Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
telescopes · Talking Telescopes
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 136014 - 136043 of 136649   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
136014
I have a Vixen SXD mount on which I currently use a Baby Q with a SBIG ST-10XME CCD camera and a CFW-10 filter wheel. The mount's rated load is around 50...
mpalmer552003
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2009
2:40 am
136015
A simple answer is if you intend to do astroimaging, get the LX200. If you just want to do visual eyepiece viewing, the LX90 is a better value. The LX200...
Matthew Ota
matthewota
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
3:25 am
136016
I just posted 4 pics of the half moon taken 5/31/09. The pics are in this Talking Telescopes group photo gallery in my album named "Bob's Astro Pics". I used a...
Bob
bob_spez2003
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
5:41 am
136017
I currently have a 10 inch f4.9 mirror in my dob. My interests are strictly visual. Is there a general consensus of what constitutes a planetary miorror? F6 to...
langejcarl
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
1:37 pm
136018
Hi,   A planetary mirror used to be considered f9 or higher with a perfect figure and small secondary. They were more popular years back when mounts were more...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
2:22 pm
136019
... This is what used to be thought. Nowadays you can purchase high quality short focal ratio mirrors which function every bit as well as those with long...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
3:03 pm
136020
Hi,  I'm not sure I agree, even though it's possible to achieve better figures on short ratio reflectors the larger size of the secondary will effect the...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
4:44 pm
136021
Hi, The secondary on my 18" f4.5 is about 19% by diameter. I think that is small enough, i.e. less than 20%, that the obstruction is not much of a factor. At...
Chip Gentry
cgentryz
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
8:08 pm
136022
... The secondary on my Starmaster is well under 20% of the primary diameter. I've never compared it to a 10" f/8 Cave, but it is vastly superior to my 8" f/7...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2009
9:29 pm
136023
I used to think like that, as did the whole amateur astronomy community. Things have changed a lot in the last 20 years. Once the central obstruction gets...
John Bambury
ausastronomer
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
11:13 am
136024
. Nowadays you can purchase high quality ... Ok, so assuming that you had two equally figured mirrors, both made by Zambuto for example, and the only...
langejcarl
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
11:45 am
136025
Chip,   I'm sure your 18" does very well with good seeing conditions, but for someone with a smaller scope (10" or less) 19% obstruction will give the user...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
12:39 pm
136026
... Rick that is totally incorrect. I have a 10"/F5 scope that will absolutely eat any 4" APO on the planet, given seeing conditions adequate to suport 10" of...
John Bambury
ausastronomer
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
12:43 pm
136027
Geoff,  I have not tried a Zambuto mirror but have heard nothing but praise about them. I no longer own my 12.5" f7 Cave which under good seeing gave me the...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
12:53 pm
136028
John,   Our equipment and experience is different. My 6" f15 refractor gave me better planetary views than any of our astronomy clubs reflectors (8"-12.5")...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
1:23 pm
136029
... That myth was put to rest many years ago with careful experimentation by Terry Dickinson and Peter Ceravolo, reported in detail in Sky & Telescope, back...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
1:26 pm
136030
... A few years ago I did a side-by-side comparison on a well collimated Celestron 8" SCT and my 8" f/7 Cave Newtonian, and there was virtually no difference...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
1:33 pm
136031
Geoff,   It's not a myth but opinions about the loss of image quality has certainly been studied and updated in recent years. The loss of light gathering...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
1:49 pm
136032
Geoff,   I agree. I only wish that my vision was as good as it used to be, and skies were as dark. regards, Rick ... From: Geoff Gaherty <geoff@...> ...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
1:52 pm
136033
I would have to agree with Rick. From my experience, given equal quality, the longer focal length reflectors put up a better planetary image. The difference is...
PJ Anway
pjanway
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2009
11:13 pm
136034
Hi, After all these posts about Newtonians I would like to find a GOTO, computer controlled GEM (that will accept an autoguider) so I can use my 8" f7 for...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
12:29 pm
136035
... I used my Cave 8" f/7 on a Losmandy G11 for several years and found it to be excellent. My Cave has a fiberglass tube and rotating rings, so is quite...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
1:04 pm
136036
Geoff,   Thanks for your quick reply. I was wondering about the Orion Atlas, I believe it would be less money than a G11. I'll contact Orion's tech support...
jack11973@...
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
1:17 pm
136037
... The electronics of the Sirius and the Atlas are identical, I believe. I found the Sirius works quite well. The computer is not as sophisticated as those...
Geoff Gaherty
gahertyg
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
1:36 pm
136038
Geoff,   I don't need the GOTO but do need the ability to autoguide which is usually all the same electronics. The accuracy of tracking is the most important...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
4:56 pm
136039
Hi Rick, What budget are you looking at and what is the total weight of the telescope/camera combination you are going to use? Clear skies, Kevin Dixon ...
Kevin Dixon
starmaster08083
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2009
8:24 pm
136040
Hi Kevin,   Right now my budget is very limited, it's going to have to be under $2k. I'm guessing my OTA with camera & autoguider will be in the 30-40lb...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2009
12:46 am
136041
Hi Rick, Unfortunately, you are in a tough situation from a few perspectives. Your budget, for the payload and dimensions of the equipment you wish to use,...
Kevin Dixon
starmaster08083
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2009
5:34 pm
136042
Kevin,   I still have options. My primary scope is a 12" Meade LX200 on a wedge and pier that I piggyback various scopes and telephoto lenses on. I might just...
Rick Jack
jack11973
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2009
8:54 pm
136043
Hi Rick, Even upgrading to an RC still leaves the mount issue. The RC's are beasts in terms of size and weight. I have had the wonderful opportunity to use a...
Kevin Dixon
starmaster08083
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2009
9:09 pm
Messages 136014 - 136043 of 136649   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help