Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
waa_advocacy · WAA Advocacy Committee
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 75 - 104 of 104   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#104 From: "Isaacson, Ben" <Ben.Isaacson@...>
Date: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:03 pm
Subject: WAA Advocacy Call: Wed. 7/25 @ 11:00 PST/2:00 EST
benisaacson
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

All,

Please join us for our next WAA Advocacy Call one week from today at 11:00 PST/2:00 EST. 

Call-in information: 
888-288-9321 (or 719-234-0201)
Participate passcode: 904248

Proposed Agenda items:

* Cookies discussions and their impact: Google Europe, Google-Doubleclick merger, recent Insight Express study: http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=64100&Nid=32364&p=289294

* Proposed 'Ethics Task Force' 

* FTC Behavioral Targeting 'Town Hall' meeting

* Pending Congressional Spyware laws


Please feel free to respond with other proposed discussion items to me or the full group list.

I look forward to our call. 

Best,

--Ben Isaacson


---------------------------
Privacy & Compliance Leader, CIPP
Experian Digital & Hitwise
Direct:  714-830-7253
ben.isaacson@...
475 Anton Blvd. Costa Mesa, CA 92626
---------------------------

 

 


#103 From: "rafoleyra" <rafoleyra@...>
Date: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:45 pm
Subject: Call for an Advocacy Co Chair
rafoleyra
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Would anyone be interested in helping Ben as the Advocacy Co-Chair for
the Advocacy Committee.

This can be very rewarding and an opportunity to work with great people
and influence the direction of the association and industry

if you are interested please contact me at
rfoley@...

#102 From: "crm_goddess" <dianthys@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2007 1:08 am
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's WAA Advocacy Call
crm_goddess
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Ben! I don't know how big this group is, but it would be really
helpful to send out invites to the conference calls via Outlook. Thanks.

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "benisaacson" <Ben.Isaacson@...>
wrote:
>
> I think we should have our scheduled call tomorrow to discuss whether
> the Googleclick privacy issues will impact our web analytics efforts.
>
> Please call-in at 10PST/1EST to:
>
> 641-985-1000 (227677#)
>
>
> Best,
>
> --Ben Isaacson
>

#101 From: "crm_goddess" <dianthys@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2007 1:07 am
Subject: Re: Study of Web Analysts job
crm_goddess
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
It's worth it to me if it's worth it to you. I can't wait to see your
findings. I took it and I'll have my staff take it as well just to
boost your results. That's 10 more right there!

Best of luck,
April Wilson
www.aprilwilson.net

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "Stephane Hamel" <shamel67@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> two weeks ago Avinash posted about "how should web analysts spend
> their day", and on my side, I've been talking about "attention". So
I
> took Avinash suggestion and the survey used to map out the types of
> attention being spent on a task (see www.attnco.com). The
combination
> of the two should give us a pretty good picture of the web analysts
> job, the time they spend on each type of activity, and if those are
> perceived as positive or negative tasks (and other attention
> characteristics).
>
> My problem is I don't have the reputation of Eric Peterson, so I
can't
> gather a thousand followers :) I only got about 30 survey
responses...
> I must admit the survey is a bit complex (I wanted to use the exact
> methodology from Attention Map) and the questions are directly taken
> from Avinash. I got about a hundred page views on the survey start,
55
> started it, including 28 completed.
>
> Despite the low response rate, I can already see some interesting
> results I could share.
>
> As "advocacies of WA", I would appreciate if you could take a look
at
> what I'm trying to accomplish, comment, bash or anything will be
> accepted :)
>
> If it's worth it, I will continue and ask for your support to
increase
> the number of respondents. Otherwise I will stop it there and
> summarize what I've found so far.
>
> Info:
> http://blog.immeria.net/2007/04/study-mapping-attention-of-web-
analysts.html
> First snapshot:
> http://blog.immeria.net/2007/04/study-first-results-are-in.html
> Survey: http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB226ELQBKLMS
> Avinash's post:
> http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2007/04/how-should-web-analysts-
spend-their-day.html
> The Attention company: http://attnco.com/
> Reference book: The Attention Economy, by Davenport & Beck
>
> Sincerely,
> Stéphane Hamel
> http://blog.immeria.net
>

#100 From: "Stephane Hamel" <shamel67@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2007 12:20 pm
Subject: Study of Web Analysts job
shamel67
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi everyone,
two weeks ago Avinash posted about "how should web analysts spend
their day", and on my side, I've been talking about "attention". So I
took Avinash suggestion and the survey used to map out the types of
attention being spent on a task (see www.attnco.com). The combination
of the two should give us a pretty good picture of the web analysts
job, the time they spend on each type of activity, and if those are
perceived as positive or negative tasks (and other attention
characteristics).

