Sorry if you receive multiple copies of this message Call to register for Infocom 99. Infocom 99 will be held in NY from March 21-25, 99. Please register ASAP...
Irene Katzela
irene@...
Mar 1, 1999 7:15 pm
584
Folks- There is a slight modification in the "tcpsat" mailing list. The US Congress has renamed NASA's Lewis Research Center in honor of John Glenn. The...
Mark Allman
mallman@...
Mar 1, 1999 8:18 pm
585
To whom it may concern, I read with much interest the RFC related to enhancing TCP performance over satellite channels. The RFC suggests the use of standard...
Mohssine Lahlou
Mohssine.Lahlou@...
Mar 19, 1999 12:18 am
586
See: [PSC] Jamshid Mahdavi. Enabling High Performance Data Transfers on Hosts. http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html. for information which stacks and...
adfalk@...
Mar 19, 1999 1:55 am
587
[My apologies if you receive this more than once] ====================================================== ...
Raouf Boutaba
rboutaba@...
Mar 22, 1999 10:28 pm
588
To whom it may concern, this is a call for interest to join the team which is preparing a proposal for the Ten-Telecom program of the European Commission. The...
Franco Carducci
f.carducci@...
Mar 25, 1999 12:37 pm
589
To whom it may concern, this is a call for interest to join the team which is preparing a proposal for the Ten-Telecom program of the European Commission. The...
Franco Carducci
f.carducci@...
Mar 25, 1999 6:26 pm
590
Folks- I just submitted a new version of the res-issues ID to the archive. It should show up within the next few days. Until then you can grab a copy from: ...
Mark Allman
mallman@...
Mar 25, 1999 8:58 pm
591
Oops! I got the URL of the new version of res-issues wrong in my email. The correct URL is: ...
Mark Allman
mallman@...
Mar 25, 1999 9:34 pm
592
This link is broken. ... From: Mark Allman [mailto:mallman@...] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 2:07 PM To: tcpsat@... Subject: tcpsat:...
Mittal Monani
MMonani@...
Mar 25, 1999 11:17 pm
593
New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the TCP Over Satellite Working Group of the IETF. ...
Internet-Drafts@...
Mar 27, 1999 12:03 am
594
Please be aware, colleagues...This was Published Today in THE WASHINGTON POST This is cleanable.... ...
BeedNet1@...
Mar 28, 1999 1:46 pm
595
Hi, Can anyone point me to some research or tables showing how BER affects TCP/IP thoughput? At the same time, does anyone have any real world experience of...
Jon Mansey
jon@...
Mar 31, 1999 1:07 am
596
... One could say the same thing about TCP being BER friendly. Most RFC 2001-compliant implementations assume that congestion has occurred if a packet is lost,...
Fred Baker
fred@...
Mar 31, 1999 1:57 am
597
... 1E-8 or better. It really depends on the length of transfer. As soon as you get an error, your window is going to half it size due to congestion control....
William D Ivancic
William.D.Ivancic@...
Mar 31, 1999 3:10 pm
598
... Or you enable SACK (or any of its newer brethren), which is highly recommended. For some data points, have a look at my ARTES3 presentation on: ...
Gertjan van Oosten
gertjan@...
Mar 31, 1999 4:03 pm
599
Two quick comments.... ... Just to re-iterate the rest of Will's email... It all depends on the traffic. I do not think there is one single right answer like...
Mark Allman
mallman@...
Mar 31, 1999 4:08 pm
600
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, William D Ivancic wrote: <snip> ... Huh?!? OK - I really have to ask... what *specifically* does not "correspond to that of a commercial...
Eric Travis
travis@...
Mar 31, 1999 4:49 pm
601
We plotted some curves on this for different link rates. Actually TCP with SACK and so on does reasonably good (provided you provision large enough router...
Vijay G Bharadwaj
vgb@...
Mar 31, 1999 6:00 pm
602
... From: Mittal Monani Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 11:51 AM To: 'mallman@...' Subject: RE: BER and TCP/IP performance Out of curiosity : how(if)...
Mittal Monani
MMonani@...
Mar 31, 1999 6:22 pm
603
Jon, For Web traffic, a practical goal would be that almost all (say 99%) of Web pages load without any bit errors. Considering the RTT, a single error in any...
Brooker, Ralph
Ralph.Brooker@...
Mar 31, 1999 7:03 pm
604
... yes, sorry......
Fred Baker
fred@...
Mar 31, 1999 7:13 pm
605
The currently accepted best formula for TCP performance as a function of packet loss is given in the following paper: Padhye, J., Firoiu, V., Towsley, D., and...
Jamshid Mahdavi
mahdavi@...
Mar 31, 1999 7:15 pm
606
Jon, There's been a fair amount of traffic here already, but let me chime in to provide some theory, some opinion, and some data. Theory: Matt Mathis, and...
Robert C. Durst
durst@...
Mar 31, 1999 7:32 pm
607
Jamshid- Thank you for raising an important point. Not all bit errors are equivalent. Most (all?) satellite links utilize FEC. Block coding results in lost...
adfalk@...
Mar 31, 1999 8:17 pm
608
Aaron, ... It had really ought to be darn better than that, since you're going to be cutting your rate in half for every loss and building rate back at about 1...
Robert C. Durst
durst@...
Mar 31, 1999 9:14 pm
609
... Sorry, I left out the word necessarily between "not" and "correspond". The point I was trying to make was that you have to understand the environment ...
William D Ivancic
William.D.Ivancic@...
Mar 31, 1999 11:33 pm
610
... Only if the definition of 'decent' translates to an effective cwnd of ~1 or 2 segments :o( You really want your (non-congestion based) losses bunched...
Eric Travis
travis@...
Mar 31, 1999 11:34 pm
611
... Do you have data to support this? I have lots of measurements over a channel simulator that say I can get >90% link utilization on a T1 using ...
Vijay G Bharadwaj
vgb@...
Apr 1, 1999 12:03 am
612
Jon, Here is some more TCP throughput data that you might find useful. Some of the numbers do not match those sent by Fred or Bob Durst, but I have verified...