Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
videoblogging
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Do you trust what you see?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #71837 of 76690 |
Interesting article today about photojournalism, but I think it also
applies to video as well. I always think about criminal cases, when
does someone alter a digital photo to achive their desired results?
This is the stuff that scares me about technology, especiality
digital tech....

http://www.newsweek.com/id/152989

When a mysterious creature washed up on the shores of Montauk, N.Y.,
in late July, it became an instant media sensation. After the
photograph of the Montauk Monster ran on Manhattan media blog Gawker,
local Long Island newspapers were on the story. CNN and Fox News
quickly followed, hosting experts to hash out what exactly this
unrecognizeable being was. Perhaps a bloated raccoon, as Discover
Magazine claimed and Jeff Corwin told Fox? A dead dog that had
decayed for weeks? Or, the latest spin: The creature was simply fake,
a prop in a movie's viral marketing campaign, and the media had been
duped.

The public's skepticism over whether or not they can believe what
they see in photographs isn't unwarranted. Just last week, Beijing
organizers admitted to using "previously recorded footage" and
computerized images during the Olympic opening ceremony to enhance
the quality of fireworks for broadcast on television. A month before
that, a doctored photograph of Iranian missiles turned up on front
pages across the globe. The alteration—an extra missile added to the
image—was outed within hours of the photograph's publication. "With
technology, you can make the moment anything you want it to be," says
John Long, the ethics committee chair for the National Press
Photographers Association. "Our credibility has been stretched in so
many ways, so I don't think the public has a great deal of faith in
us." He admits the past year hasn't been the best for
photojournalism's credibility but doesn't think the future is
particularly gloomy—it just puts the burden on the photojournalist to
tell the truth, rather than on the photograph itself. "Just like we
trust the reporter to represent what they see accurately, we're going
to have to develop that same relationship with photographers," he
says. NEWSWEEK's Sarah Kliff spoke with Long about why the
credibility of photojournalism has fallen, whether or not doctored
photographs are more likely to get caught these days, and how
photographers can reclaim the public's trust. Excerpts:

for the rest of the article follow the link
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152989

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com




Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:32 pm

hpbatman7
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #71837 of 76690 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Interesting article today about photojournalism, but I think it also applies to video as well. I always think about criminal cases, when does someone alter a...
Heath
hpbatman7
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2008
8:32 pm

Nothing's believable, really. Even if information isn't being deliberately altered, it's being spun most of the time for the sake of making some particular...
Bill Cammack
reelsolidtv
Offline Send Email
Aug 18, 2008
9:12 pm

But if you know what the spin is or the person who is giving you the information, I think that helps....I do think people at one time trusted certain,...
Heath
hpbatman7
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2008
2:23 am

Yes. I agree that the person who delivers the information has to be credible and considered honest by the viewers if the station wants their information to be...
Bill Cammack
reelsolidtv
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2008
4:46 am

Of course it's subjective of the person taking the video or picture, etc....that holds true...however, I think it was always a "spin"...sure there were times,...
Heath
hpbatman7
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2008
2:08 pm

That's because previously, we didn't have a choice. If the news told you that Cory Lidle's plane crashed into a building and that that building was currently...
Bill Cammack
reelsolidtv
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2008
6:06 pm

For a long time, photos could be considered the smoking gun. If you were told: "John is gay." You'd probably ask around before believing it but if you saw a...
Patrick Delongchamp
pdelongchamp
Offline Send Email
Aug 21, 2008
9:55 pm

Hi Everyone, I used to have faith in reporters, whether they be print or photographic. Now that I've had experience in so much of life, I don't trust them any...
John Esberg
dak_esberg
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2008
2:57 am

I agree with the comments on considering the source and hopefully their reputation is deserved. Basically the video, or media, itself is not to be trusted, its...
Caleb
calebjc
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2008
3:41 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help