My problem is I don't have the reputation of Eric Peterson, so I can't
gather a thousand followers :) I only got about 30 survey responses...
I must admit the survey is a bit complex (I wanted to use the exact
methodology from Attention Map) and the questions are directly taken
from Avinash. I got about a hundred page views on the survey start, 55
started it, including 28 completed.

Despite the low response rate, I can already see some interesting
results I could share.

As "advocacies of WA", I would appreciate if you could take a look at
what I'm trying to accomplish, comment, bash or anything will be
accepted :)

If it's worth it, I will continue and ask for your support to increase
the number of respondents. Otherwise I will stop it there and
summarize what I've found so far.

Info:
http://blog.immeria.net/2007/04/study-mapping-attention-of-web-analysts.html
First snapshot:
http://blog.immeria.net/2007/04/study-first-results-are-in.html
Survey: http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?p=WEB226ELQBKLMS
Avinash's post:
http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2007/04/how-should-web-analysts-spend-their-day.h\
tml
The Attention company: http://attnco.com/
Reference book: The Attention Economy, by Davenport & Beck

Sincerely,
Stéphane Hamel
http://blog.immeria.net

#99 From: "benisaacson" <Ben.Isaacson@...>
Date: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:12 pm
Subject: Tomorrow's WAA Advocacy Call
benisaacson
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I think we should have our scheduled call tomorrow to discuss whether
the Googleclick privacy issues will impact our web analytics efforts.

Please call-in at 10PST/1EST to:

641-985-1000 (227677#)


Best,

--Ben Isaacson

#98 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:32 pm
Subject: Spyware legislation hearing on Thursday
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

FYI..

 

Spyware legislation has presented some issues for us in the past as they sometimes unintentionally include various web technologies which we use in their text.

 

The House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection will be holding a Spyware hearing tomorrow on H.R. 964, the text of the bill is available here: http://energycommerce.house.gov/privacy/HR_spyware.pdf

 

It is at 11:00 A.M. (EST). Streaming of the hearing is available from their web site at http://energycommerce.house.gov/

 

                                                                                                                                                                                -Jay-


#97 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:58 pm
Subject: FYI..
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
#96 From: Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
Date: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:02 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
jsterne
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Curtis -
This is really a great issue to post to the Yahoo Group:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/webanalytics/
All the best...

At 10:39 AM 1/18/2007, Curtis Tinsley, PhD, MD(H), MHA, FACHE wrote:

My intention to join your little group, learn about WAA and appropriately "advocate" the use and acceptance of clinical web analytics.  Perhaps I am in the wrong group.  Sorry for you time.

----- Original Message ----
From: "Curtis Tinsley, PhD, MD(H), MHA, FACHE" <dr_curtis_tinsley@...>
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 9:47:42 AM
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

Hey Jay,
 
Dr. Newbie here!  Well after days and weeks of 90 degree learning curves, I have produced my first web analytic report for a client hospital or should I say Integrated Delivery Network of (9) hospitals. You have to understand that I am transferring my Knowledge Base of Clinical Pathology to Cyber Pathology in eHealth.
 
The client wants to know if there is an industry standard for rate of growth for a web portal.  We at MEDSEEK term every Internet access point we deploy as a portal - more specifically I refer to them all as clinical portals within the hospital environment. The measurement( s) from WebTrends that I leveraged was NEW versus RETURNED visitors to the new enterprise portals. - right at six months old. (don't know what to do about the 29.76% of visitors who do not accept cookies)  Good, bad or indifferent the report looked "bitchen" and the information presented was a reasonable surrogate for "growth rate" of a new web site. Comparison reporting will follow using some of the our large client hospital networks.
 
