Toegegeven, nogal off-topic...
Moraal: gordel altijd omhouden.
---------------
Subject: Update: 22 hurt after jet hits turbulence
*** Update: 22 hurt after jet hits turbulence
HONOLULU (AP) - A Continental Airlines flight from Tokyo to Honolulu
hit severe turbulence Wednesday, injuring 18 passengers and four
flight attendants. The injuries were mostly bumps and bruises, said
an airline spokeswoman. Thirteen passengers were treated at The
Queen's Medical Center and released. The flight attendants were
treated at another hospital for contusions and strains. Flight 910
landed safely at the Honolulu airport about three hours after hitting
turbulence at 33,000 feet, said Marilyn Kali of the state
Transportation Department. The plane was carrying 330 passengers, 15
flight attendants and three pilots. Most of the injured passengers
were sitting in the back of the plane. See
http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2558124036-df0
---------------
Frits Westra -- fwestra@...
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2 - Registered
Calendar Of Events - Courtesy of JPL Space Calendar
Jan 23 2nd Test Flight Of The X-38 (V-131)
Jan 23 Asteroid 5131 (1990 BG) Closest Approach To Earth (0.803)
Jan 24 Comet C/1998 M5 (LINEAR) Perihelion (1.747 AU)
Jan 25 Mars Climate Orbiter, Trajectory Correction Maneuver #2 (TCM-2)
Jan 25 5th Anniversary (1994), Clementine Launch (Moon Orbiter)
Jan 25 35th Anniversary (1963), Echo 2 Launch, 1st Joint US-USSR Program
Jan 26 ROCSAT Athena 1 Launch
Jan 27 Mercury Passes 2.2 Degrees From Neptune
Jan 27 Comet Harrington-Abell Perihelion (1.758 AU)
Jan 28 Cassini, Trajectory Correction Maneuver #6 (TCM-6)
Jan 28 Globalstar Soyuz Launch
Jan 28 Asteroid 1991 VB Closest Approach To Earth (1.218 AU)
Jan 29 Galileo, Orbital Trim Maneuver #59 (OTM-59)
Jan 29 10th Anniversary (1989), Phobos 2 Mars Orbit Insertion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frits Westra -- fwestra@...
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2 - Registered
Voor de nieuwsgierigen onder ons: Mijn site, Picard UFO Research
International, heeft een zeer uitgebreid onderdeel waar in nieuws is
opgenomen. Het nieuws wat daar gevonden kan worden heeft vooral betrekking
op zaken met als intressegebied UFOs, Aliens, Astronomie, Archaeologie,
Historie, NASA, etc. Dit onderdeel wordt meestal ten minste 1 keer per week
bijgewerkt (tot voor kort was dat eens per twee dagen).
PUFORI heeft meer! De site bestaat uit bijna 6000 tekst items verspreid
over onderdelen zoals:
1. Nieuws
2. Artikelen (gerangschikt op rubriek)
3. Volledig Online Boeken (15 stuks, waarvan 10 in de boek index en mede
beschikbaar in MS-Word formaat)
4. Onderzoek (Nog niet zo uitgebreid..., bestaat ook uit NASA's Pathfinder
missie en de grootste collectie Phil Schneider documentatie)
5. Landspecifieke Internet onderdelen (Op het ogenblik is alleen Brazilie
aanwezig... in zoal Portugees als Engels)
6. Mailinglists en binnenkort een IRC Chat onderdeel.
Dit is het meerendeel, maar niet alle informatie die er te vinden is, alles
is geindexeerd met een SWISH-E zoekmethode voor makkelijke toegang.
Nieuwsgierig? Bezoek de site op http://www.pufori.org/ (Ik raad iedreen
aan om de "frames" site te gebruiken :-) Alle commentaar is welkom.
Groeten,
Jeroen Wierda
Picard UFO Research International
E-Mail me : JeroenW@...
URL to PUFORI: http://www.pufori.org/
If I do not reply to mail addressed to me within 3 days, plz resend it.
Postal address:
Jeroen Wierda, PO Box 352, 5201 AJ 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
PS: Iemand hier met kennis van ASP en Internet database systemen?
> Subject: "This could be the most dramatic UFO video
> ever!"
Leuk filmpje...maar om nou te zeggen zwaar overtuigend...Nou nee :-))
En waarom willen die getuigen van dit soort filmpjes toch altijd anoniem
blijven...
Greetingzzz,
Andy.
> FROM:
>
>
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dreamworld/5672/index
>
> GO HERE AND DOWNLOAD THE VIDEO FOR YOURSELF. YOU BE
> THE JUDGE!
> -----------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
> ----
>
> "This could be the most dramatic UFO video ever!"
>
> Stills from the Video
>
> On the 26th December 1997, dramatic video footage of
> a UFO was recorded in the area just south of North
> Bay, Ontario, Canada. The video was taken by 2 people
> who were visiting friends over the holiday period.
> They have chosen to remain anonymous, and are known
> only as G and C.
>
> The footage shows a saucer-like object in the
> distance that rapidly approaches the cameraman's
> position and appears to "buzz" a nearby house. The
> audio on the tape is quite muffled but the transcript
> is as follows:
>
> G: "Is it still there?"
>
> C: "...by the trees there..."
>
> G: "I've got it, I got it...yeh"
>
> G: "Wow!"
>
> Static
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
> ----
>
> Preliminary video analysis suggests that it is not a
> hoax. Bartholomew
> McVeigh, a video-analyst from Toronto, and ex-NASA
> employee, states:
>
> "It would be impossible to produce this kind of
> footage on current home computers"
>
> To further add to the claim for authenticity, there
> is an eye-witness testimony of Robert Parker, a local
> farmer:
>
> "We see a lot of strange objects in the skies around
> these parts, especially around that time of year. I
> remember saying to G____ and C____ a couple of days
> beforehand that they wouldn't like it around here,
> not on Boxing Day."
Hallo,
Ik wilde toch meer weten over dat hele "Crash Site Debris"-verhaal, dus
besloot ik een e-mailtje te sturen naar de aanbieders met een, voor mij,
aantal cruciale vragen. Let op het standaard-mailtje dat ik terug kreeg!
Met geen woord heb ik het er namelijk over interesse te hebben in het
AANSCHAFFEN van een stukje UFO... Ook valt mij op dat er practisch geen
enkel door mij gestelde vraag werd beantwoord...[ Misschien had ik toch
moeten DOEN alsof ik WEL wat had willen kopen...after all, het gaat
allemaal om de $$$...toch?...;-) ]
Hieronder mijn mailtje:
> A.U.R.A. wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > With interest I read you web-page of alledged crash debris from > > UFO's.
> > Well now, I'm a UFO-researcher for some years now and of course this
> > set off my curiosity. However it left me with many questions:
> >
> > I wonder how can you proof that this is CSD?
> >
> > Where was it found, belonging to wich crash?
> >
> > Did the material undergo an analysis and if yes, by whom?
