aha-
   I had been looking at something called lpasword, not 1password.

Thanks,downloaded and,indeed,it imported everything from
WebConfidential quite well.
Probably will use both aps in tandem as security.

Barbara


At 10:46 PM -0400 10/15/09, gregg hillmar wrote:
>
>
><http://agilewebsolutions.com/products/1Password>http://agilewebsolutions.com/p\
roducts/1Password
>
>right to the source...
>g.
>_____________________
>gregg hillmar
>scenic & lighting design
><http://www.hillmardesign.com>http://www.hillmardesign.com
>Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
><http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com>http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
>
>"Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt.
>Dance like no one's watching."
>-Satchel Paige
>
>On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Barbara Passman wrote:
>
>>  I started looking but all I found were older versions of 1Password.
>>  NO need to trade one older ap for another.
>>
>>  Sincerely
>>  Barbara
>>
>>  At 10:36 PM -0700 10/14/09, Jim Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Barbara Passman wrote:
>>>
>>>>  It is just mucho work to manually move so many records to another
>>>>  application.
>>>>
>>>  But you don't need to do it manually. You can export your records
>>>  from
>>>  WebConfidential, then import them into 1Password.
>>>
>>>  1Password's integration with browsers is superb. If you have more
>>>  than one
>>>  Mac, you can use dropbox to automatically keep your password data
>>>  in sync on
>>>  the two machines. You owe it to your self to at least look at it.
>>>
>>>  Jim Robertson
>>>  --
>>>
>>>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------
>>
>>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "jamesrob328i" <jamesrob@...> wrote:
> Guess you didn't look very hard. There have been TWENTY minor updates to
> 1Password this calendar year, and they're all (as were all other
> versions) universal binaries.

True,but don't forget the reason there *has* to be so many updates (which
frankly would be annoying if I were a 1Password user): the way it integrates
with Safari is broken by each new Safari release! Of course there's no other way
since Safari doesn't have a plug-in architecture as flexible as the Firefox one,
so many of those Safari "plug-ins" are in fact misnamed clever hacks. Read this
for more insight into this:
http://www.macjournals.com/news/inputmanagerhacks.html

But I agree, besides this point, that though one piece of software may see too
many updates, the other sees far less too few, and an Intel version is needed
years after the first Intel Mac and years after the last PowerPC Mac has been
sold!

-Thomas

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, Barbara Passman
<barbpassman@...> wrote:
>
> I started looking but all I found were older versions of 1Password.
> NO need to trade one older ap for another.
>
> Sincerely
> Barbara
>
Guess you didn't look very hard. There have been TWENTY minor updates to
1Password this calendar year, and they're all (as were all other
versions) universal binaries. 1Password 3 is available as an open beta.
It's a 64-bit binary for Intel processors. At the moment, the latest
version of 1Password, 2.11.0, is fully compliant with Snow Leopard
except that it requires Safari to run as a 32-bit process.

Contrast that with WebConfidential, which is still PowerPC code and
hasn't really been touched except for patches of lethal bugs in a few
years. One product is actively being masssaged and improved, the other
basically hasn't been touched in quite some time. I'm not saying it's
useless, but it's not contemporary code and requires Rosetta to run. No
WAY is 1Password another "older app."

Jim Robertson

http://agilewebsolutions.com/products/1Password

right to the source...
g.
_____________________
gregg hillmar
scenic & lighting design
http://www.hillmardesign.com
Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com

"Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt.
Dance like no one's watching."
                   -Satchel Paige

On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Barbara Passman wrote:

> I started looking but all I found were older versions of 1Password.
> NO need to trade one older ap for another.
>
> Sincerely
> Barbara
>
> At 10:36 PM -0700 10/14/09, Jim Robertson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Barbara Passman wrote:
>>
>>> It is just mucho work to manually move so many records to another
>>> application.
>>>
>> But you don't need to do it manually. You can export your records
>> from
>> WebConfidential, then import them into 1Password.
>>
>> 1Password's integration with browsers is superb. If you have more
>> than one
>> Mac, you can use dropbox to automatically keep your password data
>> in sync on
>> the two machines. You owe it to your self to at least look at it.
>>
>> Jim Robertson
>> --
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/29889 will solve all
your problems.