My intended mission as a member of WAA and specifically for joining this Advocacy Group is to be educated daily, slip into your learning loop and try to establish a novel section specifically for eHealth, i.e., the deployment and integration of Internet technologies in clinical processes a.k.a. hospital web sites (inter & intra).
 
Sorry for the long wind here but this is my first Group encounter and I'm loaded with questions just keep the coffee pouring.
 
-Curt-
 
Curtis J. Tinsley, M.D.(H), Ph.D., M.H.A., CPHQ, FACHE (use credentials only once as introduction to Group)
MEDSEEK, eHealth Officer
"Taking the Art of Medicine to the Level of Science"

----- Original Message ----
From: Jay McCarthy <jmccarthy@websidest ory.com>
To: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: seth.romanow@ comcast.net; cdalessa@organic. com; richard.foley@ sas.com; andrea@netsetgo. com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ ichotelsgroup. com; civy@charter. net; greg.drew@webtrends .com; bryane@futurenowinc .com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:54:42 AM
Subject: RE: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 

From: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com [ mailto:waa_ advocacy@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: seth.romanow@ comcast.net; cdalessa@organic. com; richard.foley@ sas.com; andrea@netsetgo. com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ ichotelsgroup. com; civy@charter. net; greg.drew@webtrends .com; bryane@futurenowinc .com
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanaly ticsdemystified. com/web2group/ index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel. blogspot. com

--- In waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics .org
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting. com>
www.targeting. com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAss ociation. org



____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. yahoo.com



Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar
alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.

------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
       http://www.emetrics.org
Optimizing Online Marketing Value
         London, March 29-30
         Düsseldorf, April 17-18
        San Francisco, May 7-9
        Washington D.C., Oct 14-17
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org

#95 From: "Curtis Tinsley, PhD, MD\(H\), MHA, FACHE" <dr_curtis_tinsley@...>
Date: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
dr_curtis_ti...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
My intention to join your little group, learn about WAA and appropriately "advocate" the use and acceptance of clinical web analytics.  Perhaps I am in the wrong group.  Sorry for you time.

----- Original Message ----
From: "Curtis Tinsley, PhD, MD(H), MHA, FACHE" <dr_curtis_tinsley@...>
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2007 9:47:42 AM
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

Hey Jay,
 
Dr. Newbie here!  Well after days and weeks of 90 degree learning curves, I have produced my first web analytic report for a client hospital or should I say Integrated Delivery Network of (9) hospitals. You have to understand that I am transferring my Knowledge Base of Clinical Pathology to Cyber Pathology in eHealth.
 
The client wants to know if there is an industry standard for rate of growth for a web portal.  We at MEDSEEK term every Internet access point we deploy as a portal - more specifically I refer to them all as clinical portals within the hospital environment. The measurement( s) from WebTrends that I leveraged was NEW versus RETURNED visitors to the new enterprise portals. - right at six months old. (don't know what to do about the 29.76% of visitors who do not accept cookies)  Good, bad or indifferent the report looked "bitchen" and the information presented was a reasonable surrogate for "growth rate" of a new web site. Comparison reporting will follow using some of the our large client hospital networks.
 
My intended mission as a member of WAA and specifically for joining this Advocacy Group is to be educated daily, slip into your learning loop and try to establish a novel section specifically for eHealth, i.e., the deployment and integration of Internet technologies in clinical processes a.k.a. hospital web sites (inter & intra).
 
Sorry for the long wind here but this is my first Group encounter and I'm loaded with questions just keep the coffee pouring.
 
-Curt-
 
Curtis J. Tinsley, M.D.(H), Ph.D., M.H.A., CPHQ, FACHE (use credentials only once as introduction to Group)
MEDSEEK, eHealth Officer
"Taking the Art of Medicine to the Level of Science"

----- Original Message ----
From: Jay McCarthy <jmccarthy@websidest ory.com>
To: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: seth.romanow@ comcast.net; cdalessa@organic. com; richard.foley@ sas.com; andrea@netsetgo. com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ ichotelsgroup. com; civy@charter. net; greg.drew@webtrends .com; bryane@futurenowinc .com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:54:42 AM
Subject: RE: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 


From: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:waa_ advocacy@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: seth.romanow@ comcast.net; cdalessa@organic. com; richard.foley@ sas.com; andrea@netsetgo. com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ ichotelsgroup. com; civy@charter. net; greg.drew@webtrends .com; bryane@futurenowinc .com
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanaly ticsdemystified. com/web2group/ index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel. blogspot. com

--- In waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics .org
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting. com>
www.targeting. com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAss ociation. org



____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. yahoo.com



Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar
alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.