> >
> > Oh...I could think of a lot more questions but right now I will only
> > bother you with the above ;-)
> > I hope you don't mind me asking all this, but it just if WHAT you claim
> > is true, this would be the finding of the millenium...
> >
> > With kind regards,
> >
> > Andy Denne
> >
> > Abduction & Ufo Research Association (AURA)
> > Nijmegen, The Netherlands
> > aura@...
> > http://members.tripod.com/~A_U_R_A/index.html
Het Antwoord dat ik kreeg van New Spirit:
New Spirit wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> We no longer have any more material that we are offering for sale.
> Other sellers will be at the Tucson gem shows , at least 3 I believe.
> We are at least 4 times removed from the source, so the exact details
> that you seek are beyond our ability to disclose.
>
> We purchased our supplies over 18 months ago from a trusted long
> time supplier. He supplied the preliminary lab tests plus
> his account of the story behind the material. We were sufficiently
> convinced that the material is what it is.
>
> Both our supplier and we have been in business for a long time
> and neither of us would risk our hard fought business reputations
> if we did not have a root belief that the material is in fact
> real CSD.
>
> There are going to be other web sites that refer to this material.
> One of them is http://www.crashdebris.com
> I don't know if they are active yet , but they claim they
> will be. Maybe you could inquire of them.
>
> Consider this, if every researcher in the world that wanted to
> test this material on their own was given a free specimen soon
> there would be none left for anyone else and it would all be
> consumed in testing.
>
> The fact is that some folks will take the risk to own pieces
> before every little detail is tested and disclosed, and others will
> not take that risk. Each of us must make that personal decision.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Mike McKnight
> New Spirit Jewelers
> Shorewood, Wi.
>
Nou...da's er dus weer een voor de map "JAMMER MAAR HELAAS" ;-)
Groetjes,
Andy Denne
(A.U.R.A.)
Het valt kennelijk allemaal zomaar uit de lucht ;-)
Of....???
Andy Denne
(A.U.R.A.)
van: stig.agermose@...
>
> Source:
>
http://www.wehug.com/crashsitedebris.html
>
> I have corrected the spelling errors only. The use of
> capitals isn't grammatically correct, but seems to be
> part of the style.
>
> Stig
>
> ***
>
> (Alien UFO) crash site debris CSD
> 1947 Missouri Crash Site Debris
>
> ALL Material has been SOLD
>
> This page is for Reference ONLY
>
> We will not be offering any more material as the
> replacement price is too high.
>
> *
>
> You probably haven't heard about this material (CSD)
> before... but you will. It has been introduced at The
> big Tucson show this February ('98). We understand
> that the author of "Love is in the Earth", MELODY,
> and some other large metaphysical companies will be
> offering this material for sale. Before the year is
> out this material will be a "must have". And you saw
> it here first !
>
> This may well be the most exciting UFO news in years,
> and you can own a piece of History ....Read on.......
>
> [Link: Visit this site for more information about
> UFO
> crash sites.]
>
> This is a fantastic story, and while the majority of
> visitors to this page will no doubt remain skeptical
> at best, I will never the less attempt to relate this
> intriguing tale as best I can.
>
> According to a published article by the nationally
> well known author Melody, and released at the 1998
> Tucson gem and mineral show, testing has revealed
> that the green and gray material (CSD) contains
> "Perfect Cristobalite Stars". These "Stars" show up
> in microscopic photos. "Other components include a
> chilled-porous crust, and silvery metallic balls
> (Iron 99.2% Pure); Some of the constituents are:
> Pyroxene with a composition between Hedenbergite and
> Johannesite, Magnesium, and significantly, 15 Rare
> Earth Minerals !"
>
> For pictures of material for sale - scroll down !
>
> Part 1
>
> How we came to know about this special Alien crash
> site debris (CSD)
>
> About a year ago during a routine sales call one of
> our best mineral/meteorite suppliers told us that he
> had met a fellow rockhound at the site in Arizona
> where they were both collecting specimens. As they
> started to chat our vendor told the new fellow about
> how he was into meteorites and had quite a collection
> and sold them as well. The stranger said that he too
> was into meteorites but that he had a come in contact
> with a source of some most amazing material ever and
> wanted to know if our vendor was interested ?
>
> The rest as they say is history. Our friend joined
> into a limited partnership with the source for the
> purpose of testing and distribution.
>
> Being two Aquarians, of course we had to have some
> and invested in a small quantity. Several of our
> local customers/friends also bought pieces, a few of
> which were made into the most unique jewelry in the
> world. All of us (locally) invested in this material
> long before it was tested and confirmed. We believe
> that as the word spreads from Tucson and it begins to
> be promoted that the price of this rare material
> could easily sky rocket to $1000. per gram or more.
>
> We waited and waited for testing results to come in
> and either verify that we did indeed buy a piece of
> history or that we had just bought some foundry slag
> or whatever. The story goes on as samples that were
> presented for testing turned up mysteriously missing,
> and time seemed to go into a slow motion time warp.
>
> Finally results started to trickle in and it looks
> like there is enough evidence to have justified our
> investment after all.
>
> While we were waiting for the lab results to come in
> we took a piece to one of our friends that had a
> psychic gift since childhood and asked him to tell us
> whatever he could about the material. What happened
> was truly amazing.
>
> After a meditation concentrating on the impressions
> of this material, he did what we call "Automatic"
> drawing. It is like what Edgar Cayce did only Cayce
> used someone else to write down what transpired
> during the trance like secessions.
>
> Any way, our friend drew several "frames" of his
> impressions, which captured how this debris came to
> be and what happened. The drawings revealed a fiery
> crash scene showing the general area where the crash
> took place, plus several other "frames" depicting the
> scene and related impressions including what appears
> to be a 40's military base and military vehicles. It
> is absolutely eerie, and we believe that one day this
> will all come out and be well documented by those who
> can do a professional job of investigative
> reporting.
>
> Packets of information are available for $20.00 to
> help offset the cost of copying and mailing. These
> packets include , lab reports, copies of newspaper
> accounts around the time of the crash, verifying that
> the UFO sightings were witnessed by local Missouri
> residents and reporters, cover sheets that tell about
> the material as analyzed so far, and copies of the
> "Automatic" drawings.
>
> Now consider one thing here, any reputable scientific
> lab that has done or will do testing of this material
> will not jeopardize their standing and reputation in
> the scientific community by deliberately labeling
> this material as "Spacecraft Crash Debris".
>
> They will all have to continue there regular business
> and will not want to be called to task for declaring
> this material extraterrestrial alien ship material.
> It just won't happen that way, what you hope for is
> that the materials found in the debris will end up as
> "UNKNOWN" or at least components will fall out of
> limits of materials found on earth in some distinct
> way. This is the case with the small IRON spheres
> that are almost pure Iron, and the GRAY appearing
> areas that have been labeled "UNKNOWN". What else
> would one expect from a main stream scientific lab?
