Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
understandingmath · Understanding Mathematics
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [umath] Pythagoras   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #13 of 37 |
> Do you have a good or favorite proof or way to see it intuitively???
> ... But still I dont "Grok" (Heinlein) it.

I thought about it last night, and came up with something
that might help.

Given an a,b,h triangle, we know that h is a function of a and b,
i.e. h=F(a,b).

Take the partial derivative with respect to a. Looking at
a diagram, the triangle with sides "delta h" and "delta a"
is, in the limit, similar to the a,b,h triangle, so that

dh/da = a/h

Multiplying both sides by h, we have

h dh/da =a

Integrating gives us

(1/2) h^2 = (1/2) a^2 + f(b)

When a=0, we have that h=b , so that f(b) must be (1/2) b^2.
Multiplying by 2 gives the Pythagorean identity:
h^2 = a^2 + b^2.

So, Pythagoras' identity can be viewed as the integral version
of a differential relationship involving similar triangles.

Incidentally, after writing the above I did a search to
see if the above proof has been published. Of course it
has! It's essentially number 40 in the list of 43 proofs at
<http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/index.shtml>
It was published in 1988 in an issue of The Mathematical
Intelligencer.

All the best,

Walter

--- monkeyEinstein wrote:
> Hi Walter,
> This is Dave C. of the StonyBrook Aquatic team.
> I was looking at you connections on Pythagoras.
> Although I know how to "prove" a^2 + b^2= h^2 for a,b,h=hypoteneuse
> the sides of a rt. triangle, I still have a hard time seeing why in
> an intuitive way.
> Do you have a good or favorite proof or way to see it intuitively???
> I saw a cut and paste proof I liked in long ago in a book The Ascent
> of Man. But still I dont "Grok" (Heinlein) it.
>
> Maybe an algebraic proof would be better. Like...
> "Certaintly a+b=h (n=1) can't be true, so how about a^n + b^n = h^n.
> For n large, it certaintly cant be true.
> Now there is a right angle, which divides the plane into 4 equal
> regions...." I give up.
>
> And what about the generalization to non-right angles triangles?
> (Law of cosines I think)
> Have you "connected" that to anything?
>
> Got to go,
> Take Care,
> Dave




Thu Aug 21, 2003 9:34 pm

waltervannini
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #13 of 37 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... I thought about it last night, and came up with something that might help. Given an a,b,h triangle, we know that h is a function of a and b, i.e. h=F(a,b)....
Walter Vannini
waltervannini
Offline Send Email
Aug 21, 2003
9:34 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help