Just wondering here.. If you create a script that basically says 'when this switch goes ON then turn these two lights OFF" what should the source address of...
PS I do realise this masqerading as another device would require faking a source address and borrowing its UID and that seems intrinsically wrong to me....
I'm having a strange problem and we had something a little similar at UKHA2004. - I have Viewer running in hub mode and the Homeseer beta. I have a script that...
... The sending app is different - could sending from *within* Viewer use a different mechanism to sending *via* Viewer? (Stuart?) ... It would be pretty...
... There's one big contradiction here though - Viewer running on the remote machine (the one with Watcher installed) sees both messages whereas Watcher on...
... xap-hub eth0 xap-hub eth1 etc. For some debug output that may be useful: xap-hub eth0 3639 5 where 5 is the debug level (and 3639 is the UDP port) P....
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 08:34:33 +0100, "Patrick Lidstone \(Personal ... No, I don't believe so as ultimately it all sinks down into xFx itself - the code is common...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:45:09 +0100, "Kevin Hawkins" ... It's certainly possible as it populates the fields with default data I think. Mostly I do detect errors...
... What I'm thinking is that when HomeSeer for example sends its message.display out it doesn't in any way use your hub - it simply sends the UDP packet out...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:08:30 +0100, "Kevin Hawkins" ... Oh, that old nugget! That made it into Listener. I don't honestly remember the status of that code now....
Right... Narrowed this down a bit. No problem as far as I can tell with any xFX app. If I remove the hub on the machine on which Watcher is running then it...
A question.. The HomeSeer application manifests itself as several xAP applications on the network and each one generates a heartbeat - within each virtual...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:06:49 +0100, "Kevin Hawkins" ... Remotely I don't think a Hub should care as the message doesn't originate locally, so it won't connect,...
... Yes - that's how I saw it too the remote hub just forwards it and should apply no intelligence at all. ... Hmm - a little worried here - are you saying...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:40:53 +0100, "Kevin Hawkins" ... Except for validation perhaps? ... That last bit sounds right - I definitely did not do anything on ...
I think there's a lot to be said for 1 UID per port. How else would you be able to tell whether or not an app had "gone away" and been replaced by a new app...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:49:03 +0100, "Patrick Lidstone \(Personal ... From what I can recall (I haven't really touched this area of code in ages, apart from the...
... I think I can answer that one, because xAPHomevision works in (almost) the same way, for the same reasons :-) xAPHomevision and xAPHomeseer both use...
Bit of a wild guess here. I wonder if this may be down to a missing chr(10) at the end of a message or maybe even a crlf in there somewhere. Once viewer has...
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 17:01:22 +0100, James Traynor <james@...> ... Because of the class I use to read in the data, xAPFramework-based applications don't...
... Patrick's works very well with it. I think the issue came because of the internal separation and routing of messages that xFx does that a more simple hub...
... To follow from this I remember when making the createxapmessage function for use in homeseer scripts that it would add a chr(10) is missing at the end and...
Seems to me that the port/uid topic is a result of trying to use the header to identify items that are logical rather than physical entities. (i.e. the...
Just noticed this using v 1.2.1.5 - although v1.2.1.4 seemed OK The following message caused an error during its processing. Specified argument was out of the...
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:12:56 +0100, "Kevin Hawkins" ... xFx doesn't like a port number of "-32768" in the xAP message. I think that's more your end?? I could...
Oops sorry- absolutely right !!! - old OCX - I totallty missed the - sign - although I picked it up a day or so back and P updated the OCX to correct it - now...
There was an intermediate release of the OCX which got the ephemeral ports wrong - but only Kevin had a copy of this, perhaps he has picked the wrong version...
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:24:36 +0100, "Patrick Lidstone \(Personal ... I think the message appears to be coming in with a parameter "Port=-32768" and as it's less...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
