Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
univalg · List for use by the Universal Algebra co
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Digest Number 159   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #296 of 654 |
These sound like results of Walter Taylor from the early '70's
publshed in Algebra Universalis


At 12:24 PM +0000 5/15/05, univalg@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>There is 1 message in this issue.
>
>Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. absolute retracts in varieties of algebras
> From: "p_ouwehand" <peter@...>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 08:27:39 -0000
> From: "p_ouwehand" <peter@...>
>Subject: absolute retracts in varieties of algebras
>
>I have a simple characterization of the absolute retracts in a
>variety of algebras: An algebra A is an absolute retract if and only
>if it is (i) equationally compact, and (ii) algebraically closed
>(i.e. every finite set of equations satisfiable in some extension of
>A is already satisfiable in A). In particular, a finite algebra is an
>absolute retract if and only if it it is algebraically closed.
>
>>From previous work, I know that in a congruence distributive variety
>every finite absolute retract is a product of maximal subdirectly
>irreducibles (i.e. those s.i.'s that have no proper essential
>extensions), and that in lattice varieties, the converse holds as
>well.
>
>Thus in a variety of lattices, the finite algebraically closed
>lattices are precisely products of maximal subdirectly irreducibles.
>E.g., the finite AC distributive lattices are exactly the finite
>Boolean lattices, a result apparently due to Schmid (1979).
>
>What I would like to know is the following: (1) Are the above results
>already known (and where can I find them)?, and (2) Are there any
>significant papers that study algebraically closed algebras in
>general (particularly the congruence distributive case)?
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------




Sun May 15, 2005 11:31 pm

wmalampe
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #296 of 654 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

These sound like results of Walter Taylor from the early '70's publshed in Algebra Universalis...
Bill Lampe
wmalampe
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2005
11:41 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help