Am I here? Okay.
I am now resuming some ideas concerning Teslas Coil for
Electromagnets, and submit a theoretical design to the tesla list for
comment, as I would rather see why something will not work before
expending funds again... All of my former assets, 50 miles of 23
gauge wire, 15,000 ft of insulated 14 gauge wire spools whose primary
use was conjuction for source frequency (continuous wave) resonant
voltage rise at alternator frequency near 480 hz; one thousand
dollars worth of square aluminum tubing, a dozen Radio Shack Mega
Cable Speaker wire spirals ect on down the line; all of these things
were taken during robbery of my homestead while incarcerated for a 6
month period, whereby I was granted early release for identification
of stolen items.
Teslas Coil for Electromagnets deals with creating a higher
internal capacity via winding method, but the subject is introduced
from only the first consideration of a returned layer wind, which is
actually the lowest form of energy storage if the coils are
considered from the multi layer standpoint and utilysing square
shaped conductors. The next method is using zig zag lateral
layering; whereby viewed from the axis of wind each layering will be
in opposing winding direction but also opposite current directions
thus they are in magnetic unity, and generally one third more
internal capacity is made by this conventional winding method, simply
for the fact that the energy storage value based on the relative
voltage difference between winding surface areas is a exponential
function, and therefore the winding design that can interface the
highest voltage differential between windings initially becomes the
concern, but this also depends on choice of arc gap and any
additional capacity to be added. Richard Hull's Clorado Springs
commentary for July 8th shows a primary arc gap schematic he dubbs
the Tesla Equidrive Tank Circuit. This shows the arc gap present
before the addition of two equal capacities on either side of the
break and then connection to the primary coil as its middle
component. What I would intially propose is to use square aluminum
tubing of 1 ft* .5 in *5 in as the primary windings, and the Mega
Cable Speaker wire as the insulation between windings. The
connections between the corners of the winds can be negotiated by
sanding down dowel rods to fit down the interior of the square
aluminum tube leaving 4 open internal corners on the endings, of
which four strands of grounding wire can be inserted for a tight
surface area connection between segments of the windings. The Mega
Cable Speaker Wire here is ideal for the purposes at hand, having two
flattened braided wires inside the PVC insulation and the external
width of both the square tube primary and its intervening coil
winding are good for construction. The aim of the Lorentz
transformer is to procure simultaneous electric and magnetic field
interaction at right angles across, or more properly through the
width of the intervening secondary coil wiring inside the insulation
of the primary winds which is composed again of square aluminum
tubing. To do this the first premise is presented. If we visualize
the magnetic circles around the conductors arranged to produce an
external magnetic field, we find that internally between the windings
of a multilayered coil, all the magnetic circles are in opposition
with their neighbors, but externally the magnetic circles are in
agreement. If we reverse this scenario, internally between windings,
(the location of the secondary coil) the magnetic circles will be in
agreement. In such an arrangement as a high frequency transformer,
the Megacable Speaker wire in analogy could fuction as the secondary
exciting a tetertiary third helically wound magnifier coil with
smaller gauge wire. The first consideration here becomes the
reduction of primary inductance by virtue of this "scalar" design,
and the Pandora's box of paradoxical consequences that is opened up
once conjecture begins to take place. Another item to be replaced
from the ransacking of my assets is the spool of paper coated steel
wire,(used on bread bags) that I had wound several hundred turns
around a four segment aluminum square tube wind to look for changes
of inductance by LCR meter, but understandably no changes were seen,
this more then likely due to the instruments sensing signal, but this
opens up the first question as to the use of the design employing no
high frequency effects, but ordinary source frequency transformer
design at 60 hz.