> Remember they are not into UFO's as most don't
> acknowledge their existence at this time, at least
> not openly to the public.
>
> In a nut shell what we know at this time (March '98)
>
> *The crash was not a whole ship, but rather a pod or
> some sort of module that was jettisoned from the main
> craft, thus no BODIES were found.
>
> *The location was possibly in the St. Joe, Missouri
> area.
>
> *The time was in July 1947 about the same time as the
> Roswell incident took place.
>
> *The crash site debris is not natural, not a
> meteorite, and has some components whose properties
> fall out of expected measurements for the same
> material found on Earth either naturally occurring or
> man made. It also has some components that has
> chemical properties of unknown material or atomic
> structure.
>
> *There is a very good reason you have never heard of
> this material or crash. It fell on private property
> in a rural area, and the owners hide and buried the
> material after reading accounts of what was happening
> to the residents of the Roswell incident and the
> Military involvement. They didn't want to go through
> the possible ridicule and turmoil by revealing the
> incident.
>
> *The original people (owners) are now dead and it is
> their son who has recovered the material after all
> these years and is trying to get as wide of
> distribution as possible. Not only to earn money but
> to make it difficult to have another government cover
> up. This is the main reason that specific details of
> location etc. are still and will probably remain a
> mystery. Who would want hundreds or thousands of
> people digging up your property or invading your
> privacy ?
>
> *The testing was done without commenting on the
> nature of the samples being submitted. Just that they
> might be a new mineral find. They were tested at two
> Western Universities and a private chemical testing
> laboratory.
>
> *Extraordinary chemistry analysis includes:
>
> *99.05% Pure Iron spheres evenly distributed
> throughout the material.
>
> *There is an orange-brown material around the spheres
> that is "unknown", thought to be possibly magnesium
> orthoferrosilite.
>
> A similar material was found in a fragment of UFO
> debris
> recovered in Washington D.C. July 1952.
>
> *A gray looking material area within the samples is a
> unknown material with composition that falls between
> Johannesite and Hedenbergite. The material for now is
> called Gellerite after the first scientist to
> seriously study the crash site debris (CSD).
>
> *It contains 220 times the level of Bismuth, 30 times
> the level of Antimony, 11 times the level of Mercury,
> and 8 times the level of Silver normally found in
> average continental crust samples.
>
> The "Black Stuff" SOLD
>
> [Link] This is a peek at the "BLACK Material". It has
> not yet been as thoroughly tested as the green - gray
> material. At least not to the point where we wish to
> market it to the general public. It is here for
> reference only at this time, to let you know that
> there is more to this story to unfold.
>
> What you are looking at here are slices from a long
> "tube like" structure. This material has some very
> unusual thermal dynamic properties as well as an
> unusually high assay content of precious metals. It
> appears to be nothing more than a course black
> graphic looking material, but looks can be deceiving.
> This may eventually prove be the real smoking gun
> surrounding this whole story. Pictured is about 6.5
> grams. The early guess is that this material may well
> have something to do with the propulsion or fuel
> systems of the craft. It is very clear that these
> pieces come from a quite separate component of the
> wreckage than does the green - gray material.
>
> Part II - Own a Piece of History
>
> Small pieces of the CSD for sale
>
> To place an order please email or call toll free
> 1-888-255-1175 between 10 & 6 M/F or 10 & 5 Saturday
> Central time. Please refer to the LOT NUMBER under
> each picture. The smaller pieces are selling quickly,
> call or email as soon as you make up your mind that
> you want a particular pieces. Most pieces are
> polished on one or more sides to bring out the
> pattern.
>
> Click on thumbnail images for expanded view:
>
> Lot #1-1.0b - 1.0 gram piece $100.00 >SOLD< for
> reference only
>
> Lot #3 0.7 grams <SOLD>
>
> Lot #3 0.8 grams $80.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 0.9 grams $90.00 <SOLD>
>
> Lot #3 0.9 grams (b) $90.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.0 grams $100.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.4 grams $140.00 SOLD
>
> lot #3 1.4 grams (b) $140.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.5 grams $150.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.7 grams $170.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.8 grams $180.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #3 1.9 grams $190.00 SOLD
>
> *
>
> Lot # 1-34.9 34.9 grams $2,800.00 SOLD
>
> Lot # 2-12.5 12.5 grams $1,125.00 SOLD
>
> Lot # 2-3.8 3.8 grams $380.00 SOLD
>
> Lot # 2-3.0 3.0 grams $300.00 SOLD
>
> Lot # 2-2.5 2.5 gram piece $250.00 SOLD
>
> Lot #1-2.5a 2.5 gram piece $250.00 SOLD
>
> Lot # 2-2.0 2.0 grams $200.00 SOLD
>
>
> New Spirit Jewelers
> & Crystal Gallery
> 1918 E. Capitol Dr.
> Shorewood, WI.
>
> 532111-414-964-7008
> 1-888-255-1175
> toll free
>
> Please *E-MAIL
> your comments -
> deal directly with
> the owners,
> Diane Vandeveld and
> Mike McKnight
>
Hallo David,
Welkom op de UFONET -list. Deze lijst bestond echt nog niet eerder. Er wasw
vroeger wel een UFONED weet je nog?
Met de vriendelijke groeten,
Jeroen Kumeling
Ik dacht dat deze mailinglist al een tijd bestond?
Greetings,
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
http://www.f-s-f.com
Israeli Mid-Air UFO Explosion Analyzed - It's The Real Thing
by Barry Chamish
<chamish@...>
1-20-99
Last month I reported that I had acquired a video copy of a
mid-air UFO explosion over the Israeli city of Rosh Haayin. I
wrote that my impression was the video captured a profoundly
important moment: the first mid-air UFO collision ever recorded.
I requested that experts analyze the film scientifically. Within
a day, Dwight Connelly of MUFON committed himself to having the
video analyzed. The video is a compilation of two UFO events
recorded by Spasso Maximovitch in 1995 and 1996. I sent Dwight
both clips and he passed them on to MUFON's video expert Jeff
Sanio for computer analysis. The following is his report. I will
not comment on his conclusions. Jeff has no need of my analysis
of his analysis. Let's just sum matters up like this: It's The
Real Thing. Added to Israel's list of UFO firsts, is the first
mid-air explosion between two unexplained aerial craft ever
captured on videotape or any other media. Several film and TV
producers asked me to release the clip for their programs but I
had to turn them down. I am prevented by a copyright problem
from reproducing the film, though I am permitted to display my
copy. I am seeking a conference to premiere this remarkable
event. In the meantime, I will publish MUFON's full report on
http://members.tripod.com/~ufoisrael.
TEXT OF THE MUFON REPORT:
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:39:44 -0800
From: Jeff Sainio <jsainio@...
Reply-To: jsainio@...
To: chamish@...
Subject: my report
I left out the stills from the video, as you've already seen them.
The paper copy has already been sent.
