new buildings including the new Tehachapi U.S. Post
Office, an ARCO am/pm gas station and mini-mart, and a Denny's Restaurant.

The real estate market in general "went soft" after Phase One subdivision
and the city made a mistake that was discovered too late to correct in their
red tape process, where the "Mello-Roos" bond payments were structured
incorrectly in 1989 by an expert subcontracted by the City of Tehachapi
whose fees were paid by the landowners and who made a gross mathematical
error discovered by the landowners, a mistake which the city was unable or
unwilling to correct and instead insisted must be perpetuated even after the
bonds were later refinanced.  Therefore, the bond payments are much higher
(~200%) than they should be. This situation has made it harder to interest
companies to build on Phase One lands which are heading for foreclosure
procedings initiated by the City in near future to be sold off parcel by
parcel unless quickly an understanding investor comes forward to make a deal
with the owners of Capital Hills to refinance these bonds, pay back taxes,
and get Phase One back on proper economic track.  As a matter of information
over $7 million was spent on improvements on Phase One that was MAI
appraised at up to $30 million with only about $4 million total debt at this
time.

The owners of Capital Hills have offered to donate land for a new energy
technology development center as the new centerpiece to revive the vision of
the Capital Hills Technopolis. This land is just outside the Phase One area.
They have also offered to donate some of the allocated parkland to be
dedicated as a Global Peace Park and Center. The suggested location for this
is on the eastern edge of the phase one property but just outside the
boundary of the area impacted by pending foreclosure procedings. This site
is ready to go and an interim peace and new energy research facility can be
located there very quickly by placing for up to six months a non-permanent
structure (but fully wired and plumbed to the street underground utilities)
while plans are being made for permanent construction of appropriate
facilities.

Introductory information on the Capital Hills New-Energy Research and
Development Center is at http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html with
a link there to the Capital Hills Development website.

-------------end 29Sept2000 update-----------------

**
gear2000@...
David Crockett Williams, CLU
Chartered Life Underwriter
Scientist - Activist - Manager
GENERAL AGENCY SERVICES
http://www.GeneralAgencyServices.com
For your personal and financial independence

The Legal Revolution - Equal Justice for All
Free Legal Resource Center eService
http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/dcwilliams
Online legal content: FAQ, audio guides, legal forms, discussion boards.
Low-cost attorney telephone access, national prepaid legal protection plans.

Create a home-based business plan
to cut current wage income taxes by 1/3 to 1/2
with our IRS compliant Tax Relief System
http://ima.thetaxpeople.net/~dcwillms

Capital Hills New-Energy Research Center
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy list
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org

from:  [first page of papers reproduced below with link]

http://www.cseti.org

Brazilian Physics Professor releases Anti-gravity Secrets

Content peer reviewed by 36 scientists around the world and a Nobel Prize
Winner.

Also included -- 2 more papers from which can be built a 214 HP motor
powered solely by gravity, plus provides the grand unification of
gravitation and electromagnetism.

All papers displayed on Los Alamos National Laboratory Website, plus
Department of Energy awards a $600,000 Grant.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Craddock" <webmaster@...>
To: <webmaster@...>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 7:10 PM
Subject: Anti-Gravity secrets revealed by Brazilian Physics Professor


> In an amazing series of theoretical papers released this year, physics
> professor Fran De Aquino of Maranhao State University in Brazil has
> theoretically shown how to produce anti-gravity, and has successfully
> demonstrated the results on the lab bench with a device that he has built.
>
> And in two more papers released in the last month, he shows how to build a
> 215 HP motor powered solely by gravity using the principles he has already
> demonstrated, plus he provides a theoretical basis for unification of the
> gravitational and electromagnetic forces.
>
> In private email, Prof. De Aquino advises that his first paper was
> peer-reviewed by 36 scientists around the world, and that everything is
> rigorously correct.  A Nobel prize-winner also adds his endorsement.
>
> The papers, we are advised, are also carried on the Los Alamos National
> Laboratory Website, and Prof. De Aquino further indicates that he has just
> been awarded a $600,000 grant from the US Department of Energy to validate
> his, and parallel, Soviet work.
>
> All these papers, which include the plans for the Gravity Motor and the
> Anti-Gravity Disc, can be downloaded from the CSETI Website (follow the
> Link from the Front Page).
>
> The implications of all this for transportation and the biosphere are
obvious.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Craddock
> Web Administrator
> CSETI
> <http://www.cseti.org>http://www.cseti.org
>
>
>

http://www.cseti.org/position/addition/brazil%20gravity.htm
[hyperlinks in article at this site not copied in text below]

Physics Professor releases Anti-gravity Secrets

In a stunning development, Brazilian Physics Professor Fran de Aquino has
released the results of a comparatively simple experiment successfully
conducted in the laboratory at Maranhao State University earlier this year
that conclusively demonstrates anti-gravity principles.

And this is no minor league player, as Professor de Aquino has published
papers that are archived on the Los Alamos National Laboratory Website. In
addition, Brazil is one of only three Nations that possesses the
creme-de-la-creme of covert scalar EM weaponry, the fearsome quantum
potential weapons, so their science has been world class for decades.

Indeed, this is where one of the world's greatest physicists, David Bohm,
found residence after he was kicked out of the United States.

To quote from the Conclusion of Professor de Aquino's paper

"......So, we can easily conclude that the gravitational forces can be
reduced, nullified and inverted by means of electromagnetic radiation."

Click to Download Paper (Acrobat Format)

This concept has also been further developed to its logical conclusion, a
Gravitational Spacecraft, on a well-illustrated Website co-authored by
Professor de Aquino.

Don't let your eyes glaze over at the formulae, just read the narrative, and
you will get the gist of what is going on - especially when you look at the
incredible blip on the graph where the interior of the apparatus at a
specific current, to quote from the Paper,

"..... doesn't interact gravitationally with the Universe, and consequently,
there can be no gravitational interaction between the matter inside the
toroid (a doughnut shape) and the rest of the Universe."

So in the civilian sector we now pick up in the year 2000 where the
Philadelphia Experiment started in 1944 (with direct assistance from Nicola
Tesla and Albert Einstein)!

And, by the way, the results of THAT, according to a good source, will
probably be declassified in 2002.

Note: there were actually three USS "Eldridge"s -- however the vessel that
was involved in the experiment is still in storage in the US with the cable
marks still on the sides, and one of the "Eldridge"s was indeed sold to the
Greek Government as the myth has it.

Tony Craddock


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

The following is excerpted from an email from Professor Fran De Aquino
replying to a query about his recent anti-gravity revelations.

From "Fran De Aquino" <deaquino@...>
Subject En An error in your paper
Date Fri, 4 Aug 2000 165948 -0300

Dear (Name Removed)

There is no error in the paper. The trouble is that you did not understand
the experiment . Only the gravitational mass of the toroid of annealed pure
iron varies in the experiment. Thus , when I(0)=0 the total gravitational
mass of the system-G is Mg=Mi=34.85kg and the gravitational mass of the
toroid of annealed pure iron is mg=mi=1.7kg. When I(0)=100A, mg=0.6mi

(Thus, (delta)mg=0.4mi) and the total gravitational mass of the system-G is
Mg=34.85 - 0.4mi=34.85 - 0.4x1.7=34.17 kg. Did you understand now where is
your error?

My papers were reviewed by 36 scientists from all over the world. All the
equations, deductions and results were analyzed minutely. Everything is
rigorously correct .

By the way, below a transcription of an e-mail which I have received from a
Nobel Prize

"I have just read your interesting paper on the screen of my computer. It is
indeed v. interesting what you write concerning the relation between
inertial and gravitational masses. I hold this opinion for a long time now
that the last word on the m_i and m_g relation is not spoken yet. My point
was that the equality of masses is just a large N limit (a limit of an
infinte number of constituents). or what is called in condensed matter
physics `mean field' regime.  So, there should be fluctuations from the mean
and the effect should be observable in principle, if not directly. Right now
one might agree with Feynman point of view from some 40 years ago, that one
can simply `derive' GRT from another set of assumptions and let the
universality of free fall be derived and valid only in some limit..."

I would like to thank you for your e-mail and comments about my paper.

Best regards

Fran De Aquino
Physics Department
Maranhao State University/Brazil


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Prof. De Aquino writes further:

I am also sending in attachment a copy of my new paper gr-qc/00077069, which
I have posted last week in LANL . The  US Department of Energy is very
interested in the calculations and experimental results presented in my
trilogy above mentioned. Some days ago, I have received a proposal for an
exploratory R&D program for DOE transportation and basic science that would
include both theory development and experiment working in concert to
determine the benefit of this for transportation systems. (about $600K to
validate the work in Brazil and validate the work in Russia.)


How to Extract Energy Directly from a Gravitational Field (Acrobat Format)

In a direct extension of his production of elctro-gravitation on the lab
bench, Prof. Aquino shows how to manufacture what he calls a gravity motor,
that produces 215 HP powered solely by gravitation.

Gravitation and Electromagnetism:  Correlation and Unification (Acrobat
Format)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

In response to an additional query, Prof. Aquino writes:

Q:  Have you actually built a working model?  Or is the design based solely
on theory?

A: The design is based on theory and on the results obtained  with my
experimental setup (system-G) presented in my paper gr-qc/0005107. The
Gravitational Motor is based on System-G. The only difficulty to build the
gravitational motor is to manufacture the ceramic ferromagnetic material
(ferrite) mentioned in the paper. However this is  simple experimental work,
which needs only time and money. Recently a friend sent me a data sheet from
PHILIPS components with two appropriates  ferrites ( see 3E6 and 3E7 , p3 of
archive in attachment ).

---------------end forwarded article, post-------------

David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
Chartered Life Underwriter
Manager, Activist, Chemist
Tehachapi, CA  661-822-3309
gear2000@...

General Agency Services
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

DCWilliams Associates, Network Marketing Assn.
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwa

The Legal Revolution -- Justice for All
LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER -- Free legal content: FAQ, audio guides,
legal forms, discussion boards; Optional low-cost national legal protection
http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/dcwilliams

Home-based income:  Business plan also minimizes wage income taxes
using a Tax Relief System  http://www.thetaxpeople.net

Capital Hills New-Energy Research Center, Tehachapi CA
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/chrc.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Emergency! Alert! Response!
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
Updates-Voicemail 415-267-1877

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "David B. Hamilton" <David.Hamilton@...>;
"Bill Kennedy" <Bill.Kennedy@...>;
"Bob Emond" <Bob.Emond@...>;
"Department of Energy" <Exec-Sec-Central@...>
Subject: Breaking New Clean-Energy News
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 2:02 AM

Although my DOE Strategic Plan public comments extended deadline was
yesterday, this breaking news of today is suggested for your consideration
regarding suppression of valuable new clean Emerging Energy Technologies,
and a prior related article on potential breakthrough-science medical
applications.

I suggest that this information be taken into consideration in next DOE
budget proposal for your full investigation of these potential new "world
class science" applications including submissions already sent you by
yesterday and referenced at http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan

Please do all you can to see that this kind of suppression/opposition does
not stall the many of these Emerging Energy Technologies reference at above
site with potential to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, neutralize
radioactive wastes, etc.



From:
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0017/baard.shtml

Published April 26 - May 2, 2000

Dr. Randell Mills suspects outsiders tampered with his patent application.

THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK

BY ERIK BAARD

Alternative-Energy Scientist Fights to Save Patent

Dr. Randell Mills's physics and chemistry laboratories may have strangely
united three forces that were presumed distinct: the U.S. Patent and
Trademark office, the Department of State, and the American Physical
Society. Unfortunately for Mills, they appear to have united against him.

This is a case for patent-dependent Nasdaq hopefuls and their investors to
watch.

Mills, a harvard-trained medical doctor and founder of the New Jersey-based
technology start-up BlackLight Power Inc., www.blacklightpower.com, was
awarded a U.S. patent February 15 covering his claim to producing energy by
shrinking the electron orbit of hydrogen below what most quantum theorists
have thought possible for a century. He calls the smaller hydrogen atom a
"hydrino" and theorizes it could lead to a nearly limitless supply of clean,
cheap power (see "Quantum Leap"
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/9951/baard.shtml and "Doctor Molecool"
below)

The news outraged Mills's fiercest critic, Dr. Robert Park, an APS spokesman
and avid debunker based in Washington, D.C. Park mocked the patent decision
in the press and in his What's New column at www.aps.org. The column comes
with a disclaimer that states, "Opinions are the author's and are not
necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be."

Within days, the patent office pulled back a related chemistry patent for
further review just before issuance, citing comments by Park and others-none
of whom has tested Mills's devices or materials-in mainstream press reports
that Mills must be either wildly mistaken or a fraud. That patent
application, number 09/009,294, was so near issuance that it slipped out in
the PTO's weekly Gazette of allowances as Patent No. 6,030,601.

Mills says Park may have more than the safeguarding of science at heart.
"Park's group is lobbying the government to give them billions of dollars
for 'big science' projects that BlackLight's success would make obsolete.
He's a competitor," says Mills, who is privately funded. "I know it's not
completely analogous, but going to him would be like the patent office going
to Bill Gates and asking, 'Do you think Apple's new operating platform will
work?' "

With the novel hydrino chemistry, Mills says he's developed and had outside
testing of the prototype for what could be a vastly superior class of
batteries. He also claims to have developed compounds for plastic magnetic
storage media and rustproof coatings, also with many independent lab
verifications.

Mills's lawyers won an agreement from the patent office not to act on the
chemistry application until June while the U.S. District Court examines the
case. Meanwhile, Mills continues to take a beating at the agency, which took
his artificial-intelligence patent application away from an examiner who'd
been reviewing it for over a year and placed it in the hands of another, who
quickly rejected it. The office also rejected his patent application for a
hydrino power plant. Mills says he'll contest both decisions.

The 69-year-old Park and 42-year-old Mills have never met, but Park has
blasted Mills since he proposed his theory nine years ago. In March, Mills's
lawyers warned Park and three other scientists to refrain from calling him a
fraud, even if they continue to denounce his theories. "Scientific debate is
sacred-no one wants to silence that," Mills says. "But when you try to
incriminate a business, you've crossed the line. Still, in a way I'm glad
about this. It forces the issue. Now we'll have to put up or shut up, and
they'll have to confront the data or fold." Mills says he's going to back up
his filings with the patent office with more than 40 reports and
publications, and he may request that the National Institute of Science and
Technology test his prototype technologies.

Park says he doesn't know where Mills is on what he calls "the road from
foolishness to fraud," because "the human capacity for self-deception should
never be underestimated." Of course, he offers, even with a crank theory
"there's room for serendipity, but I wouldn't bet on it."

Threats to the hydrino patents could jeopardize Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's
plans to underwrite BlackLight's estimated billion dollar initial public
offering. And some of BlackLight's backers say they're offended when
portrayed as dupes or coconspirators.

"If I wanted to gamble, I'd fly to Vegas," says Rick Barry, whose Eastbourne
Capital Management and its principals invested $5 million in BlackLight
after what he describes as "detailed" due dilligence by him and PacifiCorp.
"I don't think the risk [with Mills] is science fraud. It's can he engineer
a device and can he protect his intellectual property? I thought we were
safe on the latter until this started to unfold."

Along with PacifiCorp, electric utility Conectiv has invested in BlackLight.
Tyco International inherited a sliver stake in the company through its
purchase of Amp Incorporated, a leading producer of electrical connectors.
Individual backers are among the Who's Who of the business establishment.
They include a former chairman of Morgan Stanley and a former president of
PaineWebber. Board members include Dr. Shelby Brewer, a former top
Department of Energy nuclear official, and Aris Melissaratos, former
director of Westinghouse's Science and Technology Center.

So while BlackLight doesn't have the resources of the entire physics
establishment, it has more pull than most start-ups. Its travails at the
patent office have even attracted attention on Capitol Hill.

Responding to evidence presented by allies of BlackLight, senators Ron Wyden
of Oregon and Max Cleland of Georgia say they want to know if an American
Physical Society colleague of Park's at the State Department messed with
Mills's application. One indication of outside influence noted by BlackLight
attorney Jeffrey Melcher was that the patent office says it had lost the
file when it ruled on the chemistry application. "That's not normal for an
agency," says a Senate source. "If there's no record, how can you make a
decision?"

The source says there may have been some improper contact by outside
influences with patent officials, and points to Park's APS associate Dr.
Peter Zimmerman, chief arms-control scientist at the State Department.
Zimmerman boasted in an abstract for an upcoming APS lecture that "my own
Department and the Patent Office have fought back with success" against
"pseudoscientists," but didn't name his targets. His abstract railed
against, among other things, inventors of "hydrinos."

A State Department official, who declined to be identified, said Zimmerman's
abstract, which has since been removed, was missing a disclaimer explaining
that he was speaking only as a private citizen. The official added that
department employees are not allowed to use their titles outside of their
official capacities. "The topic is totally outside our purview and mandate,"
the official said. "His views did not reflect those of the State
Department."

Park and Zimmerman have certainly affected patent-office affairs before.
Patent Examiner Tom Valone http://users.erols.com/iri was invited by the
State Department to organize an April 1999 Conference on Free Energy to
explore alternatives to fossil fuels, many of which were controversial.
Zimmerman told an APS gathering that Park asked him to put a stop to it.

"The week before I was to start [at the State Department] Bob [Park] sends
me an e-mail, in which he tells me in some detail about the Conference on
Free Energy under the sponsorship of the Secretary of State's Open Forum. It
says, 'Pete, if you can't get that killed, what's the point of having you at
the State Department?' "

Listen to Speech Clips
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0017/baard.ram
(clips provided by Infinite Energy magazine)

The conference was evicted from the State Department auditorium and then
from the Department of Commerce.

Park says he then called "an investigative reporter" who writes for Science,
suggesting he look into the patent office. The reporter, APS physicist David
Voss, wrote a scathing article in the magazine's May 1999 issue describing
Valone's personal interest in novel theories, while acknowledging he never
approved patents with questionable backing. Nonetheless, Valone says the
report contributed to his dismissal.

Mills has his own battles to wage. "We intend to fight this all the way to
the Supreme Court," he says, "and enlist whatever resources it takes in
Congress and industry to rightfully win this."

From:
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0004/baard.shtml

Published January 26 - February 1, 2000

DR. MOLECOOL
BY ERIK BAARD
Quantum Iconoclast Randell Mills's Grand Visions of Microscopic Medicine

Randell Mills is a doctor better known for stirring up trouble in quantum
physics than for giving flu shots. But now he's injecting new vigor into
medical projects he claims will spur breakthroughs in fighting cancer and
AIDS, as well as scanning the human body in three dimensions, in real time.

"You'll go in to see your doctor and he'll check you out with my scanner,"
Mills predicts. "If he finds cancer, you'll be treated for it as an
outpatient with my therapy. If he finds something else-hypertension, an
infection, arthritis-almost any medicine that he'll use will be more
efficacious when he uses my drug-delivery molecule."

Mills is the founder of BlackLight Power Inc., based near Princeton, New
Jersey. The company promises limitless clean energy and fantastic compounds,
based on a "grand unified theory" that is hotly derided by luminaries in
theoretical physics (see "Quantum Leap," Voice, December 28). Meanwhile, in
a smaller laboratory down the hallway from those activities, Mills is
quietly exploring medical innovations that no one seems to be calling nutty.

Mills says he plans to fold his medical ventures into BlackLight Power after
that company has its initial public offering of stock, anticipated this
year. Profits would then be plowed into his medical pursuits, he adds. "To
me it's all the same; it's all engineering," says Mills.

Mills conceived many of his ideas while a student at Harvard Medical School
or shortly after he graduated in 1986. Now 42, he acknowledges that it might
seem odd that he backburnered early successes in medicine. He says he wanted
to milk his brain while it was young and most nimble without the
distractions of business or university politics. Today, he's ready to
implement his designs.

In December 1988, Mills proposed in the peer-reviewed journal Nature how
cancer might be destroyed with such little radiation that it could be
treated on an outpatient basis. He says he was moved to improve cancer
treatment when, as a student, he witnessed the private hopelessness of
doctors caring for an otherwise healthy woman who was being slowly ravaged
by tumors.

Currently, patients are carpet bombed with radiation in the hope that normal
cells adjacent to cancer cells will be able to recover and reproduce, while
malfunctioning cancer cells won't. Patients suffer terribly and injuries
from repeated radiation can accumulate to a point where the cure itself
threatens to become a killer. What Mills tested in mice were essentially the
world's smallest smart bombs.

Dr. Greg Gagnon, assistant professor of radiation medicine at Georgetown
University Medical Center, has investigated Mills's radiation technique,
called Mossbauer Isotopic Resonant Absorption of Gamma Emission, or MIRAGE.
Gagnon says Mills found a molecule to carry iron into a cell and plant it
flush against DNA, the control center. Then comes the detonation.

The patient is given a tiny dose of gamma radiation, far less than a
standard X ray. The gamma ray photons and iron atoms are tuned to react with
each other in something called the Mossbauer isotope. When an iron nucleus
absorbs a photon, it becomes unstable and releases a small burst of energy
that knocks an electron out of its proper orbit, which then bumps outer
electrons astray. What follows is an Auger cascade, a kind of
microscopically localized electron explosion, Gagnon explains. "The
electrons are shooting off, breaking things all over the place, and then the
iron becomes attached to the DNA fragments. There's no way a cell can repair
so much damage."

Healthy cells tear apart the transport molecule and the iron drifts safely
off.

"It's just an amazingly clever idea. Randy is probably the most intelligent
person I've met," remarks Gagnon.

Dr. John Humm, a medical physicist now at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center who critiqued MIRAGE in Nature, argues that because such mild gamma
rays wouldn't likely penetrate deep into tissue, "there would be severe
limitations on clinical use. But having said that, this is nothing to sneeze
at. The elegance of the idea is impressive. I know of no other way of so
selectively inactivating sections of DNA." Scientists might instead embrace
MIRAGE as a laboratory-setting microscopic cellular probe, Humm says.

Mills counters that while MIRAGE may not work for every cancer, in the years
since the Nature article, he's found other Mossbauer isotopes that can work
at deeper levels. In addition, he says, the radiation used in his original
tests was so negligible that he could increase it by a factor of 1000
without any resulting discomfort to the patient.

Back then, Mills took a stab at bringingMIRAGE to hospitals, but researchers
at would-be partner Bristol-Myers Squibb reported that test results weren't
clear enough to pursue, according to M. Dianne DeFuria, senior director of
business development.

DeFuria doesn't remember details, but adds that another factor could have
been that the radiation therapy "may have involved equipment beyond the
scope of a pharmaceutical company, meaning that we couldn't take it further
alone."

Mills says he's since sharpened his technique to use ultrasound or magnetic
scanners to take aim at malignant growths, and then destroy them with gamma
rays pixel by pixel on a computer screen. Beyond that, he adds, "you should
really think of this as a microscopic scalpel" good for cleaning out
arteries and reducing swollen prostates, among other applications.

"If Randy is now meeting with good success, I hope he will come back,"
DeFuria says. "His mind was certainly appreciated here."

Mills has also demonstrated what might be a better way to use existing drugs
to attack AIDS, herpes, and hepatitis. One of the problems doctors have in
fighting these diseases is that the drugs best able to halt viruses and
bacteria from reproducing often have trouble getting past cell membranes.
They can be modified for that purpose, but that usually means dumbing down
the medicinal value or causing side effects. Also, toxic concentrations of
drugs must sometimes be used in hope that enough will get through.

Mills has designed a type of nontoxic molecule to ferry unadulterated drugs
into cells, says Dr. Jim A. Turpin, who manages a retrovirology lab at
Serquest, a Southern Research Institute company.

In Mills's approach, a drug enters the body as part of a molecule with three
segments. Once past the membrane, the molecule will more likely encounter
oxygen-free radicals, created during respiration, which exist inside cells
in far greater numbers than outside.

The radical excites the first section of the three-part molecule in a
chemical reaction that should release a photon of light. But that light is
instead channeled as bond-shattering disruptive energy running along the
molecular carrier, which then falls away like the spent stage of a rocket.
The drug is left alone to do its work, and the carrier is excreted as waste.

Mills calls his system the Luminide method, because the carrier "is a
light-powered drug-release molecule based on a reaction analogous to that
used by fireflies to glow," and "it just sounds cool."

Turpin tested the technique on HIV-infected white blood cells using the AIDS
drug Foscarnet. With the Luminide carrier, "we measured a minimum ninefold
enhancement of antiviral activity in tissue culture," Turpin says.

Mills says he and Turpin will submit apaper on their findings to The Journal
of Medicinal Chemistry in February. Tests in mice with Dupont Corporation
have been successful, Mills claims, and he plans further studies in animals
and humans. He adds that the method could be used for a host of
applications, from antidepressants to plant pesticides, but purifying the
compounds is difficult.

The National Institutes of Health may be interested in getting behind that
effort with its own manpower and resources. When presented with Luminide
overview materials for an opinion, Dr. Nava Sarver, chief of NIH's targeted
intervention branch in the Division of AIDS, was "a little more impressed
than I thought I would be. There seems to be some real potential there."

Sarver explains that her program helps scientists develop cutting-edge
technologies without taking any profits or making patent claims. Luminide
molecules appear to be suitable for oral administration, Sarver says, and
"anything that increases potency and decreases toxicity is a go."

Sarver cautions that many promising ideas stumble in the final steps of
clinical testing.

For Luminide to be closer to an ideal approach to treating AIDS, Sarver says
she'd like to "tweak" it with Mills to target only infected cells or
systems. "Specificity is the missing link here."

Immunologist Dr. Gillian Woollett of Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America agrees that targeting will be important. "It's a
neat idea and there will be a lot of companies keen to talk with him. But he
has some hurdles ahead of him."

If clinical trials for one drug are positive, Woollett says, "Maybe the
floodgates will open. And AIDS is not a bad place to start. This system
seems especially good for use in blood, and oxygen-free radicals are used
most by the immune system."

But AIDS and other infections aren't the most likely killers lurking in
peoples' bodies, Mills points out.

"Let me tell you how you're going to die," he casually offers. "I'll say
you're going to die of heart disease, cancer, or a stroke, and I'll be right
95 percent of the time."

That's why Mills has another project in the works at Harvard that he says
could revolutionize diagnostic medical imaging.

"The guy is amazing," remarks Dr. Samuel Patz, an assistant professor at
Harvard Medical School, with an appointment in the Department of Radiology
at the university's Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.

"I've worked with him on his medical inventions and he's contributed some
nontrivial creative ideas about a new imaging technique. It's very exciting
and has some real possibilities," Patz says.

Today's scanners work best by giving doctors two-dimensional snapshots of
the human body. Mills claims he's designing a scanner that may, for example,
allow a surgeon to take a live-image virtual reality walking tour through a
patient's beating heart (it could also be used to scan industrial
materials).

Mills expounds. "The machine would work by distinguishing differences made
in the magnetic field at a location by the material itself, like bone versus
lung." Data would stream into a computer through parallel channels from up
to a million points, providing far sharper relief than anything currently
available.

And if a strongly magnetic substance like iron were added to the
bloodstream, through an injection of Geritol for example, "the vascular
system would light up." That would allow a doctor and patient to see blood
vessels growing to feed a tumor, or clots and cholesterol, without any
invasion.

"After seeing this, you wouldn't eat that cheesecake if I told you not to,"
Mills quips.

The calculations involved are Herculean, says Patz, but "Randy has worked
out the mathematics. I'm convinced of that."

Because the scanner would largely rely on existing hardware, "if someone
like a General Electric were to get behind this, we could have a prototype i
n six months," Mills says.

Despite Mills's grand ambitions, he admits to being vexed by complexities in
a genetic sequencer he envisions, and he dismisses dreams of immortality.

"Life is probably limited by arterial flow in the brain. Those vessels wear
out. Maybe someone will find a way of drilling out and retubing them, but
then they'll find something else. There's always a weak link."

------------------


David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

FreeService: Money by Email
https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=gear2000%40lightspeed.net

Easy way to Email Media and Government
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
Updates/Voicemail  415-267-1877

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/prop1/petition.html

USCampaign  gear2000@...
DCWilliams for President, Leonard Peltier for VP
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

"An Agenda for Peace", one Global Peace Walk support letter
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html

The Vision of Paradise on Earth, DCWilliams
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: ""Bob Emond"" <Bob.Emond@...>
Cc: <Bill.Kennedy@...>; "DOE-StrategicPlan"
<StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: : *by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Monday, April 24, 2000 9:09 PM

Mr. Emond,

Thanks for this additional time and I have just today finished sending in to
StrategicPlan@... my additional public comments including information
sent to you at my request and on my behalf by a few other researchers,
copies of all of which that I am aware of have been also posted by this date
and time for your review and public record at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan

I very much appreciate your extending me this consideration and hope that
this information I have been able to contribute will help in achieving DOE
goals as outlined in Strategic Plan draft.

Sincerely,

David Crockett Williams
661-822-3309
20411 Steeple Court
Tehachapi, CA 93561


From: "Bob Emond" <Bob.Emond@...>
To: <gear2000@...>
Cc: <Bill.Kennedy@...>
Subject: Re: *by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:07 AM

Thank you for your [*]note.  We agree to extend the comment period for your
comments to April 24, 2000.

In pursuit of our goal to seek public comment we issued a press release
February 24, 2000; notified our key stakeholders and other key interest
groups (approximately 1400) by mail; placed a notice on the DOE homepage for
the duration of the comment period; and used other public forums (for
example the newsletter you received).  The success of our outreach is
measured in part by the several thousand downloads of the draft plan on our
web-site.  In this number are several hundred visits by the public which
were simply not possible until the recent availability of this technology.

The Comprehensive National Energy Strategy of 1998 is fully integrated into
the draft plan.  Anyone who contributed to that public process has already
made significant contributions to the draft plan.  We have a continuing
interest in your comments and look forward to your response by April 24.

Thanks

Bob

===================

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: The "Consciousness Factor" & energy/matter relationship in modern
science
Date: Monday, April 24, 2000 7:31 PM

[after this post is sent on today's deadline, further developments, info,
and discussions on this topic, issues mentioned below, and related posts
will be publicly available at Science and Technology in Society and Public
Policy project list website at http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams ]


The "Consciousness Factor" & energy/matter relationship in modern science

Tetron Thesis, intro & summary, 24April2000

In the preceding decades it has become fairly well accepted in physics that
there exists in the matter/energy relationship at a fundamental level some
kind of "consciousness factor" yet to be fully understood, but whose
influence and evaluation/quantification is an important topic of discussion
in quantum and post-quantum physics today.

Seventeen years ago, prominent American theoretical physicist John Archibald
Wheeler, in an article in Science '83, a public audience magazine, was
quoted as saying that he felt the relationship of mind/consciousness between
observer and observed was then the forefront area of research in modern
theoretical physics.

Today taking a different approach, mathematically representing mind as a
"mental field" property of matter itself and consciousness as a
"back-action" of matter on mind, recent experimental and theoretical
advances in neurosciences considering "quantum effects" have been
synthesized with an integrated understanding of accepted physics
theory by PhD theoretical physicist Jack Sarfatti into his
post-quantum physics of consciousness theory whose
equations and their predicted results correspond as of now with
experimental observations on several key points.  He feels that this
understanding will lead to technological advances such as nanotechnology for
not only ultra-high-speed but also "conscious" computer chips with many
applications now being developed under private contract including control of
advanced space-drive propulsion systems, with the potential understanding of
new energy technologies such as those to perhaps harness the Zero Point
Energy field of the quantum vacuum fluctuations forthcoming as a useful
byproduct of this new physics under development presently
http://www.stardrive.org

Independently convinced from his own experiences and studies that some kind
of  "consciousness factor" is an important "missing link" consideration in
the full evaluation, understanding, and development of these new-energy
(sometimes so-called "free energy") technologies to replace nuclear and
fossil fuel power (such as those to harness ZPE), Dr. Brian O'Leary's views,
as do mine, take into account his personal witness of various strong "psi
phenomena" including psychokinesis and the direct materialization of
physical objects by certain few observers/adepts whose mind/consciousness
cosmology apparently empowers these abilities. http://www.maui.net/~oleary

Dr. Shiugi Inomata of Japan Psychotronics Institute, whose work and
experiments with DePalma's n-Machine are discussed in O'Leary's book on
these topics called Miracle in the Void, goes so far as to posit
consciousness itself (equating it to the Chi or Qi of Eastern cosmologies)
as analogous to a bridge between energy and matter.

Whatever it is and however it may be ultimately understood by physicists,
this "consciousness factor" appears to operate in physics in seemingly
subtle but perhaps no less powerful ways than how the "power of faith and
belief" seems to operate in religion, religious "miracles", faith healings,
psychoimmunology, telepathy, "synchronicities", etc.

It is my position that this "consciousness factor" can also be responsible
for some inconsistencies of experimental observations of the same
matter/energy systems between different honest, capable, and qualified
observers whose "minds" actually unknowingly influence the dynamics of the
system of reality under observation causing some of the variations in
results.

The balance of this post is copied from a few webpages I have posted with
discussion of my "Tetron Thesis" (or Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory)
whose equations were formulated between 1974-77 and based on which I have
been predicting, since 1976 without known precedent, the availability,
subsequent to their understanding by the global scientific community, of
advanced human capabilities and new technologies including these new
"fuel-less" energy technologies, "electro-gravi-magnetic-levitation
vehicles", devices to neutralize radioactive wastes, the water transmitter,
and biomedical remediation (healing) technologies.   Over the past 25years I
have heard about others whose research seems to support these predictions
but widespread public development of these I feel still awaits the "paradigm
shift" available from the understanding of this thesis which
challenges/corrects one of the most fundamental preceptoral assumptions of
modern science, the notion that all sytems of reality are independently and
identically observable by all observers exclusive of variations in "observer
relative identity" (ie, the "minds" of the observers).

Acknowledging that only one scientist in the last 25years, DePalma, has ever
told me that he understood my "theory", while others ignore it as
inconsequential and Dr. Sarfatti has yet to give its basic premise more than
a not-even-wrong (worse than wrong) "grade", I offer its introduction now
for the record and for future consideration, perhaps on a "when all else
fails" basis.  :-)

Tetron, in this thesis, is conceptualized as "the human mind's consciousness
orientation function of light" definitional consequent to the corrected
understanding of the full meaning of the C^2 in E=mC^2.

------------------------

http://www.egroups.com/message/dcwilliams/3

From: David Crockett Williams  <gear2000@...>
Date: Thu Apr 13, 2000 9:12am
Subject: Tetron (TNUFT) Equations, historical version of Feb96

The attached efax file contains two pages, the first page contains the
equations of the tetron hypothesis, or Tetron Thesis, which I have called
the Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory since 1974, and the second page
contains the explanation of the new symbols used in these equations although
in this Feb96 rendering a couple of these are somewhat fuzzy due to
raindrops.  Before too long I will post a clearer version of this page at
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams where if you see listed among
message index one with "Subject:  Tetron (TNUFT) Equations, clearer version
of ...." you may see these updates for clarification of symbols.

Scientifically speaking this is an hypothesis still to be properly verified
by experiment.

Generically speaking in terms of language used in public conversations this
is a theory in the sense not of some "half baked idea" or belief, but a
serious and internally consistent attempt to describe the operation of what
I call the human mind's consciousness orientation function of light, called
Tetron, in a way that addresses the answer to the question it purports to
answer, ie, "what is it that is wrong with the way humanity understands the
nature of faith and belief, and how can this misunderstanding be corrected
in order to advance human understanding and capabilities?"

In the vernacular of religious or spiritual discussions this is an attempt
in the language of mathematics to render into a scientifically usable format
an understanding of "The Law", the natural law, the Law by which in Judaic
tradition even God must operate in the world and cannot contradict, the
"Wonderful/Mysterious Law" inherent in the Eastern concept of Dharma.

In using this terminology variously regarding this Tetron Thesis, there will
likely be ongoing controversy among those who hold various different
definitions of "hypothesis", "theory", and "law", so this brief prelude is
an attempt to address this potential problem to understanding the essence of
these equations which might be best described as:   The "absolute identity"
of observer and observed is separated or delineated in our three dimensional
world of physical reality by the human mind's consciousness orientation
function of light, Tetron, which is defined as the correction factor
(function) that when applied to the C in E=mC^2 corrects and completes its
meaning to include consideration of the "relative nature of reality"
extant/operational via the operation of the human mind and variations in the
relative identity (eg, "belief systems, etc.) of the observer.

When I completed the first three of these equations in late July 1974 in
process of applying for the interdisciplinary PhD program in Chemical
Physics at the University of California at Santa Barbara, a program I did
not undertake in favor of an independent and intuitive path of research
until present time, I realized that I would spend the rest of my life trying
to explain in words what the essence of their meaning is.

By 1976 their insight gave inspiration for me to begin predicting various
new post-Atomic-Age technologies (ie, Tetronic Age technologies) some of
which have begun to come to pass in the ensuing years but none of which is
yet in common use due, in my view, to the present lack of general scientific
understanding and acceptance of the principles described by this Tetron
Thesis.

A writeup on this thesis is at [below]
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron.html

The attachment to this post contains these equations on a special paper
background that makes this file shaded and therefore longer than it should
properly be so if you find a listing for a "clearer" version as per url
first shown above, I suggest you skip the below version without opening and
go to the clearer one.

To open and read efax files you must first once download a small microreader
program available free from http://www.efax.com/need and then click on the
attachment bar at bottom of the post.

This efax attachment below of the tetron thesis equations is labeled
[eaanaan5.efx (292KB)].
http://www.egroups.com/message/dcwilliams/3
[see attachment bar at bottom of post at this url for efax file of
equations]

David Crockett Williams  gear2000@l...

---------------end of post copied from url immediately above----




http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/velocity.html
Tetron Thesis Warmup (Starting Point)

Opening Discussion of the True Nature of Light as it defines a Relative
Reality Reference Frame and a Human Mind Consciousness Factor

"It is the conceptualizations that are important in science"

The notion of the "exclusively objective nature of reality independent of
the identity of the observer" is so deeply ingrained in all of science,
since its recognized beginning with Galileo's dropping of the big rock and
the small rock from the tower of Pisa, that a more useful conceptualization
of a mathematical description of the meaning of the observed constant value
of C in E=mC^2 may have been overlooked and its significance buried under
cover of "mathematical convention".

If we examine the actual physical observations of this quantity C, it may
become clearer why I am maintaining that this quantity is more than the
scalar value of the speed of light "pegged" to the notion of an external
exclusively "objective reality reference frame" but rather C is more
accurately conceptualized as a unique "vector" quantity defining a "relative
reality reference frame" that is "pegged" to the central point of this frame
which can be seen as the relative identity of the observer.

Following is the logic by which one may understand why I am maintaining that
a more correct (functionally useful) conceptualization is one in which C is
describable as "the velocity of light oriented relative to the identity of
the observer" where the directional orientation may be described relative to
the "vector point of awareness" of the observer.

For those educated in science and holding firmly to the idea that C is
nothing more than the scalar value of the speed of light, the following
paragraphs describing this conceptualization that I am trying to clarify
here will be unconvincing and perhaps even, as Dr. Jack Sarfatti has
reacted, "not even wrong" (beyond wrong). However, if one keeps in mind the
possibility of some value underlying this proposition that C is the only
physical measurement parameter that is in fact "pegged to the identity of
the observer", and recognizes this as a genuine attempt (supported by other
realms of epistemological evidence discussed elsewhere on this website) by
someone (this writer) with a mathematical vocabulary limited to studies only
through the level of a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry, then it is
possible that such a person can grasp the essence of the value of this
thesis and perhaps help to refine and expand the vocabulary, precision and
accuracy of its verbal description. The underlying idea here is that this
conceptualization may be the starting point for a deeper understanding of a
mathematically describable relationship of mind ("consciousness factor")
between observer and observed. This "starting point" can be identified by
recognizing the potential usefulness of conceptualizing a relative reality
reference frame centered by the point in time/space of the "point of
awareness of the observer".

A simple example to describe the observable nature of C is to consider the
following example. In the case of two observers, one standing stationary on
the ground (observer G) and one in a jet airplane (observer J) flying on a
level path overhead of the observer G at some height, say 1000 feet
altitude, and travelling in some direction, say North, if, as the jet passes
overhead of G, it fires a bullet forward from a gun mounted on the jet, and
the observer J in the jet were to measure the speed of the bullet as it
leaves the gunbarrel as say X meters per second (this means a velocity of X
meters per second North, velocity being a vector so including both amplitude
of speed and direction of movement), the velocity of the bullet relative to
the observer G on the ground would be the sum of the muzzle velocity of (X
m/s North) + (Y m/s North) where (Y m/s) is the speed of the jet.

Similarly, if the bullet were to be fired backwards (South) from the jet,
the observer J in the jet would notice the speed relative to J to be (X m/s)
but the velocity would be (X m/s South). The speed of the bullet relative to
the observer G on the ground would be the difference between the speed of
the bullet leaving the gunbarrel and the speed of the jet [(X-Y) m/s]. The
velocity of the bullet relative to G would be [(X-Y) m/s (North if X >Y, or
South if Y>X)]. Simply stated the velocities are "additive".

If the bullet were to be fired at some angle between North and South, using
simple geometry one could calculate the measurable amplitude and direction
of the different bullet velocities relative to J and G but "by convention"
the objective reality reference frame direction of the velocity vector for
each observer would be the same. So there would be different velocities
observed for the bullet for each J and G (because speed amplitude would be
different relative to each observer while ojective reality reference frame
directions are the same, i.e., velocity is different if either amplitude or
direction is different).

The discussion in the above three paragraphs briefly summarizes the ideas of
objective vs relative reality reference frames.

This principle of additivity is not applicable in the case of light. If,
instead of a bullet, the jet fires a strobe light burst, no matter in which
direction, the scalar value of the speed of the strobe light burst
travelling in the air would be the same value relative to each observer,
this is the principle behind the observed "constant value of the speed of
light" which in vacuum is designated as the C in E=mC^2. However, C can thus
be seen from the above described example as a very peculiar and unique
physical reality measurement parameter and it may be more deeply
conceptualized as the "velocity of light irrespective of direction oriented
relative to the identity of the observer", or perhaps even better described
by another set of words to explain this unique property of it being a
"vector" "pegged" to the identity of the observer.

When a velocity vector quantity is squared, multiplied by itself, by
"mathematical convention", i.e., "since we can't mentally grasp or
understand what it means, we assume for all intents and purposes that", it
is taken to mean the same as the square of the scalar value of its speed
only. The value of the square of the direction component of the velocity
vector is "ignored" by "mathematical convention". This is equivalent to
physicists using math that says that because we can't understand the meaning
or true mathematical value of the square of a direction, we assume (or
accept by "mathematical convention") that it is equal to one. For example,
if we square the speed of 10m/s we get 100m^2/s^2. If we square [10m/s
North] (a velocity) we get [100m^2/s^2 (North)^2]. By this same
"mathematical convention" it is accepted that "because we can't mentally
grasp or understand the meaning or value of (North)^2, we assume (accept by
"mathematical convention") that for all intents and purposes it is equal to
one".

Whoever can appreciate that this idea of "mathematical convention" as
applied in the above discussions may really be a compromise about the nature
of truth itself and also about the true nature of light, such person may be
able to understand the balance of the Tetron thesis, from this starting
point, as an attempt to correct and complete the understanding of E=mC^2 as
the equivalence equation, or "proportionality equation" by which the value
of the energy (E) of any given sytem of reality under observation is
proportional to the product of the mass (m) of that system and the quantity
(C^2), from which we can define the physical and mathematically describable
values of both the relative identity of the observer and the relative
identity of the system of reality under observation.

David Crockett Williams 12May99



http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron1.html
Introduction to the Tetron Thesis

This short introduction was written a few years ago in text form which does
not allow the display of the equations symbols.

The four Tetron Thesis equations were posted 13Apr2000 with additional
information at my Science-in-Society & Science-and-Public-Policy list
archive
http://www.egroups.com/message/dcwilliams/3 (body of that post is above)


THE TETRON THESIS
This is an attempt to describe the operation of natural law, in the form of
the equations of a testable unified field theory (herein defined as a simple
set of equations describing all of physical reality, all events in nature no
matter where or when, with a probability of one, i.e., 100% certainty). This
"theory" is a simple set of mathematical equations whose conclusion is the
absolute identity of observer and observed, and whose hypothesis is that the
definitional character of the human mind delineates each observable reality,
relative to the identity of the observer, through the operation of Tetron,
which can be grasped as strongly by our thinking as arithmetic, algebra or
geometry. Tetron very simply is the operator which has the meaning of the
square of a direction oriented relative to the identity of the observer. The
recognition, acceptance, and fuller understanding of Tetron as the human
mind's consciousness consciousness orientation funtion of light means the
end of the Atomic Age and the beginning of the Tetronic Age of true peace,
harmony among all life and free natural abundance as paradise on earth.


Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory

The Tetron Thesis is a correction and completion of present day
interpretations of Einstein's principle of the equivalence of energy and
mass (that the value of the energy of any given system of reality under
observation is equal to the product of the mass of that system and the
square of the quanitity "C"). "C" is widely considered to be the constant
value of the speed of light. However, more correctly stated, it is in fact
the velocity of light (a vector) which has a constant value irrespective of
direction oriented relative to the observer.

[see above intro from http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/velocity.html]

That is to say, it is the only physical reality measurement parameter which
is "pegged" not to the notion of an objective reality reference frame, but
is "pegged" to the identity of the observer (the observer's vector point of
awareness). This distinction would seem irrelevant here if one accepts the
"mathematical convention" that the value of the square of a direction is
simply equal to one, hence the value of the square of a vector like "C" is
just the scalar value of the square of the speed of light. For example, if
we look at the square of the speed of ten miles per hour, we get one hundred
miles squared per hour squared. If we consider the value of the square of
the vector ten miles per hour North, we get one hundred miles squared per
hour squared North squared. To accept the present day "mathematical
convention" that "North squared" is equal to one is to say that because we
can't mentally grasp or understand what "North squared" really means, we
assume that for all intents and purposes it is equal to one. Apparently,
before this time no one has challenged this "convention" with regard to "C".

The Tetron Thesis begins with this challenge. To assume that the square of
the velocity of light oriented to a given observer is the same as the value
of the square of the speed of light, is to ignore the importance of its
value in defining a "relative reality reference frame". This could be called
not only a fundamental compromise about the nature of light, but also a
fundamental compromise about the nature of truth itself, at the cornerstone
of modern science, the fallacious assumption that physcial reality is
exclusively objective in nature.


The first two equations of the Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory define an
expansion of terms where "Tetra" represents the identity of the system of
reality under observation, "Psi" represents the identity of the observer and
"Tetron" is the mathematical function which, when it operates on the scalar
value of the square of the speed of light, describes the correct value of
the square of the velocity of light oriented to observer "Psi". That is: (1)
The expression "the value of the energy of any given system of reality under
observation is equal to the product of the mass of that system and the
square of the speed of light" (E equals m times C squared) is more correctly
described by the expression "the value of the energy of any given system of
reality under observation is equal to the product of the mass of that system
and the square of the velocity of light oriented to the observer" (E
sub-Tetra equals m sub-Tetra times C-dot sub-Psi squared), where (2) C-dot
sub-Psi squared is defined identically equal to Tetron operating on C
squared. Thusly, Tetron is introduced to represent a light correction factor
as the mathematical operator which "adds back", to C^2, the concept of the
square of the direction of light oriented relative to the observer. So far
this is nothing hypothetical.

The hypothesis here is: (3) That the identity of the system of reality under
observation is equal to Tetron operating on the identity of the observer
(Tetra equals Tetron of Psi). This means that Tetron is the human mind's
consciousness orientation function of light, the mathematical relationship
of mind between observer and observed. The great challenge ahead is the
quantification of identical dynamic measurement parameters for observer and
observed, which will be the pre-requisite for testing this hypothesis.

The concluding equation of the Tetron Thesis is that beyond the definitional
character of the human mind, that observer and observed are absolutely
identically equal, All is One (Psi is absolutely identically equal to
Tetra).


DC Williams short bio info
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/dwilliams.html

More Williams bio background
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/dcwbio.html

Detailed Williams autobio draft through 1979
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/history.html

-------end copied & reformatted webpages--------------

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
Bachelor of Science, Chemistry (with honors) 1969
California State University at Northridge

General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
Updates/Voicemail  415-267-1877

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

The Vision of Paradise on Earth, DCWilliams
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@...>; "Brian O'Leary" <oleary@...>;
"Stephen Kaplan" <Kap808@...>
Subject: Kaplan & O'Leary on The New Energy Revolution, Miracle in the Void
Date: Monday, April 24, 2000 12:46 PM

Forwarding Note to DoE Strategic Plan staff:

This comprehensive overview article's website is referenced in my earlier
Strategic Plan public comments submission but to make absolutely sure you
see this information I am copying and forwarding it from the site address
below for your consideration.

Because I didn't notice them among this articles selected references I want
to add here at the beginning:   http://www.projectearth.com for Adam Trombly
for his work in global climate change modeling, and in this new-energy area
since the early 1980's when he internationally patented the Trombly-Kahn
Closed Path Homopolar Generator, and for his reportedly operational since
1991 solid state oscillating/resonating electromagnetic system "overunity"
electricity generation device, both he claims harnessing the Zero Point
Energy Field;  and http://www.depalma.pair.com for the work of the late
Bruce DePalma whose forefront experimental work in the 1970's documenting
previously unsuspected changes in gravitational, inertial, and
electromagnetic properties of spinning vs non-spinning objects, which led to
his n-Machine overunity homopolar generator principle, is only now being
seriously investigated for potential reconciliation with advanced
theoretical physics "torsion field" and other hypotheses by a network
facilitated by Dr. Jack Sarfatti http://www.stardrive.org who is working on
advanced propulsion systems and forefront post-quantum physics of
consciousness theory applications to "conscious computers".


-----dcw---


http://www.connexion.org/kaplan

MIRACLE IN THE VOID:

THE NEW ENERGY REVOLUTION

©1999

By Dr. Brian O'Leary and Stephen Kaplan



"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by power obtainable
at any point in the universe. . .it is a mere question of time when men will
succeed
in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." - Nikola
Tesla



Imagine a world with abundant, compact, inexpensive, clean energy. Global
warming has been reversed. The air is clean. Power and gas stations have
been put to other uses, and the unsightly grid system has been dismantled
and recycled. An unusual type of energy makes all this possible. It does not
come from the sun, wind, rain or tides, nor is it a fossil or nuclear fuel
taken from the ground or chemically synthesized. In some cases the source
appears to be everywhere in space-time, invisible and infinite. In others,
nuclear transmutations seem to be miraculously taking place at room
temperature accompanying the release of energy.

Incredible as this scenario appears, we shall see in this article that
laboratories around the world are repeatedly tapping into this abundant
energy. Some leading theoretical physicists are beginning to understand why
and how this is possible. Several companies are in the beginning stages of
bringing workable devices to market that clearly produce more energy than
what is needed to run them (so-called overunity devices)..

Research Breakthroughs and Commercial Developments

According to knowledgeable observers, we should focus our attention on six
new technologies: (1) plasma-type devices; (2) solid-state electromagnetic
devices; (3) ) hydrogen gas cells; (4) super motors based on super magnets;
(5) cold fusion or "new hydrogen energy" (the Japanese name for cold
fusion); (6) hydrosonic or cavitation devices.

Plasma-type devices - A variety of plasma-type devices have been patented
and are being developed with private funding for applications ranging from
computer chips to power plants. One of the most promising of these devices
is called the XS NRG PAGD (Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge) reactor. Created

by inventors Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa at Labofex in Canada, the system
is well on its way to commercialization for electric power generation in
vehicles and in homes, solidly protected by U.S and foreign patents (U.S.
Patent 5,449,989).
The reactor's self-oscillating electrical plasma discharge produces
electrical energy directly, with no intermediate thermal conversion step.
The electricity produced by the Correas' device is effectively free. The
Correas write conservatively: " . . .The cost of kWh (kilowatt hours)
produced by this technology is estimated to be more than ten times cheaper
than what is presently available from any other energy source."

Ken Shoulders' "charge cluster" device is another promising plasma
technology. Shoulders worked for a number of years as a researcher for MIT,
Stanford Research Institute and private corporations. In the 1960s he helped
to develop much of today's microcircuit technology. His high-density charge
cluster device produces more than thirty times greater output than input
energy.

Produced by a short pulse of electric potential, a typical one-micron charge
cluster is a tightly packed group of about 100 billion electrons which have
broken free from their nuclei and have come together into remarkably stable
ring-shaped units that look like tiny donuts. At first glance, they seem to
violate a principle of physics that asserts that electrical charges, either
positive or negative, repel each other. Shoulders' 1991 patent for "energy
conversion using high charge density" was the first successful patent to
claim significantly more output than input in a device that could be a
practical source of decentralized electrical energy (U.S. Patent 5,018,180).
Because charge cluster technology works without the need for magnetic fields
or low temperatures, it could well be one of the first new energy devices to
be commercialized.

Shoulders' basic process may also be valuable for the remediation of nuclear
waste. By bombarding radioactive nuclei with charge clusters, the induced
nuclear reactions (primarily fissioning of the heavier elements) result in a
reduction of harmful radiation. Laboratory experiments show a dramatic
transmutation of radioactive thorium into smaller-mass elements with the
marked reduction of the naturally radioactive thorium. With proper
engineering complete eradication may become possible.

(2) Solid-state devices - A pioneering solid-state technology is Wingate
Lambertson's World into Neutrinos (WIN) process. Dr. Lambertson has
conducted materials research and development for such organizations as U.S.
Steel, the Universities of Toledo and Rutgers, Argonne National Laboratory,
the Carborundum Company and Spindletop. He has been doing independent
dresearch over the past two decades on a a solid state device which he
believes can provide a practical source of power through the harnessing of
zero-point energy.

Lamberton's "electron dam" (E-dam) is made out of Cermet, a highly advanced
heat-resistant ceramic and metal composite. An accelerated electrical charge
sends a stream of electrons into the E-dam, and the electrons become stored
much like a conventional dam stores water. When the electrons are released,
they gain energy from the zero-point energy present in the E-dam. After they
flow into the unit to be powered, they move into another E-dam for
recycling.

Lambertson changed his cermet chemistry and E-dam design when he learned
that an unexpected chemical reaction was taking place. A different
combination of materials and composite design appears to stabilize the
process, and a yield of 145 percent was achieved in tests conducted in 1998.
Since that time an induction effect has become a major problem which
severely inhibits charge acceleration and yield. The present direction of
his research is towards reducing induction in his E-dam using two different
complementary approaches. It appears that these approaches will solve his
remaining major problem. His highest yield using these approaches in June
1999 was 109 percent. Lambertson is confident that he will achieve higher
yields with further experimentation, probably as high as 200 per cent, the
level needed for commercial viability. He is currently exploring future
production with interested manufacturers. Lambertson has a strong interest
in providing new solutions for the energy needs of developing nations.

Highly regarded Canadian inventor John Hutchinson has developed a solid
state "crystal energy converter" made out of very common materials which is
an electrical power source he claims behaves like a battery and never runs
down. This small, self-running power source, which typically puts out DC
power amounting to one or two volts, has produced up to six watts of power,
and he believes it could be engineered to replace batteries and other power
needs.

Hydrogen gas cell - Dr. Randell Mills of BlackLight Power, Inc. has come up
with a simple device he believes turns hydrogen into a clean and limitless
source of power. In his lab, Mills puts in a small amount of hydrogen gas
into a vacuum-sealed, three-quart stainless steel "can", adds a few
tablespoons of a common chemical compound, turns up the heat to about 250
degrees centigrade and seemingly creates ten to twenty times more energy
than he put into the process.

According to Mills, the secret to BlackLight Power comes from shrinking or
collapsing the size of the hydrogen atom from its natural "ground" state to
a lower energy state. As the hydrogen nucleus collapses, the electron gives
off heat energy, and the smaller the nucleus gets, the more heat the
electron gives off. Once started, the reaction can sustain itself, as the
hydrogen atoms collapse smaller and smaller, releasing increasing amounts of
energy with each collapsing "transition". Of course, we do not yet know
whether Mills' theory or some other will eventually be accepted by science
as the explanation for this process. The important point is that the
experimental results show that it works.

An impressive feature of the BlackLight Power gas cell is its simplicity. If
successful, the process is also attractive because it is safe, lacks harmful
byproducts or emissions, and does not require the use of exotic or scarce
materials. The only "waste" products are collapsed hydrogen atoms, or what
Mills calls "hydrinos", which have characteristics similar to helium, being
inert and lighter than air.

Because hydrogen is the most abundant element both on Earth and throughout
the universe, the abundance of energy available through this process is
difficult even to imagine. For example, a cup of water contains enough
hydrogen to produce over 3,000 kilowatt-hours of heat if you "collapse" the
hydrogen atoms to one-twentieth of their normal size, or enough to provide
all the energy needed for an average home - space and water heating plus
electricity - for a month.

PacifiCorp, an Oregon-based utility holding firm, has demonstrated its
belief in Mills' work by investing more than one million dollars in the
company, and other corporations appear likely to follow their lead. With
this kind of support, Mills is confident his company will soon complete a
BlackLight Power cell that will produce a full kilowatt of heat. Once this
is accomplished, it can quickly to bring to market a commercially viable
energy cell.

(3)Magnetic Motors - Based on physicist Michael Faraday's observation in the
1830s that anomalous electricity can come off a rotating disk containing
magnets, a number of inventors have created motors that they believe have
produced over-unity power in public demonstrations. One of us (O'Leary)
watched several such demonstrations, as reported in the book Miracle in the
Void. According to their inventors, some of these new devices produce four
to six times as much mechanical energy as input electrical energy. In other
words, once a machine achieves a certain threshold of revolutions per
minute, it supposedly can be unplugged and serve as a free-running generator
of electricity.

A number of magnetic motors have been evaluated by Magnetic Power, Inc.,
including devices created by the following inventors: Takahashi, Johnson,
Tobias, Adams, Yassir, Werjefelt, Kawai, Sweet, Muller and Newman. They have
also tested a device called the Magnetic Wankel from the Japanese firm, Kure
Teko. None of these devices have yet proven to function over- unity under
load.

According to Magnetic Power, there are two eminent scientists whose work on
magnetic devices may some day bear fruit: Dr. Paramahamsa Tewari, Chief
Project Engineer for India's Kaiga nuclear power plant construction program,
who is developing what he claims is a "space energy" motor/generator with
support from the Indian government; and Dr. Harold Aspden in Great Britain,
former patent counsel for IBM Europe, who is working on his version of a
practical over-unity magnetic motor.

Many of the devices developed by inventors have proven to be merely magnetic
flywheels and are therefore in fact only a type of mechanical energy storage
device. As our still incomplete understanding of magnetism continues to
grow, it is possible that one day a design based on a new source of energy
will prove practical. Roots, a subsidiary of Magnetic Power, is developing
room temperature UltraconductorsÔ . Made of highly conductive polymer
materials, this technology may make possible the creation of very powerful,
lightweight motors and generators without the use of iron or copper.

(5) Cold fusion - On March 23, 1989 Drs. Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons
at the University of Utah startled the world with their claim that they were
getting excess thermal energy far beyond electrical input energy from an
electrochemical cell with a palladium cathode and a heavy water electrolyte.
The cell output, they said, was substantially more than could be explained
by any chemical reactions.

Considerable controversy has surrounded cold fusion ever since the first
experiments. In 1989, a Department of Energy research panel, dominated by
hot fusion advocates, proclaimed that no government funding should be
invested in such a questionable area of research. Since then, following the
lead of the scientific establishment, the media has generally either
criticized or ignored cold fusion researchers.

However, the evidence for the validity of cold fusion is growing stronger
and stronger daily. The peer-reviewed published literature provides
overwhelming support for both the nuclear-scale excess heat and nuclear
changes in what were supposed to be exclusively chemically active systems.
There have been reports of transmutations of heavy elements in various cold
fusion experiments - both in ordinary water and in heavy water systems -
potassium changed to calcium, rubidium to strontium, and palladium to
silver, rhodium, ruthenium, etc.

The Pons-Fleischmann process has been declaired valid by Dr. Georges
Lonchampt, one of the top members of the French Atomic Energy Agency.
Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the U.S. Navy's China Lake
research lab have conducted successful cold fusion experiments. Finally, the
U.S. Army has reviewed the pioneering cold fusion research of Dr. John Dash,
a mettalurgist from Portland State University in Oregon, and decided to fund
his work for three years.

Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, despite overwhelming criticism heaped
on them by US scientists and scoffing by American media, continued their
work in France and England. With funding from a Toyota Foundation, they
claim to have have made excellent strides in the development of the
heavy-water, palladium cathode, electrochemical cells. Currently, months of
continuous testing of cells operating at boiling temperature has produced
data showing thermal output of twice the input electrical power - all from a
tiny palladium cathode

Clean Energy Technologies (CETI) is marketing licenses for the a power cell
invented by Dr. James Patterson, a scientist with a distinguished record of
achievement. News of his device spread widely when it was discussed on two
ABC shows, Nightline and Good Morning America.

The Power Cell has produced kilowatt levels of thermal energy at more than
twenty times the input electrical energy. It has been independently tested
and replicated by several universities, utilities and corporate research
laboratories. Motorola has tested a number of cells and found that with at
least one cell they were able to turn the input electrolysis power off, walk
away, and have the output power of twenty watts (thermal) continue for at
least a half a day. On June 11, 1997, CETI announced on Good Morning America
that a prototype hot water heater is scheduled to be mass-produced within
two to four years.

Perhaps the most astonishing finding from cold fusion research is the
apparent observation of radioactivity reduction in the process! CETI, one of
the first cold fusion companies, recently announced it had been awarded a US
patent on an electrolytic process for reducing the radioactivity of thorium
and uranium. The company claims its process can reduce the radioactivity of
radioactive materials by over 90 per cent in periods less than 24 hours -
compressing into hours what nature takes billions of years to do. A
demonstration of this seemingly successful process was included in the same
Good Morning America story which described Patterson's prototype water
heater.

Dr. Norm Olson, a Department of Energy researcher based at its Hanford
nuclear facility, was interviewed by ABC and indicated an interest in
exploring Patterson's process. He later tested the CETI power cell and found
that it did indeed reduce the radioactivity of uranium and thorium. He
cautions, however, that much more basic research needs to be done before
this or any other process can be developed into a workable technology for
dealing with nuclear waste.

There are at least three other groups who also claim to be able to reduce
radioactivity by other methods, which have yet to be awarded patents. One of
them, the Cincinnati Group, is marketing to scientists a kit which
demonstrates their transmutation process. If purchasers follow their
suggested protocal and do not get the claimed results, their money will be
refunded.

Very much worth watching is a recent cold fusion invention announced at the
most recent International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF-7), held in
Vancouver, B.C. in April 1998. It is the "catalytic fusion" process of
MIT-trained chemical engineer Dr. Les Case. Based on more than six years of
painstaking research, Dr. Case's discovery appears to be a nearly optimal
embodiment of the orginal Fleischmann-Pons process. A pre-treated activated
carbon catalyst with 0.5% to 1.0% palladium or other catalytic metal content
apparently can catalyze the fusion reaction of heavy hydrogen (deuterium)
gas to helium at elevated temperature (150 to 250 ° C). In tests conducted
by Dr. Eugene Mallove of Infinite Energy magazine, it was confirmed that the
Case process achieved a persisting excess temperature that climbed to 13.2 °
C above the baseline temperature of 178.1, which represents approximately
7.5 watts excess power.

It exhibits the heat-after-death phenomenon that many researchers have
reported coming from cold fusion cells: heat production with no input power
after the reaction is triggered.

If replication holds up, it may be impossible for anyone to deny Dr. Case's
process, especially once he has made a device that can self-sustain - that
is, employ no electrical heater power. Mallove believes the process looks
well-positioned to be a simple commerical power-generating technology in
small, distributed units, as well as in large power plants.

(6) Hydrosonic or cavitation devices - James Griggs' Hydrosonic Pump is
already being sold to customers, regularly providing them with over-unity
energy. An energy efficiency consultant from Georgia, Griggs invented the
pump as a result of his curiosity about a common phenomenon called water
hammer or cavitation. Griggs noticed that heat emanated from fluids, which
flow quickly through the pipes of a boiler causing water pressure to drop in
part of the pipe. Bubbles formed in the low-pressure areas collapse when
carried to areas of higher pressure. The resulting shock waves collide
inside the pipe bringing about the water hammer effect.

Griggs' pump is made up of a cylindrical rotor that fits closely within a
steel case. When the rotor spins, water is forced through the shallow space
between the rotor and the case. The resulting acceleration and turbulence
created in the gap somehow heats the water and creates steam. In 1988, a
testing expert found that the heat energy put out by the hydrosonic pump was
10 to 30% higher than energy used to turn the rotor.

In 1990, Griggs started Hydrodynamics, Inc. He and his partner have invested
over a million dollars in the business. The units they are selling are not
only more efficient than standard boilers but they also require less
maintenance. They are self-cleaning and eliminate the problem of mineral
build-up that reduces the efficiency of standard boilers. Georgia Power and
the civil engineering department at Georgia Institute of Technology are
currently conducting studies of the pump.

A new cavitation device similar to the Griggs machine is now available for
testing, scientific investigation and purchase by research laboratories.
This is the

"Kinetic Furnace" of Kinetic Heating Systems, Inc. of Cumming, Georgia.
Jointly invented by Eugene Perkins and Ralph E. Pope, the furnace is a
heat-producing rotary cavitation device for which the inventors have been
granted four United States patents, the most recent one in 1994. Numerous
independent companies and testing agenices have found the same over-unity
performance: Coefficient of Performance or C.O.P.(the ratio of output to
input power) in the range 1.2 to as high as 7.0, with most typical operation
in the range 1.5 to 2.0. Dr. Mallove and Jed Rothwell of Infinite Energy
recently confirmed the excess heat in a preliminary on-site test.

