Further clariification of SOLIDS, LIQUIDS AND GASES can be found at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/the_energy_center/message/12
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/the_energy_center/message/12>
"Before going farther in our study of the phenomenon which we call heat,
it might be well to consider briefly, the three states of matter which
result from the various degrees of heat energy or temperature which the
matter may possess at a given time".

Why is the element silver the pivital point reversal between the release
and absorption of radiant energy in the process of fusion building up
heavier elements in a new star's formation?

"...............when bare nuclei impact other bare nuclei (at energy
levels within the the interior of a star) we see the fusion of the two
may, and frequently does take place. The fusion of two nuclei results in
the formation of a single nucleus which has a mass slightly smaller than
that of the two parts from which it was created. The mass which is lost,
appears as a tremendous burst of radiant energy, most of which
subsequently is converted to heat. We note that this fusion or joining
together of nuclear particles may occur in a number of ways, but in
every case where the resultant nucleus has a mass smaller than the mass
of the atom of silver, large quantities of heat will be released as a a
result of the combination. When the mass of the resultant nucleus is
greater than the the mass of an atom of silver, a large quantity of
energy is absorbed rather than radiated, but this event occurs so
infrequently........" (radius of curvature defined by E=MC2 expanded
definitions http://www.fuel2000.net <http://www.fuel2000.net> )

Contemporary Theory http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html
<http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html> : When a star is formed, it
initially consists of hydrogen and helium created in the Big Bang, the
process that created our universe. Hydrogen isotopes collide in a star
and fuse forming a helium nucleus. Later, the helium nuclei collide and
form heavier elements. Fusion is a nuclear reaction in which nuclei
combine to form a heavier nucleus. It is the basic reaction which drives
the Sun. Lighter elements fuse and form heavier elements. These
reactions continue until the nuclei reach iron (around mass sixty), the
nucleus with the most binding energy. When a nucleus reaches mass sixty,
no more fusion occurs in a star because it is energetically unfavorable
to produce higher masses. Once a star has converted a large fraction of
its core's mass to iron, it has almost reached the end of its life.
The fusion chain cannot continue so its fuel is reduced. Some stars keep
shrinking until they become a cooling ember made up of iron. However, if
a star is sufficiently massive, a tremendous, violent, brilliant
explosion can happen. A star will suddenly expand and produce, in a very
short time, more energy than our Sun will produce in a lifetime. When
this happens, we say that a star has become a supernova. While a
star is in the supernova phase, many important reactions occur. The
nuclei are accelerated to much higher velocities than can occur in a
fusing star. With the added energy caused by their speed, nuclei can
fuse and produce elements higher in mass than iron. The extra energy in
the explosion is necessary to over come the energy barrier of a higher
mass element. Elements such as lead, gold, and silver found on Earth
were once the debris of a supernova explosion. The element iron that we
find all through the Earth and in its center is directly derived from
both super novae and dead stars.

Equalizer
Foundational trouble with physics - Lee Smolin "The Trouble With
Physics" - causes the 'standard model' to idle and idle and idle since
Tesla and the 'Bell experiment". Stagnation bodes an ill wind to
evolution, sustainability, and survival as "cycles of humiliation
(through dumbing us down)" precipitate the historical rise and fall
accelerating toward us in a more spectacular event than the legends and
myths of 'Atlantis and Lemuria". Energy from Corn sounds a wee bit
kindergardenish and senile for the twenty first century.
Messages In This Digest (1 Message) 1. Molecular Structure
Part 10
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlnlabs/message/37980;_ylc=X3oDMTJyOWh0dm\
U4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEzNzg3ODgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDgzMjY5BG1zZ0lkAz\
M3OTgwBHNlYwNkbXNnBHNsawN2bXNnBHN0aW1lAzExOTE2NjA5NzA-> Posted by:
"walt holcomb" waltho2001@yahoo.com
<mailto:waltho2001@yahoo.com?Subject=
Re%3AMolecular%20Structure%20%20%20%20%20Part%2010> waltho2001
<http://profiles.yahoo.com/waltho2001> Wed Oct 3, 2007 6:42 am (PST)
Molecular Structure Part 10 3 Oct 07

Forget the nucleus and those electrons, the spin, the
parity and think of a structure of white and black
particles. The free electron being the simplest, 6wp
and one bp, cluster.

