Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
stv-voting · Single Tranferable Vote (STV)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1219 - 1248 of 1482   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1219
Hello, I have three papers that may be of interest to members of this list. I would appreciate any comments, and please send them to me off list. PDF's can be...
Jeffrey O'Neill
jeff_c_o
Offline Send Email
Feb 25, 2006
6:54 pm
1220
I didn't realize that you had to join the SSRN site to download the papers. You can also download the papers here: http://jeff.oneill.googlepages.com/home ...
Jeffrey O'Neill
jeff_c_o
Offline Send Email
Feb 27, 2006
10:58 pm
1221
I was able to read the papers, at least the one on computer counting without joining......
Winston Ewert
winstonewert
Offline Send Email
Feb 27, 2006
11:01 pm
1222
Hi everybody I happened upon the eSTV system whilst surfing the net and it seems a good idea in introducing democracy to a very apathetic group/housing system....
gradkblogs
Offline Send Email
Apr 19, 2006
6:54 pm
1223
None of the above. Some months ago, Brian White advocated the "None of the above" option on a ballot paper. ( How is that outrageously unequal double-60...
Richard Lung
democracysci...
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2006
9:52 pm
1224
I made the case for a "none of the above" option in my paper on optical scan ballots: http://gregdennis.com/voting/ballot_design.pdf Greg...
Greg Dennis
progressnerd
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2006
4:24 pm
1225
Actually I made the case for none of the below, Brian ... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the...
Brian White
gaiatechnician
Offline Send Email
May 18, 2006
6:26 am
1226
************************** From: Simon Gazeley, 134 London Road West, Bath, BA1 7DD 01225 852397; 07962 666812 Sent: 22 May 2006 09:06 To: David Neale; Tania...
Simon Gazeley
simongazeley
Offline Send Email
May 22, 2006
9:26 pm
1227
Read this: http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/invitation.asp Do not forward virus warnings, they are almost always hoaxes. Winston Ewert...
Winston Ewert
winstonewert
Offline Send Email
May 22, 2006
9:33 pm
1228
A big victory culminates phase 1 of the campaign in Minneapolis. Tony Solgård, President FairVote Minnesota PO Box 19440 Minneapolis MN 55419 (763) 807-2550 ...
Tony Solgård
tonysolgard
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2006
4:10 am
1229
I guess it is a start but IRV is just one member elected from any area, is it not? So, it is not really a breakthrough. In a homogenous population, a single...
Brian White
gaiatechnician
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2006
5:21 am
1230
Dear Tony Solgard and Fair Vote Minnesota, Dont get people's hopes up too much about IRV. It is the proportional counting of the preference vote - the two...
Richard Lung
democracysci...
Offline Send Email
May 29, 2006
8:12 pm
1231
Two questions Tony and the Better Ballot Campaign in Minneapolis need to ask themselves are: (1) Are there specific circumstances that make IRV a winnable...
Bob Richard
r9j8r7
Offline Send Email
May 29, 2006
8:43 pm
1232
I’d like to assure everyone that I’m one of the ā€illuminatiā€ with regard to the merits of PR/STV versus the single-winner application. I’d urge you...
Tony Solgard
tonysolgard
Offline Send Email
May 30, 2006
12:35 am
1233
My apologies to Tony and his colleagues for entirely missing the references to the Park Board, Library Board and so on in the Q&A section of the website. The...
Bob Richard
r9j8r7
Offline Send Email
May 30, 2006
2:05 pm
1234
The amendment recommended by the council is a slightly amended form of what we had been campaigning for by petition, which is second on the list at ...
Tony Solgard
tonysolgard
Offline Send Email
May 30, 2006
2:34 pm
1235
For better or worse, the term "Instant Runoff Voting" has progressed farthest into common nomenclature and we chose to use it, blurring the distinction between...
Richard Lung
democracysci...
Offline Send Email
May 31, 2006
8:11 pm
1236
Has anyone ever proposed combining STV with MMP? I am developing a voting system proposal that works as follows: The State is divided into districts with a...
jeff_1972_sehs
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
9:12 pm
1237
... a ... Never mind how it might work, the real question is (or should be), why on earth would anyone want to do such a thing? STV-PR and MMP have completely...
James Gilmour
jgilmour2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 3, 2006
10:53 pm
1238
... Why would anyone want to taint a system giving voters true free choice of candidates with a discredited party list system? Colin Rosenstiel...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
12:29 am
1239
Hi all, I'm new to this list, but I worked on the Yes campaign for STV in BC last year and am now a director with Fair Voting BC. In collaboration with Dave...
Antony Hodgson
antonyjhodgson
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
4:58 am
1240
I suggest 3 seat stv with the mmp component being the almost 25% whose vote contribute to the final losing candidate. (all other votes have elected people so ...
Brian White
gaiatechnician
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
8:17 am
1241
Re the suggestions to combine STV with MMP in British Columbia, arent we forgetting that the Citizens Assembly made their decision after a year's work on the...
Richard Lung
democracysci...
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
1:57 pm
1242
... and we ... multi-winner elections. ... There is a delightful "reverse take" on this use of "IRV" to embrace both STV in single-winner elections and STV-PR...
James Gilmour
jgilmour2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
2:00 pm
1243
... proportionality down ... Take a look at some real results from real STV-PR elections and real MMP elections and I think you'll see that this concern about...
James Gilmour
jgilmour2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
2:10 pm
1244
Thanks to Brian, James and Richard for their comments. I absolutely agree with James that STV in practice ends up being extremely proportional. In the...
Antony Hodgson
antonyjhodgson
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
3:02 pm
1245
... voters who ... than "I'll let ... Antony, be very careful what you wish for or else you might find your "STV" has been perverted into a closed party list...
James Gilmour
jgilmour2001
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
10:02 pm
1246
... This is seriously overestimated by people who don't allow for variations in votes between constituencies. All representation systems have a trade-off...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
10:14 pm
1247
... This is the nonsense which totally destroys to point of STV that voters choose what they think parties comprise and not the parties themselves. To be fair...
Colin Rosenstiel
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
10:14 pm
1248
Hi James, Thanks for your comments. I'm fully aware of the Australian travesty. That's why under STVR the vote is interpreted as a division of your ballot...
Antony Hodgson
antonyjhodgson
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2006
10:40 pm
Messages 1219 - 1248 of 1482   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help