#94 From: "Curtis Tinsley, PhD, MD\(H\), MHA, FACHE" <dr_curtis_tinsley@...>
Date: Tue Jan 2, 2007 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
dr_curtis_ti...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hey Jay,
 
Dr. Newbie here!  Well after days and weeks of 90 degree learning curves, I have produced my first web analytic report for a client hospital or should I say Integrated Delivery Network of (9) hospitals. You have to understand that I am transferrring my Knowledge Base of Clinical Pathology to Cyber Pathology in eHealth.
 
The client wants to know if there is an industry standard for rate of growth for a web portal.  We at MEDSEEK term every Internet access point we deploy as a portal - more specifically I refer to them all as clinical portals within the hospital environment. The measurement(s) from WebTrends that I leveraged was NEW versus RETURNED visitors to the new enterprise portals. - right at six months old. (don't know what to do about the 29.76% of visitors who do not accept cookies)  Good, bad or indifferent the report looked "bitchen" and the information presented was a reasonable surrogate for "growth rate" of a new web site. Comparison reporting will follow using some of the our large client hospital networks.
 
My intended mission as a member of WAA and specifically for joining this Advocacy Group is to be educated daily, slip into your learning loop and try to establish a novel section specifically for eHealth, i.e., the deployment and integration of Internet technologies in clinical processes a.k.a. hospital web sites (inter & intra).
 
Sorry for the long wind here but this is my first Group encounter and I'm loaded with questions just keep the coffee pouring.
 
-Curt-
 
Curtis J. Tinsley, M.D.(H), Ph.D., M.H.A., CPHQ, FACHE (use credentials only once as introduction to Group)
MEDSEEK, eHealth Officer
"Taking the Art of Medicine to the Level of Science"

----- Original Message ----
From: Jay McCarthy <jmccarthy@...>
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Cc: seth.romanow@...; cdalessa@...; richard.foley@...; andrea@...; Shubhra.Srivastava@...; civy@...; greg.drew@...; bryane@...
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:54:42 AM
Subject: RE: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 


From: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:waa_ advocacy@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com
Cc: seth.romanow@ comcast.net; cdalessa@organic. com; richard.foley@ sas.com; andrea@netsetgo. com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ ichotelsgroup. com; civy@charter. net; greg.drew@webtrends .com; bryane@futurenowinc .com
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanaly ticsdemystified. com/web2group/ index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel. blogspot. com

--- In waa_advocacy@ yahoogroups. com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics .org
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting. com>
www.targeting. com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAss ociation. org



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#93 From: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:13 pm
Subject: New poll for waa_advocacy
waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the
waa_advocacy group:

What is the target(s) for your web analytics practice?

   o web analytics - Healthcare
   o web analytics - IT
   o web analytics - Marketing
   o web analytics - Human Resources
   o web analytics - Other
   o predictive web analytics - Healthcare
   o predictive web analytics
   o do not use web analytics


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/waa_advocacy/surveys?id=2403204

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.

Thanks!

#92 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Subject: Some recent articles
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

FYI, a few articles on privacy related issues.

 

http://www.dmnews.com/cms/dm-news/shows-assns/38994.html

 

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2006/tc20061115_360862.htm

 

-------

Jay McCarthy

Co-Chair WAA Advocacy Committee

 


#91 From: "Chris Clark" <chris.clark@...>
Date: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:38 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
chrisclarkgold
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Well, I’ve spent the weekend in Web 2.0 cyberspace, and in addition to ‘hot topic’ and ‘diversified media’ I might add the words ‘intuitively muddled.’

