Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

webalizer · Support newsgroup for webalizer

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 1334
  • Category: Software
  • Founded: Jul 26, 2000
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 3127 - 3156 of 3841   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#3127 From: "jlyandco" <jlyandco@...>
Date: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:59 am
Subject: Re: Search strings, engines and agents STILL not showing up
jlyandco
Send Email Send Email
 
It sounds like part of the problem here may be that Webalizer is
running on a server that hosts at least a dozen different virtual
hosts on my server.

I don't think that I can list ALL of the different paths to the
differrent logs in my httpd.conf file, can I? I know that -- once I
"install" (okay, the IHP actually does it automatically when I say
"go" from my server control panel) a webalizer.conf file is then
available to me, which I can configure as I wish... but I think that I
may "break"' something if I tweak my httpd.conf file without knowing
EXACTLY what to do.

So, are you suggesting that I modify my httpd.conf to read:

CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log combined
CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost02.com-access_log combined
CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost03.com-access_log combined

This is a bit over my head, so ANY help would be appreciated.

Thanks for your patience as well as your guidance! You folks continue
to demonstrate the better qualities in humanity... thanks!

Kind regards,
Jeff

================================

--- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, Enric Naval <enventa2000@y...>
wrote:
> In webalizer.conf you have:
>
> LogFile      /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
>
> but in httpd.conf you have:
>
> CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> combined
>
>
> Shouldn't it be like this? :) Notice it says
> "combined".  Maybe you are using "common" instead.
> THis would explain the problems you are having.
>
> CustomLog /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log combined
>
>
> In your access_log you should have lines like this
> (all in one line):
>
> xxxxxxxxx.direcpc.com - - [01/Feb/2005:23:56:59 +0100]
> "GET /ipo/transpas/cscw.ppt HTTP/1.1" 200 535552
>
"http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=presentacion
+PPT+del+Planeta+Tierra&btnG=B%C3%BAsqueda&lr="
> "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
>
> This is for someone searching google for "presentacion
> PPT del Planeta Tierra", using MSIE 6.0. A "common"
> format log file will lack this information.
>
> --- jlyandco <jlyandco@y...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Not to be a broken record, but... can someone please
> > help me figure
> > out what's broke?
> >
> > I seem to get everything I want reporting, except
> > for the agents used,
> > or the search strings and engines used.
> >
> > I'm listing the log section of my httpd.conf file,
> > as well as one of
> > my webalizer.conf files so that you can see what
> > I've got... and can
> > pointout the obvious thing(s) that I'm missing.
> >
> > If I can answer any questions or be of ANY help to
> > you, just ask!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> > ==================================================
> > =====================================
> > FROM HTTPD.CONF
> > ================
> > # HostnameLookups: Log the names of clients or just
> > their IP addresses
> > # e.g., www.apache.org (on) or 204.62.129.132 (off).
> > # The default is off because it'd be overall better
> > for the net if
> > people
> > # had to knowingly turn this feature on, since
> > enabling it means that
> > # each client request will result in AT LEAST one
> > lookup request to
> > the
> > # nameserver.
> > #
> > HostnameLookups On
> > #
> > ErrorLog logs/error_log
> > #
> > # LogLevel: Control the number of messages logged to
> > the error_log.
> > # Possible values include: debug, info, notice,
> > warn, error, crit,
> > # alert, emerg.
> > #
> > LogLevel warn
> > #
> > # The following directives define some format
> > nicknames for use with
> > # a CustomLog directive (see below).
> > #
> > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
> > LogFormat "%{Referer}i -> %U" referer
> > LogFormat "%{User-agent}i" agent
> > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\"
> > \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined
> > #
> > # The location and format of the access logfile
> > (Common Logfile
> > Format).
> > # If you do not define any access logfiles within a
> > <VirtualHost>
> > # container, they will be logged here.
> > Contrariwise, if you *do*
> > # define per-<VirtualHost> access logfiles,
> > transactions will be
> > # logged therein and *not* in this file.
> > #
> > #CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > common
> > #
> > # If you would like to have agent and referer
> > logfiles, uncomment the
> > # following directives.
> > #
> > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/referer_log
> > referer
> > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/agent_log agent
> > #
> > # If you prefer a single logfile with access, agent,
> > and referer
> > information
> > # (Combined Logfile Format) you can use the
> > following directive.
> > #
> > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > combined
> > ====================================================
> > FROM WEBALIZER.CONF
> > ===================
> > AllSites yes
> > AllURLs yes
> > AllReferrers yes
> > AllSearchStr yes
> > CountryGraph yes
> > GMTTime no
> > GraphLegend yes
> > GraphLines 2
> > #GroupAgent
> > GroupHighlight yes
> > #GroupReferrer
> > GroupShading yes
> > #GroupSite
> > #GroupURL
> > #HideAgent
> > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/
> > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/cpanel*
> > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/html/
> > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/webalizer*
> > HideSite *jlyarberry.com
> > HideSite localhost
> > HideURL */cpanel
> > HideURL *.gif
> > HideURL *.GIF
> > HideURL *.png
> > HideURL *.PNG
> > HideURL *.ra
> > HideUser cpanel
> > HideUser login
> > HourlyGraph yes
> > HourlyStats yes
> > #IgnoreAgent
> > #IgnoreReferrer
> > #IgnoreSite
> > #IgnoreURL
> > #IncludeAgent
> > #IncludeReferrer
> > #IncludeSite
> > #IncludeURL
> > IndexAlias index
> > LogFile /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> > MangleAgents Level 1
> > SearchEngine yahoo.com p=
> > SearchEngine altavista.com q=
> > SearchEngine google.com q=
> > SearchEngine eureka.com q=
> > SearchEngine lycos.com query=
> > SearchEngine hotbot.com MT=
> > SearchEngine msn.com MT=
> > SearchEngine infoseek.com qt=
> > SearchEngine webcrawler searchText=
> > SearchEngine excite search=
> > SearchEngine netscape.com search=
> > SearchEngine mamma.com query=
> > SearchEngine alltheweb.com query=
> > SearchEngine northernlight.com qr=
> > PageType *.htm
> > PageType *.html
> > PageType *.cgi
> > ReportTitle Usage Statistics for
> > TopAgents 15
> > TopCountries 50
> > TopEntry 10
> > TopExit 10
> > TopKSites 10
> > TopKURLs 50
> > TopReferrers 50
> > TopSearch 20
> > TopSites 30
> > TopURLs 100
> > VisitTimeout 003000

#3128 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Search strings, engines and agents STILL not showing up
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
It's more difficult than that.

