-- Tobias Gies <tobiasgies@...> wrote
(on Friday, 17 October 2008, 02:19 PM +0200):
> good point. The first thing that came to my mind when thinking about your
> message was calling the namespace "Zend_Tool_ProcedureCall" or just
> "Zend_Tool_Call", because that's what describes best what it does. The current
> Endpoints of Zend_Tool_Rpc are all procedure calls, whether they are invoked
> from a remote point or the CLI.

Zend_Tool_Callback may make sense, as well -- because in essence, all
executable items are PHP callbacks.


> 2008/10/17 Wil Sinclair <wil@...>
>
>
> There has been some disagreement on the ZF team at Zend about whether
> Zend_Tool_Rpc is a good namespace. The following arguments have been put
> forth:
>
> Pro: It was modeled after an RPC interface and looks like an RPC
> interface, therefore the namespace is appropriate.
>
> Con: While some endpoints may expose an RPC interface, not all do. Many
> endpoints, such as CLI, would use the interface locally. The namespace
> therefore may lead to confusion about the architecture of the system.
>
> We'd like to go with the name that is the representative and clear, so
> we thought we'd run a small survey in this group. So what do y'all
> think?
>
> ,Wil
>
>
>

--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | matthew@...
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/