Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
warpedusers · Warped Users - Advocates of OS/2 Warp in all its forms
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 316 - 369 of 371   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#369 From: "Monila D'silva" <monadsilva@...>
Date: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:39 pm
Subject: new version of JPhotoBrush Pro
monadsilva
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
hi all,
just to let you know, JPhotoBrush Pro 1.3
(http://www.jphotobrushpro.com) has been released and being a java
based program it runs in OS/2.

Note from the author:
"This is an Award Winning Multi-Platform Image
Editing/Enhancement/Retouch Application written in Java offering
various filters, effects and transformation with user friendly
interface. Offering a wide range of adjustment for most effects, you
will find many features not found on expensive commercial editors.
JPhotoBrush Pro, has been successfully tested in Windows
(9x/NT/2000/XP), Linux, OS/2, Mac machines .
The new version also includes a GIF Animation Wizard called
JPhotoAnim, Exif Support and a tool called JPhotoBatch which allow
batch processing like renaming / resizing (including generating
thumbnails) / format(file type) change of multiple image files in a
directory at the click of the mouse."

But I must warn you it is a bit resource hungry (like most Java
apps), so make sure you havea good CPU speed and RAM.

#368 From: "Gary Litzkow <glitzkow@...>" <glitzkow@...>
Date: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:56 pm
Subject: Newbie needs lots of help getting going........
scarygary_67
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I am new to the NON-BORG os environment. I guess you could say I am
just beginning to become De-Assimilated !

I'm just concerned that I will have perpetual trouble with apps and
incompatible files.

So, I guess I will be asking a lot of what would seem to be "Dumb
Questions".

Hope this group gets going well.....

I will also have to join the Linux community as well!

Happy Non-BORG computing!

Gary.

#367 From: "G J Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Wed Dec 18, 2002 11:17 am
Subject: Re: CD bootable/installable
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On 17 Dec 2002, madodel  wrote:

> Try the VOICE Newsletter master Index page for articles on bootable
> and
> UpdCD http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/vnlindex.html

> Build your own version of OS/2 with UpdCD
> http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/VNL0502H/vnewsf4.htm

> How to create a [complete] OS/2 system bootable off a CD-ROM
> http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/VNL0700H/vnewsf2.htm

Mark,

Thank you for this excellent post.  It has helped me with several
other things, other than boot-from-CD.

The DIAZ article has:

link - INI2Rexx.CMD - 500 Internal Server Error, returned at
1:45-2:00 am MST

link - just before the "Things I've added...etc" topic heading,
the CONFIG.SYS link and the FILES LIST link are swapped (i.e. the
FILES LIST downloads the CONFIG.SYS and visa versa).

......gregy

PS...In your group membership settings, if you have the "Hide my
IP and EMAIL from the moderators" checked, this would stop you
from posting via email..
PPS..I could not find the membername "madodel" on the members list.
Could this be causing the problem...??

-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client

#366 From: madodel
Date: Tue Dec 17, 2002 1:50 am
Subject: Re: CD bootable/installable
madodel
Offline Offline
 
--- In warpedusers@yahoogroups.com, boonognog <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a machine at home that has a bad floppy controller, and I
was
> wondering, before I go into efforts to get it working (since there
is
> not much need for it anymore!), if anyone has run across or used
any
> software that creates a bootable CD out of the original Warp 4 CD.
>
> As I said, my machine at home has a 3.5" drive with "issues", so I
> can't use anything that requires the use of that drive... I have
> found some things that would work, if my floppy drive also worked.
> But, alas...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> -Tim

God I hate Yahoo.  Won;t let me post by email.  And I changed the
stupid profile.  Anyway here is the reply I sent several times to the
list:

Try the VOICE Newsletter master Index page for articles on bootable
and
UpdCD http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/vnlindex.html

Build your own version of OS/2 with UpdCD
http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/VNL0502H/vnewsf4.htm

How to create a [complete] OS/2 system bootable off a CD-ROM
http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_issues/VNL0700H/vnewsf2.htm

Mark

#365 From: boonognog
Date: Mon Dec 16, 2002 9:49 pm
Subject: CD bootable/installable
boonognog
Offline Offline
 
Hello All,

I have a machine at home that has a bad floppy controller, and I was
wondering, before I go into efforts to get it working (since there is
not much need for it anymore!), if anyone has run across or used any
software that creates a bootable CD out of the original Warp 4 CD.