In your httpd.conf, you problably have several
VitualHost containers. You have to place a different
CustomLog directive in each container. Containers
without a CustomLog directive will have by default its
visits written in the general log.

<VirtualHost virtualhost01>
   CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
combined
   Other_directives....
</VirtualHost>

<VirtualHost virtualhost02>
   CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
combined
   Other_directives....
</VirtualHost>

# This virtual host will have its visits
#   written in access_log
<VirtualHost virtualhost03>
   Other_directives....
</VirtualHost>



Make sure that you have a line like this somewhere in
ypur httpd.conf, before any CustomLog line. This is
the most standard log format, you should have already
it somewhere in the file:

LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\"
\"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined


You probably were using a format like this. This is
the common format, with no referrer nor user agent (it
has no search strings, because they are found in the
referrers):

LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common

(I have looked at your former emails, and you do have
these lines, ....)

--- jlyandco <jlyandco@...> wrote:

>
> It sounds like part of the problem here may be that
> Webalizer is
> running on a server that hosts at least a dozen
> different virtual
> hosts on my server.
>
> I don't think that I can list ALL of the different
> paths to the
> differrent logs in my httpd.conf file, can I? I know
> that -- once I
> "install" (okay, the IHP actually does it
> automatically when I say
> "go" from my server control panel) a webalizer.conf
> file is then
> available to me, which I can configure as I wish...
> but I think that I
> may "break"' something if I tweak my httpd.conf file
> without knowing
> EXACTLY what to do.
>
> So, are you suggesting that I modify my httpd.conf
> to read:
>
> CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
> combined
> CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost02.com-access_log
> combined
> CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost03.com-access_log
> combined
>
> This is a bit over my head, so ANY help would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks for your patience as well as your guidance!
> You folks continue
> to demonstrate the better qualities in humanity...
> thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Jeff
>
> ================================
>
> --- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, Enric Naval
> <enventa2000@y...>
> wrote:
> > In webalizer.conf you have:
> >
> > LogFile      /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> >
> > but in httpd.conf you have:
> >
> > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > combined
> >
> >
> > Shouldn't it be like this? :) Notice it says
> > "combined".  Maybe you are using "common" instead.
> > THis would explain the problems you are having.
> >
> > CustomLog /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> combined
> >
> >
> > In your access_log you should have lines like this
> > (all in one line):
> >
> > xxxxxxxxx.direcpc.com - - [01/Feb/2005:23:56:59
> +0100]
> > "GET /ipo/transpas/cscw.ppt HTTP/1.1" 200 535552
> >
> "http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=presentacion
> +PPT+del+Planeta+Tierra&btnG=B%C3%BAsqueda&lr="
> > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT
> 5.1)"
> >
> > This is for someone searching google for
> "presentacion
> > PPT del Planeta Tierra", using MSIE 6.0. A
> "common"
> > format log file will lack this information.
> >
> > --- jlyandco <jlyandco@y...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Not to be a broken record, but... can someone
> please
> > > help me figure
> > > out what's broke?
> > >
> > > I seem to get everything I want reporting,
> except
> > > for the agents used,
> > > or the search strings and engines used.
> > >
> > > I'm listing the log section of my httpd.conf
> file,
> > > as well as one of
> > > my webalizer.conf files so that you can see what
> > > I've got... and can
> > > pointout the obvious thing(s) that I'm missing.
> > >
> > > If I can answer any questions or be of ANY help
> to
> > > you, just ask!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> ==================================================
> > > =====================================
> > > FROM HTTPD.CONF
> > > ================
> > > # HostnameLookups: Log the names of clients or
> just
> > > their IP addresses
> > > # e.g., www.apache.org (on) or 204.62.129.132
> (off).
> > > # The default is off because it'd be overall
> better
> > > for the net if
> > > people
> > > # had to knowingly turn this feature on, since
> > > enabling it means that
> > > # each client request will result in AT LEAST
> one
> > > lookup request to
> > > the
> > > # nameserver.
> > > #
> > > HostnameLookups On
> > > #
> > > ErrorLog logs/error_log
> > > #
> > > # LogLevel: Control the number of messages
> logged to
> > > the error_log.
> > > # Possible values include: debug, info, notice,
> > > warn, error, crit,
> > > # alert, emerg.
> > > #
> > > LogLevel warn
> > > #
> > > # The following directives define some format
> > > nicknames for use with
> > > # a CustomLog directive (see below).
> > > #
> > > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
> > > LogFormat "%{Referer}i -> %U" referer
> > > LogFormat "%{User-agent}i" agent
> > > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b
> \"%{Referer}i\"
> > > \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined
> > > #
> > > # The location and format of the access logfile
> > > (Common Logfile
> > > Format).
> > > # If you do not define any access logfiles
> within a
> > > <VirtualHost>
> > > # container, they will be logged here.
> > > Contrariwise, if you *do*
> > > # define per-<VirtualHost> access logfiles,
> > > transactions will be
> > > # logged therein and *not* in this file.
> > > #
> > > #CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > > common
> > > #
> > > # If you would like to have agent and referer
> > > logfiles, uncomment the
> > > # following directives.
> > > #
> > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/referer_log
> > > referer
> > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/agent_log
> agent
> > > #
> > > # If you prefer a single logfile with access,
> agent,
> > > and referer
> > > information
> > > # (Combined Logfile Format) you can use the
> > > following directive.
> > > #
> > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > > combined
> > >
> ====================================================
> > > FROM WEBALIZER.CONF
> > > ===================
> > > AllSites yes
> > > AllURLs yes
> > > AllReferrers yes
> > > AllSearchStr yes
> > > CountryGraph yes
> > > GMTTime no
> > > GraphLegend yes
> > > GraphLines 2
> > > #GroupAgent
> > > GroupHighlight yes
> > > #GroupReferrer
> > > GroupShading yes
> > > #GroupSite
> > > #GroupURL
> > > #HideAgent
> > > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/
> > > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/cpanel*
> > > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/html/
> > > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/webalizer*
> > > HideSite *jlyarberry.com
> > > HideSite localhost
> > > HideURL */cpanel
> > > HideURL *.gif
> > > HideURL *.GIF
> > > HideURL *.png
> > > HideURL *.PNG
> > > HideURL *.ra
> > > HideUser cpanel
> > > HideUser login
> > > HourlyGraph yes
> > > HourlyStats yes
> > > #IgnoreAgent
> > > #IgnoreReferrer
> > > #IgnoreSite
> > > #IgnoreURL
> > > #IncludeAgent
> > > #IncludeReferrer
> > > #IncludeSite
> > > #IncludeURL
> > > IndexAlias index
> > > LogFile /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> > > MangleAgents Level 1
> > > SearchEngine yahoo.com p=
> > > SearchEngine altavista.com q=
> > > SearchEngine google.com q=
> > > SearchEngine eureka.com q=
> > > SearchEngine lycos.com query=
> > > SearchEngine hotbot.com MT=
> > > SearchEngine msn.com MT=
> > > SearchEngine infoseek.com qt=
> > > SearchEngine webcrawler searchText=
> > > SearchEngine excite search=
> > > SearchEngine netscape.com search=
> > > SearchEngine mamma.com query=
> > > SearchEngine alltheweb.com query=
> > > SearchEngine northernlight.com qr=
> > > PageType *.htm
> > > PageType *.html
> > > PageType *.cgi
> > > ReportTitle Usage Statistics for
> > > TopAgents 15
> > > TopCountries 50
> > > TopEntry 10
> > > TopExit 10
> > > TopKSites 10
> > > TopKURLs 50
> > > TopReferrers 50
> > > TopSearch 20
> > > TopSites 30
> > > TopURLs 100
> > > VisitTimeout 003000
>
>
>
>