Dwight Connelly
14026 Ridgelawn
Martinsville IL
62442
1-16-99
217-382-4502,4014
Videoanalysis
6/24/96
Rosh Haayin, central Israel
Spasso Maximovitch
Events as reported to me from Barry Chamish
(chamish@...): `On 28/9/95, Spasso Maximovitch
noticed an unexplainable object in the skies over Rosh Haayin in
central Israel. He grabbed his video camera and captured a
silvery, glowing object become, two, three and then four fiery
orbs, in a near square formation, over a wide expanse of the
northwestern sky. After this incident, Mr. Maximovitch became a
constant skywatcher. His dilgence was rewarded on 24/6/96 when a
similar silvery orb appeared in the lower western sky. He
trained his video camera on the orb... And then a glowing white
oval-shaped object appeared some 20 degrees west of the object
and streaked toward it at high speed. Within three seconds it
struck the stationary orb, causing a huge explosion in the sky
which must have destroyed both objects. Stunned, Maximovitch
stopped filming immediately after capturing the explosion.`
The submitted video, which was in PAL format, was converted to
NTSC format. It shows several events; a group of lights, one
apparently dropped from another (the dropping is seen in the
stills marked 28/9/1995 and 3:27:33); a stationary light which
is apparently struck by a moving light, and a triangle of
lights. The group of lights is interesting, but I could find no
basis for investigating any form of anomalousness. The triangle
of lights has no reference objects to indicate what or where it
is.
The stationary light was much more interesting. Various lights,
probably streetlights, in the video were used as reference
objects, and showed that the light was stationary over some 30
seconds. An approaching airplane's landing lights will appear
stationary, although motionlessness over this length of time
seems unusual.
A vertical tower structure, apparently made of girders, is near
the light. Some horizontal structure is atop the structure. It
was not sufficiently defined for continuous measurements to be
made from it.
Another bright object appears to the left and slightly below the
stationary object. In 2.9 seconds, it moves toward the
stationary object, apparently hitting and exploding. In 1/4
second, the explosion disappears with no trace of either object.
The 5-frame sequence to the right illustrates the sequence.
The bright object can be seen to move between the girders of the
vertical structure. This is useful in determining the relative
size of the moving light. (The size of the light as seen on the
video, is misleading; it is presumably much smaller than what is
seen, due to extreme overexposure and glare.) The light
disappears or reappears completely 6 times; in 3, the change is
abrupt; completely bright-to-dark or vice versa. In the other 3,
the change is gradual, with a frame showing partial brightness.
What can be learned from this? One must remember that the video
is a sequence of 1/50 second time exposures. Assume the light is
small, and that the moving object has only one light. If by
chance, the disappearance coincides with the period between
exposures, an abrupt disappearance will be seen. A large light,
or several lights horizontally separated, will never disappear
abruptly while moving slowly. Since 6 occurrences form a useful
population of samples, the moving light can reliably be said to
be quite small. This probably eliminates the flame from a
missile as a source.
Although the vertical structure was not a reliable reference
object, the two lights' relative position could be measured.
Over 500 measurements of the two lights' position were made. The
graph at right shows the distance between the 2 lights. Breaks
in the data line are due to unreliable data from camera motion
or the moving light going behind the girders. Reference straight
lines show constant speed. The slopes of the lines show that the
moving light spent about a second at some speed, then sped up
about 16% before the collision. The 16% is not due to a zoom
change; the tower is sufficiently visible to verify that its
size does not appreciably change. Although the graph shows noise
and missing data, the acceleration certainly occurred in under a
second. No reasonable object I know of is capable of a 16%
acceleration in a second.
When the 2 objects apparently collide and explode, the apparent
size of the light expands by a factor of roughly 2.5; this does
not appear to be due to overexposure, but is the real size of
the object. The last 2 frames of the video are NOT overexposed,
but diffuse; since overexposure is not involved, this indicates
the actual size of the explosion is shown. The real increase in
size of the bright area is certainly much larger than 2.5. In
the video the explosion moves downward; this is probably due to
camera motion of the startled videographer; the reference tower
is too smeared to verify this conclusion.
The explosion is not due to any conventional method I am
familiar with; conventional, large explosions require much more
than 1/4 second to disappear, and usually generate flaming
debris that falls from the explosion. Neither characteristic is
seen here.
The acceleration, light size, and explosion are not explainable
in any convention way that I know of, and this case remains
unidentified.
Jeff Sainio
MUFON Staff Photoanalyst
7206 W. Wabash
Milwaukee WI 53223-2609
jsainio@...
Onderstaande mail tot mij gekomen via de UASR Mailing List:
--[snipped]-----
Posted by : Dave Pigott <davep@...>
From: Francisco Lopez <d005734c@...>
From: K. Young <ufo@...>
Via: CURRENT-ENCOUNTERS@...
Subject: UFO Report accompanies explosive noise
Date: December 15, 1998 - 7:53 p.m.
Location: Portage, Indiana (Porter County)
On December 15, 1998, a 19-year old resident of Portage, Indiana
informed of his sighting of a UFO. The e-mail report states:
"I deliver pizzas for a local pizza shop. At 7:53 p.m. on Monday,
14th of December, I saw something that amazed me. I was driving north
on Swanson Rd. approaching Stone Ave., where I could only turn left or
right. As I was coming to a stop at Stone, I heard a semi-loud bang.
It sounded like a big firecracker, but the tone was deeper. Then, I
heard something that sounded like a brief, strong wind and it repeated
seven or eight times. I remained still at the stop sign while
listening to the sounds. A couple seconds later, a white light rose
off the ground to the northeast of me. It looked like it was about a
mile away. It went straight up about one hundred yards or so, stayed
for a few seconds, then shot west so fast, it looked like it could
have gone a hundred miles in a fraction of a second. As soon as it had
happened I wrote down on my notepad what happened, where I was, and
what time it was. After I did that, I looked around for other cars at
the stop sign so I could ask them if they saw what I saw, but there
was no one around. So I delivered the pizza and went back to work.
When I got home, I told my girlfriend what I saw, and she told me that
earlier in the night, while visiting her parents at their house on
Central and Willowdale, she heard a loud bang. But, I have not talked
to anyone else who saw it yet. This is the absolute truth of what I
saw. I did some searching on the Internet for somewhere to report
what I saw and I found this sight. I hope you appreciate my effort.
Thank you."
--------
Comment:
A reply was sent, asking if the witness would be interested in
following up his report by contacting local police offices to
determine if other residents in the area had reported the loud noise.
Although not expressing interest in pursuing this angle, he stated
that his mother was a private pilot, and would have her check with
'local airports' to see if any additional details could be found.
The Portage, Indiana report from December is similar to separate,
unrelated accounts earlier in the year from nearby Valparaiso, Kokomo
and Michigantown, Indiana. These reports were generated in June and
August. Portage is only 10-miles northwest of Valparaiso, Indiana, and
3-miles south of Lake Michigan.