The reeactions responsible for the excess energy in the Perkins-Pope device
may be novel nuclear reactions or the tapping of energy reservoirs that some
have referred to as new hydrogen energy states or zero point energy. There
is no possibility, according to Dr. Mallove, that the device can be
explained by chemical energy or "storage energy".

The Kinetic Furnace represents a technology that will have application in
water and air heating, and perhaps in self-standing electric power
production and rotary mechanical power production. One of the largest
commercial hot water heater manufacturers in the world, State Industries of
Tennessee, has been calling regularly to check on the inventors' progress.
That company, and no doubt others, are taking a keen interest in the
near-term prospect of equipping their commercial water heating systems with
devices that could save the consumer 30% or more of their electric utility
bills.

First Gate Energies (formerly known as E-Quest Sciences) has created devices
that use ultrasound induced cavitation. to produce large amounts (hundreds
of watts) of anomalous excess energy. Experimental devices also produce
helium and in some experiments significant amounts of tritium. The process
does not produce any observable penetrating radiation or nuclear waste.

There is no consensus regarding how this process works. According to one
hypothesis, a myriad of collapsing bubbles form during multi-bubble
cavitation produced by intense ultrasound, and the individual bubbles act
like micro-accelerators injecting deuterons and other ions into nearby solid
lattices. Under the influence of the lattice and with other stimulation,
nuclear reactions involving deuterons and other nuclei are initatied and
controlled.

First Gate has successfully demonstrated their devices and methods at Los
Alamos National Laboratory and at SRI International. It is currently seeking
strategic alliances with companies which can help them develop commercial
products such as hot water heaters and space heaters.



The Physics of Zero-Point Energy

As impressive as the experimental evidence may be, most scientists do not
seem to understand how these "free energy" devices could work, since they
seem to violate the laws of thermodynamics. Only when the new processes are
understood properly will it be seen that they behave lawfully. We see a
growing consensus among some physicists and systems engineers concerning the
changes in theoretical models that will be required to account for the
growing number of experiments pointing to this phenomenon.

Some physicists have hypothesized that an all-pervasive electromagnetic
energy field must be present for electrons and other particles to be
continually vibrating as they radiate away energy. They assert that this
"vacuum energy" is a fundamental property of nature, a conclusion based on
experiments and observations in quantum mechanics.

Physicists Harold Puthoff, Bernhard Haisch and Alfonso Rueda have recently
published papers on this in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Physical
Review A and in the highly regarded periodicals The Sciences and Mercury. In
these articles they suggest that if an electromagnetic charge is accelerated
in the zero point field, there may exist conditions which allow for either
the extraction of energy from the field, or dissolution of energy into the
field. This accelerative force might then break the monotony of homogeneity
and isotropy that has held us back from perceiving the vast benefits that
lay within the vacuum of space. In fact, the rotary motions of fluids and
magnets, as well as the resonant vibrations inside solid state devices,
appear to provide the needed accelerative forces to tap the zero-point
field.

One of us (O'Leary) has also looked at the possibility that the zero point
field concept might be related to the mysterious interactions found in
quantum mechanics and psychic phenomena. In combination, these anomalies of
materialistic science might lead us to look toward creation of a new science
of consciousness.

The Environmental Imperative

During the 1970s, many of us were first exposed to some of growing global
energy and environmental problems. The OPEC Cartel, gas station lines, smog,
oil spills, oil wars, nuclear accidents, nuclear proliferation and waste
disposal were in the headlines and began to become known by the public U.S.
citizens and to stimulate needed policy changes.

The global situation is even more critical now than it was in the '70s.
Global warming from greenhouse gases coming mainly from the burning of
fossil fuels may be the most ominous sign of possibly irreversible damage. A
growing consensus among mainstream climatologists is that the unprecedented
persistence of El Nino conditions and resulting local weather extremes can
be directly traced to overuse of oil and coal for electricity, heating and
transportation. Incremental reforms such as emission controls, energy
conservation and turning to renewable sources, while helpful, are clearly
insufficient to stop, much less reverse, current trends.

Widespread loss of life and deteriorating health throughout the world is
caused by both the pollution and the weather shifts. Moreover, these
conditions have led to an acceleration of airborne diseases that have
already killed hundreds in the affected areas. Public health experts are
warning that this may only be the beginning of widespread plagues. Some
scientists have warned that global warming is also accelerating ozone
depletion, an even more serious threat to life on Earth.

Trends in energy use make the picture look more menacing. During the two
decades, which have passed since the time the energy crisis first erupted,
we have tripled oil consumption and doubled electricity use worldwide.
Fortune magazine has noted that if the per capita energy consumption of
China and India rises to that of South Korea (which we believe is a
realistic scenario), and the Chinese and Indian populations increase at
currently projected rates, "these two countries alone will need a total of
119 million barrels of oil a day.almost double the world's entire demand
today." Other experts, including Hal Fox, have estimated that the burning of
fossil fuels by all nations at projected levels not far in the future would
simply make our planet uninhabitable.

The Transition to a Free Energy Economy

Free energy technology holds immense promise for alleviating or eliminating
entirely the threat posed by fossil fuel and nuclear pollution. It will also
allow all areas of the world, including both developed and developing
economies, to meet increasing needs for energy without bringing about
environmental disaster.

The rate of invention and communication in the new energy field is
accelerating rapidly. Thousands of experiments are being conducted around
the world, some by inventors working alone and others by collaborative
efforts. Granted, we are largely in the research phase of the research and
development cycle, with no guarantees that any particular commercial system
will become available within a certain time frame. Granted, too, there have
been and will be many false starts and exaggerated claims. However, given
the significant initiatives in cold fusion and other new energy technologies
in the U.S., Japan and elsewhere, there is little doubt that workable free
energy devices will be available soon.

Japan may be first country to achieve a breakthrough to commercially
available technology. With minimal domestic energy supply, Japan has little
to lose and much to gain from developing new energy sources. There are more
institutional barriers to, and less incentive for, the development of free
energy in the United States. Yet work here is widespread, and projects are
beginning to attract funding from a wide variety of investors, including
utilities.

The revolution in personal computing is helping to speed up the free energy
revolution. A number of dynamic free energy discussion groups can be found
on the Internet, characterized by spirited discussion of emerging issues and
down-to-earth exchange of research data and suggestions. Because of the
distinctive openness of Internet communication, cooperation among
participating inventors and scientists almost certainly guarantees that
potentially workable theories and processes will be widely replicated and
tested. Furthermore, no central authority will be able to squelch progress,
as it might have been able to do in the past when individual inventors
almost always worked in isolation.

We are in the midst of a scientific revolution of unprecedented magnitude.
The necessity to overhaul our currently bankrupt energy systems to save the
environment is an idea whose time has come. As we bring into existence new
forms of power, we will bring about social and economic change unparalleled
in human history. The situation we are in demands fresh perspectives and
inspired leadership. Can we successfully master the challenges this
transformation presents? We believe we must and can do so, but only if we
start now the kind of democratic discussion and action this momentous shift
requires.


A Bibliography and Guide to Resources


What follows is a listing of the sources of information on the free energy
revolution. Included are major books and articles, persons and organizations
which are authorities in the field, and selected web sites.

In preparing this resource, we have gained valuable knowledge and insight
from a few knowledgeable people who keep close watch over developments in
the new energy field, including Dr. Hal Fox, editor of

New Energy News and the Journal of New Energy, Thomas Valone of the
Integrity Research Institute, Dr. Eugene Mallove of Infinite Energy
magazine, Bruce Miland of Electrifying Times, and Jeane Manning, author of
The Coming Energy Revolution.


SELECTED REFERENCES


Books
Bearden, Thomas, The New Tesla Electromagnetics and the Secrets of
Electrical Free Energy, Tesla Book Company, Chula Vista CA, 1990

Cheney, Margaret, Tesla: Man Out of Time, Dell Publishing, New York, 198l

Childress, David Hatcher, The Free Energy Device Handbook, Adventures
Unlimited Press, Kempton IL, 1994

Davidson, John, The Secret of the Creative Vacuum, C.W. Daniel Co. Ltd.,
Essex, England, 1989

Davidson, John, Subtle Energy, C.W. Daniel Co. Ltd., Essex, England, 1987

Eisen, Jonathan, editor, Suppressed Inventions and Other Discoveries,
Auckland Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, 1994

Fox, Hal, Space Energy Impact in the 21st Century. Fusion Information
Center, Salt Lake City, UT

Fox, Hal, Cold Fusion Impact in the Enhanced Energy Age, Fusion Information
Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 1992 - Bibliography on computer disk available
in English, Russian and Spanish

Kelly, Don, The Manual of Free Energy Devices and Systems, Cadake Industries
Inc., Clayton, GA, 1987

King, Moray B., Tapping the Zero-Point Energy, Paraclete Publishing, P.O.
Box 859, Provo, UT 84603, 1989

Lindemann, Peter A. A History of Free Energy Discoveries. Bayside, CA:
Borderland Sciences Research Foundation, 1986

Mallove, Eugene F., Fire From Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold
Fusion Furor, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991

Manning, Jeane, The Coming Energy Revolution, Avery Books, New York, 1995 -

The best general journalistic piece on free energy developments

Mizuno, Dr. Tadahiko, Nuclear Transmutation: The Reality of Cold Fusion.
Cold Fusion Technology, Inc., P.O. Box 2816, Concord, NH 03302-2816 - An
account of one scientist's experience on the frontiers of new energy
research.

Moray, T. Henry and John Moray, The Sea of Energy, Cosray Research
Institute, P.O. Box 651045, Salt Lake City UT 84165-1045, 1978

O'Leary, Brian, Miracle in the Void, Kamapuaa Press, 1993 South Kihei Road,
Suite 21-100, Kihei HI 96753, 1996

Seifert, Mark, Wizard: The Life of Nikola Tela

Talbot, Michael, The Holographic Universe, HarperCollins, New York, 1991

Tewari, Paramahamsa, Beyond Matter, Printwell Publications, Lekh Raj Nagar,
Aligarh-202001, India, 1984

Valone, Thomas, Electrogravitics Systems, Integrity Research Institute,
Washington DC, 1994

Articles

Cole, Daniel C., and Harold Puthoff. "Extracting Energy and Heat from the
Vacuum". Physical Review E Vol. 48, No. 2 (August 1993): 1562-1565

Haisch, Bernhard, Alfonso Rueda and Harold E. Puthoff, "Beyond E=MC ,"

The Sciences (November/December 1994) and Physical Review A (February 1994)

Hathaway, George. "The Hutchison Effect." Electric Spacecraft Journal Vol. 1
No. 4 (1991): 6-12

Kestenbaum, David. "Cold Fusion: Science or Religion?" R&D Magazine, Vol. 39
No.4 (April 1997): 51-56Lambertson, Wingate. "History and Status of the WIN
Process." In Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Energy, in
Denver, May 12-14, 1994. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research
Institute, 1994, 283-288

Lindemann, Peter A. "Thermodynamics and Free Energy." Borderlands Vol. L No.
3 (Fall 1994): 6-10

Mallove, Eugene F. "Cold Fusion: The 'Miracle" is No Mistake." Analog,
July/August 1997: 53-73

Puthoff, Harold. "Quantum Fluctuations of Empty Space: A New Rosetta Stone
of Physics?" Frontier Perspectives Vol. 2 No. 2 (Fall/Winter 1991): 19-23

Tesla, Nikola. "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy." The Century
Illustrated

Monthly Magazine, June 1909, 210

Videotapes

Free Energy: The Race to Zero Point - A comprehensive 110-minute
broadcast-quality documentary featuring the most promising devices,
processes and theories from brilliant visionary scientists and the most
persistent independent inventors on the planet. Hosted by Bill Jenkins,
written and directed by Christopher Toussaint and produced by Harry
Deligter. Distributed by Lightworks Audio & Video.

Can be ordered from Fusion Information Center, P.O. Box 58639, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84158

Cold Fusion and New Energy Briefing: Recent Breakthroughs, History, Science
and Technology - a two and a half hour video taped lecture and seminar by

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove, editor of Infinite Energy.

Order from Cold Fusion Technology, Inc., P.O. Box 2816, Concord, N.H.
03302-2816.

Cold Fusion: Fire from Water - a fast-paced documentary about what has
happened to the Cold Fusion discovery in the years since the Utah
announcement. The most recent and comprehensive overview of the work being
carried out in laboratories and companies.

Order from Cold Fusion Technology, Inc., P.O. Box 2816, Concord, NH
03302-2816.



INFORMATION SOURCES

A list of information sources (listed alphabetically) that are expressing
interest in cold fusion or other enhanced energy devices

Periodicals and Journals

Electrifying Times Newsletter.

Published by Bruce Meland, 63600 Deschutes Road, Bend, OR 97701. Phone
503-388-1908; Fax 503-382- 0384 EMai1 02331.2166@...

Infinite Energy Magazine - a comprehensive publication that covers R&D in
cold fusion and new energy technology, the "Scientific American" of the
field. Published six times a year by Cold Fusion Technology, Inc., P.O. Box
2816, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-2816. Tel. 603-228-4516;

Fax: 603-224-5975. Email: editor@.... Web site:
www.infinite-energy.com

New Energy News (NEN) INE Newsletter
The monthly newsletter of the Institute for New Energy. Salt Lake City, UT.
TEL 801-583-6232, FAX 801-583-2963. Email to ine@.... Web Site at
www.padrak.com/ine/

Planetary Association for Clean Energy (PACE) Newsletter

Quarterly newsletter, edited by Dr. Andrew Michrowski, 100 Bronson

Avenue, No. 1001, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6G6, Canada, TEL 613-236-6265, FAX
613-235-5876.. Now available: Clean Energy Review, a technical and
scientific discussion prepared for the Canadian Environmental Assessment
Agency's panel reviewing nuclear fuel wastes disposal. Discusses
transmutation as one possible solution. $5.00 U.S. and Canadian, $7.50 other
countries.

Space Energy Journal
Quarterly newsletter/magazine edited by Jim Kettner and Don Kelly, P.O. Box
1136, Clearwater, FL 34617-1136.

WEB SITES
Aether Science: Home Page of Harold Aspden

Ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/H_ASPDEN

Bearden, Thomas - Authored Files

www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/Bearden/

Bearden, Thomas - Virtual Times - Authored Files

www.hsv.com/writers/bearden/tommenu.htm

Bedini, John - Collection of Free Energy Machines

rand.nidlink.com/~john1/

BlackLight Power, Inc. Homepage

www.blacklightpower.com

Explore Publications (and Explore Magazine) www.electriciti.com/explore/

Free Energy, Anti-Gravity & Quantum Physics: Leading Edge

www.trufax.org/menu/energy.html

Hot and Cold Running Fusion

www.skypoint.com/subscribers/jlogajan

Infinite Energy Magazine

www.infinite-energy.com

Institute for New Energy (INE)
www.padrak.com/ine/ Contains many important scientific papers and current
reports on all areas of research. Email to ine@... . INE, P.O. Box
58639, Salt Lake City, UT 84158-8639. TEL 801-583-6232, FAX 801-583-2963.
Features "New Energy News", the monthly newsletter for the INE, highlighting
the research and development in the worldwide new energy arena. Edited by
Hal Fox

Homepage by Stefan Hartmann in Germany

www.overunity.de

KeelyNet BBS
Science and health oriented information exchange that specializes in
nonstandard research, much of it on new energy. Jerry Decker, 214-324-3501.
Web site at www.keelynet.com. Email to jdecker@...

Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc. (P.A.C.E.)

http://www.energie.keng.de/~pace/

Quest of Overunity, by Jean-Louis Naudin

members.aol.com/Jnaudin509/

Weird Science, Anomalous Physics and Tesla Society

www.eskimo.com/~billb/weird.html

Zero Point Energy and the New Physics

www.dnai.com/~zap/



ORGANIZATIONS

Academy for New Energy (ANE)
A subsidiary organization to the International Association for New Science,
which has specific goals directed toward the field of alternative and "New"
energy research. 1304 S. College Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80524. Tel.
970-482-3731.

Institute for New Energy (INE)
The organization to promote and help find funding for new energy research.
The INE web site at Error! Bookmark not defined. contains many important
scientific papers and current reports on all areas of research. Email to
Error! Bookmark not defined. . INE, P.O. Box 58639, Salt Lake City, UT
84158-8639. TEL 801-583-6232, FAX 801-583-2963. Features "New Energy News",
the monthly newsletter for the INE, highlighting the research and
development in the worldwide new energy arena. Edited by Hal Fox.

KeelyNet BBS
Science and health oriented information exchange that specializes in
nonstandard research, much of it on new energy. Jerry Decker, 214-324-3501.
Web site at Error! Bookmark not defined.. Email to Error! Bookmark not
defined.

PADRAK
Personal Assistance and Development through Research and Acquired Knowledge.
Technical knowledge and information transfer in the areas of advanced energy
conversion, alternative healing, and commercialization. TEL 415-949-4864,
FAX 415-949-4864 (press start), Email to Error! Bookmark not defined..


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[Home] [The Inside Story On Cold Fusion] [Miracle in the Void]
[Plasma-type devices] [Solid-state devices] [Hydrogen Gas Cell]
[Magnetic Motors] [Hydrosonic or Cavitation Devices] [Zero-Point]
[Environmental] [Transition] [Bibilography] [References]  [Books]
[Articles] [Video Tapes] [Information] [Journals] [Web Sites]
[Organizations] [Commercial Sources] [Steve Kaplan] [Brian O'Leary]
More articles by Steve Kaplan
[Walking Backwards into the Future] [An Open Letter to President Clinton]
Back to Spiritual Journeys

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

COMMERCIAL SOURCES
A list of commercial companies (listed alphabetically) that are expressing
interest in commercializing cold fusion or other enhanced energy devices.

American Pure Fusion Engineering and Supply
Information and troubleshooting for the fusion research and development
industry. Developing "Fullerene Fusion Fuel (TM)." Salem, Oregon. The
President, Warren Cooley, can be reached at 1-800-789-7109 or 503-585-6746.
Email to: Error! Bookmark not defined..

BlackLight Power, Inc.
Information on BlackLight Power process developed by Dr. Randell Mills.
Complete information can be found at website Error! Bookmark not defined..

CAI, Inc.
CAI has acquired the rights to develop and produce a new-type of thermal
power based on the controlled production of clean nuclear reactions from
micro-minature tokamaks. Contact through FIC, Voice 801-583-6232, Fax
801-583-2963.

CETI - Clean Energy Technologies, Inc.
Developers of the "Patterson Power Cell" (TM), Dallas, Texas.
Voice: 214-982-8340, FAX 214-982-8349.

Clustron Sciences Corporation
Clustron has developed a new model of the atomic nucleus, the Nucleon
Cluster Model. This model leads to a new understanding of nuclear phenomena,
including transmutation and cold fusion. Clustron has patents pending on
several potential commercial applications based on the model. For more
information see Error! Bookmark not defined. or contact Ron Brightsen at
703-671-3216

ENECO
Portfolio of intellectual property including over thirty patents issued or
pending in cold nuclear fusion and other enhanced energy devices. Salt Lake
City, Utah. Contact Fred Jaeger, Voice:801-583-2000, FAX 801-583-6245.

E-QuestSciences
Exploring "The Micro-Fusion (TM)" process. Seeking qualified research
partners for their sonoluminesence program. Contact Russ George, FAX
415-851-8489

Fusion Information Center (FIC)
Development of new energy systems. The world's most complete resource
depository for cold fusion research information, as well as other new energy
research including zero-point energy; space energy research; electronic,
electromagnetic, and mechanical over unity devices and more. We are the
publishers for "Fusion Facts", "New Energy News", and the "Journal of New
Energy". Voice 801-583-6232, Fax 801-583-2963. Contact Hal Fox.

Holotec AG
Clean Energy Technology. Contact AndreÕ Wasner, General Manager,
Bireggstrasse 14, CH-6003, Luzern, Switzerland. TEL 011 41-41 360 4485, or
FAX 011 41-41 360 4486.

Hydro Dynamics, Inc.
Hydrosonic Pump, heat-producing systems using electrical input with high
thermal efficiencies. Rome Georgia. Contact James Griggs, TEL 706-234-4111,
FAX 706-234-0702.

JET Energy Technology, Inc.
Design and manufacture of pi-electrode systems, calorimeters, and associated
equipment and systems. Consulting regarding radiation, materials, and other
scientific and engineering issues. Weston, MA. Contact Dr. Mitchell Swartz,
TEL 617-237-3625. FAX 617-237-3625.

Labofex, Experimental and Applied Plasma Physics
R&D of PAGD (Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge) plasma technology. Developments
include protable power supplies, electric vehicles and autonomous housing.
Licensing. Ontario, Canada. Contact Dr. Paulo N. Correa. TEL 905-660-1040,
FAX 905-738-8427

Magnetic Power Inc.
The Joint Venture partner with Sciex (UK) for Takahashi supermagnets and
supermotors in North America. Sebastopol, CA. Contact Mark Goldes, TEL
707-829-9391, FAX 707-829-1002.

Nova Resources Group, Inc.
Design and manufacture ETC (Electro Thermal Cell), EG (commercial power
cogeneration module), and IE (Integrated Electrolytic system). Denver, CO.
Call Chip Ransford, TEL 303-433-5582.

UV Enhanced Ultrasound
Cold Fusion Principle being used for an ultrasonic water purifier. Hong
Kong. FAX 852-2338-3057.

YUSMAR
A scientific-commercial company, to manufacture, licence, and conduct
research and developement of water-based generators: thermal (5 sizes),
electrothermal (up to 2 MW), and 'quantum' types. President: Dr. Yuri S.
Potapov, 277012 Kishinev, Moldova. Phone and Fax 011-3732-233318.

Zenergy Corporation

Founded in 1996 to facilitate the introduction of commercially viable energy
alternatives. (formerly Power Cell Technologies). Contact Reed Huish: TEL
602-814-7865, FAX 602-821-0967, E-mail info@... , and web site home
page at Error! Bookmark not defined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

BIOGRAPHIES

BRIAN O'LEARY

Brian O'Leary received his Ph.D in astronomy from the University of
California at Berkeley in 1967 and was appointed that year as a NASA
scientist-astronaut.  He has served on the faculties of Cornell, Berkeley,
Cal Tech and Princeton, has published 100 peer-reviewed papers in the
scientific literature, and is the author of ten books on science and the
environment.

Dr. O'Leary served as special advisor on energy for the U.S. House Interior
Committee's Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment.

The current article draws on a recent world tour and research for his recent
book Miracle in the Void, which investigates the potential of zero-point or
free
energy to supplant existing fossil fuel and nuclear alternatives.

Most recently, Dr. O'Leary co-founded the International Association for New
Science, The Institute for New Energy and The Academy of New Energy.

STEPHEN KAPLAN

Stephen Kaplan received his M.A. in government from Cornell University in
1965. On the national level, Mr. Kaplan has served as a legislative aide to
Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin, working in the fields of economic
opportunity, housing and energy, and as an associate of the Adlai Stevenson
Institute in Chicago.  He has also served on the board of the National Rural
Housing Coalition. He has also been a board member of the Oregon
Interreligious
Committee for Peace in the Middle East.

On the local level, Mr. Kaplan has worked as director of community
development for the Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity
(Burlington, Vermont), founder-director of the Vermont Housing Investment
Fund, and a consultant to a variety of community development corporations
and neighborhood associations.  In 1971, he was one of the founders and
first chair person of the Liberty Union, a third party in Vermont

Mr. Kaplan has taught political science, community development and
creativity courses at a number of colleges and universities.  He also
founded Creativity Associates, a firm providing training in creativity and
accelerated learning to corporations, non-profit organizations and
individuals. Currently, Mr. Kaplan is conducting research on new energy
research and
development. He is on the staff of the Catalyst Institute, a newly formed
non-profit
which is supporting the work of scientists working on the frontiers of
research concerning health and the environment.

------------------------------end article and partial forward of material
from
http://www.connexion.org/kaplan


fwd by:
________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Gaylord Nelson" <gaylord_nelson@...>; "DOE-StrategicPlan"
<StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "EarthDayNetwork Affiliates" <edn-affiliates@egroups.com>;
"EarthdayBusiness" <earthday-business@egroups.com>; "EarthDayBeginners"
<earthday-beginners@egroups.com>; "EarthDayevent Organizers"
<earthdayevent-organizers@egroups.com>; "EarthDay FaithCommunity"
<earthday-faithcommunity@egroups.com>; "EarthDay Campuses"
<earthday-campuses@egroups.com>; "EarthDay2000 Chris Curtis"
<ccurtis@...>; "John McConnell" <TrusteeOne@...>; "Stephen
Kaplan" <Kap808@...>; ""Earth Day Mom""
<earthday@...>
Subject: "When I started Earth Day in 1970..."
Date: Monday, April 24, 2000 11:29 AM

To:  Senator Gaylord Nelson,  April 24, 2000

Cc:  US Department of Energy Secretary Richardson

Dear Senator Nelson:

Many thanks to you and Department of Energy Secretary Richardson for
championing "Clean Energy Now!" on April 22nd in Washington DC.  Today is
the extended deadline for public comments to DOE on its Strategic Plan draft
so I am copying this as part of my public comments, and as an action request
for you.

I am writing you, along with others who respond in agreement with this
message, to ask you and Secretary Richardson to strongly and publicly
support "A Year for The Earth 2000-2001", ending with the initiation of
an annual "Earth Month" from the Spring Equinox (March 21, 2001)
to April 22, 2001.

This proposal was offered by the Global Peace Walk 2000 at its Earth Day
2000 event in Taos, New Mexico, to unite an effective global peace, justice,
environment, and spritual reawakening movement, on its way walking from San
Francisco to Washington DC to the United Nations for its 55th anniversary
October 24th to help inaugurate this UN Year and Decade of Creating a
Culture of Peace for the 21st Century.

The social and environmental situation in the world today is at a global
emergency level and I/we strongly urge you and the Earth Day Network to
accept this proposal to help empower the "Every Day is Earth Day" message
and the Earth Day 2000 theme of "Clean Energy Now!".  This proposal was
circulated to national media and activists email lists on April 17th as
archived at http://www.egroups.com/group/global-peace-walk/324.html , "DOE &
Earth Day Expansion Call: 'Earth Month' and 'A Year for The Earth
2000-2001'".

It is essential in today's world for the peace, social justice, and
environmental movements to unite because this global emergency condition
effects all of their related issues.  We must actually make "Global Peace
Now!" into a universal human resolve, a firm resolve by all of humanity, as
the
very first realistic step in order to have any hope of achieving our goals.
We need
global peace now so that the human and financial resources now being
squandered on war and the preparations for war can be redirected towards
solving critical environmental and social justice problems before it is too
late to avert an environmental catastrophe, increasing domestic social
upheaval, or even a Third World War.

Please also investigate the new clean Emerging Energy Technologies
information submitted in the last couple of weeks to DoE that is archived at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan because these applications of
forefront science offer little know additional superior alternatives to
nuclear and fossil fuel power, as well as the remediation of nuclear wastes.
My previous CNES comments are also referenced there and include the case for
hemp relegalization and its widespread cultivation to replace the need for
deforestation and for healing the atmosphere to ameliorate global climate
change.  The DOE Strategic Plan draft is at
http://www.doe.gov/strategic_plan

A good overview article of these newest Clean-Energy technologies,
co-authored by Stephen Kaplan (who you know) and Dr. Brian O'Leary, is at
http://www.connexion.org/kaplan .

Saturday on CSPAN I saw your speech of April 22nd in Washington DC on
the occasion of Earth Day 2000 where near the beginning you started one
sentence with "When I started Earth Day in 1970...".

I noted that you did not say "when the first Earth Day took place on April
22, 1970, in response to my call for a national environmental
teach-in/protest for the Earth, after John McConnell first began Earth Day
on the Spring Equinox of 1970 after making the announcement suggesting an
annual Earth Day at the October 1969 UNESCO Conference on the Environment in
San Francisco,..."

Perhaps you had more important things to say in your brief allotted time
Saturday, or perhaps I am in error in my understanding of the facts of the
matter in this regard as depicted at http://www.earthsite.org, so I wonder
what your comments might be about this historical point of fact whose
failure of your mention makes the "Earth Day Movement", that you initiated
according to Robert F Kennedy Jr's speech Saturday, seem less than fully in
accord with the truth.

The historical facts documented on that website represent a shadow on your
name as the Founder of Earth Day, even though there is no doubt that your
dedication and your call for a 1970 environmental teach-in on that April
22nd has been a major inspiration for what has become the successful global
Earth Day Network.

I would suggest that this misunderstanding may be cleared up best, and the
objectives of Earth Day best fulfilled, by your personally taking the lead
in championing this "A Year for The Earth 2000-2001" campaign for an annual
"Earth Month".

I noticed on the http://www.earthday.net website that the speakers in
Washington DC on Saturday were in the main activists, scientists, political
figures, and lawyers, with no religious or spiritual leaders listed that I
could recognize.

It seems that the original idea behind Mr. McConnell's original annual Earth
Day proposal was to also bring together people of all faiths, almost in the
spirit of a prayer for the Earth, to consider solutions to environmental
problems.

It seems to me that this is the one element that so far seems to have been
overlooked.

As a spiritual walk to bring out the prayer for "Global Peace Now!" as a
universal human resolve, the Global Peace Walk 2000 supports this idea and
hopes that you will incorporate it into the Earth Day theme by supporting
this "Earth Month" and "A Year for The Earth" proposal.


On behalf of All Life on Earth, with respect and thanks,

David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
Updates/Voicemail  415-267-1877

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/prop1/petition.html

USCampaign  gear2000@...
DCWilliams for President, Leonard Peltier for VP
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html

The Vision of Paradise on Earth, DCWilliams
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

Easy way to Email Media and Government
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd

From: "Jack" <sarfatti@...>
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>; "Bernhard Haisch"
Cc: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>;
"ScienceSocietyPublicPolicy" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: ZPE/ZPE, Haisch, California Institute for Physics and
Astrophysics
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 1:30 PM



> From:
> http://www.calphysics.org/research.html
>
> [note: below article copied in text format does not show the many
references
> in article formatted at this above source website with numerous html links
> therein to other articles]
>
> Bernard Haisch, astrophysicist, director of CIPA.
> Marsha Sims, executive administrator.
>
> California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics
> 366 Cambridge Ave.
> Palo Alto, CA 94306
> phone: 650-327-6284, fax: 650-327-6294
> admin@...
>
>
> Thermodynamic analysis has also shown that it is apparently possible, in
> principle, to extract energy from the quantum vacuum (i.e. no violation of
> thermodynamics appears to result from an ideal process involving the ZPF,
> although no one has yet devised a way to actually extract such energy,
> numerous claims to the contrary; for theoretical analyses see Cole, 1999,
> Amer. Inst. Physics Conf. Proc. No. 458, 960, 1999; Cole & Puthoff, Phys.
> Rev. E, 48, 1562, 1993).

[Jack Sarfatti]

To Hal and Bernie is there a brief synopsis of the key idea here of the
thermodynamic analysis? Is it simply the idea that the physical vacuum is
not
unique? One can imagine a landscape of valleys each corresponding to a
different
possible vacuum state for the interacting quantum fields of sources and
forces.
Or one can imagine essentially a simple landscape with a single basin whose
detailed shape is controlled by a set of parameters. For example, the
potential
in the Higgs mechanism from parabolic to Mexican Hat with degenerate vacua
(Goldstone theorem of gapless excitations if no long range gauge field).
Release
of vacuum energy is simply a phase transition from one valley to another
through
variation of some kind of control parameter in the sense of catastrophe
theory.

--
"But the real glory of science is that we can find a way of thinking such
that
the law is evident. ... For a successful technology, reality must take
precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
"I want to know God's thoughts ... the rest are details. ... Great Spirits
have
always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. ... Quantum
mechanics
is very impressive. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real
thing. The theory produces a great deal but hardly brings us closer to the
secrets of the old one." Einstein
"It's the end of the line, and I feel a paradigm about to shatter." Pamela
Stonebrooke's song "Heart of the Grey Matter"
http://www.well.com/user/sarfatti/

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "ScienceSocietyPublicPolicy" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: Bearden on "overunity" (COP>1) Bedini Battery
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 1:58 PM

This may be the same writeup that Col. Bearden already submitted with his
Strategic Plan public comments attachments to his two email posts to DOE of
April 9th, which I forwarded April 13th to public archive at
http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan , but since I could not open
those attachments with my software I am submitting this Bearden writeup
again to be sure it is considered.

Bearden's very technical electromagnetics discussion below, in addition to
connections to "vacuum energy", ie, the Zero Point Energy field (ZPE/ZPF) of
the quantum vacuum fluctuations, considers an unusual apparently "backwards
in time" view of time itself as bidirectional, as indicated in following
snippet.

<<In fact, because in the phase conjugate pair one wave is "time-forward"
and
the other is "time-reversed", time-reversal and time-forward perturbations
occur paired and simultaneously in nature's electrodynamics.>>


From: "Remy C." <endsecrecy@...>
To: "endsecrecy list" <endsecrecy@egroups.com>
Subject: [endsecrecy] Bearden on Bedini motor
Date: Friday, April 14, 2000 6:04 AM

(This text plus a multitude of additional commentary the John Bedini motor
can be read on the webpage below, and on the Keelynet discussion list
archives managed and monitored by Jerry Decker at www.keelynet.com. Remy C.)

From:
http://www.keelynet.com/bedmot/bedbear.htm

Tom Bearden on the John Bedini battery recharging phenomenon
04/09/00
Thanks to John Bedini and Tom Bearden for sharing this information.


For those who are directly involved, who have contributed to or are
monitoring events over the last couple of years or so, I'd like to express
my deepest appreciation it appears we are approaching some kind of plateau
in our collective understanding which is partly elucidated in this document
and links.

Basic experiments involving the Bedini motor designs, micro geometries and
vibration modes are producing useful insights that are leading to something
quite remarkable, we are beginning to see art become science.

Subject: Explanation of John Bedini's Formation of Negative Resistors in
Batteries
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:27:23 -0500
From: Tom Bearden
To: Jerry W. Decker
CC: John Bedini

Jerry,

First we must include the usual warning that the experimenter assumes all
legal responsibilities for his experiments, at his own volition. This author
assumes no responsibilities or liabilities for such actions.

John has kindly given his permission for me to explain his use of the lead
acid battery and how he gets the vacuum to contribute excess energy to the
battery and to the circuit. I'll discuss the battery a bit, very informally
because I don't have a lot of time to go back and look up all the
references, etc. and prepare a formal paper.

But we'll cover the gist of it so you can understand how John uses batteries
and switches them in his units, and why he does it the way he does. We'll
point out the processes that are involved in his methodology, and why he can
use a lead acid battery to produce COP>1.0 in perfect compliance with the
laws of physics, thermodynamics, and the conservation of energy law.

One must use a combination of electrodynamics and particle physics to grasp
these processes and mechanisms, because classical EM theory does not include
the active vacuum interaction, even though it's been clearly proven
(theoretically and experimentally) in particle physics for decades.

Vacuum energy already powers every electrical circuit and every electrical
load today, and always has done so from the beginning. Contrary to the
received view, extraction of usable EM energy from the vacuum is the easiest
thing in all the world to do, and it is ubiquitous to all our circuits and
power systems.

All the coal, oil, and natural gas ever burned in powerplants added not a
single watt to the powerline. All that energy input from the fuel combustion
was used only to continuously restore the source dipoles in the generators,
dipoles that our scientists and engineers unwittingly design the external
circuits to keep destroying.

The source dipole, once established, was and is a "negative resistor" of
enormous power that has powered every electrical circuit and load from the
beginning. As we shall see, Bedini discovered how to make a negative
resistor right inside the battery itself.

Every electrodynamicist already assumes (and utilizes) the fact that you can
freely change the potential energy of any EM system, at will. It's called
"regauging". E.g., Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, second edition (and
any other important EM book one chooses), applies arbitrary Lorentz
"regauging" to the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, changing them to a new set
erroneously said to be identical to the others in every way. They are not.

Specifically, that little change (symmetrical regauging after first Lorenz
in 1867 and later H.A. Lorentz), simply discards all open Maxwellian systems
far from thermodynamic equilibrium with the active vacuum. In short, it
arbitrarily discards all overunity EM systems, including those that could
permissibly capture and use energy from the active vacuum to power
themselves and their loads simultaneously. A priori, such Maxwellian systems
are far from thermodynamic equilibrium in the vacuum flux -- much as a
windmill is out of equilibrium with the wind's energy exchange with it.

First, to understand John's work one must be aware that there are several
currents in a lead acid battery, not just one. For our purposes we will need
just two: the heavy lead-type ion current in the battery, and the electron
current in the battery but also commuting into the external circuit.

Note particularly that the electrons communicate between the inside of the
battery (e.g., the plates) and the external circuit, but the lead ions do
not. There is thus an interface and a sharp separation between the electron
current and the ion current.

Here's the point everyone is missing. Check the mass-to-charge ratio of each
of the two currents. (I have it somewhere, from calculating it years ago,
but have no time to search for it again. So someone should look up the
numbers again and add them up; it's straightforward.).

As I recall, the lead ions' m/q ratio is several hundred thousand times the
m/q ratio of the electrons. For our purposes here, all we need to know is
that the m/q ratio for the lead ions is very much bigger than the m/q ratio
for the electrons.

So there is obviously a hysteresis (time delay) in the response of the
massive ion current to far less massive electron currents that interact and
try to change the ion current and its momentum. This time-delay in ion
response to electron urging can be adroitly manipulated and used to cause
the vacuum to add energy to the ions and also to the electrons.

In short, the delay can be manipulated to freely "regauge" the system,
freely changing its potential energy, and dramatically increasing how much
potential energy is available for battery recharging and how much is
available for powering the external circuit (loads and losses).

Instead of thinking of the energy John inputs to the battery as the
"powering" energy, one must think of it as "triggering" and "timing" energy
which initiates certain other key interactions to occur.

These additional interactions then add lots of additional energy to the ions
and the electrons, all for free or nearly so. In short, John "switches'" and
"triggers" certain kinds of vacuum interactions, including the highly
specialized formation of a negative resistor in the battery itself. He then
"triggers" that negative resistor in certain ways to increase its
functioning even further.

John's method does the following:

(1) It forms a true negative resistor in a most unexpected way, inside a
common lead acid battery,

(2) it uses that negative resistor to extract excess energy from the vacuum
and furnish it both to the ions in charging mode and to the electrons in
load powering mode, and

(3) it adds several other stimuli which increase the amplification of the
negative resistor and further enhance the effect, increasing the excess
energy extracted from the vacuum and collected in the charging process and
also in the powering process.

Specifically, the delay in ion response can be manipulated to place the
battery in ion recharging mode while the signal pulse electrons are
simultaneously placed in external circuit powering mode.

By manipulating the hysteresis and adroitly timing the electron pulses and
pulse widths, one can break the forced Lorentz symmetry of the excitation
discharge in a usually closed current loop containing both the battery's
source dipole and the external load. This is possible since John's method
deliberately opens the loop so that the vacuum energy enters freely,
increasing the potentialization (energy collection) upon the ions and the
electrons as well.

Suppose we "hit" a battery's terminals with an instantaneous leading edge
rise of a pulse of electrons and potential. Let us assume the "hit" is in
the "battery-charging" mode.

The electrons drive in instantly, trying to force the heavy ions to start
moving in the charging direction. For a moment the lead ions just sit there,
and then very slowly (compared to the electrons!) start to reluctantly move
in the recharging mode.

During that "ion response lag" time, the electrons continue to furiously
rush in and pile-up on the plates. The charge density sharply increases on
the plates in that pile-up where the charges are "squeezing" together
(clustering). So now we have a much higher potential suddenly rising in the
squeezed charge cluster, because of the increased charge density arising
there.

Refer to E.T. Whittaker, "On the Partial Differential Equations of
Mathematical Physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355.
Whittaker shows us that a "scalar" potential is not at all what they taught
us in EM theory 101. If one hasn't read Whittaker 1903, one will need to do
so.

As Whittaker shows, the scalar potential (actually its reaction cross
section is what even Whittaker is decomposing) identically is a harmonic set
of bidirectional longitudinal EM wavepairs, where each pair is a phase
conjugate pair. In short, a "scalar" potential identically is a
multivectorial, multiwave entity (but comprised of longitudinally polarized
EM waves, and those waves come in bidirectional pairs!).

In fact, because in the phase conjugate pair one wave is "time-forward" and
the other is "time-reversed", time-reversal and time-forward perturbations
occur paired and simultaneously in nature's electrodynamics. This is
erroneously omitted, however, in Maxwellian electrodynamics theory.

Anyway, the "scalar" potential isn't even a scalar entity. Since Whittaker
1903, the proof has been in the literature nearly a century and it has just
been ignored!

Since the QM vacuum contains and is a virtual particle flux (that's one way
to model it) and thus contains energy, it is (or can be modeled as) a
special kind of "scalar" potential.

Every EM potential is in fact a change to the vacuum energy density. Any EM
potential in a circuit is a change to the ambient vacuum potential or to
some intermediate potential that is. Rigorously, any increased EM potential
in a circuit is a special kind of negative resistor, since extra
bidirectional, flowing EM energy from the vacuum has been added to the
circuit.

However, electrodynamicists have not recognized that regauging produces a
true negative resistor. Very large bidirectional energy flows (very large
potentials) can be freely added to the circuit at any time. However, to use
these negative resistors so that we extract usable energy from them, we have
to learn how to more carefully use bidirectional potentials so that we apply
them adroitly in two opposing directions simultaneously.

No textbook or professor ever calculates the potential itself, but only its
reaction cross section. Consider that for awhile; it's quite rigorous. We
have been and are taught to calculate only how much energy is diverged from
the potential, around a little unit point static charge (assumed), and that
little "swirl-around" energy is then supposed to be "the potential".

It isn't. The little swirl-around is the energy diverged from the potential.
Calling that "the potential" is analogous to mistaking a tiny little
whirlpool in a river as the entire river. Same error.

For more than a century the electricians have erroneously "defined" the
scalar potential "at a point" as the amount of energy diverged from it
around a little fixed unit point static charge at that point

The amount of energy "swirled or diverted from all those bidirectional LWs
around a little unit point static charge" fixed at a point, does indeed have
a scalar magnitude. For fixed conditions, there's a fixed amount of energy
in the "swirl-around" at any moment. But that "magnitude of the energy in
the swirl" isn't the potential; it's what's diverted from the potential.

Obviously it's a major non sequitur to mistake "the" potential for a tiny
fraction of itself.

As a set of bidirectional LWs, the potential is an ensemble of mighty,
rushing rivers of EM energy, with paired rivers flowing in opposite
directions.

From those rushing rivers of energy comprising any nonzero "static"
potential, you can collect as much energy as you wish, just by adding more
intercepting/collecting charges. The equation is already known and very
simple: W = (phi)q, where W is the total energy collected (diverged) from a
potential of reaction cross section phi, upon intercepting charges q. Fix
the phi to a constant value, then add as much q as is needed to have W reach
any value you wish.

One can collect a billion watts of power from a millivolt, e.g., given
enough intercepting charges q. The "magnitude" of the potential isn't fixed
at any point, because the potential is a set of flows involving the entire
vacuum of the universe.

Anyway, back to our battery that we just "popped" with an electron pulse.
Now we have a higher potential in that pileup of electrons onto the
interface with the ions, urging the ions forward. Well, the potential energy
being collected on those ions (i.e., diverged around them from the
potential's multiwaves) is given by W = (phi) q, where W is the energy
collected from the new and dramatically increased potential with reaction
cross section (phi), upon charges q -- in this case, upon the ions. And also
upon the piled up electrons on the circuit side of the battery plate,
because the waves comprising the potential run in both directions.

Set a potential in the middle of a transmission line, and it takes off like
two scalded hogs IN BOTH DIRECTIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY,
thereby revealing its bidirectional vectorial nature.

The new, increased potential from the pile-up at the interface between
electrons and ions in the battery takes off like two scalded hogs in both
directions -- into the battery onto the ions and out into the external
circuit onto the electrons.

But that increased potential at the pileup is actually a change to the
ambient potential of the vacuum. It is part of the vacuum and a
reorganization of it, reaching across the universe in all directions (or
speeding out there in all directions at light speed).

Since the internal LW waves comprising the increased potential at the
pile-up are bidirectional, we have added energy to both the electrons out
there in the circuit and to the ions in there in the battery. Since the
electrons react (relax and move) so much faster than the ions, we can now be
drawing power in the external circuit and its load, due to the instant
response of the overpotentialized electrons, while we are still urging those
overpotentialized ions into motion in a recharging direction.

For the purist, electrons really move on the average with only a very small
drift velocity in the circuit, often on the order of a few inches per hour.
However, that average "drift" is comprised of an enormous distribution of
electron velocities, collisions, etc. So what we have actually done is
dramatically change that distribution underlying the drift velocity. The
"current" in a circuit is not as simple as the physical movement of
electrons like marbles through a hollow pipe, even though loosely one
usually uses that kind of language.

I sent you the IC-2000 paper, in which we pointed out that there is no such
thing as an isolated charge anyway, when you consider the shadowing virtual
charges of opposite sign in the vacuum that cluster around it. That is
already well-established in QM theory. So an "isolated charge" really is a
set of dipoles, where each dipole is comprised of a piece of the observed
charge and one of the clustering virtual charges. Each of those dipoles
contains a potential between its ends, and thus identically generates a
bidirectional LW flow across the universe, altering (and structuring and
organizing) the entire vacuum.

In particle physics, it has been known for more than 40 years (couple of
Nobel Prizes awarded and all that) that any dipole is a broken symmetry in
the fierce virtual energy exchange between the active vacuum and the dipole
charges.

By definition of broken symmetry, this means that some of that virtual
disordered energy continuously absorbed from the vacuum by the dipole's
charges, is NOT radiated back as disordered virtual photons.

Instead, it is self-ordered by the charges. Open systems not in equilibrium
with their active environment -- in this case the active vacuum -- are
permitted to do that, and a dipole is such an open system in disequilibrium
with the active vacuum. So the re-ordered component of the energy emitted
from the charges is radiated back as observable EM field energy flow, which
does interact macroscopically and observably with charges.

Rigorously, this "charges pile-up" at the plate interface between electrons
and ions has asymmetrically self-regauged the system including both the
recharging ions inside the battery and the electron current out in the
external circuit now forced into powering mode.

The reorganized vacuum has added excess energy to the entire system, the
excess being energy which was extracted from the vacuum by that pile-up of
charges, each with its associated clustered virtual charges, so that the
charge pile-up acts as a cluster of dipoles.

We have specified a situation and process which asymmetrically self-regauges
the system, using excess energy from the vacuum. The increased potential at
the pile-up is in fact a direct change to the entire vacuum. It is an
organization of the entire vacuum. To the system the change in the vacuum is
negentropic because the vacuum energy has been organized into a
bidirectional set of flows.

Such self-organization is permissible in an open system not in equilibrium
with its external active environment. All this is based on rigorous, proven
physics, but it is not in the hoary old classical electrodynamics, which
contains a great many foundations errors and omissions.

The set of bidirectional energy flows involving the entire vacuum and
comprising that increased potential at the pile-up, represents a
re-organization of the local vacuum to a more ordered state. In short,
negentropy. The pile-up of charges and its associated potential (negentropic
reorganization of the vacuum) constitute an active negative resistor.

This is the way that John creates a negative resistor directly inside a lead
acid storage battery (and in several other kinds of batteries also). The
pile-up becomes a true negative resistor, extracting additional biwave
flowing energy from the external vacuum.

The negative resistor receives energy from the vacuum in that half of the
unobserved internal LWs that flow from every point in external space to the
pile-up. The negative resistor then sends that organized energy out into the
"circuit" in that half of the potential's internal LWs that flow out into
the battery and in the opposite direction into the external circuit and on
out to every other point in the universe.

One should again check Whittaker 1903 and think about that extra "pile-up"
potential as a harmonic set of bidirectional EM longitudinal wavepairs,
until one understands this active negative resistance effect clearly.

The absolutely permissible, justified, scientific result is that the energy
of the system is freely and dramatically increased (the system is regauged)
from the negentropic vacuum.

The ions in that increased energy flow into the battery take on more energy
than we ourselves "input", with the excess being taken from the reorganized
vacuum by the action of the negative resistor formed at the pile-up. The
charges in the pile-up took on more energy, taken from the vacuum, and the
higher potential also flows at the speed of light back out the terminals
along the conductors, potentializing the surface charges and increasing the
intercepted energy diverged into the conductors by the surface charges.

Since a pile-up emf exists from the higher potential at the back-up and the
beginning potential in the external circuit, current flows in the external
circuit (1) in circuit-powering mode, and (2) with greater energy collected
upon the electrons from the increased Poynting energy flow diverged into the
circuit conductors.

John puts in some electrons and potential and makes a negative resistor. The
action of the negative resistor then overpotentializes both the
battery-charging ions and the circuit-powering electrons. The vacuum
furnishes the extra potential energy. So John now has lots more energy in
the circuit than he himself put in, both to recharge the battery and power
the load.

The net result is that the system eats its cake and has it too, courtesy of
having produced a negative resistor and tricked the active vacuum to
momentarily give it lots of excess energy (potential energy). It collects
some of that excess energy upon both the recharging ions and the circuit
electrons back-forced to power the circuit.

Note that the formation of the negative resistor actually produced in the
external circuit a "back emf" which is of the circuit powering type, even
though in the battery the ion current is still moving and accelerating in
the charging position -- exactly opposed to the electron current!

So the timing and negative resistor effect simultaneously introduce
additional energy extracted from the vacuum to (1) the battery charging
process, and (2) the load powering process in the external circuit.

Then we deliberately cut off the pulse sharply, with the ions now moving in
the charge direction and with the electrons in the external circuit powering
the load. The sharp cutoff rate produces a very interesting effect here
also, if we end it just precisely while most of the pile-up (and higher
potential) still exists at the plate-ion interface.

In that case, Lenz's law applies due to the sharp cutoff and it aids us,
since momentarily the negative resistor potential is even further
dramatically increased by the Lenz reaction! So even more potential energy
momentarily surges out onto the circuit electrons in the "powering the
circuit" mode, and even more potential energy simultaneously surges onto the
ions in the "charging the battery" mode.

The result of this second effect is that (1) the negative resistor is again
increased, (2) even more energy is furnished from the vacuum to the
battery-charging process, and (3) even more energy is furnished from the
vacuum to the load-powering process.

In short, the system suddenly and remarkably increases the negative resistor
effect, self-regauging itself for the second consecutive time, and
increasing the excess energy extracted from the vacuum!

This second surge of excess energy comes directly from the vacuum, from the
suddenly increased negative resistor, via those suddenly increased
bidirectional longitudinal EM wave energy flows between the pile-up and
every point in all the surrounding space. That's what a bidirectional set of
wavepairs means; observable energy flows from the pile-up (source dipole) to
every point in external space, and from every point in external space
virtual (complex) energy flows to the source dipole.

That is the second case where we cause the external circuit to be "regauged"
and change its potential energy freely, and we cause the internal ions to be
"regauged" and change their potential energy freely.

Again we accent that electrodynamicists already assume that any EM system
can freely change its energy at any time; it's called "regauging". It is
inexplicable why electrodynamicists have not focused upon actually producing
self-regauging circuits which asymmetrically discharge their freely
increased energy, as John has done, so that the dissipated energy is used to
recharge the battery while also powering the load.

Instead, the electrodynamicists continue to give us regauging circuits which
symmetrically discharge their freely increased energy, so that half the
dissipated energy is used to destroy the source dipole of the generator or
battery while the other half is dissipated in the external loads and losses.

On the other hand, John uses half the excess regauging energy from the
negative resistor to restore the battery (source) dipole, and uses the other
half to power the load and losses simultaneously. So he asymmetrically
discharges the free excitation energy received from the vacuum via the
negative resistor.

But back to John's battery process. Now we have the Lenz effect pulse
finally removed and the ions moving in charging mode but slowing down now.
Since the Lenz law effect dies rapidly, we have a rapid resumption of "draw"
of electrons from the pile-up into the external circuit to power it. But for
a bit, the ions only start to slow and have not yet stopped completely.

They "overshoot" because of their sluggishness, and keep on charging the
battery a moment longer. During this third moment, the external circuit is
still being powered even though the battery is still in charging mode.

When all these "excess energy" mechanisms are added, one finds that excess
energy can be collected from the vacuum by the negative resistor and used
appropriately to produce a system with a permissible overall COP>1.0
performance.

The dramatic difference in John's method, from the conventional method, is
that in John's method the same current through the load does not pass back
through the back emf of the source dipole negative resistor to continually
destroy it. On the contrary, he inverts the phase of the current through the
source dipole negative resistor to continually restore it.


There are several other schemes that can be used at this point. If the
follow-on pulsing etc. is matched to again initiate the effects discussed,
one can continue to draw power in the circuit while charging the battery,
etc. for about a succession of the three periods of time:

(1) the initial hysteresis pileup, formation of the negative resistor, and
associated effects,

(2) the following Lenz law reaction, increase of the negative resistor, and
associated effects, and

(3) the follow-on period of simultaneous charging the battery and powering
the circuit from the pile-up while the overshoot of the ions is still
slowing and ending.


One trick John sometimes uses is to time the next pulse front to arrive just
at the time that the ions are almost but not quite stopped in their
"overshoot" charging mode and are preparing to reverse into discharge mode
(following the electrons in the external circuit, which are already in that
mode). With the exact timing, the whole situation starts over. There are
several other variations that John has also used and found effective.

In developing this methodology, John long ago built various controllers and
timers, and experimented with a variety of pulses, pulse widths, and timing
to get it all just right for a specific battery of interest.

He had one little battery-powered motor -- an inefficient little beast with
only about 35-40% normal efficiency -- which continuously "ran off the
battery" seemingly (actually, off the excess energy from the negative
resistor created and manipulated in the battery) for a couple of years. The
motor represented a "load" continually being driven by the excess energy
extracted from the vacuum by the negative resistor continually created in
the battery.

He recharged the battery and ran the motor directly off vacuum energy, using
the precise set of negative resistor effects just discussed.

John has freely shared his work with many researchers. E.g., an excellent
microwave switching engineer named Bill Nelson visited John, observed some
of John's devices working, and reasoned correctly that the motor was just a
load and played no part in producing the excess energy.

So Nelson and another engineer used an electric light bulb as the load,
adjusted the pulses and timing appropriately, and produced a little unit
which kept its battery charged while continuously illuminating the light
bulb.

John shared his research with Jim Watson, who succeeded in developing a
version that powered a much larger motor (8 kW), which he demonstrated at
one of the Tesla conferences at Colorado Springs. Watson and his family were
later to mysteriously drop out of all contact, so that even his own
financial backer could not find him.

Ron Cole visited John's lab often, and Ron and John built several successful
and similar devices together.

There are several other powering schemes that can be worked out, using the
negative resistor created inside the battery by splitting the current
phases. E.g., with the ions moving in discharge mode and the circuit being
powered, one can again introduce a sharp voltage pulse of electrons for
charging, onto the circuit.

This of course invokes Lenz's law, dramatically increasing the powering of
the circuit and the energy upon the ions driving the circuit powering. Now
the pile-up occurs even stronger, because the ions keep bearing down in
charging mode with increased energy, while the electrons are forced to keep
boring in much more densely to oppose them, yet on the other end the
electrons are even more strongly powering the circuit momentarily because of
the increased regauging energy.

So the pile-up becomes even higher than before, increasing the potential of
the pile-up even more due to the "charge squeeze" effect being greater. In
other words, we make an even greater "negative resistor" at that pile-up.

This will greatly amplify the potential out into the circuit, and also
greatly increase the potential on the "powering" ions, so that the ions have
more energy to give to the pile-up and to the circuit, and so do the
electrons in the circuit. Again, when the "back-popping" pulse sharply cuts
off on the trailing edge, one gets a Lenz law effect of further increase,
etc..

There are a great variety of useful excess energy schemes which can be
worked out and applied, all using the excess energy freely obtained from the
vacuum by the negative resistor created and manipulated in the battery.

Once one understands John's negative resistor effect and how one gets it,
how one increases it, and how one sustains it or repeats it rapidly, then
one can adjust that motor (or other load) and that battery to function as a
self-powering system, perfectly permissible by the laws of physics and
thermodynamics.

Because of the negative resistor effect and its extraction of excess energy
from the vacuum, this open dissipative system can output more energy than
the chemical energy that is dissipated in the battery. In fact, the chemical
energy is not dissipated, but remains, when the timing and negative
resistance effects are properly adjusted. Then everything just runs off the
vacuum energy from the negative resistor.

The point is this. The system has two major currents greatly differing in
their momentum and responses, that can be exploited to get these negative
resistor effects., So why do all our theorists just continue to assume a
"simple current" in and through the battery? If one ignores the duality, one
will just mush around any transient negative resistor effect and the effect
will not help, because one will get it wrong as much as one gets it right.

But if we know what is happening in there, and if we deliberately manipulate
the phenomena as John Bedini has done for years, we can make a battery
recharge itself at the same time that it is powering the external circuit,
because of a negative resistor formed in the battery and properly
manipulated. Actually the energy extracted from the vacuum is powering both
the battery's recharging and the circuit's loads and losses.

We point out that these negative resistor effects can in fact occur in a
battery that is almost completely discharged, and John has also demonstrated
such specific negative resistor formation and operation in a nearly
uncharged battery for a sustained period of time.

For ease in building and timing the system, John often prefers to use two
batteries and switch between them. He will charge one as ostensibly an
additional part of the load, but all the while adjusting his pulses in the
charging process to dramatically open the process and get the injection of a
lot of excess vacuum energy in there via similar phenomenology to what we
described above.

Meantime, the other battery is powering the circuit normally. Then he just
switches, and recharges the first battery including evoking the negative
resistor effects in it, while using power from the second, recharged
battery.

The amount of excess charging energy he tricks the vacuum into giving him
while charging the battery, is "free" energy he can then use to power the
system when he switches the recharged battery into system-powering position.
He continues to switch, which yields a self-powering open dissipative
system, freely extracting all its energy from the active vacuum.

In that case, he makes the charging battery charge a lot faster by the
negative resistor effects than just with the simple energy he inputs in his
pulsing and in his "normal charging currents" to the battery. He "opens"
that battery-charging process and subsystem the way we described, so that
the vacuum furnishes more than half the charging input energy.

Now for the skeptics who love to quote the second law of classical
thermodynamics. Classical thermodynamics is equilibrium thermodynamics.
While the system is open and receiving excess energy from the vacuum, it is
far from equilibrium and does not have to obey the old equilibrium
thermodynamics with its infamous second law.

Indeed, classical thermodynamics does not even apply, including the second
law. Here is a magic truth: The energy of an open system not in equilibrium
is always greater than the energy of the same system in equilibrium. Bye-bye
second law of thermodynamics for non-equilibrium systems.


In John's systems, the thermodynamics of a system far from equilibrium with
its active environment (in this case, the active vacuum) rigorously applies.
As is well-known in that kind of thermodynamics, such an open disequilibrium
system is permitted to

(1) self-order,

(2) self-oscillate or self-rotate,

(3) output more energy than the operator himself inputs (the excess is just
taken from the active environment, in this case the vacuum),

(4) power itself and a load also (in that case, all the energy is taken from
the active environment, in this case the active vacuum), and

(5) exhibit negentropy.


John's devices have exhibited all five effects for years.

In other words, the laws of physics already permit this to happen. We just
have to correct the foolish old flawed notion in electrodynamics of what
powers the external circuit.

Batteries and generators do not use the energy input to them (generator
shaft energy) or available to them (chemical energy in the battery) to power
the external circuit! I fully explain that in the IC-2000 paper. The
chemical energy available in a battery and the shaft energy input to a
generator are dissipated only to restore the source dipole that our closed
current loop power systems keep destroying by design.

No laws of nature, laws of physics, or laws of thermodynamics are violated
by John's novel negative resistor approach. The conservation of energy law
is obeyed at all times, as of course is recognized for open dissipative
systems.

As an example, Ilya Prigogine was awarded a Nobel Prize for his
contributions to nonequilibrium thermodynamics of systems similar to those
we are discussing.

I just wanted to set the record straight. You can make an overunity system
anytime you wish, with adroit use of a lead-acid battery (or two of them)
where you pay meticulous attention to the production and use of a negative
resistor inside the battery itself. The science is there and it is correct.

It's already in physics, but it isn't in the seriously flawed classical
electrodynamics. The full basis has been in the textbooks for decades, but
it has not been applied by EM power system designers. Instead, they continue
to ignore the active vacuum and the creation and manipulation of negative
resistors in batteries by current splitting and adroit manipulation.

How many readers have thought of using the appreciably different response
times of the electron current and the ion current? How many professors have
thought of it? How many textbooks mention it? What EM text points out that a
scalar potential is actually a set of bidirectional longitudinal EM wave
energy flows, conditioning and organizing the entire vacuum? What paper in a
scientific journal contains it? One gets the point after only a moment's
reflection.

Now for the scientists, advanced engineers, and strategic planners. What is
needed to make all this quite rigorous is the development and usage of a
dual instrumentation system., We need to develop a proper instrumentation
system to measure and portray the ion current in the battery and its
actions, and simultaneously to measure and portray the electron current in
there at the interface. Then one can add the standard instruments to monitor
the electron current, voltage, phase angles, and power in the external
circuit.

Well, to get those two "internal" instrumentation systems, we need to enlist
some good electrochemists, who know about measuring things like that, know
about overpotentials on electrodes and plates and such, understand all the
internal chemical and ion reactions including their energetics, and have
worked out measurement techniques for such matters. To an electrical
engineer, the problem usually appears unsolvable (many, e.g., have no
knowledge of overpotential theory, or of double surfaces theory, or
differentiating multiple current types in a battery, etc.).

We just need a really good straightforward and well-funded scientific
project by a good scientific team, to develop the instrumentation and
procedures, and then to perform enough experimentation to thoroughly explore
and measure the phenomenology in all its glory.

Then the leading theorists can produce a good theoretical model, including
of the interaction between vacuum energy and the circuit, while the
developers give us a good measurement and instrumentation system for
precisely measuring such systems.

Once we get the experimentally-fitted theoretical model and we have the
instrumentation system, then we're off and running with ordinary applied
engineering, to design and build self-powering battery-powered systems
(actually as open systems adroitly extracting and using energy from the
ubiquitous vacuum) on a massive scale for the world market.

Major universities and laboratories should fund such work as a matter of
great scientific priority. So should the National Science Foundation and
National Academy of Sciences, the Department of Energy, the private research
institutes, the Environmental Foundations, etc. If they do so, then we'll
all have overunity devices powering our automobiles and homes and factories
straightaway. And we will also take a giant stride toward cleaning up the
pollution of the biosphere.

We need, however, to stress again one shocking point above all else.
Batteries and generators do not themselves power their external circuits!

Please read that again, and do not miss the importance of what we are
saying. All that the dissipation of the shaft energy input to a generator
does, or dissipation of the chemical energy available in a battery does, is
perform work upon the internal charges to separate them and form the
negative resistor source dipole. Not a single joule of that dissipated
generator shaft energy or that battery's dissipated chemical energy goes out
onto the power line.

Every electrical circuit and electrical load is now and always has been
powered by energy extracted directly from the vacuum by the source dipole
acting as a negative resistor due to its known broken symmetry in the fierce
vacuum energy flux.

To clearly understand that startling fact, we must temporarily set aside the
136-year old flawed electrodynamics (Maxwell's seminal paper was given in
1864), and turn to particle physics, because the old electrodynamicists did
not have an active vacuum in the equations, and it still isn't in there.

In the latter 1950s, particle physicists discovered and experimentally
proved broken symmetry, and also that every dipole is a broken symmetry in
the continuous virtual energy exchange between vacuum and dipole charges.
The very definition of "broken symmetry" means that something virtual has
become observable. This means that part of that fierce, virtual, disordered
energy continually absorbed by the end charges of the dipole, is not
re-radiated as virtual, disordered energy -- but as observable, ordered
energy. In short, the ubiquitous source dipole is in fact a ubiquitous
negative resistor par excellence.

The source dipole, once made, is a true negative resistor that freely
extracts observable, usable field energy from the vacuum, and pours it out
through the terminals of the generator or battery. The outflowing energy
moves at light speed through all space surrounding the conductors of the
external circuit, and generally parallel to them.

It's a tiny bit convergent into the wires, because in the "sheath" or
boundary layer of the flow right down on the surface of the conductors, that
part of the flow strikes the surface charges and gets diverged into the
wires to power up the electrons and the circuit. Every electrical circuit
and every electrical load is and always has been powered by energy extracted
directly from the vacuum by the negative resistor source dipole. That
statement is fully justified in particle physics, but not electrodynamics.
The electrodynamicists and leaders of the scientific community have refused
to change the flawed foundations and gaps in EM theory, even though a great
deal has been learned since 1867 that substantially changes the foundations
assumptions used originally to construct the theory.

The energy extracted by the source dipole from the vacuum sprays out of the
terminals of the battery or generator, filling all space around the external
conductors.

A good illustration of this incredible energy flow is shown in Kraus,
Electromagnetics, Fourth Edition. The magnitude of the energy flow extracted
is so great as to boggle the imagination. In a simple little circuit, it's
about 10exp13 times as much as is intercepted in that little "sheath flow"
by the circuit and diverged into the circuit to power it.

