¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

Paul Stephen Prueitt wrote (PSP):

PSP: This is a long "entangled bead" -- for explanation see:

PSP: http://www.ontologystream.com/area1/primarybeads/bead1.htm

<Dr Prueitt>
>
> Now this is very exciting. The BCNGroup Chapter directs us
> to mining scientific publications for emerging intellectual
> property and claim this property for the innovators and then
> allow (a choice) about whether this property may be assigned
> to the BCNGroup for community purposes. The harvest of IP
> from the science community might be done with the Mark3
> AND the AIDA (modified). The Value Proposition is huge,
> and Laramie is working on capitalization of a process
> that will get the BCNGroup Membership started:
>
> http://www.fourthwavegroup.com/bcn/universal_sandbox_project.htm
>
> The "Universal SandBox" is the key as the SandBox allows beadgames to be
played -->
> protected small virtual group collaboration at the innovation level (example:
the
> Int_group is now working out the Tobin/Prueitt AIDA IP). In these protected
virtual
> collaborations the development of IP is occuring very rapidly while at the
same time
> both a branding language (for public facing communications) and a IP
disclosure (for
> patent applications) is automatically produced.

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

I am not completely sure who was thumbing what bead in this very long and
tangled necklace,
but does not the very idea of a "protected perlenspiel" strike anyone else as a
contradiction
in the spirit if not in the letter of the Game?

Just Wondering,

Jon Awbrey

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