Question 1: One the one hand considering both the angles of the
interwinding electric & magnetic fields being created by a design
that minimizes the possible external magnetic field but enhances it
internally, For a multiturn primary could we not use iron spiralled
loops around the windings so that the shape of the ferromagnetic core
itself is used for the secondary winding? This obviously is not a
good idea due to the resistance of steel wire, but it opens up other
imaginations for design such as again intervening MegaCable speaker
windings wrapped around the the inner and outer lengths of square
tube steel pieces made as steel sleeves fitting around the
circumference of the square aluminum windings, one of the few things
left from the robbery..., But here the paradox opens because
contradictory principles are at play. The first objection to the use
of iron to increase induction in primary loops is addressed by the
LCR readings themselves and perhaps the non linear factors involved
with ferromagnetism. Would the idea of a "honeycomb" like iron
structure, in which the iron surrounds the windings themselves
instead of the windings surrounding a toroidal silicone iron loop be
applicable in transformer theory, possibly to reduce the amount of
iron itself used per amount of power transfered? There seems to be
an explanation for many things easily overlooked without considering
that ferromagnetism has a saturation curve that also has a bottom
end, and perhaps for example if I built a nine turn primary with
windings surrounding by steel sleeves, I might never see the effects
of ferromagnetism due to the fact that the amount of amp turns needed
to engage the "ELECTROMAGNETISM" of the volume of ferromagnetic
material being stimulated by said method of a certain amount of amp
turns necessary to cause said magnetisation; BY DOGIES, if this
investigation might show that if a honeycomb iron core with windings
creating internal magnetic harmony might possibly USE an amount of
amp turns FAR below the normal external method; then in fact if that
were true, we must admit that Tesla's Coil For Electromagnets might
be the most cryptic patent of all time; almost like leading one into
a maze whereby only one possible solution is presented upon exiting
the maze: the hidden meaning behind the statement that increasing
internal capacity in a coil is an effective way to stimulate
electromagnetism, but Ha HA Ha I laugh because I doubt if even he
himself realized the ramifications there, but if he did he must have
been the most secretive person of all time; simply because once we
have glimpsed a magnificent thing we could barely be able to hold
such a thing to ourselves; and we would be out and about to preach it
to the rest of the thinking world!! There are also, in my opinion
clues here to the wireless transmission of energy through the ground,
where the concept of a high frequency resonant antennae design comes
into play, whereby there becomes no need for the receptor antennae to
employ a discreet external capacity to vibrate: instead that needed
capacity is itself interfaced with the earth ground on both sending
and recieving stations. A modification of the magnifier principle is
imagined whereby the actual line coupled connection is eliminated and
the tetertiary is itself grounded capacitively identically to the
amount on the sending station, and placed in distance from the
approximation of what becomes the quarter wavelength linear distance
between sending and recieving stations accomplished at the sending
station by the splitting of that primary coil itself in two; by
allowing the primary arc gap to be placed not before the arrangement
as mentioned in the Hull schematic, but after the LC components
electrical travel path: in other words the literal midpoint of the
entire length of the circuit occuring in the middle of the primary
coils winding length. In this alteration of arc gap position the
distinction between "acting" internal capacity and "midpoint open
circuit" capacity becomes apparent. Consider a nine wind square
primary winding laid in three lateral layerings. For all cases 12
internal segments between winds exist as actual internal capacity.
Then we consider the charge alignment on the surface areas of the
square conductors when open circuit is made at the midpoint. For an
even number of conductors arranged in a square array. such as 16, the
division of the coil into two allows four surface areas on each four
center winds to function as plate areas for deposition midpoint open
circuit charge, so this is the "actual" capacity present at arc gap
cessation for use in calculations involving Thompsons resonance
formula, only now that capacity exists inside the coil (which becomes
an additional complication) and for purposes of comparison we imagine
different winding schemes, whereby the ratio of total
internal capacity surface areas vs the open midpoint circuit
capacities is compared. At first I had contemplated that magic
squares used as the wind succession numbering method might be a code
as to ascertaining the highest internal capacity present as a winding
method, but during my long stay of incarceration I soon saw the
fallacy of my theory, so to speak: which is actually a good thing as
enormous complications are then removed by simply directly going to a
diagonally layered inverted cone design constructed primary coil of
three layers, but unfortunately unequal numbers of winds; but however
the necessity of this as a first model becomes understood as a first
easily built and tested hypothesis. The aim here is to make a coil