=====
Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3129 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:56 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Search strings, engines and agents STILL not showing up
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Errrr, in this example both virtual hosts 01 and 02
get written to the 01 logfile, because I forgot to
change the name in the CustomLog line. In the second
container, it should be "02", not "01". This is an
example of a typical mistake that can break your logs
:(

--- Enric Naval <enventa2000@...> wrote:

>
> It's more difficult than that.
>
> In your httpd.conf, you problably have several
> VitualHost containers. You have to place a different
> CustomLog directive in each container. Containers
> without a CustomLog directive will have by default
> its
> visits written in the general log.
>
> <VirtualHost virtualhost01>
>   CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
> combined
>   Other_directives....
> </VirtualHost>
>
> <VirtualHost virtualhost02>
>   CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
> combined
>   Other_directives....
> </VirtualHost>
>
> # This virtual host will have its visits
> #   written in access_log
> <VirtualHost virtualhost03>
>   Other_directives....
> </VirtualHost>
>
>
>
> Make sure that you have a line like this somewhere
> in
> ypur httpd.conf, before any CustomLog line. This is
> the most standard log format, you should have
> already
> it somewhere in the file:
>
> LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\"
> \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined
>
>
> You probably were using a format like this. This is
> the common format, with no referrer nor user agent
> (it
> has no search strings, because they are found in the
> referrers):
>
> LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
>
> (I have looked at your former emails, and you do
> have
> these lines, ....)
>
> --- jlyandco <jlyandco@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > It sounds like part of the problem here may be
> that
> > Webalizer is
> > running on a server that hosts at least a dozen
> > different virtual
> > hosts on my server.
> >
> > I don't think that I can list ALL of the different
> > paths to the
> > differrent logs in my httpd.conf file, can I? I
> know
> > that -- once I
> > "install" (okay, the IHP actually does it
> > automatically when I say
> > "go" from my server control panel) a
> webalizer.conf
> > file is then
> > available to me, which I can configure as I
> wish...
> > but I think that I
> > may "break"' something if I tweak my httpd.conf
> file
> > without knowing
> > EXACTLY what to do.
> >
> > So, are you suggesting that I modify my httpd.conf
> > to read:
> >
> > CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost01.com-access_log
> > combined
> > CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost02.com-access_log
> > combined
> > CustomLog /www/logs/virtualhost03.com-access_log
> > combined
> >
> > This is a bit over my head, so ANY help would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks for your patience as well as your guidance!
> > You folks continue
> > to demonstrate the better qualities in humanity...
> > thanks!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Jeff
> >
> > ================================
> >
> > --- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, Enric Naval
> > <enventa2000@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > In webalizer.conf you have:
> > >
> > > LogFile      /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> > >
> > > but in httpd.conf you have:
> > >
> > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > > combined
> > >
> > >
> > > Shouldn't it be like this? :) Notice it says
> > > "combined".  Maybe you are using "common"
> instead.
> > > THis would explain the problems you are having.
> > >
> > > CustomLog /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> > combined
> > >
> > >
> > > In your access_log you should have lines like
> this
> > > (all in one line):
> > >
> > > xxxxxxxxx.direcpc.com - - [01/Feb/2005:23:56:59
> > +0100]
> > > "GET /ipo/transpas/cscw.ppt HTTP/1.1" 200 535552
> > >
> > "http://www.google.com/search?hl=es&q=presentacion
> > +PPT+del+Planeta+Tierra&btnG=B%C3%BAsqueda&lr="
> > > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT
> > 5.1)"
> > >
> > > This is for someone searching google for
> > "presentacion
> > > PPT del Planeta Tierra", using MSIE 6.0. A
> > "common"
> > > format log file will lack this information.
> > >
> > > --- jlyandco <jlyandco@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Not to be a broken record, but... can someone
> > please
> > > > help me figure
> > > > out what's broke?
> > > >
> > > > I seem to get everything I want reporting,
> > except
> > > > for the agents used,
> > > > or the search strings and engines used.
> > > >
> > > > I'm listing the log section of my httpd.conf
> > file,
> > > > as well as one of
> > > > my webalizer.conf files so that you can see
> what
> > > > I've got... and can
> > > > pointout the obvious thing(s) that I'm
> missing.
> > > >
> > > > If I can answer any questions or be of ANY
> help
> > to
> > > > you, just ask!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > ==================================================
> > > > =====================================
