To give an example. As far as I can think we might end-up with a framework of Context's. Each Context is a sub-domain model with its own set of Concepts, Terms...
Gerard Freriks
gfrer@...
Jun 1, 1998 7:18 am
2290
Peter> Peter Murray-Rust <URL:mailto:peter@...> => In article <3.0.1.16.19980529231407.383f3e1e@...>, => Peter wrote: Peter> I am...
Toby Speight
tms@...
Jun 1, 1998 10:14 am
2291
Let me say first of all that (after wading through the gazillion messages posted during and after SGML/XML Europe) this is an incredibly exciting and valuable...
Matthew Gertner
matthew@...
Jun 1, 1998 10:17 am
2292
IMO: No. By allowing linking of element type definitions (cf. my previous post) this can be done more cleanly by extending the element type in a separate...
Matthew Gertner
matthew@...
Jun 1, 1998 10:17 am
2293
It looks like RDF is no-where near the stage where XSchema could do much to support it yet. There is still the big fat warning on its header. In particular,...
Rick Jelliffe
ricko@...
Jun 1, 1998 11:07 am
2294
... Here are a few of my concerns with the word type: * I think that it implies a set of legal operations, (e.g. the boolean type has logical operations, the...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 12:06 pm
2295
... I disagree a little. The schema itself is not the assertion. The HTML DTD does not assert anything. Some other declaration *points to* (or in the DOCTYPE...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 12:06 pm
2296
Through discussions on XML=DEV, I believe that I have clarified my own thinking on names, namespaces and schemas quite a bit. The fog is lifting. I believe...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 12:08 pm
2297
... This is all true. But at the end of the day, a complete document either conforms to a schema or it doesn't, even if only half of its elements or attributes...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 12:17 pm
2298
[Forwarded for Peter Murray-Rust] [Toby Speight] ... [PMR] I think this is exactly the sort of question that we shall be debating in 2-3 days. I hadn't thought...
Simon St.Laurent
SimonStL@...
Jun 1, 1998 1:15 pm
2299
Presume XSchema rules are similar to XSL rules, and are of the form: <XSchema:Rule> <!-- Pattern --> <!-- Constraint --> <XSchema:ContentModel> ... ...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 1:17 pm
2300
... save my ... This is admittedly not at all clear in the April 15 draft of the spec, but the children of an Attribute are the values (the String methods are ...
Mike Champion
mcc@...
Jun 1, 1998 1:52 pm
2301
[Forwarded for Peter Murray-Rust] [Paul Prescod] ... [... XSL-like rule/pattern clipped ...] ... I like this proposal. As Paul hints, we shouldn't attempt more...
Simon St.Laurent
SimonStL@...
Jun 1, 1998 2:07 pm
2302
I hope to provide a status report on XSchema every Monday morning, summarizing the current position of the specification's development. Please don't reply to...
Simon St.Laurent
SimonStL@...
Jun 1, 1998 2:51 pm
2303
[Paul Prescod:] ... If that's true, then that's GREAT! However, I keep stumbling over a problem in my own mind. (Maybe it's just too obvious for me to see...
Steven R. Newcomb
srn@...
Jun 1, 1998 3:22 pm
2304
... No. It's an excellent question. ... You are right: knowing that an object exists is not enough. To do something useful with it we need more. In some cases...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 4:20 pm
2305
... Schema languages will usually also provide support for authoring, by allowing elements and attributes to be validated individually. ... I don't feel that...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 4:20 pm
2306
(Second try after a mysterious failure at ic.ac.uk; my apologies if you see this posting more than once.) I have posted a proposed draft XSchema document at ...
John Cowan
cowan@...
Jun 1, 1998 4:36 pm
2307
... No kidding. Actually, the people I talk to worry more about rendering, or running Java code on, said declared-but-opaque object, but validation ...
Tim Bray
tbray@...
Jun 1, 1998 4:45 pm
2308
[Forwarded for Peter Murray-Rust] [Steve Newcomb:] PaulP> I believe that through a careful agreement upon and application of ... SRN> ... Here is a simple...
Simon St.Laurent
SimonStL@...
Jun 1, 1998 5:06 pm
2309
... information summarizing or ... The term "metadata" has for a long time been used in completely different senses by different communities. In the document...
Michael Kay
M.H.Kay@...
Jun 1, 1998 5:24 pm
2310
As a long time Mac user, I stumbled across this URL today: http://macworld.zdnet.com/pages/july.98/News.4395html The page discusses Adobe's application to W3C...
Jack Park
jackpark@...
Jun 1, 1998 5:40 pm
2311
Vervet Logic Announces the Release of XML Pro v1.0 BLOOMINGTON (June 1) - Vervet Logic, a leading XML Tools development company, announced the release of their...
David Gulbransen
dgulbran@...
Jun 1, 1998 5:57 pm
2312
... Namespaces will, in general, also have associated stylesheets. Maybe in 10 years, they will, in general, also have associated Java classes and Yahoo ...
Paul Prescod
papresco@...
Jun 1, 1998 7:42 pm
2313
... I'm made to feel more in doubt than ever about the level of abstraction that's envisioned for "schema" (and XSchema) in this discussion. It's not clear to...
Robin Cover
robin@...
Jun 1, 1998 9:16 pm
2314
Ok here we go: crash course in RDF -- what i learned while participating in the RDF Schema WG (DISCLAIMER IN ADVANCE -- no secrets divulged here) But first,...
Lisa Rein
lisarein@...
Jun 1, 1998 9:50 pm
2315
We need to get the RDF discussion moving again so we can move on to specific syntax. Dan Brickley suggested that I take a look at the W3C's P3P proposal for...
Simon St.Laurent
SimonStL@...
Jun 1, 1998 10:05 pm
2316
... RDF is painfully simple, conceptually. And Lisa is correct in saying that the syntax is (IMHO unnecessarily) kinda ugly; I think there are good reasons to...
Tim Bray
tbray@...
Jun 1, 1998 10:48 pm
2317
... A related angle on this is that it would be possible for XSchema instances to be legitimate RDF-in-XML documents (ie. with an agreed mapping from XML...
Dan Brickley
Daniel.Brickley@...
Jun 1, 1998 11:20 pm
2318
... Great! If this is the case (and I think it is, except for content models, as you noted), I think we can move on to other issues. I'd like to see the...