Well, the enormity of that energy flow extracted from the vacuum by the
source dipole is totally mystifying and embarrassing, or it was highly
embarrassing back there in the 1880s.

And therein lies one of the greatest scientific faux pas of all time.

Energy flow through space was discovered independently by Heaviside and
Poynting and at about the same time. Poynting only thought of, and accounted
for, the feeble little component of energy flow that actually entered the
circuit -- in short, the energy in that "little sheath or strip" flow right
down on the surface of the conductors.

He never even imagined all that nondiverged, nonintercepted energy component
missing the circuit entirely and just being wasted. But Poynting published
prestigiously, while Heaviside published more obscurely, and the theory of
EM energy flow was named after Poynting.

Heaviside realized the entire energy flow, including the huge nondiverged
component that entirely misses the circuit -- the component that Poynting
missed. Heaviside also corrected Poynting on the overall flow direction
(Poynting missed it by 90 degrees). Note that Maxwell was already dead at
the time.

Then the great Lorentz entered the energy flow picture, and confronted a
massive problem. How was one to account for the inexplicably enormous
nondiverged Heaviside energy flow that was pouring forth from those
terminals? And why did the circuit catch such a feeble little Poynting
fraction of the overall flow? That output is far more energy than even a
host of power systems contained or were thought to output. At the time there
was absolutely no conceivable way to account for the enormous magnitude of
the nondiverging energy flow component.

So Lorentz hit upon a stratagem. He eliminated the problem rather than
solving it. He reasoned that the nondiverged Heaviside component of the
energy flow was "physically insignificant" because it was not used in the
circuit and did not even enter it.

So he integrated the energy flow vector itself around a closed surface
surrounding any little volume of interest. Voila! That little trick
discarded that bothersome huge nondiverged Heaviside component of the energy
flow (it's physically still there around every circuit, but the circuit does
not catch it and the electrodynamicists just ignore it.). Lorentz's trick
retained the Poynting component, and since that is the energy that enters
the circuit and is collected by it, then it will be the energy that the
circuit dissipates in its losses and loads.

So it will match our instrumental measurements, since we measure
dissipation. I have a 1902 reference by Lorentz where he did that little
integration trick, but it is in a book so he very probably did it earlier in
a scientific paper which I have yet to locate.

Anyway, following Lorentz the electrodynamicists just arbitrarily threw away
far more available EM energy associated with every circuit than they
retained. All the electrodynamicists fell into line, and they are still in
the same line after a century, marching along to Lorentz's cadence.

The neglected Heaviside energy flow is still physically there as a special
negentropic organization of the vacuum surrounding every circuit, just
waiting to be used. E.g., if you retroreflect the passed Heaviside energy
flow component, you can send it back across the circuit's surface charges
again and catch some more of it.

Do it iteratively lots of times -- as in intensely scattering optically
active media -- and you will have asymmetrical self-regauging and what has
been called "lasing without population inversion". Or just resonate an
intercepting charge -- as per Letokhov and Bohren -- and it will sweep out a
greater geometrical reaction cross section and collect additional energy
from the Heaviside component (18 times as much more energy as an identical
but static particle collects).

Letokhov has been publishing in all sorts of journals on this subject since
1957. In an article in Contemporary Physics he has freely called such excess
energy collection and emission a process for a "Maxwell's demon" -- in other
words, a special kind of negative resistor.

The bottom line is that true overunity systems and negative resistors have
been built and demonstrated by several inventors and scientists such as
Bedini, Golden, Nelson, Watson, Letokhov, Bohren, Chung, Kron, Sweet, etc.
They do work, and in fact John can demonstrate one at any time.

But instead of valid scientific attention and courteous scientific
treatment, the scientists and inventors who have pioneered this legitimate
overunity area have been hounded, persecuted, vilified, etc. Careers of
legitimate scientists attempting to scientifically investigate this area
have often been ruined.


What is needed is not another group of grasping "vulture capitalists" and
stock scam artists seeking a fast fortune by selling stock and licenses to
the gullible public. What is needed is for the organized scientific
community to face its responsibility and its serious errors in
electrodynamics, and

(1) correct the terribly flawed classical electrodynamics as a matter of the
highest scientific priority, including at the foundations level,

(2) fund legitimate overunity EM power system investigators, scientists,
engineers, and serious inventors before they produce the final demonstration
model; just as they have funded hot fusion researchers for decades without
the process ever adding a single watt to the power line,

(3) set aside at least 1% of the energy research budget for high priority
vacuum-energy-powered systems and phenomenology research, and

(4) recognize that conventional leading institutions which are bastions of
the present theory have zero experience, zero expertise and usually zero
institutional tolerance for the new overunity EM systems area.


They do not even have, and do not wish to develop, any legitimate theory of
permissible EM power systems as open systems in disequilibrium with the
active vacuum, freely using vacuum energy via the creation and manipulation
of internal negative resistors.

The scientific community -- including the leading scientific journals and
scientific associations -- now must honestly face its energy and biospheric
responsibilities and reassess its adversarial position on overunity EM power
systems.

For decades the community has been a major part of the vacuum energy
problem, not part of the vacuum energy solution. It already intercepts,
controls, "cuts up," prepares and sends down the energy research budget
packages, which all those research professors, sharp grad students, and
sharp young postdocs must seek funding from, in fierce competition.

The scientific community has already pre-determined what shall and what
shall not be allowed as permissible EM power system research. And its woeful
past record as an adversary of overunity EM power systems speaks for itself.
Its years of neglecting and opposing practical electrodynamically-initiated
vacuum energy extraction have resulted in the ever-increasing pollution of
the planet and a threat to the life and survival of every species, including
the human species itself.

It is scientifically unacceptable when the scientific community still
implicitly proclaims the "source charge" as ostensibly creating all that
enormous energy in its fields and potentials reaching across the universe in
all directions.

In short, classical EM excludes the interaction of the vacuum in its power
system theory, and implies that the "source charge" freely creates all that
field energy and potential energy reaching across the universe in all
directions, and creates it right out of nothing. Yet this same community
habitually confronts the serious open dissipative system EM researcher with
the label of being a "perpetual motion machine nut".

In our very worst nightmares, we could not begin to advocate such a vast
array of perpetual motion machines as does the present scientific
establishment, which advocates every source charge in the universe as a
perpetual motion machine of the grossest kind, ignoring a resolution of the
source charge problem that has been available for almost half a century in
particle physics.

Many skilled scientists have tried to get electrodynamics changed and the
flaws corrected -- including Nobelist Feynman and the great John Wheeler, as
well as many others such as Barrett, Evans, Cornille, Lehnert, Yang, Mills,
Vigier, de Broglie, etc.

When Maxwell constructed his theory, the electron and atom and atomic
nucleus had not been discovered. The three dozen electrodynamicists
worldwide all believed in the material ether, so to them there was no place
in all the world where mass was absent. A "charge" was just a piece of
electric fluid, nothing more, nothing less.

Maxwell wrote a material fluid flow theory, and he also left out half the
energy, half the wave in space, etc. because he omitted Newtonian third law
reaction. Both mechanics and electrodynamics continue to omit one of the
most fundamental principles of all nature: that the effect acts back through
the observation process upon the cause. This principle does appear, however,
in general relativity.

But in mechanics and electrodynamics, as a result of this terrible omission,
Newton's third law remains an effect without a cause, mystically appearing
out of nowhere and producing that half of the energy and effect that Maxwell
erroneously omitted.

The purpose of this long write-up is to set the record straight on what John
Bedini has been doing in his overunity battery powered devices, including
some that have been self-powering.

A final word on entropy. Simply put, entropy refers to increasing energy
disorder, where disorder is the effect. But the back-reaction of the effect
upon the cause, omitted from mechanics and electrodynamics but present in
general relativity, has not been taken into account. That principle means
that each time there is a disordering of energy, there is simultaneously a
reordering of an equal amount of energy.

Entropy and negentropy occur as twins, simply from the occurrence of the
potential as a harmonic set of bidirectional phase conjugate pairs of
longitudinal EM waves. We usually apply one set of those waves (the forward
time set) and ignore the second set (the time-reversed set or phase
conjugate set).

In every experiment where an incoming EM wave from space affects a receiving
wire antenna, not only do the Drude electrons
<http://www.ruph.cornell.edu/sss/drude/drude.html> recoil, but also the
positive nuclei recoil with equal energy, though highly damped because of
the enormous m/q ratio of the nuclei. Eerily, hundreds of thousands of
scientists and engineers have been taught to measure the Drude electron
recoil and state they are measuring the "incoming wave" disturbance.

Not so. They are measuring the effect of half of the interaction; the other
half of the cause omitted by Maxwell interacted with the time-reversed
nuclei, and produced the Newtonian third law recoil forces. Every scientist
will acknowledge the accompanying recoil of the nuclei, then will mystically
invoke a demon who stands in the wire, observes the disturbance of the
electrons, and kicks the nuclei equally and oppositely.

A similar situation occurs in a wire transmitting antenna, where the
recoiling nuclei also perturb the surrounding spacetime with equal energy as
do the perturbed Drude electrons. Equal energy perturbation of ST means
equal ST curvature perturbation. So two ST perturbation waves are launched
simultaneously, not one.

One is a time-forward wave, and one is a time-reversed wave, paired
together. Look at it this way. The vacuum is a giant potential, which means
it can inherently be decomposed into Whittaker's bidirectional longitudinal
EM wavepair sets. Any perturbation of the vacuum must a priori disturb those
bidirectional waves, thereby producing bidirectional wavepair disturbances,
not "plucked string" waves.

There are no taut physical strings in the vacuum! Maxwell omitted the
time-reversed half of the vacuum disturbance, because the atom, nucleus, and
electron had not even been discovered at the time, and because he assumed
the taut string wave a priori. The reasoning was just that a single
electrical fluid under tensile stress was perturbed.

Anyway, I wanted to explain what John Bedini is doing in that lead acid
battery, and why his systems really do work. He has done enormous
experimentation for years. He's built many units which exhibited the
overunity effect due to creating a negative resistor in the battery, and
some which also exhibited the self-powering effect.

With a little proper scientific funding and support, a team of scientists
working with Bedini can quickly produce working overunity EM power systems,
the theoretical model, and the instrumentation system. Bedini-type systems
are easily and cheaply produced in conventional manufacturing plants.
Development and availability of such Bedini-type negative resistor systems
will start a rapid, world-wide resolution of the so-called "energy" problem.

That will also start a rapid clean-up of this suffering biosphere that is
now being poisoned and destroyed by hydrocarbon combustion waste products at
an ever-increasing rate. It will also revolutionize the living standards of
the developing nations and peoples.

In spite of the previous and present vilification of the overunity
researchers by the scientific community, I have great faith in the
scientific method, once it is permitted to function and be funded. But just
now, our own scientific community continues to impose seriously flawed
theories and approaches upon the laboratories and scientists, and actively
blocks the innovative overunity EM power systems research that could save
this planet and humanity.

We can do better than that, and we must do better than that. Else in a few
more decades none of the rest of the scientific works will matter anyway, as
the nature we are now destroying turns upon this upstart humanity and
destroys us all.

Thanks, Jerry, for bearing with this very long write-up and explanation of
Bedini's method. It is of great importance -- to the experimenters, the
inventors, the scientists, our nation, and every human being on this planet.

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden


--------------------------------------end forwarded post

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Remy Chevalier" <remyc@...>; "DOE-StrategicPlan"
<StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "ScienceSocietyPublicPolicy" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>; "Evan Soule'"
<josephnewman@...>
Subject: science fair prize winning motor (generator?)
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 1:28 PM

This sounds like Joseph Newman's energy machine http://www.josephnewman.com
and on first sight tends to support? Newman's contention that the "John
Bedini's design" employed on this "science fair prize winning motor" is
copied from Newman's work.

In any case this does seem to add more evidence to the successful testing
results of this motor/generator design if a 10 year old girl can get it to
produce the apparent overunity results.

This does not however seem to tie in with the Bedini "battery" technology
design (results recently attributed to Bedini and Bearden) as far as it
being related to the Newman Energy Machine (but could it be a different
application of his "massergies" theory?)


From: "Remy C." <endsecrecy@...>
To: "endsecrecy list" <endsecrecy@egroups.com>
Subject: [endsecrecy] Motor built by 10 year old
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:04 AM

A 10 year old girl built a science fair project that appears to be unusually
efficient.

The science fair prize winning motor was based on John Bedini's design, ran
for 5 days at 4000 rpm using only a 9VDC transistor battery. She took all
the first place ribbons plus a special award in science. It ran the whole
time the science fair was on for 5 days when they stopped it. The nine volt
battery was measured by the science teacher before the motor was turned on
and it measured 8.9 volts. These batteries are usually 400 millamps
batteries for one hour. The motor was running on 22 millamps at 4000 rpm.

To read about it go to:
http://www.keelynet.com/bedmot/bedmot.htm

There are a few diagrams and pictures, so it takes awhile to download.

Remy C.

-------------------------end forwarded post--------

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "ScienceSocietyPublicPolicy" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: Power from ZPE oscillations
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 1:00 PM

Subject: Electrical Energy From Zero Point EM Radiation
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:04 AM

Power from ZPE oscillations

From:
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8267.html

From: Jerry W. Decker
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000

Hi Folks!

Just received the latest copy of the Space Energy Journal,
Volume XI, Issue 1 for March 2000.  They are located as PO
BOX 1136, Clearwater, Florida 33757-1136.

You can contact them at spaceenergy@... and you
can subscribe for $35/year in the US.

(That's spaceenergy at earthlink.net)

In this issue, they highlight a patent by Frank Mead from
December, 1996 which is 5,590,031 and note it clearly claims
to extract electrical energy from zero point electromagnetic
radiation.

This has been posted before as I've seen it several other
times but it always is worth resurrecting, the patent is at;

http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?&pn=US05590031__


A system is disclosed for converting high frequency zero
point electromagnetic radiation energy to electrical energy.
The system includes a pair of dielectric structures which
are positioned proximal to each other and which receive
incident zero point electromagnetic radiation.

The volumetric sizes of the structures are selected so that
they resonate at a frequency of the incident radiation.

The volumetric sizes of the structures are also slightly
different so that the secondary radiation emitted therefrom
at resonance interfere with each other producing a beat
frequency radiation which is at a much lower frequency than
that of the incident radiation and which is amenable to
conversion to electrical energy.

An antenna receives the beat frequency radiation. The beat
frequency radiation from the antenna is transmitted to a
converter via a conductor or waveguide and converted to
electrical energy having a desired voltage and waveform.

ZPE appears across a broad spectrum of frequencies and one
of the interesting comments in the patent is on page 13;

"Since, as set forth hereinabove, the energy density of the
zero point radiation increases as the frequency of the
radiation increases, it is desirable that the spheres
resonate in as high a bandwidth of frequencies as possible.

Because the spheres 212 and 214 must be small in direct
proportion to the wavelength of the high frequencies of the
incident electromagnetic radiation 216 at which resonance is
desirably obtained, the spheres 212 and 214 are preferably
MICROSCOPIC in size.

Current lithographic techniques are capable of manufacturing
such microscopically small spheres mounted on a suitable
substrate thereby providing a suitably miniaturized system
210.

A miniaturized system enhances the energy output capability
of the system by enabling it to resonate at higher
frequencies at which there are correspondingly higher energy
densities.

Consequently, utilization of array 238 in the system 210
enhances the maximum amount of electrical energy provided by
the system 210."

-------------------------end forwarded post---------

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "ScienceSocietyPublicPolicy" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: ZPE/ZPE, Haisch, California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 12:50 PM

Although undated, the below article appears to be the latest
"state-of-the-art of mainstream science" views and theoretical physics
research into potential of new clean energy technologies to "harnessing the
ZPE (Zero Point Energy), or ZPF (Zero Point Field)" referenced in DOE's CNES
May 1998 followup letter attachment as the "Holy Grail of energy research".
Below article references new info since 1998.
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980512.khan.htm>
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/casimir.htm>


From:
http://www.calphysics.org/research.html

[note: below article copied in text format does not show the many references
in article formatted at this above source website with numerous html links
therein to other articles]

Bernard Haisch, astrophysicist, director of CIPA.
Marsha Sims, executive administrator.

California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics
366 Cambridge Ave.
Palo Alto, CA 94306
phone: 650-327-6284, fax: 650-327-6294
admin@...

NOTE -- The following discussion and articles are based on research carried
out so far using only the techniques of stochastic electrodynamics. As
discussed on the Mission page the goal of CIPA is to explore whether these
concepts can be reformulated, validated and generalized within the more
comprehensive discipline of modern quantum field theory.

There is growing interest in the nature of, and possibly even the
manipulation of, the quantum vacuum. The vacuum stress predicted by Casimir
in 1948 between conducting plates due to modification of the electromagnetic
zero-point fluctuations has been confirmed by experiments. Agreement with
theory at the five percent level has been obtained in a micron-range cavity
(Lamoreaux, Phy. Rev. Lett., 78,  5, 1997; see also Lamoreaux, 1999).
Thermodynamic analysis has also shown that it is apparently possible, in
principle, to extract energy from the quantum vacuum (i.e. no violation of
thermodynamics appears to result from an ideal process involving the ZPF,
although no one has yet devised a way to actually extract such energy,
numerous claims to the contrary; for theoretical analyses see Cole, 1999,
Amer. Inst. Physics Conf. Proc. No. 458, 960, 1999; Cole & Puthoff, Phys.
Rev. E, 48, 1562, 1993). A connection between the quantum vacuum and
inertial and gravitational mass has been proposed. Finally, analysis
suggests that the de Broglie wavelength of a moving particle may result from
the same ZPF-particle interaction which generates inertial mass (cf. Haisch
and Rueda, 1999).

It is well known that an accelerating observer will experience a bath of
radiation resulting from the quantum vacuum which mimics that of a heat
bath, the so-called Davies-Unruh effect. This was discovered shortly after,
and in connection with, a 1974 paper by Hawking proposing quantum
evaporation of very low mass black holes. For an accelerated object moving
through the vacuum the zero-point field will yield a non-zero Poynting
vector. Scattering of this radiation by the quarks and electrons
constituting matter would result in an acceleration-dependent reaction force
that would appear to be the origin of inertia of matter (Rueda and Haisch,
Physics Letters A, 240, 115, 1998; Foundations of Physics, 28, 1057, 1998).
In the subrelativistic case this inertia reaction force is exactly newtonian
and in the relativistic case it exactly reproduces the well known
relativistic extension of Newton's Law. Both the ordinary, F=ma, and the
relativistic form of Newton's equation of motion may be derived from
Maxwell's equations as applied to the electromagnetic zero-point field. We
expect to be able to extend this analysis in the future to more general
versions of the quantum vacuum than just the electromagnetic one. Indeed, it
is quite possible that what we have shown is how the electromagnetic ZPF
contributes to inertia, but this may not be the whole story.

The major objection raised against these concepts is that the ZPF must not
be taken literally. According to general relativity theory, the energy
density of the ZPF would generate an enormous spacetime curvature, akin to a
huge cosmological constant. This is, of course, true in the standard
interpretation of mass-energy. However one has to be careful to maintain
self-consistency when comparing theoretical models: the quantum
vacuum-inertia concept implies, via the principle of equivalence, that
gravitation must also have a connection to the ZPF (along lines conjectured
by Sakharov in 1968). If that is the case, then the ZPF cannot gravitate,
because gravitation would involve the interaction of the ZPF with
fundamental particles, not with itself. The energy density of the ZPF could
then no longer be naively equated to a source of gravitation. Such an
electromagnetically-based theory of gravitation has only undergone a
preliminary development, but it does appear that in the weak field
approximation the general relativistic curvature of spacetime can be
mimicked by a vacuum having variable dielectric properties in the presence
of matter (as conjectured by Wilson, Dicke, Puthoff and others). This raises
the tantalizing question of whether spacetime is actually physically
non-Euclidean or whether our measurements of curvature merely reflect light
propagation through a polarizable medium (the vacuum itself). This
possibility is, admittedly, unlikely given the strong evidence in
astrophysics for the existence of black holes. Since the assumed curvature
of spacetime is measured (by definition) via light propagation, there might
be no way to distinguish one from the other: curved spacetime vs. light
propagation with a dielectrically-modified speed-of-light. (We note that
Einstein himself spent many years looking for an electromagnetic basis for
gravitation, albeit unsuccessfully. Moreover modern attempts to quantize
gravity treat gravitation as just another fundamental force in flat
spacetime in which the exchange of gravitons parallels the exchange of
virtual photons as a representation of the electromagnetic force.)

Another objection involves the neutrino. If, unlike the neutron which
consists of three quarks whose charges cancel, the neutrino is truly a
neutral particle, it could have no electromagnetically originating mass. It
was announced in 1997 that the Super-Kamiokande neutrino observatory had, at
last, succeeded in measuring a mass for the neutrino. But bear in mind that
the Super-Kamiokande measurements did not directly measure the property of
inertial mass. What was measured was the ratio of electron neutrinos to muon
neutrinos due to cosmic rays. In the current Standard Model of particle
physics, this ratio implies an oscillation between the two types of
neutrinos which in turn implies a theoretical mass. To call this a measured
mass is somewhat misleading; it is a mass based on a specific interpretation
from the Standard Model not a direct measurement of inertial mass (and the
quantum vacuum-inertia concept of mass proposes specifically that mass is a
quite different thing than the concept of mass in the Standard Model).
However there is a more likely resolution. There are two other vacuum
fields: those associated with the weak and strong interactions (see
Questions). The neutrino is governed by the weak interaction, and it is
possible that a similar kind of ZPF-particle interaction creates inertial
mass for the neutrino but now involving the ZPF of the weak interaction. At
present this is pure conjecture. No theoretical work has been done on this
problem. In either case, it is prudent to be open to the possibility that
certain areas of standard theory may benefit from a fundamental
reinterpretation of mass which would resolve these apparent conflicts.

While the standard-theory arguments about the cosmological constant and the
mass of the neutrino may prove in the long run to be valid, they must be
kept in context. The quantum vacuum-inertia concept appears at this time to
be self-consistent with a real, necessarily non-gravitating ZPF and with a
neutral neutrino. Of course other objections may well arise and much work
remains to be done to test this potentially revolutionary perspective on the
origin of mass and the wave-nature of particles.


For an independent evaluation of these concepts see the Report
Zero-Point Fields, Gravitation and New Physics
by Prof. Paul Wesson
[http://www.calphysics.org/articles/wesson.pdf]

Popular Level Articles and Reports
Inertia: Does Empty Space Put Up the Resistance?
R. Matthews, Science, Vol. 263, pp. 612-613 (1994).

Unbearable Lightness: A new theory may explain why objects tend to stay put
C. S. Powell, Scientific American, Vol. 270, No. 5 (May), pp. 30-31 (1994).

Beyond E=mc2
B. Haisch, A. Rueda & H.E. Puthoff, The Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 6, November /
December, pp. 26-31 (1994).

A Quantum Broom Sweeps Clean
B. Haisch & A. Rueda, Mercury (The magazine of the Astronomical Society of
the Pacific), Vol. 25, No. 2, March/April, pp. 12-15 (1996).

Nothing Like a Vacuum
Robert Matthews, New Scientist, 25 February 1995.

Brilliant Disguise: Light, Matter and the Zero-Point Field
B. Haisch, Science and Spirit, September 1999, pp. 30-31

Inertia Theory Magic Roundabout: Paul Davies on the Meaning of Mach's
Principle
Paul Davies, The Guardian, 9/22/94

Scientific Papers
(Note: PDF Files requires Acrobat Reader to view. Download the reader here.)

The Case for Inertia as a Vacuum Effect: a Reply to Woodward and Mahood
Y. Dobyns, A. Rueda and B. Haisch, Foundations of Physics, in press (2000).
(NOTE -- This paper discusses the differences between the quantum vacuum
approach to inertia and a Machian approach.)

Toward an Interstellar Mission: Zeroing in on the Zero-Point-Field Inertia
Resonance
B. Haisch and A. Rueda, Space Technology and Applications International
Forum (STAIF-2000), Conference on Enabling Technology and Required
Developments for Interstellar Missions, Amer. Inst. Phys. Conf. Publ. 504,
p. 1047 (2000).

On the relation between a zero-point-field-induced inertial effect and the
Einstein-de Broglie formula
B. Haisch and A. Rueda, Physics Letters A, in press, (2000).

Electromagnetic Zero Point Field as Active Energy Source in the
Intergalactic Medium
A. Rueda, H. Sunahata and B. Haisch, 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE AIAA Joint
Propulsion Conference, AIAA paper 99-2145, (1999).

Progess in Establishing a Connection Between the Electromagnetic Zero-Point
Field and Inertia
B. Haisch & A. Rueda, Space Technology and Applications International
Forum-99, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 458, Mohammed
S. El-Genk, ed., p. 988 (1999).

Inertial Mass Viewed as Reaction of the Vacuum to Accelerated Motion
A. Rueda and B. Haisch, Proc. NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop,
NASA/CP-1999-208694, p. 65 (1999).

The Zero-Point Field and the NASA Challenge to Create the Space Drive (PDF
file)
B. Haisch and A. Rueda, Proc. NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop,
NASA/CP-1999-208694, p. 55 (1999).

Advances in the Proposed Electromagnetic Zero-Point Field Theory of Inertia
(PDF file)
B. Haisch, A. Rueda and H. E. Puthoff, 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE AIAA Joint
Propulsion Conference, AIAA paper 98-3143, (1998).

Contribution to inertial mass by reaction of the vacuum to accelerated
motion
A. Rueda & B. Haisch, Foundations of Physics, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 1057-1108
(1998).

Inertial mass as reaction of the vacuum to acccelerated motion
A. Rueda & B. Haisch, Phys. Letters A, vol. 240, No. 3, pp. 115-126, (1998).

An Electromagnetic Basis for Inertia and Gravitation: What are the
Implications for 21st Century Physics and Technology (PDF File)
B. Haisch & A. Rueda, CP-420, Space Technology and Applications
International Forum (M. S.El-Genk, ed), DOE Conf. 960103, American Inst. of
Physics, p. 1443 (1998).

The Zero-Point Field and Inertia
B. Haisch and A. Rueda, in "Causality and Locality in Modern Physics," G.
Hunter, S. Jeffers & J.-P. Vigier (eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., pp. 171-178,
(1998).

Electromagnetic Vacuum and Inertial Mass
A. Rueda and B. Haisch, in "Causality and Locality in Modern Physics," G.
Hunter, S. Jeffers & J.-P. Vigier (eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., pp. 179-186,
(1998).

Physics of the Zero-Point-Field: Implications for Inertia, Gravitation and
Mass (PDF File)
B. Haisch, A. Rueda & H.E. Puthoff, Speculations in Science & Technology,
Vol. 20, pp. 99-114, (1997).

Reply to Michel's "Comment on Zero-Point Fluctuations and the
Cosmological Constant" (PDF File)
B. Haisch & A. Rueda, Astrophys. J., 488, 563, (1997).

Quantum and classical statistics of the electromagnetic zero-point-field
M. Ibison & B. Haisch, Physical Review A, 54, pp. 2737-2744, (1996).

Instability in Astrophysical Plasmas and the Formation of Cosmic Voids
A. Rueda, B. Haisch & D.C. Cole, Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 445, pp. 7-16
(1995).

Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force
B. Haisch, A. Rueda & H.E. Puthoff, Physical Review A, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp.
678-694 (1994).

---------------end forwarded post-------

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DOE-StrategicPlan" <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: list of esoteric energy inventions, time for new energy source?
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 12:04 PM

Below post summarizes some anomalous 20th Century esoteric energy
technologies not yet understood or exploited, along with website reference
for more info on them and claims of contemporary understanding and
applications of related principles for new clean Emerging Energy Technology
genre to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power.

[excerpts:]

"And if you want some REALLY powerful energy?  Use "time" for energy, by
transducing time-energy into spatial energy.  Transducing one microsecond
per second of time, into spatial EM (electro-magnetic) energy, yields nearly
1,000,000,000,000 watts of power.

"Sounds wacky?  Well, a little tiny bit of that is already what is producing
the novel transmutations in the so-called "cold fusion" experiments.
Experiments, which, despite official denial by "prestigious" academic
institutions, have been replicated hundreds of times in the laboratory."


From: "Remy C." <endsecrecy@...>
To: "endsecrecy list" <endsecrecy@egroups.com>
Subject: [endsecrecy] Earth Day aftermath
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 6:55 AM

Just thought this would be food for thought on the day after Earth Day was
overshadowed by Janet Reno's perfect timing. Remy C.

----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Craddock <webmaster@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 8:41 PM
Subject: Earth Day with CSETI - Free Energy Devices and Processes


Quote from VP Al Gore today on National Public Radio, responding to
criticism of his prediction that we'll eliminate the use of internal
combustion engines within 25 years.

"We can do it in much less than 25 years!"

Perhaps he is aware of the following - if not, he should be.

*  In the 1930's, under a contract with the U.S. Navy at Stanford University
on the Network Analyzer, General Electric developed a device (actually a
"negative resistor'') that would power the circuit by extracting energy from
the vacuum when the generator was disconnected.

*  In the early 1900's, Dr. T. Henry Moray of Salt Lake City produced his
first device to tap energy from the metafrequency oscillations of empty
space itself. Eventually Moray was able to produce a free energy device
weighing sixty pounds and producing 50,000 watts of electricity for several
hours.

*  In the 1930s Russian scientists at the University of Moscow and
supporting agencies developed and tested parametric oscillator generators
that put out more power than was input ("over-unity").

*  A frequency converter using 64 transistor stages and similar
sophisticated feedforward and feedback mechanisms was placed in the original
Minuteman missile, then deliberately modified to stop its demonstrated
overunity performance. Very quietly, Westinghouse engineers then obtained
several patents surrounding the technology, but no further mention of it
appears in the literature.

*  In a 1988 experiment, an unconventional solid-state vacuum triode
developed by the late Floyd Sweet continuously discharged 1,200,000 times
more electrical power than was fed into it. It also exhibited anti-gravity
properties.

These are but a few of the documented instances where devices have been able
to extract free energy from the vacuum.

And of course it has all been quickly and ruthlessly suppressed by the High
Cabal (as Winston Churchill called them) that wants to keep us all hooked up
to the grid and to the fossil fuel bandwagon.

Even well-intentioned environmentalists have a problem with all this when
they turn to their scientific advisors, as the 136 year old electrical
theory that is taught is hopelessly (and deliberately) flawed, so that all
of the above looks "paranormal" and inexplicable.

The bottom line is that the technology to extract free energy from the
vacuum has been around for more than 50 years, and we are running out of
time to get it introduced to stop the degradation of the biosphere.

And if you want some REALLY powerful energy?  Use "time" for energy, by
transducing time-energy into spatial energy.  Transducing one microsecond
per second of time, into spatial EM (electro-magnetic) energy, yields nearly
1,000,000,000,000 watts of power.

Sounds wacky?  Well, a little tiny bit of that is already what is producing
the novel transmutations in the so-called "cold fusion" experiments.
Experiments, which, despite official denial by "prestigious" academic
institutions, have been replicated hundreds of times in the laboratory.

For a more complete summary of processes for extracting free energy from the
vacuum that have been documented in the open literature, see the CSETI
Website under What's New.

The sad thing is that mastery and quick development of self-powering EM
power systems is doable.  As research goes, it will not even be very
expensive - $40 million at most.  It can be done in five years or less,
given the focus of qualified labs and scientists, open minds, and reworking
of the flawed foundations of classical electrodynamics.

It could move with one voice under a Presidential Decision Directive.
Regards

Tony Craddock
Web Administrator
CSETI
http://www.cseti.org


----------end forwarded post

________________________
David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
General Agency Services  gear2000@...
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/genagency.html

Easy way to Email Media and Government
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd

Science & Technology in Society & Public Policy List
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams

From: "Evan Soule" <josephnewman@...>
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Re: DOE Strategic Plan
Date: Saturday, April 22, 2000 11:31 AM

I sent [following] six documents to StrategicPlan@... on April 17,
2000.

I wonder when they will be posted?

ERS

P.S. I you like, I have compiled all six documents in a two-part package,
and you ALSO may forward them on to see when they will be posted.

[below are the six documents in two parts]--dcw


From: "Evan Soule" <josephnewman@...>
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Part A: REPORT CONCERNING THE TECHNOLOGY OF JOSEPH W. NEWMAN
Date: Saturday, April 22, 2000 11:31 AM

THE FOLLOWING IS A SPECIAL REPORT CONCERNING THE TECHNOLOGY OF JOSEPH NEWMAN

"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and
making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die,
and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."  --  MAX PLANCK


What I am going to suggest to you in this Special Report is more than
simply 'a genuine improvement in electrical technology,' but rather a
significant paradigm shift which may challenge some of the fundamental
beliefs held today in electrical theory.  While I don't know you
personally, I am hoping that you, the reader, possess the gift of
intellectual honesty, i.e., a willingness to look at the facts regardless
of one's predispositions and/or prejudices.

My personal background is history and science, and I have devoted the past
twenty years to studying the history of physics -- especially with regard
to invention and the great difficulties major innovators have had in
presenting their achievements to society.  In many instances the history of
physics (science) has taught me that "the greater the innovation -- the
greater the resistance."  This is very unfortunate for the progress of
humanity.

I am hoping that the independence of your thinking will give you the
freedom to view a new technology, a new paradigm -- with the
open-mindedness and intellectual honesty of Planck's 'new generation.'

Allow me to present to you a sterling example of "intellectual dishonesty":
this brief story involves a young upstart thinker by the name of Galileo
Galilei and a most distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Padua
University by the name of Cesare Cremonini.  One may ask today, "Who is
Cesare Cremonini?"  Yet four hundred years ago, Cremonini was the
well-known and famous professor and Galileo Galilei was a virtually unknown
original thinker.

Once upon a time (so the story goes), this young thinker Galileo claimed to
have discovered "mountains on the moon" by virtue of the utilization of a
new tool called the telescope.  Naively believing that other thinkers and
professors would welcome this discovery, Galileo invited professor
Cremonini to view these moon mountains for himself through the telescope.

Cremonini chided Galileo for his insanity since, as everyone knows, "the
moon cannot contain protuberances or blemishes since Aristotle has said
that the moon is a perfect sphere."  Galileo replied, "I don't care what
Aristotle said, simply come look through my telescope and see for
yourself."  "No, Galileo, my young friend," responded Cremonini, "I KNOW
that there are no mountains on the moon."  Professor Cremonini then opened
the book of Aristotle to the appropriate page and 'proved' that Galileo
could not possibly be correct.

But Galileo was insistent.  "If you just look through the telescope you
will see that Aristotle was incorrect," he said to Cremonini.  Then
Professor Cremonini responded by saying, "No Galileo, I will NOT look
through that confounded tube of yours.  But IF I did look and if I DID see
mountains on the moon, then I would know that you have simply enchanted
me."  This, dear reader, is intellectual dishonesty.

--------------------------------------------

I am asking you, the reader, in this Special Report to be willing to "look
through the tube."  And the "tube" here represents a new understanding of
electromagnetism.

--------------------------------------------

You may ask, "How could this be so?"  One may maintain that in a
post-Faraday electrical society, everything that can be known about
electromagnetism is known.  In response to this position, I ask that you
consider the quotation of Charles H. Duell, Director of the Patent Office
in 1899:

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."

But before I present an introduction to the new technology in question,
permit me to introduce its inventor -- Joseph W. Newman.  [In my study of
the history of science, I have discovered a passion for biography, i.e., by
knowing something of the inventor one acquires a much greater depth,
richness and appreciation for the significance of the innovation.  In
addition, biographies allow the reader to learn something of the personal
struggles of the great thinkers and inventors of history.]

Who is Joseph Newman?  He is an original thinker who has educated himself
over the past forty years in physics, chemistry, astronomy and many other
areas which have intrigued him.  The focus of his life has become his work
in electromagnetics which he began developing over thirty years ago.  And
he is not a starry-eyed theoretician.  Since he has made his living by
inventing, he has discovered a need to remain grounded in reality, in
practical applications of his concepts.

--------------------------------------------

These quotations are from scientists who have endorsed Joseph Newman's work:

"The future of the human race may be dramatically uplifted by the
large-scale, commercial development of this invention."
-- Dr. Roger Hastings, Principal Physicist, UNISYS CORPORATION

"If the manner in which Joseph Newman conducted his experiments and the
results were made known to the industrial or engineering community then, in
my opinion, several companies and/or individuals possess the expertise and
capabilities to construct the hardware required to fully exploit the
apparent capability of his new concepts."
-- Dr. Robert E. Smith
Chief, Orbital and Space Environment Branch,
George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA

"You have opened an area in Astrophysics which may revolutionize the
magnetic energy problems which is now the most paramount problem in future
energy and space travel.  I do believe with proper research funds, the
results would not only be a great financial boom to your financiers, but
would lead to developments that will be practical and beneficial to all
mankind and develop a new step in science."
-- Dr. E. L. Moragne, MORAGNE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CO.
[Dr. Moragne was an electromagnetic pioneer
in the development of the first atomic bomb.]

--------------------------------------------

Better than 30 physicists, nuclear engineers, electrical engineers and
electrical technicians have signed Affidavits attesting to the validity of
his invention:  an electromagnetic motor/generator that could supply every
American's home, farm, business, automobile and appliance with electrical
power at a fraction of the present cost.

But before I discuss the invention itself, permit me to digress a moment
about magnetism.  Over the years I have posed this questions to professors
of electrical engineering:  "What is the mechanical essence of magnetism?"
The standard reply is vague at best, but includes such answers as, "It
consists of lines of force and action at a distance; potential energy."

The fifth edition of the Modern Dictionary of Electronics by Rudolf F. Graf
[published by Howard W. Sams & Co., Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana] defines
magnetism as:

"A property possessed by certain materials by which these materials can
exert mechanical force on neighboring masses of magnetic materials and can
cause voltages to be inducted in conducting bodies moving relative to the
magnetized bodies."

And, lines of force are defined as:

"In an electric or magnetic field, an imaginary line in the same direction
as the field intensity at each point.  Sometimes called a maxwell when used
as a unit of magnetic flux."

These definitions seem superficially fine, but fail to specifically address
the real question:  "What is the mechanical essence of magnetism?"  "Of
what do these 'imaginary lines of force' consist?"  "What is the real
nature of mechanical force -- what physically causes such action at the
most fundamental level?"  These questions perplexed Michael Faraday, who
said:   "How few understand the physical (emphasis added) lines of force!
They will not see them, yet all the researches on the subject tend to
confirm the views I put forth many years since.  Thompson of Glasgow seems
almost the only one who acknowledges them.  He is perhaps the nearest to
understanding what I meant.  I am content to wait convinced as I am of the
truth of my views."

[Although he had only a 7th grade, formal education, Faraday was a
mechanical genius.]

I must postulate that if Faraday were alive today he would claim that
because of the manner in which electric motors are constructed today --
utilizing high current and low voltage -- we have yet to discover the true
nature of electromagnetism.

Joseph Newman unequivocally states that all electrical motors built to date
are constructed with built-in inefficiencies since they should be operating
with low current and high voltage.  [But I am jumping ahead of myself at
this point.]

Back to Faraday . . .  One man truly understood Faraday's mechanical genius
and was capable of translating his mechanical work into mathematics:  James
Clerk Maxwell -- a towering genius and innovator in science.  Maxwell
specifically wrote the following:

"The theory I propose may . . . be called a theory of the Electromagnetic
Field because it has to do with the space in the neighborhood of the
electric or magnetic bodies, and it may be called a Dynamical Theory,
because it assumes that in that space there is MATTER-IN-MOTION, by which
the observed electromagnetic phenomena are produced."

Maxwell even went on to add:

"In speaking of the Energy of the field, however,  I wish to be understood
literally.  All energy is the same as MECHANICAL ENERGY, whether it exists
in the form of motion or in that of elasticity, or in any other form.  The
energy in electromagnetic phenomena IS mechanical energy."

Matter in motion.  Back in the early 1960's Joseph Newman wondered what was
the mechanical essence, the nature, of this "matter in motion."  In Chapter
Two of his book -- THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN -- Joseph Newman
describes the fundamental essence of a magnetic field as a particle having
a "gyroscopic spin."  This gyroscopic action is fundamental to
understanding the mechanical nature of electromagnetism.

When one understands the gyroscopic characteristics of the matter in motion
contained within an electromagnetic field, then one begins to recognize a
better mechanical means of harnessing this kinetic energy.  To generate the
largest possible magnetic field within a copper coil and therefore to have
access to greater numbers of "matter in motion" -- (for purposes of
simplicity of understanding, Joseph Newman refers to this matter in motion
as gyroscopic particles) -- one must input large amounts of voltage to
achieve maximum atom alignment in the copper coil.  When this high voltage
input occurs, the copper coil atoms release their kinetic energy in the
form of a magnetic field.

--------------------------------------------

Joseph Newman has discovered a highly efficient means to harness this
magnetic energy emanating from the copper coil.  And Joseph Newman takes
this a step farther by stating that these gyroscopic particles represent
the mechanical essence of Einstein's equation of E=mc2.  He states that
these gyroscopic particles spin at the speed of light and move in a given
direction (lines of force) at the speed of light, and are thus the
mechanical equivalent of E=mc2.

--------------------------------------------

Nearly twelve years ago, it took me about three weeks to really understand
Joseph Newman's mechanical explanation of magnetism.  I repeatedly studied
the diagrams until I grasped what he was trying to say.  As a result of
understanding his explanation of magnetism I observed a simple magnetic
phenomena which was elegantly explained by Joseph Newman's mechanical work
in magnetism (see Chapter Three of his book).

I submit the following quotation from Ken Arno, Re-search Director at
G.E.R.D., Co.:

"I can speak with a 'personal knowledge' and 'hands-on-experience' when I
talk about the collapsing magnetic field phenomena in a coil.  We here at
G.E.R.D. Co. and everyone else who makes use of electrical circuits have
always considered the collapsing field effect to be a nuisance because,
when using a mechanical relay coil in an electronic circuit, it would cause
a current to be pumped back into our circuit, creating havoc.

"One solution to the problem of C.E.M.F. was to install a diode across the
coil leads and when the power was removed, the C.E.M.F. caused a current to
flow which passed through the diode and to be dissipated as heat in the
coil itself and not in our circuit.

"The fact that this effect has for over one hundred years been viewed as a
problem to be designed out of electrical systems is the reason no one until
you, Joseph Newman, had seriously considered it as a source of abundant
free energy.  Everyone knew it was there, but no one recognized its
potential."

THE SPECIAL REPORT (Part B)

I submit the following from a Letter to the Editor of the Mobile Press
Register:

"Never having met, talked with, nor had financial dealings with Joseph
Newman, I read his book, The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman.  After 30
years in the electrical profession I felt eminently qualified to debunk his
claim to a device that generated more energy than it consumes.  In the
second chapter, I sat up in bed and shouted, 'He's got it!'"
            --- Patrick McLain, EE, Mobile, Alabama


I don't wish to dampen Mr. McLain's enthusiasm for this technology and,
although his comments are well-intentioned, Mr. McLain is laboring under
the superficial conclusion that Joseph Newman's motor "generates more
energy than it consumes."  This is simply not the case.  In fact, the motor
does generate greater external energy output than external energy input
[EEO>EEI]. This technology does not violate the Law of Conservation of
Matter and Energy.  On the contrary -- this technology further corroborates
the Laws of Thermodynamics, i.e., the only way one will achieve the
internal production of energy within the system is by supplying the system
with high voltage (and low current) to align the copper atoms in the coil.

Joseph Newman supplies an external electrical stimulus to his coil (and
special commutator system) that generates the magnetic field containing the
gyroscopic particles (matter in motion). This external electrical stimulus
takes the form of high voltage -- and the higher the better until maximum
atom alignment of the coil is achieved.  At the same time the current is
kept as low as possible to minimize resistance; thereby the Newman motor
always runs "cool."  The externally applied high voltage is not "consumed"
by the system -- it operates in the same manner as the hydraulic system in
an automobile.  The reservoir of brake fluid is not "used up" but supplies
a continual hydraulic pressure to the automobile's brake system.  In a
similar fashion the high input voltage (and low current) acts as an
electrical 'hydraulic' pressure to continually realign the atoms within the
motor's copper coil.  The continual collapse and expansion of the copper
coil's magnetic field creates the mechanical torque of the motor.  (The
special commutator system achieves this continual collapse and expansion of
the magnetic field.)

The net increase of external electrical energy from the system directly
comes from the energy produced internally within the copper coil.  This net
energy is greater than the small amount of current originally inputed into
the system along with the high voltage.  In the final analysis where is the
excess energy coming from?  Answer:  from the atoms of the copper coil
within the motor/generator.

Dr. Roger Hastings, a physicist who has worked extensively with Joseph
Newman over a number of years, has calculated that this system is so
conversion efficient that it may take decades (or far longer) to be able to
measure any appreciable mass loss in the coil.

--------------------------------------------

This brings me to a discussion of efficiency.  If Joseph Newman's
motor/generator system is viewed as a whole -- considering both external
energy and internal energy -- then the total energy output for the system
is EQUAL to the total external and internal energy input combined.

--------------------------------------------

Such a process is fully in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics!
When the system is viewed as a whole, it is imprecise to say that the
Newman motor/generator simply "produces more than it consumes."  However,
it is correct to say that "the external energy output is greater than the
external energy input" -- an external energy input considered independently
of the large internal energy produced by the Newman motor/generator.

In other words, the revolutionary nature of this system is the fact that
Joseph Newman has discovered a new electromagnetic principle of nature and
has innovated a technology capable of converting matter (copper coil) into
energy (in accordance with E=mc^2) via a highly efficient electromagnetic
reaction rather than an inefficient fission reaction.

Those who state that "one can never build a device which exceeds 100%
efficiency" do not understand the nature of the phenomenal efficiencies (in
excess of 800%) produced by the Newman motor/generator.

Such a statement demonstrates an inability to distinguish between
CONVERSION efficiency and PRODUCTION efficiency.  To state that Joseph
Newman's motor/generator is 8.2 production efficient, i.e., that it
produces over eight times as much external energy output as external energy
input, is different from stating that the invention approaches 100%
conversion efficiency, i.e., that it converts the internal mass of the
copper coil into energy in accordance with E=mc^2.  The former process
involves production efficiency and the latter process involves conversion
efficiency.  These two different types of efficiencies should not be
confused.

In his motor/generator system, the electromagnetic conversion (of matter to
energy) efficiency approaches 100% [rather than the less than 1% conversion
(of matter to energy) efficiency of a typical nuclear fission reaction.]
The production efficiency of the Newman energy machine has been found to be
in excess of 800%, i.e., over eight times as much external energy output as
external energy input.

Consider the following crude analogy of a nuclear fission reactor to Joseph
Newman's motor/generator:  a typical nuclear reactor consists of a small
amount of external electrical energy being inputed into the reactor station
to turn on lights, activate control panels, start machinery, etc.  The
large external energy produced by the reactor, however, is the result of
the nuclear fission process which internally occurs within the system.

As a result of such an internal fission process, external electrical energy
is produced  in the system.  If, however, one ignores the internal energy
and only considers the initial, small external energy input, then one could
say that the net external electrical energy output produced by a nuclear
reactor is greater than the external electrical energy input.

The important distinction, however, between a conventional nuclear reactor
and Joseph Newman's motor/generator is that the former is less than 1%
conversion efficient and the latter approaches 100% conversion efficiency.

--------------------------------------------

In essence, Joseph Newman has integrated the work of Faraday with that of
Einstein and has created a motor technology that will bring us into the
21st century.  One may say that "this is too good to be true."

Is this -- our current electrical technology -- the BEST that we can do?
Is there no expectation that we may achieve a deeper understanding of
electromagnetism which will allow us to build fundamentally different (and
more efficient) motors?  Could one not conceive that such a revolutionary
technology could be achieved in fifty years?  One hundred years?  One
thousand years?  Can anyone really believe that our traditional
motor/electromagnetic technology is the technology that will be utilized
five thousand years from now?

But why must we wait five thousand years?  Why not in a hundred years?  Why
not in fifty years?  Why not NOW.

You may say, "Well, why hasn't it been done before now?"  My response:  why
did the Wright Brothers 'wait' until 1903 to invent the aeroplane?  Things
happen when they do, I suppose . . . often in spite of tremendous
ignorance, apathy and hostility.

Christian Morgenstern summed it up quite well when he said:

"The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply."

In its essence, Joseph Newman's technology is the model of simplicity.

--------------------------------------------

For twelve continuous hours, Joseph Newman operated a recent production
model of his motor/generator:  from 8:00AM to 8:00PM -- and attached to a
Grainger Reciprocating Pump -- the Newman Motor/Generator pumped 1 gallon
of water per minute at 12 PSI at the Lucedale, Mississippi City Park.  The
voltage source was a local alternating current connection to the Newman
Motor/Generator through a conventional house watt meter.  The Newman
Motor/Generator utilized the city grid voltage but not the current. When a
conventional motor was operated on this city grid system the house watt
meter proceeded to turn, indicating that external electrical energy was
being consumed.

During the entire 12 hours that the Newman Motor/Generator pumped water,
the house watt meter did not move.  Moreover, for the entire 12 hour period
the Newman Motor/Generator ran cool.  The news media, city officials and
representatives of the local power station observed and corroborated these
results.

--------------------------------------------

One fallacy is the belief that the strength of the magnetic field
surrounding a copper conductor coil comes from the input CURRENT.  THIS IS
FALSE!  The strength of the magnetic field surrounding a copper conductor
coil comes from the ATOMS OF THE COPPER WIRE contained WITHIN THE TURNS OF
WIRE as aligned by the input VOLTAGE.....NOT the CURRENT.  And the greater
the input VOLTAGE (up to maximum atom alignment of the atoms in the copper
coil) the stronger the magnetic field surrounding the coil and hence, the
greater the back-emf.

Evan Soule'
Director of Information
THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN
11445 East Via Linda, No. 416
Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
(480) 657-3722
www.josephnewman.com

"I cannot conceive curved lines of force without the conditions of a
physical existence in that intermediate space."  --- MICHAEL FARADAY

"In speaking of the Energy of the field, however, I wish to be understood
LITERALLY.  All energy is the same as _mechanical energy_, whether it
exists in the form of motion or in that of elasticity, or in any other
form.  The energy in electromagnetic phenomena is _mechanical_ energy."
                            --- JAMES CLERK MAXWELL

*****************************************************

CORROBORATIVE INFO FROM THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS

IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT A RESEARCH REPORT PUBLISHED IN THE
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS (Volume 77, Issue 11, June 1, 1995, pages
6015-6020) PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, FURTHER
VALIDATES THE PIONEERING WORK OF INVENTOR JOSPEPH NEWMAN.

TITLE:
Increased Voltage Phenomenon in a Resonance Circuit of Unconventional
Magnetic Configuration

PREFACE:
The behavior of an ICR (inductance-capacitance-resistance) circuit with a
moveable ferromagnetic core is discussed.  The core is attracted by a
magnetic field generated by an electric current resulting from the
discharge of a capacitor in the closed ICR circuit.  An unusual increase in
recharge voltage, which was dependent on the magnetic configuration of the
coil, was observed.  This voltage increase does not conform to the
mathematical simulation of the system.  The possibility that a positive
electromotive force was involved in this effect is discussed.

------------------------------------------------------
The following is a particularly interesting statement from this article:
------------------------------------------------------

"Generally speaking, it is expected that the total recharge voltage will
decrease because this system produces mechanical output as the core moves.
However, through a series of experiments, it was discovered that results
depend on the magnetic configuration of the coils used in the circuit.  In
other words, for a certain kind of magnetic field, the opposite result
could occur --- an increase in the average current and recharge voltage. To
confirm the above observations, an experiment was conducted, which is
described in this article."

------------------------------------------------------
The following was one of the final conclusions presented in this article:
------------------------------------------------------

"It can be postulated that the complex movement of magnetic flux generates
a positive EMF, but the cause of the voltage increase is not clear."

------------------------------------------------------

Through his research over the past 30 years and as demonstrated in his
numerous experiments and working prototypes, Joseph Newman has presented a
comprehensive explanation for the cause of the "voltage increase" described
in the above article.  I urge the reader to locate a copy of this research
article from the Journal of Applied Physics, published by the American
Institute of Physics, and review it for yourself.

Evan Soule'
Director of Information
THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN
11445 East Via Linda, No. 416
Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
(480) 657-3722
email:
josephnewman@...

*****************************************************

end of Part A.


From: "Evan Soule" <josephnewman@...>
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Part B: REPORT CONCERNING THE TECHNOLOGY OF JOSEPH W. NEWMAN
Date: Saturday, April 22, 2000 11:31 AM

THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN

Joseph Newman's technology does not "create" energy.  What his technology
accomplishes (as verified by more than 30 scientists and engineers) is the
TRANSFORMATION of energy from one state into another, TOTALLY IN ACCORDANCE
with the First Law of Thermodynamics.  That is also accomplished in
accordance with Einstein's equation of E = mc^2 [which was originally
stated by Einstein as EL (Electricity) = mc^2.]

Ironically, when Joseph Newman originally began his research over 35 years
ago, it was precisely because he DOES so strongly believe in the First Law
of Thermodynamics that he believed that it was possible to innovate his
technology.  As a result, his successfully operational technology fully
works in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics and represents a
verification of same.

In keeping with the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, one cannot simply create
"energy" from nothing.  All generation of energy consists of energy
transfers/transformations that operate in strict accordance with the 1st
Law.

That is PRECISELY what occurs with respect to Joseph Newman's technology.

Joseph Newman's technology operates on HIGH voltage and LOW current --
directly opposite to ALL conventional motors.  Consequently, it runs COOL.
All conventional motors have been constructed over the past 160+ years with
a built-in inefficiency, based upon a 180-year-old misconception.

The "official" description of Joseph Newman's electromagnetic aspect of his
Theory of the Gyroscopic Massergy is:  "the Newman Motor/Generator produces
'greater external energy output than external energy input.'"  This is, in
principle, no different from a conventional nuclear fission reactor.
Joseph Newman's work represents a TOTAL confirmation and corroboration of
the First Law of Thermodynamics.  This technology has PROFOUND
social/political implications with respect to our country's future since it
would replace ALL conventional energy sources and enable Americans to
become TRULY energy independent.

Joseph Newman's book, which represents his Theory of the Gyroscopic
Massergy, also presents the first explicit mechanical explanation for
Fleming's Rule and Magnetic Attraction/Repulsion in scientific history, as
well as a mechanical unification of the fields.  Hopefully, someone such as
Professor A. Swimmer, PhD, [Professor of Mathematics for over 30 years] who
has endorsed Joseph Newman's fundamental work, will use Joseph Newman's
mechanical unification to formulate a _mathematical_ field unification.

In conclusion:
What the technical process involved DOES do is EXTEND the Law of
Conservation of Matter and Energy into a new domain, i.e., the equivalence
of matter/energy via E=mc^2 is extended to the electromagnetic domain.
Such extensions of natural law into new domains have certainly been typical
of the history of the progress of science.

Essentially, what Joseph Newman has innovated is the integration of the
19th Century work of Michael Faraday (upon which much of our conventional
electromagnetic theory is based) with the 20th Century work of Albert
Einstein to produce a revolutionary new electromagnetic technology for the
21st Century.

Best regards,

Evan Soule'
Joseph Newman Publishing Company
11445 East Via Linda, No. 416
Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
(480) 657-3722

************************************************

FACTS CONCERNING THE TECHNOLOGY OF JOSEPH NEWMAN

1)  Over 30 experts -- physicists, nuclear engineers, electrical
engineers/technicians -- have tested Joseph Newman's energy machine (also
known as the Newman Motor/Generator) and have signed Affidavits that it
performs as indicated.

2)  Dr. Roger Hastings (Principal Physicist with Unisys) has conducted
hundreds of hours of testing on Joseph Newman's Motor/Generator and has
signed Affidavits attesting to the operability of the Newman
Motor/Generator.  Dr. Hastings states:  "The future of the human race may
be dramatically uplifted by the large scale commercial development of this
invention."  In addition, Robert J. Matherne, a physicist from Entergy
Corp, (and who was instrumental in the development of the nuclear power
plant at Taft, Louisiana), has also attested to the significance of this
new technology.

3)  Joseph Newman has constructed many operational prototypes of his
technology over the years, ranging in size from 4 pounds to 15,000 pounds.

4)  The energy machine will totally decentralize our access to energy and
will have a profound socio-economic impact upon our civilization.  The
energy generated by this machine is harmless, non-polluting, and will
replace ALL present forms of energy generation.  With the energy machine,
every consumer could make a one-time purchase of a unit that could be
installed in one's backyard and virtually unplug themselves from local
utility companies.  The energy machine could also be utilized to power all
air, land, and sea vehicles and would elminiate the polluting effects
caused by the internal combustion engine.

5)  Joseph Newman has published a book entitled THE ENERGY MACHINE OF
JOSEPH NEWMAN in which he discloses all of his theories and the technical
processes relating to the construction of his energy machine.  It is
important to Joseph Newman that this knowledge be preserved and
disseminated.

6)  Joseph Newman has been working on his concepts for over 30 years.  He
submitted his Technical Process to the U.S. Patent Office several years
before he constructed the first operational prototype of his energy
machine.

7)  The energy machine is a physical embodiment of Joseph Newman's
Technical Process. Joseph Newman hopes that someone with the requisite
ability will use his MECHANICAL innovations to formulate a MATHEMATICAL
extrapolation.  Such an accomplishment would be similiar to the manner in
which Michael Faraday's MECHANICAL work led to mathematical theories
developed by James Clerk Maxwell.  [Although Michael Faraday was
mathematically illiterate (his own words), he was a MECHANICAL genius.]

8)  The theories of Joseph Newman also represent a precise, mechanical
explanation of the phenomena of magnetism (not otherwise currently
understood) and the principle of "action at a distance."  When one
understands the nature of the energy discovered by Joseph Newman, then one
can understand how it would be possible to build a technical application
capable of harnessing such mechanical motion (energy).  As Maxwell
explicitly stated:  "The energy in electromagnetic phenomena is MECHANICAL
ENERGY" and consists of "matter in motion."  Joseph Newman describes the
fundamental mechanical essence of a magnetic field as a massergy having a
"gyroscopic spin."  This gyroscopic action is fundamental to understanding
the mechanical nature of electromagnetism.

9)  Technically-speaking, what Joseph Newman teaches is that one's goal in
the construction of one of his operational Motor/Generators is "to have the
LEAST amount of current input to create the GREATEST amount of atomic
domain alignment within the material of the conductor, thereby causing the
GREATEST magnetic field to be created."

10)  The energy machine of Joseph Newman is far more efficient than
conventional nuclear energy and does not release any harmful radiation or
emission.  This invention can be used to power the home, industry, or to
produce electrical energy for flight at a small fraction of today's cost.
As Joseph Newman states:  "The finished prototype of what I teach will
drastically change the world for the good of humanity, more so than any
invention before this time."

11)  Joseph Newman has developed a precise and fundamental mechanical
explanation for both magnetic attraction and repulsion as well as Fleming's
Rule.  An understanding of this explanation is what originally led him over
thirty years ago to began to truly understand the mechanical essence of
(electro)magnetic fields and enabled him to create an innovative technology
capable of harnessing the energy contained within these fields.
[Additional technical email documentation is available.]

For additional information:

Joseph Newman Publishing Company
11445 East Via Linda, No. 416
Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
(480) 657-3722

THE ENERGY MACHINE OF JOSEPH NEWMAN
josephnewman@...
Website: http://www.josephnewman.com

************************************************

JOSEPH NEWMAN'S STATEMENT TO COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES

The great 19th century innovator of electromagnetism, Michael Faraday, gave
personal praise to Professor Thompson of Glasgow as being almost the only
one who understood him, when Michael Faraday wrote:

"How few understand the PHYSICAL lines of force!  They will not see them,
yet all the researches on the subject tend to confirm the views I put forth
many years since.  Thompson of Glasgow seems almost the only one who
acknowledges them.  He is perhaps the nearest to understanding what I
meant.  I am content to wait convinced as I am of the truth of my views."

Michael Faraday recognized that the lines of force of a magnetic field are
real, kinetic, physical, and mechanical in nature.  This has been ignored
in the past 150 years.

Now, ironically and appropriately, history repeats itself in this century.

The following is quoted from Professor Yun Li of E&EE of Glasgow following
information sent to him about my work:

"Thank you for sending me such an interesting article (SPECIAL REPORT).  I
have forwarded the following information to some 100 colleagues.  You may
get queries from them.  If you send further details regarding the motor,
I'd be very interested in receiving them."

The following letter was sent to approximately 100 colleagues of Professor
Li in response to the article about my work:

"What an interesting article to read!  The following mentioned two Glasgow
Alumni.  One is "Thompson of Glasgow", i.e., William Thompson (Lord Kelvin,
1824-1907, who entered Glasgow University at age of 10).  The other is
James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879).

"The article described that an electric motor provides an energy as high as
the nuclear energy.  Do you believe it?  You may not believe, probably
correctly, that Maxwell's conclusion that electricity, magnetism and light
were part of the same phenomenon is true for static (not steady-state)
magnetism.  Have magnetic mono-poles been found?  We know that permanent
magnet comes from the aligned gyroscopic self-spin of iron atoms.  Owing to
the absence of monopoles, the PM can magnetize (almost without losing its
own energy) many steel iron pieces (since the flux can always close its
loop on its own without the help of further external energy).  On contrast,
electricity cannot do static charges like this.  So I believe in this
article, for the energy the motor generates perhaps comes from the coil or
PM losing a couple of their spinning atoms.

"The underlying engineering point that this article tries to make is that
atoms of a copper wire are aligned by the input voltage and thus the
voltage, not the current, should be the driving force of a motor.   Thus
the motor needs zero current at steady-state.  I remember in Wen Soong's
PhD thesis, he also mentioned that in an optimal operation the back e.m.f.
would be as high as the input voltage at steady-state, which means zero
current and power consumption.

Happy reading,

Dr. Yun Li"
Professor, Electrical Engineering, Glasgow

A return letter was sent to Professor Li, thanking him for his sincere
efforts on behalf of this important technology.  Professor Li responded:

"You are welcome.  That was at least what I as an academic engineer should
and could do, as I believe new inventions should not be dismissed before
people understand them.

Thanks again,

Professor Yun Li, Glasgow"

FACT:  I now have constructed a prototype of my new energy Motor/Generator
such that with a load of a 42-inch fan blade, would cause the voltage
within a battery pack consisting of 6-volt dry cell batteries to increase.
This has been verified by oscilloscope readings measured properly across
the battery pack.

FACT:  All conventional teachings state that the battery voltage should
decrease with such a load being placed on a conventional motor.

In light of the courage and scholarly honesty of Professor Li of Glasgow, I
thank Professor Yun Li for his overseas support.

Joseph Westley Newman

____________________________________________

Additional Note added by E. Soule':

Conventional motors are designed with small coils and operate on HIGH
CURRENT, low voltage.  Joseph Newman's Motor/Generators have generally been
designed with the optimal purpose of "achieving the LEAST amount of current
inputed to have the GREATEST amount of atom alignment in the conductor
material (which causes the GREATEST magnetic field)."  It is Joseph
Newman's position that because of a fundamental misunderstanding of the
nature of electromagnetism, all conventional motors have been designed with
built-in inefficiencies.

End of Part B.

Please include the following comment in the public record
for the U.S. Department of Energy's Strategic Plan:

Since 1993 I have been following the development of new
sources of energy whose origins in general lie outside the mostly
uncreative mainstream science bureacracies of academia, government
and large corporations. The remainder of my comment is an
excerpt of a compilation of advanced technologies I have written
and occasionally revised the past couple of years. I believe that
the energy inventions herein described should be included in the
DOE's Strategic Plan for honest evaluation and possibly experimentally
supported and even initially subsidized to ensure vigorous
commercialization.

Gary C. Vesperman
3123 Trueno Road
Henderson, NV 89014-3142
(702)  435-7947
vman@...


Introduction

I used to be associated with a resort complex to be built on a large tract
of raw land which is located outside the United States. This project
presented a rare opportunity to incorporate on a large scale current
thinking and ideas prevailing among experts in urban planning, ecological
sustainability, wildlife habitat preservation, etc. The project also
provided an opportunity and the freedom to utilize advanced technologies
which may lie outside the generally accepted theoretical constraints of
mainstream science. The resort ended up being built by other people on an
adjacent property. The exercise still was somewhat fruitful in stimulating
some fresh ideas.

For the past few years, I have been accumulating knowledge of futuristic
technologies not commonly known among mainstream scientists. I have
personally had the pleasure to know some of the top scientists and inventors
involved with what has been referred to as a mostly unpublicized
international “underground” science research network. Disregarding the
scientific dogma taught by academia, these people have chosen to follow
their own independent paths of scientific discovery to whatever they feel
the genuine scientific truth may be.

I have selected several advanced technologies which seem to be usable for
the foreign resort project. Their selection was based on their being
available for purchase and are definitely past the research and development
stage. Implementation of most of these technologies could occur anytime
before, during or after the construction phase of the project. However, it
should be noted that the electric station car technologies ought to be
adopted as soon as possible as they happen to substantially impact
architectural design and construction. The electrical power infrastructure
could also be affected by adopting one or more small-scaled electrical
generation technologies. Retrofitting at a later date could be costly.

I also have selected a few advanced technologies which are still under
development but may have potential applications for the resort project.