> I started looking but all I found were older versions of 1Password.
> NO need to trade one older ap for another.
>
> Sincerely
> Barbara
>
> At 10:36 PM -0700 10/14/09, Jim Robertson wrote:
> >
> >
> >Barbara Passman wrote:
> >
> >> It is just mucho work to manually move so many records to another
> >> application.
> >>
> >But you don't need to do it manually. You can export your records
> from
> >WebConfidential, then import them into 1Password.
> >
> >1Password's integration with browsers is superb. If you have more
> than one
> >Mac, you can use dropbox to automatically keep your password data
> in sync on
> >the two machines. You owe it to your self to at least look at it.
> >
> >Jim Robertson
> >--
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I started looking but all I found were older versions of 1Password.
NO need to trade one older ap for another.

Sincerely
Barbara

At 10:36 PM -0700 10/14/09, Jim Robertson wrote:
>
>
>Barbara Passman wrote:
>
>>  It is just mucho work to manually move so many records to another
>>  application.
>>
>But you don't need to do it manually. You can export your records from
>WebConfidential, then import them into 1Password.
>
>1Password's integration with browsers is superb. If you have more than one
>Mac, you can use dropbox to automatically keep your password data in sync on
>the two machines. You owe it to your self to at least look at it.
>
>Jim Robertson
>--
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "cpycgerry" <gerry@...> wrote:
>
> Thank You sf_bambooken.  I had one experience with the "windowserver
crash bug".  I hadn't even heard of it.  But the symptoms fit exactly
what happened a few weeks ago while I was using QUICKEN; which also uses
ROSETTA  Luckily Quicken does enough checkpoint saving that I didn't
lose much.
>
> However, I have never had the problem with WebConfidential on Leopard
or Snow Leopard.
>
I did not intend to imply that windowserver crashes had been linked
specifically to Webconfidential. However, the rumors are that it
involves Rosetta. Given that, I'm trying as much as possible to
eliminate anything that requires Rosetta from my own environment.
Personally, I've not used Webconfidential now for almost 21 months. I
continue to monitor this group because I liked it so much when it was
being actively developed. 1Password has a more complicated interface,
but it does more things, too, and there's an iPhone version as well.

Jim Robertson

Barbara Passman wrote:

> It is just mucho work to  manually move so many records to another
> application.
>
But you donıt need to do it manually. You can export your records from
WebConfidential, then import them into 1Password.

1Passwordıs integration with browsers is superb. If you have more than one
Mac, you can use dropbox to automatically keep your password data in sync on
the two machines. You owe it to your self to at least look at it.

Jim Robertson
--




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:16 AM, Detlef Schmitt wrote:

> Regarding migration of data, is there a way to import WC data into
> 1Passport easily?

Yes.
One of the choices in 1Password to import from from is
WebConfidential. You may end up with extraneous passwords and or
serial numerbs but that's a small matter compared to having to
manually enter everything
--
Rich Hansen
taobh@...

@iridiumtrader
I agree with you, word by word!

Unfortunately I have one major problem since 10.6.1: I described my
settings in message #184. Since SnowL it is (mostly) not possible to
open the file on my iDisk with WC. The icon looks like a "nothing".
Double-click -> E/A error (what ever that means).  That NEVER occurs
under Leopard!

I'm very unhappy and store my WC-file now on my local disk as in
former times.

Hope as well, that Alco well be able to program a new version!
--



Am 14.10.2009 um 16:38 schrieb iridiumtrader:

> As others have said, WC 3.8 works perfectly fine in Snow Leopard. I
> have not encountered any probs (using OS 10.6.1)
>
> I think the reason a lot of people want to keep using WC is that it
> does its job very well, keeping things simple. You get a single
> password file that is fully encrypted and reasonably small. WC
> itself is a small low profile app.
>
> For some reason (this is of course subjective) I feel my data is
> much safer in WC than in more fancy/sexy apps like 1password. I am
> happy that there is no interaction between the web-browsers and WP;
> that data is not picked up in the background. I'm also happy that
> the WP password file is totally independent from the MacOS keychain
> or anything else.
>
> I would obviously welcome a WC upgrade to make the app native and
> avoid the need for Rosetta. An iPhone companion app would be great
> as well.
>
> 1password is a nice looking app, but not a good replacement for WC
> as far as I'm concerned. Again it depends on the specific usage.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thank You sf_bambooken.  I had one experience with the "windowserver crash bug".
I hadn't even heard of it.  But the symptoms fit exactly what happened a few
weeks ago while I was using QUICKEN; which also uses ROSETTA  Luckily Quicken
does enough checkpoint saving that I didn't lose much.