The melting point defines the interface between a
solid and a liquid, where the boiling point that
between liquid and gas.

In the periodic table of the elements we refer to the
spherical clusters as the "noble gases". Spheres
cannot share a large number of wp between them,
explaining why less energy is require in separating
them.

Name density melting point boiling point
Helium 0.179gm/cm3 -272oC -269oC
Neon 0.901 -249 -246
Argon 1.784 -189 -186
Krypton 3.740 -157 -153
Xenon 5.897 -112 -108
Radon 9.730 - 71 - 62

Here the lighter the element the freer it is. The
larger the R, the less energy required.

The noble gases are on the right side of the table.
The elements on the left side of the table are the
"Alkali Metals". We might expect to find an entirely
different type cluster (flatter, cubic possibly where
a large number of wp can be shared between them, thus
requiring a higher energy state for separation)
configuration with different characteristics (omitting
hydrogen) we have:

Name density melting point boiling point
Lithium 0.530gm/cm3 180oC 1347oC
Sodium 0.971 98 553
Potassium 0.862 64 774
Rubidium 1.532 39 688
Cesium 1.873 28 678

Here the more dense the element the easier it is to
separate. Absorption of wp.

By bring the temperature above the melting point of
two minerals the two may fuse into a bimetal. Once
cooled the bimetal will melt at a temperature less
than that of either of the metals alone. The minerals
have assumed a new state with a higher R. So one would
anticipate that the density of the binary alloy to be
less than that of the two ingredients. Check it out.

Yes there is far too much to discuss here, but some
thing for you to dwell upon. How powerful would a
computer model be?
Walt Scottsdale AZ

--- In jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com, walt holcomb <waltho2001@...> wrote:
>
> Energy Part 9 26 Sept. 07
>
> What is energy?
>
> Energy: the capacity to do work.
>
> Work: force through distance.
>
> Force: thank you Sir Isaac; F=ma
>
> So what's the big deal? E=mcc?
>
> First of all c is not a constant but a function of the
> photon field density. m and c are related in the fpt
> by the R factor. The higher the density of the photon
> field, the lower the mass of available particles.
> Nothing travels faster than light, but light is not a
> particle sent from point A to B unless there are no
> intervening photons.
>
> Natural radioactivity (fission) is due to the increase
> in (wp) the R factor (via the sun). When a particle
> splits the resultant mass of the sub-particles is less
> than that of the original particle. The sub-particles
> have attracted more wp and have a higher R factor.
>
> When a critical mass is reached, that is sub-particles
> from the fission of one particle cause the fission of
> other particles. This action results in a suction of
> wp to the extent of causing monitory darkness and
> resulting in a huge ball of fire as the resultant
> particles expand.
>
> Fusion (formation of a heavier particle from
> sub-particles) is not a natural process. It is caused
> by a decrease in WP density (like that caused by a
> critical mass as explained above). Of course the
> fusion best result in forming a stable particle, like
> Helium. The increase in mass from the original
> sub-particles (lower R) feeds the fission reaction.
>
> Fusion may be achieved by the migration of a lighter
> element (high R) into a heavier element (low R) by the
> reduction of the wp density. The reduction in the wp
> density essentially slows (even reverses) the
> condition producing fission. Will two (or more)
> negative poles of strong magnets reduce the wp
> density? Would the resulting material be radioactive?
> How to harness the released energy is another
> consideration.
>
> Would reversing poles of the magnets to establish a
> higher wp density to reduce the half-life of an
> element be advantageous? Consider materials with low
> half-lives.
>
> When wood is burnt is not the resulting CO2 of less
> mass than the wood?
> Potential energy like that of water dammed up.
> The use of air and sun light are what we refer to as
> sources of "free energy".
> If it isn't "free" you have to work for it.
>
> walt holcomb
> Scottsdale AZ
>
>