By compensation do you mean cost ?
Unfortunately I believe they are about the same , I think I payed $120
for Mach 3 and I don't know what CNCpro is selling for now (I bought
mine about 6 years ago my serial # is below 70) .
Mach has many more bells and whistles and is much more modern but
requires a 1 gig or faster computer with Win XP .
CNCpro will run on almost any computer you find at a garage sale or by
the street .
I use mach on the big mill and 2 lathes and CNCpro on one lathe one
surface grinder and several home made things like a wire cutter and a
very small metal shear I constructed , because it is good for very basic
machine control using some OLD IBM laptops I picked up for almost nothing .
--
Ron Kline
American Precision Ceramics .. (Industrial ceramics)
Central Ky.
larrysalamey wrote:
>
> Too bad about it, it had a lot of potential. Does Mach3 have too
> width compensation? How much. Does anyone elso recommend anything
> else? What have most of the users gone to?
>
> Thanks
>
> Larry
>
> --- In yeagerautomation@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:yeagerautomation%40yahoogroups.com>, "Bob Muse" <mtebob1@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > It's been that way for a while now. Doug surfaced about a year ago
> with plans to write some new cnc software. Just about everyone who
> replied to him said that he has been out of the picture too long and
> to give up the idea-he would never be able to catch up with some of
> the current guys. I was using cncpro on an almost daily basis up
> until about 3 months ago. Built a new control for my flatbed mill
> and installed mach3-wow what a difference! Mach3 is lightyears ahead.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: dominickbox
> > To: yeagerautomation@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:yeagerautomation%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 11:18 AM
> > Subject: [yeagerautomation] What happened to Yeager Automation.?
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone know what happened to the Yeager Automation website? Also,
> > anyone know what happened to this forum. it seems to have been
> overrun
> > with spam messages
> >
>
>