Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
tmboptical · A place for TMB telescope owners and adm
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 15556 - 15585 of 36598   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
15556
Well, after long absence, I have a chance to watch the Moon this week. My latest craze is to find crater chains on the Moon ... Anyway while meandering around...
ronbee77
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
7:13 am
15557
Dear Ron: It is great to see a new observing report from you. As a "Lunophile," it is doubly good to see an observing report of our too oft neglected nearest ...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
10:19 am
15558
Interesting! The picture does make it look short. A little math suggests that the system must be about, say 8" x 6 f/ratio = 48". Of course if Markus filled ...
Richard Chalfan
rchalfan
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
12:35 pm
15559
Hi All, I currently have a Celestron C14 and I would like to get a TMB152 or TMB175. Could anybody who know these scopes give me his opinion about the ...
manuelmedialdea
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
4:13 pm
15560
... From: "manuelmedialdea" <manuelm@...> To: <tmboptical@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 8:38 AM Subject: [tmboptical] C14 vs TMB152 /...
W. Gondella
missyy9
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
5:41 pm
15561
... Hi Manuel, I have recently bought a TMB152 and the views of the planets are awesome. Crisp, sharp, amazing detail and colour that seems bright and natural....
Ray Byrne
inchmak
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
6:34 pm
15562
If the observing length with extended dew cap is 40.5 inches (1029 mm), then it seems as though the objective must be mounted in the sliding dew shield. The...
tomdemary
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
6:51 pm
15563
... _____________________ But but, Richard. . . . An 8"f6, you would think, would have a 48" fl to which you have to add the focuser and if you use one, the...
domarturo
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
7:46 pm
15564
Manuel, I am in the same circumstances as you are... Josep M....
pepineus
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
7:57 pm
15565
Not that I'm considering doing it, but can you imagine how small a folded TMB175 would be, say in the design of Jim P's folded Astro-Physics 9" refractor? Does...
Mike C
tmb_mike
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
8:24 pm
15566
Hi Gang, Anyone looking to upgrade to a larger size? I am looking for a TMB152. Can't blame a man for trying! Thanks, Thorpe...
hts58@...
hts58
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2004
9:52 pm
15567
Hi Clevis: Enjoyed reading your report. I observed and made a sketch of Comet Bradfield yesterday morning with a pair of tripod-mounted 22x100mm binoculars: ...
ericj
ej1847
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
1:21 am
15568
Hi Group, My wife and I were discussing about the newest designed TMB APO line, that are supposedly coming out this year, and in the near future. I wanted to...
Wm. G. Jones, Jr.
wwmjonjr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
3:31 am
15569
... From: "Wm. G. Jones, Jr." <wmgjjr@...> To: <tmboptical@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 11:16 PM Subject: [tmboptical] 130mm/140mm...
W. Gondella
missyy9
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
11:51 am
15570
Hi Wayne, You're the first person (I have had communicated at the workplace, every where, etc. - even at the White House - Just kidding!) to be annoyed by...
wmgjjr@...
wwmjonjr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
3:46 pm
15571
Dear Wm.: Don't worry, I hear u just fine! :-) Best regards, Norm Rubenstein...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
3:48 pm
15572
... I think you are mistaking the proposed LOMO 130/1100 for a 130mm f/11. It is actually a f/8.5 lens. Harvey...
mrgrytt
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
4:59 pm
15573
Hi William, Since you have been on the TMB and TEC list I've been trying to figure out whether English was your first language! For some reason I thought you...
Ray Byrne
inchmak
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
6:24 pm
15574
In a message dated 5/2/2004 1:00:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, mrgrytt@... writes: I think you are mistaking the proposed LOMO 130/1100 for a 130mm ...
wmgjjr@...
wwmjonjr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
6:29 pm
15575
... 130mm ... Harvey, it's actually a f8.46 lens (8.4615+). The way you wrote it you are dividing first the f by the 11 and then the f by the 8.5 which...
domarturo
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
7:19 pm
15576
... by LOMO ... ___________ So what's the problem, Wm? Just add a slight blue filter when looking at Saturn. Donald...
domarturo
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
7:22 pm
15577
... ____________ Hey Norm! Is it okay to reply to your own messages? <g> Back in the middle ages I sent a lot of Morse Code. That transfers into my writing as...
domarturo
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
7:35 pm
15578
In a message dated 5/2/2004 3:23:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, ... by LOMO ... ___________ So what's the problem, Wm? Just add a slight blue filter when looking...
wmgjjr@...
wwmjonjr
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
7:38 pm
15579
... Like I could stop you, anyway? <BG> ... Listen up, youse guys and gals (Iąm also from Chicago) we are a tolerant bunch, here, and if łThe Donald,˛...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
8:27 pm
15580
... Donald, Believe it or not, I know it is a f/8.46 lens. I just used the reference to the lens (f/8.5) that has been commonly used by Thomas and Markus to...
mrgrytt
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
8:47 pm
15581
... The 130 f/9.x lenses are going to be made by LZOS later this year. I don't know for sure if they are going to be f/9.0 or f/9.2 though. Markus had...
mrgrytt
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
8:56 pm
15582
... From: <wmgjjr@...> To: <tmboptical@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [tmboptical] 130mm/140mm Questions ... Dear Will, ...
W. Gondella
missyy9
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
9:06 pm
15583
... The TMB 152 is actually f/7.8947368 (rounded down to nearest 10 millionth) but at that accuracy, thermal contraction of the cell might be varying the focal...
Mike C
tmb_mike
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
9:12 pm
15584
... Hey, Wayne, you wouldnąt want MY body! Norm ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Norman L. Rubenstein
nlrubenstein
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
9:22 pm
15585
Hi Wm: This is what Markus posted on the AstroMart formus regarding the TMB 140mm f/7: "scope will not come soon, 2 pc first testing lenses coming end of this ...
ericj
ej1847
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2004
9:27 pm
Messages 15556 - 15585 of 36598   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help