Reports of the 1998 UFO sighings in Indiana are located at the
following URL locations:
http://home.fuse.net/ufo/Valparaiso.htmhttp://home.fuse.net/ufo/Kokomo.htmhttp://home.fuse.net/ufo/Michigantown.htm
The sonic anomaly reported with this UFO sighting remains a common
element in many unusual reports. Weeks after this sighting was
received, numerous instances of sonic disruption was reported across a
large area of the Midwestern United States on January 9th and 10th.
Explosive bangs and thuds were heard from areas in Indiana, Ohio,
Kentucky and Pennsylvania. Although 'Ice Quakes' and 'Frost Cracking'
were advanced as an explanation for the disruptions, a University of
Cincinnati geologist refuted the explanation. For details of this
report, see: http://home.fuse.net/ufo/Butlerboomer.htm
Filed:
January 16, 1999
Kenny Young
--
UFO Research
http://home.fuse.net/ufo/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UFOR responds only to the interest in the truth of its members,
readers, friends and the general public and it is sponsored and
sustained by the contributions (time, wisdom, articles, research and
money in any currency) of those who are in position to do so. Articles
and other posts should be sent to: d005734c@..., text format
only, please. Monetary contributions can be sent to: THE UFOR TRUST
FUND, XXXX, Bank of America, XXXXXX, SWIFT XXXXXX UFOR is a
non-profit organization registered in the State of Florida, USA
To respond to a post or article, be kind to answer directly to the
author and, if you want your response to be considered for public
posting, CC (Carbon Copy) to: d005734c@... The broadest
distribution of the articles published in UFOR is highly encouraged as
long as full attribution is given to the authors, the list or source
of the article as well as UFOR.
Posted by : Dave Pigott <davep@...>
--[snipped]-----
Groeten,
Frits Westra -- fwestra@...
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2 - Registered
>From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
>
>Hallo allemaal!
>
>Laat even van je horen of je je hebt aangemeld. Dan kunne we
binnenkort
>echt beginnen!
Ik dacht dat deze mailinglist al een tijd bestond?
Greetings,
David
--[snipped]-----
From: Craig Tupper <dtupper@...>
Greetings!
New stuff at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oss/ :
----------------
Hubble Technology Benefits New Satellite Phone System - Globalstar will use
HST-developed software to control its satellites via the Internet. Spinoff
PR at ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/pressrel/1999/99-003.txt
----------------
Galaxies Came Before Clusters - ROSAT results from some British astronomers.
RAS press release at http://www.ras.org.uk/ras/press/pn99-02.htm
U.S. ROSAT home page at http://guinan.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/rosat/rosgof.html
----------------
TRW has completed work on our Chandra X-ray Observatory (formerly AXAF);
shipment to KSC is scheduled for later this month, and launch is scheduled
for April.
TRW press release:
http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/cnn-storydisplay.cgi?story=/www/bw/webbo
x/bw.011499/955080.htm
(Ouch - what a URL!)
AXAF/Chandra home: http://xrtpub.harvard.edu/pub.html
----------------
The Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), having been heroically
recovered from near failure in November, has gotten into trouble again. The
last working gyroscope has failed, and the spacecraft is in safe mode;
efforts are underway to enable science operations without gyroscopes.
Latest details at http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/
----------------
The Japanese Nozomi mission, with one of our instruments aboard, will be
arriving at Mars about 4 years late in December 2003 because of excess fuel
consumption.
story at Yahoo (another enormous URL):
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/ap/science/story.html?s=v/ap/19990112/s
c/japan_mars_probe_1.html
NASA Nozomi page: http://webserver.gsfc.nasa.gov/java/planetb.html
----------------
The Submillimeter Wave Astronomy Satellite is now 1 month into its mission
and has just released its first exciting results, the first detections of
water vapor towards some of the coldest and most massive regions of
interstellar space, the clouds of gas and dust that ultimately collapse to
form stars and planets. More info at
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/oir/Research/swas.html
----------------
We and the National Science Foundation (NSF) are cooperating to map out the
nearest stars, and then investigate whether or not those stars have planets
circling them. Where do you want to go next century? More info at
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ep/pressrel/thenry.html
----------------
ASCA results: "Missing" Pulsars Within Exploded Stars Identified.
Press release at http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/cu-mpwes.html
ASCA home: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/asca/ascagof.html
----------------
Gap In Stellar Dust Disk May Be Swept Out By Planet - Hubble Space
Telescope results and images at
http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/03/pra.html
----------------
Dust Ring Around Star Offers New Clues Into Planet Formation - more Hubble
results at http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/pr/1999/03/prb.html
----------------
Finally, pretty soon the Space Science web site will be getting a new URL,
something shorter, easier to remember, and reflective of the fact that we
are one of NASA's four Strategic Enterprises funding gobs and gobs of cool
activities out there at the NASA Centers, industry, and academia. I hope
to let you know about it next week.
Cheers!
--[snipped]------
Groeten,
Frits Westra -- fwestra@...
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2 - Registered
> FIRST FLIGHT OF NASA'S 'SPACE PLANE' POSTPONED
The first flight of the X-33, a prototype for a space plane, will be pushed
back until later this year because of a problem with one of its two
hydrogen
fuel tanks. The X-33 is a $1.2 billion program by NASA and Lockheed Martin
Corp. to test the design of the VentureStar, an unmanned, reusable space
vehicle. The X-33 is a scaled-down version that was expected to fly this
winter
or spring.
Fuel tank separated
.... http://cnn.com/TECH/space/9901/20/space.plane.delay.ap/index.html
> SHUTTLE MISSION TO LAUNCH X-RAY TELESCOPE DELAYED
NASA on Wednesday delayed the launch of its newest and most powerful X-ray
telescope by at least five weeks because of flawed circuit boards that need
to
be replaced. It's the latest setback for NASA's $1.5 billion Chandra X-ray
Observatory, a Hubble-caliber instrument that should have rocketed into
orbit
last summer but was grounded until this spring because of computer software
trouble.
PLUTO MAY BE STRIPPED OF PLANETARY STATUS
Pluto, smaller than Earth's moon, was first classified as a planet nearly
40
years ago. Now the International Astronomical Union is considering revoking
that honor, leaving our solar system with just eight major planets. The
head of
the Planetary Systems Sciences Division says it's "obvious" Pluto doesn't
fit
because of its small size and irregular orbit.
New class of objects proposed
.... http://cnn.com/TECH/space/9901/20/puny.pluto/index.html
----------
From: murat aksoy <muratbir@...>
Subject: uso info
Date: Donnerstag, 21. Januar 1999 11:08
Dear UFO Researcher,
I am working on a special project related to USOs in all over of the
world, that is, I mean Unidentified Swimming /Submarine/ Submerged/
Submersible/ Aquatic Objects, or simply Underwater UFO Phenomenon.
