--- In synergeo@yahoogroups.com, "frank" <fzubek@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In synergeo@yahoogroups.com, "coyote_starship" <kirby.urner@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I dissect differently, I do self similarity, ALWAYS where the chunk
resembles the whole we dissecting, thus these new modules are either same in
surface to vol. ratios or are the best compared to any other infinite way of
dissecting a whole.
> > >
> >
> > This doesn't make much sense unless you're saying you can't build
> > the rhombic dodecahedron or you have a rhombic dodecahedron as one
> > of your units, take your pick.
>
> fz, of course I do, one is a BCC, THE OTHER IS CCP, we both have Mite, well
one of the building blocks, few other combos exist.
>

You were saying there's "ALWAYS a chunk resembling the whole we
dissecting." I was wondering how that played out in the case of
the rhombic dodecahedron.

I don't think we both have the Mite. I have the Mite, on the
Synergetics side of the fence, but you do not manage to get
through the gate, and so have no Mite.

You may have your own word for it, but when you try to talk
Synergetics you become somewhat incoherent, like Rybo. You are
far from fluent in this not-English language. So I think you
should not try so hard.

Be a defender for XYZers, for Harvard. Don't try so hard to
use words for which you don't really get the meaning.

You have not understood "frequency" or "A" or "B" module. You
get them all scrambled.

I'm glad Koski is your therapist on this. "Arnie" and "Bennie"
will help you I think. They are warm and fuzzy and you were
often spanked as a child I suspect because you would puke on
Mickey Mouse on purpose, after begging to go to DisneyLand.

The "time out" punishments you were given must have predisposed
you to this Life of Bondo you pursue. The cigarettes. The
Youtubes. It all fits.

David will help you. He will be stern.

Maybe someday you will join us on the other side of the fence,
really knowing your stuff. Rybo has tried many times but he
gets bogged down in "heightwidthdepth" as a three something.
There's this superstition about the number 3, X Y Z, the Trinity.
Trinitarians say God gave use three dimensions of space. The
neo-Trinitarians say "three of space, one of time". They do not
allow themselves the nuances and fine tuning of the humanities
disciplines because they believe "math should be blunt". Then
they leave everything imprecise and hand wavy, walking away,
trusting "infinity" to do their dirty work.

"Infinity", like "chaos" is sort of like "special forces".
Analog mathematicians like to truck out these "superpowers" when
faced with some of the more intractable cases, kids who won't buy
the standard fare. It's assumed such juveniles will be indoctrinated
by more forceful means. What's been happening though, is a lot
of them have formed alliances outside the schools, with heavy
industry and software engineering. Now we're pushing back with
digital math and the "blunt instruments of state" that had been
working for the church-goers, are starting to just bend and
fracture. They've encountered a "hardened silo" as they say,
a spanking new Digital Math that doesn't need to bend over and
kowtow. We've got all the hardware and software we need, and
eager students. We've got our railroad.

>
> > In Synergetics, 2As + B give use the core ratio for IVM space,
> > same ratio as tet:oct (2:1),
>
> fz, yeah same here, and also accomplished with irregulars,
>

You do not have A and B modules, for the same reason you have no
Mites.

You should get written permission to use these words, from the BFI.
I know that's not a legal requirement but we need some kind of
standard to keep Harvard or other schools from dumbing down our
American Transcendentalism and making it something more Zubekian.

When I say "American Transcendentalism" I'm hoping to be kind to
certain brands of literati who have a more geographic than
nationalistic grasp of what being an American means. Somewhat
ironically, it's those with the more geographic understanding who
come across as being more authentically American at the end of the
day. The nationalists are hollow posers by comparison. They
often stick out as the most flag wavy, yet they know nothing of
geology, of the history, of the many peoples in the land.

> and the rhombic dodecahedron is
> > constructable and has easy-peasy volume of 6. Is that what you
> > do too. What's your rhombic dodecahedron volume, if not six?
> >
>
> fz, yes 6 TWO FREQ.TET.
>

What does this mean TWO FREQ. TET. You should not be trying to
sound like you know any Synergetics. This takes away from your
credibility, which is the wrong direction for you. I'm glad
Koski is your shrink and that he's making it really easy for you.
I think that's productive. I'm glad you came back and are getting
some help, even though Rybo doesn't believe you're really here,
thinks he chased you away.

> > I think your problem is you don't stick to your side of the fence.
> > You want to reach over the razor wire and try to "fix" Synergetics
> > which you clearly don't understand, in terms of what you call
> > "A" an "B" modules or "LCD" or "frequency" or some other term
> > you only half understand. You should stick to the things you
> > know about.
>
> FZ, Look who is talking, without Kosky you would be like Rybo,
>

No seriously, you have the Youtubes to prove it: over and over
and over the same mistakes, the same not getting it. If I want
to show a class an exhibit of someone who doesn't get it, your
Youtubes might be assigned. Thank you for doing them. We can all
learn from your mistakes.

> > I think if you just focus on your own dissections and don't try
> > to back seat drive, life will be easier for you. You will seem
> > like less of a fool and make more sense to others. It's when you
> > attack Synergetics that you stop making sense, because you come
> > from a position of ignorance, and that makes you sound weak, even
> > to onlookers who have no clue what's under discussion.
>
> fz, Honestly the onlookers perhaps do not know what's up but I guarantee you
that You, CJ, or Kosky, have no clue, funny just few letters earlier Kosky was
happy that you guys can do all the 7 basic cryst. lattices isn't this a good
news NONE OF YOU HAD A CLUE, ah sure there are few onlookers go"WHAT"???
>

You still have a long way to go as an inpatient here. I'm sorry
about Prohibition and all the unenlightened ideas about medical
practice here. We're bringing more Asian medicines into Occupy
Portland, to help make up for hitting a glass ceiling in a western
medicine sense. We can't do operations. We can do psychological
counseling and some medics and paramedics have been offering their
services. However, with the Chinese peacekeeper concept (like
peacecorps), or the Russian MirCorps (like a geek corps), we're able
to advertise some alternatives to high cost "all American" health
care (the kind that leaves people out in the cold to die).

Kirby

> frank
>
> > Kirby
> >
>