Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
syndication · Discussion of XML news / announcement / syndication / resource discovery formats
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [syndication] Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #469 of 4640 |
[syndication] Re: Thoughts, questions, and issues.

>I think the answer from the RSS-DEV people (I'm sort of guessing, correct me
>if I'm wrong) is that the writers shouldn't have to understand the spec --
>they should be able to use tools that will generate the RSS for them.

Let me be a little more clear. I am a writer *and* I am a programmer.
Writing comes first; I program when I have a need, not because it's
k001 (though it is cool). I am a one-woman band at my website. I do
everything from writing to editing to markup to graphics to the books
to system administration to programming in perl, javascript and
Usertalk. I am a staff of one, and I am just one of dozens of
mid-sized websites that are run by one to three folks who have to
know how to do everything. I understand you're not saying this,
Aaron, I have nothing but respect for you, *believe* me, but this is
just a little too close to "don't worry your purty li'l head about
it, missy."

OK, fine, so I can find some tool somewhere to generate the RSS file
for me. But what if I want to parse one, which I will? I *still* have
to understand the spec, and I don't. And I'm neither stupid nor
technically illiterate, though obviously not at the level of this
august company.

It's not just the simple writers you'll need to worry about. It's the
simple webmasters who are doing things with RSS files now and who
will get tripped up by these changes. If you've ever done tech
support (and I have) you know that there are all kinds of people out
there doing this stuff--brilliant kids like Aaron and old duffers who
just wanna put up photos of the grandkids, and everyone in between.
I'm solidly in the middle; I know enough to get excited by this,
which is why I'm here. Those who are coming up to speed should have
a chance to get in on syndication and get excited too.

Anyway. Enough from me.

Lynn
--
Siprelle & Associates: Distinctive Web Design Since 1994
Lynn Siprelle, President: Newest Associate Josie born 9/9/97
Business: lynn@siprelle com | Personal: lynsa@...
Portfolio: http://www.siprelle.com/ | TNH: http://www.newhomemaker.com/



Mon Aug 21, 2000 3:39 am

lynn@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #469 of 4640 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... http://www.egroups.com/message/syndication/445 I think the answer from the RSS-DEV people (I'm sort of guessing, correct me if I'm wrong) is that the...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 20, 2000
11:04 pm

... Let me be a little more clear. I am a writer *and* I am a programmer. Writing comes first; I program when I have a need, not because it's k001 (though it...
Lynn Siprelle
lynn@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
3:44 am

... I'm so sorry -- I tried to stay away from that, but I guess I didn't do too good of a job. I have nothing but respect for you, Lynn. I love your site and...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
4:14 am

... These sorts of assumptions are self fulfilling to a degree. If you write a spec assuming that some users won't interact with it then they won't. This...
zac
zac@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
4:27 am

... It's true, and I maintain that the new spec is for more technical usage than the older one. For real heavy-duty use, it will require some understanding of...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
1:30 pm

... That answers my question. I guess my partner and I will be developing a simpler format for our project on our own. Thanks, Aaron! Lynn -- Siprelle &...
Lynn Siprelle
lynn@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:33 pm

... Well if you can try staying with an older version of the RSS format. It will give you access to more syndication system than if you create your own format....
zac
zac@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:35 pm

... We wanted to include a little more information than .91 allows. We might just go with SN format, or any of the other ones littering the landscape. :) Or we...
Lynn Siprelle
lynn@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:45 pm

That's fine. But I'm going to keep going. I'm tired of debating this stuff. I've been having a lot of fun in the last couple of months, and it's only been in...
Dave Winer
dave@...
Send Email
Aug 16, 2000
10:19 pm

... Heh, Hoisted by my own hyperbole! My apologies, Dave, 'apalled' was too strong a word. How about dismayed or disappointed? I understand getting fed up with...
Per Kreipke
per@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
3:38 pm

... The RSS1 proposal tries to serve multiple masters using a single XML syntactic representation. It is very close to being syntactically equivalent to RSS09...
Gabe Beged-Dov
begeddov@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
2:16 am

... Too many masters. ... Id does NOT LOOK like RSS that much. ... That seems to be the main problem: RDF focus. RSS became a popular format with people that...
Paulo Gaspar
Paulo.Gaspar@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
10:59 am

... That's not true. The authors were clearly _very_ concerned about backwards compatibility. There's a lot of junk in the spec that I'd like to see taken out,...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
1:49 pm

Howdy, ... There are just a few simple mechanical additions to add the RDF syntactic sugar needed for those in the RDF world to join the wonderful world of ...
Rael Dornfest
rael@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
8:17 pm

I'm cross-posting to rss-dev. It would be great if this thread continued there, but there may not be good intersection at the moment... ... The inchannel and...
Gabe Beged-Dov
begeddov@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
5:20 am

... This is true. If there are processors that are broken, I think it would be helpful for this group to know about it so we can provide fixes or perhaps...
Jonathan Eisenzopf
eisen@...
Send Email
Aug 17, 2000
9:32 pm

... Yes; in fact it should be online next week. Rael reports that you can give it RSS 1.0, and it will spit out 0.91. I'll add an option that give users the...
Jonathan Eisenzopf
eisen@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
1:04 am

... This is an interesting issue that I'd like to hear more opinions on. I think the goal is to make it simple for those crafting XML by hand and extensible...
Jonathan Eisenzopf
eisen@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:29 am

... I think simplicity just "is". If you need to appreciate something first then it isn't simple. This isn't meant as a criticism mind you, just an...
zac
zac@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:58 am

... Well, I would argue (as I believe I have done from the before the start of this thread) that the preceding formats have nothing to do with syndication,...
Ian Graham
ian.graham@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
5:45 pm

... Well this is the way I see it: writers write and when they have written something that they think others might be interested in, they click the publish...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
6:18 am

... That's why we need user friendly tools. RDF was not designed for humans, it was designed for computers to read and write. Nobody except the programmers...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
6:26 am

... Does that mean that you can't have a human readable format? Does robust and expandable imply that the format will not be human readable? -- We are born...
zac
zac@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
6:30 am

... It is human readable; that's not the point, so it machine language. RDF is a format that is designed so that the computers can do a better job of helping...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
6:47 am

... I don't think the authors will be making this choice. The tool makers will make this choice. Authors will choose the tools. If acceptable tools don't...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
1:46 pm

Hi Seth! ... I'm sorry, I meant authors in terms of authors of the spec, not authors of the content. (Lots of possible terminology confusion.) I totally agree...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
1:51 pm

... Cool! Well then, does anyone know where I can find a general purpose Win32 tool for a reading RDF into a knowledge base? -- Seth Russell ...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
1:59 pm

... Aaron, I disagree in part. We tried to strike the right balance between ease of use and extensibility. It's normal that people will have issues; some are...
Jonathan Eisenzopf
eisen@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
2:00 pm

... I assume you mean whining (wait, am I whining, now?). :-) ... I know that personally, to understand something I need to get my head around the mental...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
2:25 pm

... I don't think that's true. I believe the spec we released may look harder than it is, because we had to cover some technical details for programmers. I...
Jonathan Eisenzopf
eisen@...
Send Email
Aug 21, 2000
2:09 pm
 First  |  |  Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help