Hi Matthew,

Some late reply due to ... never mind ...

'the greatest issue was that the timing of individual
field validation was off.'

don't know what you exactly mean by this phrase, however, I dived
into to your code; I think the way it is solved now is OK, it stays a
little counterintuitive but especially when you use DHTML to create
elements after loading the page it is better this way.

After making some small modifications (the European way) I think by
tomorrow I'll introduce this one in our group.

XNAHT, BOR


--- In validation@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Frank" <bigjuju@h...>
wrote:
> the best way to alter or disable is to make targetted changes to
the script.
> you can remove sections of code completely (removing the required
marking)
> or alter sections (change from . to , in currency checks).
previous
> versions of the script were internationalizedc, but that ended up
being too
> great a drain on my time for maintenance.
>
> as for the relational operations: i would prefer to rip them out,
but they
> are fairly useful. the greatest issue was that the timing of
individual
> field validation was off. the result is the simplest workaround.
once
> you're more familiar with how it operates, you can create the same
effects.
> not a great answer, i know.
>
> if you make changes, please post your ideas and fixes back to the
group so
> others can benefit--especially regarding relational validation.
>
>
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "echooche2002 <echoput@k...>" <echoput@k...>
> Reply-To: validation@yahoogroups.com
> To: validation@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [validation] version 3.1.0
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:24:25 -0000
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently downloaded version 3.1.0; I think it's a very promising
> solution; however, I got some questions/remarks:
>
> 1) it seems there isn't a way you can indicate whether you want or
> not to use the required marking (the small red triangle)
> 2) the dependency logic is somehow counterintuitive: it is now
stored
> as an attribute of the dependent field instead of the field causing
> the dependency
> 3) there is no way to indicate which thousand/decimal separator to
> use in case of a float? In our case, we have to use the European
> notation ...
>
>
> Might be more suggestions/remarks will follow as I consider it as a
> very valuable script which I'll introduce for use in our team
> responsible for the IntraNet.
>
> Good work!
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 3 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?
page=features/junkmail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU=
> http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-
bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_smartspamprotection_3mf