I am very impressed with the power transfer with dual secondaries, and the
associated increase of relative amp turn actions between primary and secondary.
A dramatic increase of voltage in vs voltage out is shown on the outer layers of
phases 1 & 3 in the 266 pancake coil assembly, each facing their respective
secondaries. It is immediately seen that when only the top secondary is in place
drawing  amperage, the amperages of the three primaries are not reduced
significantly, but when the additional bottom secondary is brought into play,
this yeilds a significant overall primary amperage reduction, for the same
amount of amperage formally found on the top coil, is now split between the
coils in an unequal ratio according to their differing amounts of magnetic field
issuing from the 266 primary poles, now somewhat tightly coupled with larger
turn secondaries providing a voltage rise to the ending loads. However once the
secondaries are loaded down by loads, extracting a portion of amperage that
would normally circulate in the LC loops, then the dramatic efficiencies are
reduced to common examples of power transfer. In fact the incandescent bulbs are
probably only 50% efficient.
HDN

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> The top secondary empowers three incandescent bulbs in series@ 490 volts
enabling 40 ma across load, from a 70 ma circulation.
> Its adjacent phase 3 pancake coil uses 4A @~10V.
> The bottom two phases 1 & 2 have ~1.5 A consumptions@ 10 volt range and above.
The bottom secondary empowers a magnet assisted neon discharge whereby a wildly
fluxuating 5 ma is taken from a 40 ma bottom secondary amperage circulation or
40*7=280 volts,(the neon will not normally fire at this lower voltage and the
use of the magnet is an innovation) You tube of 3 min. loading now.
> HDN
http://youtu.be/treqxFsTrbU

The neon pathway aided by magnet barely disturbs the bottom amperage circulation
of ~ 40 ma.
Dual Secondary Loadings from 266 Primary

http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/5686919751/
3.6 ma from a wildly fluxuating meter reading is withdrawn from a ~40 ma bottom
coil LC loop circulation; ~ 280 volts across neon is aided in discharge by
ceramic magnet. 14.2 volts enabling 1.8 A is on the bottom ph 1 primary adjacent
to the bottom coil.

Input Voltages & Phase Amperages from 3 ph. Alternator
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/5686919747/
Stator (Delta) Lines to phases (1-3) and (3-2) at ~ 6.8A shows excess of current
to the lines it serves hence the vector subtraction between noted phase
junctions makes no sense. Ordinarily the stator delivery line amperage is noted
as the vector difference of the associated phase currents it serves. Here ph 3
on the top layer pancake primary underneath the top secondary has 10.3 volts
enabling 4.3A; while the top secondary has ~490 volts enabling a   series three
bulb 40 ma bulb discharge  diverted from a 70 ma LC loop circulation

He has been getting pissed off lately, saying I take all the credit for
discoveries without giving him any credit. Whatever then; might as well give him
his 59 seconds or so. I told him he could be a star in his own right, but he
needs more training. Will return momentarily with his video.
HDN

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> He has been getting pissed off lately, saying I take all the credit for
discoveries without giving him any credit. Whatever then; might as well give him
his 59 seconds or so. I told him he could be a star in his own right, but he
needs more training. Will return momentarily with his video.
> HDN
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4SbwsBsngI

Hello all,

Here is CLEAR evidence that "torsion" is in effect:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/04may_epic/

"... May 4, 2011: Einstein was right again. There is a space-time vortex
around Earth, and its shape precisely matches the predictions of Einstein's
theory of gravity. ..."

The article is a bit misleading. Nothing like a GOOD experiment to blow away
years of mainstream science nonsense!

A slightly clearer understanding is given here:
http://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime4.html

The whole key to understanding Gravity is SPIN!

"... and torsion, a mathematical term related to the intrinsic twist of
spacetime (this appears in some extensions of general relativity, but
Einstein himself set it to zero in general relativity for reasons of logical
economy). Are there connections between these manifestations of spin in the
worlds of the large and small? Do they hint at the direction in which
Einstein's theory of gravity might need to be extended in order to unify it
with the other forces of nature? ..."

The article goes on:
"... Nobel laureate C.N. Yang wrote in a letter to NASA Administrator James
M. Beggs in 1983 that general relativity, "though profoundly beautiful, is
likely to be amended ... whatever [the] new geometrical symmetry will be, it
is likely to entangle with spin and rotation, which are related to a deep
geometrical concept called torsion ... The proposed Stanford experiment
[Gravity Probe B] is especially interesting since it focuses on the spin. I
would not be surprised at all if it gives a result in disagreement with
Einstein's theory." ..."

