For example - FaceBook has 2 datacenters in the US - one in Cali and one in Virginia.
One is effective at serving the west coast and central US - the Virginia datacenter is more adept at serving traffic on the East Coast + Europe.
Chicago in theory is closer to center... so if you had to have one datacenter it would provide neutral latency on both coasts...
Cheers,
Zubin.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Arun Khan <arun.k.khan@...> wrote:
On Friday 20 Mar 2009, Saifi Khan wrote:Real estate is cheaper in Chicago. Taxes are lower in IL. Gas was
> Hi all:
>
> Does anybody know where is a DataCenter more cheaper for
> comparable services ?
>
> - California
> - Chicago
>
> In recent times, there are many orgs. that have migrated their
> datacenters from California to Chicago.
>
> Any observations ?
cheaper in IL (at least when I lived there).
In short, Cost of Living is cheaper in Chicago resulting in lower CTCs
vis a vis California.
On a related note: Austin, TX is cheaper in comparison to Chicago. For
the same reasons, states like Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota are
beginning to attract the Tech sector.
-- Arun Khan