> is there anything in my so called S.S. Code?

Hard to say. The arithmetic follows from known algebraic identities.
That part of your findings isn't new.

As for the historical/biblical connections, I wouldn't know if
there's anything new there. It all looks similar to other results
I've seen, but that doesn't mean much. It could be that you've
discovered something new.

I expect that it will be hard to find mathematicians who also
have the extra expertise necessary to competently judge your
work. I don't know of any. Good luck!

Walter

--- numberland2001 wrote:
> I was wondering.
>
> Yes, I was wondering this morning about some basic arithmetic, I have
> pompously titled, the S.S. Code, (the reason for such could be given
> in another post).
>
> And my wonderment requires an explanation from people who understand
> mathematics, for I simply know not why it works out.
>
> OK, I must admit I am expecting to make a fool of myself with this,
> but no matter.
>
> The exercise is this, and my key numbers are 1,473.230769 and 6,840
> and 14.
>
> a. 6,840 less 1,473.230769 and /1,473.230769 and x 14 is the answer
> 51.
>
> b. 6,840 less 1,473.230769 and less 1,473.230769 and /1,473.230769 x
> 14 is the answer 37.
>
> c. 6,840 less 1,473.230769 and less 1,473.230769 and less
> 1,473.230769 x 14 is the answer 23.
>
> d. 6,840 less 1,473.230769 x 4 and /1,473.230769 x 14 is the answer 9.
>
> Thus there is a difference of 14 between each item.
>
> OK, next to:
>
> e. 1,473.230769 x 5 lots less 6,840 and /1,473.230769 x 14 is the
> answer 5.
>
> f. 1,473.230769 x 6 lots less 6,840 and /1,473.230769 x 14 is the
> answer 19.
>
> g. And 1,473.230769 x 7 lots has the answer 33
>
> h. And 1,473.230769 x 8 lots has the answer 47
>
> i. And 1,473.230769 x 9 lots has the answer 61
>
> j. And 10 lots is 75 and 11 lots is 89 and 12 lots 103 and 13 lots is
> 117.
>
> So a difference of 14 between them.
>
> OK, now some of the above reference numbers I use when considering
> the architecture of Ancient Egypt, noting that the Seked of the
> Pyramid Age included the ratio 14/11.
>
> And the standard measuring unit for the Pyramid Age was 20.612 inches
> to the cubit, and the measuring rod consisted of 28 Ancient Egyptian
> gods, each with a glyph a finger width wide 1/28, but the powerful
> god Horus was indicated twice.
>
> So 1,473.230769 x 28 lots and less 6,840 and /1,473.230769 x 14 is
> 327.
>
> Now 327 is made up of thrice 109.
>
> And the reference number 109 is that for `Fire'.
>
> So when I place Fire at 109 into the Lamp at 17 (the seventh prime of
> course) the number is 126, that of the `Eye of Horus', and
> the spirit body inside all humanity released at natural death.
>
> And 7 x 109,000 + 6 x 17,000 is 865,000 miles the diameter of the Sun.
>
> OK, now the Lamp, that is the Serpent, at 17 x 1,473.230769 less 6840
> and /1,473.230769 x 14 is 173, and 1,730,000 is twice 865,000 miles.
>
> So the Lamp changes into twice the Sun using 1,473.230769 and 6,840
> and 14.
>
> And just to finish, I go to St. George's Hall, that is St.
> George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, was rebuilt in 1829 in Gothic
> style,
> at a length of 185 feet.
>
> And the number 185 is seen in the Bible's 185,000 dead.
>
> "And it came to pass that night, that the angel of Yahweh went
> out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and
> five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they
> [were] all dead corpses. So Sennacherib king of Assyria departed, and
> went and returned, and dwelt at Nineveh." 2Kings 19:35-36
>
> And 6,840 less 1,473.230769 twice and /1,473.230769 x 70 is 185.
>
> And so I will stop here, and ask this board, (I have asked no others
> of any persuasion), is there anything in my so called S.S. Code?
>
> Thanks
>
> John D. Miller
> North London, UK.