The concept of warped or curved space-time is misleading. What is curved is
the electromagnetic medium or aether in space due to the spin of fundamental
"charged" particles. Since this medium is essentially wraping itself around
"charged" particles, it creates a tension or torsion between particles. We
call this tension "gravity."

A key concept of gravity control or anti-gravity control is controlling this
tension through spin/counter-spin techniques both mechanically and
electrically.

Bill

---
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ  85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
   URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

Will make video soon. Each of the secondaries in the previous demo had neon and
incandescent bulb loads. Now these loads are replaced with arc gaps containing
separate TC primaries in series. The bottom coil fails to fire its arc gap, yet
the responce from its secondary seems stronger. A definite division of stator
voltages is present on the three phases empowering the 266 primary layering.
Some interesting things to be shown. HDN

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> Will make video soon. Each of the secondaries in the previous demo had neon
and incandescent bulb loads. Now these loads are replaced with arc gaps
containing separate TC primaries in series. The bottom coil fails to fire its
arc gap,(in the taping made I was able to get the weaker bottom side secondary
to fire its smaller arc gap. But even if the arc gap does not fire the TC
secondary connected to the bottom 266 secondary has a stronger responce)yet the
responce from its secondary seems stronger. A definite division of stator
voltages is present on the three phases empowering the 266 primary layering.
Some interesting things to be shown. HDN
>
The division of stator voltages is rather profound. Ph 1 recieves below what it
should have where the open circuit voltage of the alternator should be in the 20
volt range. Phases 2 & 3 go upwards in voltage past that 20 volt input, where
phase 3 is seen outputing household voltage range of ~110 volts, at least five
times what should be seen at open circuit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNXtFUo4gbo

This is the first of two videos made today; will post the second one tommorrow
or so. The video showing operation of the bipolar TC system secondaries will
also be redone. HDN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASBwp-vqhYU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32KwpmBcXZc

Four months ago I posted the following to Yahoo Q&A.
Can a superior amp-turn ratio made with air core primaries vs secondary lead to
more heat output then inputed?

This is the curiosity that seems evident in working with 465 hz AC car
alternator circuits. In the cited cases the I^2R heat losses of the primary are
smaller then the I^2R secondary volumes. Essentially by using a high turns ratio
between primary and secondary, and then comparing heat losses between the two,
more heat loss comes from the secondary then does the primary. Have I made a
mistake here or is this okay?
Bert K, a top contributor replied;
This is absolutely okay.

Power is proportional to I^2
  Is = NIp
  R is proportional to number of turns
  = N Rt, Rt = resistance of one turn

Pp = Ip^2 Np Rtp = Ip^2 Rp
  Rp = NpRtp
  Ps =(Ip Np/Ns)^2 Rs = Ip^2 (Np/Ns)^2 Rs
  Rs = NsRts = NsRts/NpRtp Rp
  Ps = Ip^2 (Np/Ns)^2 NsRts/NpRtp Rp

Ps/Pp = (Np/Ns)(Rts/Rtp)

Sp power is greater in the secondary as the turns ratio, and inversely as the
resistance per turn (Np/Ns)(Rts/Rtp) For good design, the ratio is unity and the
powers are equal, but in any given case, that can result in your measurement
being correct.

Unfortunately I have not studied his reply full enough to know what he is
talking about. But here no matter how you stack things up, the secondary output
seems greater then the primary one. If you use the I^2R as the primary input we
found for the cited case in the video the .5 ohm primary having a current of
.18A should have a true power input equal to its heat loss I^2R quantity, or
.0162 watts. But applying the stame standard to the secondary we find .18144
watts with a 36 ma circulation through 140 ohms.

Now we go back to some fundamental understandings. The reactive measure of the
power input, or VI will ALWAYS be greater then its true power component I^2R,
BUT AT PERFECT SERIES RESONANCE THEY SHOULD EQUAL EACH OTHER. At the ideal
series resonance there is no timing or phase difference between the sinusoidal
quantities of V and I, and the currents if ideal will come to their ohms laws
value applied to AC. This is because V and I are simultaneous in time: V*I will
equal I^2R, and all the power input goes into heating the  conductor. Now lets
go back and measure the apparent power input to the primary where we have 1.1
volts enabling .18 A or .198 watts.
Since we have .1814 watts on secondary and.0162 watts on primary this gives a
total of .1976 watts total, just about the same .198 watts calculated by using
the apparent power. So the quandary exists as follows, even though we have been
taught that the apparent power is always greater then the true power input, in
this special case the apparent power is equal to the true power input, and then
VI = I^2R(prim)+ I^2R(sec). Perhaps the claims of overunity are not valid then,
but this particular situation we are tempted to assume that the ordinarily laws
of analysis have been turned topsy turvy. Initially it would seem that the power
input should only apply to the primary, not the primary and secondary as one
coupled unit, but it seems that is the only way solve the paradox.
HDN

Hello all,

New radio shows uploaded on VNN! Check it out:
http://VortexNetworkNews.com

Aurora and I discuss a convergence of events involving Comet Elenin. Not one
but three comets will be arriving, hence, fulfilling Hopi Prophecy?

I present and talk about Eric Dollard's 1996 fascinating lecture on Nikola
Tesla's Energy Technology. Nikola created Torsion Waves that travel at c x
Pi/2 or 1.57 times the speed of light! Torsion is simply a twisting of the
electromagnetic aether created by tension or stress and travels much FASTER
than c. This effect is accomplished using a flat transformer and was
beautifully demonstrated by Eric and his partner.

Michael talks about President Obama's cabal's Faked Birth Certificate, the
real facts about Osama Bin Laden's death, and the Real Reasons that Donald
Trump is running as the new Republican Presidential Candidate.

Radio that's out of this world! Only on VNN.

Bill

---
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ  85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
   URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

Uploading on you tube. Good performance of all components under 5A range.
Secondary arcing ~ 1/2 inch but very continuous, causing camera focus problems.
HDN

As mentioned before, the dual arc gap model for harnessing independent voltage
rises of secondaries above and below the 266 primary system is employed here,
and just because one (bottom weaker) side is not able to fire its arc gap, the
total system works well.
HDN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BP975Qu4IQ

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BP975Qu4IQ
Measures are being considered to get the bottom coil gap to fire. An extra coil
in series for the bottom end may be tried.
HDN

As indicated before getting both gaps to fire on the independent secondaries is
problematic. Apparent by concurrent amperage readings of both the top and bottom
secondaries the top secondary having the higher voltage will always fire on its
gap first, sort of monopolysing the action and preventing the bottom gap from
firing. The way the magnetic field action has shown itself is that if no output
is taken from the bottom secondary, more magnetic field goes out the top
secondary for interaction. But this allocation of magnetic field density
according to the recievers that are present does not work in reverse, probably
because of the phase rotation. So what is desired in this operation is to have
the weaker bottom side firing an arc gap, rather then the stronger side firing,
and having no firing on the bottom. Now every time the bottom gap fires, it
shorts out the higher currents on its LC loop, placing that amperage demand down
to its lower reactive conduction; thus making for more magnetic field to issue
to the top secondary.  More secondary current will be attained to every time the
bottom secondary short arc gap fires. What is needed for the top secondary is to
have a "weaker" arc gap, whereby adding resistance to the arc gap path was found
beneficial, now this higher resistance pathway including an arc gap in series
with the elements, this also means that "less" amperage conduction will be
diverted through that top stronger LC loop: and when that systems gap fires, it
probably doesnt reduce the short amperage to the components reactive value that
a direct short with associated TC primary in series normally approaches; where
here we are also assuming that the primary arc gap itself has minimal
resistance, which also may not be true. In any case by using this method, less
amperage drop in secondary circulation during arcing must be occuring; and in
this specific case the presence of amperage on phase 3 laying underneath the top
secondary LC loop IS PREVENTED from assuming its full value; PROVIDED the top
secondary currents stay near their full value; where this method hopes to
utilize that efficiency factor. The method uses a steel plate holding a ceramic
magnet with a glass of water suspended below a needle, which then arcs to the
water surface in a barely visible display. This method produces a very stable
oscillation. It was then further found that the ordinary method of supplying a
directly shorted arc gap to the top secondary would also work simultaneous to
the copper bar gap. This was done by taking the glass and magnet resistance out
of the series by shorting then and then attaching the plate clip to the water
itself, making this a simple water arc gap. So here we have two operations that
can be shown for you tube videos; will start soon.
HDN

Hello all,

On the PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR, I talk about Dr. Steven Jones public
domain overunity circuit:
http://pesn.com/2011/05/27/9501835_Steven_E_Jones_demonstrates_overunity_cir
cuit/

Professor Jones has developed a variation of the 'Joule Thief' circuit and
has shown evidence that its output is eight times greater (COP = 8) than the
input as measured by a state-of-the-art oscilloscope. He is open sourcing
his solid state design to help speed its development and implementation, as
well as to answer the scientific question of where the energy is coming
from.

During the first part of show, I talk about how THEY'RE sticking it to us
with higher energy cost this summer with NO government oversight or
protection:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/the_living_easy_the_driving_is_hard_9m
zb1aAfj4bpC8X63YYKhI#ixzz1NpuzjntE

"... Goldman Sachs' crystal ball is proclaiming that oil will soon soar to
$135 a barrel, and likely have service stations jacking up fuel prices to $5
a gallon in New York just like the summer of 2008 that preceded the
recession. ..."

Food, water, air and energy are all strategic weapons used by the NWO
against the people.
http://VortexNetworkNews.com

Bill

---
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ  85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
   URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

In this video the newer method for dual arc gaps is shown. The open circuit
voltage of operation before the loads are added is shown. Surprisingly no
significant drop of open circuit voltage after the circuit is engaged is noted.
When the system is pressed for more continuous primary arcing neccessary to
maintain a 1 inch secondary arc, the peculiarities of phases 2 & 3  voltage
delivery going above their no load state is then noted, but with a sporiadic
primary arc gap this effect is not so evident, but still it would seem the
delivery of amperage to the system should drop the voltage delivery down more
then it appears to do. Now I am thinking the system needs a ferromagnetic
transformer brought into the picture so that these voltage drops take place.
Running the alternator with a projected 15 volt field  as done in this video
should produce about 28 volts  open circuit operation:  this should  be coming
very close to field saturation.  This means the alternator should be getting hot
rather quickly and long duration runs at this level would not be advisable.

Ceramic Magnet/Glass/ Water Arc Gap for Strong Top Secondary
Conventional Arc Gap for Weak Bottom Secondary
Tests for 1 inch Top TC secondary arcing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfvUHNt1PpQ
Sincerely HDN

Now in the midst of spring planting after heavy rains in Spring in NE Ohio. We
are about 3 weeks behind schedule this year. I have several interesting cross
pollinations from last years tomato and pepper planting crop. Among thes are
miniature varieties of pepperonicci and hot hungarian wax pepper. Also a cross
between sungold and red, producing a red sungold,( sungold a delicious orange
cherry tomatoe). I also have several cross pollinations with black krim and
zebra that produces a small striped tomato. I do not know how these crops will
come out on second generation, as they say in botany there are predominant
traits, where the occasional cross pollination might be like a mullatto, where
the generation afterwards may revert to original genetic traits of the parent
mix. I got started on these things many years ago when I noticed that some of
the small cherry orange sungolds near a white beauty large tomatoe plant came
out white instead of yellow. That cross pollination is very stable, I have been
growing them generation after generation for ten years. It seems funny that the
year afte I got my scross pollination of white sungold, the Tomatoe Growers
Supply Seed Co from Florida where I purchase seed came out with this as a new
item. Many years they came out with cross pollinations similar to the ones I had
found. Lately many spin-offs of green zebra have been sold, I think last years
cross pollination was with a green grape varietie that also makes a striped
black grape size fruit when also cross pollinated with the black krim. In any
case I will save this years seed stock for any interested gardeners for next
years crop, and I saved some of the seed stock from last years cross
pollinations.I am now cleaning out the 110 gallon tank that when filled with
magnetized water, will hold a  feeble charge like a battery. Whether this is in
fact due to magnetizing the water will be seen.
Wed Jul 22, 2009
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/message/2429
A vortexian cone enables a water flow through the apex of a cone where a
transverse magnetic field is placed. Two silver electrodes are placed by
insulated wire means to the bottom of the tank and higher top section by
vertical height elevation to reside in the top third of the tank; consisting of
a 100 gallon poly cylindrical holding water container sold for gardening
purposes.

During the filling of the tank by the vortexian water movement, once a
continuity of the water flow establishes a continuity between differing
elevation points; a voltage potential difference can be read by meter, which is
predicted in some respect by Lenz law effect: only here the opposing magnetic
field made by the falling water results in an emf induced 3 dimension spin
imparted as a imprinted spin after the water falls into the tank. After the tank
is filled no further falling water is the cause of the voltage reading, but yet
the voltage still exists between the electrodes, a sort of water battery.