Please be warned that investments and purchases in any of these advanced
technologies should proceed only after a thorough and cautious exercise in
due diligence. Yet their inventors usually do deserve respect and fairness.
In most cases, I can not personally take responsibility for the accuracy and
validity of my descriptions; I am only editing other people’s reports.

The literature on the devices which involve extracting energy from
radioactive substances, the ether, hydrogen, etc. contains anecdotes of
strangely behaving devices and explosions and, in some cases, of bodily
injury and even death!

WARNING!

Before experimenting with such devices, protect yourself from harm! Please
try to be well-informed of other experimenters’ experience with these
strange devices and beware of danger.


Davis Tidal Turbine

The worldwide electrical energy market has been estimated at $800 billion
(US) per year and rising. “There are 2 billion people who still lack
electricity today, and the world demand in developing countries is doubling
every eight years." (World Watch Institute, May 1997)

The Institute for New Energy maintains a database of 127 new energy
production devices which includes a list based on commercialization criteria
ranging from 0 (found to be lies) to 10 (proven prototype – ready for
commercialization). (I know of several such devices that don’t appear to be
included in their database.) The Davis tidal turbine, invented by Canadian
aerospace engineer Barry Davis, is one of only two new energy devices which
have earned a ranking of 10. His company, Blue Energy Canada, Inc., owns one
patent and has filed additional patent applications.

The Davis tidal turbine captures the power of ocean currents and tides to
generate electric current in a module fitted with slowly rotating
hydrofoils. The module does not emit gas of any kind, nor do the hydrofoils
offer any threat to marine organisms swimming through them. With fixed rotor
blades mounted in durable marine concrete caissons, the Davis tidal
turbine’s mechanical simplicity is profound. The basic concept is the
multiple
vertical-axis hydro turbine. They are large marine structures of reinforced
concrete and steel that provide the necessary economies of scale. They
generally can be installed in areas with a tidal regime of about 1 meter or
more, or where velocities exceed about 2 meters per second. Standardized
tidal turbine modules can be grouped to meet any site application from ocean
to river in sizes that range from 7.5 megawatts to 15 megawatts for ocean
use, and 5 kilowatts to 500 kilowatts for river use.

The Davis tidal turbine is a low-cost, eco-benign energy alternative. Fueled
by the free forces of rivers and ocean tides and currents, tidal power can
provide a significant amount of the world's energy needs. Energy costs with
the Davis tidal turbine will be around $0.06/kilowatt-hour and eventually
should drop to $0.035/kilowatt-hour for tidal fences in the 1000-megawatt
range. Power outputs from the larger units can be accurately predicted to
within 2 per cent accuracy.

In many instances, tidal fences can double up with transportation corridors,
providing dual infrastructure use with essentially single infrastructure
cost. Coupled with existing grid prices and mounting social and
environmental costs associated with conventional power generation (health
care, climate change, etc.) tidal power is an outstanding and sustainable
energy choice. Remote sites can also produce hydrogen, hydrogen peroxide,
methane and other valuable energy intensive products for widespread
distribution, as well as provide irrigation and desalination facilities.

Tidal energy sites in the world's oceans can provide a significant, viable
and cost-effective source of reliable, inexhaustible energy. Many are
strategically located close to populated areas where they can be
economically harnessed using an ecologically benign, low-head technology.
For example, British Columbia may have up to 50,000 megawatts of potential
tidal power resource.

The Philippines Presidential Office had announced on December 20, 1997 a
$136,000,000 (US) order for a pilot tidal power generation facility which is
likely to be in the Hinatuan Passage area just north of Mindanao. Its
average power output will be 30 megawatts, and its peak power will be 55
megawatts. The pilot project is performance-coupled to the future
development rights of a 1000-megawatt commercial project. The Philippines
hope to become energy exporters.


Electric Station Cars

The Las Vegas Chapter of the Electric Auto Association appears to be one of
the association’s stronger chapters. I have attended over 80 per cent of
their monthly meetings for the past several years. I myself have written an
Advanced Self-Powered Electric Vehicle concept (see end of this paper). The
“super car” concept is a proposal for combining advanced technologies I have
collected over the past few years into a futuristic self-powered electric
car superior to conventional cars.

On November 20, 1997, at their November meeting, Martin J. Bernard III,
Ph.D., Executive Director of the National Station Car Association, spoke on
“Station Car Potential in Las Vegas”. Of all the meetings I have attended,
his talk was the most practical application of electric vehicles I have
heard. Because I could see an obvious application of the station car concept
to the foreign resort project, I thought I would list a few key points for
further discussion:

Many pages of additional information and diagrams concerning electric
station cars are available on the National Station Car Association’s Web
site (www.stncar.com). The Web site includes a photograph which shows some
of the 40 electric station cars currently being used in conjunction with the
Bay Area Transit District in the San Francisco Bay Area. There are a total
of 60 other station cars in several other cities around the United States.

The resort project as presently planned probably allows for lots of parking
space for gasoline-powered cars, gas stations, auto repair facilities, etc.
Because the project is still in the planning stages, there is a high
probability that it can be easily converted to emphasis on electric station
cars. Only three simple changes would have to be made to the plans:

A substantial reduction in paved parking space in exchange for a substantial
increase in landscaping and preserved wildlife habitat. (I think Martin said
up to 90 per cent reduction.)

Reductions in gasoline refueling stations and auto repair facilities.

Installation of electric vehicle charging stations in the remaining parking
lots.

In return, the resort would gain the following benefits:

A more pleasant environment in the immediate vicinity of the resort’s
buildings, featuring silence (except noise from an occasional diesel or
gasoline-powered truck), less dust and particles from vehicle exhaust, and
zero runoff from oil dripping on pavement.

More efficient use of the small country’s electric power plants which
otherwise can not be operated as efficiently in a small market as compared
to huge markets such as the United States. When I looked up the country’s
power information on the Internet, I noticed that a new coal-fired power
plant enters operation in mid-1999. It happens to be impractical to reduce
power output in a coal plant during the middle of the night.

Lower vehicular operating costs.

Less pavement, more landscaping, and increased preservation of the resort’s
natural features and greenery.

Electric station cars are not owned by the drivers. Instead they are owned
by an operator such as a municipality or transportation authority. They are
intended for use at places featuring frequent usage and regular access such
as train stations, airports, hotels, convention halls, and downtown areas.

A driver who has previously bought a smart card (similar to a credit card)
swipes the card through a card reader which allows him access to the station
car. He or she then unplugs the car from the charger, drives off, and leaves
it either at the same charging station or a different charging station,
which is then available for the next driver to drive. Arrangements can be
made to leave it at home overnight providing it is driven again the
following morning.

The cars are manufactured in Norway by a family-owned plastic manufacturer.
The car body is a simple lightweight one-piece plastic shell framed with
extruded rods made of recycled aluminum. It is surprisingly sturdy and can
carry two passengers. The pack of nickel-cadmium batteries is hung
underneath the body and range up to 65 miles.

It is reasonable to anticipate that a variety of sizes and improved models
of electric vehicles will become available in a few short years. For
instance, on October 23, 1997, a pre-production Sunrise prototype built by
Solectria Corporation, Wilmington, Massachusetts, was driven from Boston to
New York City on a single charge of its Ovonic nickel/metal-hydride battery
with enough electricity left over to drive an additional 66 kilometers to
Atlantic City for a total range of 405 kilometers (IEEE Spectrum December
1997). Power Technology, Inc., has a brand new battery, compared to
lead-acid batteries, that is 30 per cent to 50 per cent lighter, insensitive
to temperature, long-lived, cheaper, environmentally friendly, quickly
rechargeable, and quadruples the range.

Blacklight Power, Inc., is developing a battery which weighs only 10
kilograms but can supply 150 horsepower for 1,000 miles. Blacklight
compresses hydrogen atoms into lower-energy-state hydrogen atoms called
“hydrinos”. When the hydrinos are formed, energy is released which is
considerably more than the energy from chemical reactions but less than from
nuclear reactions. (See Blacklight Power's impressive Web site
http://www.blacklightpower.com .)

Each car is equipped with a commercially available electronic tracking
device. The San Francisco Bay Area is ringed with 15 transmitting towers.
Each car can be located with an accuracy of 4 feet in case it is stolen.

At each station, a driver returning a car is responsible for cleaning the
car and plugging the car into a battery charger before leaving it.


POWR/MASTR (trademark) Industrial Engine

The commercially available POWR/MASTR (trademark) is a high-efficiency,
long-life industrial engine which is fueled by natural gas, propane or
butane. A POWR/MASTR (trademark) can be directly connected to gas company
pipelines and so never needs refueling. Each POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit can
generate over 145 horsepower for mechanical power needs, or 100 kilowatts of
electricity for electric power needs. POWR/MASTR (trademark) units can be
linked together in parallel and/or linked to utility company electricity to
satisfy energy requirements of any size.

POWR/MASTR (trademark) offers savings of up to 50 per cent over other
mechanical power costs, or up to 70 per cent over utility company charges
for electricity. A San Diego shopping center saves $125,000 per year in
electricity costs.

POWR/MASTR (trademark) is environmentally friendly, using only clean burning
gases at a maximum rate of 9 therms/900,000 Btu/900 cubic feet per hour of
natural gas. When less power is needed than 100 kilowatts or 145 horsepower,
POWR/MASTR (trademark) automatically self-adjusts to use less fuel.
Operating at less than a quiet 60 dB at 20 feet, POWR/MASTR (trademark)
sounds no louder than a new car engine at idle. It also produces far less
harmful exhaust emissions than a typical gasoline-fueled automotive engine.
POWR/MASTR (trademark) is fully automated and designed for 60 months of
continuous use with maintenance regularly scheduled every 1,500 hours.

Each POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit weighs 3,200 lb., and its size is 8 feet
long by 5 feet wide by 6 feet high. A POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit can be
transported on its own delivery trailer and installed by one person in about
four hours after site preparation. No cranes, work crews, nor special
foundations are necessary. An adjustable level platform system is built-in
so that no poured nor perfectly level pad is required. Controls are included
at no charge to allow more than one POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit to deliver
electricity with other power generation units or in conjunction with utility
company power.


Hydrosonic Pump

The hydrosonic pump seems destined to become a billion-dollar invention with
many applications. It is really a zero-pressure boiler, not a pump. The
inventor has been calling it a pump so as to avoid tangling up with strict
American Society of Mechanical Engineers boiler codes.

Mechanical input power rotates the shaft, and plain water is converted to
steam without the need for hot surfaces. The process seems to be actually a
form of fusion where collapsing microscopic bubbles momentarily create
extremely high pressures and temperatures. The technical term for this
phenomenon is “sono-luminescence”. The energy conversion efficiency is
around 130 per cent. (To prevent confusion, it should be clearly understood
that the hydrosonic pump on the macro scale does NOT operate at high
temperatures and pressures as is the case with nuclear or fossil-fueled
boilers.)

One application is to use a windmill to turn the shaft. Out of the nozzle
comes steam which drives a steam turbine to produce electricity. The steam
then enters a condenser from which can be obtained potable water and hot
water for space heating. For remote islands, for example, the hydrosonic
pump would be very useful. One utility is reportedly already looking at
increasing the efficiencies of its nuclear and fossil-fueled power plants by
3 - 5 percentage points.

Nevada has large underground reservoirs of useless mineralized water. The
hydrosonic pump could be the centerpiece of a large-scale scheme to generate
electricity, heat and potable water.

The hydrosonic pump is actually being commercially manufactured and sold.
The inventor definitely is using the correct approach in that since the pump
is such a new technology, for some time he has been simply building one unit
at a time in various sizes and configurations. He has been purposely
restricting their sale to local installations so he can closely monitor
their performance and incorporate improvements and changes into future
units.

As of May 1996, he had 14 units actually installed and operating. One
application is for producing clean steam on demand for a commercial laundry.
Based on feedback from customers’ experience with them, he is evolving
step-by-step in an organized manner towards eventual mass production of
fully validated units. It seems to be much easier to obtain expansion
capital for actual commercial units than “laboratory queens”.


Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge Reactor

A typical flashlight’s light bulb is a glass vacuum tube where the
flashlight’s batteries force current through the bulb’s filament, resulting
in a power loss equal to the square of the current times the positive
resistance of the filament. The power is then radiated out of the light bulb
as light and heat.

Physicists have known for many years that the pulsed abnormal glow of a
discharge tube has a negative resistance characteristic. What physicists
have not appreciated, until the development of the PAGD reactor, was the
real possibility or the knowledge of precisely how to go about extracting
'free' energy by exciting self-sustaining oscillations in the plasma
discharge.

The pulsed abnormal glow discharge (PAGD) reactor (U.S. Patents 5,416,391,
5,449,989, and 5,502,354) is an over-sized glass vacuum tube which is
constructed and electrically driven within a narrow range of DC voltage so
that it operates with negative resistance. Because of the reactor’s negative
resistance, other components with positive resistance such as light bulbs,
batteries, and motors can be inserted in the circuit without drawing energy
from the DC power source, up to the reactor’s maximum amount of negative
resistance.

The PAGD reactor’s function is based upon heretofore unknown spontaneous
emission properties of certain metals in vacuum and involves an anomalous
cathode reaction force. The reactor may be conceived of as a portable vacuum
battery made active only when needed.

The technology employs cold-cathode vacuum discharge plasma reactors to set
up self-exciting oscillations, in the form of pulsed abnormal glow
discharges triggered by auto-electronic emissions, in order to produce
power. The circuit is driven from a direct current source of impedance
sufficient to prevent establishment of a sustained vacuum arc discharge. In
combination with a special circuit, electrical power, in excess of the input
power needed for operation, can be extracted. The system, therefore, may
also be referred to as an over-unity system where net energy output greatly
exceeds net energy input.

The experimental data show numerous tests involving the discharge of a
source bank of 12-volt cells as the powered apparatus recharges an output
bank of cells and/or runs an electric motor. In one typical test run, within
20 minutes, 0.988 kilowatt-hour of energy is generated for an input of 0.258
kilowatt-hours. Power conversion gain performance efficiencies are clearly
shown in the figures by data plots on a scale that runs to 1000 per cent.
One power conversion gain efficiency cited was 483 per cent.

It seems that the PAGD reactor’s inventors have conquered the problem of
electrode over-heating after long duration running of many devices built
using different electrode configurations, shapes and materials. The PAGD
reactor’s development is now at the point where predictably 40
megawatt-hours of energy can be delivered from something of light-weight
construction that one can hold in one hand.

Imagine holding something that can deliver 2 kilowatts of electrical power
output and keep going for 20,000 hours. Then ask yourself when we can expect
to see self-powered electrical vehicles on our roads using somewhat larger
versions of those tubes.

Unlike the chemically-assisted nuclear reaction process, which outputs
low-grade heat, the PAGD reactor directly generates electricity at power
voltage levels, without any utilization of cold or thermonuclear fusion
principles. Another important feature of the apparatus is that it employs no
radioactive compounds and generates no nuclear radiation or radioisotopes.
The energy system is entirely pollution-free, self-contained and composed of
readily recyclable materials. Storage of the power produced may be carried
out by traditional means, be these mechanical or electrical.

At least three patents have so far been issued. One of the patents involves
an associated motor drive which provides for direct electromechanical
transformation of the energy accumulated within the reactor. Additional
patents covering various aspects and applications of the PAGD reactor are
being sought.

Energy conversion system applications for electric vehicles, stand-alone
power supplies and autonomous housing are currently under development. The
inventors hope that by making vehicles self-sufficient in terms of energy,
the PAGD reactor will offer the possibility of bypassing massive
infrastructure expansions in order to make the electric vehicle a feasible
reality while solving the problem of range which currently detracts from its
appeal. Other potential applications include pulsed lasers, inverters,
transformer and motor circuits. The inventors are presently engaged in
negotiating licensing agreements with a view to development of the
applications.


Testatika Free Energy Machine

The Testatika free energy machine was developed over a 20-year research
period in Switzerland. It resembles a Wimshurst electrostatic generator
commonly seen in high school physics labs. Other documents may refer to it
as the "Swiss M-L converter” or "Thesta-Distatica." The inventor of this
superb machine, Paul Baumann, claims its running principle was found by
studying the effects of lightning.

Testatika not only runs on its own energy but produces also a huge amount of
excess power. A video shows a demonstrator unit producing at least 3
kilowatts of power. Yet the machine is only about 70 cm wide, 40 cm deep,
and about 60 cm tall. It delivers DC voltage ranging from 270 to 320 volts,
only depending on the dryness of the air. At this voltage it can supply at
least 10 amperes of DC current.

Testatika is not a perpetuum mobile, but an energy machine that collects its
"free" energy from the charged and ionized air particles. Some technological
tricks are implemented to overcome the normal drag-resistance of a
conventional Wimshurst machine, which is still the secret of the Swiss
group. However, progress is being made by several researchers in the
underground science network in deducing and explaining the basic mechanisms
of this remarkable machine.

The initial high voltage, at high frequency, is produced by twin
counter-revolving electrostatic disks made from magnetic stainless steel.
The magnetic disk segments provide an electromagnetic speed control for the
disks, while functioning as electrostatic elements to provide the very high
voltage.

The solid-state amplification subsystem consists of polarized sections of
barium-iron permanent magnets with multiple coil arrays, as first introduced
by Hans Coler in Germany during the 1940’s. This subsystem increases the
amperage level about 20 times from the 150 watts from the twin electrostatic
disks up to about 3000 watts at the output terminals.

An independent feedback subsystem provides the electromagnetic force to
power a small DC motor to revolve the twin electrostatic disks continuously.
This arrangement consists of two horseshoe magnets with coil sets wound
fully around each magnet leg. This feedback method provides that the
Testatika free-energy machine is a fully standalone system, with no external
power input. Once the two disks are turned by hand, they continue to revolve
on their own, producing free energy.

The Testatika machines (some smaller units also exist which only deliver
about 200-300 watts) are not yet mass-production type models. They are still
laboratory prototype units, although they are built with a very good
craftsmanship. No maintenance is required with these units.

Besides powering a Swiss commune of 3,000 people, at least four Testatika
free energy machines are reportedly in operation in Palm Springs,
California, Canada, Florida, and another western state. The parts and
materials for one powerful enough to electrify a house are estimated to cost
about $2,000. Two commercial sizes reportedly have been developed. The
smaller unit weighs about 50 pounds and generates 4 to 5 kilowatts. The
larger unit has two disks 3 meters in diameter rotating at 12,000 RPM and
generates 30 kilowatts.


GeoExchange Heat Pump

A refrigerator is a one-way heat pump that cools the inside of the box by
removing heat, which is then pumped someplace else. Cold air is not pumped
into refrigerators.

Conventional air conditioners pump hot air from the inside of a home into
the outside air. Because the outside air is already so hot in the summer,
the difficulty of pumping hot air into air that is already hot results in
low efficiency and high energy costs.

GeoExchange Heat Pumps are electrically-powered devices that use the natural
heat storage ability of the earth or the earth’s ground water to heat and
cool a structure. They are being promoted by the Geothermal Heat Pump
Consortium which claims that they can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40
per cent or more over traditional air conditioners.

At the Bella Vivente subdivision of Lake Las Vegas, Henderson, Nevada, their
GeoExchange system pumps heat into and out of homes with one loop of pipe
which is connected to the lake.  Residents save an average of $150 per month
in heating and air conditioning bills. Other advantages include eliminating
noisy and unattractive outdoor condensers and cooling towers.


Hydro-Magnetic Dynamo

Russian inventor Oleg V. Gritskevitch’s performance CLAIMS for his
"hydro-magnetic dynamo" are as follows:

Dynamos are scaleable from 100 kilowatts to 1,000 megawatts. Dynamos can
be built as large as 1,000 megawatts. Seven such dynamos can be stacked on
top of one another to make a single 7,000-megawatt unit about the size of a
two-car garage. For comparison, Hoover Dam’s 17 generators have a total
rated capacity of 2,000 megawatts.

A dynamo can reliably run continuously for 25 years or more with little or
no maintenance, no external fuel source, and no pollution. If a dynamo’s
output is 1,000 kilowatts, its total input power is approximately 10
kilowatts. So the dynamo’s energy efficiency is 10,000 per cent, or 100 to
1.

The source of the dynamo’s massive electrical output is a nuclear reaction
which is not generally known to mainstream science. However, it is known
that the dynamo produces alpha particles which are helium nuclei made from
fused deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen with one proton and one neutron. The
electrons missing from the helium nuclei are what seem to provide a copious
“sink” of electricity, and which happens to be the source of the dynamo’s
ability to generate an exceptionally large amount of electricity. It is also
known that the dynamo uses high-density charge clusters. High-density charge
clusters are the basis of plasma-injected transmutation of elements and
low-voltage nuclear transmutation of radioactive materials.

There were three dynamo prototypes built. The first two small experimental
prototypes were built in Vladivostok. The third and last prototype generated
electricity off and on from 1992 to January 1997 in Armenia. (It was sadly
destroyed during an armed rebellion by local religious fanatics unhappy with
the Armenian government.) It generated a constant current of 6,800 amperes
at 220 volts DC. That multiplies out to nearly 1.5 megawatts. In the winter
when lower temperatures allowed more efficient cooling, the power output was
increased to 2.5 megawatts. The Armenian prototype dynamo's toroid weighed
900 kilograms and had a diameter of approximately 2 meters.

Cooling water is circulated through copper pipes wrapped around the toroid.
The heat is expelled from the cooling water with a heat exchanger.

After a dynamo is assembled in a factory, the water is literally
jump-started (by discharging a large bank of capacitors) to moving around
the toroid. The dynamo's controls are temporarily set to generating enough
of a modest amount of electricity to sustain itself, even while being
transported from the factory to its site. For the Armenian prototype dynamo,
two 10-farad capacitor banks (from Russian military radar stations) were
used
to provide the initial water motion (acceleration and excitation of water).
Using a total of 20,000 joules, 100,000 volts with 0.05 amperes of current
were applied to the Armenian dynamo for 3 - 5 minutes for starting its
generation of electricity.

After these Russian radar capacitors were used to jump-start the Armenian
prototype dynamo, a bank of buffer batteries sustained continuous operation
when water motion and ionizing occurs. This battery bank contained 8
powerful 12-volt, 150-ampere lead batteries. The Armenian dynamo's
sustaining input power was 14,400 watts. (For comparision, in winter, the
Armenian dynamo's output power was 2,500,000 watts.) Once, the output
current was accidentally increased to 40,000 amperes for almost a minute.
Fortunately, the power was reduced to a safe level before the water started
to boil. Internal coils (windings) control water velocity and therefore
dynamo power.

The dynamo's production cost is estimated at $500 per kilowatt which is
competitive to nuclear power’s capital costs of $5,000 per kilowatt,
windmill capital costs of $4,000 per kilowatt, etc. A well-run nuclear power
plant can generate power for 1.5 cents per kilowatt-hour, coal 1.8 cents,
natural gas 3.4 cents, and oil 4.1 cents, on the average. The dynamo’s
operating cost would be approximately .1 cent per kilowatt-hour with no
external fuel needed nor pollution.

Dynamos could replace all nuclear power plants, solar installations,
wood-buring furnaces, hydro-electric dams, windmills, fossil-fueled power
plants, etc. Satellites, locomotives, heavy trucks, airplanes, and ships are
obvious transportation applications. It does not seem that dynamos can be
made compact enough to power electric cars although it certainly would be
worth trying.

A Forbes article states that PECO (formerly Philadelphia Electric Company),
with an income stream to back it up, was able to sell on Wall Street $4
billion worth of bonds paying 5.8 per cent. A dynamo manufacturer could
simply sell bonds to build and operate dynamos at a low interest rate.
Dynamo loan payback times may be in the ball park of a half-year to a year,
depending on the local electricity market price.  As soon as a dynamo is
paid for, the revenue from that time on would be almost pure profit. Once a
track record is established by successfully installing a few dynamos, the
dynamo company could raise money to build more dynamos by simply selling
billions of dollars of bonds instead of stock. So therefore, there wouldn't
be any dilution of ownership.

A recent IEEE Spectrum article stated that world demand for electricity
increases approximately 500 megawatts every day. To put this in perspective,
the equivalent of another Hoover Dam would have to be built every four days
to keep up with world electricity increase demands. Or, a dynamo
manufacturing company would have to build another 500-megawatt dynamo every
single day to keep up with world electricity increase demand in addition to
replacing all existing generators fueled by hydro, nuclear, and fossil
fuels.

The following is a translation, with slight editing for increased clarity,
of the "Description" of the dynamo's Russian patent. The numbers in the
"Description" refer to the patent's drawing which is attached to this email.
Note that while the drawing shows 4 electrodes, the dynamo actually uses 32
electrodes.

The Description
IPC  H 02 K 44/00
Method of deriving of electrical energy and organization of Gritskevich’s
MHD-generator for its realization

This invention is regarding a new source of energy, i.e., about deriving an
electric power by using MHD-generators.

The method of deriving of energy [1] (in particular thermal) by means of
organization of movement of water in certain direction inside a closed loop
is already known. The given method uses unique properties of water which
cause a release of energy as an outcome of a rupture of hydrogen
connections. Along with a thermal, an outcome of electrical energy occurs.
However, the given method does not allow to receive electrical energy in a
suitable for use kind. In a similar method [2] (with not only usage of water
but with any polar liquid as a substitute) a proof of outcome of additional
liquid energy occurs and it’s just on the part of the process of a cold
nuclear fusion and cavitational processes. The given method isn't intended
for deriving electrical energy as well.

An organization and method of deriving of electrical energy [3, 4] are known
by means of organization of movement of ferromagnetic spheroids in certain
direction inside closed channel when the voltage, obtained as a result of an
electromagnetic induction, was used with the help of electromagnetic
windings. The device realizing this method contains tightly closed
(hermetically sealed) toroid-style channel, in which a conducting media and
electromagnetic system with windings have been placed (as ferromagnetic
spheroids). The device and the method have low efficiency, are rather
complicated and have low reliability.

An organization and method of deriving of electrical energy [5, 6] are
known, and were chosen to be a prototype, by means of organization of
movement of a conducting media in certain direction inside closed channel,
in the case when obtained electrical energy is used by electromagnetic
windings. Ionized gas is used as a conducting media. The device that
accomplishes the realization of this method (the MHD generator) contains a
closed (sealed) toroid-style channel whose body is made from a non-magnetic
material, whose inside part is covered by dielectric material, and
electromagnetic system with windings as well. Both the organization and
method have low efficiency, are rather complicated and have low reliability.
In addition, this (known) method is not ecologically safe.

Ultimate purposes (goals) of prospective engineering solutions are the
following: increasing of efficiency, reliability and ecological safety, and
simplification of a construction of the  MHD generator as well.

The indicated goals can be achieved as follows.

In the known (mentioned before) method of deriving of electrical energy by
means of organization (controlling) of movement of a conducting media in
certain direction inside a closed  (sealed) loop when the electrical energy
is derived by electromagnetic windings, new point is the fact that a polar
liquid is used as a media, which liquid gets ionized and actuated even at
the start-up time by a running magnetic field with the help of stimulating
electromagnetic windings, and the movement of a media is organized
(controlled) inside a tightly sealed channel (circuit) whose internal walls’
factor of a dielectric permeability is greater than the polar liquid’s one .

The liquid can be ionized by a high-voltage discharges or with the help of
disk made from a non-magnetic material, who is gyrating inside the channel
with a liquid.

Liquid’s movement can be stabilized with the help of tight hermetically
sealed chamber, filled-in with a polar liquid. And the chamber has
electromagnetic windings and it is connected to the channel.

If a water is being used as a liquid, it can be preliminary activated by
adding heavy water.

In the known (mentioned before) device of the MHD-generator containing a
closed toroid-style channel with a body made from a non-magnetic material,
whose inside part is covered with a dielectric material, and electromagnetic
system with windings as well, a new point is the fact that the channel is
built tight (hermetically sealed) and is filled in with a polar liquid,
where the factor of the dielectric permeability of the covering material is
greater than the liquid’s one.

A water can be used as a liquid, containing heavy water as an option.

The MHD-generator can contain a tight (hermetically sealed) stabilization
chamber, having  a junction with the channel, placed outside of it in the
internal area of a toroid. In this case the chamber can be built as a
cylinder, whose axis lies in the plane of a middle axis of the toroid-style
channel.

MHD-generator can contain a device for ionization of the liquid, which
device can be built either as electrodes (placed inside the channel and
joined with a source of high-voltage periodic voltage), or either as a disk
made from a non-magnetic material (placed the same way inside the channel
and kinematically joined with the drive of rotary movement).

The electromagnetic system can contain force (power) windings and windings
of stimulation which can be physically placed inside the channel.

A segnetoelectrical material can be used as a cover of walls of the channel.

These inventions are explained (accompanied) by drawings (figures), where on
dr.1 (fig.1) the general view of the generator as shown, and on dr.2 (fig.2)
the transversal slit (section, cut) is shown.

The invention is explained on the example of hydro-magnetic dynamo of
Gritskevich (OGRI).

The dynamo contains hollow toroid-style body 1 of a cermet (metal +
ceramics), whose internal surface is covered with a synergetical stratum
(layer) 2, and the concavity is filled in with a pure (distilled) water 3
with added heavy water in it. In the body’s channel 1 electrodes 4 (made
from a hard-alloy material) are placed, connected to a power supply, and
also stimulation windings 5 connected to the power supply are placed. Inside
the body’s ring 1 a cylindrical stabilization chamber 6 (made from a cermet)
connected with the body’s channel 1 is mounted. The internal surface of the
chamber 6 is covered with a synergetical stratum (layer) 7 as well, and the
concavity is filled in with pure (distilled) water 8 with added heavy water
in it. The body 1 and the chamber 6 have force (power) windings 9 and 10 at
the outside.

Hydro-magnetic dynamo works the following way. The partially pre-ionized (on
the part of the heavy water) water 3 gets ionized further by the
high-voltage discharges by electrodes 4. With the help of windings 6 a
running magnetic field is being created, which field creates movement of
water 3 in one direction inside the body’s channel 1. An electromotive force
gets created by the electromagnetic induction in windings 9. During the
movement of the water stream free electrons get created, and an additional
energy gets emitted because of water’s friction (viscosity) 3 against the
stratum (layer) 2, and because of electrostatic breakdowns of
cavitatal-vacuum structures and of the ongoing reaction of the cold nuclear
fusion. In this case the energy’s (power’s) volume received in the windings
9 can be greater than the energy’s volume wasted for liquid‘s ionization and
start-up by the electrodes 4 and windings 5. Moreover, the presented
organization and method do not conflict with the energy conservation law.
Because the redundant energy (in relation to brought-up energy) gets emitted
from the water 3 and from the internal stratums (layers) 2 as well, which
are due for replacement after certain interval of usage. The stabilization
of the liquid’s movement 3 gets created during the interaction (-e) of
charges in it with other charges in the chamber 6. The electric power from
windings 10 also can be used.

Information sources:

1. Application ??? WO 90/00526, 1990.
2. Patent RU No2124681, 1999.
3. Copyright certificate USSR No753372, 1980.
4. Patent  USA No3496781, 1967.
5. Patent RU No2071163, 1996.
6. Application RU No95110712, 1997.


High-Temperature Incinerator

This simple process reportedly incinerates garbage, sawdust, and wood chips
at such an unbelievably high temperature that even thermocouples at 3200
degrees burn up. So little odor and smoke is produced that a prototype was
tested indoors. Very little waste is left behind which needs to be trucked
away. The high-grade heat from this type of incinerator can be used for
generating electricity and producing process heat.


Small-Scaled Energy Production

Large-scaled centralized electrical generation facilities typically require
costly fuel, pollute, use up large areas of land for generators and power
lines, are unsafe in the case of nuclear, have limited operating lifetimes
of a few decades, and inherently subject large regions to blackouts. The
country where the resort complex is to be located currently is expanding its
electricity generating capacity by building large-scaled fossil-fueled power
plants.

Small-scaled decentralized electrical generating units ideally do not
require any costly fuel, do not pollute, only require a square meter or two
of floor space, are standalone and do not interlock with a power grid, and
are dependable.

What are referred to as “renewable” energy sources are receiving much
attention and R and D support. They include producing and using hydrogen as
a fuel, fuel cells, solar, and wind. Some types are already in use such as
windmills, solar water heaters, and solar box ovens for cooking. (I myself
own and use a solar box oven with excellent results, particularly with
baking delicious potatoes.) While the intent is laudable and much clever
engineering has been accomplished, solar and wind, for example, are
inherently not completely satisfactory sources of energy.

The international underground science research network seems to focus mostly
on developing unconventional new sources of energy. The basis of many of
their devices is extracting energy in some fashion from what is variously
called
the omnipresent "ether", "aether", "zero-point energy field", and "vacuum
energy field".

The hydrosonic pump (see above) is a rare example of an unconventional new
source of energy which is actually being commercially manufactured and sold.
The pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor is one of many examples of
unconventional new sources of energy that, to my knowledge, are not
currently being commercialized.

The country’s people may be interested in starting up a massive new industry
specializing in researching and commercializing new sources of energy,
particularly etheric energy. They could follow a path similar to Taiwan
becoming a strong computer manufacturer, for example, even though Taiwan is
merely an out-of-the-way island.

Since such an organization is a new concept with me, what follows are some
thoughts I have come up with:

Our first task should be to try to define somewhat just what is it the new
organization is supposed to research and commercialize. The mission of Ether
and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., (which seems as good a name as any
other) would be to take advantage of this small country’s freedom from
scientific dogma and pioneering entrepreneurial spirit in researching and
commercializing applications of etheric energy, the existence of which is
pooh-poohed by practically all physicists.

The potential applications of etheric energy are diverse. Major categories I
can think of are:

Over-unity gain energy conversion by rotating magnets and electronic
circuits

Plasma-injected transmutation for radioactivity amelioration, thermal energy
production, and manufacture of scarce elements out of more plentiful
elements

High-density charge clusters

Radiovoltaic, petrovoltaic, and super-capacitor batteries

Self-powered electric vehicles

Niches in agricultural technology

Medical treatment devices

Self-powered heating, air conditioning, and ventilation equipment

Stand-alone power supplies for appliances, office equipment, instruments,
etc.

Anti-gravity

Etheric weather engineering

Shape power

Space flight

Archaeology

Machine tools

Electrical power generation

Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., should establish a close
relationship with the local university’s engineering departments for two
reasons:  One would be to build up, organize, and document the theoretical
underpinnings of ether engineering. The other would be to train and inspire
young engineers in the exciting new field of ether engineering.

There was a similar situation during the 1950’s and 1960’s where Stanford
University’s electrical engineering faculty helped start the computer and
semiconductor companies of the now fabulously successful Silicon Valley. I
see a similarly wealthy “Ether Valley” starting up in the country’s capital
city. It could be a sound business decision for several reasons:

The country could get rid of its coal-fired power plants.

The country could ensure its long-term financial and energy survival by
commercializing new sources of energy and other applications of etheric
energy while its primary electrical energy generation and distribution
business gradually disappears.

Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., could greatly enhance the
livability of employees, customers, friends, relatives, and shareholders who
live in the country by eliminating smog, reducing living costs, improving
health standards, controlling the weather, and removing unsightly power
lines and transformers.

PacifiCorp Holdings, Inc., an Oregon public utility holding company and the
third largest power utility west of the Mississippi River, has already set a
precedent by investing $1,000,000 in Blacklight Power, Inc., of Malvern,
Pennsylvania. Blacklight Power is developing an exotic new source of clean
energy from ordinary water. Either an electrolytic cell or gaseous potassium
ions in a vacuum compress hydrogen atoms into lower-energy-state hydrogen
atoms called “hydrinos”. When the hydrinos are formed, energy is released
which in magnitude is between chemical and nuclear energy. Blacklight has
ambitious plans for retrofitting fossil-fueled and nuclear power plants.

Blacklight is developing a 100-kilowatt generator which can power a car
100,000 miles on a tank of water. Blacklight Power, Inc., also claims on its
Web site that it is developing a 10-kilogram battery which can supply 150
horsepower for 1,000 miles. Parked in a garage, it would seem that the car’s
battery charger could feed electricity back into the electric power grid and
help pay for the car. Unfortunately, generators in homes and small
businesses pose a safety problem for power company workers who normally
assume the power is off from the central generating stations when there is a
blackout.

The price of Blacklight Power’s stock in private offerings has increased
from $.75/share in 1991 to $1,500/share in 1996 (not publicly listed). A
recent stock offering sold $5,000,000 in one week and may close at
$10,000,000. Because energy is one of the world’s largest industries,
Blacklight Power offers an example of how lucrative a validated new source
of energy can be. (Blacklight Power's interesting Web site is
http://www.blacklightpower.com .)

As a public service, I would be happy to work part-time as an advisor to
Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc.

I am acquainted with many of the key scientists and inventors who have done
so much to create physical etheric devices as well as develop ether physics.
I think I can easily line up an advisory board of highly qualified technical
consultants.

There seems to be a high likelihood of productive ether engineering research
that could be accomplished for two or three more decades. The initial
emphasis of Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., should be to
commercialize an existing inventory of devices and technologies that are at
least close to being ready to market and to which Ether and Charge Cluster
Engineering, Inc., could acquire licenses and rights. It should be reminded
that commercialization of any inventions is contingent upon acquisition to
patents, licenses, rights, territories, application fields, etc.

I am certain that a modest amount of advertising in publications which cover
the ether and charge cluster engineering fields such as New Energy News,
Electrifying Times, Journal of New Energy, Exotic Research, Planetary
Association of Clean Energy, Space Energy Journal, Nexus, and Infinite
Energy - Cold Fusion and New Energy Technology would attract additional
inventors.

However, it is crucial that Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc.,
first establishes a reputation for being fair and responsible when
negotiating with inventors for the rights to their inventions. It is also
crucial that Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., recruits competent
staff not only for engineering and management, but also for evaluating the
reality and economic worth of ether-related inventions.

The human species has laboriously pulled an impressively diverse mix of new
energy technologies out of the dark hole of its ignorance. (I have counted
about 50 new sources of energy in this report.) Sometime in the future,
Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., could conceivably find a
particular energy technology it has commercialized in competition with some
other energy technology. By simultaneously commercializing a variety of
ether-related energy technologies, I am confident that profitable niches in
the immense energy business as well as applications of etheric energy to
industries unrelated to energy production can be found for many years to
come.

What follows is a sampling of energy inventions - at least nearly all of
which could be candidates as small-scaled energy production units and, in
some cases, even as off-grid electricity generators. Please keep in mind
that some may require additional development and/or verification.


High-Density Charge Cluster Technology.

Nearly solid-state electrical energy converter (U.S. Patent 5,018,180) with
a stable over-unity power conversion gain of approximately 5. The gain can
be cranked up to a maximum of approximately 100 but then loses stability. A
fax sent August 1996 reported that it now “appears capable of providing 1
kilowatt of thermal energy plus 1 kilowatt of electrical output per cubic
inch with a power supply (small) and heat exchanger”. The high-density
charge cluster device also offers ease of manufacture as well as
compactness. It is thought that this new technology is so fundamental that
ultimately 1,000 doctorate theses could be researched and written by
academia. For example, one university is researching flat-panel displays
based on high-density charge cluster technology. High-density charge cluster
technology appears to be a credible candidate for an advanced self-powered
electric vehicle’s on-board battery charger.


Low-Energy Nuclear Transmutation - A Primer for Non-Physicists.

The physics of high-density charge cluster technology can be explained
somewhat by the following which was written primarily for non-scientists.
Low-energy nuclear transmutation is thought by some to be the basis for
these technologies mentioned elsewhere in this compilation of advanced
technologies:  pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor, cold fusion reactor
with thermal-to-electric conversion, fiber-based cold fusion power cell,
hybrid cold-fusion hydrogen reactor, and gas-phase catalytic fusion.

Atoms comprise of negatively charged electrons whirling around a relatively
small nucleus of neutrons and positively charged protons. Protons have a
mass 1836 times the mass of electrons. A neutron is a combination of an
electron and a proton with zero net electrostatic charge. An atom’s number
of protons and its equal number of electrons determine its type of element.
Only when a positive ion (such as a proton or nucleus of a helium atom)
penetrates an atom’s nucleus does the atomic nucleus become another element
(or another isotope of the same element) or becomes unstable and splits
(fissions) into two or more elements.

For decades, physicists have assumed that changing (transmuting) elements
always requires high energies. Elaborately expensive machinery was required
to accelerate a positively charged particle of less than atomic size to a
high enough energy to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of an atom’s
nucleus and penetrate its interior.

The inaccurately named “cold fusion” is only one of several types of
physical phenomena which indicate the existence of a mechanism by which
elements could be changed to other elements without seemingly requiring very
high energies. However, the secret of cold fusion’s excess heat had remained
a mystery until September 13, 1996 when Kenneth Shoulders explained how the
fracturing of palladium loaded with hydrogen (deuterons) could produce
high-density charge clusters and cause nuclear reactions. Based on this
evidence and on the pioneering work of Rod Neal and Stan Gleeson, a trio of
physicists, Hal Fox, Robert W. Bass, and Shang-Xian Jin, finally deduced a
more complete theory of the nature of the mechanism which extends beyond the
discovery of cold fusion. The magnitude of their fundamental scientific
discovery can best be appreciated by considering that Hal Fox’s Fusion
Information Center, Inc., has collected over 3,000 papers on cold fusion
since its discovery in 1989 without anyone else being able to offer a
complete understanding of just how cold fusion works.

What follows is a simplified explanation of their remarkable concept using
an analogy of electrons as ping pong balls and protons as bowling balls.
Visualize a room with one wall as the positive plate connected to the
positive terminal of a battery, and the opposite wall as the negative plate
connected to the battery’s negative terminal. Each ping pong ball is
negatively charged and when released at the negative wall, electrostatic
repulsion/attraction will cause the ping pong ball to fly across the room to
the positive wall. Each bowling ball is positively charged and when released
at the positive wall, it will roll slowly in the opposite direction across
the room to the negative wall.

Both the ping pong ball and the bowling ball have an equal but opposite
electrostatic charge. So therefore they both draw the same amount of
electrical energy from the battery as they fly or roll from one wall to the
opposite wall. But because the ping pong ball is so much lighter than the
bowling ball, the ping pong ball will strike the opposite wall at a much
greater speed than the bowling ball.

Now assume that 1,000,000 ping pong balls are released as a cluster at the
negative wall. (At a high enough density, electrons will forget their mutual
electrostatic repulsion and cluster in the same manner as ball lightning.
Mother Nature sometimes pulls weird tricks.) Embedded in the ping pong ball
cluster are 10 bowling balls. Because there are so many more negatively
charged ping pong balls, the positively charged bowling balls are going to
stick with the ping pong balls and ignore the attraction of the negative
wall and the repulsion of the positive wall. So therefore the bowling balls
hitch a free ride along with the ping pong balls. When the bowling balls hit
the positive wall along with the ping pong balls at the same speed as the
ping pong balls, the bowling balls will hit the positive wall with
enormously greater energies than if they had hit the negative wall, rolling
slowly alone, in the opposite direction.

In the same manner, protons (and other types of positive ions) in
“low-energy” nuclear reactions are hurled into the nucleus of atoms by their
“piggy-back” ride on high-density electron charge clusters with sufficient
energy to split or transmute atoms. This mechanism apparently is the secret
of cold fusion’s excess heat, eliminating radioactivity, transmutation of
common elements into scarce elements, and powerful new atom smashers small
enough for college physics laboratories. If the new theory holds up to
scrutiny by other physicists, it might win a Nobel prize in physics.


Cold Fusion Reactor with Thermal-to-Electric Conversion.

These are small reactors similar to electrolytic cells which produce more
thermal energy than their electrical energy input. Power gains have
reportedly been measured as high as several hundred. When atoms are being
transmuted under specialized low-energy conditions, thermal energy is
released. The heat can be directly converted to electricity. The electricity
could then be transmitted to another geographically separate site and used
to power two or more reactors. Reactors could in theory be cascaded
indefinitely. Two drawbacks of cold fusion are the requirement for water and
the need to occasionally replace electrodes. Some cold fusion researchers
have changed the terminology to “low-energy nuclear transmutation”.


Hybrid Cold-Fusion Hydrogen Reactor.

This reactor is intended to be an economical super-efficient heater for
homes and as a hot water heater. The device is so new that its potential
ultimate electrical input-to-thermal output conversion gain is yet to be
experimentally determined. Applications could include heating homes and
other buildings, greenhouses, and fish tanks. The electrodes are made of
nickel. Because the country has nickel deposits, it could manufacture its
own hybrid cold fusion hydrogen reactors.


Gas-Phase Catalytic Fusion.

Activated carbon catalysts are loaded with various precious metals (by
weight, in the range of 0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent). Palladium works best
so far. When these catalysts are heated, considerable excess heat is
produced reliably when such catalysts are exposed to several atmospheres of
heavy hydrogen gas (deuterium gas). Pairs of deuterium atoms are fused to
produce waste helium-4 atoms plus abundant clean heat. No lethal radiation
is released. One cubic kilometer of ocean water contains enough deuterium
that when catalytically fused, the energy released equals the chemical
combustion energy in all of the earth’s known oil reserves. With suitable
insulation, the process, once started, is self-heating. Temperatures can
rise well above the boiling temperature of water. Engineered with efficient
heat exchangers, thermal/electrical energy generators can be built in sizes
for applications ranging from mobile homes to large centralized generating
stations. No electrolysis is involved nor are finicky electrodes required as
with some other types of low-energy nuclear transmutation devices. However,
the device’s requirement for rare precious metals such as palladium could
hinder widespread use.


Fiber-Based Cold Fusion Power Cell.

This is a cold fusion reactor which is highly competitive with the Patterson
Power Cell. Patents have been applied for. Demonstration products could be
manufactured and prototypes readied for distribution within six months after
funding. International Nickel Company is considered a strong strategic
partner. (The resort’s country has nickel deposits.)


Light-Polarizing Photovoltaic Film.

The light-polarizing photovoltaic film known as LUMELOID (trademark) is a
stretch-oriented polymer film about 0.3 microns thick which mimics
photosynthesis. Light energy is absorbed in a molecular antenna which
converts it to electron energy. The electron energy is then rectified by a
molecular tunnel diode comprising an electron donor, an insulating space and
an electron acceptor. Voltage and current is generated in the plane of the
film parallel to the stretch axis.

Conventional silicon photocells are 25 per cent efficient in theory, but in
practice attain only 4-10 per cent. The silicon concentrator cell
theoretically has a 32 per cent efficiency, but in practice has reached only
15 per cent, and is too expensive.

LUMELOID (trademark) has a theoretical efficiency of 72 per cent. Initially
its efficiency is expected to be comparable to existing photocells. However,
because of the film’s high theoretical efficiency, with further R and D,
LUMELOID (trademark) is expected to soon surpass conventional photocell
efficiency. More importantly, the low cost per watt of LUMELOID (trademark)
represents a tremendous cost decrease over presently available sources of
solar energy and would facilitate its early acceptance in the energy market.

The projected cost of the basic LUMELOID (trademark) thin film is $1.00 per
square meter, and the assembly which comprises a LUMELOID (trademark) film
on a substrate with microelectronics circuitry, is about $5.00 per square
meter. Its capital investment cost is about 30 cents per watt. This is a
fraction of all conventional electric energy producing technologies. The
capital cost of fossil fuel generation from large power plants is over $1.50
per watt, nuclear energy is more than $6.00 per watt, and present
semiconductor photovoltaic devices are more than $4.00 per watt.

LUMELOID (trademark) will be available in rolls at low cost, affording easy
transportation, and any amount of power during sunlight hours by just
rolling it out flat on any surface. Eventually with the development of
QUENSOR (trademark), which is like a very thin battery (see below), a
combined LUMELOID (trademark)-QUENSOR (trademark) sheet may be spread out on
a roof or on the ground, and will provide electric power day and night,
available on demand.

"Diad" is an acronym for Donor-Insulator-Acceptor-Device which acts as a
diode. Molecular diads have been chemically synthesized. LUMELOID
(trademark) incorporates diads in a stretch-oriented electrically conductive
polarized film. The linear polarizing molecule in the film acts as antennae
to absorb a resolved component of the energy of the light photons in the
plane of the film. Diads are essential in LUMELOID (trademark) to convert
the energized electrons to unidirectional (DC) electric power.

When two polarized films are positioned with their stretch axes
perpendicular, light is almost completely absorbed. Using two crossed films
with electrodes connected in series or parallel, ordered diads in LUMELOID
(trademark) enable the conversion of light to electric power at 72 per cent
theoretical efficiency. This principle was demonstrated at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory by converting microwave to DC electric power using
rectifying antennae at 82 per cent efficiency.


Femto Diode Photovoltaic Glass Sheet.

The LEPCON (trademark) femto diode concept is similar in principle to
LUMELOID (trademark), which provides a technology mimicking photosynthesis,
absorbing light energy with a molecular antennae structure, and rectifying
the electron energy by the known phenomena called electron tunneling. In
contrast to LUMELOID (trademark), however, LEPCON (trademark) comprises the
durable materials of sub-micron metal on a glass substrate sheet. (A “femto”
is one quadrillionth (10-15)).)

A device for fabricating LEPCON (trademark) photovoltaic sheets in
commercial production is called “Supersebter”, an acronym for Super
Submicron Electron Beamwriter. The Supersebter utilizes 100,000 rows and
100,000 columns to position 10 billion electron emitters on a square meter
sheet by a lithographic process. This process produces 10 billion electron
beams simultaneously to write the nanostructure patterns of femto diodes on
the sheet. A square-meter LEPCON (trademark) photovoltaic sheet could be
produced in twenty seconds at a cost of about 50 cents per watt and a
lifetime expectancy of over 50 years.

LEPCON (trademark) panels could be utilized by utility companies in solar
farms. It has been calculated that LEPCON (trademark) panels covering a
150-kilometer x 150-kilometer area in a desert region could produce over
250,000 MW of electric power, enough for most of the United States.

This successful commercial fabrication of the LEPCON (trademark) femto diode
structure should lead to many other advanced nanostructure devices. For
example, computer circuitry could be miniaturized 100-fold, efficient laser
lighting devices could be produced, and vast improvements could be made on
high-definition 2D to 3D TV flat-panel displays. (The 1993 Alvin Marks
patent on a monomolecular resist significantly increases the resolution of
the nanostructures.)


Quantum High Energy Density Storage or Retrieval Device.

Essentially a very thin battery, the solid-state Quantum High Energy Density
Storage or Retrieval Device (QUENSOR (trademark)) has an energy density of
about 1-15 kilowatt-hours/kilogram, which is comparable to gasoline, or
more. A fundamentally new principle and a new method of manufacture is
employed.

Electric energy is stored or retrieved from quantum dipole electric fields
throughout the volume of the QUENSOR (trademark) film. Electric energy is
stored in the QUENSOR (trademark) film by charging the dipole electric
fields from an electric energy source. Electric energy is retrieved from a
QUENSOR (trademark) film by discharging the dipole electric fields and
supplying the energy to a load. Electric breakdown in the film is avoided
because positive and negative electric charges in the film are balanced
everywhere. Busbars attached to metal layers are connected to terminals for
charging or discharging the QUENSOR (trademark) film.

A composite photovoltaic LUMELOID (trademark) and QUENSOR (trademark) panel
may be used for the storage or retrieval of solar-electric energy day or
night on demand.

Eight patents protecting the LUMELOID (trademark), LEPCON (trademark), and
QUENSOR (trademark) technologies have been issued, and additional patent
applications have been filed.


Buried Contact Multijunction Thin Film Solar Cell.

In the past, to produce high-performance solar cells, expensive high-quality
solar cell material were required.This new solar cell approach produces high
efficiency cells but with the use of much lower quality material than
previously possible; material 100-1,000 times lower in quality than the
worst presently used in commercial silicon cells. Using this approach, the
major material costs in making the modules becomes the cost of the glass
used in the modules.

The approach involves the deposition of a very thin layer of silicon upon
the glass cover. During deposition, fluctuations are introduced in the
properties of these layers to produce a multilayer structure. Three separate
ideas are combined:

The first new idea is to use a multilayer structure, which provides the
tolerance to the use of low quality material; material 100-1,000 times
poorer than the worst used in present commercial cells. The second is using
a laser grooved approach which allows correct contacting to each of the
layers in the cell. The third is the automatic series interconnection of the
cells which results from the laser grooving approach and greatly simplifies
module fabrication, contributing to low processing costs.

High efficiency can still be obtained by this approach but with material
costs not appreciably higher than the glass used in the modules. In the
normal approach, material costs alone are over $2 per watt of electrical
output. In the new approach, material costs are only about 10 cents per
watt, about 20 times smaller. Total solar power costs are expected to be
cheaper than fossil or nuclear power.


Solar Hydrogen Producer.

This simple device efficiently uses all solar wavelengths to make hydrogen
in abundance. The hydrogen could replace natural gas in pipelines, and be a
base for the so-called “hydrogen economy”.


Hydrogen Tank.

A hydrogen tank was developed by the same inventor (now dead) of the above
solar hydrogen producer that is so safe it can be punctured with rifle
bullets.


Super-Steam Technology.

This machine combines compressed air, untreated or even polluted water, and
almost any combustible fuel to produce steam at any pressure or temperature.
The response is instant compared with a conventional boiler taking hours to
reach operating pressure and temperature. The efficiency is over 90 per
cent, which compares favorably with a conventional boiler’s efficiency of 40
per cent. Maintenance costs, fuel consumption, and air pollution all go way
down. 3500 applications have been found for super-steam technology.
Electricity can be generated for 1 cent per kilowatt-hour. Super-steam
technology can be scaled from the size of a one-pound coffee can to a house.

Super-steam technology could be combined with the aforementioned solar
hydrogen producer and hydrogen tank for on-site renewable energy uses.


Double-Exposure Flat-Plate Solar Collector.

Apparently combines photo-voltaic and solar thermal collecting.


Environmental Heat Engine.

Has some similarity to refrigerator or heat pump. Working fluid of ammonia
or carbon dioxide is expanded by propane heater, cold fusion thermal
reactor, or environmental heat to move pistons. Applications include vehicle
engines, small-scale on-site electrical generators, and large-scale water
lifters for dams and canals. (Could double electrical output of Hoover Dam.)
This is a variation of Dennis Lee’s low-temperature phase-change engine
which the inventor (now dead) claimed is superior to Lee’s engine.


Brown Nuclear Battery.

Small “nuclear” battery uses tritium to power small circuits and electrical
devices for several years. Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen with
a half-life of 12 years. These nuclear batteries use beta emitters which are
similar to devices used in smoke detectors and to illuminate wrist watches.
The key approach is the methods used by the inventor to “funnel” the emitted
beta particles (electrons) into the affiliated circuits so that a useable
voltage is produced.

The Brown nuclear battery has many uses, especially for computer-chip
applications. A very small “nuclear” battery can be used to power a computer
chip or computer chip set for several years. The battery could be about the
same size as the packaged chip and be mounted directly on or adjacent to the
chip. Many other applications are available. The nuclear radiation consists
of beta particles which are electrons and can do no harm unless the battery
material is ground up and swallowed.


Perpetual Battery.

The hyper-cap E-converter is a thick quarter-sized battery which would put
out .001 watt “forever” for such applications as critical components inside
fail-safe computers, cellular telephones, etc. The energy comes from tapping
ether fluctuations.


Clem Over-Unity Vegetable-Oil Engine.

Richard Clem was a heavy equipment operator who had noticed that a hot
asphalt sprayer would continue to run for up to an hour even after the power
was turned off! So he built a modified version as a 200-pound engine which
ran on vegetable oil at 300 degrees and was started by a 12-volt battery.
The heat is internally generated by the engine. During a nine-day test
conducted by Bendix Corporation engineers, the engine in its self-running
mode consistently generated 350 horsepower into a dynamometer. The engine is
constructed from off-the-shelf components except for a hollow shaft and a
custom cone with enclosed spiral channels.

If the automobile industry adopts the Clem over-unity engine, motorists
could change its eight gallons of vegetable oil only every 150,000 miles and
never buy any gasoline. To illustrate the engine’s durability, the only
working model of the Clem engine has been continually running on his son’s
farm for several years.

Combining the Clem over-unity engine with the hydrosonic pump at the resort
area could provide distilled ocean water as well as hot water for space
heating, kitchens, and bathrooms at no energy cost.

The Clem over-unity vegetable-oil engine is not patented. It may be fairly
straightforward to set up a small machine shop in the resort’s country for
manufacturing hollow shafts and cones. Off-the-shelf components could be
shipped in for subsequent commercial assembly and sale of Clem over-unity
engines. Hydrosonic pumps could be either shipped in or locally manufactured
under license and then combined with Clem engines into desalination units.
The market for efficient self-powered desalination units ought to be
enormous. Unfortunately, I have no idea as to the maximum practical size
that self-powered desalination units could be built.


Water Engine.

Hydrogen is formed by creating an underwater electrical discharge between
two aluminum electrodes. Aluminum wire is fed against a rotating aluminum
drum. A hydrogen-fueled 900-kilogram car runs 600 kilometers on 20 liters of
water and one kilogram of aluminum.

The required high voltage can be obtained from the battery, a generator off
the drive shaft, or two coils in parallel and fed from a conventional
distributor.

The hydrogen gas fills a small buffer tank which in turn supplies hydrogen
to the engine on demand. When the tank’s pressure exceeds a predetermined
level, the electrodes are separated so that hydrogen generation is
interrupted. As the pressure drops to a certain level, the aluminum wire is
again fed against the aluminum drum.


Converter of Zero-Point Electromagnetic Radiation Energy to Electrical
Energy.

The existence of zero-point electromagnetic radiation was discovered in 1958
by Dutch physicist M. J. Sparnaay. Zero-point electromagnetic radiation is
the same as the electromagnetic waves radiated from radio and television
antennas except that the frequencies are random, incoherent, are present
everywhere in the universe, and vary from zero cycles per second to
infinity. Other names include “zero-point energy field”, “vacuum field
energy”, “etheric energy field”, and “ether”.

Mr. Sparnaay had continued the experiments carried out by Hendrik B. G.
Casimir in 1948 which showed the existence of a force between two uncharged
parallel plates which arose from electromagnetic radiation surrounding the
plates in a vacuum. This force has since been named the “Casimir effect” to
honor the discoverer. (See “Casimer Effect Self-Charging Energy Cell”
below.)

Mr. Sparnaay discovered that the forces acting on the plates arose from not
only thermal radiation but also from another type of radiation now known as
classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Mr. Sparnaay determined that
not only did the zero point electromagnetic radiation exists in a vacuum,
but also that it persisted even at a temperature of absolute zero. Because
it exists in a vacuum, zero-point electromagnetic radiation is homogeneous
and isotropic as well as ubiquitous.

In addition, since zero-point electromagnetic radiation does not vary, the
intensity of the radiation at any frequency is proportional to the cube of
that frequency. Consequently the intensity of the radiation increases
without limit as the frequency increases. The result is an infinite energy
density for the radiation spectrum.

The special characteristics of the zero-point electromagnetic radiation of
having a virtually infinite energy density and that it is omnipresent even
in outer space make it very desirable as an energy source. However, the high
energy densities only exist at very high frequencies. These large energies
can be collected with small antenna-like structures (frequency is inversely
proportional to size). But the frequencies are so high that they are
unusable for practical energy uses.

With two antennas of very slightly different sizes, the converter collects
zero-point electromagnetic radiation of two very slightly different
frequencies. The converter then superimposes the two frequencies which
results in a far lower beat frequency. The energy contained in the beat
frequency is then transformed to practical electrical power which can be
made available in any location on earth or in space. Applications include
transportation, heating, cooling as well as many others.


Water-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine with Garrett Electrolytic
Carburetor.

Henry "Dad" Garrett and his son, Charles H. Garrett, in 1935 patented and
exhibited an automobile that ran on water substituted for gasoline.
Actually, the fuel was hydrogen after the water was broken down by
electrolysis. The only items needed to convert a gasoline-powered auto to a
water burner was an electrolytic carburetor and installation of a generator
of double normal capacity for the breaking down of the water. Instant starts
in any weather, no fire hazards, cooler operation and plenty of power and
speed were claimed.

Rather than store the inflammable hydrogen, the same process makes the gas
without a storage chamber in which the flames from the motor’s cylinders
might react. Water is broken down into its component gases by passage of an
electric current through it from electrodes immersed in the water. Hydrogen
collects at the negative pole, and oxygen collects at positive. The hydrogen
is then mixed with air and introduced directly into the cylinders. For an
ordinary automobile, an electrolysis chamber of about a quart in capacity is
big enough.

In summary, this simple process can provide:

Heat - through the burning of hydrogen/oxygen.

Power for local energy generation - the explosive energy to drive a piston
to drive a shaft to power a generator. The generator then charges a battery
network which feeds an inverter (converts DC to AC) to run your house.

Motive power for transport power - explosive energy drives the piston to
drive your vehicle.

Light - condoluminescence - hydrogen/oxygen exposed to phosphor-coated
surfaces for light generation.

Sound amplification - flame speakers where flame is electrostatically
deflected at audio rates to produce sound. The hydrogen/oxygen mix is
generated locally rather than using bottled gases such as propane, butane,
etc.


Papp Engine.

Joseph Papp was granted US Patent #3,670,494 for his “Noble Gas Plasma
Engine”. A mixture of recycled inert gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton,
and xenon) is exposed to a high-voltage discharge in a sealed cylinder with
a piston. The spark causes the gases to expand violently though no
combustion occurs. Mechanical energy is delivered by the piston's
displacement. The gases immediately collapse to their original density, and
the cycle is repeated. After several thousand hours the gases lose their
elasticity and are replaced. The operating cost is 15 cents an hour.

The first prototype was a simple 90-horsepower Volvo engine with upper end
modifications. Attaching the Volvo pistons to pistons fitting the sealed
cylinders, the engine worked perfectly with an output of three hundred
horsepower. The inventor claimed it would cost about twenty five dollars to
charge each cylinder every sixty thousand miles.

There were indications that such an engine could provide its own electrical
power and being a closed system, require no fuel. It is not by definition an
electromagnetic engine, however. It is believed that at the heart of the
Papp engine is the development of high-density electrical charge clusters
which provide the energy to expand the gases.

Other patents are 5319336, 4151431, 3670494, 4046167 - Mechanical
Accumulator, 3680431 - Method and Means for Generating Explosive Forces, and
4,428,193 - Inert Gas Fuel, Fuel Preparation Apparatus and System for
Extracting Useful Work from the Fuel.

A demonstration of the Papp engine to representatives of the Stanford
Research Institute resulted in killing one person and injuring another. Papp
himself is believed to have died from apparent neutron radiation from his
engine.

Jim Kettner of the Space Energy Association recently stated in a letter to
me that this is the best self-running device he knows of which can produce
substantial amounts of power. A variation of the Papp engine is currently
being built by Jim Sabori and, if sufficiently funded, was to have been
ready by the end of 1998.

In a recent letter from Hal Fox of Trenergy, Inc., Fox states that he
believes that the Papp engine works but hopes that much simpler ways of
making energy can be developed. There are several groups working on versions
of the Papp engine. It seems to keep recycling through the new-energy
community.


Muller Motor/Generator.

Electrical generators in common use require external torque from gas,
hydroelectric, and steam turbines, for example, to overcome back
electromotive force. Bill Muller’s magnetic motor/generator eliminates back
electromotive force. The coils are removed from the rotor and instead
wrapped around powerful magnets equally spaced around the stator. Magnets
are also equally spaced around the rotating disk. However, the number of
rotor magnets is one more than the number of stator magnets.

A typical commercial motor involves pushing and pulling magnetically where
in the Muller motor/generator only the magnetic pulling effect occurs. A
perfectly balanced arrangement of the magnets results in a disk-like rotor
that can be turned with no effort at all. The completely reversible result
is if current is applied to the stator coils, the rotor turns. If the rotor
is turned, the stator coils can generate current to be supplied to a load.

The stator coils are wrapped around cores made of inexpensive
Muller-patented amorphous material which eliminates heat-producing
hysteresis and eddy current losses. Because of instantaneous saturation and
permeability, much less wire is needed for the stator coils which greatly
reduces both ohmic resistance losses and inductance losses. No brushes are
needed like in conventional direct current generators and motors which wear
out. Bearing friction losses are greatly reduced by both weight reduction
and using Muller’s cone-shaped magnetic bearings (patent applied for).


Electrical Generator.

Two pairs of electromagnets warp permanent bar magnet’s magnetic fields
across field coils to achieve over-unity electrical energy conversion gain,
the magnitude of which is unknown. Requires additional resonant circuit
components. Appears to be a potentially robust generator of electricity.


Self-Contained Power Supply.

Uses tightly wound coil spring, flywheel, and magnets to achieve over-unity
energy conversion gain. Potential market is as a battery pack replacement.


Motor/Generator.

Incorporates permanent magnets which provide the drive torque by pulling
rotor and stator poles together with an electromagnetic opposed excitation
input pulsation used to weaken that magnetic pull to allow the poles to
separate. Power output claimed to be 3 times power input.


WIN Zero Point Electrical Energy Converter.

Extracts AC current with an output power over input power gain as high as
268.6 per cent.  It generates electricity by collecting electrons between
E-dam cermets in a vacuum. A charge of electrons is oscillated in a tank
circuit, and energy is collected or added to that charge from the vacuum.
The mechanism is believed to be the Casimer effect. Solid-state with no
moving parts and no size restrictions, individual units can be built to
power a 15-kilowatt home or a 20-megawatt arc furnace without outside energy
input.


Conversion of Aluminum Internal Combustion Engines to Magnetic Motor.

