Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
testdrivendevelopment · Test-driven Development
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 19012 - 19041 of 28238   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
19012
... Sorry for jumping in into the middle of the discussion, but wouldn't it be simpler to have a test called CustomersAreInOrderByName with a single assert? //...
Johan Nilsson
judoka1981
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
7:11 am
19013
After all this wonderful tech/philosophical discussion it seems to me we should start calling it NUnitHeavy. ;-) John D....
Donaldson, John (GEO)
geo_johnfr
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
7:19 am
19014
Hi, I have written a small article about MVP on .NET 2.0, that uses databinding and includes the source code (with the NUnit tests) at: ...
Dan Bunea
danbunea
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
7:38 am
19015
... I find myself writing methods like assertInstanceOf and assertIsoModels which will, when the underlying assertion is false, produce decent diagnostic...
Chris Dollin
electrik_hed...
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
7:45 am
19016
Hi, We have some experience with database dependent automated tests in .NET. The way we do it, is somehow like: 1) reset database to a preknown state 2\...
Dan Bunea
danbunea
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
8:02 am
19017
I think it looks better with the comment as the first parameter, but I usually don't use comments. It's easier to use smaller tests with better names. -- ...
Thomas Eyde
thomas_eyde
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
8:15 am
19018
Hello Brad, thank you for the observation. On Friday, September 1, ... I thought I had just said "We should make a Result object, and add one method to Assert...
Ron Jeffries
ronaldejeffries
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
9:15 am
19019
Hello Johan, thank you for the email quoted here. On Friday, ... It might. I'm struggling with why we'd want the things being talked about here. Is that...
Ron Jeffries
ronaldejeffries
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
9:27 am
19020
Hi Ron, ... Well, its slightly different. Most people seem to have implemented constraints with a boolean and a string operation. You call the boolean...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
11:20 am
19021
... I'd forgotten about the implicit operators. I tried one to convert int to Constraint. It was fine with Assert.That(7), but it didn't induce the types on...
William Wake
wwake2
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
1:19 pm
19022
Hello Charlie, thanks for the contribution quoted here. On Friday, ... Yes. I have some vague concern about the order of execution. I'm mumbling something...
Ron Jeffries
ronaldejeffries
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
3:50 pm
19023
Hi Bill, ... Yes, they only work when the type of an argument is required to be converted, not for types in general expressions that already have a reasonable...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
4:15 pm
19024
Hi Ron, ... Yes, that definitely comes up if you would prefer not to have the arguments evaluated first, as in the hypothetical Assert.That( sqrt(-2), Throws(...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
4:28 pm
19025
Hi All, Continuing to riff on alternative ways of expressing things in NUnitLite. This time it's Expected Exceptions... http://nunit.com/blogs/?p=38 Charlie...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
10:17 pm
19026
... While the constraints thing is kind of interesting, I think I would rather encourage people to extend their unit-test framework when they need to. For...
Keith Ray
attkeithray
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2006
10:54 pm
19027
Hi Keith, ... To be clear: that's the main motivation for it. By creating a new constraint, you can use the Assert.That with it without changing anything in...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2006
1:14 am
19028
... I sometimes find myself writing little methods like assertCustomersAreInOrderByName() and let the method do it's own asserts, with appropriate messages if...
George Dinwiddie
gdinwiddie
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2006
3:57 am
19029
Hi George, ... Every project should have a little library of domain-specific methods. The difficulty is that you end up duplicating a lot of code - either...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2006
7:36 am
19030
I've been following this discussion with interest. I've always created a TestBase class from which all my test classes for the current project derive. In...
Kenneth LeFebvre
hbg_klefebvre
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2006
5:38 pm
19031
Hi all. Lately I've been doing a lot of graphic processing stuff, and have found myself writing custom assertions to verify various graphic results - things...
avinap77
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2006
8:56 pm
19032
Hi Ken, ... That's a best-practice as far as I'm concerned. ... This sort of thing gets a bit messy, the framework has to make a lot of assumptions about...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
1:01 am
19033
Hi All, I'm looking on advice as to what should be the default behavior when asserting equality of arrays of different shapes. NUnit currently only handles...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
1:51 am
19034
If you were comparing two objects of different types, but each object had the same fields, would you consider them the same? Even if you could figure out a...
Robert Hanson
mvarobert1
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
4:14 am
19035
... I don't think tests should be of "the intention of the code". One main point of tests is to find places where the intention of the spec is not clear, and I...
Moz
list@...
Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
4:15 am
19036
Hello Robert, thanks for your email. On Saturday, September 2, 2006, ... Actually, in a decent duck-typing language, the name sets being equal and the values...
Ron Jeffries
ronaldejeffries
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
4:23 am
19037
... From: "Robert Hanson" <robert.hanson.at.spanlink.com@...> To: "testdrivendevelopment@yahoogroups.com" ...
yahoogroups@...
jhrothjr
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
4:41 am
19038
I don't know of a testing framework for pure graphical testing in .Net. However, we wrote our own C# UI control library so we could effectively test the rich...
Jim Bennett
jtbennett77
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
5:04 am
19039
Hi Robert, ... Clearly they are, which is why I'm asking the question. Heretofore, we have applied the standard equality definition - the one you are saying is...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
5:47 am
19040
Hi John, ... Fortunately, this isn't a choice the framework writer has to make, since we typically ask one object if it believes it's equal to the other. If...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
6:03 am
19041
Hi Moz, ... It's probably because it's late, but I'm not sure from the above which side you're coming down on. If you mean that this is a slippery slope and we...
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2006
6:17 am
Messages 19012 - 19041 of 28238   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help