However, I have never had the problem with WebConfidential on Leopard or Snow
Leopard.

As others have said, WC 3.8 works perfectly fine in Snow Leopard. I have not
encountered any probs (using OS 10.6.1)

I think the reason a lot of people want to keep using WC is that it does its job
very well, keeping things simple. You get a single password file that is fully
encrypted and reasonably small. WC itself is a small low profile app.

For some reason (this is of course subjective) I feel my data is much safer in
WC than in more fancy/sexy apps like 1password. I am happy that there is no
interaction between the web-browsers and WP; that data is not picked up in the
background. I'm also happy that the WP password file is totally independent from
the MacOS keychain or anything else.

I would obviously welcome a WC upgrade to make the app native and avoid the need
for Rosetta. An iPhone companion app would be great as well.

1password is a nice looking app, but not a good replacement for WC as far as I'm
concerned. Again it depends on the specific usage.

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "jamesrob328i" <jamesrob@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "sf_bambooken" <bambooken@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've been running SnowLeopard and WC 3.8
> > Not having any problems here
> >
> I continue to use a few programs that require Rosetta, but I do so
> fearfully, because of the "Windowserver crash bug" that seems to be tied
> to Rosetta (and perhaps to specific applications running under Rosetta,
> though that's not clear). What happens is that the user's entire session
> abruptly terminates with a blank blue screen, followed a few seconds
> later by the Mac user account login screen. All the discussions I've
> read about this refer to it as linked to Rosetta. The problem actually
> predates Snow Leopard (it happened to me once under 10.5.? (I can't
> remember which Leopard update).
>
> And, of course, there's the even more ominous Snow Leopard bug that
> trashes the user's entire user account if by mistake the user allows the
> "Guest Account" to be used. That second bug hasn't been tied, so far as
> I know, to Rosetta, but the first is enough to make me reticent to run
> anything that requires interpretation of PowerPC code if there's a
> viable alternative. To be honest, it's been so long since there's been
> any evidence of real work on WebConfidential, and its featureset has
> long been overwhelmed by 1Password, and 1Password is so inexpensive that
> I cannot imagine any reason that someone who can afford to upgrade
> his/her Mac beyond a PPC machine and his/her OS beyond one that
> 1Password doesn't support wouldn't switch. But that's just my opinion. I
> loved WebConfidential when it was being worked on and improved. I've
> read that Alco was ill and delayed switching because of that, but I no
> longer see any reason (especially with the scary Rosetta bugs) to take
> risks with the rest of my computing environment.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

I have never had any problems with Rosetta.
Not in 10.5 and up to know also not in 10.6.
Therefore Rosetta problems are not an argument for me to switch.

On the other hand I can see sometime down the road the support
for PowerPC programs disappearing as support for OS9 disappeared.

That means that if WebConfidencial will not go Intel in the near future
its days are numbered.

At the moment I am still hanging in there waiting for a WC upgrade.

The main reason why I am reluctant to switch is because I have a ton
of passwords etc. stored in WC. It's going to be painful to migrate all
that data to another program.

Regarding migration of data, is there a way to import WC data into
1Passport easily?






but you guys have made me a little bit nervous.






On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:26 PM, jamesrob328i wrote:

>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "sf_bambooken" <bambooken@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've been running SnowLeopard and WC 3.8
> > Not having any problems here
> >
> I continue to use a few programs that require Rosetta, but I do so
> fearfully, because of the "Windowserver crash bug" that seems to be
> tied
> to Rosetta (and perhaps to specific applications running under
> Rosetta,
> though that's not clear). What happens is that the user's entire
> session
> abruptly terminates with a blank blue screen, followed a few seconds
> later by the Mac user account login screen. All the discussions I've
> read about this refer to it as linked to Rosetta. The problem actually
> predates Snow Leopard (it happened to me once under 10.5.? (I can't
> remember which Leopard update).
>
> And, of course, there's the even more ominous Snow Leopard bug that
> trashes the user's entire user account if by mistake the user allows
> the
> "Guest Account" to be used. That second bug hasn't been tied, so far
> as
> I know, to Rosetta, but the first is enough to make me reticent to run
> anything that requires interpretation of PowerPC code if there's a
> viable alternative. To be honest, it's been so long since there's been
> any evidence of real work on WebConfidential, and its featureset has
> long been overwhelmed by 1Password, and 1Password is so inexpensive
> that
> I cannot imagine any reason that someone who can afford to upgrade
> his/her Mac beyond a PPC machine and his/her OS beyond one that
> 1Password doesn't support wouldn't switch. But that's just my
> opinion. I
> loved WebConfidential when it was being worked on and improved. I've
> read that Alco was ill and delayed switching because of that, but I no
> longer see any reason (especially with the scary Rosetta bugs) to take
> risks with the rest of my computing environment.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, "sf_bambooken" <bambooken@...>
wrote:
>
> I've been running SnowLeopard and WC 3.8
> Not having any problems here
>
I continue to use a few programs that require Rosetta, but I do so
fearfully, because of the "Windowserver crash bug" that seems to be tied
to Rosetta (and perhaps to specific applications running under Rosetta,
though that's not clear). What happens is that the user's entire session
abruptly terminates with a blank blue screen, followed a few seconds
later by the Mac user account login screen. All the discussions I've
read about this refer to it as linked to Rosetta. The problem actually
predates Snow Leopard (it happened to me once under 10.5.? (I can't
remember which Leopard update).

And, of course, there's the even more ominous Snow Leopard bug that
trashes the user's entire user account if by mistake the user allows the
"Guest Account" to be used. That second bug hasn't been tied, so far as
I know, to Rosetta, but the first is enough to make me reticent to run
anything that requires interpretation of PowerPC code if there's a
viable alternative. To be honest, it's been so long since there's been
any evidence of real work on WebConfidential, and its featureset has
long been overwhelmed by 1Password, and 1Password is so inexpensive that
I cannot imagine any reason that someone who can afford to upgrade
his/her Mac beyond a PPC machine and his/her OS beyond one that
1Password doesn't support wouldn't switch. But that's just my opinion. I
loved WebConfidential when it was being worked on and improved. I've
read that Alco was ill and delayed switching because of that, but I no
longer see any reason (especially with the scary Rosetta bugs) to take
risks with the rest of my computing environment.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I've been running SnowLeopard and WC 3.8
Not having any problems here


--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, Terry Pogue <tpogue@...> wrote:
>
> I am planning on installing Snow Leopard this next week. Is Web
> Confidential fine with Snow Leopard. I can't lost that.
> Thanks,
> terry
>
> http://www.terryanddave.com/Terry
> "My idea of pure heaven is to spend a day in the kitchen, peeling,
> chopping, and stirring while the words of a good book fill the air
> around me." Ruth Reichl
>

IF there were an easy import function I might switch applications.
But I like WC, I have gobs of records in it - switching would be a
small nightmare-and I hope Mr. Blom will do as he wrote me and
upgrade WC.
But thank you, have heard of 1Password.
Sincerely
Barbara

At 8:31 AM -0400 10/13/09, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
>
>
>Try 1Password. It works very nice and is SL ready.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Hendrik W. M. van Eeden
>
>On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:16 AM, bp1818 wrote:
>
>>  I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
>>  on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
>>  to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
>>  Webconfidential will work.
>>
>>  I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
>>
>>  --- In
>><mailto:webconfidential%40yahoogroups.com>webconfidential@yahoogroups.com,
>>gregg hillmar <gregg@...>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
>>  > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted. So I
>>  > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
>>  > >
>>  > > Henk
>>  >
>>  > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
>>  > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
>>  > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
>>  > g.
>>  > _____________________
>>  > gregg hillmar
>>  > scenic & lighting design
>>  > <http://www.hillmardesign.com>http://www.hillmardesign.com
>>  > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
>>  >
>><http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com>http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
>>  >
>>  > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
>>  > -Mark Twain
>>  >
>>
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thank you!
That is a relief
I have put off Snow Leopard primarily because of WC and Eudora.