As I said, my machine at home has a 3.5" drive with "issues", so I
can't use anything that requires the use of that drive... I have
found some things that would work, if my floppy drive also worked.
But, alas...

Any ideas?

-Tim

#364 From: "G J Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Fri Dec 13, 2002 1:36 am
Subject: Re: End of the Line
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, jpasnak wrote:

> http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_902-274

> Effective March 12, 2003, IBM will withdraw from marketing the part
> numbers licensed under the IBM International Program License Agreement
> (IPLA) listed in the Program Withdrawals section.

> On or after that date, you can no longer obtain these part numbers directly
> from IBM. You can obtain these part numbers on an as-available basis
> through IBM authorized remarketers.

Glad you spotted that...I must have missed the announcment among
my other spam.....<g g g>

Looks like all the Warp 4 versions, and before are "last year's
model".......officially...<g g g>...

I have the MCPs, haven't made a big effort to make them my permanent
installs...just made sure the CDs would load/read/install....but..
someday (<g g g g>....).

This won't stop me from helping newbies get their toes wet trying
OS/2...as far as I'm concerned, the biggest "IBM authorized
remarketer" is eBay......<g g g g>....most of my newbies get their
Warp 3s on there...

.....gregy


-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client

#363 From: martiniturbide1
Date: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:30 pm
Subject: Re: End of the line...
martiniturbide1
Offline Offline
 
Not yet:

IBM: OS/2 Alive And Well

...an IBM spokesman said OS/2 is alive and well. "Really, not very
much has changed," the spokesman said. "We are continuing to support
OS/2, just as we always have."...

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,763064,00.asp



IBM: OS/2 still sold here

...IBM spokesman Steve Eisenstadt said. "As long as our customers want
OS/2, we will support them," he said. "We don't have plans to withdraw
OS/2."...

http://marketwatch-cnet.com.com/2100-1001-977087.html
and
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-977087.html


Martin

#362 From: jpasnak
Date: Thu Dec 12, 2002 4:29 am
Subject: End of the line...
jpasnak
Offline Offline
 
http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_902-274

Effective March 12, 2003, IBM will withdraw from marketing the part
numbers licensed under the IBM International Program License Agreement
(IPLA) listed in the Program Withdrawals section.


On or after that date, you can no longer obtain these part numbers directly
from IBM. You can obtain these part numbers on an as-available basis
through IBM authorized remarketers.

#361 From: "Sini=b9a_Pavlovi=e6" <sinip@...>
Date: Sun Nov 24, 2002 12:22 am
Subject: Re: [Warped Users] Re: Change to "Restricted" group
sinip2001
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
** Reply to message from "G J Feig" <gfeig@...> on Thu, 21 Nov 2002
23:05:58 -0700

> > group.  That way, you don't have to "restrict" group membership, just
> > monitor the first few posts of any new user.  But, whatever works for
> > you.  Good luck.
>
> Thanks for your input.  Any other thoughts on this..??  From the
> other members...??

Go for it!

--
Pozdrav iz Doboja, Republika Srpska

#360 From: "G J Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Fri Nov 22, 2002 6:05 am
Subject: Re: Change to "Restricted" group
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On 21 Nov 2002, "Scott" <stjen@...> wrote:

> If I may suggest -- after you've removed the "trash" users from
> membership, the optimum setting is to make sure that All Posts from
> New Users are Moderated, usually as an automatic override.  Once
> you've observed the first few posts from a new group member, if they
> seem reasonably on topic, you can remove the restriction from them
> and they'll be unmoderated.  But for all of the spammer trash,
> they'll join and their first posts will be trash, which you'll get --
> you then reject their post, and remove and/or ban them from the
> group.  That way, you don't have to "restrict" group membership, just
> monitor the first few posts of any new user.  But, whatever works for
> you.  Good luck.