Please would you help me by sending some USO-related information to me
in electronic, e-mail or attachment formats. Both articles and
pictures are accepted. If you do it for me, then I will be very glad
too. Please inform me about USO encounter in your country if you have
any.
I am looking forward to see your mail as soon as it is possible.
Wish you success at your work.
Murat AKSOY
UFOlogist and Social Psychologist, M.S.
muratbir@...
Jeroen Wierda wrote:
>
> From: Jeroen Wierda <pufori@...>
>
> Hoi,
>
> Ik ben present :-) Eindelijk weer een aktieve Nederlandse lijst.
>
> Groeten,
> Jeroen Wierda
> Picard UFO Research International
>
> E-Mail me : JeroenW@...
> URL to PUFORI: http://www.pufori.org/
> If I do not reply to mail addressed to me within 3 days, plz resend it.
>
> Postal address:
> Jeroen Wierda, PO Box 352, 5201 AJ 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeroen Kumeling [SMTP:ufonet@...]
> Sent: donderdag 21 januari 1999 1:38
> To: ufonet@onelist.com
> Subject: [ufonet] Hallo daar ufonet-lijstleden!
>
> From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
>
> Hallo allemaal!
>
> Laat even van je horen of je je hebt aangemeld. Dan kunne we binnenkort
> echt beginnen!
>
> Jeroen
>
Hehee!! Hi Jeroen! We zouden nog wat afspreken maar je weet hoe dat gaat
busy, busy enzo ;-) Maar goed, dat moesten we zeker nog maar een keer
doen, zullen elkaar nu wel iets vaker spreken/mailen :)
Andy Denne
(A.U.R.A.)
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> http://www.f-s-f.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> http://www.f-s-f.com
Jeroen Kumeling wrote:
>
> From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
>
> Ter Kennisgeving
> Een UFOmelding uit Nijmegen
> (Lijkt overigens veel op een verschijning dat ik heb gezien in 1992)
>
> email verstuurd op zondag 17 januari 99,
>
> Geachte UFO Meldpunt,
>
> ...............................................
> ...............................................
> Vroeger stond ik vaak een beetje sceptisch tegenover ufo's
> Maar een paar dagen geleden is dit veranderd.
> ................................................
> Ik stond een paar dagen geleden om een uur of zeven op de bus te wachten.
> Het was vrij koud,dus ik zat een beetje te springen
> Ik keek omhoog en zag een lichtpuntje vrij rap naar links bewegen.
> Ik dacht eerst dat het vliegtuig was. Maar het object maakte bochten van 90
> graden en dat kan een vliegtuig niet. Een meteoor kon het ook niet zijn
> want die gaan niet van links naar rechts.
> Plots kwamen er nog twee lichtpunten. Ik werd toch een beetje bang.
> Toen draaiden ze met z'n drieen om elkaar heen. Ik wreef in
> mijn ogen, ik dacht dat ik gek werd. Maar opeens waren ze weg
> Echt WAAR!! Dit kan geen vliegtuig of helicopter of meteoor zijn geweest.
> ...................................
> ...................................
>
> Melding wordt nog nagetrokken en er wordt geprobeerd een exactere
> tijdsaanduiding te achterhalen:
> Dus nog in onderzoek.
>
Inderdaad Jeroen,
Zoals je weet hebben we contact opgenomen met die jongen, maar helaas
hebben we tot op heden nog niets vernomen...tijd zal het leren.
Hee, maar even iets anders..ik kan me herinneren dat een jaar of twee(?)
geleden ook zo'n soort melding op de TV was...een of ander nederlands
nieuws... ik geloof zelfs dat het in twente was! Verder heb ik vanuit
Limburg 1994 een soortgelijke melding!
Zoek hem wel op en FWD hem dan ff!
De groetjes uit Nijmegen,
Andy Denne & Annelies Joor
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> http://www.f-s-f.com
mighty wrote:
>
> From: mighty <mischa.van.delden@...>
>
> YEAH! RIGHT! LET'S GET STARTED!
> haha, ben d'r helemaal klaarvoor!
>
> met groet,
> Mischa.
...Inderdaad! Laat maar komen :)
Andy.
>
> Jeroen Kumeling schreef:
>
> > From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
> >
> > Hallo allemaal!
> >
> > Laat even van je horen of je je hebt aangemeld. Dan kunne we binnenkort
> > echt beginnen!
> >
> > Jeroen
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> > to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> > select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> > http://www.f-s-f.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> http://www.f-s-f.com
Hoi,
Ik ben present :-) Eindelijk weer een aktieve Nederlandse lijst.
Groeten,
Jeroen Wierda
Picard UFO Research International
E-Mail me : JeroenW@...
URL to PUFORI: http://www.pufori.org/
If I do not reply to mail addressed to me within 3 days, plz resend it.
Postal address:
Jeroen Wierda, PO Box 352, 5201 AJ 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen Kumeling [SMTP:ufonet@...]
Sent: donderdag 21 januari 1999 1:38
To: ufonet@onelist.com
Subject: [ufonet] Hallo daar ufonet-lijstleden!
From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
Hallo allemaal!
Laat even van je horen of je je hebt aangemeld. Dan kunne we binnenkort
echt beginnen!
Jeroen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
http://www.f-s-f.com
Dit stond afgelopen maandag op de Atlantic Mailing List. Ik heb Andre
Bradao vandaag een mailtje gestuurd om te informeren of hij hierover
nog nadere details heeft ontvangen. Heb er nog geen antwoord op gehad.
Als er nieuws over is, komt 't hier op Ufonet!
Groeten,
Frits
--[snipped]-----
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 03:12:28 +0100 (GMT+0100)
From: Andre Brandao <l42303@...>
Subject: [Atlantic] Flames at 36N41W?
Hello
Ive been listening to 6628 for the last 2 hours (it is now
0300UTC) and New York ATC is requesting flights that overfly 36N41W if
they see any kind of flames or light. All of these because one
flight at around 0030 UTC (I was not listening at that time) reported
a strange light closed to that location.
At 0215UTC a CKT flight was requested to confirm it and the answer
was something like this "There is indeed a stange light at or above sea
level but I cannot see more because of clouds".
At 0250 UTC a Virgin flight reported "There are no flames at
4134N3628W".
All these flights were requested to monitor 121.5 but no activity
on that freq was reported.
This position is 60 NM west of New York/Santa Maria boundary, in
NY area.
Any suggestions for what it might be?
Best regards, Andre Brandao
--[snipped]-----
Hallo allemaal,
Zo'n eerste bijdrage aan deze glimmend nieuwe mailing list moet
natuurlijk wel een goeie zijn. Via via afkomstig van IUFO.
Groet,
Frits
--[snipped]-----
ISRAELI MID-AIR UFO EXPLOSION ANALYZED- IT'S THE REAL THING
by Barry Chamish
Last month I reported that I had acquired a video copy of a mid-air UFO
explosion over the Israeli city of Rosh Haayin. I wrote that my impression
was the video captured a profoundly important moment: the first mid-air UFO
collision ever recorded. I requested that experts analyze the film
scientifically.