Sincerely
Barbara

At 6:41 PM +0900 10/13/09, Detlef Schmitt wrote:
>
>
>I am using WC 3.8b4 in Snow Leopard with no problems.
>
>Detlef
>
>On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:16 PM, bp1818 wrote:
>
>>  I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
>>  on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
>>  to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
>>  Webconfidential will work.
>>
>>  I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
>>
>>  --- In
>><mailto:webconfidential%40yahoogroups.com>webconfidential@yahoogroups.com,
>>gregg hillmar <gregg@...>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
>>  > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted. So I
>>  > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
>>  > >
>>  > > Henk
>>  >
>>  > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
>>  > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
>>  > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
>>  > g.
>>  > _____________________
>>  > gregg hillmar
>>  > scenic & lighting design
>>  > <http://www.hillmardesign.com>http://www.hillmardesign.com
>>  > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
>>  >
>><http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com>http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
>>  >
>>  > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
>>  > -Mark Twain
>>  >
>>
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I upgraded to WC 3.8 and tested it.
3.8 also works fine in Snow Leopard.

But then I only use the most basic functions,
which is entering new passwords or deleting old ones
and looking up passwords.

I never used it for anything else.

Detlef




On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:06 AM, DavidA wrote:

> Detlef:
>
> Can you try using the latest version: 3.8 (which is not a beta
> version) and let us know if you have problems with Snow Leopard.
>
> Thanks. DA
>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, Detlef Schmitt
> <detlefschmitt@...> wrote:
> >
> > I am using WC 3.8b4 in Snow Leopard with no problems.
> >
> > Detlef
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:16 PM, bp1818 wrote:
> >
> > > I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS
> working
> > > on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I
> want
> > > to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
> > > Webconfidential will work.
> > >
> > > I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
> > >
> > > --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential
> would
> > > > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted.
> So I
> > > > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active
> development.
> > > > >
> > > > > Henk
> > > >
> > > > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming
> work on
> > > > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in
> this
> > > > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
> > > > g.
> > > > _____________________
> > > > gregg hillmar
> > > > scenic & lighting design
> > > > http://www.hillmardesign.com
> > > > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
> > > > http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
> > > >
> > > > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
> > > > -Mark Twain
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On 14/10/2009, at 7:46 am, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:

> It is very easy to copy to 1Password.

Oh I agree, but I'm very good at procrastinating. :-)

cheers,

Paul.

It is very easy to copy to 1Password.

Sincerely,

Hendrik W. M. van Eeden



On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Paul Baily wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On 14/10/2009, at 4:06 am, DavidA wrote:
>
> > Can you try using the latest version: 3.8 (which is not a beta
> > version) and let us know if you have problems with Snow Leopard.
>
> Running 3.8 final here under Snow Leopard since SL came out with no
> problems at all as far as I can tell. I've switched to 1Password a
> while ago but still use WC every now and then to look up old passwords
> or registrations I haven't got around to copying across.
>
> HTH, and cheers,
>
> Paul.
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

3.8 works fine on Snow Leopard. I too switched to 1Password

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Paul Baily <gen2lists@...> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On 14/10/2009, at 4:06 am, DavidA wrote:
>
> > Can you try using the latest version: 3.8 (which is not a beta
> > version) and let us know if you have problems with Snow Leopard.
>
> Running 3.8 final here under Snow Leopard since SL came out with no
> problems at all as far as I can tell. I've switched to 1Password a
> while ago but still use WC every now and then to look up old passwords
> or registrations I haven't got around to copying across.
>
> HTH, and cheers,
>
> Paul.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi all,

On 14/10/2009, at 4:06 am, DavidA wrote:

> Can you try using the latest version: 3.8 (which is not a beta
> version) and let us know if you have problems with Snow Leopard.

Running 3.8 final here under Snow Leopard since SL came out with no
problems at all as far as I can tell. I've switched to 1Password a
while ago but still use WC every now and then to look up old passwords
or registrations I haven't got around to copying across.

HTH, and cheers,

Paul.

Detlef:

Can you try using the latest version: 3.8 (which is not a beta version) and let
us know if you have problems with Snow Leopard.

Thanks. DA

--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, Detlef Schmitt <detlefschmitt@...>
wrote:
>
> I am using WC 3.8b4 in Snow Leopard with no problems.
>
> Detlef
>
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:16 PM, bp1818 wrote:
>
> > I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
> > on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
> > to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
> > Webconfidential will work.
> >
> > I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
> >
> > --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
> > >
> > > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
> > > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted. So I
> > > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
> > > >
> > > > Henk
> > >
> > > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
> > > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
> > > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
> > > g.
> > > _____________________
> > > gregg hillmar
> > > scenic & lighting design
> > > http://www.hillmardesign.com
> > > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
> > > http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
> > >
> > > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
> > > -Mark Twain
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Try 1Password.  It works very nice and is SL ready.

