Yes, changing the name of the RSS 1.0 to something else is what makes
more sense - it is the for with the most diferences from the previous
version.

Have fun,
Paulo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@...]
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 21:19
> To: syndication@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [syndication] changing the name of RSS
>
>
> Tristan Louis wrote:
>
> > Second, if we do so, we then need to figure out whether we want to
> > still call it RSS (which could create some confusion in the
> > marketplace) or something else. The main reason behind this is to
> > clear up the air so that if that spec were to evolve, we can all
> > agree on it.
>
> I propose that we change the name because it would:
> (1) help heal the rift with Dave Winer,
> (2) encourage a new attitude towards this revolutionary RDF Metadata
> Feed; and
> (3) [as you indicate] clear up the confusion in the marketplace if the
> syndication group moves ahead with RSS 9+.
>
> Are there any valid arguments against changing the name?
>
> <signature>
> topic: Seth Russell
> is working on: MyMemory
> is soliciting help with: MyMemory
>
> topic: RMF
> anagram of: RDF Metadata Feed
> suggested rename of: RSS1
> </signature>
>
>
>
>