Heads replaced with magnet arrangement so that the vehicle doesn’t need fuel
nor battery recharging. Two-inch square Chinese super-magnets are embedded
in the piston heads. Same-size magnets are embedded on outside of disks
mounted on shaft, one magnet to each cylinder. A toothed gearwheel mounted
on the front end of the shaft is linked by a chain drive to a gearwheel on
the crankshaft. An electric motor is mounted on the block to turn the
crankshaft. As crankshaft rotates, when each piston is up closest to top of
the cylinder, its matching magnet is also at its angular point closest to
the head. The two opposing south poles repel each other with 1,000 lb. of
force. (This compares with the approximately 250 lb. of force on the piston
head in a gasoline engine.)

The engine would still need oil changes every 50,000 to 80,000 miles.
Because it runs cool, the block could be made of hard plastic which ought to
be of cheaper material and easier to mold and machine than aluminum. A
constant-speed motor, it would require a continuously variable transmission
in order to power a vehicle. If the electric motor is replaced with a Muller
magnetic motor (see above), the combined energy conversion gain is projected
to be about 300.


Searl Effect Generator.

The Searl effect generator (SEG) can be used to charge the batteries in a
self-powered electric vehicle. A solid-state device, the heart of an SEG is
a series of three concentric magnetic rings with magnetic rollers going
around the rings. Both the rollers and rings are comprised of four layers of
titanium, iron, nylon, and neodymium.

The magnetic fields impressed on the rollers have both AC and DC components.
The AC component is for floating the rollers so they don’t touch the rings.
The DC component is to prevent them from flying off.  The innermost set
contains a minimum of 12 rollers for the same reason that a linear motor
will not operate with less than 12 phases.

The inner set of rollers travel around at 250 miles per hour, the middle set
travels at approximately 600 miles per hour, and the outer set at
approximately 1500 miles per hour. Hundreds of millions of volts are
generated the energy of which is picked up by brushes positioned all around
the outside set of rollers.

An SEG also creates an anti-gravity field. An uncontrolled SEG will rise
about 50 feet as the rollers increase speed, emit a light blue halo which
indicates energy is being extracted from the ether, and then shoot up into
the sky gaining speed, never to be seen again. At least one roof has been
holed by an SEG. The friction-less rollers can be prevented from reaching
the critical velocity that produces lift by use of a “governor”, either
mechanical or electronic.

An SEG can be easily controlled by immersing it in an electromagnetic wave
field the frequency of which is a harmonic of the SEG’s primary frequency.
While in resonance, the magnetic poles of the rollers reach a unification
state, and they stop moving.

The inventor has built and flown a small “inverse gravity” vehicle. A flying
saucer-like SEG-powered aircraft about the size of a bus is currently being
built in England by a private group.

The inventor for some years independently powered his house off the power
grid with a home-sized electrical generator version of the SEG. A
householder could set up a 45 x 45-cm unit and generate an output of 11
kilowatts of free electrical power.

Oddly, a house powered by an SEG has been observed to have greater healing
powers than conventionally electric powered houses. The healing effect is
claimed to be due to the electrons zapping the occupants, taking away pain
and returning blood more quickly to damaged tissue. The SEG would also help
combat asthma, bronchitis, hay fever and lung complaints due to the
increased supply of oxygen in the body. Conventional methods of electric
power do not pump out electrons which results in tired eyes and a tired
brain.

The SEG's negative charge also means that dust stays in the carpet instead
of floating in the air. This is similar in action to negative ion generators
sometimes sold as air fresheners.

A German power company is reportedly considering replacing a nuclear power
station with eight fuel-less SEGs costing a total of about $4.5 million and
generating a total of 240 megawatts with no pollution.


Gravito Magnetic Device.

The gravito magnetic device (GMD), also known as the David Hamel machine, is
a cheap version of the Searl effect generator (SEG) (see above) that can be
built with off-the-shelf components. The GMD has magnets attached to radial
spokes or arms that are jointed. These magnets are floated in a magnetic
housing and when properly biased, continue to spin, gaining momentum and
speed with each rotation and achieving the same tremendous electrostatic
buildup on the outside rim as the SEG.

The parts inside the GMD are configured in such a way as to promote an
enclosed constant variation of opposing magnetic fields. In the resting
state, the moving cones are balanced and stabilized in a magnetic field
repulsion, like a magnetic bearing. The startup of the GMD is initiated by
lowering a magnet at the center top of the shell, inside the shell, towards
the momentarily magnetically balanced moving cones.

As the center magnet, which opposes the one attached at the center of the
upper moving cone, is lowered inside the GMD, it forces the upper cone to
move sideways, shifting the magnetic balance between the cones inside the
GMD. The cones stay offset to each other for a short while and then
plasma-like energy starts to build up around the GMD. This energy built up
creates a shift of colors from red-orange to light blue and then white.
Following this effect the GMD starts to lose weight and quickly generates an
upper lift in a greater ratio than its total weight.

It should be emphasized that the power generated, surrounding the GMD, is
extremely powerful and radiates, causing interruptions of electron flow in
normal electrical systems, i.e. lights, cars, transformers, and interferes
with electromagnetic transmissions. So it is without saying that this
machine has to be operated with serious caution when completed and
activated. However, if a control system is in place, it is easy to stop its
effect. One of the main purposes of GMD research is to understand the
effects of enclosed opposing magnetic fields that have varying vector
angles.

The GMD is potentially a versatile, useful technology which also generates
antigravity. The GMD has a powerful upward thrust causing it to rise in the
air in a manner similar to a Searl effect generator (see above). (The first
assembled model after two hours of increasing spin velocity unexpectedly
crashed through the roof and escaped.) When the inner workings of what
causes the secondary electrogravitational fields are understood, it is
probable that various devices can be created providing plentiful energy of
different types.

It should be noted that all building materials for the GMD are readily
available almost anywhere in the world, and the cost is relatively cheap. A
lot of hand work is required but nothing that is unreasonably unattainable.
No special machining or parts are required. Only patience and devotion is
needed.


Casimer Effect Self-Charging Energy Cell.

The force of gravity is theorized by some scientists as the ether weakly
pushing two objects such as a book and the earth into each other’s shadow.
Gravity can also be thought of as the long-range version of the Casimer
effect. The Casimer effect predicts that two metal plates close together
will attract each other.

Consider the plates set at a certain distance apart. In the space between
the plates, only those ether (vacuum) field fluctuations for which a whole
number of half-waves just spans the distance can exist, just like waves
formed by shaking a rope tied at both ends. Outside the plates, the
fluctuations can have many more values because there is space. The number of
modes outside the plates, all of which carry energy and  momentum, is
greater than those inside. This imbalance PUSHES THE PLATES TOGETHER.

The proprietary Casimer effect self-charging energy cell contains many
extremely thin layers of carbon, magnesium, chromium oxide, and a couple of
other elements and compounds. The result is analogous to a boat that has
some rather large leaks. More water pours into the boat as fast as water is
bailed out. Likewise, as electromagnetic energy is drawn out of the Casimer
effect self-charging energy cell when inserted in an electrical circuit,
energy is drawn in from the surrounding ether. Physically and functionally,
the Casimer effect energy cell is like a solid-state battery that recharges
itself with some valuable features such as simplicity and compactness.


Switched Reluctance Motor.

The switched reluctance motor is a motor design that has been around for
many decades but has never been commercialized. The inventor of the Casimer
effect self-charging energy cell is also developing an efficient commercial
version of the switched reluctance motor specifically designed with modern
switching components. The intended end use is for powering electric
vehicles. The switched reluctance motor has the key advantages of ease of
manufacture, simplicity, and allowing complete vehicle motion control. No
claims are being made that it is capable of over-unity power conversion.

Most self-powered electric vehicle power train concepts involve combining an
over-unity motor (to extend the range between battery charges) with an
on-board battery charger and a pack of batteries or super-capacitors. The
Casimer effect self-charging energy cell offers some important advantages
such as much simpler mounting of one to several battery-like cells in the
vehicle’s engine compartment and greatly increased maintainability and
dependability. With the cells’ self-charging capability, the efficiency of
the vehicle’s electric motor thus becomes less of an issue. Electric motor
features such as controllability, manufacturing cost, simplicity, and
reliability can thus be given much greater consideration.

This particular self-powered electric vehicle power train combination may be
the best one. If plugged into the electric grid while parked in the owner’s
garage, the revenue from running the electric meter backwards could
eventually pay for the vehicle’s purchase cost.


Joe’s Energy Cell.

The Joe’s energy cell basically comprises of two metal containers, one
inside the other. Both containers are filled with specially charged and
cleaned water with the inner container perforated to allow water to freely
move between the inside and outside of the inner container. The outside
container is electrically connected to the anode of a battery, and the inner
container connected to the battery’s cathode. The outside container is
closed except for an orifice to which a thin pipe is attached. The other end
of the pipe is attached to the outside housing of the carburetor of a
gasoline engine. Gas/energy is transferred to the carburetor through the
pipe. The entire cell including the pipe must be electrically insulated from
the engine.

Various designs and shapes of both containers have been experimentally
built. The original and simplest comprised of both containers as long pipes
with the inner pipe, which was perforated, inside the outer pipe.

At least fourteen vehicles in Australia have been fitted with different
versions of Joe’s energy cells to be driven without fuel nor battery
charging. The engine, radiator and exhaust pipe stays cold enough to freeze
water – warranting replacing water in the block with transmission fluid. The
timing does have to be advanced between 25 and 80 degrees, depending on the
type of engine, to allow the engine to run smoothly. The engine’s power
doubles over that when petrol-fueled.

The Joe energy cell is not explainable using conventional mainstream
physics. It is not even known if the process inside the cylinders is
implosion, explosion, or both. No gasoline is mixed with air inside the
carburetor. It appears that zero-point energy is somehow drawn from the
ether and converts the air entering the cylinders into some kind of fuel.
The inventor claims the process increases the frequency and energy of the
air.

For converting existing gasoline-powered vehicles into self-powered vehicles
which don’t require fuel nor battery charging from a local electric utility,
adding the Joe’s energy cell seems to offer by far the easiest modification.
Nearly the entire engine is left alone. A separate heater would have to be
provided since the engine runs cold. The vehicle will not rust, and paint
will not oxidize.

Guy McCarthy guy@... has provided the following insightful
analysis of the Joe energy cell from a biodynamics perspective:

[0.1] The "Joe Cell" (described in NEXUS magazine, Aug-Sep '98, pp. 43-46)
is an electrical device attached to the carburetor of an ordinary automobile
engine which allegedly enables it to run for extended periods with the fuel
line disconnected.

[0.2] Biodynamics is a science of natural forces and agriculture inspired by
the Austrian philosopher Rudolf Steiner. It pre-dates "Organics" as the
original alternative to chemical/industrial agriculture. Biodynamics has
achieved limited recognition in the United States and Canada, but is widely
practiced in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia.

Main Text:

[1.0] The Joe cell uses water as a storage medium, which, when charged
above a certain threshold, collects additional energy as needed by the
engine. The initial charge is not depleted as the engine runs, but will
dissipate under certain conditions. This matches a key attribute of the
biodynamic ether, which attracts more ether to itself once the local
concentration reaches a certain threshold. Without adequate boundaries (or
storage conditions) the etheric charge build-up will dissipate.

[2.0] The motive reaction in the engine seems to be *implosion*, since the
ignition timing must be advanced so far into the compression stroke. (Note
that 80 degrees is nearly 2/3 of a typical compression cycle, which totals
about 135 degrees in a 4-stroke engine.) Implosion may be considered
equivalent to "a sudden condensation of the ether" which is also thought to
be the motive reaction that creates lightning and thunder in the atmosphere.
According to biodynamic researchers, condensation is a state change from a
more rarefied ether into a less ratified one, releasing energy in the
process.

[2.1] Biodynamics deals with four states of ether which are equivalent to
the four elements intuited by ancient philosophers:

Warmth Ether corresponds to the Fire element
Light Ether corresponds to the Air element
Tone Ether (or "Chemical Ether") corresponds to the Water element
Life Ether corresponds to the Earth element

[2.2] In the physical world, substance tends to flow from a high potential
to a low potential. This is what the concept of "entropy" and the Second Law
of Thermodynamics are based on. But in the etheric world of living energies,
the inverse is true. Ether is naturally attracted to itself and flows from
low potential to high potential. This is why living organisms continue to
draw nutrients and life forces into themselves while the rest of the world
is supposedly running down. Ether penetrates substance, and substance
influences ether. This dynamic interplay is essential to life on the
physical plane.

[2.3] Under favorable conditions, the following etheric condensations will
occur:

Warmth Ether --> Light Ether, releasing energy as lightning
Light Ether --> Tone Ether, releasing energy as thunder
Tone Ether --> Life Ether, releasing energy as biological manifestation

[2.4] Recall that lightning and thunder sometimes occur independently of
each other (as in "heat lightning" and "rolling thunder"), while at other
times they are closely linked. Clearly any reasonable explanation for these
phenomena must allow for both cases. The common notion that lightning and
thunder are caused by static discharge between air masses is clearly
untenable. A buildup of static charge in such magnitudes could only occur
under extremely dry conditions; the typical thunderstorm is certainly not
dry.

[2.5] The biodynamic researcher points to a well-defined cumulus cloud in
mid-summer as the ideal collector of etheric energy. Hour by hour it grows,
drawing abundant warmth ether from the atmosphere into itself as well as
particles of dust and moisture. The cloud builds itself taller and taller -
its boundaries sharply distinct from the rest of the sky. Eventually the
cloud becomes saturated - turning darker and forming a mighty thunderhead.
At this point, anyone who is familiar with weather patterns in open country
is headed for shelter. They know that a violent thunderstorm could be
unleashed at any moment.

[2.6] Just a few months ago the author observed such a phenomena in central
Maryland. The top of the cloud was puffy and brilliant white, illuminated by
the late afternoon sun. In contrast, the bottom was flat and dark, laden
with moisture. Great bolts of lightning began to crackle about its upper
regions. The air felt clear and energized while all around trees were
bending and twisting in sudden gusts of wind. When the storm finally broke
it was both fearsome and beautiful, a mighty discharge of lightning,
thunder, and rain.

[2.7] We can surmise that the Joe cell becomes highly charged with etheric
energy, and that this charge is transferred through the carburetor to the
air entering each cylinder. As the compression stroke begins the volume of
air is compressed, causing a further concentration of etheric charge. Soon
the air becomes saturated with ether. At this point conditions in the
cylinder are similar to those within the thunderhead. The ignition spark,
far advanced into the compression stroke, serves to catalyze a condensation
reaction of the compressed ether. This sudden change of state causes the air
mixture to contract sharply, generating power through the remainder of the
compression stroke. Therefore the air mixture in each cylinder undergoes a
structural change, not a chemical one, and the flywheel is driven by
*suction* rather than combustion. With the exception of small amounts of
vapor from engine oil and perhaps trace elements from the engine and
muffler, the exhaust should be of substantially the same quality as the air
intake.

[2.8] Since warmth ether is the most rarefied ether, condensation will have
the effect of reducing or consuming warmth. Therefore implosion is a cool
process, which tends to absorb heat rather than release it. This matches
observations of the Joe cell in which the engine runs cold. Unlike
combustion, implosion is a "living" process, and as such produces no waste
heat or by-products.

[3.0] All three styles of Joe cell are based on concentric, insulated
cylinders. This is similar to the classic "orgone accumulator" discovered by
Wilhelm Reich. Reich found that metals tended to conduct ether while organic
materials tended to absorb it. By layering the two types of materials
together, Reich caused a directional flow of ether to occur. The orgone
accumulator was a six-sided box constructed with alternating layers of metal
and non-metallic materials.

[3.1] The inclusion of a 1.5-volt battery to maintain the charged condition
(and a 12-volt battery to create it) is an interesting variation on the
orgone accumulator design. There is precedent for this idea in
electrogravity documentation that has become available in recent years. (See
the USAF report "Electrogravitic Systems" that was released in 1995 as well
as patents by T. Townsend Brown.) The basic idea is that a charged condenser
exhibits a tendency to move towards its positive terminal. This is thought
to result from a net movement of ether in the opposite direction (from
positive to negative). Therefore a static electric charge stimulates a
directional flow of ether.

[3.2] The Joe cell design implies a net movement of ether from positive to
negatively charged terminals (i.e. towards the center of the cell and
towards the engine).

[4.0] The transfer of energy to the carburetor is accomplished by several
different conductors including plastic, copper, aluminum and rubber tubing.
The common material in all of these configurations is the *air* inside the
tubing. This is consistent with the biodynamic view that oxygen is an
excellent carrier of etheric forces. (Fertile soils are said to contain 50
per cent air for just this reason.) The metallic carburetor housing would
conduct the etheric energy to its interior surfaces, where incoming air
would absorb it and carry it into the cylinders.

[5.0] In conclusion, the Joe cell offers a compelling view of how ordinary
combustion engines might be modified to run on natural etheric energy. This
could be an important direction for future research. Validation of the
concept could be approached in three phases:

[5.1] Collecting a high concentration of etheric charge. For some ideas on
how to accomplish this, see "Geometric Energy Fields" at
http://www.twelvestar.com/sourceworks/ which includes specific instructions
for building resonant etheric devices.

[5.2] Stimulating a sudden condensation of ether by means of electric spark
and measuring the implosion effect in a pressurized container.

[5.3] Achieving reproducible evidence of successive implosion events within
a small engine mounted for laboratory testing.


Advanced Self-Powered Electric Vehicle Concept

Electric vehicles are clean, quiet, powerful, require much less maintenance
than gasoline or diesel-fueled vehicles, and inherently much simpler and
easier to manufacture. Their drawbacks have been a short range, long battery
recharging time, and a heavy, bulky battery pack. Clearly, self-powered
electric vehicles, if they could somehow be designed and manufactured at a
reasonable cost, would be a commercial success. Forbes January 25, 1999
compares golf carts (400,000 already sold) with personal computers.
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/99/0125/6302088a.htm

Self-powered electric vehicles at minimum must satisfy four requirements:
The battery ideally should not have the disadvantages of conventional
lead-acid batteries such as temperature sensitivity, low charge-to-weight
ratio, toxic materials, and finicky slow recharging. The electric motor
should be durable and highly efficient. Heating and air conditioning must be
provided. The really key difference from conventional electric vehicles is
having an on-board battery charger.

Electric bicycles with only one battery are inherently more practical than
conventional electric cars or trucks carrying a half-ton or so of batteries
stuffed into every available nook and cranny of the vehicle. When just one
battery out of one or two dozen batteries fails, the dead battery can be
time-consuming to find before replacement. Once a dead battery is replaced,
it could be a short time before another battery fails again. Besides
weighting much less and with the batteries taking up much less space, a
self-powered electric vehicle with an on-board battery charger would require
at most only a few batteries.

What follows is a discussion of candidate technologies which could be
combined into a reliable, commercially successful advanced self-powered
electric vehicle.


BATTERY

Alvin Snaper’s Power Technology Battery.

Las Vegas resident Alvin Snaper (600 patents and new products) through his
company, Power Technology, Inc., is developing a superior new battery with
none of the drawbacks of all other types of batteries such as temperature
sensitivity. Increasing the surface area of the electroplates by up to 1000
times greatly increases current output and allows much quicker
charge/discharge rates. Different chemistry reduces the weight of the
battery by 50 per cent, reduces cost, and is much more environmentally
friendly than lead. (For more information, see
www.powerpwtc.com/business_of_issuer.htm.)

Maxwell Technologies Ultra-Capacitor.

Since there is no heat nor waste product buildup as with electrochemical
batteries, ultra-capacitors can easily last many hundreds of thousands of
extremely rapid and deep charge/discharge cycles. They can supply repeated
bursts of power for fractions of a second to several minutes. They are
especially useful for supercharging power for accelerations or climbing.
With their quick recharge capability, ultra-capacitors can easily capture
regenerative braking energy, extending the range of the vehicle. For
increased safety, they can be stored, assembled, maintained, and transported
while completely discharged. Since the energy stored is directly related to
the voltage, the amount of available energy can be easily monitored. This
precision eliminates the need for sophisticated state-of-charge algorithms.
Other advantages include temperature insensitivity and low maintenance.

Capacitors are inherently more capable than electrochemical batteries of
withstanding quick discharges of electricity to the motor when the driver
demands high acceleration by stepping on the throttle. It is conceivable
that ultra-capacitors could be combined with batteries to take advantage of
the best performance characteristics of both types.

Maxwell Technologies' commercially available PowerCache (trademark)
ultra-capacitors pack up to 100 times the energy of conventional capacitors
and can deliver ten times the power of ordinary batteries. Their
ultra-capacitor is a double-layer capacitor incorporating a unique
metal/carbon electrode and an advanced non-aqueous electrolytic solution. As
a potential is applied across the terminals, ions migrate to the
high-surface-area electrodes. The combination of available surface area and
proximity to the current collector provide an ultra-high capacitance for
this electrostatic process.

Ukrainian Capacitor-Like Battery.

The I. N. Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials Science, Kiev,
Ukraine, has invented an entirely new type of battery. Emtech LTD.,
Mississauga, Ontario is commercializing the battery and has applied for 11
patents. A set of conventional lead-acid batteries can propel a small
electric car for 100 miles or so, require several hours to recharge, and
weigh 1000 lb. An equivalent set of Ukrainian batteries is expected to weigh
approximately 200 lb., provide a much greater range of up to possibly
200-300 miles, require 15 to 30 minutes to recharge, and maintain full
voltage until 94 per cent discharge. The Ukrainian battery operates well in
the temperature range of -40 to +60 degrees centigrade. A side benefit of
the Ukrainian batteries is that they are made only of proprietary materials
which are environmentally friendly, plentiful, and inexpensive. (Dated 1993;
claims currently are not considered credible. Emtech LTD, which had the
commercialization license, recently went bankrupt. Nu Omnicomm Technologies,
Inc., of Salt Lake City, which has close ties to the I. N. Frantsevich
Institute for Problems of Materials Science, may be able to revive the
Ukrainian battery.)

A Ukrainian battery stores the charges in crystalline layers of a sheet-like
material similar in appearance to mica. Due to nonlinear quantum mechanic
effects, the electrical characteristic of each crystalline layer is that of
a capacitor as thin as one molecule. Since capacitance is inversely
proportional to thickness of the separation between layers, the practical
consequence of the Ukrainian battery is to electrically function in a manner
similar to that of a giant capacitor.

Ed Baldwin’s Super-Capacitor.

Similar in electrical function to the Ukrainian battery, Ed Baldwin’s
solid-state multi-layered “super-capacitor” has a very high dielectric
constant. It is believed ultimately capable of ten times the electrical
energy storage capacity per pound of lead-acid batteries.

Yasunori Takahashi’s ultra-capacitor.

The Takahashi ultra-capacitor is rated at approximately 20 farads at 25
volts in a volume of about one cubic centimeter.

Blacklight Power’s hydrino battery.

Blacklight Power is completing a 10-kilogram battery using hydrinos which
can supply 150 horsepower for 1,000 miles.

ON-BOARD ULTRA-CAPACITOR/BATTERY CHARGER

The famous inventor Dr. Nikola Tesla reportedly modified and drove a Pierce
Arrow automobile in 1931. Tesla’s car required neither gasoline nor external
battery charging. The power source was an array of vacuum tubes apparently
similar to photo-multiplier tubes. Before and since then, dozens of other
inventors claimed to have developed or are developing devices for converting
relatively small input power to larger output power.

It is generally inaccurate to say that their devices produce more energy
than they consume which would violate the widely accepted physical law of
the conservation of energy. The accurate statement to make would be that a
small external energy input causes very large internal energy to be
transformed into large external energy output (electrical, thermal, and/or
mechanical).

An on-board charger is required to keep the ultra-capacitor/batteries fully
charged while the vehicle is parked as well as when the vehicle is motion.
Parked in a garage, the car’s battery charger could feed electricity back
into the electric power grid and help pay for the car, if it were not for
potential safety problems for power company workers. Descriptions of some of
the more promising on-board charger technologies follow. (If only mentioned,
see additional details above.)

Blacklight Power’s “hydrinos”.

It is an exotic new source of clean energy from ordinary water.

Ken Shoulders’ high-density charge clusters device (U.S. Patent 5,018,180).

A nearly solid-state device, it ultimately may put out one kilowatt of
electricity and one kilowatt of thermal energy per cubic inch. Its gain can
be increased so that it puts out 100 times as much power as its input
electrical power. However, the device’s power conversion gain is more stable
with the gain at about 5 times. (Still being researched.)

Trenergy’s plasma-injected transmutation, Dr. Case’s gas-phase catalytic
fusion, fiber-based cold fusion power cell, and the hybrid cold-fusion
hydrogen reactor have electric-to-thermal energy conversion gains as high as
well over 100 to 1. Their energy comes from high-density clusters of
electrons carrying small numbers of protons at very high velocities to
target nuclei using relatively low voltages.

W. A. Lambertson’s WIN zero point electrical energy converter extracts AC
current as high as 9.908 amperes using an input current of only 0.2596
amperes. It generates electricity by collecting electrons between “E-dams”
in a vacuum. A charge of electrons is oscillated in a tank circuit, and
energy is collected or added to that charge from the vacuum. Solid-state
with no moving parts and no size restrictions, individual units may
eventually be built to power a 15-kilowatt home or a 20-megawatt arc furnace
with an efficiency of 1000% or ten times the external input power.

The Correas’ pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor is an over-sized glass
vacuum tube which uses high-density charge clusters to produce useful
positive AC-to-DC electrical power conversion gains such as 483 per cent.

Converter of Zero-Point Electromagnetic Radiation Energy to Electrical
Energy. Converts very high frequencies of natural fluctuations of the
universal electromagnetic radiation field to usable electrical power at much
lower beat frequencies.

John Searl’s Searl effect generator has three concentric rings of magnetic
rollers. Brushes positioned around the outer ring of rollers pick up
electricity.

Frank Richardson’s electrical generator. Two pairs of electromagnets warp
permanent bar magnet’s magnetic fields back and forth across field coils to
achieve over-unity electrical energy conversion gain. Requires additional
resonant circuit components.

ELECTRIC MOTOR

Of the many types of electrical rotating machines that have been developed,
of particular interest are those which are claimed to incorporate permanent
magnets in order to develop more mechanical output power than their
electrical input power. Such claims are considered suspect by many skeptics
since they apparently violate the so-called law of conservation of energy.
Skepticism is often reinforced by frequent power gain measurement errors.
However, it has also been suggested that the key to over-unity power
conversion gain in such motors is to use super-powerful permanent magnets at
a very high rotating speed. A so-called “super-efficient” electric motor,
besides providing motive power, could also act as an on-board
capacitor/battery charger whether the vehicle is cruising, idling, or
parked.

Perm-Mag Motor.

An over-unity energy converter claimed to have a gain of up to several times
of shaft rotational power over electrical input power, the super-efficient
“perm-mag” motor generates 1 horsepower per pound of weight. Used in a
self-powered electric vehicle, a 50-pound, 50-horsepower electric motor is
equivalent to a 250-horsepower gasoline-fueled engine.

The perm-mag motor’s inventor, Ronald Brandt, has successfully demonstrated
a 10-pound, 10-horsepower prototype. Further research is expected to lead to
a substantial increase in energy conversion gain over the reported gain of
400 per cent. A 50-pound, 50-horsepower model (equivalent to a
250-horsepower gasoline-fueled engine) is currently being mounted in a
Chrysler New Yorker for testing. Its companion controller, which is required
to complete the resonant circuit for achieving over-unity gain, has been
designed. It is not known yet whether a separate on-board battery charger
will still be needed for a completely self-powered electric vehicle.

It should be noted that just because a motor can produce more mechanical
power than its electrical input power does not necessarily mean that it is
suitable for powering an electric vehicle. An electric vehicle motor ideally
should have a number of other characteristics such as reversibility,
complete variable power control, complete variable speed control, braking,
and stepping. It is understood that the perm-mag motor meets all performance
requirements for powering electric vehicles. It is not known how the
perm-mag motor specifically compares with other types of over-unity motors.

Minato Over-Unity Permanent Magnet Motor.

The Minato motor (US Patent 5,594,289) is a bicycle wheel-like disk that is
self-starting and self-rotating. On one half of the disk is mounted a
counter weight comprising of a single curved piece of aluminum spanning 180
degrees. Each of the several individual magnets on the other half of the
wheel are slightly symmetric, crescent shaped, and nested. They are
magnetized end to end with their north poles pointing out.

The motor is actuated by using the energy of a battery to move the north
pole of a large permanent magnet (the drive magnet) towards the wheel. As
the drive magnet approaches within several inches of the wheel, the wheel
starts to spin. As the drive magnet is moved closer to the wheel, the wheel
spins faster. The particular orientation of the wheel when it is at rest
seems to have no effect on how rapidly the wheel starts to turn. When the
drive magnet is moved away from the wheel, it coasts rather quickly to a
stop.

In May 1997, a working prototype was demonstrated at the First
International New Energy Conference in Seoul, Korea. It used 150 watts power
input and produced 450 watts output on a sustained basis. A December 1997
report, possibly not true, states that a large unit was being manufactured
in Japan that comprises of four connected 10-foot-long units that can power
30 homes. A smaller unit for powering individual homes has also been built.

An unimpressive summer 1998 Mexico City demonstration of a half-ton unit
showed an output of about one horsepower. This test result appears to show
that the horsepower per unit weight efficiency of the Minato motor is about
the same as one horsepower per horse.

Other Over-Unity Magnetic Motors.

There are several other types of magnetic motors claimed to have over-unity
energy conversion gain such as the ones that have been developed by Aspden,
Reed, Watson, Takahashi, Bergman, Johnson, Labine, and Marinov. For example,
Teruo Kawai of Tokyo, Japan recently obtained U.S. Patent 5,436,518 for his
“Motive Power Generating Device”. The patent’s key statement is as follows:
“Electric power of 19.55 watts was applied to the electromagnets at 17 volts
and 1.15 amperes.  … an output of 62.16 watt was obtained.” Dividing the
output power by the input power yields an efficiency of 318 per cent.
However, as stated above for the perm-mag motor, such motors may not
necessarily have all the characteristics needed for powering electric
vehicles. Power gain measurements also can be tricky.

COMPRESSED AIR-DRIVEN AIR CONDITIONER/HEATER

Alvin Snaper has patented a compressed air-driven air conditioner/heater. It
relies on the principle of a vortex tube. Air whirled in a vortex tube
separates with the cold air molecules collecting in one portion of the tube,
and the warm air molecules collecting in another portion of the tube. The
cold air is expelled from one end of the tube, and the warm air is expelled
from the other end. It can be switched between providing 90 per cent cold
air and 10 per cent warm air, or 10 per cent cold air and 90 per cent warm
air.

The metal tube is about a foot long and a half-inch in diameter with a
two-inch long compressed air intake tube perpendicularly attached about
three inches from one end. The intake compressed air requirement
specifications are 7 CFM at 40 PSI. The volume of air expelled is twice that
of a refrigerant-type automobile air conditioner while requiring only
one-fourth the horsepower. Also, no warm-up period is required as with
conventional air conditioners or heaters. Its efficiency is nearly 30 per
cent.

The vehicle would have a redundant pair (for increased reliability) of air
compressors for pressurizing the vehicle’s tubular frame which would also
serve as a storage chamber. The heavy (no fuel economy requirement) and
strong (for safety) tubular frame would help distribute compressed air to
the power steering, power brakes, power seats, power windows, windshield
wipers, door locks, air conditioner/heater, and a computer-controlled air
ride suspension system.

CONTINUOUS CLIMATE-CONTROL SYSTEM

Since the vehicle’s on-board super-capacitor/battery charger is expected to
keep the super-capacitor/batteries charged even while the vehicle is parked,
the vehicle’s interior temperature could be thermostatically controlled at a
comfortable room temperature 24 hours per day, seven days a week regardless
of the exterior temperature.

LOW-TEMPERATURE DIAMOND COATINGS

Durability would be enhanced by coating parts such as shock absorbers with
diamond using a new nondestructive low-temperature coating process which
also was patented by Alvin Snaper.

ADVANCED COMPUTER-CONTROLLED SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

Computer-controlled hydraulic shock absorbers as well as the
computer-controlled air ride suspension system would be supplied by Aimrite
Systems International, Inc., which owns the patents. Aimrite's
Computer-Optimized Adaptive Suspension Technology (COAST) system replaces a
vehicle's conventional shock absorbers with specially designed hydraulic
shock absorbers. The COAST system utilizes a sophisticated computer and
position sensors to monitor the vehicle's level at each corner. The
computer's microprocessor checks the sensors 240 times per second and
optimally regulates the damping on all four shocks based on this input. The
firmware used in the microprocessor is patented and represents the most
important element in the COAST system. It controls nine dynamic and static
parameters of motion (roll, pitch, sprung natural frequency, unsprung
natural frequency, pumping down, stored energy, topping out, bottoming out,
and height).

The COAST system is not only totally automatic, but it monitors and controls
the vehicle's ride performance on a continuous basis providing soft and
stable ride characteristics at all times as needed. The ride is comparable
to active systems without the need for pumps nor high-speed servo-valves.

Each shock absorber is actually a complementary pair of shock absorbers
mounted in opposing vertical compression/rebound modes. The computer sends
signals to valves to release pressure as required. Aimrite considers its
shock absorbers more durable and react faster than competing
computer-controlled shock absorbers which apply pressure when needed.  A
built-in safety factor is that if the computer fails, the result is
conventional damper operation, and failure of an individual damper is
equivalent to failure of a conventional shock absorber.

Aimrite’s air ride suspension system replaces a vehicle's front coil springs
and rear leaf springs.  The air suspension comprises of a high-quality
control subsystem that includes the aforementioned dual redundant air
compressors, air dryers and filters, position sensors, computer-controlled
solenoid valves, and a dashboard-mounted control to ensure proper operation
and a long and reliable life of the air suspension in all weather and
driving conditions. While stopped or driving, the control subsystem allows
the operator to easily maintain the correct ride height under all loading
conditions. For example, the chassis can be raised for a bumpy ride and
lowered for stable highway driving. The vehicle body is automatically
leveled at all four corners, even when parked on an uneven surface.

Aimrite’s suspension provides a full air suspension ride, with increased
comfort and control. Built-in safety capabilities are provided that
virtually eliminate traditional problems associated with air ride suspension
systems.

Combining Aimrite’s two computer-controlled suspension systems would offer a
luxurious ride with sports-car control and additional features at a
reasonable price.

MONOCOQUE (UNIBODY) BASALT/CARBON FIBER FOAM BODY/FRAME

Developed by the I. N. Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials
Science, Kiev, Ukraine, basalt/carbon fiber foam is extremely strong yet
lighter than fiberglass. Test vehicle made with basalt/carbon fiber foam
parts was only vehicle ever tested that can cut through a cast-iron London
taxicab in a collision.

MARKETING

By combining these superb new technologies into an advanced self-powered
electric car that would be superior to any other car even envisioned, it is
evident that it should not be very difficult to sell a reasonably priced car
which would offer the following features:

Continuous climate control even while parked.

Computer-controlled luxurious ride with sports-car control and automatic
leveling even while parked.

Powerful but quiet and emission-free electric motor.

Much less hassle with bothersome and costly maintenance such as oil changes,
tune-ups, etc.

No dangerous gas tank taking up space.

Only a few maintenance-free lifetime environmentally benign
super-capacitors/batteries.

Heavy pressurized tubular frame and basalt/carbon fiber foam body for
increased safety.

And, above all, never requires refueling nor electricity recharging.

(Gary C. Vesperman, Henderson, Nevada)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Vesperman" <vman@...>
To: <Strategic_Plan@...>; <carl.wiggins@...>;
<Bob.Emond@...>; <Bill.Kennedy@...>
Cc: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>; "Patrick Bailey"
<ine@...>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 12:01 AM
Subject: My comment to be included in DOE's Strategic Plan

Please include the following comment in the public record
for the DOE's Strategic Plan:

Since 1993 I have been following the development of new
sources of energy whose origins in general lie outside the mostly
uncreative mainstream science bureacracies of academia, government
and large corporations. The remainder of my comment is an
excerpt of a compilation of advanced technologies I have written
and occasionally revised the past couple of years. I believe that
the energy inventions herein described should be included in the
DOE's Strategic Plan for honest evaluation and possibly vigorous
commercialization.

Gary C. Vesperman
3123 Trueno Road
Henderson, NV 89014-3142
(702)  435-7947
vman@...


Introduction

I used to be associated with a resort complex to be built on a large tract
of raw land which is located outside the United States. This project
presented a rare opportunity to incorporate on a large scale current
thinking and ideas prevailing among experts in urban planning, ecological
sustainability, wildlife habitat preservation, etc. The project also
provided an opportunity and the freedom to utilize advanced technologies
which may lie outside the generally accepted theoretical constraints of
mainstream science. The resort ended up being built by other people on an
adjacent property. The exercise still was somewhat fruitful in stimulating
some fresh ideas.

For the past few years, I have been accumulating knowledge of futuristic
technologies not commonly known among mainstream scientists. I have
personally had the pleasure to know some of the top scientists and inventors
involved with what has been referred to as a mostly unpublicized
international "underground" science research network. Disregarding the
scientific dogma taught by academia, these people have chosen to follow
their own independent paths of scientific discovery to whatever they feel
the genuine scientific truth may be.

I have selected several advanced technologies which seem to be usable for
the foreign resort project. Their selection was based on their being
available for purchase and are definitely past the research and development
stage. Implementation of most of these technologies could occur anytime
before, during or after the construction phase of the project. However, it
should be noted that the electric station car technologies ought to be
adopted as soon as possible as they happen to substantially impact
architectural design and construction. The electrical power infrastructure
could also be affected by adopting one or more small-scaled electrical
generation technologies. Retrofitting at a later date could be costly.

I also have selected a few advanced technologies which are still under
development but may have potential applications for the resort project.

Please be warned that investments and purchases in any of these advanced
technologies should proceed only after a thorough and cautious exercise in
due diligence. Yet their inventors usually do deserve respect and fairness.
In most cases, I can not personally take responsibility for the accuracy and
validity of my descriptions; I am only editing other people's reports.

The literature on the devices which involve extracting energy from
radioactive substances, the ether, hydrogen, etc. contains anecdotes of
strangely behaving devices and explosions and, in some cases, of bodily
injury and even death!

WARNING!

Before experimenting with such devices, protect yourself from harm! Please
try to be well-informed of other experimenters' experience with these
strange devices and beware of danger.


Davis Tidal Turbine

The worldwide electrical energy market has been estimated at $800 billion
(US) per year and rising. "There are 2 billion people who still lack
electricity today, and the world demand in developing countries is doubling
every eight years." (World Watch Institute, May 1997)

The Institute for New Energy maintains a database of 127 new energy
production devices which includes a list based on commercialization criteria
ranging from 0 (found to be lies) to 10 (proven prototype - ready for
commercialization). (I know of several such devices that don't appear to be
included in their database.) The Davis tidal turbine, invented by Canadian
aerospace engineer Barry Davis, is one of only two new energy devices which
have earned a ranking of 10. His company, Blue Energy Canada, Inc., owns one
patent and has filed additional patent applications.

The Davis tidal turbine captures the power of ocean currents and tides to
generate electric current in a module fitted with slowly rotating
hydrofoils. The module does not emit gas of any kind, nor do the hydrofoils
offer any threat to marine organisms swimming through them. With fixed rotor
blades mounted in durable marine concrete caissons, the Davis tidal turbine'
s mechanical simplicity is profound. The basic concept is the multiple
vertical-axis hydro turbine. They are large marine structures of reinforced
concrete and steel that provide the necessary economies of scale. They
generally can be installed in areas with a tidal regime of about 1 meter or
more, or where velocities exceed about 2 meters per second. Standardized
tidal turbine modules can be grouped to meet any site application from ocean
to river in sizes that range from 7.5 megawatts to 15 megawatts for ocean
use, and 5 kilowatts to 500 kilowatts for river use.

The Davis tidal turbine is a low-cost, eco-benign energy alternative. Fueled
by the free forces of rivers and ocean tides and currents, tidal power can
provide a significant amount of the world's energy needs. Energy costs with
the Davis tidal turbine will be around $0.06/kilowatt-hour and eventually
should drop to $0.035/kilowatt-hour for tidal fences in the 1000-megawatt
range. Power outputs from the larger units can be accurately predicted to
within 2 per cent accuracy.

In many instances, tidal fences can double up with transportation corridors,
providing dual infrastructure use with essentially single infrastructure
cost. Coupled with existing grid prices and mounting social and
environmental costs associated with conventional power generation (health
care, climate change, etc.) tidal power is an outstanding and sustainable
energy choice. Remote sites can also produce hydrogen, hydrogen peroxide,
methane and other valuable energy intensive products for widespread
distribution, as well as provide irrigation and desalination facilities.

Tidal energy sites in the world's oceans can provide a significant, viable
and cost-effective source of reliable, inexhaustible energy. Many are
strategically located close to populated areas where they can be
economically harnessed using an ecologically benign, low-head technology.
For example, British Columbia may have up to 50,000 megawatts of potential
tidal power resource.

The Philippines Presidential Office had announced on December 20, 1997 a
$136,000,000 (US) order for a pilot tidal power generation facility which is
likely to be in the Hinatuan Passage area just north of Mindanao. Its
average power output will be 30 megawatts, and its peak power will be 55
megawatts. The pilot project is performance-coupled to the future
development rights of a 1000-megawatt commercial project. The Philippines
hope to become energy exporters.


Electric Station Cars

The Las Vegas Chapter of the Electric Auto Association appears to be one of
the association's stronger chapters. I have attended over 80 per cent of
their monthly meetings for the past several years. I myself have written an
Advanced Self-Powered Electric Vehicle concept (see end of this paper). The
"super car" concept is a proposal for combining advanced technologies I have
collected over the past few years into a futuristic self-powered electric
car superior to conventional cars.

On November 20, 1997, at their November meeting, Martin J. Bernard III,
Ph.D., Executive Director of the National Station Car Association, spoke on
"Station Car Potential in Las Vegas". Of all the meetings I have attended,
his talk was the most practical application of electric vehicles I have
heard. Because I could see an obvious application of the station car concept
to the foreign resort project, I thought I would list a few key points for
further discussion:

Many pages of additional information and diagrams concerning electric
station cars are available on the National Station Car Association's Web
site (www.stncar.com). The Web site includes a photograph which shows some
of the 40 electric station cars currently being used in conjunction with the
Bay Area Transit District in the San Francisco Bay Area. There are a total
of 60 other station cars in several other cities around the United States.

The resort project as presently planned probably allows for lots of parking
space for gasoline-powered cars, gas stations, auto repair facilities, etc.
Because the project is still in the planning stages, there is a high
probability that it can be easily converted to emphasis on electric station
cars. Only three simple changes would have to be made to the plans:

A substantial reduction in paved parking space in exchange for a substantial
increase in landscaping and preserved wildlife habitat. (I think Martin said
up to 90 per cent reduction.)

Reductions in gasoline refueling stations and auto repair facilities.

Installation of electric vehicle charging stations in the remaining parking
lots.

In return, the resort would gain the following benefits:

A more pleasant environment in the immediate vicinity of the resort's
buildings, featuring silence (except noise from an occasional diesel or
gasoline-powered truck), less dust and particles from vehicle exhaust, and
zero runoff from oil dripping on pavement.

More efficient use of the small country's electric power plants which
otherwise can not be operated as efficiently in a small market as compared
to huge markets such as the United States. When I looked up the country's
power information on the Internet, I noticed that a new coal-fired power
plant enters operation in mid-1999. It happens to be impractical to reduce
power output in a coal plant during the middle of the night.

Lower vehicular operating costs.

Less pavement, more landscaping, and increased preservation of the resort's
natural features and greenery.

Electric station cars are not owned by the drivers. Instead they are owned
by an operator such as a municipality or transportation authority. They are
intended for use at places featuring frequent usage and regular access such
as train stations, airports, hotels, convention halls, and downtown areas.

A driver who has previously bought a smart card (similar to a credit card)
swipes the card through a card reader which allows him access to the station
car. He or she then unplugs the car from the charger, drives off, and leaves
it either at the same charging station or a different charging station,
which is then available for the next driver to drive. Arrangements can be
made to leave it at home overnight providing it is driven again the
following morning.

The cars are manufactured in Norway by a family-owned plastic manufacturer.
The car body is a simple lightweight one-piece plastic shell framed with
extruded rods made of recycled aluminum. It is surprisingly sturdy and can
carry two passengers. The pack of nickel-cadmium batteries is hung
underneath the body and range up to 65 miles.

It is reasonable to anticipate that a variety of sizes and improved models
of electric vehicles will become available in a few short years. For
instance, on October 23, 1997, a pre-production Sunrise prototype built by
Solectria Corporation, Wilmington, Massachusetts, was driven from Boston to
New York City on a single charge of its Ovonic nickel/metal-hydride battery
with enough electricity left over to drive an additional 66 kilometers to
Atlantic City for a total range of 405 kilometers (IEEE Spectrum December
1997). Power Technology, Inc., has a brand new battery, compared to
lead-acid batteries, that is 30 per cent to 50 per cent lighter, insensitive
to temperature, long-lived, cheaper, environmentally friendly, quickly
rechargeable, and quadruples the range.

Blacklight Power, Inc., is developing a battery which weighs only 10
kilograms but can supply 150 horsepower for 1,000 miles. Blacklight
compresses hydrogen atoms into lower-energy-state hydrogen atoms called
"hydrinos". When the hydrinos are formed, energy is released which is
considerably more than the energy from chemical reactions but less than from
nuclear reactions. (See Blacklight Power's impressive Web site
http://www.blacklightpower.com .)

Each car is equipped with a commercially available electronic tracking
device. The San Francisco Bay Area is ringed with 15 transmitting towers.
Each car can be located with an accuracy of 4 feet in case it is stolen.

At each station, a driver returning a car is responsible for cleaning the
car and plugging the car into a battery charger before leaving it.


POWR/MASTR (trademark) Industrial Engine

The commercially available POWR/MASTR (trademark) is a high-efficiency,
long-life industrial engine which is fueled by natural gas, propane or
butane. A POWR/MASTR (trademark) can be directly connected to gas company
pipelines and so never needs refueling. Each POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit can
generate over 145 horsepower for mechanical power needs, or 100 kilowatts of
electricity for electric power needs. POWR/MASTR (trademark) units can be
linked together in parallel and/or linked to utility company electricity to
satisfy energy requirements of any size.

POWR/MASTR (trademark) offers savings of up to 50 per cent over other
mechanical power costs, or up to 70 per cent over utility company charges
for electricity. A San Diego shopping center saves $125,000 per year in
electricity costs.

POWR/MASTR (trademark) is environmentally friendly, using only clean burning
gases at a maximum rate of 9 therms/900,000 Btu/900 cubic feet per hour of
natural gas. When less power is needed than 100 kilowatts or 145 horsepower,
POWR/MASTR (trademark) automatically self-adjusts to use less fuel.
Operating at less than a quiet 60 dB at 20 feet, POWR/MASTR (trademark)
sounds no louder than a new car engine at idle. It also produces far less
harmful exhaust emissions than a typical gasoline-fueled automotive engine.
POWR/MASTR (trademark) is fully automated and designed for 60 months of
continuous use with maintenance regularly scheduled every 1,500 hours.

Each POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit weighs 3,200 lb., and its size is 8 feet
long by 5 feet wide by 6 feet high. A POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit can be
transported on its own delivery trailer and installed by one person in about
four hours after site preparation. No cranes, work crews, nor special
foundations are necessary. An adjustable level platform system is built-in
so that no poured nor perfectly level pad is required. Controls are included
at no charge to allow more than one POWR/MASTR (trademark) unit to deliver
electricity with other power generation units or in conjunction with utility
company power.


Hydrosonic Pump

The hydrosonic pump seems destined to become a billion-dollar invention with
many applications. It is really a zero-pressure boiler, not a pump. The
inventor has been calling it a pump so as to avoid tangling up with strict
American Society of Mechanical Engineers boiler codes.

Mechanical input power rotates the shaft, and plain water is converted to
steam without the need for hot surfaces. The process seems to be actually a
form of fusion where collapsing microscopic bubbles momentarily create
extremely high pressures and temperatures. The technical term for this
phenomenon is "sono-luminescence". The energy conversion efficiency is
around 130 per cent. (To prevent confusion, it should be clearly understood
that the hydrosonic pump on the macro scale does NOT operate at high
temperatures and pressures as is the case with nuclear or fossil-fueled
boilers.)

One application is to use a windmill to turn the shaft. Out of the nozzle
comes steam which drives a steam turbine to produce electricity. The steam
then enters a condenser from which can be obtained potable water and hot
water for space heating. For remote islands, for example, the hydrosonic
pump would be very useful. One utility is reportedly already looking at
increasing the efficiencies of its nuclear and fossil-fueled power plants by
3 - 5 percentage points.

Nevada has large underground reservoirs of useless mineralized water. The
hydrosonic pump could be the centerpiece of a large-scale scheme to generate
electricity, heat and potable water.

The hydrosonic pump is actually being commercially manufactured and sold.
The inventor definitely is using the correct approach in that since the pump
is such a new technology, for some time he has been simply building one unit
at a time in various sizes and configurations. He has been purposely
restricting their sale to local installations so he can closely monitor
their performance and incorporate improvements and changes into future
units.

As of May 1996, he had 14 units actually installed and operating. One
application is for producing clean steam on demand for a commercial laundry.
Based on feedback from customers' experience with them, he is evolving
step-by-step in an organized manner towards eventual mass production of
fully validated units. It seems to be much easier to obtain expansion
capital for actual commercial units than "laboratory queens".


Pulsed Abnormal Glow Discharge Reactor

A typical flashlight's light bulb is a glass vacuum tube where the
flashlight's batteries force current through the bulb's filament, resulting
in a power loss equal to the square of the current times the positive
resistance of the filament. The power is then radiated out of the light bulb
as light and heat.

Physicists have known for many years that the pulsed abnormal glow of a
discharge tube has a negative resistance characteristic. What physicists
have not appreciated, until the development of the PAGD reactor, was the
real possibility or the knowledge of precisely how to go about extracting
'free' energy by exciting self-sustaining oscillations in the plasma
discharge.

The pulsed abnormal glow discharge (PAGD) reactor (U.S. Patents 5,416,391,
5,449,989, and 5,502,354) is an over-sized glass vacuum tube which is
constructed and electrically driven within a narrow range of DC voltage so
that it operates with negative resistance. Because of the reactor's negative
resistance, other components with positive resistance such as light bulbs,
batteries, and motors can be inserted in the circuit without drawing energy
from the DC power source, up to the reactor's maximum amount of negative
resistance.

The PAGD reactor's function is based upon heretofore unknown spontaneous
emission properties of certain metals in vacuum and involves an anomalous
cathode reaction force. The reactor may be conceived of as a portable vacuum
battery made active only when needed.

The technology employs cold-cathode vacuum discharge plasma reactors to set
up self-exciting oscillations, in the form of pulsed abnormal glow
discharges triggered by auto-electronic emissions, in order to produce
power. The circuit is driven from a direct current source of impedance
sufficient to prevent establishment of a sustained vacuum arc discharge. In
combination with a special circuit, electrical power, in excess of the input
power needed for operation, can be extracted. The system, therefore, may
also be referred to as an over-unity system where net energy output greatly
exceeds net energy input.

The experimental data show numerous tests involving the discharge of a
source bank of 12-volt cells as the powered apparatus recharges an output
bank of cells and/or runs an electric motor. In one typical test run, within
20 minutes, 0.988 kilowatt-hour of energy is generated for an input of 0.258
kilowatt-hours. Power conversion gain performance efficiencies are clearly
shown in the figures by data plots on a scale that runs to 1000 per cent.
One power conversion gain efficiency cited was 483 per cent.

It seems that the PAGD reactor's inventors have conquered the problem of
electrode over-heating after long duration running of many devices built
using different electrode configurations, shapes and materials. The PAGD
reactor's development is now at the point where predictably 40
megawatt-hours of energy can be delivered from something of light-weight
construction that one can hold in one hand.

Imagine holding something that can deliver 2 kilowatts of electrical power
output and keep going for 20,000 hours. Then ask yourself when we can expect
to see self-powered electrical vehicles on our roads using somewhat larger
versions of those tubes.

Unlike the chemically-assisted nuclear reaction process, which outputs
low-grade heat, the PAGD reactor directly generates electricity at power
voltage levels, without any utilization of cold or thermonuclear fusion
principles. Another important feature of the apparatus is that it employs no
radioactive compounds and generates no nuclear radiation or radioisotopes.
The energy system is entirely pollution-free, self-contained and composed of
readily recyclable materials. Storage of the power produced may be carried
out by traditional means, be these mechanical or electrical.

At least three patents have so far been issued. One of the patents involves
an associated motor drive which provides for direct electromechanical
transformation of the energy accumulated within the reactor. Additional
patents covering various aspects and applications of the PAGD reactor are
being sought.

Energy conversion system applications for electric vehicles, stand-alone
power supplies and autonomous housing are currently under development. The
inventors hope that by making vehicles self-sufficient in terms of energy,
the PAGD reactor will offer the possibility of bypassing massive
infrastructure expansions in order to make the electric vehicle a feasible
reality while solving the problem of range which currently detracts from its
appeal. Other potential applications include pulsed lasers, inverters,
transformer and motor circuits. The inventors are presently engaged in
negotiating licensing agreements with a view to development of the
applications.


Testatika Free Energy Machine

The Testatika free energy machine was developed over a 20-year research
period in Switzerland. It resembles a Wimshurst electrostatic generator
commonly seen in high school physics labs. Other documents may refer to it
as the "Swiss M-L converter" or "Thesta-Distatica." The inventor of this
superb machine, Paul Baumann, claims its running principle was found by
studying the effects of lightning.

Testatika not only runs on its own energy but produces also a huge amount of
excess power. A video shows a demonstrator unit producing at least 3
kilowatts of power. Yet the machine is only about 70 cm wide, 40 cm deep,
and about 60 cm tall. It delivers DC voltage ranging from 270 to 320 volts,
only depending on the dryness of the air. At this voltage it can supply at
least 10 amperes of DC current.

Testatika is not a perpetuum mobile, but an energy machine that collects its
"free" energy from the charged and ionized air particles. Some technological
tricks are implemented to overcome the normal drag-resistance of a
conventional Wimshurst machine, which is still the secret of the Swiss
group. However, progress is being made by several researchers in the
underground science network in deducing and explaining the basic mechanisms
of this remarkable machine.

The initial high voltage, at high frequency, is produced by twin
counter-revolving electrostatic disks made from magnetic stainless steel.
The magnetic disk segments provide an electromagnetic speed control for the
disks, while functioning as electrostatic elements to provide the very high
voltage.

The solid-state amplification subsystem consists of polarized sections of
barium-iron permanent magnets with multiple coil arrays, as first introduced
by Hans Coler in Germany during the 1940's. This subsystem increases the
amperage level about 20 times from the 150 watts from the twin electrostatic
disks up to about 3000 watts at the output terminals.

An independent feedback subsystem provides the electromagnetic force to
power a small DC motor to revolve the twin electrostatic disks continuously.
This arrangement consists of two horseshoe magnets with coil sets wound
fully around each magnet leg. This feedback method provides that the
Testatika free-energy machine is a fully standalone system, with no external
power input. Once the two disks are turned by hand, they continue to revolve
on their own, producing free energy.

The Testatika machines (some smaller units also exist which only deliver
about 200-300 watts) are not yet mass-production type models. They are still
laboratory prototype units, although they are built with a very good
craftsmanship. No maintenance is required with these units.

Besides powering a Swiss commune of 3,000 people, at least four Testatika
free energy machines are reportedly in operation in Palm Springs,
California, Canada, Florida, and another western state. The parts and
materials for one powerful enough to electrify a house are estimated to cost
about $2,000. Two commercial sizes reportedly have been developed. The
smaller unit weighs about 50 pounds and generates 4 to 5 kilowatts. The
larger unit has two disks 3 meters in diameter rotating at 12,000 RPM and
generates 30 kilowatts.


GeoExchange Heat Pump

A refrigerator is a one-way heat pump that cools the inside of the box by
removing heat, which is then pumped someplace else. Cold air is not pumped
into refrigerators.

Conventional air conditioners pump hot air from the inside of a home into
the outside air. Because the outside air is already so hot in the summer,
the difficulty of pumping hot air into air that is already hot results in
low efficiency and high energy costs.

GeoExchange Heat Pumps are electrically-powered devices that use the natural
heat storage ability of the earth or the earth's ground water to heat and
cool a structure. They are being promoted by the Geothermal Heat Pump
Consortium which claims that they can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40
per cent or more over traditional air conditioners.

At the Bella Vivente subdivision of Lake Las Vegas, Henderson, Nevada, their
GeoExchange system pumps heat into and out of homes with one loop of pipe
which is connected to the lake.  Residents save an average of $150 per month
in heating and air conditioning bills. Other advantages include eliminating
noisy and unattractive outdoor condensers and cooling towers.


Hydro-Magnetic Dynamo

Russian inventor Oleg V. Gritskevitch's performance CLAIMS for his
"hydro-magnetic dynamo" are as follows:

Dynamos are scaleable from 100 kilowatts to 1,000 megawatts. Dynamos can be
built as big as
1,000 megawatts. Seven such dynamos can be stacked on top of one another to
make a single 7,000-megawatt unit about the size of a two-car garage. For
comparison, Hoover Dam's 17 generators have a total rated capacity of 2,000
megawatts.

A dynamo can reliably run continuously for 25 years or more with little or
no maintenance, no external fuel source, and no pollution. If a dynamo's
output is 1,000 kilowatts, its total input power is approximately 10
kilowatts. So the dynamo's energy efficiency is 10,000 per cent, or 100 to
1.

The source of the dynamo's massive electrical output is a nuclear reaction
which is not generally known to mainstream science. However, it is known
that the dynamo produces alpha particles which are helium nuclei made from
fused deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen with one proton and one neutron. The
electrons missing from the helium nuclei are what seem to provide a copious
"sink" of electricity, and which happens to be the source of the dynamo's
ability to generate an exceptionally large amount of electricity. It is also
known that the dynamo uses high-density charge clusters. High-density charge
clusters are the basis of plasma-injected transmutation of elements and
low-voltage nuclear transmutation of radioactive materials.

There were three dynamo prototypes built. The first two small experimental
prototypes were built in Vladivostok. The third and last prototype generated
electricity off and on from 1992 to January 1997 in Armenia. (It was sadly
destroyed during an armed rebellion by local religious fanatics unhappy with
the Armenian government.) It generated a constant current of 6,800 amperes
at 220 volts DC. That multiplies out to nearly 1.5 megawatts. In the winter
when lower temperatures allowed more efficient cooling, the power output was
increased to 2.5 megawatts. The Armenian prototype dynamo's toroid weighed
900 kilograms and had a diameter of approximately 2 meters.

Cooling water is circulated through copper pipes wrapped around the toroid.
The heat is expelled from the cooling water with a heat exchanger.

After a dynamo is assembled in a factory, the water is literally
jump-started (by discharging a large bank of capacitors) to moving around
the toroid. The dynamo's controls are temporarily set to generating enough
of a modest amount of electricity to sustain itself, even while being
transported from the factory to its site. For the Armenian prototype dynamo,
two10-farad capacitor banks (from Russian military radar stations) were used
to provide the initial water motion (acceleration and excitation of water).
Using a total of 20,000 joules, 100,000 volts with 0.05 amperes of current
were applied to the Armenian dynamo for 3 - 5 minutes for starting its
generation of electricity.

After these Russian radar capacitors were used to jump-start the Armenian
prototype dynamo, a bank of buffer batteries sustained continuous operation
when water motion and ionizing occurs. This battery bank contained 8
powerful 12-volt, 150-ampere lead batteries. The Armenian dynamo's
sustaining input power was 14,400 watts. (For comparision, in winter, the
Armenian dynamo's output power was 2,500,000 watts.) Once, the output
current was accidentally increased to 40,000 amperes for almost a minute.
Fortunately, the power was reduced to a safe level before the water started
to boil. Internal coils (windings) control water velocity and therefore
dynamo power.

The dynamo's production cost is estimated at $500 per kilowatt which is
competitive to nuclear power's capital costs of $5,000 per kilowatt,
windmill capital costs of $4,000 per kilowatt, etc. A well-run nuclear power
plant can generate power for 1.5 cents per kilowatt-hour, coal 1.8 cents,
natural gas 3.4 cents, and oil 4.1 cents, on the average. The dynamo's
operating cost would be approximately .1 cent per kilowatt-hour with no
external fuel needed nor pollution.

Dynamos could replace all nuclear power plants, solar installations,
wood-buring furnaces, hydro-electric dams, windmills, fossil-fueled power
plants, etc. Satellites, locomotives, heavy trucks, airplanes, and ships are
obvious applications. It does not seem that dynamos can be made compact
enough to power electric cars although it certainly would be worth trying.

A Forbes article states that PECO (formerly Philadelphia Electric Company),
with an income stream to back it up, was able to sell on Wall Street $4
billion worth of bonds paying 5.8 per cent. A dynamo manufacturer could
simply sell bonds to build and operate dynamos at a low interest rate.
Dynamo loan payback times may be in the ball park of a half-year to a year,
depending on the local electricity market price.  As soon as a dynamo is
paid for, the revenue from that time on would be almost pure profit. Once a
track record is established by successfully installing a few dynamos, the
dynamo company could raise money to build more dynamos by simply selling
billions of dollars of bonds instead of stock. So therefore, there wouldn't
be any dilution of ownership.

A recent IEEE Spectrum article stated that world demand for electricity
increases approximately 500 megawatts every day. To put this in perspective,
the equivalent of another Hoover Dam would have to be built every four days
to keep up with world electricity increase demands. Or, a dynamo
manufacturing company would have to build another 500-megawatt dynamo every
single day to keep up with world electricity increase demand in addition to
replacing all existing generators fueled by hydro, nuclear, and fossil
fuels.

The following is a translation, with slight editing for increased clarity,
of the "Description" of the dynamo's Russian patent. The numbers in the
"Description" refer to the patent's drawing which is attached to this email.
Note that while the drawing shows 4 electrodes, the dynamo actually uses 32
electrodes.

The Description
IPC  H 02 K 44/00
Method of deriving of electrical energy and organization of Gritskevich's
MHD-generator for its realization

This invention is regarding a new source of energy, i.e., about deriving an
electric power by using MHD-generators.

The method of deriving of energy [1] (in particular thermal) by means of
organization of movement of water in certain direction inside a closed loop
is already known. The given method uses unique properties of water which
cause a release of energy as an outcome of a rupture of hydrogen
connections. Along with a thermal, an outcome of electrical energy occurs.
However, the given method does not allow to receive electrical energy in a
suitable for use kind. In a similar method [2] (with not only usage of water
but with any polar liquid as a substitute) a proof of outcome of additional
liquid energy occurs and it's just on the part of the process of a cold
nuclear fusion and cavitational processes. The given method isn't intended
for deriving electrical energy as well.

An organization and method of deriving of electrical energy [3, 4] are known
by means of organization of movement of ferromagnetic spheroids in certain
direction inside closed channel when the voltage, obtained as a result of an
electromagnetic induction, was used with the help of electromagnetic
windings. The device realizing this method contains tightly closed
(hermetically sealed) toroid-style channel, in which a conducting media and
electromagnetic system with windings have been placed (as ferromagnetic
spheroids). The device and the method have low efficiency, are rather
complicated and have low reliability.

An organization and method of deriving of electrical energy [5, 6] are
known, and were chosen to be a prototype, by means of organization of
movement of a conducting media in certain direction inside closed channel,
in the case when obtained electrical energy is used by electromagnetic
windings. Ionized gas is used as a conducting media. The device that
accomplishes the realization of this method (the MHD generator) contains a
closed (sealed) toroid-style channel whose body is made from a non-magnetic
material, whose inside part is covered by dielectric material, and
electromagnetic system with windings as well. Both the organization and
method have low efficiency, are rather complicated and have low reliability.
In addition, this (known) method is not ecologically safe.

Ultimate purposes (goals) of prospective engineering solutions are the
following: increasing of efficiency, reliability and ecological safety, and
simplification of a construction of the  MHD generator as well.

The indicated goals can be achieved as follows.

In the known (mentioned before) method of deriving of electrical energy by
means of organization (controlling) of movement of a conducting media in
certain direction inside a closed  (sealed) loop when the electrical energy
is derived by electromagnetic windings, new point is the fact that a polar
liquid is used as a media, which liquid gets ionized and actuated even at
the start-up time by a running magnetic field with the help of stimulating
electromagnetic windings, and the movement of a media is organized
(controlled) inside a tightly sealed channel (circuit) whose internal walls'
factor of a dielectric permeability is greater than the polar liquid's one .

The liquid can be ionized by a high-voltage discharges or with the help of
disk made from a non-magnetic material, who is gyrating inside the channel
with a liquid.

Liquid's movement can be stabilized with the help of tight hermetically
sealed chamber, filled-in with a polar liquid. And the chamber has
electromagnetic windings and it is connected to the channel.

If a water is being used as a liquid, it can be preliminary activated by
adding heavy water.

In the known (mentioned before) device of the MHD-generator containing a
closed toroid-style channel with a body made from a non-magnetic material,
whose inside part is covered with a dielectric material, and electromagnetic
system with windings as well, a new point is the fact that the channel is
built tight (hermetically sealed) and is filled in with a polar liquid,
where the factor of the dielectric permeability of the covering material is
greater than the liquid's one.

A water can be used as a liquid, containing heavy water as an option.

