daviddennard@... wrote:

>There is another list set up for folks to try and undermine my work, perhaps
>you ought to go over there.
>
>
was he talking about the viktorschaubergergroup in this?
just wondering - it would be of great help if someone here knew which
list he was talking about - i havent come across that many
suction/implosion/whirlpower/whirlpool/vortex-based lists that would nod
towards water, or pretty much anything.

>>Hi,
>>I found proof of the concept in the books and works of Weyher, (XIX)
>>But I have to make them available for you all now.
>>The whirl makes the thing work.
>>Weyher was able to make tornados in the air - of course it's not acycloneor
whirlpool,
>>But the good thing isIt was in open air, with just some whirling device to
start theaction...And there it goes near the idea.The whirling make a big
"succion" effect, and hop, water startsmoving inthe air,Amazing !
>>Here it is pretty much the same, but in a whirlpool shape.The whirling makes a
synchronicity - a union, kind of a field,inside thebodies of water.The bigger,
the better.The field must be aetheric in substance, so gravity +electromagnetic
shifteffects.Gravity vector can goes "up" or "down" (because gravity is a
compoundvector, as for
>>Terrestrial magnetic). So gravity/levitation is difficult toseparate.The idea
of using big bodies, heavy ones is better. Because thekineticsinside can be very
strong forLittle speed.Anyway the whole system, with the centripetal-centrifugal
movement,makes itloose some temperature (degrees),And it's even easier to
contain energy in it...Regards,
>>Cedric
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>