thinking even more about it - when generating feed why not to generate
as much metadata in as many standards as possible? who knows what may
turn out to be useful ...

<atom:link rel="related" href="http://nytimes/2005/foo" title="Foo">
<atom:link rel="related" href="http://bbc/2005/bar" title="Bar">
<atom:link rel="via" href="http://other-blogger" title="other" />
<atom:link rel="related" href="http://myspace/SomeTopic"/>
<s:link rel="s:topic" xmlns:s="my-space" href="/SomeTopic"/>
<!-- now all kind of tagging -->
<dc:subject>SomeTopic</dc:subject>
<atom:category term="SomeTopic" />
<atom:category scheme="http://myspace/"
term="SomeTopic">
<a href="http://myspace/SomeTopic">SomeTopic</a>
</category>
<!-- i do not think rel="tag" is allowed in ATOM? ow it is going otbe
handled in ATOM 1.x? -->
<atom:link rel="related" href="http://technorati.com/tag/SomeTopic"/>

i wonder if there are more metadata schemas ...

thanks,

alek

--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay