This happened many years ago by now... it was a very illogical thing that I
think was explained with three steps. The same issues come up now with the
classifications of actions of secondary air core transformers, so the precedents
of action must first be stated, as those comparison are useful. The discovery of
ferromagnetic RESONANCE was the fact that a certain capacity on the high voltage
end of the transformer would cause the input voltage application to go up; where
in that condition the draw from the energy source would exceed that of a direct
short; where essentially that special load literally sucked power from the
generator. Due to this special effect and judicial design negotiated by the
proper C value exhibiting this effect on the output end of the transformer, the
first generation of alternator powered tesla coils were established at that
time. It was much later from this early date that later wireless designs came
into play. So here going back to archives we have;
The Development of the Alternator Powered Tesla Coil
Wed Oct 29, 2008
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/message/2175
(Notice many wrong conclusions and outdated URL,s)
Here is the landmark article I have prepared for some time now, which
will be the first of a series in this investigation. The second
article will be entitled the "The Theory of Motionally Induced EMF
Resonance". Here in this first article the use of the scope as the
research tool is examplified. Further complications can later be
shown when measuring the phase angle between air core primary and
secondaries, but for now the ferro-resonant effect is shown. Without
further adieu here is the prepared article;

The Development of the Alternator Powered Tesla Coil

An ordinary Delco Remy car alternator with diodes removed to
output 3 phases of 456 hz to power a tesla coil via pole pig
transformer is shown. It can be shown and argued by voltage and
amperage measurements that the alternator can input more energy to the
TC then the 60hz 15,000 volt/ 30 ma NST, and this is quite unexpected
to say the least since only one of three phases of the AC alternator
are utilized. The 456 hz TC utilizes a smaller primary and 2.5 times
the capacity the the NST design utilizes.
In the alternator/pole pig connection I have procured a
special situation whereby the capacitance employed in the TC primary
is reflected through the pole pig primary connection to the alternator
stator windings so as to resonate producing two useful effects, but
first the understanding of the principle of maximum energy transfer is
noted, so that the comparison of actual currents and voltages can be
compared to this theory of maximum energy transfer. Generally
speaking the two specifications noting the ability of the source of
emf to produce power are given; these are the open circuit voltage
without a load attached, and the current that source can deliver when
a short is applied. What the maximum energy transfer theorem implies
is that when the open circuit voltage is cut in half by the amount of
load attached, this is the point of maximum energy transfer, but in
this situation only half of the short rating of available amperage
conduction is available. Thus the maximum power or voltage times
amperage from the source is actually each of these ratings cut in half
and then multiplied together, yielding one quarter of what would be
available if the power ratings of open circuit voltage and short
measurement of amperage were simply multiplied together. Thus this
maximum power output of the NST should be [15,000 V* .03A]/4 = 112.5
watts. Now the same procedure is applied to the alternator phase as a
source of power. Because of the fact that the pole face field rotor
becomes remanently magnetized,(in the correct polarity determined by
its spin), the moment the alternator is turned on these voltage and
amperage ratings become apparent. All three phases then read 1.6 -1.7
volts and a short of one of the phases shows a delivery of 1.35 A. Now
the pole pig is attached to one of the phases with the addition of an
amperage meter set on its highest scale without the secondary load of
the TC primary attached. This one threw me a loop because on the
testing of two different higher voltage transformers, both amperage
readings of the non loaded primary read 0 Amps. Apparently the open
secondary condition of the pole pig transformer that determines the
highest impedance of the primary has a non-linear response to the
increase of frequency, where here the increase in frequency being 7.6
fold would mean 7.6 times less primary amperage conduction to the
unloaded pole pig primary, but that may not be happening and later the
actual ratio of expected currents vs derived currents can be
calculated to show the non-linear increase of impedance with increased
frequency. This has been noted before with the stolen high induction
air core coils that exhibited 60 henry at 60 hz, but exhibited values
near 200 henry at these frequencies.
Now the first attempt of showing an alternator powered TC
involved first making one at 60 hz powered by the NST, and that also
was problematic but we arrived at a hit/miss solution with a 2 ft
secondary with a larger top capacity that improved performance so as
to exhibit 4 inch arcing. This model uses 20 nf capacity. When the
alternator/pole pig combination was substituted as the power source
the same coil only delivered 1 inch arcing, but even this was a first.
Jumping the gun a bit, the alternator/ pole pig power source was
reexamined to see if the capacity in the TC primary was near the
maximum energy transfer point. A turn on of the alternator yielded 3
phases of 1.6 volts before the field is energized, where the middle
phase 2 is selected for the pole pig. As mentioned no amperage is
recorded into the pole pig primary until the secondary capacitive load
of the TC primary is added. With the arc gap separated and the field
non- energized a series of amperage conduction and voltage output
tests are made. The short as mentioned yields 1.35 A of a single
phase, and an open circuit value of 1.6 volts. When the TC primary
value of 20 nf was added to the pole pig secondary its primary
amperage went from 0 to .66 A, but the source voltage of 1.6 Volts did
not decrease its value to half, which is what a purely resistive load
should do by the premises of the maximum energy transfer theorem,
where it is assumed that having reached half of the short value of
conduction will also reduce the source voltage by half. Instead what
happens is that the stator voltage is increased by one third to 2.2
volts. So initially measuring things on the high voltage end for these
circumstances, and also considering that since such low voltages are
being employed non-linearities of voltage transformation may exist
since this is the very low end of the saturation curve of the
transformer, but nevertheless the first recording of output voltages
showed 123.5 volts without the capacity attached and 184 volts when it
is attached. Now all these measurements and comparisons of ratios seem
to become distorted from their initially measured values at this
lowest possible level of measurement conducted with an un-energized
field, and these differences can be shown in comparison at real
operation with an energized field with a 10 Amp pole pig primary
consumption, and after the TC had been redesigned to employ the
nearest correct resonant secondary capacity to be determined by these
unenergized field tests to be noted next. In that case after the TC
primary was redesigned and the correct C value used, it was noted that
by sending a third of an amp through the field, this created three
phases of 7.1 volts with no load attached, but then attaching the TC
primary to the pole pig secondary resulted in the primary stator
voltage now going up 60 % to 11.5 volts. Thus at only a 7 volt
unloaded stator it becomes 11.5 volts conducting 10 amps into the pole
pig primary, and the alternator can be pressed to do triple this duty
for short periods of time, sending near 30 amps into the pole pig primary.
Now getting back to the un-energized field tests, the next thing
to be explored was the value of primary amperage consumption once the
registered level of 184 volts at the pole pig secondary was shorted,
and this yielded only a 1 amp primary consumption, when in fact a
direct short of the stator lines connected to the current limited
supply of the alternator yielded 1.35 A. This at first puzzled me so
then obviously the next thing to do was to try various values of
capacity for a pole pig secondary load. The capacities being used are
a series string of five .1 uf values yeilding 20 nf. Taking one out of
the string yields 25 nf, two taken out yeilds 33nf, and next a value
of 50 nf. Note how the adjacent stator phase voltages having no load
are influenced by phase 2's pole pig primary load.

Un-energized field tests initially yield three phases of 1.6 volts.
With 20 nf pole pig secondary load the stator voltages and amperages
become;

Stator phase 1; 1.6 volts
Stator phase 2; 2.2 volts yielding .66 A to pole pig primary

Stator phase 3; 2.0 volts
Using 25 nf phase 2 then outputs .9 A
with its stator voltage rising to 2.3 volts, showing 204 volts at the
arc bars. Using 33 nf;

Stator phase 1) 1.5 volts
Stator phase 2) 2.8
volts yields 1.55 A primary draw, it has exceeded its short value of
1.35A and also yielding 253 volts at arc bars
Stator phase 3) 2.5 volts





Using 50 nf;
This begins to load down stator phase
1, which along with phase 3 is unloaded, so we wonder why the
dramatic loss here on phase 1 which gets now get reduced to what the
rms voltage meter interprets as 0.7 volts and now some scopings are
made of the phase angle differences between the affected phases.
Initially it is assumed that the 3 phase alternator distributes three
maximum voltages 120 degrees out of phase and an unloaded scoping of
phases 2 and 3 as a dual channel scoping shows this fact, but first
the proper procedure for making these scope observations is noted.
First an isolated ground for the scope itself is desired which is
enabled by using a 2 prong plug into the wall voltage instead of three
prong plug for the oscilloscope which is simply achieved by use of a
two prong adapter. Now it is also observed that the common ground
connection between the scope leads themselves is in fact a common
ground point, except for perhaps very expensive scopes having dual
isolated grounds on each channel. What this means is that the first
channel to be scoped uses both the probe ending and the smaller clip
as the ground. But the second channel when added only uses the probe
lead, and its ground connection is left open. The attachments for
the measurement of the adjacent phase once the first two connections
are made must be referenced to the placement of the ground clip on the
initial connection, which becomes channel 1 making a voltage
measurement of phase 2. The alternator delta output has three points
of voltage delivery, and to reference the phase 2's primary connection
to be loaded by the pole pig secondary load of 50 nf, to the phase 3
which also sees a voltage rise from phase 2's reactive loading, the
common ground clip of the first channel is made to be the point of
delivery on the delta stator where both phase 2 and 3 have in common,
and channel 2's probe lead is given the remaining delta point not yet
attached with its common ground lead unattached. In other words the
common ground leads must not be shorted in making the dual channel
scoping observations, and since there are three points of voltage
reference and four points available to make these voltage reference
observations, one of the common leads must be omitted. To reference
phase 2 and 3 the common ground of only one channel is placed on the
delta triangle on the point where the phases themselves are in common,
and thus to measure the referenced voltage between the other
combination of phases 1 and 2 the common lead is changed to the point
in common on the delta triangle that the measured phases themselves
have in common. The first two dual channel scopings are referenced
between phases 2 and 3, both of which receive a voltage rise after
phase 2's addition of the pole pig primary load.
Three Wire/ Dual Channel Scoping of 3 phase Alternator between phases
2 and 3.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/TD/Picture%20143.jpg

After addition of the pole pig to phase two the following changes in
actual phase angle shown by scoping between the phases are noted;

Stator phase 2 shows
2.6 volts yielding 2.4 A primary draw, a 80 % increase in the
alternator established current limitation and 262 volts at the arc
bars! Note here another discrepancy in that the pole pig normally
gives a 64/1 voltage rise ratio but here it has become 100 fold. A
measurement of the actual current that should ensue for a 50 nf
capacitive reactance at 456 hz having an ohmic resistance of 6984
ohms @ 262 volts however shows that these values are in agreement with
current meter readingsof 37.5 ma on the secondary end, and it is seen
that although the voltage rise ratio has been expanded, the current
ratio of primary amperage consumption and secondary amperage output
has been preserved at 64/1. Note here also that the open circuit
voltage vs capacitively loaded operating voltage has been increased
some 60 %/ in reference to the previous dual channel scoping
Stator phase 3) 2.6 volts
Phase Angle Change between phases 2 & 3 with Pole Pig Ferromagnetic
Resonance
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/TD/Picture%20146.jpg
Note the pulsed nature on phase 2, and the stretching of the former
120 phase angle towards that of a 180 one. This scoping shows
something initially incomprehensible. EVIDENTLY THE THREE FOLD
DIVISION OF VOLTAGE REFERENCE POINTS IN TIME DELIVERED BY THE THREE
PHASE WYE CONNECTED STATOR WINDINGS PRODUCING A DELTA OUTPUT CAN BE
ALTERED IN TIME THEMSELVES! As an apparent result of this the
voltage normally available on phase 1 has been robbed from to provide
an excess of voltage on its adjacent phases, where its rms voltage
reading shows only .7 volts. We might expect that since the timings
of voltage delivery have been brought near 180 degrees between phases
2 and 3, this leaves very little phase angle difference left in 360
degrees of total time available between cycles on phase 1 which we
then term a “neutrally” timed phase because of its loss of voltage;
however we still wish to investigate this timing issue by making a
scoping to be made referencing phase 1 to the other phases where here
phase 1 is referenced to the pig draw of phase 2:
Near 180 phase shift referenced to neutral angle in time
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/HDN/Picture%20148.jpg
What becomes odd here is the non sinusoidal shape of the neutral
phase which the rms voltage meter interprets as .7 volts,and all the
scopings are made at 2/volts/div. Because of this waveform shape the
phasing angle difference of the adjacent phase is hard to determine,
but we would certainly expect that the peaks of each waveform should
co-incide better. In fact the smaller dual peaked portion of phase 1's
waveform does this, but its larger one peaking at some 1.8 volts
appears in the timing reference point when the adjacent phase is
producing 2 volts in opposite polarity!??... Thus here the
presentation of an incredible premise can be made;
THE CREATION OF THREE OPPOSITES IN TIME.
What I have just shown is two oppositely phased voltages whose highest
peaks deliver almost opposite polarities in time, thus the net
difference between the voltages is almost the sum of their individual
voltages. Next I showed the voltage reference points to the neutral
phasing showing that the adjacent phase voltage can still have better
then an equal and opposite simultaneously created voltage in time. I
have also been able use pancake coils positioned in space at certain
angles to each other to interact to show an impossible phase angle
greater then 180 degrees as we define it, in that the net difference
between the individual voltages in time is greater then the sum of
these quantities, but this issue has not been scoped out yet to see
what nuances of waveforms may exist there. Again the analogy of
dimensional progression is applied here. A two dimensional flat
equilateral triangle has three internal 60 degree angles, adding to
180. If we instead expand the internal area of this triangle by
superimposing it on the 3-D curvature of a sphere, we find that now
the individual angles become greater then the sum adding to 180,
according to the ratio of the triangles internal area vs the total
surface area of the sphere. If we just use a small portion of the
sphere's surface area for the triangle the internal angle change is
negligible, but if the triangle is expanded to encompass 1/8th of the
total surface area of the sphere, its internal 60 degree angle will
have increased 50% to 90 degrees. Now the analogy becomes expanding
the three 120 degree phase angles in time 50 % greater to that of
three 180 phase angles in time. Somehow we presume that now a 4th
dimensional coordinate has been added, with the result that time has
been expanded, and a circle in time of phase angle differences no
longer adds to 360 degrees, but in excess to that. A 440 degree
phasing measurement is shown at
13 meter reading of 3 DSR's(Delta Series Resonances of .15 Henry)/
showing interphasal voltage differences between phasings.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/IRC/Dsc00509.jpg


Using 100nf now the demand begins to exceed the supply and the stator
phases are all reduced to
1) 0.7 volts
2) 0.5 volts yielding .68 A primary draw producing 91 volts at
secondary, showing perhaps another unusual thing where we cannot
predict the secondary voltage output merely by the primary amperage
draw but must also consider the input primary voltage.
3) 1.4 volts.

So obviously 50 nf becomes the first convenient value to select and by
downsizing the primary from the previous NST design, superior arcing
and power input seems available from the alternator 456 hz pole pig
combination vs a single 60 hz NST. A higher power stator voltage
reading shows that sending .8 A through field yields
1) 8.8 volts
2) 32.6 volts to pole pig primary where if we assume linearity of the
10 amp measurement @ 11.5 volts, this becomes a 28 amp draw at 32
volts input yeilding 924 watts possible input power vs the noted 112
watts for the NST example.
3) 29 volts

Note that phase 3's voltage has not yet been severely loaded down, so
our next piece of work will be to add a TC system to that phase, so
that two somewhat oppositely phased TC's can be interacted together at
their top terminals. It now does not seem far off in speculation for a
three phase TC application with three identical TC's powered by a
three phase high voltage transformer, which is also at my disposal for
these experiments.
To close here let us consider the voltage differences available
from the NST vs pole pig/alternator combo. We might assume that 32
volts input becomes 62 fold through the pole pig transformer becomes
near 2000 volts so the ratio to 15,000 volts would be 13 %. But then
again this amount of energy transfers 7.6 times faster at 456 hz and
multiplying .13 by 7.6 yields the original amount. But since the V
term is exponential it would seem that 60 hz @ 15,000 volts should
have more energy transfer, however it may be true that since the 20 nf
value being used is over four times the rated current limitation of
the NST secondary, that it may only charge those caps to 1/4 of its
15,000 voltage rating? And additionally the value of capacity used for
the alternator pole pig combination is 2.5 times higher at 50 nf,
which the NST may not even be able to fire. In any case I have made
my argument that that alternator can out-power the NST with the 456 hz
driven TC here shown at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/ATC/DSCN3889.JPG
Sincerely
Harvey D Norris

Hello all,

Aurora and Doctor Whodini's returning guest this week is Alien
Scientist. To listen to our latest show, please visit:
http://VortexNetworkNews.com/

They start the show by reviewing Alien Scientist's latest and brilliant
analysis of the Mastermind's behind 9/11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LDdRVthqQU

Alien Scientist exposes the entire Israeli/Neocon apparatus that made
9/11 possible.

Are you an inventor? Did you know that every patent application is
reviewed by the three letter US agencies and if YOUR patent is a THREAT
to the National Security (Nanny) State, it's promptly stamped
"Classified" and seized (stolen), and YOUR given a gag order NOT to
mention a word about YOUR invention.
http://pesn.com/2011/06/07/9501841_Patent_Office_Forces_E-Cat_Self-Destruct_Capa\
bility/


In addition, YOU will be threatened with a $10,000 fine and 2 years
imprisonment based upon the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 if you tell
the public about the invention:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/invention/35usc17.html

Enjoy the OUTRAGE!

Bill

--
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ 85028
PHONE: 480-588-8155
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkn4t-A5lSs

Invention Secrecy Act is unconstitutional.  It stands because no one has the
balls to challenge it.  First Amendment: Congress may make no law ... abridging
the freedom of speech...

Andy

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, Doctor Whodini <doctor_whodini03@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Aurora and Doctor Whodini's returning guest this week is Alien
> Scientist. To listen to our latest show, please visit:
> http://VortexNetworkNews.com/
>
> They start the show by reviewing Alien Scientist's latest and brilliant
> analysis of the Mastermind's behind 9/11:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LDdRVthqQU
>
> Alien Scientist exposes the entire Israeli/Neocon apparatus that made
> 9/11 possible.
>
> Are you an inventor? Did you know that every patent application is
> reviewed by the three letter US agencies and if YOUR patent is a THREAT
> to the National Security (Nanny) State, it's promptly stamped
> "Classified" and seized (stolen), and YOUR given a gag order NOT to
> mention a word about YOUR invention.
>
http://pesn.com/2011/06/07/9501841_Patent_Office_Forces_E-Cat_Self-Destruct_Capa\
bility/
>
>
> In addition, YOU will be threatened with a $10,000 fine and 2 years
> imprisonment based upon the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 if you tell
> the public about the invention:
> http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/invention/35usc17.html
>
> Enjoy the OUTRAGE!
>
> Bill
>
> --
> William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
> PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
> 10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
> Phoenix, AZ 85028
> PHONE: 480-588-8155
> URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/
>

Several investigations into the ability of these circuits to function as air
core transformers are investigated. However the aim of the endeavor has not been
fulfilled. No Grand time expansion device is found, rather the machine shrinks
time. However it is one of a kind, so things that can be done with the device
can be shown.
     When I say it is one of a kind, you can be sure of that, by the simple fact
that it has not been done before, and if it is, then it has not been recorded in
my history. This 666 machine is only an experiment with balance, and to know the
history of balance we use three interactions for the first example of the idea;
known as the 266 primary wafering system. Three pancake coils wafered for
maximum mutual inductance,  and where the middle layer is given a polarity
reversal so that the middle magnetic field influence is a sixth of a cycle off
instead of a third; in regards to the three phase input given to the assembly,
we find that the middle layer by its position of the phase rotation will repel
the magnetic field better on one side of the wafering, then the other side: for
the simple fact that the middle influence being one sixth of a cycle off the
outer line connection voltages serving those outer layerings; IT PRODUCES THE
REPULSIVE FIELD "BEFORE THE LINE CONNECTIONS ON ONE SIDE; PRODUCING A STRONGER
FIELD",
then the opposite side experiencing an "after effect of inductive currents after
the source line connections have caused the currents to exist, resulting in a
ripple superimposed on its usual sinusoidal actions.
HDN.....

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> Several investigations into the ability of these circuits to function as air
core transformers are investigated. However the aim of the endeavor has not been
fulfilled. No Grand time expansion device is found, rather the machine shrinks
time. However it is one of a kind, so things that can be done with the device
can be shown.
>     When I say it is one of a kind, you can be sure of that, by the simple
fact that it has not been done before, and if it is, then it has not been
recorded in my history. This 666 machine is only an experiment with balance, and
to know the history of balance we use three interactions for the first example
of the idea; known as the 266 primary wafering system. Three pancake coils
wafered for maximum mutual inductance,  and where the middle layer is given a
polarity reversal so that the middle magnetic field influence is a sixth of a
cycle off instead of a third; in regards to the three phase input given to the
assembly, we find that the middle layer by its position of the phase rotation
will repel the magnetic field better on one side of the wafering, then the other
side: for the simple fact that the middle influence being one sixth of a cycle
off the outer line connection voltages serving those outer layerings; IT
PRODUCES THE REPULSIVE FIELD "BEFORE THE LINE CONNECTIONS ON ONE SIDE; PRODUCING
A STRONGER FIELD",
> then the opposite side experiencing an "after effect of inductive currents
after the source line connections have caused the currents to exist, resulting
in a ripple superimposed on its usual sinusoidal actions.
> HDN.....
The idea then spread in furthermance of principle where it was decided that each
of three phases should function to supply the middle repulsive magnetic portion
in its designated stack of three. Each phase would then contain three elements
in series on the geometry, where the elements on the phases spiralled around
each other. In fact those inductive measurements showed that the inductance of
each phase would be increased by 33%, and those readings were balanced. But once
the phases were given the predicted capacities by current measurements; the end
results became inbalanced, very typical in this experimentation. HDN

I have not covered this subject well. It probably falls into magnifier ideas,
whereby three resonant circuits come into play, instead of the normal two. It is
possible for the middle element to be a conveyor in some sence, in that its
current from induction itself  will be reduced, but is reproduced on the
inductor on its opposing pole face. In turn when that is done the source sees an
increased current. These things will be shown in later videos.
HDN

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@> wrote:
> >
> > Several investigations into the ability of these circuits to function as air
core transformers are investigated. However the aim of the endeavor has not been
fulfilled. No Grand time expansion device is found, rather the machine shrinks
time. However it is one of a kind, so things that can be done with the device
can be shown.
> >     When I say it is one of a kind, you can be sure of that, by the simple
fact that it has not been done before, and if it is, then it has not been
recorded in my history. This 666 machine is only an experiment with balance, and
to know the history of balance we use three interactions for the first example
of the idea; known as the 266 primary wafering system. Three pancake coils
wafered for maximum mutual inductance,  and where the middle layer is given a
polarity reversal so that the middle magnetic field influence is a sixth of a
cycle off instead of a third; in regards to the three phase input given to the
assembly, we find that the middle layer by its position of the phase rotation
will repel the magnetic field better on one side of the wafering, then the other
side: for the simple fact that the middle influence being one sixth of a cycle
off the outer line connection voltages serving those outer layerings; IT
PRODUCES THE REPULSIVE FIELD "BEFORE THE LINE CONNECTIONS ON ONE SIDE; PRODUCING
A STRONGER FIELD",
> > then the opposite side experiencing an "after effect of inductive currents
after the source line connections have caused the currents to exist, resulting
in a ripple superimposed on its usual sinusoidal actions.
> > HDN.....
> The idea then spread in furthermance of principle where it was decided that
each of three phases should function to supply the middle repulsive magnetic
portion in its designated stack of three. Each phase would then contain three
elements in series on the geometry, where the elements on the phases spiralled
around each other. In fact those inductive measurements showed that the
inductance of each phase would be increased by 33%, and those readings were
balanced. But once the phases were given the predicted capacities by current
measurements; the end results became inbalanced, very typical in this
experimentation. HDN
>
BECAUSE OF THE END CURRENTS AND VOLTAGE SEPARATION OBSERVATIONS WE MUST 
CONCLUDE THAT NO TIME SEPARATION EXISTS BETWEEN THE THREE MAGNETIC FIELDS
OBSERVED ON THE THREE POLES OF SIX FACES. THUS ANY COLLECTION OF PROPERLY WIRED
SECONDARIES, THEMSELVES IDENTICAL TO THE UNITS EMPLOYED ON THE PHASES THEMSELVES
FUNCTIONING AS POLE FACES TO THOSE ADJACENT SECONDARIES SHOULD ENABLE AN
EFFICIENT CONVERSION OF PRIMARY ENERGY TO SECONDARY; BUT THIS IS BASED ON THE
IDEA THAT THE SECONDARIES THEMSELVES ARE ALSO COUPLED TO RESONANT CAPACITIES
ACTING AS A TUNED CIRCUIT COUPLED WITH THE PRIMARIES ALSO EMPLOYING THEIR
RESPECTIVE RESONANT CAPACITIES.

HERE A VERY SPECIAL THING ABOUT MUTUAL INDUCTION AND TUNED CIRCUITS NEEDS TO BE
NOTED. THE CAPACITIES USED TO TUNE THE 666 PANCAKE MACHINE ARE SOLELY BASED ON
THE MAGNETIC INTERACTIONS ENGAGED BETWEEN THE PHASES IN SPACE.

ONCE WE ADD AN EXTERIOR INDUCTOR AROUND ITS OUTSIDE SPACE ON THESE POLE FACES,
THIS ACTUALLY ALSO CHANGES THE REACTIVE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH ITS INITIAL
TUNING WAS BASED ON, SO THEORETICALLY SPEAKING IF THIS WERE DRAMATICALLY TRUE
C(INT) MUST CHANGE WITH RESPECT TO NOT ONLY A REACTIVE CHANGE BROUGHT ABOUT
EXTERIOR INDUCTIVE OUTPUTS, BUT IT SHOULD ALSO CHANGE AGAIN WHEN THAT SECONDARY
EMPLOYS ITS OWN C(EXT) IN ITS RECEPTIVE LOOP.

BECAUSE OF THIS RELATIVITY A CERTAIN STANDARD NEEDS TO BE ESTABLISHED,  AND THAT
STANDARD IS THE C VALUE FOR EACH COMPONENT TO RESONATE IN ISOLATION. ONLY IN THE
666 MACHINE WAS THIS STANDARD CHANGED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE MUTUAL INDUCTION
BETWEEN PHASES. THIS MODIFICATION DID NOT OCCUR IN THE 266 PRIMARY SYSTEM, WHERE
THERE EACH WAFER WAS TECHNICALLY GIVEN AN INCORRECT CAPACITY TO RESONATE,
BECAUSE THAT 45 UF VALUE WAS OBTAINED WITHOUT MUTUAL INDUCTION EFFECTS.

The astute student of resonant effects may have said, yeah Harvey you're doing
everything the wrong way. But for me to say the least thing to be said was the
greatest, and it doesn't matter what capacities those coils employ when they are
brought together, but I could be wrong, I just never tried to tune the(266)
monster. But one thing is for sure, it has to be retuned according to addition
of load. So on the start of experimental observations we may be working on
looking at an inefficient translation because we do not change C(INT), only we
change C(EXT) as the receptor. here we find C(EXT) shows the secondary to have a
very wide band resonance, and the expected drop off of received current with
added capacity does not occur as outlined in texts.

BUT TO FURTHER EXPLORE

Steve Elswick -- steve@...

Publisher/Editor - ExtraOrdinary Technology

520-463-1904 - http://www.teslatech.info

Coming to the 2012 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

In Albuquerque New Mexico�  July 26-July 29???

2011 Conference DVDs are available here:

http://www.teslatech.info/ttstore/conftapes/teslatech/etcframe.htm

Ordinarily this was thought to be a delusion based on the changes of circuit
condition in going from an open loaded state to that of the designated load.
Ordinarily of course, by the laws of maximum energy transfer, every load will
draw the voltage of its source down according to the ratio of R(int)/R(load);
where at unity maximum energy transfer is predicted, but this is done at the
consequence of lowering the open circuit voltage by half, on application of that
load.

Now exceptions to this rule are encountered with interphasal resonant loads
whereby an illusion is brought into play by manipulations of this maximum energy
transfer principle. It is seen that once the interphasal series resonant load is
added between TWO of the outer delta series resonant phases voltage rises;(hence
the term interphasal); that interphasal voltage source should be treated to the
same analysis of maximum energy transfer that was used in the circuit behind it.
And it is here that we find that the addition of this "further resonant circuit"
in the three phase network loads it's interphasal source of voltage down far
past the point of a 50% reduction, in fact because of this; LESS VOLTAGE AND
CURRENT will be obtained across that branch then what it will ordinarily permit,
for the simple reason that new second generation R(int)/R(load) ratios come into
play, and apparently here the selected interphasal resonance has caused its
source voltage to deviate more then expected by those new ratios.

Now the delusion is brought into play when that secondary line connected
interphasal resonance is inductively coupled to another identical air core
resonance at their poles. NOW, it is immediately seen that since the former
interphasal line connected coil is now viewed as a primary/ and the addition of
its equal volume as the secondary LC loop; this all collectively changes the
internal resistance, or actually internal impedance of that primary reflecting
that value back to it's source of voltage; with the net result that the voltage
across the primary appears to increase upon addition of the secondary in space,
hence the secondary appears to be powering its own source of voltage by
proximity, but something funny happens.
The primary does not gain amperage, instead the amperage gain is passed to the
secondary, with the net effect that four to five times more voltage and amperage
will be found on that secondary vs the primary, even though they are of equal LC
values. This same effect is noted with dual loadings of an inductive source via
opposing poles being loaded by a secondary inductor, or essentially placing two
at not merely one inductor atop the source pole to be harnessed. This results in
the middle coil being a carrier to the end coil, whereby the middle coil's
current is reduced, and the end coils current increased: at the expense of the
power input going up instead of down, as it intially does with the addition of
the first inductor as the inductive load.

In any case with all of these manipulations, when the source of voltage goes up
according to its load, that increase is also accompanied by an increase of its
component individual voltage rises that constitute that interphasal voltage
vector, and the appropriate phase angles can be calculated. Because of this the
idea of a load powering its own source is held invalid, because the phase angle
drawings will still be two dimensional for each examined case between only two
and not three points in time; where if we examine three points in time we may
find that representation does demand three dimensions to show the action. But if
we can show this same phenomenon with only two points in time, the evidence
becomes more conclusive that some form of time distortion is needed to explain
the results.

To do this we need a demonstration whereby a measurement of just TWO voltages in
time sourced by resonant sources of voltage rise can be compared as an
interphasal voltage reading WHEREBY that voltage reading will be clearly in
EXCESS to the sum of its components, or what is termed "OVER 180 DEGREES IN
TIME"

This demonstration is now made possible showing this increase to be 25% greater
then the sum of its components. The interphasal aspect of connections is instead
made inductively by using pancake coil secondaries placed in series over the 666
systems top pole facings covering two phases magnetic fields. More information
regarding secondary actions is gleaned from scopings made with and without added
capacity in the secondary circuit. When we attempt to answer the question of how
more voltage can exist between measured points of reference; WE MUST CONCLUDE
THEN THAT THIS THIRD EXTRA VOLTAGE SOURCE BEYOND THE ACTUAL LINE CONNECTIONS
MUST BE COMING THROUGH THE AIR, AND THAT THE SECONDARY AGAIN APPEARS TO BE
POWERING ITS OWN SOURCE OF VOLTAGE, AND THE IDEA INITIALLY SWEPT UNDER THE RUG
SO TO SPEAK, MAY ACTUALLY BE VALID, OTHERWISE HOW CAN WE EXPLAIN THE APPEARANCE
OF THIS EXTRA VOLTAGE?

Dual seriesed pancake secondaries over dual top magnetic poles of the 666
pancake system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EbZGB7QNrM

Sincerely
Harvey D Norris

This explanation in itself may be invalid. In the ending tests on the video the
secondary was made open circuit, and the input side of affairs was shown. All of
the input sides amperage and voltage readings increased, and it was still noted
that that some~ 12.4 volts is read between component sums totalling only ~ 10.7
volts. As noted in video, I don't understand that reading if it is that
secondary amperage circulation that in itself enables that extra voltage to
appear on phases(2-3)V(i) relative voltage differences. If this occurs without
the secondary amperage circulation, that implies the action is made from the
source itself, not just its interaction with that secondary... This of course
throws a wrench into the machine attempting to establish reasoning in the
kingdom. Perhaps Anarchy is afoot. Two steps backward, one step forward, as
Lenin says... Better to just submit the video to other groups with no
explanation for now. When I figure out what is going on, will post another idea
on the subject, or make corrections to said speculations...
HDN/ the buck stops here.

In this example;
Pendulum Waves
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkdfJ9PkRQ
Fifteen uncoupled simple pendulums of monotonically increasing lengths dance
together to produce visual traveling waves, standing waves, beating, and
(seemingly) random motion.
The period of one complete cycle of the dance is 60 seconds. The length of the
longest pendulum has been adjusted so that it executes 51 oscillations in this
60 second period. The length of each successive shorter pendulum is carefully
adjusted so that it executes one additional oscillation in this period. Thus,
the 15th pendulum (shortest) undergoes 65 oscillations.
HDN/comment; We then conclude that two relative frequencies of 51
oscillations/min and 65cycles/ min are compared. 65-51=14. What we see at any
cross section of time is all 15 frequencies simultaneously.
During the start of the pendulum motions the positions in space of all cycles is
identical, but later on after many oscillations the periods of all the cycles
together is once again in synchrony in space. The question posed here is to
fathom how this "time constant of periodocity" is formed.

It would seem that missing information is present for the examination, and we
need to know the ratios of the applied frequency difference. 65/51= 1.2745

We know and select the lower frequency as the standard for repetition. It's time
period for a cycle is established by its input frequency. As an easy quess for
this situation as a guideline estimate of what should be expected by ratios, the
higher frequency is roughly 5/4ths of the lower, so after 5 cycles of the higher
frequency, the four cycles should have fallen back to the identical position at
start time as shown in the video. But obviously here the situation is more
complicated then that because we are looking for the synchchronious point in
time of 15 oscillations, and not merely 5.

Should it not be true that after 65 oscillations of the slower frequency of 51
hz, those positions in space are synchronious again? This would seem to be
obvious. Thus the multiplication of the time cycle of the lower frequency by the
number of cycles made by the higher interacting frequency yields the period of
recurring reprodicity.
hdn

Our apparatus was built from a design published by Richard Berg [Am J Phys
59(2), 186-187 (1991)] at the University of Maryland. The particular apparatus
shown here was built by our own Nils Sorensen.

Like us on Facebook! http://www.facebook.com/NatSciDemos

Video courtesy of Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture Demonstrations, © 2010
President and Fellows of Harvard College

This began with the 747 episode.(Yesterday) The twelve pack of Gennesee was
$7.47 at the store so the number was played in the 3 pick Ohio State Lottery.
Today it paid $83.50 for 3box at the store and a little speaker came on to
announce I was a WINNER, FOR A 50 CENT TICKET.

This of course sent me on some studies about reprodicity of certain numbers
coming in over longer time periods , particularly that of 666. The distribution
of effects seems odd. Will continue these studies.
HDN

hello, http://branje.99k.org/index118tww--.php?pyforum=yyosu

Hello all,

VNN... for all the news you'll never get on CNN

Join Aurora Light and a Panel of Experts Every Sunday Evening "LIVE"
starting at 6:00PM PT (9:00PM ET). 3 hours of talk radio like nowhere else!

The 1st Hour - Aurora Light, Doctor Whodini and Michael Ellegion talk
about current events.

The 2nd Hour - Doctor Whodini and Aurora Light's guest will be the
inventor of the Iranian saucer project, Mehran Keshe. We'll accept
callers questions with our guest during this hour.

The 3rd Hour - Michael Ellegion will be providing insight from a Cosmic
Perspective and serve callers with "Cosmic Hors D'oeuvres" - short
Telepathic Messages from the Spiritual Hierarchy.

To listen LIVE, please visit:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/radionsearch/2011/10/24/new-host-on-sunday-nights

Or, go to: http://VortexNetworkNews.com

Bill

--

William S. Alek, Chief Director, President PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436 Phoenix, AZ 85028 PHONE: 602-626-8115
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

Hello all,

4-hours of radio like nowhere else have been uploaded to the VNN website:
http://VortexNetworkNews.com

My special guest on the 2nd hour of Radio Nsearch Blog Talk Radio
program was the inventor of the Iranian saucer project, Mehran Keshe.
He'll be demonstrated this amazing technology in Europe on November 26th!

On the KFNX show, Aurora, Michael and I talked about some shocking
current events occurring in the US.

Enjoy!

Bill

--
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436 Phoenix, AZ 85028 PHONE: 602-626-8115
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

Research neglected as of late. As everyone says; yeah, but what can you do with
it?

What can you do with it? Well it would seem that since I am the owner of the
knowledge gained by the enquiree, what I can do with it is put it on a shelf for
further reference in the future. This is what I do with garden produce, where
now I have made 20 quarts of spicy pickled green tomatoes, and now another 20-30
quarts of late season spicy peppers awaits. The year has been a good harvest.

Now I remember it was a year ago that the discovery of the wireless tesla coil
first commenced and announced on halloween. And on that sunny day I opened my
garage door with posters showing the history of my inventions/ and lo and
behold, not a single folk would let there children in to collect candy.
Uploaded by harvich on Dec 14, 2010
Discovery of the Wireless Tesla Coil
http://youtu.be/ahGOsXb8fG0
http://youtu.be/2oA-nEZZ07k after corrections made to power source...
http://youtu.be/vnQL5JMQRFw

Uploaded by harvich on Dec 31, 2010

2011 Wireless Tesla Coil Demo from 465 hz 3 phase car alternator inputs,395
views

Progression of the invention thru embodiments...
Now is one year later...
I should do reenactment videos of the principles involved, time will tell. This
is what I mean by putting things on the shelf, they are stored for later
reference.
HDN

Two more video mistakes followed;

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> Research neglected as of late. As everyone says; yeah, but what can you do
with it?
>
> What can you do with it? Well it would seem that since I am the owner of the
knowledge gained by the enquiree, what I can do with it is put it on a shelf for
further reference in the future. This is what I do with garden produce, where
now I have made 20 quarts of spicy pickled green tomatoes, and now another 20-30
quarts of late season spicy peppers awaits. The year has been a good harvest.
>
> Now I remember it was a year ago that the discovery of the wireless tesla coil
first commenced and announced on halloween. And on that sunny day I opened my
garage door with posters showing the history of my inventions/ and lo and
behold, not a single folk would let there children in to collect candy.
> Uploaded by harvich on Dec 14, 2010
> Discovery of the Wireless Tesla Coil
> http://youtu.be/ahGOsXb8fG0
> http://youtu.be/2oA-nEZZ07k after corrections made to power source...
> http://youtu.be/vnQL5JMQRFw
>
> Uploaded by harvich on Dec 31, 2010
>
> 2011 Wireless Tesla Coil Demo from 465 hz 3 phase car alternator inputs,395
views
http://youtu.be/qUdRQ2_ItM4
> Progression of the invention thru embodiments...
> Now is one year later...
> I should do reenactment videos of the principles involved, time will tell.
This is what I mean by putting things on the shelf, they are stored for later
reference.
> HDN
>
> Two more video mistakes followed;
>

Here the methods of voltage rise can be directly compared between source
resonant frequency transformations, and the more familiar ferromagnetic
transformer ones. Bear in mind that I have already discovered this phenomenon of
ferromagnetic resonance years ago, and to simply state the uniqueness of the
phenomenon, it was shown that the ordinary reasoning to be applied to the case
was in fact probably incorrect, since better results were obtained when tests
were made with the applied capacity to be charged and discharged with an
intervening ferromagnetic step up transformer placed between the stator voltage
source and its ending capacitive load, now stepped up in voltage application via
the middle agent of the transformer.

To start from the beginning of explanations here to make the understanding;
every source of emf has a short value of amperage that can be obtained from the
circuit, and the open circuit voltage present before that short amperage
measurement is taken for these measurements of values. Obviously the short
measurement will entirely degrade and reduce its voltage source, but a voltage
measurement of the source while the short is put in place from those outputs,
itself reveals the R(int) value of the source of emf, particularly true here
where all the power input is being obtained through the air via virtue of tuned
resonant circuits, where this extension itself leads to further seeming
contradictions of nature. Many years ago I tuned a circuit whereby its source of
emf obtained from resonant induction from a very large coil would not light a
neon tube, but once it was raised from its source, away from the more powerful
influence, it would light the tube. Of course freedom of vibrations also enters
the picture here as the ideal example shown with the tesla coil, where over
damping hinders the second vibration.

To understand the ulterior motives here, I have not made a single video showing
what I initially discovered. From memory of records(3 yrs ago) I think I
obtained 80% more current from the source than what the source would deliver on
short value. And the voltage ratios of the step up transformer did not obey
normal values; they exceeded them.
Since the direct line connection of large capacitive values  to the source of
emf would be quite large to achieve such an effect, it was concluded that the
desired effect was better accomplished through the use of a somewhat small
capacity made to appear as that large capacity by the associated larger amperage
draw induced by placing the intervening ferromagnetic step up transformer
between the source of emf and its ending capacitive load. It is seen that using
this method, the ending capacitive load can better resonate with the inherent
inductive reactance of the source of emf; then if those reactances were directly
coupled by line connections. In comparisons for those two conditions we then
conclude that the intervening transformer must be acting in a manner of
ferromagnetic resonance, where all former tests of the idea have failed. An iron
inductor will not resonate in normal terms, but it may be useful as an
intermediary.

Will stop for now, but to say the inside story first. Only two of three areas
are used for output. These seems to provide 110 Vac for measurements of loads
from the alternator running with unenergized field. I will elucidate my ideas
ongoing with the exposition. I seem to recognize the purpose of the 666 pancake
system. It changes three actions separate in time into three actions
synchronious in time. Thus on the model to be shown, only two of those three
synchronious actions in time will be harnessed. I do not yet have the parts made
for the third harness. Each step must be analysed. It is these steps themselves
that reveal whether one method is better then another, and thus the scales of
balance can be compared for each addition.
HDN

Hello all,

VNN latest show is now uploaded to:
http://VortexNetworkNews.com

Included are two hours talking about Thane Heins suppressed overunity
technology, The Infinity Generator.

Enjoy!

Bill

--
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ 85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

I had formerly noted;
"I seem to recognize the purpose of the 666 pancake
system. It changes three actions separate in time into three actions
synchronious in time. Thus on the model to be shown, only two of those three
synchronious actions in time will be harnessed. I do not yet have the parts made
for the third harness."
The thrid harness was the third extra secondary to be added in series.
If one will recall I had formerly shown by scopings that a magnetic compression
occurs on all three columns whereby each columns magnetic fields consisting of
polar exits will be a strong field on one side, and a much weaker field on its
opposite polar exit. Two of these strong fields exist on one side containing
three polar exits and the remaining strong field is on the opposite side of the
assembly, on the unused remaining phase 3. All of these stronger polar areas are
then surrounded by 4 layer pancake spirals so that now this three seriesed
segment secondary is identical in wire volume to all three phases themselves.

If it were true that all these voltages on each of the secondaries were in
phase, we might expect that testing each coil itself for amperage delivery upon
short should produce more amperage in the chain when placed in the series? In
any case the three secondaries in series produced more amperage then just two of
them in series.

Now from here that secondary itself can be given a capacity in parallel to allow
amperage circulation between the secondary L and C values, and thus to also
allow the source phase currents to change in accordance with that fact. Then a
40/1 step up transformer is placed as a parallel load on that secondary air core
LC loop. A video showing these effects will be noted.
HDN

Three Seriesed Air Core Secondaries made on 666 pancake system. Ferromagnetic
40/1 step up transformer added as load.
http://youtu.be/cNH1TeXUXPA

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
>
> I had formerly noted;
> "I seem to recognize the purpose of the 666 pancake
> system. It changes three actions separate in time into three actions
> synchronious in time. Thus on the model to be shown, only two of those three
synchronious actions in time will be harnessed. I do not yet have the parts made
for the third harness."
> The thrid harness was the third extra secondary to be added in series.
> If one will recall I had formerly shown by scopings that a magnetic
compression occurs on all three columns whereby each columns magnetic fields
consisting of polar exits will be a strong field on one side, and a much weaker
field on its opposite polar exit. Two of these strong fields exist on one side
containing three polar exits and the remaining strong field is on the opposite
side of the assembly, on the unused remaining phase 3. All of these stronger
polar areas are then surrounded by 4 layer pancake spirals so that now this
three seriesed segment secondary is identical in wire volume to all three phases
themselves.
>
> If it were true that all these voltages on each of the secondaries were in
phase, we might expect that testing each coil itself for amperage delivery upon
short should produce more amperage in the chain when placed in the series? In
any case the three secondaries in series produced more amperage then just two of
them in series.
>
> Now from here that secondary itself can be given a capacity in parallel to
allow amperage circulation between the secondary L and C values, and thus to
also allow the source phase currents to change in accordance with that fact.
Then a 40/1 step up transformer is placed as a parallel load on that secondary
air core LC loop. A video showing these effects will be noted.
> HDN
>

As I have said before, it is assumed that identical circuit conditions should
produce identical results each time. For a number of days I was studying the 666
pancake circuit, whereby one of the three stator delivery wires had become
disconnected, and was showing zero current input, and again finally discovered
this fact and corrected it. But now the results of the machine seem completely
different. Now the open circuit condition yields stable one third amp readings,
which I do not recall as to former tests of this same circuit whether that held
true.

So essentially I maintain that the same three phase rotational circuit may not
just deliver one predicted effect, but several variations. This is on the border
of heresy, so underlying reasons for each differing action need to be sought.

The first distinction that needs to be made is that ordinary three phase
machines achieve a reversal of phase rotation by the mere switching of two of
the three input wires. For a three phase motor those two different possibilities
achieve rotation either in one direction or the other; so we conclude that from
the total amount of wiring combinations; half will go one way and vice versa.

But in the 666 machine each phase is made as seriesed segments circling each
other as three concentric spirals; the legendary three armed swastica; whereby
here the effects of phase rotation become convoluted; and we find that it can
operate in a somewhat correct manner in one direction, but when the phase
rotation is reversed by input wire reversals; TWO AND NOT MERELY ONE OPPOSITE
CONDITIONS RESULTS.

This fact is shown by measurements of stator lines; whereby the meter showing
the weaker amperage can be changed to any of three corners, however only one of
these three corners for the weaker amperage to manifest itself delivers the
desired results on the outputs. In any case I am not amused that former videos
showing different effects can now appear differently, when the only mistake
appears to be a disconnected stator line that was then reconnected. I do recall
that in former videos, only phase 2 had a strong voltage, and 1 and 3 were
reduced. Now these appear to be more equal. Many mistakes in progression are now
looked at to try and understand the underlying differences caused in each
situation, where it takes a detective to sort out all these differing
observations, hence for now I am full of bunk...
HDN

Hello all,

VNN will be broadcasting LIVE on Blog Talk Radio this evening! The show
starts at 6PM PT (9PM ET) and you can listen at a number of websites:
http://BlogTalkRadio.com/RadioNsearch
http://VortexNetworkNews.com
http://www.latenightinthemidlands.com
http://www.project.nsearch.com

Our show is sponsored by RadioNSearch!

Bill

--
William S. Alek, Chief Director, President
PROGRESSIVE TECH CENTER, INC.
10645 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste C200-436
Phoenix, AZ 85028
PHONE: 602-626-8115
URL: http://progressivetechcenter.org/

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111107083409AAH4mkM
Can three phases of 120 degree AC be combined in series to yield the sum of
their input voltages?
     If a full wave rectification is placed across three phases each reading 1 A
rms, at the peak of any three AC signals will be 1.4 A, and at that moment in
time the remaining phases will be delivering half of this value, or .7A. The
combination of these currents for rectification to a common load would then be
2.8A,not counting the diode losses. The amperages existing on the input
alternating currents would have been sequentially added for DC application to a
common load. Would it then be possible to somehow "sequentially add" three one
volt signals from a three phase alternator, to make for a 2.8 volt input
application to a high voltage transformer, where the voltages from each phase
can be sequentially added together for application to a common load?
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/

As noted some mistakes of assumption have been made here. But the last video
suddenly makes sense to me now that I realize something. In that video I had
assumed that the third seriesed secondary coil placed underneath the column
would be a coil facing phase 3, thus I had placed a red checker there. In
reality that should be phase 1, so now seriesed coils are present on BOTH poles
of phase 1. Whenever a inductive load is coupled to a resonance, it degrades
that phases Q factor, and this is why phase 1 sees little to no voltage rise.
HDN

Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/


--- On Wed, 11/9/11, Harry Veeder <hveeder000@...> wrote:

> From: Harry Veeder <hveeder000@...>
> Subject: [Vo]:200 ft long engineered electrical arcs
> To: vortex-l@...
> Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2011, 9:45 PM
> High-voltage engineers create nearly
> 200-foot-long electrical arcs
> using less energy than before.
> http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-extra-long-electrical-arcs-energy.html
>
> I wonder if they looked for neutrons from the exploding
> wires.
> Harry
>
>

At first this effect was assumed to be a scoping anomaly, however analysis of
what should occur when the system is made to transfer energy to a secondary
assembly shows by thought experiment to be the actual effect seen by scopings.
This is an important development. It is now seen that the time period for one
complete revolution of the extra rotating magnetic field component made by lenz
law may be determined by scoping method. In a nutshell what we see scoping wise
of the received signal on identical polar secondaries placed in series over
certain poles is a signal where the frequency is seemingly changing back and
forth from a smaller and larger no. of cycles per second; with the net effect
that the waveform viewed on the scope appears to move rapidly horizontally back
and forth on the beam sweep itself, hence the term;"vibration of the time
domain". Now when even another high value 2.4 H inductor is placed on an
untapped polar area, this vibration of the time domain ceases, but in the
conversion, both the sender and receiver of those vibrations now display that
effect as a vertical scoping amplitude vibration variation. By turning the sweep
period to a longer time period the effect of this "amplitude modulation" can be
plainly seen, and more importantly its predicted assymmetry may be observed
whereby a longer time period exists when the extra rotating lenz law voltage is
aiding the line voltage, vs the time period when it is opposing it.
On the observing of these effects one of the scopes used for dual channnel
observations actually interpreted its input information incorrectly, whereby
that input could be observed to change frequencies on the basis of harmonics.
That scope again blew its fuse, where I have already replaced that fuse with
another fuse from another scope. I will include those observations in my next
video, where I will explain three different secondary arrangements placed around
the 666 pancake primaries.
HDN