Hello, I have three papers that may be of interest to members of this list. I would appreciate any comments, and please send them to me off list. PDF's can be...
I didn't realize that you had to join the SSRN site to download the papers. You can also download the papers here: http://jeff.oneill.googlepages.com/home ...
Hi everybody I happened upon the eSTV system whilst surfing the net and it seems a good idea in introducing democracy to a very apathetic group/housing system....
None of the above. Some months ago, Brian White advocated the "None of the above" option on a ballot paper. ( How is that outrageously unequal double-60...
Actually I made the case for none of the below, Brian ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the...
************************** From: Simon Gazeley, 134 London Road West, Bath, BA1 7DD 01225 852397; 07962 666812 Sent: 22 May 2006 09:06 To: David Neale; Tania...
A big victory culminates phase 1 of the campaign in Minneapolis. Tony Solgård, President FairVote Minnesota PO Box 19440 Minneapolis MN 55419 (763) 807-2550 ...
I guess it is a start but IRV is just one member elected from any area, is it not? So, it is not really a breakthrough. In a homogenous population, a single...
Dear Tony Solgard and Fair Vote Minnesota, Dont get people's hopes up too much about IRV. It is the proportional counting of the preference vote - the two...
Two questions Tony and the Better Ballot Campaign in Minneapolis need to ask themselves are: (1) Are there specific circumstances that make IRV a winnable...
Iād like to assure everyone that Iām one of the āilluminatiā with regard to the merits of PR/STV versus the single-winner application. Iād urge you...
My apologies to Tony and his colleagues for entirely missing the references to the Park Board, Library Board and so on in the Q&A section of the website. The...
The amendment recommended by the council is a slightly amended form of what we had been campaigning for by petition, which is second on the list at ...
For better or worse, the term "Instant Runoff Voting" has progressed farthest into common nomenclature and we chose to use it, blurring the distinction between...
Has anyone ever proposed combining STV with MMP? I am developing a voting system proposal that works as follows: The State is divided into districts with a...
... a ... Never mind how it might work, the real question is (or should be), why on earth would anyone want to do such a thing? STV-PR and MMP have completely...
... Why would anyone want to taint a system giving voters true free choice of candidates with a discredited party list system? Colin Rosenstiel...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Jun 4, 2006 12:29 am
1239
Hi all, I'm new to this list, but I worked on the Yes campaign for STV in BC last year and am now a director with Fair Voting BC. In collaboration with Dave...
I suggest 3 seat stv with the mmp component being the almost 25% whose vote contribute to the final losing candidate. (all other votes have elected people so ...
Re the suggestions to combine STV with MMP in British Columbia, arent we forgetting that the Citizens Assembly made their decision after a year's work on the...
... and we ... multi-winner elections. ... There is a delightful "reverse take" on this use of "IRV" to embrace both STV in single-winner elections and STV-PR...
... proportionality down ... Take a look at some real results from real STV-PR elections and real MMP elections and I think you'll see that this concern about...
Thanks to Brian, James and Richard for their comments. I absolutely agree with James that STV in practice ends up being extremely proportional. In the...
... voters who ... than "I'll let ... Antony, be very careful what you wish for or else you might find your "STV" has been perverted into a closed party list...
... This is seriously overestimated by people who don't allow for variations in votes between constituencies. All representation systems have a trade-off...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Jun 4, 2006 10:14 pm
1247
... This is the nonsense which totally destroys to point of STV that voters choose what they think parties comprise and not the parties themselves. To be fair...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Jun 4, 2006 10:14 pm
1248
Hi James, Thanks for your comments. I'm fully aware of the Australian travesty. That's why under STVR the vote is interpreted as a division of your ballot...