Sincerely,

Hendrik W. M. van Eeden



On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:16 AM, bp1818 wrote:

> I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
> on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
> to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
> Webconfidential will work.
>
> I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
> >
> > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
> > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted. So I
> > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
> > >
> > > Henk
> >
> > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
> > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
> > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
> > g.
> > _____________________
> > gregg hillmar
> > scenic & lighting design
> > http://www.hillmardesign.com
> > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
> > http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
> >
> > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
> > -Mark Twain
> >
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

It works fine in Snow Leopard, via Rosetta.

In late August, Alco wrote: "You need to install Rosetta.
However, the process is almost totally transparent. Once you launch
URL Manager Pro, Mac OS X will ask you to install Rosetta.

I did some quick tests and URL Manager Pro seems to run fine on Snow
Leopard"
On 13/10/2009, at 5:16 PM, bp1818 wrote:

> I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
> on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
> to move to Snow Leopard but  I can't migrate until I know
> Webconfidential will work.
>
> I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
>
>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
>>
>>>  I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
>>> not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted.  So I
>>> switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
>>>
>>> Henk
>>
>> More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
>> Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
>> round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
>> g.
>> _____________________
>> gregg hillmar
>> scenic & lighting design
>> http://www.hillmardesign.com
>> Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
>> http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
>>
>> "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
>> 		 -Mark Twain
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

I am using WC 3.8b4 in Snow Leopard with no problems.

Detlef



On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:16 PM, bp1818 wrote:

> I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working
> on an updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want
> to move to Snow Leopard but I can't migrate until I know
> Webconfidential will work.
>
> I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8
>
> --- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
> >
> > > I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
> > > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted. So I
> > > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
> > >
> > > Henk
> >
> > More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
> > Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
> > round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
> > g.
> > _____________________
> > gregg hillmar
> > scenic & lighting design
> > http://www.hillmardesign.com
> > Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
> > http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
> >
> > "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
> > -Mark Twain
> >
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I wrote Alco Blom in September and he wrote back that he IS working on an
updated version of Webconfidential. I inquired because I want to move to Snow
Leopard but  I can't migrate until I know Webconfidential will work.

I keep checking every few days but I still see only version 3.8


--- In webconfidential@yahoogroups.com, gregg hillmar <gregg@...> wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:
>
> >   I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
> > not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted.  So I
> > switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
> >
> > Henk
>
> More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
> Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
> round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
> g.
> _____________________
> gregg hillmar
> scenic & lighting design
> http://www.hillmardesign.com
> Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
> http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com
>
> "If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
> 		 -Mark Twain
>

On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Hendrik van Eeden wrote:

>   I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
> not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted.  So I
> switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.
>
> Henk

More recently, Alco popped by here and said he was resuming work on
Web Confidential. We haven't heard from him on this issue in this
round of emails, but that doesn't mean all is lost.
g.
_____________________
gregg hillmar
scenic & lighting design
http://www.hillmardesign.com
Author, LIGHT PLOT DECONSTRUCTED
http://www.lightplotdeconstructed.com

"If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything."
			 -Mark Twain

I read on the this forum some time ago that WebConfidential would
not be updated for Leopard and development would be halted.  So I
switched to Agile's 1Password, great app and active development.

Henk



On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:13 PM, JOSE LOPEZ ZENO wrote:

> BTW, I think I read somewhere that 1P has over 800k registered
> paying users. It is time for them to take that company public!
>
> Jose
>
> On Monday, September 14, 2009, at 01:27PM, "gregg hillmar"
<gregg@...
> > wrote:
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have all of my serial numbers for software in WebConfidental.  Looks
like time to revisit that built in encrypted stuff we get in our Apple
system as well as iPassword.
terry

http://www.terryanddave.com/Terry
"My idea of pure heaven is to spend a day in the kitchen, peeling,
chopping, and stirring while the words of a good book fill the air
around me." Ruth Reichl




On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:27 AM, gregg hillmar wrote:

> Likewise, I have mostly moved to 1Password for web use. I keep WebCon
> because it has serial numbers for much of my software and older
> hardware still there. Yes, it is possible to export and import those
> to 1password, but I like WebCon. I just dont open it very often, so
> opening under Rosetta is OK.
> g.
> __________