 

For example:

-          opening up accounts in blogging software is a newbie nightmare

-          Getting ready to post your first article on Newsvine

-          Figuring out the measure of your reputation on del.icio.us was other people’s bookmarking you, when you started out innocently thinking it was just a convenient labour saving web book marker for yourself

 

So maybe a good place to start might be by us collectively developing intuitive and web-journey guidance to offer to Web 2.0 tech builders, whilst figuring out how to develop integrated metrics from a variety of paths, touchpoints, and report variations. 

 

Maybe Technology would be fine for that, with intuitive guidance as part of the brief?

 

Thoughts/comments/opinions?

 

Chris

 

=================================================================

Clark Marketing Ltd

Chris Clark, Managing Director

Email to:  chris.clark@...

161 Cornwall Road, Ruislip, Middx, HA4 6AG

Tel:  01895 623 845

URL:  http://www.clarkmarketing.co.uk

     “Internet profit without pain”.

=================================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Sterne [mailto:jsterne@...]
Sent: 12 November 2006 20:47
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com; waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Cc: seth.romanow@...; cdalessa@...; richard.foley@...; andrea@...; Shubhra.Srivastava@...; civy@...; greg.drew@...; bryane@...
Subject: RE: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Ahhh - but we abolished that a while ago.
Any reason to bring it back? Or should we
foster "working groups" as Eric has called his?

At 08:54 AM 11/12/2006, Jay McCarthy wrote:

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 


From: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Cc: seth.romanow@comcast.net; cdalessa@organic.com; richard.foley@sas.com; andrea@netsetgo.com; Shubhra.Srivastava@ichotelsgroup.com; civy@charter.net; greg.drew@webtrends.com; bryane@futurenowinc.com
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:


This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/web2group/index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel.blogspot.com

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>



------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting.com>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org


------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting.com>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org


#90 From: Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
Date: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:46 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
jsterne
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Ahhh - but we abolished that a while ago.
Any reason to bring it back? Or should we
foster "working groups" as Eric has called his?

At 08:54 AM 11/12/2006, Jay McCarthy wrote:

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 

From: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Cc: seth.romanow@...; cdalessa@...; richard.foley@...; andrea@...; Shubhra.Srivastava@...; civy@...; greg.drew@...; bryane@...
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/web2group/index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel.blogspot.com

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org


------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org

#89 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:54 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

In my view this is not a topic for the advocacy committee rather perhaps the technology committee.

 

                                                                                                                                    -Jay-

 


From: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Sterne
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:36 PM
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Cc: seth.romanow@...; cdalessa@...; richard.foley@...; andrea@...; Shubhra.Srivastava@...; civy@...; greg.drew@...; bryane@...
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince

 

Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/web2group/index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel.blogspot.com

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting.com>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org


#88 From: Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
Date: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:36 am
Subject: Re: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
jsterne
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Any reason Eric is doing this, rather than the WAA?

At 06:36 AM 11/11/2006, Stephane Hamel wrote:

This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/web2group/index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel.blogspot.com

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>


------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture
Optimizing Online Marketing Value

London, March 29-30, 2007
Düsseldorf, April 17-18, 2007
San Francisco, May 7-9, 2007
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
www.targeting.com +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org

#87 From: "Stephane Hamel" <shamel67@...>
Date: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
shamel67
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
This is a hot topic and a working group led by Eric Peterson is
looking into it. There is a diversity of media and medium in the Web
2.0 sphere, which makes it more complex to measure than if it was only
pure HTML viewed in a browser.

There seems to be a consensus that "page view" is not the good unit of
measure anymore... I sugested, based on post I had seen a long time
ago, "meaningful user event" but the question remains: how to measure it!

Check out http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/web2group/index.asp
on Eric Peteron's site for more info about the working group.

S.Hamel
http://shamel.blogspot.com

--- In waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com, "mokatia" <mokatia@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
> wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
> in a web 2.0 world.
>
> mostafa
>

#86 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:29 pm
Subject: Article: TRUSTe launches software privacy certification
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

FYI..