Within a day, Dwight Connelly of MUFON committed himself to having the
video analyzed. The video is a compilation of two UFO events recorded by
Spasso Maximovitch in 1995 and 1996. I sent Dwight both clips and he passed
them on to MUFON's video expert Jeff Sanio for computer analysis. The
following is his report.
I will not comment on his conclusions. Jeff has no need of my analysis of
his analysis. Let's just sum matters up like this: It's The Real Thing.
Added to Israel's list of UFO firsts, is the first mid-air explosion between
two unexplained aerial craft ever captured on videotape or any other media.
Several film and TV producers asked me to release the clip for their
programs but I had to turn them down. I am prevented by a copyright problem
from reproducing the film, though I am permitted to display my copy. I am
seeking a conference to premiere this remarkable event. In the meantime, I
will publish MUFON's full report on
http://members.tripod.com/~ufoisrael.
TEXT OF THE MUFON REPORT:
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:39:44 -0800
From: Jeff Sainio <jsainio@...>
Reply-To: jsainio@...
To: chamish@...
Subject: my report
I left out the stills from the video, as you've already seen them.
The paper copy has already been sent.
Dwight Connelly
14026 Ridgelawn
Martinsville IL
62442
1-16-99
217-382-4502,4014
Videoanalysis
6/24/96
Rosh Haayin, central Israel
Spasso Maximovitch
Events as reported to me from Barry Chamish (chamish@...):
`On 28/9/95, Spasso Maximovitch noticed an unexplainable object in the
skies over Rosh Haayin in central Israel. He grabbed his video camera
and captured a silvery, glowing object become, two, three and then four
fiery orbs, in a near square formation, over a wide expanse of the
northwestern sky. After this incident, Mr. Maximovitch became a constant
skywatcher. His dilgence was rewarded on 24/6/96 when a similar silvery
orb appeared in the lower western sky. He trained his video camera on
the orb... And then a glowing white oval-shaped object appeared some
20 degrees west of the object and streaked toward it at high speed.
Within three seconds it struck the stationary orb, causing a huge
explosion in the sky which must have destroyed both objects. Stunned,
Maximovitch stopped filming immediately after capturing the explosion.`
The submitted video, which was in PAL format, was converted to NTSC
format. It shows several events; a group of lights, one apparently
dropped from another (the dropping is seen in the stills marked
28/9/1995 and 3:27:33); a stationary light which is apparently struck by
a moving light, and a triangle of lights. The group of lights is
interesting, but I could find no basis for investigating any form of
anomalousness. The triangle of lights has no reference objects to
indicate what or where it is.
The stationary light was much more interesting. Various lights,
probably streetlights, in the video were used as reference objects, and
showed that the light was stationary over some 30 seconds. An
approaching airplane's landing lights will appear stationary, although
motionlessness over this length of time seems unusual.
A vertical tower structure, apparently made of girders, is near the
light. Some horizontal structure is atop the structure. It was not
sufficiently defined for continuous measurements to be made from it.
Another bright object appears to the left and slightly below the
stationary object. In 2.9 seconds, it moves toward the stationary
object, apparently hitting and exploding. In 1/4 second, the explosion
disappears with no trace of either object. The 5-frame sequence to the
right illustrates the sequence.
The bright object can be seen to move between the girders of the
vertical structure. This is useful in determining the relative size of
the moving light. (The size of the light as seen on the video, is
misleading; it is presumably much smaller than what is seen, due to
extreme overexposure and glare.) The light disappears or reappears
completely 6 times; in 3, the change is abrupt; completely
bright-to-dark or vice versa. In the other 3, the change is gradual,
with a frame showing partial brightness. What can be learned from
this? One must remember that the video is a sequence of 1/50 second
time exposures. Assume the light is small, and that the moving object
has only one light. If by chance, the disappearance coincides with the
period between exposures, an abrupt disappearance will be seen. A large
light, or several lights horizontally separated, will never disappear
abruptly while moving slowly. Since 6 occurrences form a useful
population of samples, the moving light can reliably be said to be quite
small. This probably eliminates the flame from a missile as a source.
Although the vertical structure was not a reliable reference object, the
two lights' relative position could be measured. Over 500 measurements
of the two lights' position were made. The graph at right shows the
distance between the 2 lights. Breaks in the data line are due to
unreliable data from camera motion or the moving light going behind the
girders. Reference straight lines show constant speed. The slopes of
the lines show that the moving light spent about a second at some speed,
then sped up about 16% before the collision. The 16% is not due to a
zoom change; the tower is sufficiently visible to verify that its size
does not appreciably change. Although the graph shows noise and missing
data, the acceleration certainly occurred in under a second. No
reasonable object I know of is capable of a 16% acceleration in a
second.
When the 2 objects apparently collide and explode, the apparent size of
the light expands by a factor of roughly 2.5; this does not appear to be
due to overexposure, but is the real size of the object. The last 2
frames of the video are NOT overexposed, but diffuse; since overexposure
is not involved, this indicates the actual size of the explosion is
shown. The real increase in size of the bright area is certainly much
larger than 2.5. In the video the explosion moves downward; this is
probably due to camera motion of the startled videographer; the
reference tower is too smeared to verify this conclusion.
The explosion is not due to any conventional method I am familiar with;
conventional, large explosions require much more than 1/4 second to
disappear, and usually generate flaming debris that falls from the
explosion. Neither characteristic is seen here.
The acceleration, light size, and explosion are not explainable in any
convention way that I know of, and this case remains unidentified.
Jeff Sainio
MUFON Staff Photoanalyst
7206 W. Wabash
Milwaukee WI 53223-2609
jsainio@...
--[snipped]-----
Nieuws van de interessante Nederlandstalige site van Actaeon, te bezoeken
via:
http://www.actaeon.nl
Aapmens van 3,6 miljoen jaar oud
Antropologen in Zuid-Afrika hebben een 3,6 miljoen jaar oud volledig skelet
van een aapmens gevonden. Tot nu toe gold 'Lucy', die in 1974 in Ethiopië
werd ontdekt, als het meest complete exemplaar van de vermoedelijk rechtop
lopende oermens van de soort Australopethicus.
De aapmens, die is gevonden in Sterkfontein bij Johannesburg, liep
vermoedelijk ook al rechtop, was 120 centimeter groot en leefde in beboste
gebieden.
Sumerisch spijkerschrift niet het oudst
In het zuiden van Egypte is een schrift ontdekt dat mogelijk ouder is dan
het Sumerische spijkerschrift. Het schrift van de Sumeriërs, die deel
uitmaakten van de Mesopotamische beschaving, dateert van ongeveer 3000 voor
Christus.
Het nu, door de Duitse archeoloog Günter Dreyer, ontdekte schrift wordt
geschat op een ouderdom van 5300 jaar. Het grootste deel van de ontdekking
werd gedaan in het graf van koning Schorpioen in de provincie Suhag, 500
kilometer ten zuiden van Caïro.