Thanks for your input.  Any other thoughts on this..??  From the
other members...??

....gregy


-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client

#359 From: "Scott" <stjen@...>
Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 5:17 am
Subject: Re: Change to "Restricted" group
stjen
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In warpedusers@y..., "G J FEIG" <gfeig@h...> wrote:
> Pasnak and I discussed this.  The spammer jerks were
> even getting past a daily check by me.  So he has
> changed the group to "restricted" which only means
> that he or I need to click on a link to approve or
> disapprove.
>
> This should not slow any REAL user down, who wants to
> join and post valid messages.

If I may suggest -- after you've removed the "trash" users from
membership, the optimum setting is to make sure that All Posts from
New Users are Moderated, usually as an automatic override.  Once
you've observed the first few posts from a new group member, if they
seem reasonably on topic, you can remove the restriction from them
and they'll be unmoderated.  But for all of the spammer trash,
they'll join and their first posts will be trash, which you'll get --
you then reject their post, and remove and/or ban them from the
group.  That way, you don't have to "restrict" group membership, just
monitor the first few posts of any new user.  But, whatever works for
you.  Good luck.

#358 From: "Sini=b9a_Pavlovi=e6" <sinip@...>
Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 7:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Warped Users] Faxworks/2
sinip2001
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
** Reply to message from "G J FEIG" <gfeig@...> on Wed, 20 Nov 2002
02:35:39 -0000

> A german friend of mine is just getting his toes
> wet with Warp 3 (RedSpine).
>
> He wants to try to use Faxworks/2 from the Bonuspak.
>
> Does Faxworks/2 work..??  He only wants non-fancy,
> generic faxing.
>
> If it's not worth messing with, are there alternatives.?

Works good here, Warp 4 FP15. Really nice, simple and does the job the way it
should.

--
Pozdrav iz Doboja, Republika Srpska

#357 From: "G J FEIG" <gfeig@...>
Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 2:35 am
Subject: Faxworks/2
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
A german friend of mine is just getting his toes
wet with Warp 3 (RedSpine).

He wants to try to use Faxworks/2 from the Bonuspak.

Does Faxworks/2 work..??  He only wants non-fancy,
generic faxing.

If it's not worth messing with, are there alternatives.?

....gregy

#356 From: "G J FEIG" <gfeig@...>
Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 2:29 am
Subject: Change to "Restricted" group
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Pasnak and I discussed this.  The spammer jerks were
even getting past a daily check by me.  So he has
changed the group to "restricted" which only means
that he or I need to click on a link to approve or
disapprove.

This should not slow any REAL user down, who wants to
join and post valid messages.

If this offends any of you, please let pasnak or me
know.

I don't want the group to die from being smothered
in sewage, and that is what this spammer seems to
be trying to do.

I have received some good help here, and I am
introducing some newbies to Warp and want a place
for them and me to ask "newbies/dummies" type
questions.  We have some outstanding OS2ers on
this list, so the help is here, and it would be a
shame to let the group die.

....feig

#354 From: "G J Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Mon Nov 11, 2002 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: Back in business
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, caluser2000 wrote:

> Was geeting a bit worried is group had been left to the spammers.
> Glad to see it's been cleaned up.

> Mark

Didn't want to let it die...it is a convenient place to ask "newbie"
questions...and "dummy" (me) questions.......<g g  g>

....gregy

#353 From: caluser2000
Date: Sun Nov 10, 2002 10:36 pm
Subject: Re: Back in business
caluser2000
Offline Offline
 
Was geeting a bit worried is group had been left to the spammers.
Glad to see it's been cleaned up.

