Michael Stevens wrote:
> To me it look like the CVS HEAD is still broken. Karl's vector_temporary
> deduction seems only to be half implemented. Toon is it possible that when
> you committed the merged uBLAS_pure plus patches you missed something out?
Could you be more specific. I don't see what is broken actually? I ran
the regression tests succesfully and we are using it in other internal
projects?
BTW: pay attention to mail to ublas@... instead of the old
yahoogroups ml!