> -----Original Message-----
> From: seth@... [mailto:seth@...]On Behalf Of
> seth@...
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:13 PM
> To: peter green
> Cc: qmail@...
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: hostile
>
>
> This is typical, a gratuitis personal attack based on an incorrect
> characterization of something you imagine I might have said. If
> _you_ look
> through the archives you will not find any such "little nuggets
> of usefulness"
> as you describe.
>
> But that is beside the point. It is apparent that you care only
> about your own
> egos, and couldn't care less if qmail dies tomorrow. Look in the
> mirror, don't
> attack other people.
>
> On 13-Jan-2003 peter green wrote:
> > Seth, Blair, et al,
> >
> > Your conduct demonstrates the very stupidity that Charles and other list
> > regulars strive to minimize. If either of you (or anyone else
> involved in
> > this thread from the "the qmail list regulars are so mean!
> *sniff*" angle)
> > had looked through the archives, you would realize that all of your
> > brilliant little nuggets of uselessness have been raised before.
> >
> > Drop it. Start talking about qmail or shut up and leave.
> >
> > /pg
> > --
> > Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : pcg@...
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > descendent is isaac seay
> > -- http://www.googlism.com/
> > This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
> > along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
> > mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> >
> > Content preview: Seth, Blair, et al, Your conduct demonstrates the very
> > stupidity that Charles and other list regulars strive to minimize. If
> > either of you (or anyone else involved in this thread from the "the
> > qmail list regulars are so mean! *sniff*" angle) had looked
> through the
> > archives, you would realize that all of your brilliant little nuggets
> > of uselessness have been raised before. [...]
> >
> > Content analysis details: (-3.20 points, 5 required)
> > IN_REP_TO (-0.8 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
> > REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
> > SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE (-0.3 points) Short signature present (no
> empty lines)
> > USER_AGENT_MUTT (-1.6 points) User-Agent header indicates a
> non-spam MUA
> > (Mutt)
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: seth@...
> Date: 13-Jan-2003
> Time: 16:11:21
>
> This message was sent by XFMail
> ----------------------------------
>