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

TRUSTe Launches Software Privacy Certification

 

By Anick Jesdanun

NewsFactor Network

November 9, 2006

 

URL:  http://www.newsfactor.com/news/TRUSTe-Launches-Privacy-Certification/story.xhtml?story_id=0210023DPTEC

 

An organization that monitors Web site privacy and e-mail practices for businesses has launched an initiative to certify advertising software as consumer-friendly and non-invasive.

The idea behind the Trusted Download Program is to create a list of acceptable applications to help companies like Time Warner Inc.'s AOL, Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. make decisions about where to advertise and with whom to partner.

The program covers software used for advertising or tracking user behavior. Certified adware and other software must obtain consent before downloading, be easy to uninstall and cannot modify computer settings to cause damage or harm.

Yahoo is among the major Internet companies that have been accused in the past of benefiting from adware companies with questionable installation practices. The company has said the certifications could prove useful in determining whether to make Yahoo's search results available to other companies as a component of their toolbars and other software products.

TRUSTe had announced the program late last year. Last week marked the opening of submissions, though the program remains in a test phase. TRUSTe is requiring participants of its regular certification programs to submit their applications to the Trusted Download Program before renewing their seals.

"Advertisers now can demand that their brand advertising is displayed only in software that is certified by Trusted Download," Ari Schwartz, deputy


#85 From: "Jessica Hoffman" <jessica@...>
Date: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:03 pm
Subject: Hello fellow members!
globalexecus...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Thanks for the invite! I just wanted to say hello to everyone- I will have some very interesting jobs coming up in the near future at all levels- SAP, IT, SEO, Product managers and User Experience… If anyone is interested in finding out more, please let me know!! All of my contact info is below. If you would like me to post these as they come up please let me know. I don’t want to waste time if everyone will just be bored or annoyed by job postings in this group- so I will not do anything unless I hear that this is desired! J

Have a great day, everyone!!

Sincerely,

Jessica

 

Jessica Hoffman

Global ExecuSearch

215.774.1523

www.globalexecusearch.com

info@...

http://www.linkedin.com/in/globalexecusearch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

Global ExecuSearch  PO Box 30211 Elkins Park Pa www.globalexecusearch.com

 

 

 

 

 


#84 From: "mokatia" <mokatia@...>
Date: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:11 am
Subject: Web 2.0 and PVs, User Experince
mokatia
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,
I'm here in San Francisco attending the web 2.0 conference and i was
wondering how can we accomodate and accurtly measure the user experince
in a web 2.0 world.

mostafa

#83 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Thu Nov 9, 2006 2:34 pm
Subject: FW: [nai-announce] FW: [CDT Supporters] Complaint to FTC on Behavioral Targeting
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

FYI..

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Harris

Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:34 AM
To: supporters@...
Subject: [CDT Supporters] Complaint to FTC on Behavioral Targeting

 

Dear CDT supporters:

 

Last week, a group called the Center for Digital Democracy ("CDD")

joined with the U.S. Public Interest Research Group("PIRG")  to file

a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission calling for an

investigation into the "behavioral targeting " practices of a number

of major Internet companies.

 

I want to clarify that the Center for Democracy & Technology is not

associated in any way with the complaint. Some of our colleagues,

understandably confused by the similarity between our name and that

of the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), have asked us about our

involvement with the complaint. Matters were further confused when a

popular news site mentioned CDT's name in a story about the report.

 

We are reviewing the complaint and do have  questions about the

accuracy of some of the  specific allegations. We do  however believe

that the advent of more sophisticated  behavioral targeting

techniques  is an area of growing concern for consumers.  Practices

have changed dramatically since the FTC last had workshops on the

topic,  and we would support  another set of workshops on the

subject. CDT is also interested in convening a group to discuss best

practices in this rapidly developing area.

 

We look forward to working with you all on these emerging privacy challenges.

 

Leslie Harris

 

--

Leslie Harris

Executive Director

Center for Democracy and Technology


Do not reply to this message. Replies go only to the sender and are not distributed to the list.

To unsubscribe from this list, or change the email address where you receive messages, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=3378431&user_secret=0a6eb26f


#82 From: "Isaacson, Ben" <Ben.Isaacson@...>
Date: Fri Nov 3, 2006 8:08 pm
Subject: First Crack at WAAAA! Introduction
benisaacson
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
At Jay's gentle reminder, I pulled together a quick introduction to get the ball rolling on a regular series of alerts on clickstream-cookie uses.   I know it's a bit goofy, but I really like the WAAAA! as the title as it does convey what most people think of when they think of our topics.  I also kept the content short and the tone of the brief light to raise the interest level. 
 
