Jct: A sick guy got the court to declare the law dead.
Now healthy people can claim it`s dead for them too.
Nothing to do with health any more!
If cultivation and possession prohibitions are no longer valid,
you can`t traffick in something not illegal.

--- On Thu, 7/10/08, Richard <marcus.acb@...> wrote:

From: Richard <marcus.acb@...>
Subject: RE: Looking for help
To: johnturmel@...
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2008, 3:25 PM








Only rush I’m looking at is what to do come Aug. 20 when we have to plead. We
already got one continuance from last month, so I doubt they’re going to allow
another. Other than that, I’m willing to make this last as long as I need to.
 
How does the Krieger argument affect S. 6(1) keeping in mind also, they are
using sections 21 and 22 of c.c. to draw the line to 7.(1) and 5.(1).  Note that
they did not bother with 4.(1), guess I can’t possess vicariously through any
persons who bought and grew out any seeds. However, I do believe that a problem
exists with 5.(1) since punishment is based on Schedule VII and VIII and it does
not indicate cannabis seeds. One more thing, doesn’t Krieger argument base
itself around med use? If our operation was strictly the sale of seeds, how then
can it be relevant?
 
Thanks for all your help and time on this matter.  I’ll check out the Krieger
argument as well as Pierre Drouin.
 
 
Sincerely,
Richard
 

From: John Turmel [mailto:johnturmel@...]
Sent: July-10-08 10:58 AM
To: richard@...
Cc: MedPot; Medpot-Discuss
Subject: RE: Looking for help
 




Jct: Argue the possession and cultivation prohibitions remain invalidated by
Parker and Krieger until Parliament, not the Hitzig judges, bring new
legislation. As Judge Chen said: once it's invalidated, it can't be resuscitated
like the Hitzig judges say they did.
Just use the Supreme Court of Canada online note proving that S.7(1) Krieger
invalidation remains in effect.
Once you challenge the law with Krieger, the Crowns have a much greater interest
in calling the whole thing off. We've won so many cases because they're scared
of the Supreme Court Krieger argument, I can`t even remember them all.
Of course, it means going on offence for a couple of years before you then go on
defence.
Check out Pierre Drouin who went to the top and is not back at the bottom.
Are you in any rush
 
I cross posting this to medpot-discuss where those who have won those cases
are subscribed. Join and ask them what to do.

--- On Thu, 7/10/08, Richard <marcus.acb@...> wrote:

From: Richard <marcus.acb@...>
Subject: RE: Looking for help
To: johnturmel@...
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2008, 7:06 AM


Dear John,
                It’s a pleasure and honour to for me to make contact with you. 
I’ve read about some of the battles you have fought and I admire your passion
and conviction in matters dealing with the ongoing crime against people better
known as the “war on drugs”. 
                Let me first introduce myself. I’m a family man married and with
a 5 year old child.  My love for my family outweighs anything in life and I
would do anything to protect them. I believe everyone on this planet has equal
rights, and no man or woman should be a slave to another, be it an individual or
corporation.
                In January of 2006, I along with my wife, sister, brother in-law
and few people I consider friends (8 people in all including myself) were
arrested and charged under 5.1, 6.1 and 7.1 of the CDSA.  If you do a search on
Richard Hratch Baghdadlian, you will see some of the embellished media reports.
You may have already heard about this case back in 2006 called Operation
Couriel.  Even Marc Emery jumped on this report and made a few false statements,
but I don’t hold that against him as he was fed a great deal of lies by others
looking forward to my demise.
                To give you a brief outline into the current situation, our next
court date is in August, we will all have to enter a plea.  I’ve attempted to
discuss this with the prosecutor to come close to a fair deal, but his terms are
completely off as he wishes to make an example and set a new precedence to
pursue others who conduct the sale of seeds.
                My lawyer has been ineffective at both ends, either for putting
together any type of defence or for reaching a fair deal for a plea bargain. 
The Crown is demanding I serve 6 years and pay 2 million in fines (5 years if
unable to pay). He is also charging my wife and demanding 2 years from her, even
though she never worked for me nor had anything to do with the company.
                I feel a great deal of intimidation is coercion is being used
here to strike a deal favourable to the crown since he is aware the on precedent
for sentencing in the past was the Hunter case which was a $200 fine and
recently the case of Kostantin who received 30 days.
                Anyway, I’m at the point I feel I have not been given any fair
options as I’m warned that by standing up for my rights, I will be punished even
harder.  If you can offer any advice on this matter for me it would be greatly
appreciated. Thank you for your time.
 
Sincerely,
Richard
 
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]