> > > > FROM HTTPD.CONF
> > > > ================
> > > > # HostnameLookups: Log the names of clients or
> > just
> > > > their IP addresses
> > > > # e.g., www.apache.org (on) or 204.62.129.132
> > (off).
> > > > # The default is off because it'd be overall
> > better
> > > > for the net if
> > > > people
> > > > # had to knowingly turn this feature on, since
> > > > enabling it means that
> > > > # each client request will result in AT LEAST
> > one
> > > > lookup request to
> > > > the
> > > > # nameserver.
> > > > #
> > > > HostnameLookups On
> > > > #
> > > > ErrorLog logs/error_log
> > > > #
> > > > # LogLevel: Control the number of messages
> > logged to
> > > > the error_log.
> > > > # Possible values include: debug, info,
> notice,
> > > > warn, error, crit,
> > > > # alert, emerg.
> > > > #
> > > > LogLevel warn
> > > > #
> > > > # The following directives define some format
> > > > nicknames for use with
> > > > # a CustomLog directive (see below).
> > > > #
> > > > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
> > > > LogFormat "%{Referer}i -> %U" referer
> > > > LogFormat "%{User-agent}i" agent
> > > > LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b
> > \"%{Referer}i\"
> > > > \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combined
> > > > #
> > > > # The location and format of the access
> logfile
> > > > (Common Logfile
> > > > Format).
> > > > # If you do not define any access logfiles
> > within a
> > > > <VirtualHost>
> > > > # container, they will be logged here.
> > > > Contrariwise, if you *do*
> > > > # define per-<VirtualHost> access logfiles,
> > > > transactions will be
> > > > # logged therein and *not* in this file.
> > > > #
> > > > #CustomLog
> /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > > > common
> > > > #
> > > > # If you would like to have agent and referer
> > > > logfiles, uncomment the
> > > > # following directives.
> > > > #
> > > > CustomLog
> /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/referer_log
> > > > referer
> > > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/agent_log
> > agent
> > > > #
> > > > # If you prefer a single logfile with access,
> > agent,
> > > > and referer
> > > > information
> > > > # (Combined Logfile Format) you can use the
> > > > following directive.
> > > > #
> > > > CustomLog /usr/local/etc/httpd/logs/access_log
> > > > combined
> > > >
> >
> ====================================================
> > > > FROM WEBALIZER.CONF
> > > > ===================
> > > > AllSites yes
> > > > AllURLs yes
> > > > AllReferrers yes
> > > > AllSearchStr yes
> > > > CountryGraph yes
> > > > GMTTime no
> > > > GraphLegend yes
> > > > GraphLines 2
> > > > #GroupAgent
> > > > GroupHighlight yes
> > > > #GroupReferrer
> > > > GroupShading yes
> > > > #GroupSite
> > > > #GroupURL
> > > > #HideAgent
> > > > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/
> > > > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/cpanel*
> > > > HideReferrer *jlyarberry.com/html/
> > > > HideReferrer jlyarberry.com/webalizer*
> > > > HideSite *jlyarberry.com
> > > > HideSite localhost
> > > > HideURL */cpanel
> > > > HideURL *.gif
> > > > HideURL *.GIF
> > > > HideURL *.png
> > > > HideURL *.PNG
> > > > HideURL *.ra
> > > > HideUser cpanel
> > > > HideUser login
> > > > HourlyGraph yes
> > > > HourlyStats yes
> > > > #IgnoreAgent
> > > > #IgnoreReferrer
> > > > #IgnoreSite
> > > > #IgnoreURL
> > > > #IncludeAgent
> > > > #IncludeReferrer
> > > > #IncludeSite
> > > > #IncludeURL
> > > > IndexAlias index
> > > > LogFile /www/logs/jlyarberry.com-access_log
> > > > MangleAgents Level 1
> > > > SearchEngine yahoo.com p=
> > > > SearchEngine altavista.com q=
> > > > SearchEngine google.com q=
> > > > SearchEngine eureka.com q=
> > > > SearchEngine lycos.com query=
> > > > SearchEngine hotbot.com MT=
> > > > SearchEngine msn.com MT=
> > > > SearchEngine infoseek.com qt=
> > > > SearchEngine webcrawler searchText=
> > > > SearchEngine excite search=
> > > > SearchEngine netscape.com search=
> > > > SearchEngine mamma.com query=
> > > > SearchEngine alltheweb.com query=
> > > > SearchEngine northernlight.com qr=
> > > > PageType *.htm
> > > > PageType *.html
> > > > PageType *.cgi
> > > > ReportTitle Usage Statistics for
> > > > TopAgents 15
> > > > TopCountries 50
> > > > TopEntry 10
> > > > TopExit 10
> > > > TopKSites 10
> > > > TopKURLs 50
> > > > TopReferrers 50
> > > > TopSearch 20
> > > > TopSites 30
> > > > TopURLs 100
> > > > VisitTimeout 003000
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> =====
> Enric Naval
> Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl
> (Lleida)
> GRIHO webalizer.conf
> http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> Webalizer homepage: http://www.webalizer.org
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     webalizer-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>


=====
Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3130 From: Ryan Barrett <yahooid@...>
Date: Sat Mar 5, 2005 11:33 pm
Subject: nofollow patch
ryandcb
Send Email Send Email
 
hi all. i've written a trivial (four-line) webalizer patch that adds
support for the nofollow tag. you can find the patch here:

http://snarfed.org/space/webalizer+nofollow+patch

you can find more info on nofollow here:

http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html

enjoy!

