I'm embarking on some XML related projects, and went to review what was happening in this list to get geared up since we currently have over a quarter of a...
Steven Roussey
sroussey@...
Nov 7, 2000 2:35 am
879
... They didn't, but I believe this was implied by the fact that Netscape has stopped working on RSS and (nearly?) all of the the people who used to work on...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 7, 2000 3:15 am
880
I agree with Steven and I am aghast at what Aaron proposes. As far as I remember this goes against the wishes of RSS-DEV and Syndication -- the plan was to...
Jeff Barr
jeff@...
Nov 7, 2000 5:51 am
881
(I am sending this to RSS-DEV and to Syndication in hope of resolving the naming issue once and for all). My stance is that what is now known as RSS 1.0 needs...
Jeff Barr
jeff@...
Nov 7, 2000 6:25 am
882
... Sorry, I think I was misunderstood. I did not mean to suggest this as a possible plan for RSS-DEV or syndication -- merely a hypothetical possibility....
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 7, 2000 1:08 pm
883
... People already do the same thing about 1.0. I see no reason to make _their_ statements ambiguous. People keep acting like RSS 1.0 is nothing like RSS 0.9x...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 7, 2000 1:19 pm
884
... it, ... would ... Yes it would be wrong, since you are trying to use the name that does not belong to you for your own ends. This in not the high-seas, you...
Mark Ketzler
mketzler@...
Nov 7, 2000 1:21 pm
885
"The Other Thing" is the version of RSS with namespaces, hereafter known as RWN. ... it, ... would ... Abandoned? I've not heard about My Netscape being...
Jeff Barr
jeff@...
Nov 7, 2000 1:37 pm
886
I'm really suprised to be having this discussion over again. This message is rather long, and contains a number of excerpts from ancient RSS history that I was...
Dan Brickley
daniel.brickley@...
Nov 7, 2000 4:09 pm
887
... I thought XRSS (extensible RSS) was the name most people liked. Seth Russell...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Nov 7, 2000 4:10 pm
888
... Well maybe that should tell you there is still a real problem. Look, this thing is past the point of justifications being important. Im sure your...
Seth Russell
seth@...
Nov 7, 2000 4:51 pm
889
... Dan, Thanks for that; I've been wanting to know the background here for some time, and that makes it a lot clearer what's been going on. -- Mark Nottingham...
Mark Nottingham
mnot@...
Nov 7, 2000 5:06 pm
890
Basically, I have the same opinion as Seth. I never thought of it as RSS name belonging to entity A or entity B. It is just a matter of users interest. ...
Paulo Gaspar
Paulo.Gaspar@...
Nov 7, 2000 5:27 pm
891
I'm still confused. What version is Netscape going to use for their MyNetscape Network? Sincerely, Steven Roussey Network54.com http://network54.com/?pp=e...
Steven Roussey
sroussey@...
Nov 7, 2000 7:36 pm
892
I would second the concept of changing the name now and moving on. The main reason (and please, do not assume that I am taking any camp on this) is the ...
Tristan Louis
tristan@...
Nov 7, 2000 10:02 pm
893
... Sorry, I was unclear. By abandoned, I meant development of the spec, not actual usage. Apologies for the misunderstanding, -- [ Aaron Swartz |...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 7, 2000 10:12 pm
894
... What do you mean "going to"? AFAIK, Netscape is doing the same as they always have, using the two formats they developed (RSS 0.9 and RSS 0.91) as the...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 7, 2000 10:22 pm
895
... I agree. I have nothing to do with syndication format creation. We just use them. No one here wants to deal with Netscape coming out with a different RSS...
Steven Roussey
sroussey@...
Nov 9, 2000 3:48 am
896
... Correct me if you think I'm wrong, but this would affect *any* group intending to move forward with RSS, not specifically the RDF+NS branch, correct? This...
Ken MacLeod
ken@...
Nov 9, 2000 1:37 pm
897
... Only in the perspective of Netscape comming back at it. ... But there is the perspective of RDF+NS just being quite different from RSS 0.9x. ... DW is not...
Paulo Gaspar
Paulo.Gaspar@...
Nov 9, 2000 2:54 pm
898
To change the subject from the standards war that's clearly going to take longer to settle out than our current election: I run a web site where I publish a...
Antonio Romero
caromero1965@...
Nov 10, 2000 12:23 am
899
The things to do when you have a feed: - Register at http://my.userland.com - Submit to www.xmltree.com - Submit to Netscape ...
Jeff Barr
jeff@...
Nov 10, 2000 12:41 am
900
Antonio Romero ( caromero1965@... ) ... We found that explaining RSS stuff to our existing readership was the most useful. ...
Anita Rowland
anitar@...
Nov 10, 2000 5:27 pm
901
Hello all ! I plan to make a portal site about skinnable interfaces with, of course, changeable HTML "skins". It means different fonts, color, layout, pictures...
Jury Gerasimov
jury@...
Nov 14, 2000 10:35 am
902
... It seems to me the question is not the format of the portal, but the format of the underlying data. What format are your sources in? Or, are you not ...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 14, 2000 1:18 pm
903
... format ... an ... some ... I can't imagine how it's possible to go without XSLT. See, I have a portal page builded from 3 different components: - page...
Jury Gerasimov
jury@...
Nov 14, 2000 2:12 pm
904
Hello all - I'd like to announce the creation of a new website/weblog, RSS Info. http://www.blogspace.com/rss/ RSS Info is a source for news and information on...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 14, 2000 4:57 pm
905
... Ahh, I believe I'm beginning to understand you now. If you're under the control of the content sources (which I assume you are) you're probably best off by...
Aaron Swartz
aswartz@...
Nov 14, 2000 8:15 pm
906
... to ... the ... the ... save ... best ... Perharps I will fihish with that, but now I'm still trying to follow to the mainstream. It would allow me to use...
Jury Gerasimov
jury@...
Nov 15, 2000 3:53 am
907
... I'm a member of the RSS 1.0 Working Group, so I was trying not to seem too biased. ;-) IMHO, the best choice is RSS 1.0. It should do everything you want,...
