Here it comes:

http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/manifesto/

I hope I am not forgetting anyone's advice. Please send your comments
in. If someone feels comfortable signing a draft, just shoot me an email
and I'll make sure your email is added right away.

Comments from vendors of reformatting proxies are equally welcome.

As an aside, I am thrilled by the idea that we are achieving in one day
10 times more than what W3C has achieved in 6 months with their Content
Transformation Task Force.

Luca


Tom Hume wrote:
> Given that these are things we can all agree on, there's nothing to
> stop anyone publishing them under any name they'd like. But I'd note
> that a militant-sounding pro-developer stance hasn't delivered much in
> the way of results yet so would personally shy away from promoting a
> document under such a name, implying that other rules aren't ethical,
> or that developers are some sort of political movement. We're also not
> in a position to impose "rules".
>
> "Guidelines for Responsible Reformatting" might be a bit less emotive?
>
> On 22 Mar 2008, at 11:01, Luca Passani wrote:
>
>
>> "Rules for Ethical Reformatting: A Developer Manifesto" (to be
>> abbreviated at "Manifesto for Good Reformattin
>>