-Ryan

--
http://ryan.barrett.name/

#3131 From: Ryan Barrett <yahooid@...>
Date: Sun Mar 6, 2005 8:26 pm
Subject: isurlchar() fix breaks search strings?
ryandcb
Send Email Send Email
 
hi all. i recently tried the isurlchar() fix (adding ?, &, and =) to show
query parameters in referrers and other URLs. it works great, but as
enventa mentioned a while ago, it breaks the search strings report.

has anyone handled this yet? i'm guessing it wouldn't be hard to fix, but
i'd rather not duplicate work if someone's already done it.

bradford, last august you mentioned you'd written a patch that adds a
configuration switch to support this. does it also keep the search strings
report working? if so, would you mind publishing it? thanks in advance...

-Ryan

--
http://ryan.barrett.name/

#3132 From: "soren625" <p_d_burton@...>
Date: Mon Mar 7, 2005 6:27 pm
Subject: Trying to Create apache alias for webalizer output directory
soren625
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

I am trying to create an alias in httpd.conf like so:

#
# Webalizer usage statistics page
#
Alias /usage/ "/var/www/usage/"

<Directory "/var/www/usage">
         AllowOverride All
         Options None
         Order allow,deny
         Allow from ALL
</Directory>

that will allow me to view usage statistics from the Web.

However, when I restart apache with this alias added, I get this:

Starting httpd: [Mon Mar 07 13:26:38 2005] [warn] The Alias directive
in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf at line 530 will probably never match
because it overlaps an earlier Alias.

I know this is not specifically a Webalizer issue, but I thought
perhaps some of you Webalizer pros may have some experience in this
matter.

Thanks.

#3133 From: Stephen Block <steve@...>
Date: Tue Mar 8, 2005 9:27 am
Subject: Broken DNS lookup?
steveblock
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

I recently recompiled webalizer after changing the useragent field size
so that it catches firefox, and since I recompiled it the dns doesn't
seem to work.  Any thoughts.  I'm not a programmer or anything, just
trying to learn my way, so any help would be appreciated.

#3134 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Tue Mar 8, 2005 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: Trying to Create apache alias for webalizer output directory
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
--- soren625 <p_d_burton@...> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create an alias in httpd.conf like
> so:
>
> #
> # Webalizer usage statistics page
> #
> Alias /usage/ "/var/www/usage/"
>
> <Directory "/var/www/usage">
>         AllowOverride All
>         Options None
>         Order allow,deny
>         Allow from ALL
> </Directory>
>
> that will allow me to view usage statistics from the
> Web.
>
> However, when I restart apache with this alias
> added, I get this:
>
> Starting httpd: [Mon Mar 07 13:26:38 2005] [warn]
> The Alias directive
> in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf at line 530 will
> probably never match
> because it overlaps an earlier Alias.


This is because in a line before line 530 you have an
Alias line that goes similar to this:

Alias /usage "/some/path/to/somewhere"

or lke this:

Alias /us "/some/path/to/there"


Any request will be compared by apache alias by alias,
in the same order they the alias are listed in
httpd.conf.

These alias I have put here happen to match the same
requests that the line you are trying to add and are
also listed before in httpd.conf.

So: any "/usatge/blablabla" request from a visitor to
your website will match both a "/us" alias and a
"/usatge/" alias, but "/us" is listed before in
httpd.conf, so it is the first one to be compared, and
so it is the first one to be matched.

Once that one alias line is matched, no more alias
lines are compared to the request (because you cannot
alias to two different places).

Apache notices this problem and then issues a warning
so you can mend your alias list.


>
> I know this is not specifically a Webalizer issue,
> but I thought
> perhaps some of you Webalizer pros may have some
> experience in this
> matter.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>


Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3135 From: Stephen Block <steve@...>
Date: Tue Mar 8, 2005 1:18 pm
Subject: Re: Broken DNS lookup?
steveblock
Send Email Send Email
 
Ah, worked it out, sorry to trouble you, hadn't set the dns.

#3136 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Wed Mar 9, 2005 5:43 pm
Subject: Re: nofollow patch (bash script)
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello:

I think that the next version of webalizer should
include nofollow tags in the Referrer list! My stats
are slowly getting filled by spammers :(

I have made a bash script that will create a clean
logfile from a logfile full of referal spam.

http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/clean_logs.sh


Use like this :

[root@griho httpd]# cd /var/log/httpd
[root@griho httpd]# /root/netejar_logs.sh access_log
Grepping the file for 297 spammer keywords, please
wait...
access_log ORIGINAL SIZE:  124512
access_log GREPPED SIZE:  121798
access_log DIFERENT LINES:  4380 end of diff
a clean file was created from access_log and is called
clean_logs.temp
backup is in access_log.bk
[root@griho httpd]# cp clean_logs.temp access_log
cp: overwrite `access_log'? y
[root@griho httpd]# service httpd reload
Reloading httpd:
     [  OK  ]
[root@griho httpd]#


Notice I'm using a live logfile, which is not
recommended! You'll need to reload apache after this.

Notice that I copy manually the clean file over the
logfile. I always check the clean file size, to spot
any problems BEFORE overwriting.


--- Ryan Barrett <yahooid@...> wrote:

> hi all. i've written a trivial (four-line) webalizer
> patch that adds
> support for the nofollow tag. you can find the patch
> here:
>
> http://snarfed.org/space/webalizer+nofollow+patch
>
> you can find more info on nofollow here:
>
>
http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html
>
> enjoy!
>
> -Ryan
>
> --
> http://ryan.barrett.name/
>


Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt




__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

#3137 From: Duong Kien <kientin7@...>
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:21 am
Subject: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
kientin7
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi
I'm a student.
I want to know how to Webalizer generates Reports.
Where could I get the answear ?

rgds,
kiendq



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

#3138 From: waldo kitty <wkitty42@...>
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:36 am
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
wkitty42
Send Email Send Email
 
Duong Kien wrote:
> Hi
> I'm a student.

ok...

> I want to know how to Webalizer generates Reports.

quite easily... it counts the criteria needed...

> Where could I get the answear ?

the source code is the final solution...

