Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
webmink · Webmink Blog Discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
[Webmink : the blog] Who pays for open source?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #464 of 1371 |
RE: [Webmink : the blog] Who pays for open source?

Microsoft is planning new negative comparison marketing, starting with
Linux, Apache HTTPd, and MySQL, most likely reminiscent of their anti-OS/2
campaign.

ref: http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12803689

Another way of looking at it, however, is actually good for Open Source
supporters. The man in charge of the project at Microsoft, Martin Taylor,
says that the "the end-to-end scenarios is where things don't work quite as
well with Linux." But that is precisely where Open Source consultants and
integrators can find the Value Add proposition. That is where Open Source
differs from Free (as in money). Someone needs to provide support,
integration, deployment, enhancement, etc. Companies can either develop
that expertise in-house, or out-source. And in the longer run, Open Source
projects will evolve to make such tasks easier, as the lessons from
deployment are fed back into the development community.

--- Noel




Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:18 pm

noel_bergman
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #464 of 1371 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

In his recent posting on java.net Alan Williamson asks how open source software can ever be profitable. I believe his thinking confuses two different issues -...
Simon Phipps
the_webmink
Offline Send Email
Jul 30, 2003
5:04 am

I think that the potential profitability of open source has a lot to do with the licensing schema. I think BSD-style licensing can be profitable, but GPL-style...
Anne Thomas Manes
annemanes
Offline Send Email
Jul 30, 2003
1:45 pm

I think that's why many of the open source advocates I have spoken to have actually been very cautious of the GPL. While it facilitates the community it may...
Simon Phipps
the_webmink
Offline Send Email
Jul 30, 2003
1:51 pm

... When the FSF talks about Freedom, it is a bit oxymoronic. The GPL-driven concept of Open Source aren't about freedom. The GPL is about mandating ...
Noel J. Bergman
noel_bergman
Offline Send Email
Jul 31, 2003
5:26 pm

Microsoft is planning new negative comparison marketing, starting with Linux, Apache HTTPd, and MySQL, most likely reminiscent of their anti-OS/2 campaign. ...
Noel J. Bergman
noel_bergman
Offline Send Email
Jul 31, 2003
4:18 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help