The MHD-generator can contain a tight (hermetically sealed) stabilization
chamber, having  a junction with the channel, placed outside of it in the
internal area of a toroid. In this case the chamber can be built as a
cylinder, whose axis lies in the plane of a middle axis of the toroid-style
channel.

MHD-generator can contain a device for ionization of the liquid, which
device can be built either as electrodes (placed inside the channel and
joined with a source of high-voltage periodic voltage), or either as a disk
made from a non-magnetic material (placed the same way inside the channel
and kinematically joined with the drive of rotary movement).

The electromagnetic system can contain force (power) windings and windings
of stimulation which can be physically placed inside the channel.

A segnetoelectrical material can be used as a cover of walls of the channel.

These inventions are explained (accompanied) by drawings (figures), where on
dr.1 (fig.1) the general view of the generator as shown, and on dr.2 (fig.2)
the transversal slit (section, cut) is shown.

The invention is explained on the example of hydro-magnetic dynamo of
Gritskevich (OGRI).

The dynamo contains hollow toroid-style body 1 of a cermet (metal +
ceramics), whose internal surface is covered with a synergetical stratum
(layer) 2, and the concavity is filled in with a pure (distilled) water 3
with added heavy water in it. In the body's channel 1 electrodes 4 (made
from a hard-alloy material) are placed, connected to a power supply, and
also stimulation windings 5 connected to the power supply are placed. Inside
the body's ring 1 a cylindrical stabilization chamber 6 (made from a cermet)
connected with the body's channel 1 is mounted. The internal surface of the
chamber 6 is covered with a synergetical stratum (layer) 7 as well, and the
concavity is filled in with pure (distilled) water 8 with added heavy water
in it. The body 1 and the chamber 6 have force (power) windings 9 and 10 at
the outside.

Hydro-magnetic dynamo works the following way. The partially pre-ionized (on
the part of the heavy water) water 3 gets ionized further by the
high-voltage discharges by electrodes 4. With the help of windings 6 a
running magnetic field is being created, which field creates movement of
water 3 in one direction inside the body's channel 1. An electromotive force
gets created by the electromagnetic induction in windings 9. During the
movement of the water stream free electrons get created, and an additional
energy gets emitted because of water's friction (viscosity) 3 against the
stratum (layer) 2, and because of electrostatic breakdowns of
cavitatal-vacuum structures and of the ongoing reaction of the cold nuclear
fusion. In this case the energy's (power's) volume received in the windings
9 can be greater than the energy's volume wasted for liquid's ionization and
start-up by the electrodes 4 and windings 5. Moreover, the presented
organization and method do not conflict with the energy conservation law.
Because the redundant energy (in relation to brought-up energy) gets emitted
from the water 3 and from the internal stratums (layers) 2 as well, which
are due for replacement after certain interval of usage. The stabilization
of the liquid's movement 3 gets created during the interaction (-e) of
charges in it with other charges in the chamber 6. The electric power from
windings 10 also can be used.

Information sources:

1. Application ??? WO 90/00526, 1990.
2. Patent RU No2124681, 1999.
3. Copyright certificate USSR No753372, 1980.
4. Patent  USA No3496781, 1967.
5. Patent RU No2071163, 1996.
6. Application RU No95110712, 1997.


High-Temperature Incinerator

This simple process reportedly incinerates garbage, sawdust, and wood chips
at such an unbelievably high temperature that even thermocouples at 3200
degrees burn up. So little odor and smoke is produced that a prototype was
tested indoors. Very little waste is left behind which needs to be trucked
away. The high-grade heat from this type of incinerator can be used for
generating electricity and producing process heat.


Small-Scaled Energy Production

Large-scaled centralized electrical generation facilities typically require
costly fuel, pollute, use up large areas of land for generators and power
lines, are unsafe in the case of nuclear, have limited operating lifetimes
of a few decades, and inherently subject large regions to blackouts. The
country where the resort complex is to be located currently is expanding its
electricity generating capacity by building large-scaled fossil-fueled power
plants.

Small-scaled decentralized electrical generating units ideally do not
require any costly fuel, do not pollute, only require a square meter or two
of floor space, are standalone and do not interlock with a power grid, and
are dependable.

What are referred to as "renewable" energy sources are receiving much
attention and R and D support. They include producing and using hydrogen as
a fuel, fuel cells, solar, and wind. Some types are already in use such as
windmills, solar water heaters, and solar box ovens for cooking. (I myself
own and use a solar box oven with excellent results, particularly with
baking delicious potatoes.) While the intent is laudable and much clever
engineering has been accomplished, solar and wind, for example, are
inherently not completely satisfactory sources of energy.

The international underground science research network seems to focus mostly
on developing unconventional new sources of energy. The basis of many of
their devices is extracting energy in some fashion from the ether.

The hydrosonic pump (see above) is a rare example of an unconventional new
source of energy which is actually being commercially manufactured and sold.
The pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor is one of many examples of
unconventional new sources of energy that, to my knowledge, are not
currently being commercialized.

The country's people may be interested in starting up a massive new industry
specializing in researching and commercializing new sources of energy,
particularly etheric energy. They could follow a path similar to Taiwan
becoming a strong computer manufacturer, for example, even though Taiwan is
merely an out-of-the-way island.

Since such an organization is a new concept with me, what follows are some
thoughts I have come up with:

Our first task should be to try to define somewhat just what is it the new
organization is supposed to research and commercialize. The mission of Ether
and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., (which seems as good a name as any
other) would be to take advantage of this small country's freedom from
scientific dogma and pioneering entrepreneurial spirit in researching and
commercializing applications of etheric energy, the existence of which is
pooh-poohed by practically all physicists.

The potential applications of etheric energy are diverse. Major categories I
can think of are:

Over-unity gain energy conversion by rotating magnets and electronic
circuits

Plasma-injected transmutation for radioactivity amelioration, thermal energy
production,
and manufacture of scarce elements out of more plentiful elements

High-density charge clusters

Radiovoltaic, petrovoltaic, and super-capacitor batteries

Self-powered electric vehicles

Niches in agricultural technology

Medical treatment devices

Self-powered heating, air conditioning, and ventilation equipment

Stand-alone power supplies for appliances, office equipment, instruments,
etc.

Anti-gravity

Etheric weather engineering

Shape power

Space flight

Archaeology

Machine tools

Electrical power generation

Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., should establish a close
relationship with the local university's engineering departments for two
reasons:  One would be to build up, organize, and document the theoretical
underpinnings of ether engineering. The other would be to train and inspire
young engineers in the exciting new field of ether engineering.

There was a similar situation during the 1950's and 1960's where Stanford
University's electrical engineering faculty helped start the computer and
semiconductor companies of the now fabulously successful Silicon Valley. I
see a similarly wealthy "Ether Valley" starting up in the country's capital
city. It could be a sound business decision for several reasons:

The country could get rid of its coal-fired power plants.

The country could ensure its long-term financial and energy survival by
commercializing new sources of energy and other applications of etheric
energy while its primary electrical energy generation and distribution
business gradually disappears.

Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., could greatly enhance the
livability of employees, customers, friends, relatives, and shareholders who
live in the country by eliminating smog, reducing living costs, improving
health standards, controlling the weather, and removing unsightly power
lines and transformers.

PacifiCorp Holdings, Inc., an Oregon public utility holding company and the
third largest power utility west of the Mississippi River, has already set a
precedent by investing $1,000,000 in Blacklight Power, Inc., of Malvern,
Pennsylvania. Blacklight Power is developing an exotic new source of clean
energy from ordinary water. Either an electrolytic cell or gaseous potassium
ions in a vacuum compress hydrogen atoms into lower-energy-state hydrogen
atoms called "hydrinos". When the hydrinos are formed, energy is released
which in magnitude is between chemical and nuclear energy. Blacklight has
ambitious plans for retrofitting fossil-fueled and nuclear power plants.

Blacklight is developing a 100-kilowatt generator which can power a car
100,000 miles on a tank of water. Blacklight Power, Inc., also claims on its
Web site that it is developing a 10-kilogram battery which can supply 150
horsepower for 1,000 miles. Parked in a garage, it would seem that the car's
battery charger could feed electricity back into the electric power grid and
help pay for the car. Unfortunately, generators in homes and small
businesses pose a safety problem for power company workers who normally
assume the power is off from the central generating stations when there is a
blackout.

The price of Blacklight Power's stock in private offerings has increased
from $.75/share in 1991 to $1,500/share in 1996 (not publicly listed). A
recent stock offering sold $5,000,000 in one week and may close at
$10,000,000. Because energy is one of the world's largest industries,
Blacklight Power offers an example of how lucrative a validated new source
of energy can be.

As a public service, I would be happy to work part-time as an advisor to
Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc.

I am acquainted with many of the key scientists and inventors who have done
so much to create physical etheric devices as well as develop ether physics.
I think I can easily line up an advisory board of highly qualified technical
consultants.

There seems to be a high likelihood of productive ether engineering research
that could be accomplished for two or three more decades. The initial
emphasis of Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., should be to
commercialize an existing inventory of devices and technologies that are at
least close to being ready to market and to which Ether and Charge Cluster
Engineering, Inc., could acquire licenses and rights. It should be reminded
that commercialization of any inventions is contingent upon acquisition to
patents, licenses, rights, territories, application fields, etc.

I am certain that a modest amount of advertising in publications which cover
the ether and charge cluster engineering fields such as New Energy News,
Electrifying Times, Journal of New Energy, Exotic Research, Planetary
Association of Clean Energy, Space Energy Journal, Nexus, and Infinite
Energy - Cold Fusion and New Energy Technology would attract additional
inventors.

However, it is crucial that Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc.,
first establishes a reputation for being fair and responsible when
negotiating with inventors for the rights to their inventions. It is also
crucial that Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., recruits competent
staff not only for engineering and management, but also for evaluating the
reality and economic worth of ether-related inventions.

The human species has laboriously pulled an impressively diverse mix of new
energy technologies out of the dark hole of its ignorance. (I have counted
about 50 new sources of energy in this report.) Sometime in the future,
Ether and Charge Cluster Engineering, Inc., could conceivably find a
particular energy technology it has commercialized in competition with some
other energy technology. By simultaneously commercializing a variety of
ether-related energy technologies, I am confident that profitable niches in
the immense energy business as well as applications of etheric energy to
industries unrelated to energy production can be found for many years to
come.

What follows is a sampling of energy inventions - at least nearly all of
which could be candidates as small-scaled energy production units and, in
some cases, even as off-grid electricity generators. Please keep in mind
that some may require additional development and/or verification.


High-Density Charge Cluster Technology.

Nearly solid-state electrical energy converter (U.S. Patent 5,018,180) with
a stable over-unity power conversion gain of approximately 5. The gain can
be cranked up to a maximum of approximately 100 but then loses stability. A
fax sent August 1996 reported that it now "appears capable of providing 1
kilowatt of thermal energy plus 1 kilowatt of electrical output per cubic
inch with a power supply (small) and heat exchanger". The high-density
charge cluster device also offers ease of manufacture as well as
compactness. It is thought that this new technology is so fundamental that
ultimately 1,000 doctorate theses could be researched and written by
academia. For example, one university is researching flat-panel displays
based on high-density charge cluster technology. High-density charge cluster
technology appears to be a credible candidate for an advanced self-powered
electric vehicle's on-board battery charger.


Low-Energy Nuclear Transmutation - A Primer for Non-Physicists.

The physics of high-density charge cluster technology can be explained
somewhat by the following which was written primarily for non-scientists.
Low-energy nuclear transmutation is thought by some to be the basis for
these technologies mentioned elsewhere in this compilation of advanced
technologies:  pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor, cold fusion reactor
with thermal-to-electric conversion, fiber-based cold fusion power cell,
hybrid cold-fusion hydrogen reactor, and gas-phase catalytic fusion.

Atoms comprise of negatively charged electrons whirling around a relatively
small nucleus of neutrons and positively charged protons. Protons have a
mass 1836 times the mass of electrons. A neutron is a combination of an
electron and a proton with zero net electrostatic charge. An atom's number
of protons and its equal number of electrons determine its type of element.
Only when a positive ion (such as a proton or nucleus of a helium atom)
penetrates an atom's nucleus does the atomic nucleus become another element
(or another isotope of the same element) or becomes unstable and splits
(fissions) into two or more elements.

For decades, physicists have assumed that changing (transmuting) elements
always requires high energies. Elaborately expensive machinery was required
to accelerate a positively charged particle of less than atomic size to a
high enough energy to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of an atom's
nucleus and penetrate its interior.

The inaccurately named "cold fusion" is only one of several types of
physical phenomena which indicate the existence of a mechanism by which
elements could be changed to other elements without seemingly requiring very
high energies. However, the secret of cold fusion's excess heat had remained
a mystery until September 13, 1996 when Kenneth Shoulders explained how the
fracturing of palladium loaded with hydrogen (deuterons) could produce
high-density charge clusters and cause nuclear reactions. Based on this
evidence and on the pioneering work of Rod Neal and Stan Gleeson, a trio of
physicists, Hal Fox, Robert W. Bass, and Shang-Xian Jin, finally deduced a
more complete theory of the nature of the mechanism which extends beyond the
discovery of cold fusion. The magnitude of their fundamental scientific
discovery can best be appreciated by considering that Hal Fox's Fusion
Information Center, Inc., has collected over 3,000 papers on cold fusion
since its discovery in 1989 without anyone else being able to offer a
complete understanding of just how cold fusion works.

What follows is a simplified explanation of their remarkable concept using
an analogy of electrons as ping pong balls and protons as bowling balls.
Visualize a room with one wall as the positive plate connected to the
positive terminal of a battery, and the opposite wall as the negative plate
connected to the battery's negative terminal. Each ping pong ball is
negatively charged and when released at the negative wall, electrostatic
repulsion/attraction will cause the ping pong ball to fly across the room to
the positive wall. Each bowling ball is positively charged and when released
at the positive wall, it will roll slowly in the opposite direction across
the room to the negative wall.

Both the ping pong ball and the bowling ball have an equal but opposite
electrostatic charge. So therefore they both draw the same amount of
electrical energy from the battery as they fly or roll from one wall to the
opposite wall. But because the ping pong ball is so much lighter than the
bowling ball, the ping pong ball will strike the opposite wall at a much
greater speed than the bowling ball.

Now assume that 1,000,000 ping pong balls are released as a cluster at the
negative wall. (At a high enough density, electrons will forget their mutual
electrostatic repulsion and cluster in the same manner as ball lightning.
Mother Nature sometimes pulls weird tricks.) Embedded in the ping pong ball
cluster are 10 bowling balls. Because there are so many more negatively
charged ping pong balls, the positively charged bowling balls are going to
stick with the ping pong balls and ignore the attraction of the negative
wall and the repulsion of the positive wall. So therefore the bowling balls
hitch a free ride along with the ping pong balls. When the bowling balls hit
the positive wall along with the ping pong balls at the same speed as the
ping pong balls, the bowling balls will hit the positive wall with
enormously greater energies than if they had hit the negative wall, rolling
slowly alone, in the opposite direction.

In the same manner, protons (and other types of positive ions) in
"low-energy" nuclear reactions are hurled into the nucleus of atoms by their
"piggy-back" ride on high-density electron charge clusters with sufficient
energy to split or transmute atoms. This mechanism apparently is the secret
of cold fusion's excess heat, eliminating radioactivity, transmutation of
common elements into scarce elements, and powerful new atom smashers small
enough for college physics laboratories. If the new theory holds up to
scrutiny by other physicists, it might win a Nobel prize in physics.


Cold Fusion Reactor with Thermal-to-Electric Conversion.

These are small reactors similar to electrolytic cells which produce more
thermal energy than their electrical energy input. Power gains have
reportedly been measured as high as several hundred. When atoms are being
transmuted under specialized low-energy conditions, thermal energy is
released. The heat can be directly converted to electricity. The electricity
could then be transmitted to another geographically separate site and used
to power two or more reactors. Reactors could in theory be cascaded
indefinitely. Two drawbacks of cold fusion are the requirement for water and
the need to occasionally replace electrodes. Some cold fusion researchers
have changed the terminology to "low-energy nuclear transmutation".


Hybrid Cold-Fusion Hydrogen Reactor.

This reactor is intended to be an economical super-efficient heater for
homes and as a hot water heater. The device is so new that its potential
ultimate electrical input-to-thermal output conversion gain is yet to be
experimentally determined. Applications could include heating homes and
other buildings, greenhouses, and fish tanks. The electrodes are made of
nickel. Because the country has nickel deposits, it could manufacture its
own hybrid cold fusion hydrogen reactors.


Gas-Phase Catalytic Fusion.

Activated carbon catalysts are loaded with various precious metals (by
weight, in the range of 0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent). Palladium works best
so far. When these catalysts are heated, considerable excess heat is
produced reliably when such catalysts are exposed to several atmospheres of
heavy hydrogen gas (deuterium gas). Pairs of deuterium atoms are fused to
produce waste helium-4 atoms plus abundant clean heat. No lethal radiation
is released. One cubic kilometer of ocean water contains enough deuterium
that when catalytically fused, the energy released equals the chemical
combustion energy in all of the earth's known oil reserves. With suitable
insulation, the process, once started, is self-heating. Temperatures can
rise well above the boiling temperature of water. Engineered with efficient
heat exchangers, thermal/electrical energy generators can be built in sizes
for applications ranging from mobile homes to large centralized generating
stations. No electrolysis is involved nor are finicky electrodes required as
with some other types of low-energy nuclear transmutation devices. However,
the device's requirement for rare precious metals such as palladium could
hinder widespread use.


Fiber-Based Cold Fusion Power Cell.

This is a cold fusion reactor which is highly competitive with the Patterson
Power Cell. Patents have been applied for. Demonstration products could be
manufactured and prototypes readied for distribution within six months after
funding. International Nickel Company is considered a strong strategic
partner. (The resort's country has nickel deposits.)


Light-Polarizing Photovoltaic Film.

The light-polarizing photovoltaic film known as LUMELOID (trademark) is a
stretch-oriented polymer film about 0.3 microns thick which mimics
photosynthesis. Light energy is absorbed in a molecular antenna which
converts it to electron energy. The electron energy is then rectified by a
molecular tunnel diode comprising an electron donor, an insulating space and
an electron acceptor. Voltage and current is generated in the plane of the
film parallel to the stretch axis.

Conventional silicon photocells are 25 per cent efficient in theory, but in
practice attain only 4-10 per cent. The silicon concentrator cell
theoretically has a 32 per cent efficiency, but in practice has reached only
15 per cent, and is too expensive.

LUMELOID (trademark) has a theoretical efficiency of 72 per cent. Initially
its efficiency is expected to be comparable to existing photocells. However,
because of the film's high theoretical efficiency, with further R and D,
LUMELOID (trademark) is expected to soon surpass conventional photocell
efficiency. More importantly, the low cost per watt of LUMELOID (trademark)
represents a tremendous cost decrease over presently available sources of
solar energy and would facilitate its early acceptance in the energy market.

The projected cost of the basic LUMELOID (trademark) thin film is $1.00 per
square meter, and the assembly which comprises a LUMELOID (trademark) film
on a substrate with microelectronics circuitry, is about $5.00 per square
meter. Its capital investment cost is about 30 cents per watt. This is a
fraction of all conventional electric energy producing technologies. The
capital cost of fossil fuel generation from large power plants is over $1.50
per watt, nuclear energy is more than $6.00 per watt, and present
semiconductor photovoltaic devices are more than $4.00 per watt.

LUMELOID (trademark) will be available in rolls at low cost, affording easy
transportation, and any amount of power during sunlight hours by just
rolling it out flat on any surface. Eventually with the development of
QUENSOR (trademark), which is like a very thin battery (see below), a
combined LUMELOID (trademark)-QUENSOR (trademark) sheet may be spread out on
a roof or on the ground, and will provide electric power day and night,
available on demand.

"Diad" is an acronym for Donor-Insulator-Acceptor-Device which acts as a
diode. Molecular diads have been chemically synthesized. LUMELOID
(trademark) incorporates diads in a stretch-oriented electrically conductive
polarized film. The linear polarizing molecule in the film acts as antennae
to absorb a resolved component of the energy of the light photons in the
plane of the film. Diads are essential in LUMELOID (trademark) to convert
the energized electrons to unidirectional (DC) electric power.

When two polarized films are positioned with their stretch axes
perpendicular, light is almost completely absorbed. Using two crossed films
with electrodes connected in series or parallel, ordered diads in LUMELOID
(trademark) enable the conversion of light to electric power at 72 per cent
theoretical efficiency. This principle was demonstrated at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory by converting microwave to DC electric power using
rectifying antennae at 82 per cent efficiency.


Femto Diode Photovoltaic Glass Sheet.

The LEPCON (trademark) femto diode concept is similar in principle to
LUMELOID (trademark), which provides a technology mimicking photosynthesis,
absorbing light energy with a molecular antennae structure, and rectifying
the electron energy by the known phenomena called electron tunneling. In
contrast to LUMELOID (trademark), however, LEPCON (trademark) comprises the
durable materials of sub-micron metal on a glass substrate sheet. (A "femto"
is one quadrillionth (10-15)).)

A device for fabricating LEPCON (trademark) photovoltaic sheets in
commercial production is called "Supersebter", an acronym for Super
Submicron Electron Beamwriter. The Supersebter utilizes 100,000 rows and
100,000 columns to position 10 billion electron emitters on a square meter
sheet by a lithographic process. This process produces 10 billion electron
beams simultaneously to write the nanostructure patterns of femto diodes on
the sheet. A square-meter LEPCON (trademark) photovoltaic sheet could be
produced in twenty seconds at a cost of about 50 cents per watt and a
lifetime expectancy of over 50 years.

LEPCON (trademark) panels could be utilized by utility companies in solar
farms. It has been calculated that LEPCON (trademark) panels covering a
150-kilometer x 150-kilometer area in a desert region could produce over
250,000 MW of electric power, enough for most of the United States.

This successful commercial fabrication of the LEPCON (trademark) femto diode
structure should lead to many other advanced nanostructure devices. For
example, computer circuitry could be miniaturized 100-fold, efficient laser
lighting devices could be produced, and vast improvements could be made on
high-definition 2D to 3D TV flat-panel displays. (The 1993 Alvin Marks
patent on a monomolecular resist significantly increases the resolution of
the nanostructures.)


Quantum High Energy Density Storage or Retrieval Device.

Essentially a very thin battery, the solid-state Quantum High Energy Density
Storage or Retrieval Device (QUENSOR (trademark)) has an energy density of
about 1-15 kilowatt-hours/kilogram, which is comparable to gasoline, or
more. A fundamentally new principle and a new method of manufacture is
employed.

Electric energy is stored or retrieved from quantum dipole electric fields
throughout the volume of the QUENSOR (trademark) film. Electric energy is
stored in the QUENSOR (trademark) film by charging the dipole electric
fields from an electric energy source. Electric energy is retrieved from a
QUENSOR (trademark) film by discharging the dipole electric fields and
supplying the energy to a load. Electric breakdown in the film is avoided
because positive and negative electric charges in the film are balanced
everywhere. Busbars attached to metal layers are connected to terminals for
charging or discharging the QUENSOR (trademark) film.

A composite photovoltaic LUMELOID (trademark) and QUENSOR (trademark) panel
may be used for the storage or retrieval of solar-electric energy day or
night on demand.

Eight patents protecting the LUMELOID (trademark), LEPCON (trademark), and
QUENSOR (trademark) technologies have been issued, and additional patent
applications have been filed.


Buried Contact Multijunction Thin Film Solar Cell.

In the past, to produce high-performance solar cells, expensive high-quality
solar cell material were required.This new solar cell approach produces high
efficiency cells but with the use of much lower quality material than
previously possible; material 100-1,000 times lower in quality than the
worst presently used in commercial silicon cells. Using this approach, the
major material costs in making the modules becomes the cost of the glass
used in the modules.

The approach involves the deposition of a very thin layer of silicon upon
the glass cover. During deposition, fluctuations are introduced in the
properties of these layers to produce a multilayer structure. Three separate
ideas are combined:

The first new idea is to use a multilayer structure, which provides the
tolerance to the use of low quality material; material 100-1,000 times
poorer than the worst used in present commercial cells. The second is using
a laser grooved approach which allows correct contacting to each of the
layers in the cell. The third is the automatic series interconnection of the
cells which results from the laser grooving approach and greatly simplifies
module fabrication, contributing to low processing costs.

High efficiency can still be obtained by this approach but with material
costs not appreciably higher than the glass used in the modules. In the
normal approach, material costs alone are over $2 per watt of electrical
output. In the new approach, material costs are only about 10 cents per
watt, about 20 times smaller. Total solar power costs are expected to be
cheaper than fossil or nuclear power.


Solar Hydrogen Producer.

This simple device efficiently uses all solar wavelengths to make hydrogen
in abundance. The hydrogen could replace natural gas in pipelines, and be a
base for the so-called "hydrogen economy".


Hydrogen Tank.

A hydrogen tank was developed by the same inventor (now dead) of the above
solar hydrogen producer that is so safe it can be punctured with rifle
bullets.


Super-Steam Technology.

This machine combines compressed air, untreated or even polluted water, and
almost any combustible fuel to produce steam at any pressure or temperature.
The response is instant compared with a conventional boiler taking hours to
reach operating pressure and temperature. The efficiency is over 90 per
cent, which compares favorably with a conventional boiler's efficiency of 40
per cent. Maintenance costs, fuel consumption, and air pollution all go way
down. 3500 applications have been found for super-steam technology.
Electricity can be generated for 1 cent per kilowatt-hour. Super-steam
technology can be scaled from the size of a one-pound coffee can to a house.

Super-steam technology could be combined with the aforementioned solar
hydrogen producer and hydrogen tank for on-site renewable energy uses.


Double-Exposure Flat-Plate Solar Collector.

Apparently combines photo-voltaic and solar thermal collecting.


Environmental Heat Engine.

Has some similarity to refrigerator or heat pump. Working fluid of ammonia
or carbon dioxide is expanded by propane heater, cold fusion thermal
reactor, or environmental heat to move pistons. Applications include vehicle
engines, small-scale on-site electrical generators, and large-scale water
lifters for dams and canals. (Could double electrical output of Hoover Dam.)
This is a variation of Dennis Lee's low-temperature phase-change engine
which the inventor (now dead) claimed is superior to Lee's engine.


Brown Nuclear Battery.

Small "nuclear" battery uses tritium to power small circuits and electrical
devices for several years. Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen with
a half-life of 12 years. These nuclear batteries use beta emitters which are
similar to devices used in smoke detectors and to illuminate wrist watches.
The key approach is the methods used by the inventor to "funnel" the emitted
beta particles (electrons) into the affiliated circuits so that a useable
voltage is produced.

The Brown nuclear battery has many uses, especially for computer-chip
applications. A very small "nuclear" battery can be used to power a computer
chip or computer chip set for several years. The battery could be about the
same size as the packaged chip and be mounted directly on or adjacent to the
chip. Many other applications are available. The nuclear radiation consists
of beta particles which are electrons and can do no harm unless the battery
material is ground up and swallowed.


Perpetual Battery.

The hyper-cap E-converter is a thick quarter-sized battery which would put
out .001 watt "forever" for such applications as critical components inside
fail-safe computers, cellular telephones, etc. The energy comes from tapping
ether fluctuations.


Clem Over-Unity Vegetable-Oil Engine.

Richard Clem was a heavy equipment operator who had noticed that a hot
asphalt sprayer would continue to run for up to an hour even after the power
was turned off! So he built a modified version as a 200-pound engine which
ran on vegetable oil at 300 degrees and was started by a 12-volt battery.
The heat is internally generated by the engine. During a nine-day test
conducted by Bendix Corporation engineers, the engine in its self-running
mode consistently generated 350 horsepower into a dynamometer. The engine is
constructed from off-the-shelf components except for a hollow shaft and a
custom cone with enclosed spiral channels.

If the automobile industry adopts the Clem over-unity engine, motorists
could change its eight gallons of vegetable oil only every 150,000 miles and
never buy any gasoline. To illustrate the engine's durability, the only
working model of the Clem engine has been continually running on his son's
farm for several years.

Combining the Clem over-unity engine with the hydrosonic pump at the resort
area could provide distilled ocean water as well as hot water for space
heating, kitchens, and bathrooms at no energy cost.

The Clem over-unity vegetable-oil engine is not patented. It may be fairly
straightforward to set up a small machine shop in the resort's country for
manufacturing hollow shafts and cones. Off-the-shelf components could be
shipped in for subsequent commercial assembly and sale of Clem over-unity
engines. Hydrosonic pumps could be either shipped in or locally manufactured
under license and then combined with Clem engines into desalination units.
The market for efficient self-powered desalination units ought to be
enormous. Unfortunately, I have no idea as to the maximum practical size
that self-powered desalination units could be built.


Water Engine.

Hydrogen is formed by creating an underwater electrical discharge between
two aluminum electrodes. Aluminum wire is fed against a rotating aluminum
drum. A hydrogen-fueled 900-kilogram car runs 600 kilometers on 20 liters of
water and one kilogram of aluminum.

The required high voltage can be obtained from the battery, a generator off
the drive shaft, or two coils in parallel and fed from a conventional
distributor.

The hydrogen gas fills a small buffer tank which in turn supplies hydrogen
to the engine on demand. When the tank's pressure exceeds a predetermined
level, the electrodes are separated so that hydrogen generation is
interrupted. As the pressure drops to a certain level, the aluminum wire is
again fed against the aluminum drum.


Converter of Zero-Point Electromagnetic Radiation Energy to Electrical
Energy.

The existence of zero-point electromagnetic radiation was discovered in 1958
by Dutch physicist M. J. Sparnaay. Zero-point electromagnetic radiation is
the same as the electromagnetic waves radiated from radio and television
antennas except that the frequencies are random, incoherent, are present
everywhere in the universe, and vary from zero cycles per second to
infinity. Other names include "zero-point energy field", "vacuum field
energy", "etheric energy field", and "ether".

Mr. Sparnaay had continued the experiments carried out by Hendrik B. G.
Casimir in 1948 which showed the existence of a force between two uncharged
parallel plates which arose from electromagnetic radiation surrounding the
plates in a vacuum. This force has since been named the "Casimir effect" to
honor the discoverer. (See "Casimer Effect Self-Charging Energy Cell"
below.)

Mr. Sparnaay discovered that the forces acting on the plates arose from not
only thermal radiation but also from another type of radiation now known as
classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Mr. Sparnaay determined that
not only did the zero point electromagnetic radiation exists in a vacuum,
but also that it persisted even at a temperature of absolute zero. Because
it exists in a vacuum, zero-point electromagnetic radiation is homogeneous
and isotropic as well as ubiquitous.

In addition, since zero-point electromagnetic radiation does not vary, the
intensity of the radiation at any frequency is proportional to the cube of
that frequency. Consequently the intensity of the radiation increases
without limit as the frequency increases. The result is an infinite energy
density for the radiation spectrum.

The special characteristics of the zero-point electromagnetic radiation of
having a virtually infinite energy density and that it is omnipresent even
in outer space make it very desirable as an energy source. However, the high
energy densities only exist at very high frequencies. These large energies
can be collected with small antenna-like structures (frequency is inversely
proportional to size). But the frequencies are so high that they are
unusable for practical energy uses.

With two antennas of very slightly different sizes, the converter collects
zero-point electromagnetic radiation of two very slightly different
frequencies. The converter then superimposes the two frequencies which
results in a far lower beat frequency. The energy contained in the beat
frequency is then transformed to practical electrical power which can be
made available in any location on earth or in space. Applications include
transportation, heating, cooling as well as many others.


Water-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine with Garrett Electrolytic
Carburetor.

Henry "Dad" Garrett and his son, Charles H. Garrett, in 1935 patented and
exhibited an automobile that ran on water substituted for gasoline.
Actually, the fuel was hydrogen after the water was broken down by
electrolysis. The only items needed to convert a gasoline-powered auto to a
water burner was an electrolytic carburetor and installation of a generator
of double normal capacity for the breaking down of the water. Instant starts
in any weather, no fire hazards, cooler operation and plenty of power and
speed were claimed.

Rather than store the inflammable hydrogen, the same process makes the gas
without a storage chamber in which the flames from the motor's cylinders
might react. Water is broken down into its component gases by passage of an
electric current through it from electrodes immersed in the water. Hydrogen
collects at the negative pole, and oxygen collects at positive. The hydrogen
is then mixed with air and introduced directly into the cylinders. For an
ordinary automobile, an electrolysis chamber of about a quart in capacity is
big enough.

In summary, this simple process can provide:

Heat - through the burning of hydrogen/oxygen.

Power for local energy generation - the explosive energy to drive a piston
to drive a shaft to power a generator. The generator then charges a battery
network which feeds an inverter (converts DC to AC) to run your house.

Motive power for transport power - explosive energy drives the piston to
drive your vehicle.

Light - condoluminescence - hydrogen/oxygen exposed to phosphor-coated
surfaces for light generation.

Sound amplification - flame speakers where flame is electrostatically
deflected at audio rates to produce sound. The hydrogen/oxygen mix is
generated locally rather than using bottled gases such as propane, butane,
etc.


Papp Engine.

Joseph Papp was granted US Patent #3,670,494 for his "Noble Gas Plasma
Engine". A mixture of recycled inert gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton,
and xenon) is exposed to a high-voltage discharge in a sealed cylinder with
a piston. The spark causes the gases to expand violently though no
combustion occurs. Mechanical energy is delivered by the piston's
displacement. The gases immediately collapse to their original density, and
the cycle is repeated. After several thousand hours the gases lose their
elasticity and are replaced. The operating cost is 15 cents an hour.

The first prototype was a simple 90-horsepower Volvo engine with upper end
modifications. Attaching the Volvo pistons to pistons fitting the sealed
cylinders, the engine worked perfectly with an output of three hundred
horsepower. The inventor claimed it would cost about twenty five dollars to
charge each cylinder every sixty thousand miles.

There were indications that such an engine could provide its own electrical
power and being a closed system, require no fuel. It is not by definition an
electromagnetic engine, however. It is believed that at the heart of the
Papp engine is the development of high-density electrical charge clusters
which provide the energy to expand the gases.

Other patents are 5319336, 4151431, 3670494, 4046167 - Mechanical
Accumulator, 3680431 - Method and Means for Generating Explosive Forces, and
4,428,193 - Inert Gas Fuel, Fuel Preparation Apparatus and System for
Extracting Useful Work from the Fuel.

A demonstration of the Papp engine to representatives of the Stanford
Research Institute resulted in killing one person and injuring another. Papp
himself is believed to have died from apparent neutron radiation from his
engine.

Jim Kettner of the Space Energy Association recently stated in a letter to
me that this is the best self-running device he knows of which can produce
substantial amounts of power. A variation of the Papp engine is currently
being built by Jim Sabori and, if sufficiently funded, was to have been
ready by the end of 1998.

In a recent letter from Hal Fox of Trenergy, Inc., Fox states that he
believes that the Papp engine works but hopes that much simpler ways of
making energy can be developed. There are several groups working on versions
of the Papp engine. It seems to keep recycling through the new-energy
community.


Muller Motor/Generator.

Electrical generators in common use require external torque from gas,
hydroelectric, and steam turbines, for example, to overcome back
electromotive force. Bill Muller's magnetic motor/generator eliminates back
electromotive force. The coils are removed from the rotor and instead
wrapped around powerful magnets equally spaced around the stator. Magnets
are also equally spaced around the rotating disk. However, the number of
rotor magnets is one more than the number of stator magnets.

A typical commercial motor involves pushing and pulling magnetically where
in the Muller motor/generator only the magnetic pulling effect occurs. A
perfectly balanced arrangement of the magnets results in a disk-like rotor
that can be turned with no effort at all. The completely reversible result
is if current is applied to the stator coils, the rotor turns. If the rotor
is turned, the stator coils can generate current to be supplied to a load.

The stator coils are wrapped around cores made of inexpensive
Muller-patented amorphous material which eliminates heat-producing
hysteresis and eddy current losses. Because of instantaneous saturation and
permeability, much less wire is needed for the stator coils which greatly
reduces both ohmic resistance losses and inductance losses. No brushes are
needed like in conventional direct current generators and motors which wear
out. Bearing friction losses are greatly reduced by both weight reduction
and using Muller's cone-shaped magnetic bearings (patent applied for).


Electrical Generator.

Two pairs of electromagnets warp permanent bar magnet's magnetic fields
across field coils to achieve over-unity electrical energy conversion gain,
the magnitude of which is unknown. Requires additional resonant circuit
components. Appears to be a potentially robust generator of electricity.


Self-Contained Power Supply.

Uses tightly wound coil spring, flywheel, and magnets to achieve over-unity
energy conversion gain. Potential market is as a battery pack replacement.


Motor/Generator.

Incorporates permanent magnets which provide the drive torque by pulling
rotor and stator poles together with an electromagnetic opposed excitation
input pulsation used to weaken that magnetic pull to allow the poles to
separate. Power output claimed to be 3 times power input.


WIN Zero Point Electrical Energy Converter.

Extracts AC current with an output power over input power gain as high as
268.6 per cent.  It generates electricity by collecting electrons between
E-dam cermets in a vacuum. A charge of electrons is oscillated in a tank
circuit, and energy is collected or added to that charge from the vacuum.
The mechanism is believed to be the Casimer effect. Solid-state with no
moving parts and no size restrictions, individual units can be built to
power a 15-kilowatt home or a 20-megawatt arc furnace without outside energy
input.


Conversion of Aluminum Internal Combustion Engines to Magnetic Motor.

Heads replaced with magnet arrangement so that the vehicle doesn't need fuel
nor battery recharging. Two-inch square Chinese super-magnets are embedded
in the piston heads. Same-size magnets are embedded on outside of disks
mounted on shaft, one magnet to each cylinder. A toothed gearwheel mounted
on the front end of the shaft is linked by a chain drive to a gearwheel on
the crankshaft. An electric motor is mounted on the block to turn the
crankshaft. As crankshaft rotates, when each piston is up closest to top of
the cylinder, its matching magnet is also at its angular point closest to
the head. The two opposing south poles repel each other with 1,000 lb. of
force. (This compares with the approximately 250 lb. of force on the piston
head in a gasoline engine.)

The engine would still need oil changes every 50,000 to 80,000 miles.
Because it runs cool, the block could be made of hard plastic which ought to
be of cheaper material and easier to mold and machine than aluminum. A
constant-speed motor, it would require a continuously variable transmission
in order to power a vehicle. If the electric motor is replaced with a Muller
magnetic motor (see above), the combined energy conversion gain is projected
to be about 300.


Searl Effect Generator.

The Searl effect generator (SEG) can be used to charge the batteries in a
self-powered electric vehicle. A solid-state device, the heart of an SEG is
a series of three concentric magnetic rings with magnetic rollers going
around the rings. Both the rollers and rings are comprised of four layers of
titanium, iron, nylon, and neodymium.

The magnetic fields impressed on the rollers have both AC and DC components.
The AC component is for floating the rollers so they don't touch the rings.
The DC component is to prevent them from flying off.  The innermost set
contains a minimum of 12 rollers for the same reason that a linear motor
will not operate with less than 12 phases.

The inner set of rollers travel around at 250 miles per hour, the middle set
travels at approximately 600 miles per hour, and the outer set at
approximately 1500 miles per hour. Hundreds of millions of volts are
generated the energy of which is picked up by brushes positioned all around
the outside set of rollers.

An SEG also creates an anti-gravity field. An uncontrolled SEG will rise
about 50 feet as the rollers increase speed, emit a light blue halo which
indicates energy is being extracted from the ether, and then shoot up into
the sky gaining speed, never to be seen again. At least one roof has been
holed by an SEG. The friction-less rollers can be prevented from reaching
the critical velocity that produces lift by use of a "governor", either
mechanical or electronic.

An SEG can be easily controlled by immersing it in an electromagnetic wave
field the frequency of which is a harmonic of the SEG's primary frequency.
While in resonance, the magnetic poles of the rollers reach a unification
state, and they stop moving.

The inventor has built and flown a small "inverse gravity" vehicle. A flying
saucer-like SEG-powered aircraft about the size of a bus is currently being
built in England by a private group.

The inventor for some years independently powered his house off the power
grid with a home-sized electrical generator version of the SEG. A
householder could set up a 45 x 45-cm unit and generate an output of 11
kilowatts of free electrical power.

Oddly, a house powered by an SEG has been observed to have greater healing
powers than conventionally electric powered houses. The healing effect is
claimed to be due to the electrons zapping the occupants, taking away pain
and returning blood more quickly to damaged tissue. The SEG would also help
combat asthma, bronchitis, hay fever and lung complaints due to the
increased supply of oxygen in the body. Conventional methods of electric
power do not pump out electrons which results in tired eyes and a tired
brain.

The SEG's negative charge also means that dust stays in the carpet instead
of floating in the air. This is similar in action to negative ion generators
sometimes sold as air fresheners.

A German power company is reportedly considering replacing a nuclear power
station with eight fuel-less SEGs costing a total of about $4.5 million and
generating a total of 240 megawatts with no pollution.


Gravito Magnetic Device.

The gravito magnetic device (GMD), also known as the David Hamel machine, is
a cheap version of the Searl effect generator (SEG) (see above) that can be
built with off-the-shelf components. The GMD has magnets attached to radial
spokes or arms that are jointed. These magnets are floated in a magnetic
housing and when properly biased, continue to spin, gaining momentum and
speed with each rotation and achieving the same tremendous electrostatic
buildup on the outside rim as the SEG.

The parts inside the GMD are configured in such a way as to promote an
enclosed constant variation of opposing magnetic fields. In the resting
state, the moving cones are balanced and stabilized in a magnetic field
repulsion, like a magnetic bearing. The startup of the GMD is initiated by
lowering a magnet at the center top of the shell, inside the shell, towards
the momentarily magnetically balanced moving cones.

As the center magnet, which opposes the one attached at the center of the
upper moving cone, is lowered inside the GMD, it forces the upper cone to
move sideways, shifting the magnetic balance between the cones inside the
GMD. The cones stay offset to each other for a short while and then
plasma-like energy starts to build up around the GMD. This energy built up
creates a shift of colors from red-orange to light blue and then white.
Following this effect the GMD starts to lose weight and quickly generates an
upper lift in a greater ratio than its total weight.

It should be emphasized that the power generated, surrounding the GMD, is
extremely powerful and radiates, causing interruptions of electron flow in
normal electrical systems, i.e. lights, cars, transformers, and interferes
with electromagnetic transmissions. So it is without saying that this
machine has to be operated with serious caution when completed and
activated. However, if a control system is in place, it is easy to stop its
effect. One of the main purposes of GMD research is to understand the
effects of enclosed opposing magnetic fields that have varying vector
angles.

The GMD is potentially a versatile, useful technology which also generates
antigravity. The GMD has a powerful upward thrust causing it to rise in the
air in a manner similar to a Searl effect generator (see above). (The first
assembled model after two hours of increasing spin velocity unexpectedly
crashed through the roof and escaped.) When the inner workings of what
causes the secondary electrogravitational fields are understood, it is
probable that various devices can be created providing plentiful energy of
different types.

It should be noted that all building materials for the GMD are readily
available almost anywhere in the world, and the cost is relatively cheap. A
lot of hand work is required but nothing that is unreasonably unattainable.
No special machining or parts are required. Only patience and devotion is
needed.


Casimer Effect Self-Charging Energy Cell.

The force of gravity is theorized by some scientists as the ether weakly
pushing two objects such as a book and the earth into each other's shadow.
Gravity can also be thought of as the long-range version of the Casimer
effect. The Casimer effect predicts that two metal plates close together
will attract each other.

Consider the plates set at a certain distance apart. In the space between
the plates, only those ether (vacuum) field fluctuations for which a whole
number of half-waves just spans the distance can exist, just like waves
formed by shaking a rope tied at both ends. Outside the plates, the
fluctuations can have many more values because there is space. The number of
modes outside the plates, all of which carry energy and  momentum, is
greater than those inside. This imbalance PUSHES THE PLATES TOGETHER.

The proprietary Casimer effect self-charging energy cell contains many
extremely thin layers of carbon, magnesium, chromium oxide, and a couple of
other elements and compounds. The result is analogous to a boat that has
some rather large leaks. More water pours into the boat as fast as water is
bailed out. Likewise, as electromagnetic energy is drawn out of the Casimer
effect self-charging energy cell when inserted in an electrical circuit,
energy is drawn in from the surrounding ether. Physically and functionally,
the Casimer effect energy cell is like a solid-state battery that recharges
itself with some valuable features such as simplicity and compactness.


Switched Reluctance Motor.

The switched reluctance motor is a motor design that has been around for
many decades but has never been commercialized. The inventor of the Casimer
effect self-charging energy cell is also developing an efficient commercial
version of the switched reluctance motor specifically designed with modern
switching components. The intended end use is for powering electric
vehicles. The switched reluctance motor has the key advantages of ease of
manufacture, simplicity, and allowing complete vehicle motion control. No
claims are being made that it is capable of over-unity power conversion.

Most self-powered electric vehicle power train concepts involve combining an
over-unity motor (to extend the range between battery charges) with an
on-board battery charger and a pack of batteries or super-capacitors. The
Casimer effect self-charging energy cell offers some important advantages
such as much simpler mounting of one to several battery-like cells in the
vehicle's engine compartment and greatly increased maintainability and
dependability. With the cells' self-charging capability, the efficiency of
the vehicle's electric motor thus becomes less of an issue. Electric motor
features such as controllability, manufacturing cost, simplicity, and
reliability can thus be given much greater consideration.

This particular self-powered electric vehicle power train combination may be
the best one. If plugged into the electric grid while parked in the owner's
garage, the revenue from running the electric meter backwards could
eventually pay for the vehicle's purchase cost.


Joe's Energy Cell.

The Joe's energy cell basically comprises of two metal containers, one
inside the other. Both containers are filled with specially charged and
cleaned water with the inner container perforated to allow water to freely
move between the inside and outside of the inner container. The outside
container is electrically connected to the anode of a battery, and the inner
container connected to the battery's cathode. The outside container is
closed except for an orifice to which a thin pipe is attached. The other end
of the pipe is attached to the outside housing of the carburetor of a
gasoline engine. Gas/energy is transferred to the carburetor through the
pipe. The entire cell including the pipe must be electrically insulated from
the engine.

Various designs and shapes of both containers have been experimentally
built. The original and simplest comprised of both containers as long pipes
with the inner pipe, which was perforated, inside the outer pipe.

At least fourteen vehicles in Australia have been fitted with different
versions of Joe's energy cells to be driven without fuel nor battery
charging. The engine, radiator and exhaust pipe stays cold enough to freeze
water - warranting replacing water in the block with transmission fluid. The
timing does have to be advanced between 25 and 80 degrees, depending on the
type of engine, to allow the engine to run smoothly. The engine's power
doubles over that when petrol-fueled.

The Joe energy cell is not explainable using conventional mainstream
physics. It is not even known if the process inside the cylinders is
implosion, explosion, or both. No gasoline is mixed with air inside the
carburetor. It appears that zero-point energy is somehow drawn from the
ether and converts the air entering the cylinders into some kind of fuel.
The inventor claims the process increases the frequency and energy of the
air.

For converting existing gasoline-powered vehicles into self-powered vehicles
which don't require fuel nor battery charging from a local electric utility,
adding the Joe's energy cell seems to offer by far the easiest modification.
Nearly the entire engine is left alone. A separate heater would have to be
provided since the engine runs cold. The vehicle will not rust, and paint
will not oxidize.

Guy McCarthy guy@... has provided the following insightful
analysis of the Joe energy cell from a biodynamics perspective:

[0.1] The "Joe Cell" (described in NEXUS magazine, Aug-Sep '98, pp. 43-46)
is an electrical device attached to the carburetor of an ordinary automobile
engine which allegedly enables it to run for extended periods with the fuel
line disconnected.

[0.2] Biodynamics is a science of natural forces and agriculture inspired by
the Austrian philosopher Rudolf Steiner. It pre-dates "Organics" as the
original alternative to chemical/industrial agriculture. Biodynamics has
achieved limited recognition in the United States and Canada, but is widely
practiced in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia.

Main Text:

[1.0] The Joe cell uses water as a storage medium, which, when charged
above a certain threshold, collects additional energy as needed by the
engine. The initial charge is not depleted as the engine runs, but will
dissipate under certain conditions. This matches a key attribute of the
biodynamic ether, which attracts more ether to itself once the local
concentration reaches a certain threshold. Without adequate boundaries (or
storage conditions) the etheric charge build-up will dissipate.

[2.0] The motive reaction in the engine seems to be *implosion*, since the
ignition timing must be advanced so far into the compression stroke. (Note
that 80 degrees is nearly 2/3 of a typical compression cycle, which totals
about 135 degrees in a 4-stroke engine.) Implosion may be considered
equivalent to "a sudden condensation of the ether" which is also thought to
be the motive reaction that creates lightning and thunder in the atmosphere.
According to biodynamic researchers, condensation is a state change from a
more rarefied ether into a less ratified one, releasing energy in the
process.

[2.1] Biodynamics deals with four states of ether which are equivalent to
the four elements intuited by ancient philosophers:

Warmth Ether corresponds to the Fire element
Light Ether corresponds to the Air element
Tone Ether (or "Chemical Ether") corresponds to the Water element
Life Ether corresponds to the Earth element

[2.2] In the physical world, substance tends to flow from a high potential
to a low potential. This is what the concept of "entropy" and the Second Law
of Thermodynamics are based on. But in the etheric world of living energies,
the inverse is true. Ether is naturally attracted to itself and flows from
low potential to high potential. This is why living organisms continue to
draw nutrients and life forces into themselves while the rest of the world
is supposedly running down. Ether penetrates substance, and substance
influences ether. This dynamic interplay is essential to life on the
physical plane.

[2.3] Under favorable conditions, the following etheric condensations will
occur:

Warmth Ether --> Light Ether, releasing energy as lightning
Light Ether --> Tone Ether, releasing energy as thunder
Tone Ether --> Life Ether, releasing energy as biological manifestation

[2.4] Recall that lightning and thunder sometimes occur independently of
each other (as in "heat lightning" and "rolling thunder"), while at other
times they are closely linked. Clearly any reasonable explanation for these
phenomena must allow for both cases. The common notion that lightning and
thunder are caused by static discharge between air masses is clearly
untenable. A buildup of static charge in such magnitudes could only occur
under extremely dry conditions; the typical thunderstorm is certainly not
dry.

[2.5] The biodynamic researcher points to a well-defined cumulus cloud in
mid-summer as the ideal collector of etheric energy. Hour by hour it grows,
drawing abundant warmth ether from the atmosphere into itself as well as
particles of dust and moisture. The cloud builds itself taller and taller -
its boundaries sharply distinct from the rest of the sky. Eventually the
cloud becomes saturated - turning darker and forming a mighty thunderhead.
At this point, anyone who is familiar with weather patterns in open country
is headed for shelter. They know that a violent thunderstorm could be
unleashed at any moment.

[2.6] Just a few months ago the author observed such a phenomena in central
Maryland. The top of the cloud was puffy and brilliant white, illuminated by
the late afternoon sun. In contrast, the bottom was flat and dark, laden
with moisture. Great bolts of lightning began to crackle about its upper
regions. The air felt clear and energized while all around trees were
bending and twisting in sudden gusts of wind. When the storm finally broke
it was both fearsome and beautiful, a mighty discharge of lightning,
thunder, and rain.

[2.7] We can surmise that the Joe cell becomes highly charged with etheric
energy, and that this charge is transferred through the carburetor to the
air entering each cylinder. As the compression stroke begins the volume of
air is compressed, causing a further concentration of etheric charge. Soon
the air becomes saturated with ether. At this point conditions in the
cylinder are similar to those within the thunderhead. The ignition spark,
far advanced into the compression stroke, serves to catalyze a condensation
reaction of the compressed ether. This sudden change of state causes the air
mixture to contract sharply, generating power through the remainder of the
compression stroke. Therefore the air mixture in each cylinder undergoes a
structural change, not a chemical one, and the flywheel is driven by
*suction* rather than combustion. With the exception of small amounts of
vapor from engine oil and perhaps trace elements from the engine and
muffler, the exhaust should be of substantially the same quality as the air
intake.

[2.8] Since warmth ether is the most rarefied ether, condensation will have
the effect of reducing or consuming warmth. Therefore implosion is a cool
process, which tends to absorb heat rather than release it. This matches
observations of the Joe cell in which the engine runs cold. Unlike
combustion, implosion is a "living" process, and as such produces no waste
heat or by-products.

[3.0] All three styles of Joe cell are based on concentric, insulated
cylinders. This is similar to the classic "orgone accumulator" discovered by
Wilhelm Reich. Reich found that metals tended to conduct ether while organic
materials tended to absorb it. By layering the two types of materials
together, Reich caused a directional flow of ether to occur. The orgone
accumulator was a six-sided box constructed with alternating layers of metal
and non-metallic materials.

[3.1] The inclusion of a 1.5-volt battery to maintain the charged condition
(and a 12-volt battery to create it) is an interesting variation on the
orgone accumulator design. There is precedent for this idea in
electrogravity documentation that has become available in recent years. (See
the USAF report "Electrogravitic Systems" that was released in 1995 as well
as patents by T. Townsend Brown.) The basic idea is that a charged condenser
exhibits a tendency to move towards its positive terminal. This is thought
to result from a net movement of ether in the opposite direction (from
positive to negative). Therefore a static electric charge stimulates a
directional flow of ether.

[3.2] The Joe cell design implies a net movement of ether from positive to
negatively charged terminals (i.e. towards the center of the cell and
towards the engine).

[4.0] The transfer of energy to the carburetor is accomplished by several
different conductors including plastic, copper, aluminum and rubber tubing.
The common material in all of these configurations is the *air* inside the
tubing. This is consistent with the biodynamic view that oxygen is an
excellent carrier of etheric forces. (Fertile soils are said to contain 50
per cent air for just this reason.) The metallic carburetor housing would
conduct the etheric energy to its interior surfaces, where incoming air
would absorb it and carry it into the cylinders.

[5.0] In conclusion, the Joe cell offers a compelling view of how ordinary
combustion engines might be modified to run on natural etheric energy. This
could be an important direction for future research. Validation of the
concept could be approached in three phases:

[5.1] Collecting a high concentration of etheric charge. For some ideas on
how to accomplish this, see "Geometric Energy Fields" at
http://www.twelvestar.com/sourceworks/ which includes specific instructions
for building resonant etheric devices.

[5.2] Stimulating a sudden condensation of ether by means of electric spark
and measuring the implosion effect in a pressurized container.

[5.3] Achieving reproducible evidence of successive implosion events within
a small engine mounted for laboratory testing.


Advanced Self-Powered Electric Vehicle Concept

Electric vehicles are clean, quiet, powerful, require much less maintenance
than gasoline or diesel-fueled vehicles, and inherently much simpler and
easier to manufacture. Their drawbacks have been a short range, long battery
recharging time, and a heavy, bulky battery pack. Clearly, self-powered
electric vehicles, if they could somehow be designed and manufactured at a
reasonable cost, would be a commercial success. Forbes January 25, 1999
compares golf carts (400,000 already sold) with personal computers.
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/99/0125/6302088a.htm

Self-powered electric vehicles at minimum must satisfy four requirements:
The battery ideally should not have the disadvantages of conventional
lead-acid batteries such as temperature sensitivity, low charge-to-weight
ratio, toxic materials, and finicky slow recharging. The electric motor
should be durable and highly efficient. Heating and air conditioning must be
provided. The really key difference from conventional electric vehicles is
having an on-board battery charger.

Electric bicycles with only one battery are inherently more practical than
conventional electric cars or trucks carrying a half-ton or so of batteries
stuffed into every available nook and cranny of the vehicle. When just one
battery out of one or two dozen batteries fails, the dead battery can be
time-consuming to find before replacement. Once a dead battery is replaced,
it could be a short time before another battery fails again. Besides
weighting much less and with the batteries taking up much less space, a
self-powered electric vehicle with an on-board battery charger would require
at most only a few batteries.

What follows is a discussion of candidate technologies which could be
combined into a reliable, commercially successful advanced self-powered
electric vehicle.


BATTERY

Alvin Snaper's Power Technology Battery.

Las Vegas resident Alvin Snaper (600 patents and new products) through his
company, Power Technology, Inc., is developing a superior new battery with
none of the drawbacks of all other types of batteries such as temperature
sensitivity. Increasing the surface area of the electroplates by up to 1000
times greatly increases current output and allows much quicker
charge/discharge rates. Different chemistry reduces the weight of the
battery by 50 per cent, reduces cost, and is much more environmentally
friendly than lead. (For more information, see
www.powerpwtc.com/business_of_issuer.htm.)

Maxwell Technologies Ultra-Capacitor.

Since there is no heat nor waste product buildup as with electrochemical
batteries, ultra-capacitors can easily last many hundreds of thousands of
extremely rapid and deep charge/discharge cycles. They can supply repeated
bursts of power for fractions of a second to several minutes. They are
especially useful for supercharging power for accelerations or climbing.
With their quick recharge capability, ultra-capacitors can easily capture
regenerative braking energy, extending the range of the vehicle. For
increased safety, they can be stored, assembled, maintained, and transported
while completely discharged. Since the energy stored is directly related to
the voltage, the amount of available energy can be easily monitored. This
precision eliminates the need for sophisticated state-of-charge algorithms.
Other advantages include temperature insensitivity and low maintenance.

Capacitors are inherently more capable than electrochemical batteries of
withstanding quick discharges of electricity to the motor when the driver
demands high acceleration by stepping on the throttle. It is conceivable
that ultra-capacitors could be combined with batteries to take advantage of
the best performance characteristics of both types.

Maxwell Technologies' commercially available PowerCache (trademark)
ultra-capacitors pack up to 100 times the energy of conventional capacitors
and can deliver ten times the power of ordinary batteries. Their
ultra-capacitor is a double-layer capacitor incorporating a unique
metal/carbon electrode and an advanced non-aqueous electrolytic solution. As
a potential is applied across the terminals, ions migrate to the
high-surface-area electrodes. The combination of available surface area and
proximity to the current collector provide an ultra-high capacitance for
this electrostatic process.

Ukrainian Capacitor-Like Battery.

The I. N. Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials Science, Kiev,
Ukraine, has invented an entirely new type of battery. Emtech LTD.,
Mississauga, Ontario is commercializing the battery and has applied for 11
patents. A set of conventional lead-acid batteries can propel a small
electric car for 100 miles or so, require several hours to recharge, and
weigh 1000 lb. An equivalent set of Ukrainian batteries is expected to weigh
approximately 200 lb., provide a much greater range of up to possibly
200-300 miles, require 15 to 30 minutes to recharge, and maintain full
voltage until 94 per cent discharge. The Ukrainian battery operates well in
the temperature range of -40 to +60 degrees centigrade. A side benefit of
the Ukrainian batteries is that they are made only of proprietary materials
which are environmentally friendly, plentiful, and inexpensive. (Dated 1993;
claims currently are not considered credible. Emtech LTD, which had the
commercialization license, recently went bankrupt. Nu Omnicomm Technologies,
Inc., of Salt Lake City, which has close ties to the I. N. Frantsevich
Institute for Problems of Materials Science, may be able to revive the
Ukrainian battery.)

A Ukrainian battery stores the charges in crystalline layers of a sheet-like
material similar in appearance to mica. Due to nonlinear quantum mechanic
effects, the electrical characteristic of each crystalline layer is that of
a capacitor as thin as one molecule. Since capacitance is inversely
proportional to thickness of the separation between layers, the practical
consequence of the Ukrainian battery is to electrically function in a manner
similar to that of a giant capacitor.

Ed Baldwin's Super-Capacitor.

Similar in electrical function to the Ukrainian battery, Ed Baldwin's
solid-state multi-layered "super-capacitor" has a very high dielectric
constant. It is believed ultimately capable of ten times the electrical
energy storage capacity per pound of lead-acid batteries.

Yasunori Takahashi's ultra-capacitor.

The Takahashi ultra-capacitor is rated at approximately 20 farads at 25
volts in a volume of about one cubic centimeter.

Blacklight Power's hydrino battery.

Blacklight Power is completing a 10-kilogram battery using hydrinos which
can supply 150 horsepower for 1,000 miles.

ON-BOARD ULTRA-CAPACITOR/BATTERY CHARGER

The famous inventor Dr. Nikola Tesla reportedly modified and drove a Pierce
Arrow automobile in 1931. Tesla's car required neither gasoline nor external
battery charging. The power source was an array of vacuum tubes apparently
similar to photo-multiplier tubes. Before and since then, dozens of other
inventors claimed to have developed or are developing devices for converting
relatively small input power to larger output power.

It is generally inaccurate to say that their devices produce more energy
than they consume which would violate the widely accepted physical law of
the conservation of energy. The accurate statement to make would be that a
small external energy input causes very large internal energy to be
transformed into large external energy output (electrical, thermal, and/or
mechanical).

An on-board charger is required to keep the ultra-capacitor/batteries fully
charged while the vehicle is parked as well as when the vehicle is motion.
Parked in a garage, the car's battery charger could feed electricity back
into the electric power grid and help pay for the car, if it were not for
potential safety problems for power company workers. Descriptions of some of
the more promising on-board charger technologies follow. (If only mentioned,
see additional details above.)

Blacklight Power's "hydrinos".

It is an exotic new source of clean energy from ordinary water.

Ken Shoulders' high-density charge clusters device (U.S. Patent 5,018,180).

A nearly solid-state device, it ultimately may put out one kilowatt of
electricity and one kilowatt of thermal energy per cubic inch. Its gain can
be increased so that it puts out 100 times as much power as its input
electrical power. However, the device's power conversion gain is more stable
with the gain at about 5 times. (Still being researched.)

Trenergy's plasma-injected transmutation, Dr. Case's gas-phase catalytic
fusion, fiber-based cold fusion power cell, and the hybrid cold-fusion
hydrogen reactor have electric-to-thermal energy conversion gains as high as
well over 100 to 1. Their energy comes from high-density clusters of
electrons carrying small numbers of protons at very high velocities to
target nuclei using relatively low voltages.

W. A. Lambertson's WIN zero point electrical energy converter extracts AC
current as high as 9.908 amperes using an input current of only 0.2596
amperes. It generates electricity by collecting electrons between "E-dams"
in a vacuum. A charge of electrons is oscillated in a tank circuit, and
energy is collected or added to that charge from the vacuum. Solid-state
with no moving parts and no size restrictions, individual units may
eventually be built to power a 15-kilowatt home or a 20-megawatt arc furnace
with an efficiency of 1000% or ten times the external input power.

The Correas' pulsed abnormal glow discharge reactor is an over-sized glass
vacuum tube which uses high-density charge clusters to produce useful
positive AC-to-DC electrical power conversion gains such as 483 per cent.

Converter of Zero-Point Electromagnetic Radiation Energy to Electrical
Energy. Converts very high frequencies of natural fluctuations of the
universal electromagnetic radiation field to usable electrical power at much
lower beat frequencies.

John Searl's Searl effect generator has three concentric rings of magnetic
rollers. Brushes positioned around the outer ring of rollers pick up
electricity.

Frank Richardson's electrical generator. Two pairs of electromagnets warp
permanent bar magnet's magnetic fields back and forth across field coils to
achieve over-unity electrical energy conversion gain. Requires additional
resonant circuit components.

ELECTRIC MOTOR

Of the many types of electrical rotating machines that have been developed,
of particular interest are those which are claimed to incorporate permanent
magnets in order to develop more mechanical output power than their
electrical input power. Such claims are considered suspect by many skeptics
since they apparently violate the so-called law of conservation of energy.
Skepticism is often reinforced by frequent power gain measurement errors.
However, it has also been suggested that the key to over-unity power
conversion gain in such motors is to use super-powerful permanent magnets at
a very high rotating speed. A so-called "super-efficient" electric motor,
besides providing motive power, could also act as an on-board
capacitor/battery charger whether the vehicle is cruising, idling, or
parked.

Perm-Mag Motor.

An over-unity energy converter claimed to have a gain of up to several times
of shaft rotational power over electrical input power, the super-efficient
"perm-mag" motor generates 1 horsepower per pound of weight. Used in a
self-powered electric vehicle, a 50-pound, 50-horsepower electric motor is
equivalent to a 250-horsepower gasoline-fueled engine.

The perm-mag motor's inventor, Ronald Brandt, has successfully demonstrated
a 10-pound, 10-horsepower prototype. Further research is expected to lead to
a substantial increase in energy conversion gain over the reported gain of
400 per cent. A 50-pound, 50-horsepower model (equivalent to a
250-horsepower gasoline-fueled engine) is currently being mounted in a
Chrysler New Yorker for testing. Its companion controller, which is required
to complete the resonant circuit for achieving over-unity gain, has been
designed. It is not known yet whether a separate on-board battery charger
will still be needed for a completely self-powered electric vehicle.

It should be noted that just because a motor can produce more mechanical
power than its electrical input power does not necessarily mean that it is
suitable for powering an electric vehicle. An electric vehicle motor ideally
should have a number of other characteristics such as reversibility,
complete variable power control, complete variable speed control, braking,
and stepping. It is understood that the perm-mag motor meets all performance
requirements for powering electric vehicles. It is not known how the
perm-mag motor specifically compares with other types of over-unity motors.

Minato Over-Unity Permanent Magnet Motor.

The Minato motor (US Patent 5,594,289) is a bicycle wheel-like disk that is
self-starting and self-rotating. On one half of the disk is mounted a
counter weight comprising of a single curved piece of aluminum spanning 180
degrees. Each of the several individual magnets on the other half of the
wheel are slightly symmetric, crescent shaped, and nested. They are
magnetized end to end with their north poles pointing out.