SYMPOSIUM 'MOEDER AARDE EN DE 4e DIMENSIE'
Op Zaterdag 10 april en Zondag 11 april 1999 word t voor de tweede maal
door Rudi Klijnstra i.s.m. OIBIBIO een symposium georganiseerd met binnen-
en buitenlandse sprekers. Dit gebeurt in OIBIBIO te Amsterdam. Het betreft
een symposium over graancirkels en aanverwante zaken gehouden zoals
sjamanisme, Moeder Aarde-rituelen, 4e dimensie, etc. Naast lezingen zijn er
2 concerten en wordt er een workshop gegeven.
De sprekers zijn o.a.: (onder voorbehoud)
Steve Alexander (U.K.), luchtfotograaf: Graancirkels in Engeland
Karen Douglas (U.K.), cereologe: Graancirkelonderzoek
Olga Khartapidi (U.S.S.R.), auteur: Het Pad naar de sjamaan
Rudi Klijnstra, auteur: Graancirkels, codes uit een andere dimensie &
Andere Dimensies
Robbert van den Broeke, cereoloog: In kontakt met een andere dimensie
Sandra Steverink, cereoloog/kunstenares: Symbolen en de levensenergie
WORKSHOPS/SEMINARS
Suthisa Torenbeek,: De verschillende gezichten van de Godin
Olga Khartapidi : Psychiatrie en Sjamanisme
Naast lezingen en workshops worden er een tweetal concerten gegeven en is
er een expositie van verschillende kunstenaars.
VOOR HET VOLLEDIG PROGRAMMA NEEM S.V.P. KONTAKT OP MET OIBIBIO, Prins
Hendrikkade 20-21, AMSTERDAM.
English text
'MOTHER EARTH AND THE 4th DIMENSION'
On Saterday 10th and Sunday 11th April 1999 for the second time in Holland
a symposium will be held about Cropcircles, Shamanism and Mother Earth &
the 4th Dimension.
This 2-day symposion is organised by Rudi Klijnstra and New Age center
OIBIBIO in Amsterdam
Besides lectures there will be concerts and workshops and an art-exhibition
of several Dutch artists.
Speakers (not confirmed)
Steve Alexander, photographer: Crop Circles in England
Karen Douglas, cereologist: Crop Circle research
Olga Khartapidi, author: Entering the circle
Rudi Klijnstra, artist/author: Crop Circles, codes from another dimension &
Other Dimensions
Robbert van den Broeke, cereologist: In contact with another dimension
Sandra Steverink, artist/cereologist: Symbols and the effect on life-energy
WORKSHOPS
Suthisa Torenbeek 'The different faces of the Goddess'
Olga Khartapidi 'Psychiatry and Shamanism'
For a complete program please contact OIBIBIO, Prins Hendrikkade 20-21,
Amsterdam, Holland.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GLASTONBURY SYMPOSIUM 'SIGNS OF OUR TIMES'
30, 31 July and 1 August 1999 in the Assembley Rooms, Glastonbury, U.K.
Ter Kennisgeving
Een UFOmelding uit Nijmegen
(Lijkt overigens veel op een verschijning dat ik heb gezien in 1992)
email verstuurd op zondag 17 januari 99,
Geachte UFO Meldpunt,
...............................................
...............................................
Vroeger stond ik vaak een beetje sceptisch tegenover ufo's
Maar een paar dagen geleden is dit veranderd.
................................................
Ik stond een paar dagen geleden om een uur of zeven op de bus te wachten.
Het was vrij koud,dus ik zat een beetje te springen
Ik keek omhoog en zag een lichtpuntje vrij rap naar links bewegen.
Ik dacht eerst dat het vliegtuig was. Maar het object maakte bochten van 90
graden en dat kan een vliegtuig niet. Een meteoor kon het ook niet zijn
want die gaan niet van links naar rechts.
Plots kwamen er nog twee lichtpunten. Ik werd toch een beetje bang.
Toen draaiden ze met z'n drieen om elkaar heen. Ik wreef in
mijn ogen, ik dacht dat ik gek werd. Maar opeens waren ze weg
Echt WAAR!! Dit kan geen vliegtuig of helicopter of meteoor zijn geweest.
...................................
...................................
Melding wordt nog nagetrokken en er wordt geprobeerd een exactere
tijdsaanduiding te achterhalen:
Dus nog in onderzoek.
YEAH! RIGHT! LET'S GET STARTED!
haha, ben d'r helemaal klaarvoor!
met groet,
Mischa.
Jeroen Kumeling schreef:
> From: "Jeroen Kumeling" <ufonet@...>
>
> Hallo allemaal!
>
> Laat even van je horen of je je hebt aangemeld. Dan kunne we binnenkort
> echt beginnen!
>
> Jeroen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
> to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
> select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bezoek ook eens de homepages van Ufo Werkgroep Nederland:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet en Frontier Sciences Foundation:
> http://www.f-s-f.com
Doe mee met de gratis Ufonet Nieuws en Discussie Emaillijst en meld je aan
via:
http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/ufonet
UFO-Werkgroep Nederland
ufonet@...http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet
Postbus 2191, 7500 CD Enschede
tel/fax: +31 74 2425514 UFO-HOTLINE: +31 53 4310412
Iedere maandagavond tussen 23.00 en 00.00 uur het real-audio -
radioprogramma FENOMENEN.
Een programma voorbij tijd en ruimte. Met aandacht voor onder andere:
paranormale verschijnselen, UFO's, Graancirkels, alternatieve geneeswijzen,
geheime genootschappen, astrologie etc etc.
Verder: de activiteiten-agenda en een overzicht uit diverse tijdschriften.
Presentatie en redactie: Jeroen Kumeling.
FENOMENEN is te vinden via: http://www.twente.nl , met onderaan de pagina:
Nu met live muziek van Radio Enschede! - Real Audio
(ook alleen via HetNet van KPN te bereiken)
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Jeroen Kumeling
UFO-Werkgroep Nederland
ufonet@...http://www.xs4all.nl/~ufonet
Postbus 2191, 7500 CD Enschede
tel/fax: +31 74 2425514 UFO-HOTLINE: +31 53 4310412
Iedere maandagavond tussen 23.00 en 00.00 uur het real-audio -
radioprogramma FENOMENEN.
Een programma voorbij tijd en ruimte. Met aandacht voor onder andere:
paranormale verschijnselen, UFO's, Graancirkels, alternatieve geneeswijzen,
geheime genootschappen, astrologie etc etc.
Verder: de activiteiten-agenda en een overzicht uit diverse tijdschriften.
Presentatie en redactie: Jeroen Kumeling.
FENOMENEN is te vinden via: http://www.twente.nl , met onderaan de pagina:
Nu met live muziek van Radio Enschede! - Real Audio
(ook alleen via HetNet van KPN te bereiken)