Mark

--- In warpedusers@y..., "G J FEIG" <gfeig@h...> wrote:
> Okay...Pasnak clean out the spam and deleted most of
> the phoney mambers.  I cleaned out a couple of others.
> I will try to keep a daily watch on it.  I get the
> daily digest, so if someone sneaks in and posts a
> spam, I might not catch it until that night.
> But, we still want this to be an opened group, and
> no delay on posting, so something might occasionally
> sneak thru.
>
> .....feig

#352 From: "G J FEIG" <gfeig@...>
Date: Thu Nov 7, 2002 11:04 pm
Subject: Back in business
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Okay...Pasnak clean out the spam and deleted most of
the phoney mambers.  I cleaned out a couple of others.
I will try to keep a daily watch on it.  I get the
daily digest, so if someone sneaks in and posts a
spam, I might not catch it until that night.
But, we still want this to be an opened group, and
no delay on posting, so something might occasionally
sneak thru.

.....feig

#351 From: "G J Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Wed Oct 30, 2002 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: This group is now a waste -- where's the moderator
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On 30 Oct 2002, jpasnak  wrote:

> I've been out of the loop for the last two months.   I've let alot of things
> go off to the side, this site being one of them.   Anyone who wants to be a
> moderator, let me know.....

> J.P. Pasnak

I'm in the midst of a move, but I'm already moderating a couple
of other groups....they don't take too much effort.  If noone else
wants to do it, then you can let me...at least until you get your
self settled down, again..

.....gregy


-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/

#350 From: jpasnak
Date: Wed Oct 30, 2002 7:14 am
Subject: Re: This group is now a waste -- where's the moderator
jpasnak
Offline Offline
 
I've been out of the loop for the last two months.   I've let alot of things
go off to the side, this site being one of them.   Anyone who wants to be a
moderator, let me know.....

J.P. Pasnak

--- In warpedusers@y..., "Scott" <stjen@a...> wrote:
> I attach a list of the last month's postings to this group:
> >
> Otherwise, if you're abandoning the group, tell us -- maybe you'll
> find someone to take the reins, or maybe it's just time to kill the
> group -- there are a lot of other Warp OS/2 groups around, including
> the eCS groups, so it's not as if we're going to be homeless for
> long.  Just let us know, OK?  Thanks.
>
>           -- Scott  (Warp User for many years)

#341 From: "Scott" <stjen@...>
Date: Sat Sep 28, 2002 5:37 pm
Subject: This group is now a waste -- where's the moderator
stjen
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I attach a list of the last month's postings to this group:

324  check this site out!…  fbdhffhjz  fbdhffhjz  Mon  8/12/2002    2
KB
325  New Pics Here...  rpcnipgrbm  rpcnipgrbm  Wed  8/21/2002    2
KB
328  Check This Site Out!  s3om8o6qsi  s3om8o6qsi  Mon  8/26/2002
2 KB
329  New Pictures  s3om8o6qsi  s3om8o6qsi  Fri  8/30/2002    2 KB
330  Just Found The Best Site!  gzpdbfaeqc  gzpdbfaeqc  Sat
8/31/2002    2 KB
331  New Website Here  axlqdzzdylfh  axlqdzzdylfh  Fri  9/6/2002    2
KB
332  Check This Site Out!  bklymrfwgxnk  bklymrfwgxnk  Tue
9/10/2002    2 KB
333  new site here...  dtsuanagupaq  dtsuanagupaq  Sat  9/14/2002
2 KB
334  check this out!  efqzqefrtucl  efqzqefrtucl  Mon  9/16/2002    2
KB
335  just found a new website here..  fqpccnoxsttl  fqpccnoxsttl
Fri  9/20/2002    2 KB
336  check this site out!  gcvzbcxnoybk  gcvzbcxnoybk  Sat
9/21/2002    2 KB
337  new pictures uploaded...  hazqduckmrhc  hazqduckmrhc  Sun
9/22/2002    2 KB
338  great website here  gpobwpulvmte  gpobwpulvmte  Wed
9/25/2002    2 KB
339  new pictures uploaded..  hnjapblprbnv  hnjapblprbnv  Thu
9/26/2002    2 KB
340  check this site out!  hzpgquejygyc  hzpgquejygyc  Fri
9/27/2002    2 KB

