... I played a lot with the 29 note scale, and it worked fine. It's nice to have some small intervals to throw in when you want them. It's a serious...
... Did you ever track down what Partch said? Harmonic entropy can obviously be used to prove whatever you like. It also shows that the troughs get narrower...
... So why is 29 notes of schismic good, and 27 notes of ennealimmal bad? I think both temperaments are so strong they should be included. Ennealimmal still...
... Not me, for the most part. I think the non-keyboard composer is simply being ignored in these discussions, and I think I'll stand up for him. ... and I ......
... 29 notes of schismic happens to fit a 7+5 keyboard well. Ennealimmal may well work, although it is more complex. Shouldn't it be 36 notes for the first...
... Observation One: The extent and intensity of the influence of a magnet is in inverse proportion to its ratio to 1. "To be taken in conjunction with the...
... Hmm, that's fairly impenetrable. But it does say "extend" and "inverse proportion". ... So it's only about resolution? ... Oh no, the simple intervals...
... No, just assume octave repetition, find the period (easy) and then the unique generator that is between 0 and 1/2 period. ... What do you have in mind?...
... has ... accurately, ... Can't find my copy of Genesis! ... It ... limit, so ... irrelevant. Yes, this is what Partch and the mathematics that underlies...
... going ... (I'm ... I'm using your formula from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/message/8806 but instead of "max", I'm using "sum" . . ....
... up ... And the new-keyboard composer! ... a ... 7, ... Really? Can you elaborate? Do you still get an infinite number of images of each ratio, times 9/3^2,...
... You mean log(n/d)/log(n*d) where n:d is the comma that vanishes. I prefer these scalings complexity = lg2(n*d) error = comma_size_in_cents / complexity =...
... Um, it says "extent"... :) ... The observations are given in a discussion of chord progressions. Does this mean you don't have a copy of _Genesis_? Wait,...
... I didn't follow that. Maybe you could explain how it explains how someone who sees no relation between error and complexity could possibly be interested...