Hello Earl! Thank you for the information, I have made the changes
and cursory testing shows all is well.

I find these in the wanted snips index, seems as if some
substitutions (author,name & snip) are not being made somewhere?

[create [author]] (2: template-comments-item template-du-jour-day )
[create [name]] (1: template-topics-entry )
[create [snip]] (1: template-du-jour-archive-link )

I had fiddled around with the sidebox dj-archive.r a little but
hadn't been able to figure out my problem. I'm not certain but
wondering if the libdj2.r modifications that were part of that
package were old and regressed my 0.6.2.. Any ideas?

--
Regards,
John

On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:14:59 -0000 GMT, lord_earl_walker wrote:

> --- In vanilla-pudding@yahoogroups.com, Earl Walker <earl.walker@...>
> wrote:

> hi john,

> Saturday, October 21, 2006, 9:05:13 AM, John wrote:

>> RewriteEngine on
>> RewriteRule ^/$ /space/start [R,L]
>> RewriteRule ^/space/(.*)$ /exec/www?selector=display&snip=$1 [PT]
>> ScriptAlias /exec/ /home/john/domains/blog.example/public_html/cgi-bin/

> looks good.

>> SNIP ->> COMMENT (BOTTOM FORM) -> ERROR

> that there _are_ two comment forms is a bug in vanilla 0.6.2 - if you
> switch to dj2 instead of the old du-jour, this will be gone. you can
> do this by simply changing the 'start' snip from

> {!du-jour.du-jour:12;2001-01-01}

> to

> {!dj2.dj-days:14}

>> After a little poking around I found in the dj2.comments.r file the
>> line:

>> http-redir rejoin [ vanilla-base-url vanilla-display-url s ]

> this is a bug, it should be

> http-redir rejoin [ vanilla-display-url s ]

>> Final, question for now.. What happens to [today?] entries? Will the
>> start snip just grow forever or does it cycle monthly into an
>> archived state? .. or do I need to do something manually?

> each "today" entry is actually created as separate snip, the start
> snip just displays the 12 most recent snips created that follow a
> certain naming convention.

> so there is no need to do something manually.