Mr. Moderator -- don't you monitor your group anymore?  Every one of
these postings for the past month has come from some random idiot who
creates a garbage Yahoo account, posts some spam to the list, then
either leaves the group or abandons the id.  (I do notice that some
of the ids apparently still live in the Members list.)  Minimally,
all of these IDs should be Banned from membership, and all of the
posts deleted from the archive.  Further, you should really make sure
that the settings of the group are to Moderate New Members -- that
way, you'll see any posting from someone who just joins, and you can
either toss it (and them) if all they're doing is posting trash, or
you can decide if they appear to be a real person who truly wants to
be a part of this group.  (Then you can turn off the moderation on
them.)

Otherwise, if you're abandoning the group, tell us -- maybe you'll
find someone to take the reins, or maybe it's just time to kill the
group -- there are a lot of other Warp OS/2 groups around, including
the eCS groups, so it's not as if we're going to be homeless for
long.  Just let us know, OK?  Thanks.

           -- Scott  (Warp User for many years)

#327 From: "Gregory J. Feig" <gfeig@...>
Date: Fri Aug 23, 2002 1:35 pm
Subject: re: OS-2 Newbie.......
gjfeig
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, "scarygary_67" <glitzkow@...> wrote:

> I am so very new to the world of computing outside of BORG influence!
> I will need lots of help in my challenge of de-assimilation!

-----------snip------------------
> made for my OS-2 Warp 3. Alas, this IBM stuff needs some special
> support to upgrade to more memory and other stuff. This tower just
> sits there, waiting for me to do something with it! Anyone here have
> any original 72 pin parity IBM ram sticks they don't need anymore? I
> need four 8meg sticks that are guaranteed to work in this thing. What
> I have is the PS/2 Ultimedia mini tower that is decked out with all
> sorts of niceties, including a wicked nice multisync video card, and
> imbedded audio that screams.

Gary,

You might start by looking at Kahlon...they have had a fairly wide
selection of PS/2 and general IBM parts, for years..
http://www.kahlon.com/

Then, you might look at
http://www.simmtester.com/
and go look in their sort of "fleamarket" swap/sell area....there
have been some real deals on there, occasionally.

Then, go check
http://www.computersurplusoutlet.com/

and
http://www.hitechcafe.com/

For information...the IBM sites, both HTTP and FTP have gadzoodles of
information...it sometimes is a little hard to find just what you
want...but..it's probably all there...<g>

Do a GOOGLE search - enter PS/2 in the search box, and hit "I'm
Feeling Lucky" will take you right to Dennis Smith's PS/2 page on
members.tripod.com....

Do a GOOGLE search - enter PS/2 in the search box, and hit "Google
Search" will turn up a whole host of other information/sites.

Also, is that Warp 3 you have the Warp 3 that you need an external
Windows3.1 install for, or is it the Warp 3 that includes WIN-OS2
Windows3.1 support, or is it Warp 3 Connect.....???

You are going to get a bunch more hints/info from this group..they're
pretty helpful...

...gregy

-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client

#326 From: "scarygary_67" <glitzkow@...>
Date: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:02 pm
Subject: OS-2 Newbie.......
scarygary_67
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Greetings all!