with the highest midpoint open circuit capacity, (MOCC) by winding
method, and the first puzzle is shown. Suppose we are given 64 one ft
lengths of of these 1/2 in wide aluminum segments, and told to form
a plate capacity with them which then consists of 32 to a side,
making one ft by 16 inches plate capacity. Now the requirement is
made to use only 36 pieces instead of 64, and still construct the
same amount of capacity, which is done instead by using more than one
side of the conductor for the MOCC, and diagonal layering methods. In
the first case of 9 square, the center open circuit as a split wind
no 5, have half of their total four surface areas are active as MOCC
surface areas, but the edge windings only use one conductor side for
MOCC, yeilding 4 internal capacity surface areas out of 12 for
possible use. Using the diagonal layering in the first odd magic
square of 9 uses 8 of the 12 as MOCC for surface areas. Using a
square winding structure we can use four arrays of 3*3 windings
connected in series with 32 internal MOC capacities with each wind
going through four of the arrays of nine concentric windings, for a
total of 2/3 usage of possible internal capacity. We next consider
the scheme using closer total usage of surface areas using first the
analogy of 10 winds, four arranged as a central diagonal, and six
arranged around it in fashion so that the beginning and ending winds
of the central arc gap can conect to either end of its surrounding
inner and outer conical diagonal windings alternating on either side
for highest relative voltage across adjacent surface areas between
the conductors. This arrangement still does not do full justice to
the idea, which is to employ all four surface areas for the MOCC
function, which in this case for 16 winds only 3/4 of the winding
surface areas is exploited. But a game plan for initial construction
it seems sensible as a first enquiree, and not waste time with
insensible designs. Here many blind alleys might exist, such as the
following; In particular we might wonder about the possibility of
minimizing hetzian EM by having the possibility of its own primary
windings, which will always occur with an odd number of windings
placed into a square array where the center point will be the center
winding; In contrast an even numbered amount of windings has its MOCC
point placed on an external winding, if this is correct. Surrouding
the arc gap with primary windings might sheild the hertzian EM?
In any case a distortion of Thompsons resonance formula, should
be readily evident in the building of tesla coil primaries using
adjacent insulated square windings since internal capacity must be
measured in the equation in light of the fact that midpoint open
circuit capacities can be measured and logically explained by winding
succession method and midpoint open coil circuit break. Now we
venture into thoughts concerning capacity in a primary tank circuit
and how it lowers the natural vibration. Surely the first thing to be
investigated here is to set up a high frequency vibration whereby
equal external and internal capacities are used, which in this case
is easily procurable by using the aluminum segments themselves
arranged into different geometries. If in fact we added an equal flat
plane capacitor of 64 aluminum segments to the same 36 pieces used
used to procur the same capacity, from the midpoint open circuit
break; and measured the total capacity present from the capacity
placed at midpoint in addition to the capacity present in the coil,
the meter reads those two capacities placed in parallel, as would be
suspected; but if that external capacity value were used internally
it lowers the coils natural vibration by half as would be expected,
but not by formula when using the external capacity alone. If the
same amount of capacity could be attached instead in series OUTSIDE
the coil appearing itself in series with the midpoint open circuit
capacity, as is shown by Hulls schematic then the role of added
capacity to lower the vibration would seem more efficient as then
twice the total capacity is charged externally to half the input
voltage if the coils as a midpoint load is not considered, which is
obviously untrue, as then it has its own capacity to be discharged
as the pathway to arc gap.


I am aware that a vertical TC secondary is base grounded, and that it
is a forced node of the high frequency created by the primary arc gap
L and C values. Is it very common to ground one side of a primary arc
gap? If so is not an arc to ground creating an electrical wave in the
earth? I have previously considered a design for wireless energy
transmission predominantly through the ground that uses some unusual
features and have most of this written in wordpad so that I can
submit it later. However this becomes the first question; can the
sending station arc to ground via the primary arc gap?
From this point I would prefer to use a very high frequency and
locate the secondary NOT over the sending primary, but at the distant
location one quarter wavelength away. Several different things might
be tried as what might be called resonant antennae design will be
tried. This will be somewhat of a costly project as sectioned square
aluminum tubing will be used for the primary(s) and the primaries
capacities used for resonance will consist of the placement of
dielectrically enclosed flat braided copper windings serving as an
Oudin like primary connection for the secondary. Essentially two
inverted conical constructions current wise using five segments to a
wind. (Notes to wireless group from other records in notepad) HDN /
Apology for segmentary records...