Just to be clear; this is not a response to the CDD report. I've known the guy who issued that alert for a while and I genuinely believe he is smoking his own form of crack.  Thankfully, no one in the beltway really takes him seriously.   I think our best approach to him is let it die down.  In my opinion, we have our mission and focus and we should stick to it. 
 
I think we should schedule a make-up call to discuss this and a couple of other agenda items that have been proposed to the group sometime soon. I'll default to Jay to schedule, but the week after next might be good to debrief from the FTC event as well.
 
Thoughts?
 
Best,
 
Ben
 
 
 
 

#81 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:31 pm
Subject: No call today
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Everyone,

 

There’s no call today as I have a conflict. I’ll try and schedule a call for the next week or two to make up for this though.

 

                                                                                                -Jay-


#80 From: Andrew Edwards <aedwards@...>
Date: Wed Aug 9, 2006 6:11 pm
Subject: Re: More on the AOL Story
andrewedward...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I saw that and am amzed that AOL could have been so stupid (perhaps I
shouldn't be).

Jay McCarthy wrote:

> FYI..
>
>
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?ei=5090&en=f6f61949c6da4\
d38&ex=1312776000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
>
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?ei=5090&en=f6f61949c6da\
4d38&ex=1312776000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Jay McCarthy*
> Vice President of Business Development
>
>
>
> WebSideStory, Inc. <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>
> Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
> Fax:    (858) 546.0480
>
> skype: jmccarthy_wss
>
>  *Professional Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a24/409>*
> email: jay@... <mailto:jay@...>
>
>
>
> 10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
> San Diego, CA 92121
> www.websidestory.com <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>
> WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics
>
> <http://promo.websidestory.com/wssig/marketing/>
>
>
>
>
>
>



--
Andrew Edwards
Managing Partner
Technology Leaders
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
(212) 808-3058
Cell: (917) 602-0083
aedwards@...
www.technologyleaders.com

#79 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Wed Aug 9, 2006 5:57 pm
Subject: More on the AOL Story
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

FYI..

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?ei=5090&en=f6f61949c6da4d38&ex=1312776000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

 

 

 

Jay McCarthy
Vice President of Business Development

WebSideStory, Inc.

Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
Fax:    (858) 546.0480

skype: jmccarthy_wss

 Professional Profile
email:
jay@...

10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
San Diego, CA 92121
www.websidestory.com

WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics

 

 


#78 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Tue Aug 8, 2006 2:50 pm
Subject: RE: FYI..
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Doesn’t really qualify as a web analytics issue directly, however it seems pretty clear that this was a careless handling of some pretty sensitive data. If it were possible to completely anonymize the data perhaps it would be ok, but I don’t think the technology exists that could ensure that all the personal references are taken out.

 

It is certainly a huge faux pas by AOL to not review this data before releasing it. As for the related issue of all of these search engines releasing this data along with PII (in cases where they have it like AOL) or IP address. I’m curious to everyone’s thoughts on that. Where does the group sit on the balance of security vs privacy and is it alright for the government to have this data?

 

                                                                                                                                                -Jay-

 


From: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 6:29 AM
To: waa_advocacy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [waa_advocacy] FYI..

 

Looks like a genuine data nightmare. . .what position does WAA advocacy
take on this?