--
         _\/
        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
__ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3139 From: p_d_burton@...
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
soren625
Send Email Send Email
 
<quote>
...
ok...
...
quite easily... it counts the criteria needed...
...
the source code is the final solution...
</quote>

Pardon me if this is off-topic, but haughty, obtuse answers are not very
conducive to information-sharing.

#3140 From: waldo kitty <wkitty42@...>
Date: Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:22 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
wkitty42
Send Email Send Email
 
p_d_burton@... wrote:
> <quote>
> ...
> ok...
> ...
> quite easily... it counts the criteria needed...
> ...
> the source code is the final solution...
> </quote>
>
> Pardon me if this is off-topic, but haughty, obtuse answers are not very
conducive to information-sharing.

i don't know where you buy your answers from but mine don't come with hauty and
obtuse... i have to add that... the
above is definitely not hauty or obtuse and i fail to see how you came up with
that attitude when no attitude was
expressed at all...

when it comes down to plain bare facts, the above answer(s) are just like a
bikini... they are short and to the point...
they answer the original question(s), too! ;)

--
         _\/
        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
__ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3141 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:01 am
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
--- waldo kitty <wkitty42@...> wrote:

> p_d_burton@... wrote:
> > <quote>
> > ...
> > ok...
> > ...
> > quite easily... it counts the criteria needed...
> > ...
> > the source code is the final solution...
> > </quote>
> >
> > Pardon me if this is off-topic, but haughty,
> obtuse answers are not very conducive to
> information-sharing.
>
> i don't know where you buy your answers from but
> mine don't come with hauty and obtuse... i have to
> add that... the
> above is definitely not hauty or obtuse and i fail
> to see how you came up with that attitude when no
> attitude was
> expressed at all...
>
> when it comes down to plain bare facts, the above
> answer(s) are just like a bikini... they are short
> and to the point...
> they answer the original question(s), too! ;)
>

Hello:

Please relax and read this.


FUNCTION answer_in_friendly_manner question eranswerer
BEGIN
   //(this is written in pseudo-code)
   I believe that $answerer means that explaining
accurately how webalizer generates reports is very
long and that $answerer gets nothing from using
several hours explaining matters that $questioner
would understand way better if $questioner actually
opened the source code with a text editor and examined
it using his knowledge in C.;
   Once $questioner has gotten a hold of C language and
actually made the effort to examine the source code,
$questioner will be able to formulate more concrete
questions that will have a higher probability of being
answered by $answerer.;
   reference_URL(
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q=how+to+make+intelligent+questions&btnG=B%C3%\
BAsqueda&meta=
);
END




answer_in_friendly_manner( this.student,
this.waldo_kitty )



Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

#3142 From: waldo kitty <wkitty42@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:05 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
wkitty42
Send Email Send Email
 
Enric Naval wrote:
>
[trim]
> Hello:
>
> Please relax and read this.
>

excellent! i love it!! extremely accurate ;) ;)

>
> FUNCTION answer_in_friendly_manner question eranswerer
> BEGIN
>   //(this is written in pseudo-code)
>   I believe that $answerer means that explaining
> accurately how webalizer generates reports is very
> long and that $answerer gets nothing from using
> several hours explaining matters that $questioner
> would understand way better if $questioner actually
> opened the source code with a text editor and examined
> it using his knowledge in C.;
>   Once $questioner has gotten a hold of C language and
> actually made the effort to examine the source code,
> $questioner will be able to formulate more concrete
> questions that will have a higher probability of being
> answered by $answerer.;
>   reference_URL(
>
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q=how+to+make+intelligent+questions&btnG=B%C3%\
BAsqueda&meta=

i'll have to bookmark that url for future use O:)

> );
> END
>
>
>
>
> answer_in_friendly_manner( this.student,
> this.waldo_kitty )



--
         _\/
        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
__ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3143 From: "Jason Novak" <jmnovak@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:11 pm
Subject: Search string by referrers.
jmnovak
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear all,

I'm trying to understand whether or not webalizer has the capability
to report on search string by referrers.  I know you can group
referrers which is nice but I'm looking for something that can show
the search string that's being typed from whatever search site.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

Jason

#3144 From: p_d_burton@...
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:55 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
soren625
Send Email Send Email
 
<quote>
excellent! i love it!! extremely accurate ;) ;)
</quote>

Agreed. While a concise, well-executed question is the easiest to answer, doing
a little extra to connect with the "asker" saves time and confusion. I think
this is a big hurdle for OSS especially: most support comes from developers.

I am not a programmer or developer, I am a technical writer for a software
company, and every day I have to explain to programmers why software has to be
usable. I think the problem is that programmers are too close to the software.
The focus is put more on the "why" than the "how." Ultimately (in extreme
cases), programmers don't even know how to _use_ the software, just why someone
would need to execute this method, or call that function, etc.

In the example at hand, when a user asks how Webalizer works in a general way,
you _could_ tersely state the utterly obvious (while assuming that the "asker"
is ignorant), or you could, for example, point them toward some other resource
(we assume _you_ are a resource given the fact that you participate in this
list). You could even (horrors!) _ask_ for clarification of the question.

I don't want to beat a dead horse. I know this is not the forum for this
particular discussion. I just want to make clear my opinion that projects like
this would be much easier to work with if _everyone_ went out of his/her way to
understand and be understood, regardless of whether other people are doing it.

#3145 From: waldo kitty <wkitty42@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:37 pm
Subject: Re: Search string by referrers.
wkitty42
Send Email Send Email
 
Jason Novak wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to understand whether or not webalizer has the capability
> to report on search string by referrers.  I know you can group
> referrers which is nice but I'm looking for something that can show
> the search string that's being typed from whatever search site.
>
> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

webalizer does do the search strings...

FWIW: this may be sacriledge in this group, but there is also awstats which does
this function and more...

