Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> Yes they should -- It's a known bug in the spec. (actually, there are
quite a few
> errors, discrepancies, and ambiguities in the spec)
> (The WSDL spec is a "W3C Note", which means it is verbatim what the
vendors
> submitted to W3C, so it isn't W3C's fault that the spec has errors.
The vendors
> never revised the WSDL 1.1 specification, therefore it stands as is.
You should
> consult the WS-I Basic Profile to resolve any questions you have
about the spec.)
That makes sense, thanks for the explanation!
Jason
(So there ARE people on this list besides spammers!)