I am so very new to the world of computing outside of BORG influence!
I will need lots of help in my challenge of de-assimilation!
It also does not help when you lack all the important documentation
for the version of OS-2 one is using! I currently have OS-2 Warp3
installed on one of my extra computers that is sitting around.
I also have collected IBM towers and desktops that seem to have been
intended to use OS-2. One in particular, looks like it was intended
to use the version of OS-2 that I have in its original box (Less the
books, of course!). This one is very nice, it has imbedded scsi wide
all over it including an external scsi port! I really want to use
this machine to its full extent since it is so nice and it was also
made for my OS-2 Warp 3. Alas, this IBM stuff needs some special
support to upgrade to more memory and other stuff. This tower just
sits there, waiting for me to do something with it! Anyone here have
any original 72 pin parity IBM ram sticks they don't need anymore? I
need four 8meg sticks that are guaranteed to work in this thing. What
I have is the PS/2 Ultimedia mini tower that is decked out with all
sorts of niceties, including a wicked nice multisync video card, and
imbedded audio that screams.

Hope to be cruising the information universe at warp 3 or 4 soon!

Gary.

#323 From: Kris Steenhaut <kris.steenhaut@...>
Date: Wed Jun 5, 2002 8:56 am
Subject: Re: [Warped Users] problem with JFS
krissteenhaut
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
rick0115 schreef:

> Could someone help me with this problem or direct me to the correct
> forum. I have HPFS installed on my C: drive. I have JFS on my D: E:
> and F: drive. I've heard JFS is much faster than HPFS.

It's faster than hpfs (lite), it's au pair with hpfs386, but in stability
hpfs386 still is light-years ago.
If you want to now more about hpfs386, just send me  a private message.

--
Groeten uit Gent,

    Kris

#322 From: "rick0115" <rmbraun@...>
Date: Wed Jun 5, 2002 1:04 am
Subject: problem with JFS
rick0115
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Could someone help me with this problem or direct me to the correct
forum. I have HPFS installed on my C: drive. I have JFS on my D: E:
and F: drive. I've heard JFS is much faster than HPFS. But it didn't
seem like it on my system so I ran Sysbench and Sysinfo to test it. As
you can see from the results, JFS is only half as fast as the HPFS
partition. any suggestions?



Chipset            - Unknown motherboard chipset
Processor          - AMD model 6662 found (not in cpu table) with MMX
This is a K7 1.4 GHz

External cache     - 64Kb internal instruction cache, 64Kb internal
data cache

Graphics card      - S3 Inc - 86C775 Trio64V2/DX, 86C785 Trio64V2/GX

Storage Controller - VIA Technologies Inc - VT82C586/A/B,VT82C686A
EIDE Controller

Storage Controller - Adaptec - AHA-2940U/UW Ultra/Ultra Wide SCSI Host
Adapter

Machine data
Coprocessor        = Yes
Processors         = 1
RAM                = 127.94 MB

Operating System data
OS/2 version       = 20.45
CSDLevel           = XR0C002_
FIXLevel           = XR0C002_
Revision number    = 14.088
Priority           = Dynamic
Maxwait            = 1
Timeslice          = (32,32)
Protectonly        = NO
Swap file size     = 32.00MB
   ...initially     = 6.00MB
  CPU integer
    Dhrystone             :     1914.400    VAX 11/780 MIPS equivalent
    Hanoi                 :     1220.000    moves/25 microseconds
    Heapsort              :      778.800    Million Instructions Per
Second
    Sieve                 :      985.400    Million Instructions Per
Second
    -----------------------------------------------
------------------------
    Total                 :     1367.517    CPU integer-marks
  CPU float
    Linpack               :      172.780    MFLOPS
    Flops                 :      524.490    MFLOPS
    Fast Fourier Transfrm :       88.570    VAX FFT's
    -----------------------------------------------
------------------------
    Total                 :      333.711    CPU floating point-marks


I realized Sysbench is a physical drive test because there is another
partition on the first drive. I have it labled drive F: and it did not
show in the Sysbench test. So below is another test from *Sysinfo*
which uses a composite file IO test. I tested C: and F: drive which
are both on the first physical drive.

