Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
stv-voting · Single Tranferable Vote (STV)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 141 - 170 of 1482   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
141
In the post that triggered this particular discussion, Deane wrote: " At the moment we still have to fight to get the method of transferring surpluses...
jgilmour2001
Offline Send Email
Jan 1, 2002
7:15 pm
142
01/02/02 - Two Standards to Evaluate STV: Greetings List, Joe seems to be having trouble on how to evaluate design features that are added to STV. Well, this...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2002
6:47 am
143
... I too worry about this idea of going back on long past transfers in transferring surpluses. It fails to understand the principles of STV in ways that are...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 2, 2002
9:58 pm
144
Dear List-- Check out section 273 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. It should be at the AEC site mentioned by James. In the Electoral Reform Bill that...
Steve Todd
toddles51
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2002
2:55 am
145
With respect to James's suggestion for rule comparisons, the Proportional Representation Society of Australia has put up their Hare-Clark rules on the web. It...
Renato V Aguila
renpaul2@...
Send Email
Jan 3, 2002
12:48 pm
146
Since my email about the Australian situation on December 24, I have been away from my computer for some days and am only now catching up. My apologies for...
Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
crows20022002
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2002
6:39 am
147
Greetings List, ... Dear Steve, Thank you for posting these rules and your example. The problem seems to be a misuse of the rules, for the rules seem to be...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 5, 2002
3:19 pm
148
DearList-- I think the drafting mistake is in the paragraph, partially reproduced here, that reads-- ... particularly the words between the two sets of ***....
Steve Todd
toddles51
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2002
11:36 pm
149
01/07/02 - Possible Correction to my last post: Greetings List, There may be a possible correction needed to my last post. In the post I said that only 181...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 7, 2002
6:13 am
150
Re what I termed "averaging the values of all votes", perhaps I should explain with an example. If the quota is 37 votes, and Candidate B gets 10 first...
Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
crows20022002
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2002
1:18 am
151
01/08/02 - Disappearing Surplus Votes: Greetings List, Steve wrote: "I think the drafting mistake is in the paragraph, partially reproduced here, that reads--"...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 8, 2002
10:04 am
152
01/09/02 - Deane's Excellent Example: Dear Deane, Thank you for the excellent example of averaging. I fully agree that surplus votes should not be divided by...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 9, 2002
11:25 am
153
... If a candidate was already elected then any votes transferred in an exclusion or other surplus transfer would leapfrog them. Only Meek does otherwise. You...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 10, 2002
12:14 am
154
01/11/02 - Consistent Treatment of Surpluses: Greetings List, Colin wrote: "The transfer of a consequential surplus is merely the completion of the transfer...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 11, 2002
7:36 am
155
The hand counting restriction is unavoidable in public elections. You cannot have a "black box" counting process if adequate scrutiny is to be possible. You...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 11, 2002
8:49 am
156
Hi, Donald-- A couple of quick reactions inserted. ... Steve [Sat 12] I would agree with you if the other candidate received 25.9 votes, but he doesn't. The...
Steve Todd
toddles51
Offline Send Email
Jan 12, 2002
2:07 am
157
I am not sure you could call averaging one of STV's "dirty little secrets". Regrettably it appears to have been an Australian invention! I guess it shows that...
Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
crows20022002
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2002
3:49 am
158
01/14/02 - Transfers to one thousandth of a vote: Hi, Steve, you wrote: "I would agree with you if the other candidate received 25.9 votes, but he doesn't....
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 14, 2002
10:57 am
159
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the stv-voting group. File :...
stv-voting@yahoogroup...
Send Email
Jan 19, 2002
2:40 am
160
Hi, Donald-- I pretty much agree with you this time. Fortunately, Meek's method overcomes these minor flaws in both the Hare-Clark and Northern Ireland rules....
Steve Todd
toddles51
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2002
3:00 am
161
... From: "Tom Ruen" <tomruen@...> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:39:36 -0600 Subject: [IRV-freewheeling] STV for corporate board elections Today the...
donald@...
Send Email
Jan 20, 2002
7:16 pm
162
I would recommend following the rules at http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/sep/votingsystems/stvrules.htm with each stockholder casting a number of votes...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 20, 2002
9:13 pm
163
Dear Tom: I would agree with Colin (Rosenstiel) that you should use the ERS 1997 rules as a start. These rules are in use throughout the UK, especially for...
Renato V Aguila
renpaul2@...
Send Email
Jan 21, 2002
8:58 am
164
... ... I think this is a good recommendation. It is much better to adopt a widely used set of rules wholesale than to start picking and choosing what quota, ...
Joe Otten
jowot
Offline Send Email
Jan 22, 2002
12:32 am
165
Dear Joe and Others, I agree that following standard rules is a good idea. Still, I must consider some questions. My current most important question arises...
Tom Ruen
tomruen
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2002
4:34 am
166
... This is bizarre. The voter is choosing their representative. It would be perverse to vote for and against their chosen candidate. Colin Rosenstiel...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 23, 2002
9:09 am
167
Colin, It seems that I may live in a different world than STV people. CV is a different world certainly. If I really like 2 candidates and have no real...
Tom Ruen
tomruen
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2002
8:16 pm
168
STV is a method of achieving representative democracy, meaning that a voter can only be entitled to choose one representative. In practice they can contribute...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 24, 2002
1:26 am
169
... I'm sorry. I can't understand what "one representative" means outside the abstract definition. In a STV election, with a ranked ballot, ABC, my vote starts...
Tom Ruen
tomruen
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2002
3:22 am
170
You are confusing practical outcome with theoretical entitlement. ... The split you describe can only occur if your first preference is elected (in this case,...
rosenstiel@...
Send Email
Jan 24, 2002
10:28 am
Messages 141 - 170 of 1482   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help