> I am still pondering the 'wIv' operation, and whether it is worth it.

Of course it is. :) Brian took the time to add those four lines to the
spec, it's up to us to implement it. Of course, if you're not doing type
checking anywhere else (i.e. like the reference implementation), just copy
the code from latlh and be done with it.



> Anyway, knowing your interest in programming languages, i thought you
> might want to take a look at Water and see what you can do.

The first time you posted about Water, I saved the message so I could go
back and look at it. Then I never did.

So, I shall.


> BTW, I really enjoy Scott's posts, but I don't think he will be with
> us for long--his tlhIngan name means "one who disappears" or "The
> Invisible Man" or "The Shadow" or "Lurker" or something! :)

That's okay. If he does nothing but prod us to think about var'aq again,
he's done more for the project than a silent mailing list.

That, and it gives me something to do to answer his messages that's at
least slightly more engaging than trash summer tv. :)


j