The tank then filled to 100 gallons registers a 1/3 volt (DC) reading.
Then the tank is drained until it registers half the voltage. Then a water pump
is used to remagnetise to same drained water, filling the tank back up again
which doubles the voltage reading again. this can be repeated over and over
again with the same results. So in a nutshell that is my magnetized water demo.
Sincerely HDN


A vortexian cone enables a water flow through the apex of a cone where a
transverse magnetic field is placed. Two silver electrodes are placed by
insulated wire means to the bottom of the tank and higher top section by
vertical height elevation to reside in the top third of the tank; consisting of
a 100 gallon poly cylindrical holding water container sold for gardening
purposes.

During the filling of the tank by the vortexian water movement, once a
continuity of the water flow establishes a continuity between differing
elevation points; a voltage potential difference can be read by meter, which is
predicted in some respect by Lenz law effect: only here the opposing magnetic
field made by the falling water results in an emf induced 3 dimension spin
imparted as a imprinted spin after the water falls into the tank. After the tank
is filled no further falling water is the cause of the voltage reading, but yet
the voltage still exists between the electrodes, a sort of water battery.

The tank then filled to 100 gallons registers a 1/3 volt (DC) reading.
Then the tank is drained until it registers half the voltage. Then a water pump
is used to remagnetise to same drained water, filling the tank back up again
which doubles the voltage reading again. this can be repeated over and over
again with the same results. So in a nutshell that is my magnetized water demo.
Sincerely HDN


http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/WAT/Dsc00254.jpg
DC Voltage Measurment Of .58 volts on Filled Tank
Magnetized Water Demo

I keep getting the idea that this might work.  Imagine a toroid or ring, say its
horizontally suspended on rollers or something. Inside the ring are coils that
produce magnetic fields. A typical motor or for that matter an alternator has a
part that rotates, and a part that does not. There always seems to be magnetic
field interaction between the part that moves and the that doesn't; whereby the
rotation itself consists of mechanical forces that are reacting against the
stable reference frame of the part that does not move. Now if somehow that part
that doesn't move could also pivot or rotate on the same axis as the rotating
part; then no rotation should take place, it would be like a fan on a boat
blowing its own sail to propel itself. The reaction forces should cancel each
other out. So essentially if we have a stack of coils on this ring so that they
made a complete circle with all of these coils having adjacent poles, no matter
how we divided up our electrical inputs to those ring coils, we shouldn't be
able to make that total ring rotate on its rollers; because no stable reference
point for the magnetic fields to pull or push against could be established. Now
lets say we further disect the problem. Let us say the top of every coil is
attracted to the neighbor on its ring; and the bottom of that coil is repelled
by its neighbor on the ring. In totality of course the forces are still
cancelling however.  But what if we had a way of making one force of repulsion
WEAKER then its opposite magnetic force of ATTRACTION? This is exactly what the
266 primary system does.
Scopings of 266 and 263 Machine Polar Areas
http://youtu.be/pUlKUgzW81Y
Boy did I mess this demo up!
in any case on the front sensor flipping the coil over changes things, but on
the back one it dont!!!  I forgot the reason for that for now, maybe I can
explain it later when it comes to me. Or better yet repeat this demo again on
you tube without making the first mistake when I said flipping the coil over
doesnt change the scoping... I will load the pics for 263 and 266 primaries
now...
HDN

263 Primary Scoping (dual channel polar exits of stacks)
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/266pri/263pri.jpg
Scoping of 266 primary polar exits
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/266pri/266pri.jpg
266 primary layerings with no field amperage
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/266pri/3phstacked.jpg

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/266pri/

As I was saying, sending 15 volts into the alternator field  to produce a 28-30
volt stator level at this 465 hz rpm is an excessive amount close to projected
field saturation.  What was theorized and now demonstrated is that instead of
having this high input voltage for the common operation of the alternator, we
can instead introduce a ferromagnetic transformer between the source and its
load. Since ph1; the bottom layer of the 266 primary system is primarily
responsible for firing the arc gap from the weaker voltage present on the bottom
secondary; we introduce a 4/1 step up transformer between the stator lines, and
then connect the former lines up to the transformer secondary.  This practice
seems to produce the same secondary 1 inch arcing set for tests; at only 2/3 the
amount of field current.

A turn on today of 266 primary set up showed 147 volts from the top secondary
and 100 volts on the bottom.  After introduction of 4/1 step up transformer on 
bottom ph1, its input voltage went down upon secondary loading where the new
conditions became 112 volts on top secondary and 180 volts on bottom secondary.

Thus the phase needed to fire the primary arc gap will now fire before the field
currents and stator voltages become excessive. Will make video soon.