The motor is actuated by using the energy of a battery to move the north
pole of a large permanent magnet (the drive magnet) towards the wheel. As
the drive magnet approaches within several inches of the wheel, the wheel
starts to spin. As the drive magnet is moved closer to the wheel, the wheel
spins faster. The particular orientation of the wheel when it is at rest
seems to have no effect on how rapidly the wheel starts to turn. When the
drive magnet is moved away from the wheel, it coasts rather quickly to a
stop.

In May 1997, a working prototype was demonstrated at the First
International New Energy Conference in Seoul, Korea. It used 150 watts power
input and produced 450 watts output on a sustained basis. A December 1997
report, possibly not true, states that a large unit was being manufactured
in Japan that comprises of four connected 10-foot-long units that can power
30 homes. A smaller unit for powering individual homes has also been built.

An unimpressive summer 1998 Mexico City demonstration of a half-ton unit
showed an output of about one horsepower. This test result appears to show
that the horsepower per unit weight efficiency of the Minato motor is about
the same as one horsepower per horse.

Other Over-Unity Magnetic Motors.

There are several other types of magnetic motors claimed to have over-unity
energy conversion gain such as the ones that have been developed by Aspden,
Reed, Watson, Takahashi, Bergman, Johnson, Labine, and Marinov. For example,
Teruo Kawai of Tokyo, Japan recently obtained U.S. Patent 5,436,518 for his
"Motive Power Generating Device". The patent's key statement is as follows:
"Electric power of 19.55 watts was applied to the electromagnets at 17 volts
and 1.15 amperes.  . an output of 62.16 watt was obtained." Dividing the
output power by the input power yields an efficiency of 318 per cent.
However, as stated above for the perm-mag motor, such motors may not
necessarily have all the characteristics needed for powering electric
vehicles. Power gain measurements also can be tricky.

COMPRESSED AIR-DRIVEN AIR CONDITIONER/HEATER

Alvin Snaper has patented a compressed air-driven air conditioner/heater. It
relies on the principle of a vortex tube. Air whirled in a vortex tube
separates with the cold air molecules collecting in one portion of the tube,
and the warm air molecules collecting in another portion of the tube. The
cold air is expelled from one end of the tube, and the warm air is expelled
from the other end. It can be switched between providing 90 per cent cold
air and 10 per cent warm air, or 10 per cent cold air and 90 per cent warm
air.

The metal tube is about a foot long and a half-inch in diameter with a
two-inch long compressed air intake tube perpendicularly attached about
three inches from one end. The intake compressed air requirement
specifications are 7 CFM at 40 PSI. The volume of air expelled is twice that
of a refrigerant-type automobile air conditioner while requiring only
one-fourth the horsepower. Also, no warm-up period is required as with
conventional air conditioners or heaters. Its efficiency is nearly 30 per
cent.

The vehicle would have a redundant pair (for increased reliability) of air
compressors for pressurizing the vehicle's tubular frame which would also
serve as a storage chamber. The heavy (no fuel economy requirement) and
strong (for safety) tubular frame would help distribute compressed air to
the power steering, power brakes, power seats, power windows, windshield
wipers, door locks, air conditioner/heater, and a computer-controlled air
ride suspension system.

CONTINUOUS CLIMATE-CONTROL SYSTEM

Since the vehicle's on-board super-capacitor/battery charger is expected to
keep the super-capacitor/batteries charged even while the vehicle is parked,
the vehicle's interior temperature could be thermostatically controlled at a
comfortable room temperature 24 hours per day, seven days a week regardless
of the exterior temperature.

LOW-TEMPERATURE DIAMOND COATINGS

Durability would be enhanced by coating parts such as shock absorbers with
diamond using a new nondestructive low-temperature coating process which
also was patented by Alvin Snaper.

ADVANCED COMPUTER-CONTROLLED SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

Computer-controlled hydraulic shock absorbers as well as the
computer-controlled air ride suspension system would be supplied by Aimrite
Systems International, Inc., which owns the patents. Aimrite's
Computer-Optimized Adaptive Suspension Technology (COAST) system replaces a
vehicle's conventional shock absorbers with specially designed hydraulic
shock absorbers. The COAST system utilizes a sophisticated computer and
position sensors to monitor the vehicle's level at each corner. The
computer's microprocessor checks the sensors 240 times per second and
optimally regulates the damping on all four shocks based on this input. The
firmware used in the microprocessor is patented and represents the most
important element in the COAST system. It controls nine dynamic and static
parameters of motion (roll, pitch, sprung natural frequency, unsprung
natural frequency, pumping down, stored energy, topping out, bottoming out,
and height).

The COAST system is not only totally automatic, but it monitors and controls
the vehicle's ride performance on a continuous basis providing soft and
stable ride characteristics at all times as needed. The ride is comparable
to active systems without the need for pumps nor high-speed servo-valves.

Each shock absorber is actually a complementary pair of shock absorbers
mounted in opposing vertical compression/rebound modes. The computer sends
signals to valves to release pressure as required. Aimrite considers its
shock absorbers more durable and react faster than competing
computer-controlled shock absorbers which apply pressure when needed.  A
built-in safety factor is that if the computer fails, the result is
conventional damper operation, and failure of an individual damper is
equivalent to failure of a conventional shock absorber.

Aimrite's air ride suspension system replaces a vehicle's front coil springs
and rear leaf springs.  The air suspension comprises of a high-quality
control subsystem that includes the aforementioned dual redundant air
compressors, air dryers and filters, position sensors, computer-controlled
solenoid valves, and a dashboard-mounted control to ensure proper operation
and a long and reliable life of the air suspension in all weather and
driving conditions. While stopped or driving, the control subsystem allows
the operator to easily maintain the correct ride height under all loading
conditions. For example, the chassis can be raised for a bumpy ride and
lowered for stable highway driving. The vehicle body is automatically
leveled at all four corners, even when parked on an uneven surface.

Aimrite's suspension provides a full air suspension ride, with increased
comfort and control. Built-in safety capabilities are provided that
virtually eliminate traditional problems associated with air ride suspension
systems.

Combining Aimrite's two computer-controlled suspension systems would offer a
luxurious ride with sports-car control and additional features at a
reasonable price.

MONOCOQUE (UNIBODY) BASALT/CARBON FIBER FOAM BODY/FRAME

Developed by the I. N. Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials
Science, Kiev, Ukraine, basalt/carbon fiber foam is extremely strong yet
lighter than fiberglass. Test vehicle made with basalt/carbon fiber foam
parts was only vehicle ever tested that can cut through a cast-iron London
taxicab in a collision.

MARKETING

By combining these superb new technologies into an advanced self-powered
electric car that would be superior to any other car even envisioned, it is
evident that it should not be very difficult to sell a reasonably priced car
which would offer the following features:

Continuous climate control even while parked.

Computer-controlled luxurious ride with sports-car control and automatic
leveling even while parked.

Powerful but quiet and emission-free electric motor.

Much less hassle with bothersome and costly maintenance such as oil changes,
tune-ups, etc.

No dangerous gas tank taking up space.

Only a few maintenance-free lifetime environmentally benign
super-capacitors/batteries.

Heavy pressurized tubular frame and basalt/carbon fiber foam body for
increased safety.

And, above all, never requires refueling nor electricity recharging.

(Gary C. Vesperman, Henderson, Nevada)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shelburne John W DLPC
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 1:08 PM
> To: 'Strategic_Plan@...'
> Cc: Ramey R A (Tony) DLPC
> Subject: Submission to Strategic Plan 2000
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Please consider the following news headline:
>
> PANGNIRTUNG, Nunavut (Reuters) - He may be only a hunter in Canada's
> remote Arctic, but Steven Kooneeliusie certainly knows as much about the
> practical effects of global warming as any environmental scientist.  He
> and the other Inuit whose job it is to brave snow and ice to find caribou,
> seal and other animals say the signs of a gradual increase in temperature
> are everywhere.  ``When I went hunting years ago I used to wear a
> full-length caribou skin coat, but now I just wear a light parka. It is so
> hot these days my snowmobile often overheats,'' Kooneeliusie said in the
> small town of Pangnirtung, some 1,500 miles north of Ottawa nearly on the
> Arctic Circle.  ``We're seeing animals here we've never seen before, and
> last year I spotted a swan. The sun is very hot, too hot. For the first
> time ever people are actually getting sunburned.''  While arguments rage
> about whether global warming is primarily caused by pollution, the effects
> on the ground are all too real in the Arctic. One of the best places to
> observe them is the new territory of Nunavut, home to 27,000 people dotted
> across 750,000 square miles.  ``The effect that global warming is causing
> in Nunavut today is being felt by a lot of people, especially those who
> travel outside of communities, both hunters and campers,'' Sustainable
> Development Minister Peter Kilabuk said.  Kilabuk, based in the Nunavut
> capital Iqaluit, grew up in Pangnirtung and has seen for himself the
> changes in the fjord that the town sits on.  ``I know when I was probably
> 8 or 10 the ice wouldn't go out until July, sometimes not until the second
> week of July. But over the last few years we've seen the ice go out as
> early as May,'' he said. ``To us the effects are real. Climate change is
> here and it's a real cause for concern.''
>
>  I think a reasonable person would agree that it is time to beat the
> bushes to find alternate energy sources that do not involve combustion of
> hydrocarbons or nuclear reactions.
>
>  I believe that an answer, God knows, is out there. We as a
> government should have the courage and integrity to embrace a solution.
> This should be fairly researched with input allowed from any source that
> wants to respond, as I have. Most importantly, the submissions must be
> fairly evaluated and be acceptable to the largest majority of American
> citizens and the rest of the world. The environment provides sustenance
> for all of us regardless of national boundaries. In this spirit of
> equality for everyone, we must evaluate possible solutions for elimination
> pollution to the biosphere.
>
>  I have worked for the U. S. Navy for ten years as a civil service
> mechanical engineer. Since 1993, I have investigated on a
> not-to-interfere, unfunded basis alternative sources of energy and
> ultra-high technology. These possible technologies offer unique solutions
> to intractable problems we face in providing the Navy with efficient
> solutions.
>
>  Here is a list of scientists and inventors who I strongly believe
> can demonstrate the practicality of clean-energy technology:
>
>  1.) H.E. Puthoff, Ph. D., theoretical basis for practical extraction
> and use of "Zero-Point Energy (ZPE),"
>  2.) Harold Aspden, Ph. D., workable, simplified theoretical approach
> to extraction of ZPE and anti-gravity,
>  3.) Paulo Correa, Ph. D., patented, functional "Over-Unity
> Coefficient Of Performance (COP > 1)"  ZPE extraction device,
>  4.) Randall Mills, Ph. D., patented and functional COP > 1 energy
> production from "below ground state" hydrogen atoms,
>  5.) James Griggs, functional COP > 1" steam generator,
>  6.) John Bedini & T. E. Bearden, COP > 1 battery power supply,
>  7.) Takahashi; Kawai; Minato, COP > 1 electromagnetic engines
> (over-unity electric motors),
>  8.) Perfect Science Company, Turkey, remediation of existing
> super-fund class toxic waste problems.
>
>  I hope this submission and list will be evaluated fairly. I will
> stake my reputation and job on the validity of this submission.
>
>  I gave a briefing to the Pentagon Office of The Joint Chiefs J-6 for
> C4I on ultra-high technology electromagnetic applications in 1996. I know
> from talking with management officials in DARPA, ONR and NRL that these
> people recognize the reality of practical Zero-Point Energy extraction.
> The political climate was not right to talk about this in public, so their
> comments have to remain off the record. It is my most earnest wish that
> The DOE Strategic Plan staff will recognize ALL possible sources of
> non-polluting energy and begin a vigorous effort to research and develop
> these. Our environment which supports all of us is threatened. Let's be
> honest in doing something about the environmental problem.
>
> Very Sincerely,
> John Shelburne, Mechanical Engineer,
> Coastal Systems Station, NSWC - DD
>
>
> John Shelburne
> (850) 234-4485
> ShelburneJW@...
>

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@...>
Subject: Bearden, CSETI, free energy, French UFO report, black programs
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:56 PM

Jack,

I have excerpted for review some segments of CSETI website referenced by
Bearden in his DOE Strategic Plan public comments.  The site includes a page
with Greer's last email to you that I saw among your posts last August, and
a summary of the French UFO report I have inserted at the last 2/3 of this
post starting with
=========================== on the left margin.

http://www.cseti.org/position/greer/sarfatti.htm
Dr. Greer's response to physicist Jack Sarfatti's questions
(from private List discussion)  11 August 1999 [no quotes excerpted below]


"The greatest environmental challenge of the new century is global warming.
The scientists tell us the 1990s were the hottest decade of the entire
millennium. If we fail to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, deadly
heat waves and droughts will become more frequent, coastal areas will flood,
and economies will be disrupted. That is going to happen, unless we act."

PRESIDENT WILLIAM J. CLINTON
STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS

U.S. Capitol
Washington, D.C.
January 27, 2000


The main CSETI page is a long list of links and quotes starting at
http://www.cseti.org
(a few excerpts out of order sequence below , many are hyperlinks to more)

"If secrecy continues much longer, the earth's ecosystem will collapse."

Creating an Inertial Field (Anti-Gravity)
"By this means, an inertial spacedrive can be built."

In a 1988 experiment, an unconventional solid-state vacuum triode developed
by the late Floyd Sweet continuously discharged 1,200,000 times more
electrical power than was fed into it.  It also exhibited anti-gravity
properties.  It is but one of many such "over-unity" devices never to see
mass development.  This technology for extracting free energy from the
vacuum has been well understood by a High Cabal for around a century, and
this is the same energy that powers ET craft.  The suppression and
weaponization of this knowledge and its associated technologies, essential
for civilization's enlightened advancement, is the root cause of the
secrecy, lies and disinformation about the UFO subject.

The Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, the only
worldwide organization dedicated to establishing peaceful and sustainable
relations with extraterrestrial life forms.

CSETI was founded in 1990 by Dr. Steven M. Greer, who is the International
Director.
CSETI has two primary goals:

  Establish a real-time diplomatic and research initiative to contact
extraterrestrial civilizations, leading to a sustainable, peaceful and
mutually beneficial relationship, and

  Educate all sectors of human society about this subject in a credible and
non-harmful manner


86% believe aliens friendly   ---  Associated Press Poll
"We know of no knowledgeable insiders who regard the ET's as a hostile
threat."
- Dr. Greer


NBC's "Dateline" interviews Col. Corso:
What is not in any of the so-called UFO literature about the crashed Roswell
craft?
How the crashed craft was attempting to repair the damage itself.

"The Philadelphia Experiment"
Contemporaneous account of inadvertent time travel by Navy minesweeper and
crew  in 1944 by GE Engineer who was working on the boat at the time.  Col.
Corso says
" ... the project continued and has progressed greatly since then."


What you will not find in any of the UFO "literature" or being discussed by
any UFO researcher other than by Dr. Greer:
Any reference to ET communication systems.
Why?
Because they interface directly with thought, and the back-engineered
technology has been taken deep black for military and psychological warfare
purposes (see above) - virtually all other "UFO researchers" on the
"official circuit" follow their scripted "revelations" and stay well clear
of the Holy Grail of Ufology
The real reason that Area 51 is known as "Dreamland"


Congress, all of whose Members have sworn an oath to protect the
Constitution, ignore felonious Black Projects, and allow ET-derived
technologies to remain locked up in covert weapons systems, inaccessible to
reverse degradation of the biosphere or improve the lot of mankind.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
U.S. Defence Secretary Cohen expresses concern about eco-terrorism using
scalar electromagnetic weapons:

"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby
they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through
the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds
out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon
other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify
our [counterterrorism] efforts."
----Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism
conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn.

Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at
the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy,
University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------


"The attitude of the U.S. is seen as "most strange" since the 1947 wave and
the Roswell event. Since that time, a policy of increasing secrecy seems to
have been applied, which might be explained by the protection at all cost of
military technological superiority to be acquired from the study of UFOs."

Astronaut and Cosmonaut UFO sightings
includes Astronaut Gordon Cooper describing his UFO sighting

Photos of UFOs taken by second Russian in Space

Cosmonaut Victor Afanasyev describes the structured craft that tracked his
spaceship while in orbit

Astronaut Catherine "Cady" Coleman alerts Mission Control about a UFO on
Shuttle Mission STS-73

Apollo 16 Moon Mission UFOs described by ex-NASA scientist

The Physics of Metaphysics

Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (ret.) discusses scalar electromagnetics, one of the
core technologies that  scientifically explains the real physics behind many
so-called paranormal and ET events.  Purged from all textbooks for almost a
century, this "missing" section of electromagnetic theory has been taken
"deep black" for the worst possible uses.  Sadly for humanity, the
beneficial uses, such as free energy production, disease reversal,  healing
etc., have been ruthlessly suppressed.

"...More highly classified than the Hydrogen Bomb"

E.T. Whittaker's seminal papers on the subject were written in 1903 and 1904
and the foundations laid by Nikola Tesla over 100 years ago!

Not to mention the back-engineering from downed ET craft.


What´s NEW

Last updated April 13th

Secrets of Bedini Over-Unity Battery
  Transcription of Canadian scientist Wilbert Smith's 1961 Vancouver lecture
on Project Magnet technological assistance from "the boys from topside"

RealVideo - Apollo 16 Moon Mission UFOs described by ex-NASA scientist

RealVideo - the Belgian UFO flap
  Sketches of Flying Triangle off California coast

Photos of UFOs taken by second Russian in Space
  Real Video - Astronaut "Cady"Coleman identifies UFO on Shuttle Mission
STS-73


Get ready for "Mad Max" if Free Energy systems are not released from Covert
Projects


=============================French UFO Report:

http://www.cseti.org/overview/french%20ufo%20study.htm

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 16:17:23 -0400
From: DOMINIQUE WEINSTEIN

Subject: French UFO report

Dr. Richard Haines

To: "Richard F. Haines" <dhaines@...>
Peter Sturrock <Sturrock@...>

Dear Dick and Peter,

I have sent you last week a copy of a recently released UFO report written
unofficially and privately by a group (COMETA) of High ranking military and
civilian French officials. It was given confidentially a few months ago to
your President and Prime Minister.

I forwarded to you the following English summary of this report written by
the French UFO author Gildas Bourdais.

Very best wishes,

Dominique Weinstein

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


The French Report on UFOs and Defense: a short presentation by Gildas
Bourdais

It must be stressed here that this is an independent report, by a private
association called COMETA. It is summarized with the approval of the
authors. To translate and publish the report itself, in part or in its
entirety, permission should be asked by writing to the administrator of the
association COMETA, Mr Michel Algrin, 25, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75005
Paris, France.

On Friday 16 of July 1999 was published in France an outstanding Document,
called "UFOs and Defense. What must we be prepared for?" ("Les OVNI et la
Defense. A quoi doit-on se preparer ?")

This ninety pages report is the result of an in depth study of UFOs,
covering many aspects of the subject, especially questions of defense. The
study was carried out during several years by an independent group of former
"auditors" at the very serious Institute of Higher Studies for National
Defense, or IHEDN ("Institute des hautes Ètudes de defense nationale"), and
of qualified experts from various fields. Before its public release, it has
been sent to French President of the Republic Jacques Chirac, and to Prime
Minister Lionel Jospin.

This Report is prefaced by General Bernard Norlain, of the Air Force, former
Director of IHEDN, and it begins with a preamble by Andre Lebeau, former
President of the National Center for Space Studies ("Centre national
d'Ètudes spatiales", CNES), the French equivalent of NASA. The group itself,
collective author of the report, is an association of experts, many of whom
are or have been auditors of IHEDN, and it is presided over by General Denis
Letty, of the Air Force, former auditor (FA) of IHEDN. Its name "COMETA"
stands for "Committee for in depth studies".

A non exhaustive list of members is given at the beginning, and it is
impressive enough. It includes: General Bruno Lemoine, of the Air Force (FA
of IHEDN), Admiral Marc Merlo (FA of IHEDN). Michel Algrin, Doctor in
Political Sciences, attorney at law (FA of IHEDN), General Pierre Bescond,
engineer for armaments (FA of IHEDN), Denis Blancher, Chief National Police
superintendent at the Ministry of the Interior, Christian Marchal, chief
engineer of the national "corps des Mines", Research Director at the
"National Office of Aeronautical Research" (ONERA), General Alain Orszag,
Phd in physics, engineer for armaments.

The committee also expresses its gratitude to outside contributors, among
whom: Jean-Jacques Velasco, head of SEPRA at CNES, Franaois Louange,
President of Fleximage, specialist of photo analysis, General Joseph
Domange, of the Air Force, general delegate of the Association of auditors
at IHEDN.

General Norlain tells in a short preface how this committee was created.
General Letty came to see him in March 1995, when he was Director of IHEDN,
to discuss his project of committee on UFOs. Norlain assured him of his
interest and addressed him to the Association of Auditors (AA) of IHEDN,
which in turn gave him its support. It is interesting to recall here that,
twenty years ago, it was a report of that same Association which led to the
creation of GEPAN, the first unit for UFO study, at CNES.

As a result, several members of the committee come from the Association of
Auditors of IHEDN, joined by other experts. Most of them hold, or have held,
important functions in defense, industry, teaching, research, or various
central administrations. General Norlain expresses hope that this report
will help develop new efforts nationally, and an indispensable international
cooperation.

General Letty, as president of COMETA, points to the main theme of the
report, which is that the accumulation of well documented observations
compels us now to consider all hypotheses as to the origin of UFOs,
especially extraterrestrial hypotheses.

The committee then presents the contents of the study:

In a first part, presentation of some remarkable cases, both French and
foreign; In a second part, they describe the present organization of
research in France and abroad, and studies made by scientists worldwide
which may bring partial explanations, in accordance with known laws of
physics. The main global explanations are then reviewed, from secret crafts
to extraterrestrial manifestations; In a third part, will be examined
measures to be taken regarding defense, from information of pilots, both
civilian and military, to strategic, political and religious consequences,
should the extraterrestrial hypothesis be confirmed.


Part I : "Facts and Testimonies"

Many of the cases selected are well known by most researchers, and need only
to be mentioned here. They are:

Testimonies of French pilots. M. Giraud, pilot of MirageIV (1977); Colonel
Bosc, fighter pilot (1976); Air France flight AF 3532 (Jan 1994).

Aeronautical cases worldwide. Lakenheath (1956); RB-47 (1957); Teheran
(1976); Russia (1990); San Carlos de Bariloche (Argentina, 1995).

Observations from the ground. Tananarive (1954); observation of a saucer
near the ground by a French pilot, J.-P. Fartek (1979); observation at close
range over a Russian missile site, by several witnesses (1989).

Close encounters in France. Valensole (Maurice Masse, 1965); Cussac, Cantal
(1967); Trans-en-Provence (1981); Nancy (so-called case of the "Amaranth"
1982).
Counter-examples of elucidated phenomena (two cases).

Although the selection is limited, it seems to be sufficient to convince an
uninformed but open-minded reader of the reality of UFOs.


Part II: "The Present State of Knowledge"

The second part, entitled "the present state of knowledge" ("Le point des
connaissances"), begins with a survey of the organization of the official
UFO research in France, from the first intructions given to the
"gendarmerie" in 1974 for the redaction of reports, to the creation of GEPAN
in 1977, its organization and its results: collection of more than 3,000
reports from the gendarmerie, cases studies, statistical analyses. It then
surveys agreements passed by GEPAN and, later, SEPRA, with the air force and
the army, the civilian aviation and other organs, such as civilian and
military laboratories for the analysis of samples, and photographs.

Regarding the methods and results, we are reminded of some famous cases
(Trans-en-Provence, l'Amarante), and emphasis is made on the the catalogues
of cases, notably of pilots (Weinstein catalogue), and "radar/visual", world
wide. A historical note appears here with a quotation of the famous letter
of General Twining, of September 1947, asserting already to the reality of
UFOs.

The following chapter, called "hypotheses and attempts at modeling" ("OVNI :
hypotheses, essais de modelisation") discusses some models and hypotheses
which are under study in several countries. Partial simulations have already
been made for UFO propulsion, based on observations of aspects such as:
speed, movements and accelerations, engine failure of nearby vehicles,
paralysis of witnesses. One model is MHD propulsion, already tested
successfully in water, and which might be achieved in the atmosphere with
superconducting circuits, in a few decades. Other studies are briefly
mentioned, regarding both atmospheric and space propulsion, such as particle
beams, antigravity, reliance on planetary and stellar impulsion. The failure
of land vehicle engines may be explained by microwave radiations. In fact,
high power hyperfrequency generators are under study in France and other
countries. One application is microwave weapons. Particle beams, for
instance proton beams, which ionize the air and become therefore visible,
might explain the observation of truncated luminous beams. Microwaves might
explain body paralysis.

In the same chapter are next studied "global hypotheses". Hoaxes are rare
and easily detected. Some non-scientific are put aside, such as conspiracies
and manipulation by very secret, powerful groups, parapsychic phenomena,
collective hallucinations. The hypothesis of secret weapons is also regarded
as very improbable, the same as "intoxication" at the time of the cold war,
or just natural phenomena. We are then left with various extraterrestrial
hypotheses. One version has been developed in France by astronomers
Jean-Claude Ribes and Guy Monnet, based on the concept of "space islands" of
American physicist O'Neill, and it is compatible with present day physics.

The organization of UFO research in the United States, Great Britain and
Russia, is surveyed rapidly. In the United States, the media and the polls
show a marked interest and concern of the public, but the official position,
especially of the Air Force, is still one of denial, more precisely that
there is no threat to national security. Actually, declassified documents,
released under FOIA, show another story, one of surveillance of nuclear
installations by UFOs, and the continued study of UFOs by the military and
intelligence agencies.

The report stresses the importance, in the United States, of private,
independent associations. It mentions the "Briefing Document. Best available
evidence" sent in 1995 to a thousand personalities worldwide, and the
Sturrock workshop in 1997, both sponsored by Laurance Rockefeller. The
"Briefing Document" has obviously been welcomed by the authors of the COMETA
report. The committee also notes the public emergence of alleged insiders
such as Colonel Philip Corso, and considers that his testimony may be partly
significant as to the real situation in that country, in spite of many
critics.

The report describes briefly the situation in Great Britain, with a special
mention for Nick Pope, and poses the question of the possible existence of
secret studies pursued jointly with American services. It mentions as well
research in Russia, and the release of some information, notably by the KGB
in 1991.


Part III: UFOs and Defense

The third part, "UFOs and Defense" ("Les OVNI et la defense"), states that,
if it is true that no hostile action has been proved yet, at least some
actions of "intimidation" have been recorded in France (case of the Mirage
IV for instance). Since the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs cannot be ruled
out, it is therefore necessary to study the consequences of that hypothesis
at the strategic level, but also political, religious and media/public
information levels.

The first chapter of Part III is devoted to prospective strategies
("Prospectives strategiques") and it begins with fundamental questions :
"What if extraterrestrials? What intentions and what strategy can we deduce
from their behavior?"

Such questions open a more controversial part of the report. Possible
motivations of extraterrestrial visitors are explored here, such as
protection of planet Earth against the dangers of nuclear war, suggested for
instance by repeated flying over nuclear missile sites.

The committee then ponders the possible repercussion on the behavior,
official or not, of different states, and focuses on the possibility of
secret, privileged contacts which might be "attributed to the United
States". The attitude of the U.S. is seen as "most strange" since the 1947
wave and the Roswell event. Since that time, a policy of increasing secrecy
seems to have been applied, which might be explained by the protection at
all cost of military technological superiority to be acquired from the study
of UFOs.

Next, the report tackles the question: "What measures must we take now?" At
the least, whatever the nature of UFOs, they impose "critical vigilance", in
particular regarding the risk of "destabilizing manipulations". A kind of
"cosmic vigilance" should be applied by the elites, nationally and
internationally, in order to prevent any shocking surprise, erroneous
interpretation and hostile manipulation.

Nationally, COMETA urges the strengthening of SEPRA, and recommends the
creation of a cell at the highest level of government, entrusted with the
development of hypotheses, strategy, and preparation of cooperation
agreements with European and other foreign countries. A further step would
be that European States and the European Union undertake diplomatic action
toward the Unites States within the framework of political and strategic
alliances.

A key question of the report is "What situations must we be prepared for?".
It mentions such situations as: extraterrestrial move for official contact;
discovery of a UFO/alien base on the territory or in Europe; invasion
(deemed improbable) and localized or massive attack; manipulation or
deliberate disinformation aiming at destabilizing other states.

COMETA devotes special attention to "aeronautical implications", with
detailed recommendations aimed at various personnel, such as air staffs,
controllers, weathermen and engineers. It also makes recommendations at the
scientific and technical levels, aimed at developing research, with
potential benefits for defense and industry.

The report further explores the political and religious implications of
UFOs, using as a model the perspective of our own exploration of space: how
would we do it, how would we handle contacts with less advanced
civilizations?

Such an approach is not new to the well informed readers of the abundant
ufological literature, but it has a special value here, being treated
seriously at such a level. The media/publicity implications are not
forgotten, with the problems of disinformation, fear of ridicule, and
manipulation by certain groups.

In its conclusion, COMETA claims that the physical reality of UFOs, under
control of intelligent beings, is "quasi certain". Only one hypothesis takes
into account the available data: the hypothesis of extraterrestrial
visitors. This hypothesis is of course unproved, but has far-reaching
consequences. The goals of these alleged visitors remain unknown but must be
the subject of speculations and prospective scenarios.


In its final recommendations, it stresses again the need to:

Inform all decision-makers and persons in position of responsibility;

Reinforce means of investigation and study at SEPRA;

Have UFO detection taken into account by agencies engaged in of space
surveillance;

Create a strategic cell at the highest state level;

Undertake diplomatic action toward the Unites States for cooperation on this
"capital question";

Study measures which might be necessary in case of emergencies.


Finally, this document is accompanied by seven interesting annexes which are
worth reading even by seasoned ufologists:

Radar detection in France

Observations by astronomers

Life in the Universe

Colonization of space

The Roswell case - The disinformation (an interesting text which will be
criticized by some readers, and welcomed by others, including myself)

Antiquity of the UFO phenomenon. Elements for a chronology.

Reflection on various psychological, sociological and political aspects of
the UFO phenomenon.

The importance of this report should not be missed by all informed
ufologists around the world, considering not only its contents but the
personality of its authors, and in spite of critics which may be addressed
to it. In fact, some sharp critics have been made soon after the release of
the report, on the Internet, and in the French press with an article by
sociologist Pierre Lagrange curiously denouncing an operation of
disinformation by way of ridiculing the subject ("Liberation of July 21,
1999). Let's hope that the present summary will help clarify the debate.

Gildas Bourdais

======================================

CSETI
Coordinator - Memberships, Trainings, Orders
Debbie Foch
coordinator@...
P.O. Box 4556
Largo, MD 20775 USA
Phone: 1-888-ET-CSETI (1-888-382-7384) or 1-301-249-3915
Fax: 1-877-92-CSETI (1-877-922-7384) or 1-650-373-2675

International Director
Steven M. Greer MD
webmaster@...
PO Box 265
Crozet VA 22932-0265
Fax: 540-456-8303

Media Representative
Martin Keller
kelmart@...
5001 Bloomington Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 56417 USA
Phone: 612-729-8585
Fax: 612-721-5278

Website Administration
Tony Craddock
webmaster@...


================================end CSETI site excerpts for:


Science in Society and Public Policy list archives at
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams


David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html
Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts

USCampaign:   Williams-Peltier for US Pres/VP
gear2000@...
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

The Vision of Paradise on Earth
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

**Support HR 2545:
Global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
Details & Email:  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm
Sign letters to senators  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate
and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter

Easy index to email Congress & Media
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd
(copy & paste email letters to media and Congress)

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Bob Emond" <Bob.Emond@...>
Cc: <Bill.Kennedy@...>; <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: DOE Strategic Plan Apr24 extension, deadline for public comments
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:52 PM

Bob,

Thank you very much for this advice of extension of DOE Strategic Plan Draft
public comments deadline until April 24th on which date I will send my final
comments with composite of suggestions from some of my colleagues from whom
I have requested same to be copied to me as per below post of this morning.
At end of this post I have appended some interesting philosophical
evaluations of implications of data already submitted from feedback by one
among my network who seems to have some grasp of economic implications of
the new clean Emerging Energy Industry that I alluded to in my prior
submissions dated Apr7 and Apr10.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Emond" <Bob.Emond@...>
To: <gear2000@...>
Cc: <Bill.Kennedy@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000


> Thank you for your note.  We agree to extend the comment period for your
comments to April 24, 2000.
>
> In pursuit of our goal to seek public comment we issued a press release
February 24, 2000; notified our key stakeholders and other key interest
groups (approximately 1400) by mail; placed a notice on the DOE homepage for
the duration of the comment period; and used other public forums (for
example the newsletter you received).  The success of our outreach is
measured in part by the several thousand downloads of the draft plan on our
web-site.  In this number are several hundred visits by the public which
were simply not possible until the recent availability of this technology.
>
> The Comprehensive National Energy Strategy of 1998 is fully integrated
into the draft plan.  Anyone who contributed to that public process has
already made significant contributions to the draft plan.  We have a
continuing interest in your comments and look forward to your response by
April 24.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob
>

===============

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: ".GeneralAgencyServices" <gear2000@...>
Subject: DOE Strategic Plan Apr24 extension, deadline for public comments
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:31 PM

A boon for "Clean Energy Now!" Campaign?:

To my surprise, my request for extension of deadline for submission of
public comments on DOE Strategic Plan draft has been granted via below email
this morning from DOE extending public comments deadline to April 24, 2000.

This is a unique window of opportunity to submit to DOE, and via plan below
for the public record accessible via internet to anyone including media and
political candidates, your suggestions for changes in DOE strategy in the
21st Century regarding energy policies and priorities;  nuclear power,
weapons, and waste, National security considerations, DOE research in
forefront sciences of many kinds, etc.

The Strategic Plan draft may be viewed at http://www.doe.gov/strategic_plan
and your public comments submissions to Strategic_Plan@... should
also be copied for the public record and referencing in this writer's final
public comments submission of April 24, 2000, per deadline extension offered
in below post, to ensure best DOE and public consideration of your input.

Although this extension seems to be specifically directed to me (perhaps due
to my complaint that as a commenter on DOE Comprehensive National Energy
Strategy (CNES) of 1998 I was not notified of prior 31Mar deadline for
comments on Strategic Plan except by coincidental receipt of third party
forwarding on Apr7 about deadline's prior extension to Apr 10), I will
reference/include in my Apr 24 submission all postings copied (cc) to
strategic-plan@egroups.com which list archive I set up this morning so
submissions copied to it may also be viewed by the public on an ongoing
basis at http://www.egroups.com/group/strategic-plan

If you have already copied to me re: public comments submissions on DOE
Strategic Plan emailed before today, I have forwarded them to list above
where my submissions of Apr7 and Apr 10 are also already posted.

This additional time until April 24th may offer chance for additional
significant and valuable ideas/inputs.

David Crockett Williams
Science in Society and Public Policy list
http://www.egroups.com/group/dcwilliams
(my DOE Strategic Plan submissions* to date are also at this url)

-----------------------------next:


From: "Bob Emond" <Bob.Emond@...>
To: <gear2000@...>
Cc: <Bill.Kennedy@...>
Subject: Re: *by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:07 AM

Thank you for your [*]note.  We agree to extend the comment period for your
comments to April 24, 2000.

In pursuit of our goal to seek public comment we issued a press release
February 24, 2000; notified our key stakeholders and other key interest
groups (approximately 1400) by mail; placed a notice on the DOE homepage for
the duration of the comment period; and used other public forums (for
example the newsletter you received).  The success of our outreach is
measured in part by the several thousand downloads of the draft plan on our
web-site.  In this number are several hundred visits by the public which
were simply not possible until the recent availability of this technology.

The Comprehensive National Energy Strategy of 1998 is fully integrated into
the draft plan.  Anyone who contributed to that public process has already
made significant contributions to the draft plan.  We have a continuing
interest in your comments and look forward to your response by April 24.

Thanks

Bob

===================


David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000
<signature lines snipped>

----------------------------------next:


From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Strategic-Plan" <strategic-plan@egroups.com>
Subject: 12Apr DCW: Philosophical Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:50 AM

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DCWilliams" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: [dcwilliams] Philosophical Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:12 AM

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Bill"
Subject: Philosophical Comments on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 8:42 AM

Dear Bill,

I just wanted to thank you for taking the time from your busy work-a-day
schedule to offer your insightful comments on my initial response of Apr7 on
the DOE Strategic Plan2000.

I hope you will agree, after you have a chance to review my followup
comments on this Plan dated 10Apr, that we share similar philosphical views
on the ultimate direction that global societies need to take as these new
clean Emerging-Energy technologies come closer to imminent fruition.

I have interspersed a few comments on your response below and would like
your permission to forward your response to my appropriate lists as I think
your insights are worthy of serious consideration by several key people
involved in all this who come quickly to mind.  Not knowing if you want to
be "in the loop" on future discussions of related matters surely to come
resultant from such posts, unless or until I hear from you to the contrary I
will use this composite post for such purposes (including its supplemental
"post deadline" submission to Stategic__Plan@... because of
DOE's indicated commitment therein to fundamental research in
"matter/energy physics") omitting your full name and your email address.

In any case, I am quite intrigued by your uncommonly clear insights on some
of the key related principles connected to this matter and wonder if you
will send me a brief background info message on yourself, interests,
particular fields of study, etc., so that I may better consider the most
productive ways to collaborate with you more deeply in future.

With thanks,

David


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill"
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000


> David:
>
> Usually your messages are too long and have too many
> links for the limited time I have to ponder these
> topics.  There probably is no solution to this.  But,
> what this means is I am simply too busy to give all of
> this much thought or attention.  I have a routine life
> to maintain that involves my jobs, paying my bills,
> and keeping a roof over my head.
>
> But, the brief moments I have given to thinking about
> energy have given me the following thoughts:
>
> -The CONTROL of "Energy" is probably the number one
> driving force in global politics and economy.


It has sadly come to pass that those who control energy resources control
the ecomonic basis for politics and societies globally to the detriment of
the public in many cases.


> -This drive to CONTROL "Energy" is motivated by the
> desire for two things: 1) Political Power, and 2)
> Economic Dominance (money).
>
> -For the above reasons, controlling the world's energy
> resources is probably the number one cause of War,
> Famine, Genocide, etc.
>
> -When the world's energy needs were not so extreme as
> they are today, this driving force was Gold.
>
> -If Energy sources that are unencumbered by sovereign
> borders, patents, or corporate profit could be
> established and made practically and freely available
> to every human being on the planet, all of these
> factors would disappear.


Here you have clearly fingered the "National Security concerns" that
purportedly have suppressed this new science for at least the last two
decades of my study and perhaps the last 105 years since Tesla's Long Island
Power Plant was built and scuttled.

But, possibly this is THE key idea supportive of my convictions (since 1975
after reading The Roots of Consciousness by Jeffrey Mishlove discussing
theoretical physics being applied to new physics and cybernetics of
consciousness theories such as Dr. Jack Sarfatti's evolving post-quantum
physics of consciousness http://www.stardrive.org) that an adequate "Science
of Consciousness" can reconcile previously conflicting ideologies and allow
and empower the direct cause of true peace, harmony among all life and free
natural abundance as paradise on Earth, as per Hopi and other prophecy
fulfillment.  If your idea as expressed above were to be widely accepted and
utilized globally it may earn you a place in history of economic/political
philosophy on order of Karl Marx, Thomas Jefferson, et al.


> -The current controlling interests in global energy
> resources will savagely protect their "right" to
> continue to control both the distribution of energy
> and the world's economy as long as these resources are
> quantifiable as "fuel" based or a "product" that
> belongs to someone (earth bound resources, i.e.: coal,
> oil, water, etc.).
>
> -They will also fight to the death to establish their
> perceived right, or at least their patent power, to
> control future energy resources no matter where they
> originate (i.e.: solar energy, high density charge
> clusters, etc.)


This part I do not agree with because of what might be called a "self
limiting loop of understanding" wherein those who hold to present
power/dominance belief systems are automatically prevented from
understanding and accepting the validity of this new science and
technological applications of it, still therefore consider it "bunk" or
"junk science", and so usually ignore it as impracticable and unworthy of
their time.  There is a parallel in my experience between awakening of
innate human intelligence (ie, what might properly be called a "spiritual
reawakening") and one's ability to come to grips with the reality of this
new matter/energy/consciousness-Consciousness science (see O'Leary's Miracle
in the Void and Dr. Inomata's interpretations of this in terms of Qi or Chi
"energy").    As one's awakening expands and one can appreciate the reality
and truth behind this new knowledge, so also does an appreciation of the
interconnectedness (oneness) of all life become apparent and the
power/dominance syndrome fades from the Mind as a simple
misunderstanding of where the REAL power lies and
the nearly infinite possibilites of how its user is rewarded by applying it
for the benefit of "all Life" that the "awakened" human being then
understands how is connected to his/her "relative identity".

Herein I am delineating the concepts of,  {1} "mind" as used in post-quantum
physics of consciousness defined to be a property of matter itself and the
"configuration space" that has been previously conceptualized to understand
it in light of quantum physics anomalies and as distinguished from "Mind"
herein modified from my earlier writings uncapitalized to describe what in
most vocabularies/definitions applies to the "human mind" --- and of  {2}
"consciousness" as in the post-quantum physics theory usage to describe the
"back-action" on "mind"  (the mental field associated with matter
as a physical property of it) of "intent" applied on matter through "mind"
in this "strange mobius-like mind-matter-consciousness feedback loop", and
"Consciousness" as commonly used to describe the "human consciousness" as
almost universally used outside this new post-quantum physics of
consciousness discipline in such fields as psychology, neurosciences,
psychoimmunology, spiritual philosophies, etc.


> -We live in a global economy and political structure
> fueled by (pardon the pun) the control of earth-bound
> energy resources.  War translates to dollars for these
> controlling monopolies.
>
> -I am sure that the lack of "public outreach" is
> directly linked to the motivation to continue to keep
> control of the world's energy in the hands of the
> current energy monopolies.  The maintenance of
> "Control" and "Power" depend on keeping the public
> ignorant, and uninvolved.
>
> Because of all of this, I believe that the future of
> new energy technology needs to include the belief that
> energy belongs to everyone just as human genome
> information belongs to everyone.


Excellent point right on target to DOE Strategic Plan which, surprisingly to
me, also discusses DOE research collaboration on the human genome project.

Your comment here points to the reason why Dr. O'Leary's proposal is unique
among the many others who are still relying on "good ol' capitalism" as the
best tool.  Different from the original Manhattan Project, O'Leary's call
for a "New Manhattan Project" analog as a "crash program" to quickly finish
R&D evaluations of the many available emerging energy technologies is
clearly suggested as a global scale open free information exchange to
exploit this opportunity by all nations of the world simultaneously.

The only possible way this would be allowed to happen by the US National
Security Aparatus is if coincident with this plan we actually are able to
achieve global peace and harmony among the nations so that war itself and
preparations for war become permanently obsolete by some major changes in
the human and political conditions globally.

This sounds to most people as even more impossible than "free energy" but to
me they are simply two sides of the same new Science-of-Consciousness coin.


> As new energy technology is developed that does not
> rely on sources of quantifiable "earth bound" physical
> substances ("fuel") from within sovereign borders or
> private property, "patents," as they currently exist,
> should also be promoted as a thing of the past.
>
> "Ownership" (patents) of "energy" should be a globally
> unacceptable feature of international law.
>
> However, the new technology, has not been presented to
> the public in a fashion that is understandable or
> believable.  Until these new technologies can be
> presented in a way that the general public can at
> least understand the basic principles, there won't be
> a public buy-in to its promotion and development.
> Right now it is all too much like science fiction.


This is the challenge I have been facing in this area since my earliest,
1976, predictions of the advent of these "Tetronic Age" technologies.  At
that time I had not even heard of Nikola Tesla's work or anyone else who
thought that it was possible to develop the kinds of technologies I began
predicting then consequent to my Tetron hypothesis (TNUFT
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron.html) , i.e., fuel-less
["over-unity"] electric power generators, electro-gravi-magnetic
levitation vehicles, radioactivity decay rate accelerator, the water
transmitter, and advanced biomedical healing devices.

In the years since then, I read first about Tesla's work,
then met Bruce DePalma and through his network, and then later others,
started compiling a long list of various other researchers whose work seems
to support my predictions.

With the single exception of DePalma,
no scientist has yet told me that they understand my "theory", but it is
enough for me to know that so much work is "out there" that supports my
predictions which I feel will come to fruition quite rapidly after the right
"minds" come to grips with the simple but revolutionary basic concepts
of the Tetron Thesis which addresses THE fundamental crumbling cornerstone
of modern science since its inception with Galileo's empiricalism, i.e., the
notion that systems of reality under observation exist independently
reproducibly observable by all observers exclusive of variations in observer
identity (e.g., "belief systems", etc.) which are erroneously seen to have
no bearing on the nature of the physical dynamics of the system of reality
under observation.

The problem we face is that there is yet to be seen an adequate "theory", or
integrating explanation/terminology, that is widely accepted to describe the
various many different approaches to these new technologies which include
such labels as "homopolar (Faraday's term) overunity generators" such as
DePalma, Tewari, Inomata, et. al. (here "overunity" is used inclusively of
"incremental overunity" and "oveall overunity" anomalies observed for over
twenty years by various qualified experimentalists), "solid state
oscillating electomagnetic systems" such as Sparky Sweet and
Trombly-Farnsworth devices, Cold Fusion, High Density Charge Clusters, Low
Energy Nuclear Reactions, Low Energy Nuclear Transmutation, the rotating
magnetic/coil assembly of Joseph Newman (Newman Energy Machine) which he
claims converts matter to energy, the "hydrinos" of Mills' Blacklight Power
approach, etc., etc., etc., etc.

My best guess is that ultimately all these will be tied in to the Zero Point
Energy field referred to in my DOE comments of this year, and of 1998 when I
received the significant DOE letter of May'98 indicating their recent
position accepting 1997 verification/proof of the existence of ZPE and
indicating that a device to harness it would be considered the "Holy Grail
of energy research".

This is the arena (ZPE) where it may be easiest to relate the concepts to
the general public.  I will give below an historical overview from my
perspective as a chemist.

When I was studying chemistry at the California State University at
Northridge (then called San Fernando Valley State College), 1963-67, I was
considered by my teachers to be one of the better chemistry students to have
attended that school.  In a few of my chemistry and physics classes I was
the first person ever to consistently get 100% scores on tests.  I received
the first A grade in quantitative analysis ever given at that school, by a
hardnosed teacher I might add, even though the college did not yet have a
long history.

At that time the "accepted science" that had filtered down to the
college/university level taught us that as systems were cooled closer and
closer to absolute zero temperature it was measured that the "energy of the
system" got lower and lower and accepted theory at that time predicted that
at absolute zero temperature the motion of atoms and molecules would be such
that perhaps even the electrons of an atom would cease motion and their
orbits collapse.   Many years later I learned that in 1963 a prominent
theoretical physicist named John Archibald Wheeler did other calculations to
indicate that at absolute zero temperature the vacuum of empty space, the
space in which matter itself resides, possessed some kind of potential
energy field on the order of ten to the ninty-third power (10^93) grams per
cubic centimeter energy equivalent.  This energy field has come to be
understood as the Zero Point Energy field that is due to "quantum vacuum
fluctuations" which "cancel out" such that the question of how it might be
"harnessed" was largely ignored until the early 1980's when Adam Trombly
understood that DePalma's n-Machine overunity homopolar generator was
actually "tapping into" the ZPE and "liberating" some amount of it as usable
electricity.  From his understanding he quickly designed what he felt is an
improvement on the n-Machine design which he an a collaborator tested and
patented internationally as the "Trombly-Kahn Closed Path Homopolar
Generator".  By that time he had learned of a previously somewhat obscure
discovery of Michael Faraday from 1831 (then unknown to DePalma even though
he earlier taught electrical engineering at MIT) called the "homopolar
principle" (different than Faraday's discovery of the "induction principle"
first showing the connection of electricity and magnetism whereby
electricity is produced in a conductor from its motion in proximity to a
magnetic field).

So to open better public and more general scientific discussion and
understanding of this now very confusing and not-yet-well-understood new
clean-energy genre becoming known as Emerging Energy Technologies, I would
posit the hypothesis that all of these experimental technologies that are
actually viable (and we can be sure that many claims in this area will
ultimately prove false) are in some manner connected in their physics and
chemistry to interactions with this Zero Point Energy field, i.e., in some
way "harnessing" this "space power" (Tewari) extant in the space in which
matter resides.

My zen buddhist monk friend Yamato sees this as related to the "zero energy"
descriptive of the "emptiness" of the "void" object of zazen sitting
meditation yielding Buddha's "enlightenment" and we have received supportive
feedback on this line of investigation from the office of HH Dalai Lama as
well.

Yes, presently it sounds like science fiction to the lay public, but then so
did the airplane, submarine, travel to the moon, etc., not so many years in
human history before these things actually manifested.


> The removal of the risk of patent infringement from
> the equation will greatly enhance the chances of more
> rapid success in promoting the development of new
> energy technology.
>
> One might argue that this would also remove one of the
> major motivators, money, from the equation as well and
> that if developers couldn't control the rights of
> their developments they wouldn't expend the costs
> necessary for development.


Yes, you have hit the nail on the head here.   The concept you are dealing
with in this part is exactly the answer to the most frequently asked
question about these new technologies which first came to light twenty years
ago, i.e., "if this is true then why have these new energy technologies
not already reached the market?"


> In response to that argument, I would ask the
> following question:  "Has the money for development of
> new energy technology up until now come from large
> investors expecting a return on their investment based
> on profits generated from patents?"  If so, someone
> better investigate the real sources of these funds.
> If not, then perhaps it proves that the technology
> could be developed and refined without the control of
> outside big money investors who present the risk of
> controlling the resulting technology.
>
> If the latter is true, it may also be true that the
> elimination of the competition for the patents might
> up the developers to freely exchange the technology
> for more rapid refinement to the ultimate benefit of
> the world's people.


Two present approaches seem on the cusp of success right now but it
remains to be seen if "the awakening" I mention above will take effect among
the principals in time to prevent their otherwise certain failure following
past two decades precedents.  One is the significant funding to one network
of theoretical physics networkers/researchers recently offered in this area
by a fairly wealthy and insightful young internet megabuckaneer.   Another
is the approach being taken by another network which is at this moment
initially capitalizing a mutual fund by small public investors to invest in
the leading prospects among the many such devices demonstrated most
effective in the last five
years or so.


> I guess, in the end, I would agree with you that world
> peace depends on new energy technology.  But, I would
> qualify that by insisting that it also depends on that
> technology be essentially free to every person on the
> planet.  It must not be controlled by anyone, let
> alone the status quo of the currently existing energy
> monopolies or sovereigns with fuel based economies.


I would say more clearly that the cause of global peace depends on this
change in Consciousness, or "spiritual reawakening" I mentioned above and
that these new Emerging Energy Technologies are just the "tip of the
iceberg" of the tangible benefits of this correction in human thinking whose
main application I believe is "the direct cause of true peace, harmony among
all life and free natural abundance as paradise on Earth".


> Thus, the "fuel" that provides the new energy must not
> be "earth-bound" and there must not be patents that
> threaten free access to the new energy technology by
> every person on the planet.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> --- David Crockett Williams <gear2000@...>
> wrote:
> > I am not sure what the distinction here is between
> > the "New National Energy
> > Policy Plan" (CNES Comprehensive National Energy
> > Strategy) prepared by DOE
> > after three public hearings in 1998 and submitted by
> > President Clinton to
> > Congress, <http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html>,
> > and the below described
> > "DOE Energy Strategic Plan" apparently open to
> > public comments since
> > 8Feb2000 at invitation of Secretary Richardson but
> > only today appearing in
> > the realm of one of my email interest groups and
> > indicating a deadline of
> > three days from now of Monday, April 10, 2000
> > (apparently extended from
> > March 31, 2000) courtesy of Mr. Wiggins (cc above).
> >
> SNIPPED FOR BANDWIDTH PRESERVATION
>
> __________________________________________________


David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html
Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts

USCampaign:   Williams-Peltier for US Pres/VP
gear2000@...
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

The Vision of Paradise on Earth
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

**Support HR 2545:
Global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
Details & Email:  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm
Sign letters to senators  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate
and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter

Easy index to email Congress & Media
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd
(copy & paste email letters to media and Congress)

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.htm

From: <carl.wiggins@...>
To: "Hal Fox" <halfox@...>
Cc: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>;
<StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: Re: GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 2:16 PM


I APOLOGIZE FOR ANY CONFUSION, but I am just another member
of the greenpower mailing list.  I was notified of the comment
deadline by an email notification from DOE concerning consumer
information.  I forwarded the notice because it had not been
sent to the greenpower mailing list.  I am employed as a U.S.
government employee with responsibilities that concern energy
consumption of new civil (Not defense) facilities in the south-
eastern part of the U.S.  In this capacity, I joined the green-
power mailing list to help me keep up with issues to help my
effects to green the government.


From: "Hal Fox" <halfox@...> AT internet on 04/12/2000 01:15 PM

To:   Carl A. Wiggins/4PCB/R04/GSA/GOV
cc:   "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
StrategicPlan@... AT
       internet@ccMTA-GEMS-MTA-01

Subject:  GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan

Date:  12 April 2000
From:  Hal Fox <halfox@...>
To:  carl.wiggins@... <carl.wiggins@...>
Cc:  "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>,
       <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan

Dear Dr. Carl Wiggins,

I received today a copy of your invitation dated Friday, April 7,
2000 inviting comments on the DOE Energy Strategic Plan with a
cutoff date for the following Monday, April 10, 2000.

Your email included the title:  "A draft copy of STRENGTH THROUGH SCIENCE:
POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY"

Obviously, this letter is outside of the time frame allowed for
comments.  However, DOE should be aware of the new-energy devices
that are now being commercialized in the U.S. and in other
countries with first products being prepared for the 2000 and
2001 market introductions.

In my recent letter to President Clinton, I strongly advised that
the present administration be aware of some of these new-energy
technologies because they may become important campaign issues.

You probably are well aware that the Department of Energy, while
spending billions on coal, oil, and nuclear power (especially in
the perennially failed efforts for hot fusion) spends zero funds
on any of the new-energy technologies.

Here is a report on just one of the emerging-energy technologies:

The several patents issued on high-density, charge-cluster (HDCC)
technology have been assigned to Emerging-Energy Marketing Firm,
Inc. for funding the further development and licensing of this technology
in the U.S., Canada, Taiwan, and elsewhere.  Technical information on this
new-energy technology has been (and is being) published in the
peer-reviewed Journal of New Energy and other important new-energy
publications.

This technology has the following attributes as shown in the more
than six laboratories that have worked with this technology:
1.  Thermal output without neutrons.
2.  Direct electrical output without thermal-to-electric
conversion.
3.  The transmutation of radioactive materials dissolved in a
water solution.
4.  The output of more than ten times the electrical energy used
to create and control the charge clusters (See U.S. Patent
5,018,180).
5.  (Not yet demonstrated experimentally)  The analytical work
showing that the HDCC technology can be used to develop a
particle accelerator that is one million times as effective (in
terms of proton density on target) than current particle
accelerator technology.  Obviously, this technology will be
developed for the on-site stabilization of high-level,
radioactive, spent-fuel pellets, even if not used in the U.S.

This writer has served in three wars (or police actions) for his
country and has a great love for the United States of America,
but not for some of its bureaus.  It would be a political
embarrassment for new-energy products to be commercialized
without such technology even being mentioned in DOE's "STRENGTH THROUGH
SCIENCE: POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY"

If there is any interest in having such new-energy technologies
included in your publication, I would be pleased to provide you
with copies of some of the peer-reviewed articles about some of
these important technologies.  Even better, you are invited to
visit the laboratory adjacent to our office and view some of the results of
our experimental work.

Best personal regards,  Hal Fox, editor, Journal of New Energy

From: "Hal Fox" <halfox@...>
To: <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 12:36 PM

Dear Dr. Carl Wiggins,

I received today a copy of your invitation dated Friday, April 7,
2000 inviting comments on the DOE Energy Strategic Plan with a
cutoff date for the following Monday, April 10, 2000.

Your email included the title:  "A draft copy of STRENGTH THROUGH
SCIENCE: POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY"

Obviously, this letter is outside of the time frame allowed for
comments.  However, DOE should be aware of the new-energy devices
that are now being commercialized in the U.S. and in other
countries with first products being prepared for the 2000 and
2001 market introductions.

In my recent letter to President Clinton, I strongly advised that
the present administration be aware of some of these new-energy
technologies because they may become important campaign issues.

You probably are well aware that the Department of Energy, while
spending billions on coal, oil, and nuclear power (especially in
the perennially failed efforts for hot fusion) spends zero funds
on any of the new-energy technologies.

Here is a report on just one of the emerging-energy technologies:

The several patents issued on high-density, charge-cluster (HDCC)
technology have been assigned to Emerging-Energy Marketing Firm,
Inc. for funding the further development and licensing of this
technology in the U.S., Canada, Taiwan, and elsewhere.  Technical
information on this new-energy technology has been (and is being)
published in the peer-reviewed Journal of New Energy and other
important new-energy publications.

This technology has the following attributes as shown in the more
than six laboratories that have worked with this technology:
1.  Thermal output without neutrons.
2.  Direct electrical output without thermal-to-electric
conversion.
3.  The transmutation of radioactive materials dissolved in a
water solution.
4.  The output of more than ten times the electrical energy used
to create and control the charge clusters (See U.S. Patent
5,018,180).
5.  (Not yet demonstrated experimentally)  The analytical work
showing that the HDCC technology can be used to develop a
particle accelerator that is one million times as effective (in
terms of proton density on target) than current particle
accelerator technology.  Obviously, this technology will be
developed for the on-site stabilization of high-level,
radioactive, spent-fuel pellets, even if not used in the U.S.

This writer has served in three wars (or police actions) for his
country and has a great love for the United States of America,
but not for some of its bureaus.  It would be a political
embarrassment for new-energy products to be commercialized
without such technology even being mentioned in DOE's "STRENGTH
THROUGH SCIENCE: POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY"

If there is any interest in having such new-energy technologies
included in your publication, I would be pleased to provide you
with copies of some of the peer-reviewed articles about some of
these important technologies.  Even better, you are invited to
visit the laboratory adjacent to our office and view some of the
results of our experimental work.

Best personal regards,  Hal Fox, editor, Journal of New Energy

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DCWilliams" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: [dcwilliams] Philosophical Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:12 AM

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "Bill"
Subject: Philosophical Comments on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 8:42 AM

Dear Bill,

I just wanted to thank you for taking the time from your busy work-a-day
schedule to offer your insightful comments on my initial response of Apr7 on
the DOE Strategic Plan2000.

I hope you will agree, after you have a chance to review my followup
comments on this Plan dated 10Apr, that we share similar philosphical views
on the ultimate direction that global societies need to take as these new
clean Emerging-Energy technologies come closer to imminent fruition.

I have interspersed a few comments on your response below and would like
your permission to forward your response to my appropriate lists as I think
your insights are worthy of serious consideration by several key people
involved in all this who come quickly to mind.  Not knowing if you want to
be "in the loop" on future discussions of related matters surely to come
resultant from such posts, unless or until I hear from you to the contrary I
will use this composite post for such purposes (including its supplemental
"post deadline" submission to Stategic__Plan@... because of
DOE's indicated commitment therein to fundamental research in
"matter/energy physics") omitting your full name and your email address.

In any case, I am quite intrigued by your uncommonly clear insights on some
of the key related principles connected to this matter and wonder if you
will send me a brief background info message on yourself, interests,
particular fields of study, etc., so that I may better consider the most
productive ways to collaborate with you more deeply in future.

With thanks,

David


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill"
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000


> David:
>
> Usually your messages are too long and have too many
> links for the limited time I have to ponder these
> topics.  There probably is no solution to this.  But,
> what this means is I am simply too busy to give all of
> this much thought or attention.  I have a routine life
> to maintain that involves my jobs, paying my bills,
> and keeping a roof over my head.
>
> But, the brief moments I have given to thinking about
> energy have given me the following thoughts:
>
> -The CONTROL of "Energy" is probably the number one
> driving force in global politics and economy.


It has sadly come to pass that those who control energy resources control
the ecomonic basis for politics and societies globally to the detriment of
the public in many cases.


> -This drive to CONTROL "Energy" is motivated by the
> desire for two things: 1) Political Power, and 2)
> Economic Dominance (money).
>
> -For the above reasons, controlling the world's energy
> resources is probably the number one cause of War,
> Famine, Genocide, etc.
>
> -When the world's energy needs were not so extreme as
> they are today, this driving force was Gold.
>
> -If Energy sources that are unencumbered by sovereign
> borders, patents, or corporate profit could be
> established and made practically and freely available
> to every human being on the planet, all of these
> factors would disappear.


Here you have clearly fingered the "National Security concerns" that
purportedly have suppressed this new science for at least the last two
decades of my study and perhaps the last 105 years since Tesla's Long Island
Power Plant was built and scuttled.

But, possibly this is THE key idea supportive of my convictions (since 1975
after reading The Roots of Consciousness by Jeffrey Mishlove discussing
theoretical physics being applied to new physics and cybernetics of
consciousness theories such as Dr. Jack Sarfatti's evolving post-quantum
physics of consciousness http://www.stardrive.org) that an adequate "Science
of Consciousness" can reconcile previously conflicting ideologies and allow
and empower the direct cause of true peace, harmony among all life and free
natural abundance as paradise on Earth, as per Hopi and other prophecy
fulfillment.  If your idea as expressed above were to be widely accepted and
utilized globally it may earn you a place in history of economic/political
philosophy on order of Karl Marx, Thomas Jefferson, et al.


> -The current controlling interests in global energy
> resources will savagely protect their "right" to
> continue to control both the distribution of energy
> and the world's economy as long as these resources are
> quantifiable as "fuel" based or a "product" that
> belongs to someone (earth bound resources, i.e.: coal,
> oil, water, etc.).
>
> -They will also fight to the death to establish their
> perceived right, or at least their patent power, to
> control future energy resources no matter where they
> originate (i.e.: solar energy, high density charge
> clusters, etc.)


This part I do not agree with because of what might be called a "self
limiting loop of understanding" wherein those who hold to present
power/dominance belief systems are automatically prevented from
understanding and accepting the validity of this new science and
technological applications of it, still therefore consider it "bunk" or
"junk science", and so usually ignore it as impracticable and unworthy of
their time.  There is a parallel in my experience between awakening of
innate human intelligence (ie, what might properly be called a "spiritual
reawakening") and one's ability to come to grips with the reality of this
new matter/energy/consciousness-Consciousness science (see O'Leary's Miracle
in the Void and Dr. Inomata's interpretations of this in terms of Qi or Chi
"energy").    As one's awakening expands and one can appreciate the reality
and truth behind this new knowledge, so also does an appreciation of the
interconnectedness (oneness) of all life become apparent and the
power/dominance syndrome fades from the Mind as a simple
misunderstanding of where the REAL power lies and
the nearly infinite possibilites of how its user is rewarded by applying it
for the benefit of "all Life" that the "awakened" human being then
understands how is connected to his/her "relative identity".

Herein I am delineating the concepts of,  {1} "mind" as used in post-quantum
physics of consciousness defined to be a property of matter itself and the
"configuration space" that has been previously conceptualized to understand
it in light of quantum physics anomalies and as distinguished from "Mind"
herein modified from my earlier writings uncapitalized to describe what in
most vocabularies/definitions applies to the "human mind" --- and of  {2}
"consciousness" as in the post-quantum physics theory usage to describe the
"back-action" on "mind"  (the mental field associated with matter
as a physical property of it) of "intent" applied on matter through "mind"
in this "strange mobius-like mind-matter-consciousness feedback loop", and
"Consciousness" as commonly used to describe the "human consciousness" as
almost universally used outside this new post-quantum physics of
consciousness discipline in such fields as psychology, neurosciences,
psychoimmunology, spiritual philosophies, etc.


> -We live in a global economy and political structure
> fueled by (pardon the pun) the control of earth-bound
> energy resources.  War translates to dollars for these
> controlling monopolies.
>
> -I am sure that the lack of "public outreach" is
> directly linked to the motivation to continue to keep
> control of the world's energy in the hands of the
> current energy monopolies.  The maintenance of
> "Control" and "Power" depend on keeping the public
> ignorant, and uninvolved.
>
> Because of all of this, I believe that the future of
> new energy technology needs to include the belief that
> energy belongs to everyone just as human genome
> information belongs to everyone.


Excellent point right on target to DOE Strategic Plan which, surprisingly to
me, also discusses DOE research collaboration on the human genome project.

Your comment here points to the reason why Dr. O'Leary's proposal is unique
among the many others who are still relying on "good ol' capitalism" as the
best tool.  Different from the original Manhattan Project, O'Leary's call
for a "New Manhattan Project" analog as a "crash program" to quickly finish
R&D evaluations of the many available emerging energy technologies is
clearly suggested as a global scale open free information exchange to
exploit this opportunity by all nations of the world simultaneously.

The only possible way this would be allowed to happen by the US National
Security Aparatus is if coincident with this plan we actually are able to
achieve global peace and harmony among the nations so that war itself and
preparations for war become permanently obsolete by some major changes in
the human and political conditions globally.