--
         _\/
        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
__ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3146 From: waldo kitty <wkitty42@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:49 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
wkitty42
Send Email Send Email
 
p_d_burton@... wrote:
> <quote>
> excellent! i love it!! extremely accurate ;) ;)
> </quote>
>
> Agreed. While a concise, well-executed question is the easiest to answer,
doing a little extra to connect with the "asker" saves time and confusion. I
think this is a big hurdle for OSS especially: most support comes from
developers.

in some cases, yes... in many others, it comes from testers and users who have
dug in and worked out the how's and why's ;)

> I am not a programmer or developer, I am a technical writer for a software
company, and every day I have to explain to programmers why software has to be
usable. I think the problem is that programmers are too close to the software.
The focus is put more on the "why" than the "how." Ultimately (in extreme
cases), programmers don't even know how to _use_ the software, just why someone
would need to execute this method, or call that function, etc.

this is very true... i've been a coder for many years... close to 30 if i really
count... i've also done technical
writting insofar as writting some user structural manuals but that was many
years ago, too... your thoughts on the
coders being too close to the code is accurate, too... i do recognize that what
is obvious to a coder may not be obvious
to a user...

as an example, i remember way back when the tandy 1000 first hit the streets...
there were many many folk who diligently
followed the instructions in the manual and wiped out the only boot floppy that
came with the machine... this happened
because the manual never explicitly stated to remove the boot floppy and insert
a blank one... the "funniest" thing
about this situation was that it was the section starting off about making
backup copies of the boot floppy in case
something happened to it and the original was unusable! ;) ;)  of course, that
was only funny to those like myself that
saw the problem and couldn't believe that that one single step being left out
could really cause such a situation...

anyway, my main goal in answering that post was to give that person at least one
answer because i figured that not many
others would answer him... this group is pretty low traffic, ya know... i also
figured that that person would reply with
a few more questions asking for further clarification... i'll also note that no
one else has written an answer in the
group to that person's original question ;)

--
         _\/
        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
__ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
_|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3147 From: "rknaak05" <rknaak05@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: Search string by referrers.
rknaak05
Send Email Send Email
 
I agree I think this is a much needed feature in webalizer.  I am
actually looking for a programmer to add this feature and a few others
into webalizer.  If you area contract programmer and want to discuss
specifics, please contact me.

Rob

--- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, waldo kitty <wkitty42@a...> wrote:
> Jason Novak wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand whether or not webalizer has the capability
> > to report on search string by referrers.  I know you can group
> > referrers which is nice but I'm looking for something that can show
> > the search string that's being typed from whatever search site.
> >
> > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
> webalizer does do the search strings...
>
> FWIW: this may be sacriledge in this group, but there is also
awstats which does this function and more...
>
> --
>         _\/
>        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
> __ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
> _|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
> ____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
> _|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net

#3148 From: p_d_burton@...
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:15 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Search string by referrers.
soren625
Send Email Send Email
 
Do you specifically need the search strings to be grouped by referrer?

I agree I think this is a much needed feature in webalizer.  I am
actually looking for a programmer to add this feature and a few others
into webalizer.  If you area contract programmer and want to discuss
specifics, please contact me.

Rob

--- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, waldo kitty <wkitty42@a...> wrote:
> Jason Novak wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand whether or not webalizer has the capability
> > to report on search string by referrers.  I know you can group
> > referrers which is nice but I'm looking for something that can show
> > the search string that's being typed from whatever search site.
> >
> > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
> webalizer does do the search strings...
>
> FWIW: this may be sacriledge in this group, but there is also
awstats which does this function and more...
>
> --
>         _\/
>        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA
> __ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
> _|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
> ____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
> _|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net





Webalizer homepage: http://www.webalizer.org




#3149 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:01 pm
Subject: Re: Help me understand Webalizer , pls !
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
waldo said...

  i'll also note that no one else has
> written an answer in the
> group to that person's original question ;)
>

Oooops, you're right.


Okay, let's see, allow me to make a small answer for
that person.



The actual webalizer reports are generated in the
files "output.c" and "output.h".

The logfiles that are feeded to webalizer are parsed
in "parser.h" and "parser.c".

The nice graphs are generated in "graphs.h" and
"graphs.c". Pretty obvious until here. (From now on
I'll use something.h/c instead something.h,
something.c)

Webalizer uses internally both lists and hashtables,
those are defined in "hastab.h/c" and "linklist.h/c".

"dns_resolv./hc" make the DNS resolution, to translate
IPs to hostnames.

"preserve.h/c" I believe it is for managing the
incremental mode, the histoy file, and such.

Webalizer parses the logfiles with parser.h/c, saving
the parsed information in structures which are defined
in hastab.h/c and linklist.h/c. If dns resolving is
on, it will use the functions defined in dns_resolv to
resolve the IPs. Then it uses preserve.h/c to decide
what output it should generate, and finally executes
the functions in output.h/c to generate the actual
HTML pages where you can the stats of your web server.


Basically, "parser" will fill up the hashtables and
linked lists, and "output" will simply go over them in
an ordered manner and output them in a human-readable
manner,and make some convinient calculations like
"daily average of visits" by counting all visits and
dividing by the number of days.


The rest of things are just filler designed to add
nice features.

Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3150 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Search string by referrers.
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
You may try to use webdruid, in
http://www.webdruid.org

Here you have a nice sample page, look in the section
called "20 most used search phrases grouped per search
engine". Is this what you were searching for?:

http://www.webdruid.org/sample/usage_200307.html


Note that I helped improving the search engine list :)

Notice that this lists the search string by engine,
but it then does NOT list totals for every search
strings accross all search engines. You may ask the
original programmer (Fabien Chevalier) to add this
feature (probably he'll need to get paid) or you could
send me a private email and discuss the posibility of
getting paid for adding it myself (I already wanted to
do it, but it costs time and I can only do it if I get
paid).


