Hi Don,
Thanks for your time to reply. Do you suggest any alternative which will help
me to model the submitted data as XML with the power of validataion ?

Thanks.

----- Original Message ----
From: Don Brown <mrdon@...>
To: struts-xsl@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2006 1:41:51 AM
Subject: Re: [struts-xsl] Re: Model with repeat tag!

To be honest, I kinda gave up working on that stuff,
as I didn't see as much
benefit as I had originally. If you have any improvements, post and patch and
I'll apply it.

Don

it_hari wrote:
>
>
> Atlast, myself found a way.....
> I created form fields like "/m:test/m:internet [1]/m:email" and
> "/m:test/m:internet [2]/m:email" which helped me to create the required
> DOM..i guess this is what Don was trying to tell us.
>
> But i still have getting this working with JDOM implementation of
> AbstractFactory - with DOMForm it works fine! Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- In struts-xsl@yahoogro ups.com <mailto:struts- xsl%40yahoogroup s.com>,
> "it_hari" <it_hari@... > wrote:
> >
> > Adding to this, i found in one of the threads Don suggesting :
> >
> > "With a recent improvement in JXPath (included in the latest stxx
> > release believe), you now don't have to specify your model at at all
> > - JXPath will build the JDom/DOM element just by creating elements and
> > attributes if they don't already exist."
> >
> > Please let me know how to achieve the above. I have jxpath version 1.1.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --- In struts-xsl@yahoogro ups.com
> <mailto:struts- xsl%40yahoogroup s.com>, "it_hari" <it_hari@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > I wanted my form data to be transfered something like:
> > > <data>
> > > <user>
> > > <name>test1< /name>
> > > <age>20</age>
> > > </user>
> > > <user>
> > > <name>test2< /name>
> > > <age>20</age>
> > > </user>
> > > <user>
> > > <name>test3< /name>
> > > <age>20</age>
> > > </user>
> > > </data>
> > >
> > > In such a case, how shall i define my model layout in xmlforms-models
> > > file ? Is this achievable ?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
>
>








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]