This sounds to most people as even more impossible than "free energy" but to
me they are simply two sides of the same new Science-of-Consciousness coin.


> As new energy technology is developed that does not
> rely on sources of quantifiable "earth bound" physical
> substances ("fuel") from within sovereign borders or
> private property, "patents," as they currently exist,
> should also be promoted as a thing of the past.
>
> "Ownership" (patents) of "energy" should be a globally
> unacceptable feature of international law.
>
> However, the new technology, has not been presented to
> the public in a fashion that is understandable or
> believable.  Until these new technologies can be
> presented in a way that the general public can at
> least understand the basic principles, there won't be
> a public buy-in to its promotion and development.
> Right now it is all too much like science fiction.


This is the challenge I have been facing in this area since my earliest,
1976, predictions of the advent of these "Tetronic Age" technologies.  At
that time I had not even heard of Nikola Tesla's work or anyone else who
thought that it was possible to develop the kinds of technologies I began
predicting then consequent to my Tetron hypothesis (TNUFT
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron.html) , i.e., fuel-less
["over-unity"] electric power generators, electro-gravi-magnetic
levitation vehicles, radioactivity decay rate accelerator, the water
transmitter, and advanced biomedical healing devices.

In the years since then, I read first about Tesla's work,
then met Bruce DePalma and through his network, and then later others,
started compiling a long list of various other researchers whose work seems
to support my predictions.

With the single exception of DePalma,
no scientist has yet told me that they understand my "theory", but it is
enough for me to know that so much work is "out there" that supports my
predictions which I feel will come to fruition quite rapidly after the right
"minds" come to grips with the simple but revolutionary basic concepts
of the Tetron Thesis which addresses THE fundamental crumbling cornerstone
of modern science since its inception with Galileo's empiricalism, i.e., the
notion that systems of reality under observation exist independently
reproducibly observable by all observers exclusive of variations in observer
identity (e.g., "belief systems", etc.) which are erroneously seen to have
no bearing on the nature of the physical dynamics of the system of reality
under observation.

The problem we face is that there is yet to be seen an adequate "theory", or
integrating explanation/terminology, that is widely accepted to describe the
various many different approaches to these new technologies which include
such labels as "homopolar (Faraday's term) overunity generators" such as
DePalma, Tewari, Inomata, et. al. (here "overunity" is used inclusively of
"incremental overunity" and "oveall overunity" anomalies observed for over
twenty years by various qualified experimentalists), "solid state
oscillating electomagnetic systems" such as Sparky Sweet and
Trombly-Farnsworth devices, Cold Fusion, High Density Charge Clusters, Low
Energy Nuclear Reactions, Low Energy Nuclear Transmutation, the rotating
magnetic/coil assembly of Joseph Newman (Newman Energy Machine) which he
claims converts matter to energy, the "hydrinos" of Mills' Blacklight Power
approach, etc., etc., etc., etc.

My best guess is that ultimately all these will be tied in to the Zero Point
Energy field referred to in my DOE comments of this year, and of 1998 when I
received the significant DOE letter of May'98 indicating their recent
position accepting 1997 verification/proof of the existence of ZPE and
indicating that a device to harness it would be considered the "Holy Grail
of energy research".

This is the arena (ZPE) where it may be easiest to relate the concepts to
the general public.  I will give below an historical overview from my
perspective as a chemist.

When I was studying chemistry at the California State University at
Northridge (then called San Fernando Valley State College), 1963-67, I was
considered by my teachers to be one of the better chemistry students to have
attended that school.  In a few of my chemistry and physics classes I was
the first person ever to consistently get 100% scores on tests.  I received
the first A grade in quantitative analysis ever given at that school, by a
hardnosed teacher I might add, even though the college did not yet have a
long history.

At that time the "accepted science" that had filtered down to the
college/university level taught us that as systems were cooled closer and
closer to absolute zero temperature it was measured that the "energy of the
system" got lower and lower and accepted theory at that time predicted that
at absolute zero temperature the motion of atoms and molecules would be such
that perhaps even the electrons of an atom would cease motion and their
orbits collapse.   Many years later I learned that in 1963 a prominent
theoretical physicist named John Archibald Wheeler did other calculations to
indicate that at absolute zero temperature the vacuum of empty space, the
space in which matter itself resides, possessed some kind of potential
energy field on the order of ten to the ninty-third power (10^93) grams per
cubic centimeter energy equivalent.  This energy field has come to be
understood as the Zero Point Energy field that is due to "quantum vacuum
fluctuations" which "cancel out" such that the question of how it might be
"harnessed" was largely ignored until the early 1980's when Adam Trombly
understood that DePalma's n-Machine overunity homopolar generator was
actually "tapping into" the ZPE and "liberating" some amount of it as usable
electricity.  From his understanding he quickly designed what he felt is an
improvement on the n-Machine design which he an a collaborator tested and
patented internationally as the "Trombly-Kahn Closed Path Homopolar
Generator".  By that time he had learned of a previously somewhat obscure
discovery of Michael Faraday from 1831 (then unknown to DePalma even though
he earlier taught electrical engineering at MIT) called the "homopolar
principle" (different than Faraday's discovery of the "induction principle"
first showing the connection of electricity and magnetism whereby
electricity is produced in a conductor from its motion in proximity to a
magnetic field).

So to open better public and more general scientific discussion and
understanding of this now very confusing and not-yet-well-understood new
clean-energy genre becoming known as Emerging Energy Technologies, I would
posit the hypothesis that all of these experimental technologies that are
actually viable (and we can be sure that many claims in this area will
ultimately prove false) are in some manner connected in their physics and
chemistry to interactions with this Zero Point Energy field, i.e., in some
way "harnessing" this "space power" (Tewari) extant in the space in which
matter resides.

My zen buddhist monk friend Yamato sees this as related to the "zero energy"
descriptive of the "emptiness" of the "void" object of zazen sitting
meditation yielding Buddha's "enlightenment" and we have received supportive
feedback on this line of investigation from the office of HH Dalai Lama as
well.

Yes, presently it sounds like science fiction to the lay public, but then so
did the airplane, submarine, travel to the moon, etc., not so many years in
human history before these things actually manifested.


> The removal of the risk of patent infringement from
> the equation will greatly enhance the chances of more
> rapid success in promoting the development of new
> energy technology.
>
> One might argue that this would also remove one of the
> major motivators, money, from the equation as well and
> that if developers couldn't control the rights of
> their developments they wouldn't expend the costs
> necessary for development.


Yes, you have hit the nail on the head here.   The concept you are dealing
with in this part is exactly the answer to the most frequently asked
question about these new technologies which first came to light twenty years
ago, i.e., "if this is true then why have these new energy technologies
not already reached the market?"


> In response to that argument, I would ask the
> following question:  "Has the money for development of
> new energy technology up until now come from large
> investors expecting a return on their investment based
> on profits generated from patents?"  If so, someone
> better investigate the real sources of these funds.
> If not, then perhaps it proves that the technology
> could be developed and refined without the control of
> outside big money investors who present the risk of
> controlling the resulting technology.
>
> If the latter is true, it may also be true that the
> elimination of the competition for the patents might
> up the developers to freely exchange the technology
> for more rapid refinement to the ultimate benefit of
> the world's people.


Two present approaches seem on the cusp of success right now but it
remains to be seen if "the awakening" I mention above will take effect among
the principals in time to prevent their otherwise certain failure following
past two decades precedents.  One is the significant funding to one network
of theoretical physics networkers/researchers recently offered in this area
by a fairly wealthy and insightful young internet megabuckaneer.   Another
is the approach being taken by another network which is at this moment
initially capitalizing a mutual fund by small public investors to invest in
the leading prospects among the many such devices demonstrated most
effective in the last five
years or so.


> I guess, in the end, I would agree with you that world
> peace depends on new energy technology.  But, I would
> qualify that by insisting that it also depends on that
> technology be essentially free to every person on the
> planet.  It must not be controlled by anyone, let
> alone the status quo of the currently existing energy
> monopolies or sovereigns with fuel based economies.


I would say more clearly that the cause of global peace depends on this
change in Consciousness, or "spiritual reawakening" I mentioned above and
that these new Emerging Energy Technologies are just the "tip of the
iceberg" of the tangible benefits of this correction in human thinking whose
main application I believe is "the direct cause of true peace, harmony among
all life and free natural abundance as paradise on Earth".


> Thus, the "fuel" that provides the new energy must not
> be "earth-bound" and there must not be patents that
> threaten free access to the new energy technology by
> every person on the planet.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> --- David Crockett Williams <gear2000@...>
> wrote:
> > I am not sure what the distinction here is between
> > the "New National Energy
> > Policy Plan" (CNES Comprehensive National Energy
> > Strategy) prepared by DOE
> > after three public hearings in 1998 and submitted by
> > President Clinton to
> > Congress, <http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html>,
> > and the below described
> > "DOE Energy Strategic Plan" apparently open to
> > public comments since
> > 8Feb2000 at invitation of Secretary Richardson but
> > only today appearing in
> > the realm of one of my email interest groups and
> > indicating a deadline of
> > three days from now of Monday, April 10, 2000
> > (apparently extended from
> > March 31, 2000) courtesy of Mr. Wiggins (cc above).
> >
> SNIPPED FOR BANDWIDTH PRESERVATION
>
> __________________________________________________


David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html
Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts

USCampaign:   Williams-Peltier for US Pres/VP
gear2000@...
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

The Vision of Paradise on Earth
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

**Support HR 2545:
Global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
Details & Email:  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm
Sign letters to senators  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate
and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter

Easy index to email Congress & Media
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd
(copy & paste email letters to media and Congress)

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.htm

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: "DCWilliams" <dcwilliams@egroups.com>
Subject: [dcwilliams] Ethics & DOE Strategic Plan2000, a White House Paper,
public input
Date: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:12 AM

See also subsequent "Philosophical Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000" at
http://egroups.com/group/dcwilliams/3.html


From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To: <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: Ethics & DOE Strategic Plan2000, a White House Paper, public input
Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 3:20 AM

<http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/strategy.html>
           This is a Global Emergency Alert Response:


Ethics & DOE Strategic Plan2000, a White House Paper, public input by


David Crockett Williams  --  April 10, 2000
Bachelor of Science, Chemistry (CSUN 1969)
Chartered Life Underwriter (ACLU 1971)
Coordinator, UN 50&55th anniversary Global Peace Walk '95 & 2000
Independent Candidate for United States President 1996 & 2000

Strategic Plan2000 addresses issues of energy production, global climate
change, U.S. National Security, advances in science, and interagency global
problem solving coordination, but it is severely hampered in its present
form by its failure to properly integrate available insights into ethics
errors whose correction is essential for the future of The Nation and The
Globe.

Over the past two years significant under-reported advances have been made
in fundamental science and new Clean-Energy applications availing previously
esoteric knowledge of the nature of consciousness along with technologies to
replace contemporary energy systems and to neutralize radioactive wastes
while invigorating a more robust sustainable global economy.

A wise teacher once said, "At the deepest level of Mind, everyone knows The
Truth but to survive and prosper in the material world we have all been
conditioned since birth to pretend that we can invent it."

Errors in perception of the very nature of truth itself are the basis for
ethics errors which may only be corrected by higher levels of understanding.

This paper also mentions solutions to fundamental misunderstandings rooted
in the historical progression of human thought from the "reasonable", to the
"objective", to the present "relative" view of the nature of truth itself
which is the basis of modern societies and which is at the root of the US
DOE as the contemporary incarnation of the Manhattan Project of 1942 that
used the "equations of relativity" to produce the atomic bomb that is still
foolishly considered the cornerstone of "US National Security".

Sections of this paper include:  (1) Background;  (2) Immediate Focus;  (3)
Delineation of Manifestations of Ethics Errors;  (4) Page-by-Page Specific
Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000 Draft;  (5) Conclusion and Action Plan;
(6) Author references.


1)  Background

This position paper is offered for widespread evaluation as a public comment
to the people and governments of America and the world in response to input
request on DOE's Strategic Plan 2000 draft per advice
<carl.wiggins@...> to <green-power@...>
<http://www.crest.org/renewables/green-power-archive/msg00219.html>
of Friday, April 07, 2000 1:56 PM, Subject: "GP: Your turn to comment on DOE
Energy Strategic Plan", which indicated that the draft copy of "Strength
Through Science: Powering The 21st Century", the Energy Department's
strategic plan, is available on the world wide web for public comment
through today Monday, April 10, at <http://www.doe.gov/stategic_plan> which
indicates public comments are requested by 31March2000.  This position paper
is supplemental to my initial response of April 7th before review of
Strategic Plan Draft <http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier/9.html>
sent to Strategic_Plan@... which references my public comments of
two years ago on DOE's Comprehensive National Energy Strategy (CNES)
<http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier/8.html>, and which includes
the appeal for extension of this public comments deadline until 30Apr2000 to
allow time for more adequate public input in light of the global Earth Day
2000 theme of "Clean Energy Now!".   Additional documentation to support
opinions in this paper, and additional attachments submitted with my CNES
comments, will be posted after today at
<http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/doc.html>.

To avoid undue repetition here see my initial response and CNES comments
above for details on this summary, and additional websites below.


2)  Immediate Focus

Today we face a national and global social and environmental emergency as
evidenced by increasing intensity of domestic violence, global climate
change, international terrorism, inter-religious hostilities and
misunderstandings, addictions, wars, and the misdirection of human and
finanical resources to the preparations for war instead of towards solving
critical social and environmental problems before it is too late in this age
of proliferating weapons of mass destruction.

In large part, the daily struggle and methods for acquisition of energy
resources, individually, nationally, and globally, that are required for
ever-more-consumptive lifestyles are linked to the causes of this emergency
because of how energy, food, housing, money, and personal perceptions of
power and self-worth are perceived to be tied to successful vigorous
competition over these presently limited resources.   The forefront new
science mentioned above and discussed below offers harmonization of
conflicting ideologies, and the promise of virtually unlimited low cost
energy resources, which can minimize or eliminate this struggle and resolve
this global emergency with our proper cooperative responses.

In today's edition of my local newspaper, the Bakersfield Californian, wire
service reports are condensed in a brief report of yesterday's conclusion of
talks in Japan by G-8 environmental ministers from the world's
industrialized nations expressing hope for ratification as soon as possible
of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on global warming, despite U.S. and Canadian
opposition to its fixed deadline for reducing greenhouse gases to 7 percent
below 1990 levels by 2008-2012, largely because of U.S. auto and oil
companies' opposition and the hotly debated emission-trade plan.
The meeting was a prelude to the sixth conference on the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP6), scheduled for
November in The Hague, Netherlands, which is considered crucial in promoting
the early ratification and enforcement of the Kyoto Protocol.

As I detailed in my CNES comments, this Kyoto Protocol goal represents a
decrease from 1998 levels of 13 percent, while the projected change in
carbon emissions from increased fossil fuel usage over this time frame is
projected by DOE to increase by 20 percent -- adding up to a 33 percent
disparity between forecast and goal compared to 1998 levels.   Nothing in
CNES or the Strategic Plan draft addresses how it is possible to accomplish
even this token inadequate commitment which does not reverse the global
warming trend factors but only slows down the rate of increase of climate
changing greenhouse gases.  In order to solve the problem we need to reverse
the present trend -- not just slow it down, i.e., not only move away from
fossil fuels but save the existing trees and regreen the planet and restore
the atmospheric oxygen depletion that is exacerbating the ozone layer
depletion that threatens all the oceanic phytoplankton (over half Earth's
oxygen supply) with destruction (by 2008 according to Project Earth climate
modeling predictions of 1988 deemed by them on target in 1997
http://www.projectearth.com) and accelerating polar ice melting.

What the DOE in its vernacular calls "Stakeholders" from whom "public
comments" are carefully solicited on its various plan documents, while the
general public and the scientific community in general is left to fend for
coincidental last-minute opportunities like this one for public comment,
seem in reality to be special interest groups vested in current high-profit
energy systems and nuclear power/weapons related industries.  Since these
same special interest groups provide the bulk of political fundraising and
lobbying efforts, it is no wonder that regarding global climate change the
US Bureaucratocracy is "fiddling while Rome burns".

If we want to learn how to put out the fire, instead of just having a "good
old time" until we all burn up, it may require a hard cold look at a broader
global view to contrast the myths and legends that Americans have
swallowed hook, line and sinker as US history.


(3)  Delineation of Manifestations of Ethics Errors

Machiavellianism is said to be the quiet behind-the-scenes "realism" of
modern politics where even rules and agreements of law can be intentionally
broken at will, and brutal violence used indiscriminately, for the purposes
of expediently propagating the myth of the sovereign power of the state.

The United States and its Constitution were created on the premise that
individual human beings are the sovereign entities by divine right, and that
they cede a limited authority to the government for the management of the
common good.  In these times the governments of the world, especially
including the United States, have completely taken over by the threat of
violence and imprisonment the sovereignty of the individual and cede back to
him/her limited "rights" "guaranteed by law".   Yet when the public
continually witnesses such rights and laws being deliberately ignored and
disregarded at will by the government, who can have faith in its ethics and
integrity, and in their own divine legacy as sovereign and sacred human
beings?

Is it any wonder that over the last century of witnessing these injustices
that people have become more rebellious of governments around the
world and nonviolence is all but a forgotten teaching?  Is it really any
wonder that crime is such big business in the United States, with such
swelling prison populations of virtually slave laborers, that private
prisons sell stock on Wall Street?!   Is this really a democracy
(self-government) in the United States when such a tiny percentage of the
people actually vote into power, over all of us, the representatives of Our
Republic?

It might be more accurately called an unethical Bureaucratocracy.

Hitler is rightfully criticized for the deaths of millions of people in the
"concentration camps" of WWII, but who in America pays attention to his
claim of inspiration for this kind of atrocity from the United States'
treatment of the American Indian peoples, tens of millions of whom have been
sacrificed over our country's history, a sacrifice which intensified with
the discovery of energy resources on the indigenous people's "reservations"
and which continues today in places like the "National Sacrifice Area" of
northeastern Arizona where the people are still being destroyed by US energy
acquisition policies.   It would be virtually impossible to find one single
nation-to-nation Treaty that the United States has made with the native
American peoples that has not been broken and abrogated by the US
government.   Is it really any wonder that so many people around the world
are furious with the United States and are even threatening the use of
weapons of mass destruction?

The underhanded mechanations behind the 1970's push for uranium mining in
the Black Hills of South Dakota fomented such a high level of violence
against those indigenous peoples who resisted this move that hundreds of
members of the Tribal Nations in that area were murdered over a few years
time which led to such intensity of hostilities that even when two FBI
agents were murdered at Jumping Bull Ranch all of the defendents were
acquitted on the grounds of self defense except American Indian Movement
leader Leonard Peltier who is still imprisoned after 26years, "railroaded"
on ballistics and extradition evidence that the prosecution later admitted
was falsified.  Amnesty International recognizes Peltier as a political
prisoner of the United States Government and mostly our citizens are
largely apathetic to his plight while millions around the world support
his release under executive clemency or parole, including Nelson Mandela,
Bishop Tutu, et. al.

In February of 1945 there was a meeting of the Allied Powers in Europe on
the eve of the expected defeat of Hitler which came in April.  At that
meeting, then-secret agreements were made for dividing up the conquered
countries of the Axis powers among Allied jurisdictions including the Soviet
Union which reportedly agreed would invade Japan to finish the war and
extend its territory.  After the defeat of Nazi Germany the US became
increasingly wary of Stalin and the Soviet postwar communist intentions and
potential threat to western societies.  In this context in June of 1945 in
San Francisco was convened the convention to create the charter for the
United Nations Organization, a charter signed by the founding nations in
agreement to its basic principles to end the scourge of war for the future
generations, to foster respect for human rights, and to enable the people of
the nations to live in peace.  Among those principles was the renunciation
of weapons and practices of mass destruction as were exemplified in the
gruesome freshness of the Nazi gas chambers applied to noncombatant civilian
populations.  The US Manhattan Project had already been underway since 1942
for the express purpose of creating the greatest weapon of indiscriminate
mass destruction that the world had ever known, the atomic bomb, which was
not abandoned in spite of the US signing the UN Charter agreement.

While American history records that the atomic bombs were used against the
civilian noncombatant populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (almost entirely
women, children and elderly with most men away at war) to save the lives of
American soldiers, at that time the Soviet Union was reportedly massing
troops on its border preparing according to agreement to invade Japan.  In
addition to saving American soldiers' lives the atomic bombings were
executed in violation of the signed UN charter and were also the first human
test of the uranium and plutonium versions of the atomic bomb, implicitly
conducted to threaten the Soviet Union with a similar fate if it did not
demur to American global dominance and occupation of Japan which has in
effect become a colony of the United States since then, abandoning its
non-rearmament peace constitution under US pressure to create a
"self-defense force" that today has a military capability greater than WWII.

Ten weeks after the atomic bombings, in the context of the dominant American
nuclear threat against any enemies, the UN charter was ratified in New York
on October 24, 1945, by the founding nations including the US which has
continued to violate this charter by the ongoing first-strike threat of the
use of nuclear weapons.  Is it any wonder that the Soviet Union, which lost
so many millions of citizens in the war with Germany, responded in kind to
this threat and built up its own nuclear arsenal?

Today the Soviet Union exists no longer and its threat of communist
domination has ended.  The Japanese-Americans who were interned during WWII
have received apologies and reparations.  But not one American President has
ever apologized or repented the atomic bombings of the civilian populations
of Japan or renounced the threat of their use to further American global
dominance, i.e., "National Security".  Not one American President has yet
recognized as the first step towards true national security the repudiation
of the use of nuclear weapons.

Ample evidence exists that in 1895 Nikola Tesla built an electric power
plant on Long Island in New York, based on his advanced knowledge of
electromagnetism and new energy technology he tested in Colorado, that was
to power all of America with fuel-less electric power wirelessly transmitted
but his backer, J.P. Morgan, decided to scuttle the project in favor of the
more profitable induction-based systems that we still have today with their
expensive but profitable copper mining, electric meters, etc.

From time immemorial until the early part of the 20th Century one of the
most useful plants in human history for food, oil, fiber, medicines, paper,
cloth, canvas, etc., was the hemp plant which has superior qualities in
many of these uses, which grows prolifically without fertilizers or
pesticides on even marginal farmland, and which was made into cheap early
automobile fuels before the fossil fuel industry took over the American
economy.   Hemp was the mainstay of early America yet after it was outlawed
as marijuana in 1937 by a campaign of yellow journalism and an historic
fraud on the US Congress perpetrated by industrial monopolists to protect
threatened profits in the timber-paper, petrochemical, and fossil fuel
industries, et. al., the suppression of the truth about this plant has been
so thorough that it has been essentially erased from our collective memory
and expunged from history.  Yet this plant, now still demonized as a "drug",
is perhaps the single most important plant for the future of humanity
because of its superior applicability for biofuels and the carbon
sequestration needed to ameliorate global climate change while replacing the
need to cut down trees for most of their current uses.

Oil and drugs are the two most powerful addictions of modern societies which
are manipulating people for profit.

With the US now beginning to commit itself to another "Vietnam War", in
Columbia striving for oil resources access and protection while deploying
purportedly ongoing Iran/Contra-style CIA drugwar strategies/skullduggery
http://www.egroups.com/message/global-peace-walk/318 in this year of high
level oil prices & drug war electioneering, all these issues need to be
reexamined carefully in light of hidden history coming to light.  In
Columbia the indigenous U'Wa people are being destroyed by Occidental
Petroleum's planned exploitation of major oil reserves.  Not many people
know that the offshore oil leases around north and south Vietnam were
assigned to the like of Texaco, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, Amoco,
etc., and that the Mekong Delta had more expected potential for oil than
the Mississippi Delta.   Both Vietnam and Columbia wars involve covert
use of drug smuggling revenues Iran/Contra-style as in the CIA/KLA
collaboration in the Kosovo war to secure the oil pipeline route through the
Balkans from the Middle East to Europe.  <http://www.copvcia.com>   These
wars are somewhat less obviously related to oil than the Gulf War which is a
classic example of how our National Security and oil energy supplies are so
violently linked.


(4) Page-by-Page Specific Comments on DOE Strategic Plan2000 Draft

Due to time constraints on such short notice to read and evaluate the
lengthy Strategic Plan Draft, some comments on various pages of the draft
may be out of page [#] order.

The most important thing to begin with is evaluation of the degree of
precision and accuracy in the language used which is entirely conditioned on
mutually understandable definitions of terms and which determines the "truth
coefficient" of the document.

The best example to illustrate this point keys in on the various
inconsistencies throughout the document regarding the confusing and
imprecise use of words such as "emissions", "pollutions", "carbon
emissions", "particulate matter", "greenhouse gases", and even "clean".   As
someone who earned a Bachelor of Science degree with honors in Chemistry, I
am dismayed at the lack of overall clarity of information presentation due
to switched and confusing terminology definitions used in the various parts
of the Strategic Plan document.  Since I understand the chemistry of what is
being discussed it is easy to see how this language/definition problem, even
at the internal level of the DOE, prevents clear communication and
understanding of the nature and scope of the problems and solutions faced by
today's energy industry.

The primary energy industry "greenhouse gas" is carbon dioxide, which is
"emitted" by fuel carbon or hydrocarbon combustion that commensurately
consumes oxygen from which Earth's protective ozone layer is phototropically
produced.  Although incomplete combustion also produces an array of other
"emissions" including particulate carbon, carbon monoxide, various unburned
hydrocarbons, combusted fuel impurities like oxides of sulphur, etc., i.e.,
air "pollutions", the lazy shorthand term of "carbon emissions" seems, at
least for purposes of energy industry greenhouse gases quantification, to
primarily describe carbon dioxide expressed as for example "tons of carbon
emissions".

Yet on page [5] of the Strategic Plan under the Energy Challenges subsection
of the DOE's Challenges section, it says "The Department's Energy Resources
R&D Portfolio is addressing the carbon emissions challenge by proposing
investments in a variety of clean fuel options, such as natural gas...", in
the same first partial paragraph which concludes with "The Energy Resources
R&D Portfolio also recognizes the continuing importance of nuclear power in
generating clean, emission-free electricity".

From this it seems that DOE's greatest challenge is one of truthfully and
accurately representing the facts.   For an agency whose rhetoric prides
itself on its "world class science" it is hard to see these two statements
as mistakes instead of obfuscation.

Sure natural gas burns "cleaner" in terms of more complete combustion with
perhaps less impurities than, say, the high sulphur uranium contaminated
coal that is stripmined from the the "National Sacrifice Area" of the Black
Mesa in Arizona and burned in power plants with unfiltered smokestacks
producing reportedly more acid rain pollutions than the top five US cities
combined while showering thousands of square miles with radioactive ash
and the coal transport slurry line drains underground water drying up the
Tribal Nations lands in the whole area, BUT, in absolutely no way is natural
gas combustion "cleaner" in terms of reducing carbon dioxide emissions
because it still yields carbon dioxide upon combustion in the same
proportions as coal or oil.   By no stretch of the imagination does
investment in natural gas combustion ameliorate carbon dioxide greenhouse
gas energy industry emissions.

As to nuclear power producing "clean emission-free electricity", sure there
are no carbon emissions but it does produce the most toxic "emissions"
imaginable that are subject to catastrophic releases, meltdowns, etc., as
evidenced by Three Mile Island and recent accidents in Japan, etc.  Even
more routinely tragic and dangerous are the effects of uranium mining and
wind-blown tailings piles continually causing cancers and deaths to the
local people in mining areas most of whom are members of Tribal Nations who
are "sacrificed" like the Big Mountain Dineh (Navajo) people forcibly
relocated from the Black Mesa to "new lands" in the area of the Rio Puerco
uranium tailings pond dam burst and flood that makes these lands dangerously
radioactive.

For "world class science" to tout nuclear power as "clean emission-free
electricity" is unconscionable when the main "emission" is the nuclear waste
that is piling up at every nuclear power plant with no place to go, except
sneaking it across country into Yucca Mountain without required permits
targeted for FY 2010 per Strategic Plan [64] and in violation of US Treaty
with the Western Shoshone Tribal Nation, while DOE ignores the LENT Low
Energy Nuclear Transmutation data submitted two years ago about this
demonstrated new technology to neutralize radioactive wastes.

A recent summary of this research courtesy of Emerging Energy Mutual Fund:

"The Transmutation of Nuclear Wastes

"Currently over 55 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste is stored
in leaking underground tanks at Hanford, Washington.  These and other
storage facilities in the US and Russia are already leaking into ground
water supplies.  We (humans) discovered how to make these materials; we must
also discover how to safely undo this radioactive legacy.

"This urgent scientific problem can be solved.  Unknown to most people
outside the scientific community, the transmutation of elements (changing
one element into another) has been demonstrated using several pioneering
processes. Some of these processes have shown it may be possible to
stabilize radioactive material.

"Transmutation of elements has been demonstrated using:

(1)  Electron charge clusters by Kenneth Shoulders
(2)  Cold fusion technology by J. Dash and T. Mizuno
(3)  Gaseous cold fusion technology by Karbut
(4)  Electrolytic cells by H. Fox
(5)  Accelerated gamma-rays by P. Brown

"We believe the most promising physical process is based on the use of
high-density electron charge clusters.

"The US Department of Energy, so far, has ignored promising solutions
despite these scientists' progress toward solving this most dangerous of
scientific problems. The US Department of Energy has not shown sufficient
interest in developing or implementing new technologies.  The DOE has
instead committed to a questionable and incredibly costly plan of vitrifying
a mere portion of the nation's nuclear waste and storing it "temporarily" in
Yucca Mountain. These deadly wastes remain hazardous for more than 10,000
years.

"We propose a one-year effort to prove the physics of high-density electron
charge cluster transmutation for the purpose of the amelioration of
radioactive materials. Our plan is to research the technology and perform
one or more demonstrations of the different techniques. The purpose of the
demonstration will be to take what others have shown to be possible,
validate this technology and take it to the next step by improving the
transmutation efficiency. This effort will lead to the elimination of
nuclear waste permanently, rather than storing it for millennia.

"The proposed study should involve the leading scientists in the field,
including Ken Shoulders, Hal Fox, John Dash, Paul Brown, and others. It is
time to explore fully whether or not one or more of the proposed
transmutation techniques really work and can be engineered to demonstrate
conclusively their usefulness in eliminating the nuclear waste problem.

"For more information, contact Stephen Kaplan, 503-297-7348,
<kap808@...>"


It is patently evident that this is a superior alternative to "geologic
disposal [as] the [present] national strategy".


Kaplan is also co-author of a recent detailed referenced article (with Dr.
Brian O'Leary, at <http://www.connexion.org/kaplan>) featuring an overview
of the many new Clean-Energy technologies mentioned above to replace
nuclear, fossil fuel, hydroelectric, and other inefficient induction-based
electricity generating power systems.   Dr. O'Leary was the science and
energy policy advisor and speechwriter for four US Presidential candidates,
wrote the foreword for journalist Jeane Manning's book about this genre
called The Coming Energy Revolution and his book on the topic called Miracle
in the Void, and was passed over for appointment to a top DOE science post
in 1998.  More on his work may be found at <http://www.maui.net/~oleary>.

Contrary to DOE Strategic Plan speculations, this new genre of power
technology does promise to be a "silver bullet" to address the energy
demands for the 21st Century in all three end-use sectors:  Buildings,
transportation, and industry. [4]

One possible explanation for overall DOE intransigence towards serious
investigation and implementation of these new ideas may be found in
Strategic Plan references beginning on [7] "nearly half of the current R&D
technical managers will be able to retire in five years;  serious skills
gaps have developed due to significant downsizing; [and] there exists
virtually no pipeline to develop future managers..."   With the senior R&D
staff too old to embrace cutting edge developments from the private sector,
technical skills gaps and no hope for replacing the aging DOE
Bureaucratocracy, perhaps it is time to either embrace Dr. Eugene Mallove's
<http://www.infinite-energy.com> contention that the DOE itself should be
dissolved or seriously restructured, and/or Dr. O'Leary's appeal for a New
Manhattan Project analog as a global public "crash program" to rapidly
complete R&D and implementation of these new Clean-Energy technologies.

After we received the DOE letter of May 1998 detailed in my initial response
above, the DOE point of contact appointed by then Energy Secretary Pena did
his best to liaison with our people to input these ideas into the DOE R&D
bureaucracy and he was encouraged by the 1997 results cited in that letter
proving the existence of the long postulated Zero Point Energy (ZPE) field
that some researchers feel is at the root of many of these new energy
technologies' operation (what the DOE letter called the "Holy Grail of
energy research"), but after a few months in mid-1998 of career threatening
internal resistence he backed off and was apparently reassigned to other
tasks under the administration of new Energy Secretary Richardson.  This is
hardly a comforting example in support of purported DOE "Core Values" [3]
"4. We value creativity and innovation",  "8. We pursue the highest
standards of ethical behavior", and from the Strategic Plan inside back
cover "3. We value listening as an essential tool in learning from others".

These new technologies specifically fulfill the Strategic Plan Draft [18]
prediction that "Advanced technology may ultimately mitigate some of
these..." [17] Key External Factors beyond DOE's direct control that are
expected to influence DOE's Strategic Planning, i.e., climate change
amelioration decisions, aging facilities (by 2015, 60% of coal fired and 40%
of nuclear power plants will be 40 years old and it is not clear how much
longer they can operate due to regulatory and economic issues), Yucca
Mountain Site Characterization Process and NRC, EPA regulations for proposed
high level nuclear waste repository, and "public perception directly affects
(sic) Congressional and Administration support for DOE programs."

Certainly it would appear that even without additional funding the existing
[26] DOE Energy Research and Development Portfolio of April 1999 budget of
$7 billion can accomodate all or a good portion of the $108 million annual
budget proposed by Dr. O'Leary for the "New Manhattan Project" given its
potential value to accomplishing DOE and Strategic Plan goals including
amelioration of nuclear wastes.  However, if the American public is properly
advised of this opportunity there would be no doubt that each American would
be thrilled to chip in a dollar a year from their taxes to fund this
Project.  This would help fulfill the Strategic Plan's commitment to
"breakthrough research in science and technology".

Biofuels are mentioned [4] and an extensive Interagency Crosscutting
Coordination discussion pervades the Strategic Plan text with other agencies
involved listed in Appendix A, including the US Department of Agriculture
(which conducted the 1941-45 Hemp for Victory program to help win WWII), but
this Crosscutting needs to include the White House Office of Drug Policy
Control to reverse Federal resistence to hemp relegalization in favor of a
global scale emergency revival of the Hemp for Victory campaign to win the
"war" against global climate change, not only for its superior biofuels
applications (see my CNES comments discussion) but also for adequate
effective [27] "carbon sequestration".

Finally, for the time I can now devote, the organization chart [15] shows a
positive change from the 1997 to the 2000 versions where "illustrative
measures for strategy", is replaced and realigned to "performance goal for
objective", but there needs to be included a box for "error analysis and
feedback adjustments" in the system for it to take advantage of the
cybernetics of goal accomplishment or the DOE will continue to lack the best
helmsmanship techniques available.


(5) Conclusion and Action Plan

With the development of such an organizational plan implemented by modern
electronic communications media and embraced by the peple, the agencies and
governments of this Globe, and including the corrected ethics reflective of
modern advances in the chemical physics of consciousness itself, the present
course of human history may be, and must be, quickly changed off of the path
towards total destruction and onto the path towards realizing the goal of
true peace, harmony among all life and free natural abundance as paradise on
Earth.

Give O'Leary the $108 million per year under a negotiated performance
contract for him to initiate the "New Manhattan Project".

This message and related information will be offered to the Global Peace
Walk 2000 for public dissemination and delivery on its arrival in Washington
DC, October 6-12, 2000, and to the United Nations for its 55th anniversary
October 24th to help inaugurate the UN Year and Decade of Creating a Culture
of Peace for the 21st Century.  This walk is hoping to gather over a million
people for a ceremony to rededicate the Washington Monument as a Symbol of
the Message of Peace on the October 9th Columbus Day Holiday which is also
John Lennon's 60th birthday and, according to the Smithsonian Institute, the
observed 1000 year anniversary of the arrival of the Vikings to America.


The above article has been abbreviated due to time constraints for
submission so for additional claims documentation, references, and updates
see <http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/doc.html>.


(6) Author references

David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
   Bachelor of Science, Chemistry (CA State Univ. Northridge '69)
   Chartered Life Underwriter (American College of Life Underwriters PA '71)

   Author of Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory equations '74-'77
   (purports to be a correction and completion of E=mC^2 defining Tetron
   as the human mind's consciousness orientation function of light)
   <http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron.html>

GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html
Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts

USCampaign:   Independent US Presidental Campaign2000
Williams for President and Leonard Peltier Vice President
gear2000@...
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

The Vision of Paradise on Earth
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

Support HR 2545:
global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act of 1999
Details & Email:  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm
Sign letters to senators  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate
and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter

Easy index to email Congress & Media
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd
(copy & paste email letters to media and Congress)

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html

From: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
To:  <StrategicPlan@...>
Subject: by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000
Date: Friday, April 07, 2000 7:49 PM

I am not sure what the distinction here is between the "New National Energy
Policy Plan" (CNES Comprehensive National Energy Strategy) prepared by DOE
after three public hearings in 1998 and submitted by President Clinton to
Congress, <http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html>, and the below described
"DOE Energy Strategic Plan" apparently open to public comments since
8Feb2000 at invitation of Secretary Richardson but only today appearing in
the realm of one of my email interest groups and indicating a deadline of
three days from now of Monday, April 10, 2000 (apparently extended from
March 31, 2000) courtesy of Mr. Wiggins (cc above).

I would suggest to Mr. Wiggins and DOE by this email, and those in agreement
following copied to <StrategicPlan@...>, that this deadline should be
extended to the end of April 2000 so as to take advantage of the "Clean
Energy Now!" campaign being fostered by the EarthDay2000 events across
country so that this network of activists including many clean energy
experts have a chance to offer their public input.

I am again disappointed at the low degree of public outreach apparently
effected by DOE on this most important matter of our national energy
strategy revisions especially in light of the mounting evidence of imminent
global warming environmental catastrophes at hand in the coming few years
and I most urgently ask for such public input deadline extension to end of
April 2000.   I would at least have expected DOE to notify public commenters
on 1998 CNES about this new public input solicitiation.

I was among a small number of people who found out in time to offer oral and
written testimony to DOE CNES hearings in 1998 and my public comments were
excerpted on p55 of first draft and p57 of final draft April 1998 as "One
commenter recommended that DOE look into zero-point energy and referred to a
specific technology for harnessing it called the "N" machine.  He challenged
the Secretary of Energy to fully investigate this technology and let the
American public know about it." [<http://www.depalma.pair.com> ]

One of the two people I was able to alert in time to testify at the last
public hearing on CNES, in Washington DC chaired by Secretary Pena, Thomas
Valone of Integrity Research Institue, got some of his recommendations
included in CNES public comments record following the above remarks as
"Another commenter encouraged DOE to form an office for emerging
technologies.  The commenter explained that truly new groundbreaking
technologies would emerge only when an office is established to engage
scientists and researchers who are on the fringe of technology."

The other person I alerted who testified there, William Thomas of
Proposition One in Washington DC, on February 19, 1998, queried the Energy
Secretary as to DOE position on these new clean energy technologies,
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980219.cnes.htm> "Allegedly,
this new genre of zero point energy technology needs no fuel, is freely
available, and is free of pollution. Assuming this is true, obviously this
technology would entirely replace fossil and nuclear power and form the
foundation of the optimal national, even international, energy policy."
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980219.transcript.htm> and
Secretary Pena ordered a letter sent to him which was received dated May 12,
1998, over the signature of Robert W. Gee, Assistant Secretary, DOE Office
of Policy and International Affairs, after he submitted additional written
comments on February 25, 1998
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980225.cnes.htm> and sent a
letter to his Congressperson April 29, 1998 asking for her help
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980429.norton.htm>.  This letter
of May 12, 1998,
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/980512.khan.htm>
closed with the comment "If you have further questions, please contact Ehsan
Khan of the Office of Energy Research at (202) 586-4785" [Dr. Khan referred
David Hamilton or David Goodwin as the new DOE point of contact on 20Sep99]
The letter contained an attachment describing the DOE's recent acceptance of
evidence for the potential of the idea of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) devices
<http://www.prop1.org/thomas/peacefulenergy/casimir.htm> saying,
"The energy associated with the ZPE is known to be essentially inexhaustible
and ubiquitous, so a question that arises in the mind of the technologist is
whether such energy can be 'mined' for practical use and thereby constitute
the "Holy Grail" of energy research. "

I subsequently solicited from my network additional input to Dr. Khan, as
the then point of contact at DOE, on these emerging energy technologies and
additional information was offered by Thomas Bearden, Hal Fox, and Eugene
Mallove, which resulted in an expressed interest and faint hope that the DOE
would further investigate more seriously the other variations on this new
clean-energy genre also known under the various names of Cold Fusion, High
Density Charge Clusters, and the Low Energy Nuclear Transmutation devices
proven to neutralize radioactive wastes as well as liberating energy
apparently/possibly from the ZPE.   Due to the controversial nature of this
new science which was until recently well ahead of contemporary theoretical
physics now being evaluated by Sarfatti, et al, no apparent progress has
been made towards updating new Energy Secretary Richardson on these
developments.

Or possibly, as claimed by journalist Jeane Manning in her book about some
of these technologies, The Coming Energy Revolution, there is in another
department (DOD?) a "dual-use" secrecy restriction hampering their public
development while evidence exists that the new science behind them is being
developed covertly inside and outside the US for advanced electromagnetic
weaponry.

I am submitting below my recent brief summary of these new emerging
clean-energy technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power and
neutralize radioactive wastes, in the form of my appeal for this issue to
become a mainstream issue in this year's political arena for national
elections in November.

The text of my DOE CNES 1998 hearing testimony and following written public
comments detailing these arguments/data in context of CNES codifications is
posted at http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier/8.html

I fully agree with Dr. O'Leary that we need a global emergency level
"crash-program" (a "New Manhattan Project" analog) to rapidly complete
research and development on optimum emerging energy technologies for
immediate deployment to address global climate change before it is too late.
I also agree with his assessment of the need for relegalization and
widespread cultivation of the industrial hemp plant to replace the need to
cut trees and as the most efficient biofuels source.   Even if we had these
new clean-energy technologies fully implemented today, this would only slow
the present atmospheric degradation because so many trees have already been
cut.  To reverse the greenhouse effect and replenish atmospheric oxygen
needed to heal the ozone layer depletion we need to rapidly regreen the
planet
with a global emergency level program that would best include a contemporary
revival of the USDA's 1941-45 "Hemp for Victory" program that was
implemented in spite of the 1937 fraud on the American Congress and people
by which hemp was outlawed as marijuana. http://www.jackherer.com
http://www.chrisconrad.com

With the US now beginning to commit itself to another "Vietnam War", in
Columbia striving for oil resources access/protection while deploying
purportedly ongoing Iran/Contra-style CIA drugwar strategies/skullduggery
http://www.egroups.com/message/global-peace-walk/318 in this year of High
Level Oil Prices & DrugWar Electioneering, all these issues need to be
reexamined carefully in light of hidden history coming to light
http://www.copvcia.com


-----Original Message-----
From: carl.wiggins@... <carl.wiggins@...>
To: greenbuilding@... <greenbuilding@...>; green-power@...
<green-power@...>
Date: Friday, April 07, 2000 1:56 PM
Subject: GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan


>YOUR TURN: COMMENT ON OUR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE.
>A draft copy of
STRENGTH THROUGH SCIENCE: POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY, the
> Energy Departments strategic plan is available on the world wide web for
> public comment through Monday, April 10.  This draft will evolve into a
> final Strategic Plan through consultation with you. DOE plans to publish a
> final version of the plan this Spring with your help. This document
> outlines the agencys long-term directions and policies. It establishes the
> mission, objectives, performance goals and strategies for the department.
> It is available at www.doe.gov/strategic_plan
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
_
>This discussion group is sponsored in part by:
>* Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology,
http://www.crest.org
>* Global Environmental Options, http://www.geonetwork.org
>Archives and related documents can be found at at:
http://www.green-power.com
>


From: David Crockett Williams <gear2000@...>
To: EarthDay2000 Chris Curtis <ccurtis@...>
Cc: Baseline Mansion <BaselineMansion@...>; *Global Peace Walk Project
<GPZone2000@...>
Subject: Clean-Energy Campaign 2000
Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 9:41 PM

From: David Crockett Williams <gear2000@...>
To: Nader for President <info@...>
Cc: Integrity Research Institute <iri@...>; Evan Soule'
<josephnewman@...>; Brian O'Leary <oleary@...>; Hal Fox
<halfox@...>; Eugene Mallove - IE Mag.
<editor@...>; Thomas Bearden <bearden@...>; Moray King
<mbking@...>; Fred B. Wood Sr. <csiri@...>; Randell Mills
<RMills@...>; Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@...>; Andrew
Mount <andros@...>; Adam Trombly <iasa@...>
Subject: Important: New-Energy Science can win Presidency
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 1:24 PM

Dear Nader for President Campaign 2000, Green Party, Mr. Ralph Nader, et al:

I saw Ralph Nader on CSPAN yesterday speaking at University of Maryland
College Park, listened carefully to his message and responses to
questioners, and suggest you read very carefully the extremely important
information below which can help greatly the success of his US Presidential
Campaign and/or the campaign of any understanding candidate.

I am emailing to suggest strongly that he investigate and include in his
Presidential Campaign issue under the banner of "Clean Energy Now!"
(EarthDay2000 slogan) the need for adequate funding to finish the research
and development on the new so-called "free-energy" or "new-energy"
technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, as for example, one
class of which (devices to harness the "Zero Point Energy" field of the
space in which matter resides) made passing mention on p.57 in the public
comments section of the new national energy policy plan (CNES Comprehensive
National Energy Strategy http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html ) prepared by
the DOE and submitted to Congress in 1998 to address Kyoto protocol goals
for US energy industry carbon emissions to ameliorate global climate change.
In addition, in a formal scientific letter to our representative ordered by
then Energy Secretary Pena, in May 1998 the DOE acknowledged the existence
of the Zero Point Energy field and called such potential devices to harness
it the "Holy Grail of energy research" (for details and copy of this DOE
letter, see story and follow links from "energy" button at bottom of
http://www.prop1.org ).

Further, I would strongly urge Mr. Nader to consult on this matter with
those cc'd above including former astronaut and physicist/astronomer Dr.
Brian O'Leary (cc above) who was the science and energy policy advisor and
speechwriter to four previous US presidential candidates (beginning with
Udall and ending with Jackson) before in recent years becoming familiar with
many of these new energy technologies and their inventors/researchers and
then writing a popular book about them called "Miracle in the Void" and the
foreword to Canadian journalist Jeane Manning's book on some of these
inventions and researchers called "The Coming Energy Revolution".  (I
suggest you start with Appendix II in O'Leary's book which is a speech of
his from 1994 with good overview, entitled "Green Power")
http://www.maui.net/~oleary

A "flip-side" benefit to one class of this new genre of fuel-less energy
technologies, a class (related to what was initially labeled "cold fusion"
and then suppressed/debunked publicly before the last decade of quiet
serious research has shown its underlying working principles proven sound)
including labels of "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" and "High Density Charge
Clusters", has actually demonstrated the ability to neutralize radioactive
wastes rapidly as was shown on ABC Good Morning America news in early June
1997 where the radioactivity of uranium was reduced over half in less than
two hours by the Patterson Power Cell.   Dr. Mallove's Infinite Energy
Magazine http://www.infinite-energy.com and the peer reviewed publications
of the Institute for New Energy edited by Hal Fox http://www.padrak.com/ine
provide additional and more technical details on latest research in these
areas.

I suspect that Mr. Nader has the experience and background to appreciate the
government/corporate dynamics factors which have been hindering the
development of these new energy technologies over the past two decades of my
interest and involvement in this area of research.   He may also appreciate
the reference in Jeane Manning's book to the government secrecy orders under
which she claims these new developments are being ordered secret and
suppressed, austensibly for national security reasons but apparently to
protect entrenched corporate profiteering and energy industry global
economics and governments control.

For additional references among cc's above for more information you may also
want to check with Col. Bearden and Moray King regarding details on Zero
Point Energy perspectives on this new science;  with Thomas Valone of
Integrity Research Institute there in Washington DC
<http://users.erols.com/iri>
who has done some conferences there on this topic;  with Randell Mills of
Blacklight Power <http://www.blacklightpower.com>; with systems theory and
radar pioneer Dr. Fred B. Wood, Sr.,
<http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/fwood.html> who is worried about
secrecy policies on this new science as relates to covert advanced
electromagnetic weaponry potentially under development by the US and perhaps
even more advanced in countries hostile to the US;  and with Dr. Jack
Sarfatti who with the support of former US West CEO Joseph Firmage is making
rapid progress via global internetwork of researchers on the advanced
theoretical physics of new energy and vacuum propulsion technologies
especially as connected to physics of consciousness research and
investigation of purported reverse engineering of UFO technologies
<http://www.stardrive.org>.   Mr. Firmage's new personal assistant, Andrew
Mount, was for 9 years the personal assistant of the late Bruce DePalma
whose research leading to the 1979 tests of the n-Machine "free-energy
generator" mentioned on p.57 of DOE's CNES http://www.depalma.pair.com also
has antigravity technology implications.   He and Adam Trombly with Project
Earth <http://www.projectearth.com>, who patented internationally one Zero
Point Energy generator, both reported death threats since the early 1980's
over suppression of this new science.

Although this new energy science is still very controversial since the
experimental results have not yet been reconciled in the "mainstream
scientific establishment" with commonly accepted 20th century theoretical
physics (eg, <http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/9951/baard.shtml>),
nevertheless I strongly urge you to consider the underlying potential and
voluminous evidence available and insist that this topic become more deeply
investigated and that it become a main topic of discussion in this year's
Presidential and Congressional elections.

Nowhere is this controversy more evident, and the lack of common agreement
among these new energy researchers as to how all these different results and
theories can be understood in common terms, than in the work over the last
three decades of inventor Joseph Newman from Mississippi now living near
Phoenix, Arizona <http://www.josephnewman.com>.  His experimental results on
the Newman Energy Machine, contrary to Mr. Newman's theoretical
understandings, seem to some influential scientists as "violating the laws
of physics".  Even so, he gained sufficient testimonies from top scientists
who witnessed tests of his energy machine that by the 1980's he earned the
support of the Republican Congressional Caucus and 11 different Members of
the House of Representatives separately introduced (unsuccessful) bills into
Congress to give him a patent by congressional act to over-ride an
intransigent US Patent Office's refusal.  Today he is marketing a production
model of his energy machine apparently under NAFTA-guaranteed foreign patent
protection.  [note/addendum of 7Apr00:  Correct or not, Mr. Newman's
theoretical understanding of how his generator works is by converting a
small amount of matter (copper?) into a large amount of electricity in his
device, which sounds a lot better than doing this with uranium or plutonium
in nuclear reactors]

Please ask Mr. Nader and his staff to carefully and thoroughly investigate
this information as soon as possible.  He is in a position, by his candidacy
now gaining momentum for the US Presidency, to insert this information into
the national election arena and compel all candidates and the public to push
for rapid implemetation of this new science which has the potential to help
end energy industry pollutions, more fairly restructure the global economy,
and help ameliorate global environmental threats before it is too late to
save all life on Earth from otherwise certain destruction.

Finally, I would invite Mr. Nader to offer his letter of support for Global
Peace Walk 2000 with his message which this walk to Washington DC and the
United Nations can help publicize and carry for delivery with other such
messages in Washington DC and to the United Nations for its 55th anniversary
and to help inaugurate the UN Year and Decade of Creating a Culture of Peace
for the 21st Century.  Since Global Peace Walk 2000 will be conducting en
route its annual April 22nd event in Taos, New Mexico, as one of the many
global EarthDay2000 events, as soon as we receive Mr. Nader's letter we
would like to send it to all the EarthDay network organizers and ask that
they copy it and references to above new "Clean Energy Now!" information to
their EarthDay2000 event attendees.

With the support of some of those cc'd above we are planning to have a major
conference on these new energy technologies in Washington DC toward the end
of the first week of October just preceding the walk's arrival there for a
ceremony October 9th to rededicate the Washington Monument as a symbol of
the message of peace.

We hope you will commit to attend this ceremony and that those receiving
this post will help us achieve the goal of gathering over one million people
for that ceremony including prominent politicial officeholders and
candidates.

With my fervent prayers for your serious consideration and response to the
above suggestions as soon as possible, and appreciating your website at
http://www.votenader.com,

Sincerely,

CLEAN-ENERGY CAMPAIGN 2000

David Crockett Williams  gear2000@...
Bachelor of Science, Chemistry (CSUN, CA, 1969)
Chartered Life Underwriter (American College, PA, 1971)

Independent Candidate for United States President 2000
Leonard Peltier, Vice Presidential Candidate
USCampaign   gear2000@...
http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier

GLOBAL  EMERGENCY  ALERT  RESPONSE
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Global Peace Walk 2000
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html
Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts

The Vision of Paradise on Earth
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

**Support HR 2545:
Global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act
Details & Email:  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm
Sign letters to senators  http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate
and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter

Easy index to email Congress & Media
http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd
(copy & paste email letters to media and Congress)

An Agenda for Peace
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Bearden" <soliton@...>
To: <StrategicPlan@...>
Cc: "House Committee on Science" <science.committee@...
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Second Technical Input for Vacuum Energy Section of DOE Strategic
Plan


>
>
> Subj: Comments and Second Technical Input for Vacuum Energy Section of DOE
> Strategic Plan
> TO:  Department of Energy Date: April 9, 2000
> StrategicPlan@...
>
> From: Tom Bearden
> CEO, CTEC Inc.
> Director, Association of Distinguished American Scientists
> Fellow Emeritus, Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study
> Soliton@...
>
>
> Dear DOE Strategic Energy Plan Manager:
>
> This is the second of two technical inputs submitted today for
consideration
> in the Strategic Energy Plan.  These two inputs may be of great
importance.
> Attached above is the second input, which is my formal paper, "On
Extracting
> Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum," already accepted in absentia at
the
> IC-2000 Congress in Russia later this year.  The paper will be published
by
> the conference organizers in the proceedings and on the Internet, and also
> on a CD-ROM.
>
> The paper dramatically alters the view of how electromagnetic circuits are
> powered.
>
> Indeed, all electrical circuits and loads are now and always have been
> powered by EM energy extracted from the active vacuum by the negative
> resistor source dipole, once formed in the generator or battery.  The
energy
> furnished to the shaft of generators or available as chemical energy in
> batteries does not power the external circuit.  All that the input shaft
> energy or available chemical energy does is perform work upon the internal
> charges to separate them and form the source dipole.
>
> Generators and batteries form source dipoles, nothing else.
>
> For more than 40 years in particle physics it has been proven both
> theoretically and experimentally that every dipole is a broken symmetry in
> the vacuum flux.  By the definition of broken symmetry, this means that
the
> dipole, once formed, extracts and organizes absorbed disordered virtual
> vacuum energy and re-emits it as organized, observable EM energy flow.
> Nobel prizes were awarded for the discovery of broken symmetry, but
> electrodynamics and EM power system theory has never been changed to
reflect
> how the external circuit is really powered.
>
> In the paper we discuss some long-needed corrections to serious flaws in
the
> present electrodynamics.  We also give more than a dozen areas in which EM
> systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium in their exchange with the
active
> vacuum can be developed.  A few of these can be developed in fairly
> straightforward manner by a funded and competent laboratory team.
>
> The first technical input, just submitted, explains the proven Bedini
method
> for creating and using negative resistors in storage batteries.  This is a
> proven methodology, where real systems have been built.  Some replications
> have been successfully made by others such as Nelson and Watson.  The
Bedini
> method can be further developed to make electrical self-powered automobile
> motor/generators in straightforward manner, where the batteries contain
> negative resistors extracting the EM energy directly from the vacuum, and
> powering the motor while also recharging the battery.
>
> The flawed classical electrodynamics used by electrical power system
> designers does not incorporate the active vacuum exchange with the system,
> but erroneously considers source charges as perpetual motion machines
> creating from nothing all that energy in their fields and potentials
> reaching across the universe.  Consequently present EM power system
> designers have no notion at all of how to produce EM power systems that
> freely extract energy directly from the vacuum and use it to power the
> circuit.  In short, present theory has no notion at all of how to easily
> produce open EM power systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium in their
> vacuum exchange.  Yet this is one of the easiest things in all the world
to
> do, even though presently our universities and research laboratories have
> not the foggiest notion of how to do it.
>
> The O(3) internal symmetry non-Abelian gauge-theoretic electrodynamics
being
> developed by AIAS theoreticians (and others as well) can indeed
substantiate
> that vacuum energy currents are present and do interact with systems.
Both
> the Poynting and Heaviside components of the energy flow are captured by
> Evans in that theory.  More than 70 formal AIAS scientific papers are
> already carried on a DOE website.  About 20 have been published in
journals
> such as Foundations of Physics, and about a dozen others are in the
referee
> process presently.
>
> Also, I point out that the original point-contact transistor often
produced
> true negative resistors, in that the output current moved against the
> voltage.  Negative resistors based on the point-contact resistor can be
> developed readily by any competent team skilled in constructing
> semiconductors.  Self-powering circuits using them can then be developed.
> The low power output of the point-contact transistor can be alleviated by
> using multiple point contacts.
>
> In the attached paper we also correct the present serious non sequitur in
> electrical power system theory where it is erroneously supposed that the
> shaft energy input to a generator or the chemical energy available in a
> battery powers the external circuit.  To the contrary, all the energy
> available to the generator or to the battery is dissipated only to perform
> work upon the internal charges to separate them and form the negative
> resistor source dipole.  Again, the only thing that generators and
batteries
> do is form source dipoles.
>
> Every source dipole and in fact every potential formed in a circuit is a
> negative resistor that interacts with the entire vacuum potential and
> organizes it.  We explain how that occurs, and cite Whittaker's 1903 paper
> demonstrating the basic vacuum organization by a "scalar" potential.
>
> Once formed, the source dipole extracts enormous energy from the
> negentropically organized vacuum, and outputs that energy as the energy
flow
> pouring out of the terminals and filling all space around the external
> circuit.  The basis for that has been known in particle physics for nearly
a
> half-century, but it is still missing from the flawed 136 years old
> classical EM.  In a nominal circuit, this energy flow from the negative
> resistor source dipole is some 10exp13 times as great in magnitude as is
the
> tiny Poynting component along the wires that is actually intercepted by
the
> surface charges in the circuit, and diverged into the wires to power the
> circuit.  H.A. Lorentz originated a method of simply discarding the
> remaining enormous nondiverged Heaviside component of the energy flow,
which
> misses the single-pass circuit and is just wasted.  Modern
> electrodynamicists continue to ignore this immediately available huge
source
> of energy surrounding every circuit, and account only for the feeble
> Poynting component actually intercepted by the surface charges and
diverged
> into the circuit to power it.
>
> Any negative resistor formed in the circuit can extract excess energy from
> the usually nondiverged Heaviside energy flow component already available
to
> every circuit but ignored by electrodynamicists.  In the paper we give
> numerous methods by which extra vacuum energy can be extracted from the
> immediately available and enormous Heaviside energy flow component and
sent
> down the circuit to power it.
>
> All the coal, oil, and natural gas ever burned in electrical power plants
> has not directly placed a single watt on the power line.  Instead, the
> energy produced from all that hydrocarbon combustion has all been
dissipated
> in the generator to form the dipole, which the inane design of the system
> keeps destroying faster than it powers the loads.
>
> The energy crisis and hydrocarbon combustion pollution of the planet can
be
> solved rather quickly, for much less than the cost of a single ordinary
> electric power plant and in a period of three years or less.  We have
never
> had an "energy" problem, and we have no energy problem today.  We have an
> "energy flow intercepting and collecting" problem, and also a problem of
> eliminating the arbitrary Lorentz symmetrical discharge of the circuit
> excitation in the conventional closed current loop circuit.  Both problems
> are not difficult to solve.
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> Tom Bearden
> CEO, CTEC Inc.
> Director, Association of Distinguished American Scientists
> Fellow Emeritus, Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study
> Soliton@...
>
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Bearden" <soliton@...>
To: <StrategicPlan@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2000 9:04 PM
Subject: Technical Input for Vacuum Energy Section of DOE Strategic Plan


>
>
> Subj: Comments and Technical Input for Vacuum Energy Section of DOE
> Strategic Plan
> TO:  Department of Energy Date: April 9, 2000
> StrategicPlan@...
>
> From: Tom Bearden
> CEO, CTEC Inc.
> Director, Association of Distinguished American Scientists
> Fellow Emeritus, Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study
> Soliton@...
>
>
> Dear DOE Strategic Energy Plan Manager:
>
> I would like to make two technical inputs for consideration in the
Strategic
> Energy Plan that may be of great importance.  Attached above is the first
> input, which by permission I am providing.  The second input, to follow,
is
> my formal paper, "On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum,"
> which has been accepted in absentia at the IC-2000 Congress in Russia
later
> this year, will be published by the conference organizers in the
proceedings
> and on the Internet, and also on a CD-ROM.
>
> Bedini's novel method gives a simple and straightforward means of
producing
> a negative resistor inside a lead-acid storage battery, and
negentropically
> organizing the local vacuum as well.  It is then readily possible to
receive
> excess energy into the circuit from the organized active vacuum, via the
> negative resistor.  A permissible open system far from thermodynamic
> equilibrium with the active vacuum environment results.  As is well-known
in
> the thermodynamics of open systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium with
> their active environment, such a system is permitted to (1) self-organize,
> (2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the
operator
> inputs (the excess energy is just freely received from the environment,
(4)
> power itself and its load simultaneously (all the energy is just freely
> received from the environment, and (5) exhibit negentropy.
>
> Bedini's negative resistor method has demonstrated all five of the above
> features in various devices.  Working devices having COP>1.0 are readily
> possible and have been built by Bedini and replicated by several other
> researchers such as Watson and Nelson.  With sufficiently accurate timing,
> economical self-powering devices which power themselves and their loads
are
> also straightforward and have been built; one having run for 2 years.
>
> The Bedini method is fully explained in the attachment to this message.
>
> The classical electrodynamics used by electrical power system designers
does
> not even incorporate the active vacuum exchange with the system, but
> erroneously considers the source charges as perpetual motion machines
> creating from nothing all that energy in their fields and potentials
> reaching across the universe.  Consequently present EM power system
> designers have no notion at all of how to create and use true negative
> resistors in their circuits so that the negative resistors extract energy
> directly from the vacuum and insert it into the circuit.  Yet this is one
of
> the easiest things in all the world to do, even though presently our
> universities and research laboratories have not the foggiest notion of how
> to do it.
>
> Also, I point out that the original point-contact transistor often
produced
> true negative resistors, in that the output current moved against the
> voltage.  Negative resistors based on the point-contact resistor should be
> developed readily by any competent team skilled in constructing
> semiconductors.  Self-powering circuits using them can be developed.  The
> low power output of the transistor can be alleviated by using multiple
point
> contacts.
>
> We also correct the present serious non sequitur in electrical power
system
> theory where it is erroneously supposed that the shaft energy input to a
> generator or the chemical energy available in a battery powers the
external
> circuit.  To the contrary, all the energy available to the generator or to
> the battery is dissipated only to perform work upon the internal charges
to
> separate them and form the negative resistor source dipole.  The only
thing
> that generators and batteries do is form source dipoles.
>
> Once formed, the source dipole extracts enormous energy from the
> negentropically organized vacuum, and outputs that energy as the energy
flow
> pouring out of the terminals and filling all space around the external
> circuit.  The basis for that has been known in particle physics for nearly
a
> half-century, but it is still missing from the flawed 136 years old
> classical EM.  In a nominal circuit, this energy flow from the negative
> resistor source dipole is some 10exp13 times as great in magnitude as is
the
> tiny Poynting component along the wires that is actually intercepted by
the
> surface charges in the circuit, and diverged into the wires to power the
> circuit.  H.A. Lorentz originated a method of simply discarding the
> remaining enormous nondiverged Heaviside component of the energy flow,
which
> misses the single-pass circuit and is just wasted.  Modern
> electrodynamicists continue to ignore this immediately available huge
source
> of energy surrounding every circuit.
>
> Any negative resistor formed in the circuit then extracts excess energy
from
> the usually nondiverged Heaviside energy flow component available to every
> circuit but ignored by electrodynamicists.  In the paper for the Russian
> conference (to follow by another message), we give numerous methods by
which
> extra vacuum energy can be extracted from the immediately available and
> enormous Heaviside energy flow component and sent down the circuit to
power
> it.
>
> Every electrical load is now and always has been powered by EM energy
> extracted directly from the vacuum by the source dipole, once formed.  All
> the coal, oil, and natural gas ever burned in electrical power plants has
> not directly placed a single watt on the power line.  Instead, the energy
> produced from all that hydrocarbon combustion has all been dissipated in
the
> generator to form the dipole, which the inane design of the system keeps
> destroying faster than it powers the loads.
>
> The energy crisis and hydrocarbon combustion pollution of the planet can
be
> solved rather quickly, for much less than the cost of a single ordinary
> electric power plant and in a period of three years or less.  The Bedini
> method is eminently practical and will result in economically priced units
> of various sizes, which can readily be mass manufactured in conventional
> manufacturing facilities.
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> Tom Bearden
> CEO, CTEC Inc.
> Director, Association of Distinguished American Scientists
> Fellow Emeritus, Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study
> Soliton@...
>
>