Jim Sterne wrote:

> This isn't quite - but almost what Bob Page
> meant when he talked about a "Data Chernobyl"
> This is the sort of thing that could cause legislators
> to rise out of their graves and wander, zombie-like
> across the landscape of privacy.
>
>
> At 11:26 AM 8/7/2006, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Jay McCarthy*
>> Vice President of Business Development
>>
>> WebSideStory, Inc. <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>>
>> Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
>> Fax: (858) 546.0480
>>
>> skype: jmccarthy_wss
>>
>> [] *Professional Profile* <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a24/409>
>> email: jay@websidestory.com <mailto:jay@websidestory.com>
>>
>> 10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
>> San Diego, CA 92121
>> www.websidestory.com <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>>
>> WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics
>>
>> <http://promo.websidestory.com/wssig/marketing/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> *Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture - 2006
> *Optimizing Online Marketing Value
> Washington D.C., October 16-18
> http://www.emetrics.org
> <http://www.emetrics.org/>-----------------------------------------------------
> Emetrics Summit 2007: San Francisco, London, Munich....
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Jim Sterne <jsterne@targeting.com>
> www.targeting.com <http://www.targeting.com/> +1-805-965-3184
> President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org
> <http://www.webanalyticsassociation.org/>

--
Andrew Edwards
Managing Partner
Technology Leaders
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
(212) 808-3058
Cell: (917) 602-0083
aedwards@technologyleaders.com


#77 From: Andrew Edwards <aedwards@...>
Date: Tue Aug 8, 2006 1:29 pm
Subject: Re: FYI..
andrewedward...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Looks like a genuine data nightmare. . .what position does WAA advocacy
take on this?

Jim Sterne wrote:

> This isn't quite - but almost what Bob Page
> meant when he talked about a "Data Chernobyl"
> This is the sort of thing that could cause legislators
> to rise out of their graves and wander, zombie-like
> across the landscape of privacy.
>
>
> At 11:26 AM 8/7/2006, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-use\
r-search-data/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Jay McCarthy*
>> Vice President of Business Development
>>
>> WebSideStory, Inc. <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>>
>> Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
>> Fax:    (858) 546.0480
>>
>> skype: jmccarthy_wss
>>
>> []  *Professional Profile* <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a24/409>
>> email: jay@... <mailto:jay@...>
>>
>> 10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
>> San Diego, CA 92121
>> www.websidestory.com <http://www.websidestory.com/>
>>
>> WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics
>>
>> <http://promo.websidestory.com/wssig/marketing/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> *Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture - 2006
> *Optimizing Online Marketing Value
> Washington D.C., October 16-18
> http://www.emetrics.org
>
<http://www.emetrics.org/>-----------------------------------------------------
> Emetrics Summit 2007: San Francisco, London, Munich....
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
> www.targeting.com <http://www.targeting.com/>   +1-805-965-3184
> President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org
> <http://www.webanalyticsassociation.org/>



--
Andrew Edwards
Managing Partner
Technology Leaders
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
(212) 808-3058
Cell: (917) 602-0083
aedwards@...

#76 From: Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
Date: Tue Aug 8, 2006 1:46 am
Subject: Re: FYI..
jsterne
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
This isn't quite - but almost what Bob Page
meant when he talked about a "Data Chernobyl"
This is the sort of thing that could cause legislators
to rise out of their graves and wander, zombie-like
across the landscape of privacy.


At 11:26 AM 8/7/2006, Jay McCarthy wrote:

 

http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/

 

 

Jay McCarthy
Vice President of Business Development

WebSideStory, Inc.

Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
Fax:    (858) 546.0480

skype: jmccarthy_wss

[]  Professional Profile
email:
jay@...

10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
San Diego, CA 92121
www.websidestory.com

WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics



 

 

------------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit, The Big Picture - 2006
Optimizing Online Marketing Value
Washington D.C., October 16-18
http://www.emetrics.org
-----------------------------------------------------
Emetrics Summit 2007: San Francisco, London, Munich....
-----------------------------------------------------
Jim Sterne <jsterne@...>
www.targeting.com   +1-805-965-3184
President, www.WebAnalyticsAssociation.org

#75 From: "Jay McCarthy" <jmccarthy@...>
Date: Mon Aug 7, 2006 6:26 pm
Subject: FYI..
jmccarthy_waa
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/

 

 

Jay McCarthy
Vice President of Business Development

WebSideStory, Inc.

Office: (858) 546.0040 ext.366
Fax:    (858) 546.0480

skype: jmccarthy_wss

 Professional Profile
email:
jay@...

10182 Telesis Court, 6th Floor
San Diego, CA 92121
www.websidestory.com

WebSideStory - On-Demand Web Analytics

 

 


Messages 75 - 104 of 104   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help