> well, i do hope you took it in the way it was intended... i was not joking and
it is/was a valid solution that many folk do use...

this is not very practicable for us. we cannot do a sponsoring of another server
for this costumer. also we can not do a daily manuell transfering, parsing and
2nd transfering of files. this should be automated but this kind of action seems
a bit far-fetched at this point.

> you might have to roll your sleeves up and modify your webalizer to use disk
disk files for its processing rather than it taking the
> (currently standard method used in many apps) current method of
> maintaining the lists in memory for fastest traversal and enumerating...

thats the point. how? i did not find fitting options...

> physical RAM space would also be a good and likely the best solution...

may be, but i can not sell this to this costumer... not for this reason...

hmm, need further suggestions. ;)

Thanks,
Hans