HDN

The amperage meter for phase 1 remains on the phase itself; between the L and C
quantities. However the primary of the transformer that feeds that phase should
be drawing four times as much amperage by ratio. Thus phase 1 is actually being
loaded down far more then the adjacent phases which employ no transformer. 
Because of this the stator voltage from the alternator serving phase 1 is
reduced far below the other phases; and again those other phases exhibit a
voltage input ABOVE the value they would exhibit if no load was present. The
discrepancy of unequal amperage deliveries to phases is shown by the top stator
line meters. A 10 volt field is used, rather then a 15 volt one as done in the
last demonstration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZmlp4hMxmE
Sincerely HDN

Graduated Input Parameters for  Bipolar Wireless TC/ 4/1 Step Up Transformer
Employed on Bottom ph. 1.
By noting operation at 10,20 and 30 volts variac input to field,, the ratios of
received currents for each phase can be compared. Ordinarily this ratio would 
be constant for a linear increase of power input. If it is not constant,
torsional considerations may apply. This is undoubtably true with the flux
capacitor, the ratios of currents between resonances will not show a linear
relationship upon increase of currents to those devices. This video may proove
useful for making later comparisons, as the time for making good meter
observations were made with good lighting. The action of the water arc gap for
the top secondary is shown. Remarkably the coil using the weaker influences of
the top secondary arc gap, and it's apparently weak water arc gap actually
display the strongest influence on it's associated secondary column.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkdkqebfM-o
Sincerely Harvey D Norris.

http://www.damninteresting.com/teslas-tower-of-power/

Hello all,

This week on the Progressive Technology Hour (http://VortexNetworkNews.com):
During the first half hour, I talk about the work of Les Kraut:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Les_Kraut

During the second half of the show, I talk about Andrea Rossi's patent
being delayed by the US Patent office. Ordinarily, if Andrea was a US
citizen, his patent would be reviewed by the three letter US agencies,
promptly stamped "Classified" and seized, and given a gag order NOT to
mention a word about the invention.
http://pesn.com/2011/06/07/9501841_Patent_Office_Forces_E-Cat_Self-Destruct_Capa\
bility/

In addition, he would be threatened with a $10,000 fine and 2 years
imprisonment based upon the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/invention/35usc17.html

Bill

--
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ 85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

Hey Ulley, check this site out, it says that stars exist as brown dwarfs that do
not emit visible light.  If they are not big enough,(only several times the
diameter of Jupiter), then nuclear fusion does not happen, BUT nuclear fusion
still occurs because of the deuterium isotopes present in the hydrogen mass.
Interesting stuff. I have an interesting project coming up that will need some
signal generator testing. My current tesla coils are tuned for 250,000 hz. But
what makes them resonate at that freq is the top domes of inverted salad bowls.
It is this top load capacity that REDUCES the 2 ft TC's secondary down in
frequency from what it would have without that top load. What I plan to do is to
take the top load off and replace it with some 1600 ft of wire present on my
outside large diameter coil. Originally I had the ending of that coil wire
length attached to the small neon bulb, which in turn was connected to the
grounded top brass dome. However the
  birds have made nests on the tower and also inside the top dome: and the ending
neon has become disconnected from the top dome. This means that the old process
of using a 60 hz resonance to make the bulb blink no longer works, because it
has lost its ground connection. However if I substituted my 465 hz alternator
powered TC as the input, and replaced the top capacity of salad bowls with the
~1600 ft of wire, it should be possible to negotiate a tuning near the needed
250,000 hz. If that can be done the alternator powered TC should be able to
light the ending neon bulb without having the former direct wire ground
connection. Actually from looking at the bulb some 25 ft high, it looks like the
bulb ending now may be very close now the the metal in the tower itself. I
should be able to see arcing from the bulb to the tower itself if every thing is
tuned correctly. (This is definitely a night time experiment.) So the first
thing I need to do is make some
  signal generator sweeps to find out what the new resonant frequency of the
system is. If it is not near 250,000 hz, I can compensate by either adding or
subtracting primary winds around the TC. I should never have used wood glue on
the support pieces for the outside windings, as many of these have fallen out of
place. I'm going to have Jim help repair these things using nails instead. It
definitely needs done before all the windings start coming undone, then I'll
have a real mess on my hands.  Just thought I'd give you an update on whats
going on with my experimentation. See ya later dude.
HDN


 
http://astroblogger.blogspot.com/2011/06/comet-elenin-is-not-satellite-of-brown.\
html