Both of these drive partitions are on the same physical drive
Disk I/O disk 1-1: 17461 MB - WDIGTL WDE18300 ULTRA2 1.30

*This is Sysinfo*
Composite file IO using sequential and random file read and writes
using different file sizes. All numbers are bytes per second

Drive C: HPFS

1757700 Read Cached
  323000 Write Cached
1565100 Read Uncached
   11700 Write Uncached

Drive F: JFS

748600 Read Cached
516800 Write Cached
531300 Read Uncached
  11300 Write Uncached

Anyone have any ideas?

#321 From: waward41
Date: Mon Jun 3, 2002 1:13 am
Subject: 3175 errors
waward41
Offline Offline
 
I've reinstalled os/2 warp 4 back on,and I'm having quite a problem
with 3175 errors. Most of the exe files causes this error. I'm running
os/2 on a 8 gig drive partitioned into 4 equal partitions. Win 98 ia
on the first partition ,and os/2 in on the third partition with  fat
16. The drive that I'm using is the master on the secondary. In all of
the years that I;ve used os/2 ,I've never had this problem. I'm
wondering whether os/2 is trying to make a call to int13,and if so,how
do I deal with this.I'm plan to add two other large that are formatted
  as fat32. The first drive will have xp and 2000,and the second as
a slave on the primary will be for files.I use Power Boot@ to boot up
the different systems,including Mandrake Linux and BeOS. Any help out
there?

#320 From: jpasnak
Date: Thu May 2, 2002 2:35 am
Subject: Apache HTTP Server v2.0
jpasnak
Offline Offline
 
Though some of you might find this interesting:

  With Apache Server v2.0 comes a serious reorganization of code that makes it
much
easier to take full advantage of a platform's features, especially non-unix
platforms like
OS/2. The enhancements that have been implemented in Apache for OS/2 v2.0
include

- Multi-threaded, multi-process design for greatly reduced memory consumption,
better
performance & high stability. An access violation causes only the death of the
offending
thread, not the whole server. The fork() system call is not used to create
server
processes, removing the memory problems that v1.3 could encounter.

-Bypassing of the EMX unix compatibility library for both file and network I/O
by using
OS/2 API calls directly for better performance.


You can grab it at http://silk.apana.org.au/apache/apache_v2.shtml

#319 From: "adriansuri" <ASuri@...>
Date: Sat Apr 27, 2002 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: Ogg Vorbis
adriansuri
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In warpedusers@y..., jpasnak wrote:
> Stumbled upon this little gem of a site:
> <a href=http://silk.apana.org.au/vorbis/
target=new>http://silk.apana.org.au/vorbis/</a> . Don't know
how I missed it, with all the
> software he's put out. Hopefully a new version will come
> out now that 1.0 is just around the corner....

OS/2 is really shining on this one putting windows to shame,
I would also point out that as well as stand alone apps like
above location, there is also an OS/2 codec at
http://math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/MMIOMP3/
which allows you to play ogg file with the built in Digital
audio player, both files, and streaming, if you have installed
the netscape plug pack

Adrian

#318 From: richard_iesco_dms
Date: Fri Apr 26, 2002 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: Back up as a group
richard_iesc...
Offline Offline
 
--- In warpedusers@y..., jpasnak <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> It took quite a while, but Warped Users is finally back up as a
'Yahoo Group' now at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/warpedusers . For a while there, I was
getting paranoid,
> and believed they where never going to port it over to 'groups' :)
>
> J.P. Pasnak, CD

#317 From: jpasnak
Date: Fri Apr 26, 2002 6:24 am
Subject: Back up as a group
jpasnak
Offline Offline
 
It took quite a while, but Warped Users is finally back up as a 'Yahoo Group'
now at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/warpedusers . For a while there, I was getting
paranoid,
and believed they where never going to port it over to 'groups' :)

J.P. Pasnak, CD

#316 From: clemare
Date: Fri Nov 30, 2001 9:10 pm
Subject: Run Windows95 under OS/2
clemare
Send Email Send Email
 
Messages 316 - 369 of 371   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help