--- rknaak05 <rknaak05@...> wrote:

>
> I agree I think this is a much needed feature in
> webalizer.  I am
> actually looking for a programmer to add this
> feature and a few others
> into webalizer.  If you area contract programmer and
> want to discuss
> specifics, please contact me.
>
> Rob
>
> --- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, waldo kitty
> <wkitty42@a...> wrote:
> > Jason Novak wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to understand whether or not
> webalizer has the capability
> > > to report on search string by referrers.  I know
> you can group
> > > referrers which is nice but I'm looking for
> something that can show
> > > the search string that's being typed from
> whatever search site.
> > >
> > > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > webalizer does do the search strings...
> >
> > FWIW: this may be sacriledge in this group, but
> there is also
> awstats which does this function and more...
> >
> > --
> >         _\/
> >        (@@)                      Waldo Kitty,
> Waldo's Place USA
> > __ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________
> telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
> > _|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____
> http://www.wpusa.dynip.com
> > ____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____
> ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com
> > _|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____
> wkitty42 -at- alltel.net
>
>
>
>


Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3151 From: "rknaak05" <rknaak05@...>
Date: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Subject: Re: Search string by referrers.
rknaak05
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In webalizer@yahoogroups.com, p_d_burton@c... wrote:
> Do you specifically need the search strings to be grouped by referrer?

Yes that is exactly what I need.  I was also looking for the ability
to have some of the statistic exported on a daily basis to a database
(postgresql ideally) so that long term trends can be observed.

Rob

#3152 From: "guy_merritt" <guy@...>
Date: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:41 pm
Subject: Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache'
guy_merritt
Send Email Send Email
 
Racing around here like a madam as I have to be at work in 20
minutes.  I upgraded from RedHat 7.3 to RedHat Enterprise Linux last
night.  Everything is fine EXCEPT

when I run webalizer it seems to read the apache logs alright
(creating the .html stats page) but the terminal, as opposed to the
standard output, says : "Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache'
(/etc/webalizer.conf)" and the same thing for 'DNS Children'.   What
is going on with this?  Any help is greatly appreciated.....  had a
bunch of bad media and was up almost all night just trying to
install RedHat - that's a new one...

I think the version of webalizer is 2.01-09


Thanks very much

Guy Merritt

#3153 From: "Guy Merritt" <guy@...>
Date: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:32 pm
Subject: Warning: Invalid keyword
guy_merritt
Send Email Send Email
 
Racing around here like a madam as I have to be at work in 20 minutes.  I upgraded from RedHat 7.3 to RedHat Enterprise Linux last night.  Everything is fine EXCEPT 
 
when I run webalizer it seems to read the apache logs alright (creating the .html stats page) but the terminal, as opposed to the standard output, says : "Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache' (/etc/webalizer.conf)" and the same thing for 'DNS Children'.   What is going on with this?  Any help is greatly appreciated.....  had a bunch of bad media and was up almost all night just trying to install RedHat - that's a new one...
 
I think the version of webalizer is 2.01-09
 
 
Thanks very much
 
Guy Merritt
 
 
 
 

#3154 From: Enric Naval <enventa2000@...>
Date: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache'
enventa2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Probably your version of webalizer does not support
DNS resolving. This means that the visitor's IPs will
not be translated to its corresponding domains.

If you look at your "Total Sites" lists you will
probably notice that there are only IPs, instead of a
mix of IPs and domains. Unless, of course, you already
have DNS resolving activated in Apache (look for
HostnameLookups in httpd.conf).


--- guy_merritt <guy@...> wrote:

>
> Racing around here like a madam as I have to be at
> work in 20
> minutes.  I upgraded from RedHat 7.3 to RedHat
> Enterprise Linux last
> night.  Everything is fine EXCEPT
>
> when I run webalizer it seems to read the apache
> logs alright
> (creating the .html stats page) but the terminal, as
> opposed to the
> standard output, says : "Warning: Invalid keyword
> 'DNSCache'
> (/etc/webalizer.conf)" and the same thing for 'DNS
> Children'.   What
> is going on with this?  Any help is greatly
> appreciated.....  had a
> bunch of bad media and was up almost all night just
> trying to
> install RedHat - that's a new one...
>
> I think the version of webalizer is 2.01-09
>
>
> Thanks very much
>
> Guy Merritt
>
>
>
>


Enric Naval
Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
GRIHO webalizer.conf
http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#3155 From: "Guy Merritt" <guy@...>
Date: Sat Mar 19, 2005 3:25 am
Subject: Re: Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache'
guy_merritt
Send Email Send Email
 
I had inadvertently chosen "webserver" at the beginning of the install....I
removed the rpm and the thing works fine (I compile it)...

Thanks though..

Guy Merritt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Enric Naval" <enventa2000@...>
To: <webalizer@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [webalizer] Warning: Invalid keyword 'DNSCache'


>
> Probably your version of webalizer does not support
> DNS resolving. This means that the visitor's IPs will
> not be translated to its corresponding domains.
>
> If you look at your "Total Sites" lists you will
> probably notice that there are only IPs, instead of a
> mix of IPs and domains. Unless, of course, you already
> have DNS resolving activated in Apache (look for
> HostnameLookups in httpd.conf).
>
>
> --- guy_merritt <guy@...> wrote:
>
>>
>> Racing around here like a madam as I have to be at
>> work in 20
>> minutes.  I upgraded from RedHat 7.3 to RedHat
>> Enterprise Linux last
>> night.  Everything is fine EXCEPT
>>
>> when I run webalizer it seems to read the apache
>> logs alright
>> (creating the .html stats page) but the terminal, as
>> opposed to the
>> standard output, says : "Warning: Invalid keyword
>> 'DNSCache'
>> (/etc/webalizer.conf)" and the same thing for 'DNS
>> Children'.   What
>> is going on with this?  Any help is greatly
>> appreciated.....  had a
>> bunch of bad media and was up almost all night just
>> trying to
>> install RedHat - that's a new one...
>>
>> I think the version of webalizer is 2.01-09
>>
>>
>> Thanks very much
>>
>> Guy Merritt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Enric Naval
> Estudiante de Informática de Gestión en la Udl (Lleida)
> GRIHO webalizer.conf
> http://griho.udl.es/webalizer/webalizer.conf.txt
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> Webalizer homepage: http://www.webalizer.org
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

#3156 From: "raysloan1" <ray@...>
Date: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:20 pm
Subject: Hits v Visits
raysloan1
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

I am sure that this question must have been asked before, but please
bear with me as I am new to the group; could someone please explain
to me the difference between 'Visits' and 'Hits' ?  Thanks in advance

Cheers.

Ray

Messages 3127 - 3156 of 3841   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help