... Hi George, I agree with you and suggest that we stabilize the current Win32Forth for version 14 and start no new line of developments. I also hope you and...
... version ... finished, ... starts a ... Win32Forth ... I agree. ... another pressed. ... navigator. ... and seems to lock. ... I did a bit of work on this...
Hi, I'd simply like to define a command that repeats x times other commands that follow it but I can't remember how to do it, can you help me? For example if...
... Hi Olivier, Perhaps the following might help a bit: In catalog.f I used almost the same idea in for-all-records When you change for-all-records and...
... sorry for multiposting, the errors in my examples (and my poor english) if you use this version, you are able to use all "older" numbers on the stack ... 1...
Hello, I agree with you that a new snapshot is due. We would get a wider feedback and bug reports. If the process of creating a snapshot is simple, I see no...
... I/m not sure how much work is needed, since Dirk Busch normally builds them. The files in the win32forth-extsrc\extsrc\installer are the scripts used for...
... I think it would cost me one or two Hours to build new setups from the current CVS content. But first I have to search for the tool's I need in the Net;...
I agree with George, We already have a lot to do. Let's not make things more difficult by changing the SYSTEM directory. Jos ... == 4ePost: 2,946 bytes in...
... are ... to ... to ... Do what I do; keep the old PC just in case (though you still have to find the program, plus have room for the old PCs). ... Probably...
Hello, Despite George and Jos seem to be against supressing the SYSTEM dictionary, I don't give up (althought with some water in my wine): The system...
... version ... (from ... finished, ... starts a ... Win32Forth ... another pressed. ... Don't think this is due to the new console. I am getting the same...
... Some of those were caused by using things like EVALUATE, which isn't much use in a TURNKEYed application, given names are discarded anyway. ... They don't...
... isn't ... Of course. I was talking about more subtile ones, for example when you move code without being aware that it was in some dictionary and put it in...
... If we can get rid of IN-SYSTEM and friedns it would be fine, I never liked them and I never liked \in-system-ok for shure. But I think we spend to mutch...
... much ... making ... I'm not sure about totally getting rid of them but reducing the need for them (hence my point of marking some words as safe to use, so...
... and ... It's not that common to move code around, and not difficult to check which area it was in and arrange for it to be the same, it comes with ...
... Reading your proposal first I thought: What does that mean? At one time you proposed to do a "clean-up". You ended with reorganizing and changing a lot of...
... The STC-Version has the turn-key problem. That is in fact killing it at this moment. Jos == 4ePost: 276 bytes in mail. Elapsed time to buffer: .000047 sec....
Hello, ... to ... You are right, and finally my interpretation is that it is not worth keeping all the burden of the SYSTEM dictionary to gain 35 or even 40%...
Camille, I admire the effort you are expending trying to make Win32Forth better. I manage to read the list messages and post an occasional one of my own every...
... better. I ... own every ... demonstrated. ... sleeping ... energy are ... dreaming ... productive. ... attempting to ... It's not ... changes - ... But...
I sure would like to know what you've done to win32forth. I have to go through weird gyrations to compile my old programs that alwaysw compiled and ran...
Hi Charles, Nice to see an old block-guy around. On what version of win32forth did your program run before you tried it on version 6.11.09? Even in Version:...
... I didn't remove occurences of abs>rel and rel>abs (except a couple of them remaining in sources). I did remove abs>rel and rel>abs themselves, and, then,...